David McDaid

28
Can prevention and promotion save us? Making the case for investing in public health and health promoting interventions in times of crisis David McDaid LSE Health & Social Care & European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, London School of Economics and Political Science E-mail:[email protected] STRENGTHENING HEALTH PROTECTION IN TIMES OF ECONOMIC CRISIS: INCREASING THE EVIDENCE-BASE Science and Technology Options Assessment Unit, European Parliament, February 2013

description

Can prevention and promotion save us? Making the case for investing in public health and health promoting interventions in times of crisis. David McDaid LSE Health & Social Care & European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, London School of Economics and Political Science - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of David McDaid

Page 1: David McDaid

Can prevention and promotion save us? Making the case for investing in public health and health promoting interventions in times of crisisDavid McDaid

LSE Health & Social Care & European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, London School of Economics and Political Science

E-mail:[email protected]

STRENGTHENING HEALTH PROTECTION IN TIMES OF ECONOMIC CRISIS: INCREASING THE EVIDENCE-BASEScience and Technology Options Assessment Unit, European Parliament, February 2013

Page 2: David McDaid

Structure

• What do we know about the economic costs of poor health during economic crises?

• What do we know about the economic case for health promotion and public health?

• Examples of key areas for action during an economic downturn

• How can strengthen the evidence base and support implementation across sectors and stakeholders?

Page 3: David McDaid

Economic downturns have consequences for health which in turn have consequences for the economy

Page 4: David McDaid

Economic impacts• A reduction in over-eating, but also a reduction in diet

quality

• A reduction in alcohol consumption but increased risk of binge drinking with associated harms

• May be an increased risk of engaging in addictive behaviours

• May be a deterioration in population mental health – which also increases the risks of physical health problems

• May be an increased risk of intentional self-harm and suicide in some population groups

• Longer term consequences of cuts in public health, health care, pre-school care and welfare budgets

Page 5: David McDaid

Health Inequalities in EU-25 result in:

• 700,000 deaths per year• 1.4% less GDP growth due to

reduced labor productivity• 9.4% lost GDP (monetary

value)• 20% health care costs & 15%

of total cost of social security benefits

Mackenbach et al, 2007 & 2011

Health inequalities Health inequalities impact on economic growth impact on economic growth health care expenditure and health care expenditure and well-beingwell-being

Page 6: David McDaid

Impact of economic crises on mental health Previous crises: increases in unemployment and poverty increase the risk of poor mental health

Debt and other financial difficulties have a negative impact on mental health

Unemployment and poverty can contribute to depression and increase suicide risk

Wahlbeck, Anderson, Basu, McDaid et Stuckler, WHO, 2011

Valentina Iemmi
is this what you wanted to say?
Page 7: David McDaid

Income inequalities and mental health: 10 years following economic crisis

Hong, Knapp & McGuire, World Psychiatry 2011

Page 8: David McDaid

Number of debts and source of debt impacts on mental health

Source: Meltzer, Bebbington, Brugha, Farrell & Jenkins 2012 European Journal of Public Health (Advance Access)

Page 9: David McDaid

Source: OECD Health Data (2011)

Page 10: David McDaid

What do we know about economic evaluation of disease prevention and injury prevention and health promotion?

Page 11: David McDaid
Page 12: David McDaid

Promoting health, preventing disease: the economic case.

McDaid D, Sassi F, Merkur S (eds)McDaid D, Sassi F, Merkur S (eds)

• Forthcoming Open University Press 2013

• Joint European Observatory/OECD initiative on the

economics of health promotion and disease prevention

• Aim: to review the evidence base on the effectiveness and

cost-effectiveness of interventions addressing major risk

factors for NCDs

• Methodological and policy implementation issues addressed

Page 13: David McDaid
Page 14: David McDaid

Some illustrative examples of actions

Page 15: David McDaid

Associations of a Mass Rise (>3%) in Unemployment with Age-Standardised Mortality Rates. Source: Suhrcke & Stuckelr 2012

Data are from the World Health Organization EuropeanHealth for All Database 2008 Edition (HFA-MDB).

Page 16: David McDaid

Interventions Assessed – Obesity Interventions Assessed – Obesity PreventionPrevention

Health education and health promotion

Regulationand fiscal measures

Primary-care basedinterventions

Mass media campaignsFiscal measures

(fruit and vegetables and foodshigh in fat)

Physician counsellingof individuals at risk

School-based interventionsGovernment regulation of

food advertising to children

Intensive physician and dietician counselling of

individuals at risk

Worksite interventions Compulsory food labelling

Page 17: David McDaid

Cost-effectiveness Cost-effectiveness of Interventions Over Timeof Interventions Over Time

Sassi 2010

Page 18: David McDaid

Cost effectiveness of actions to address harmful alcohol consumption

Anderson, forthcoming

Page 19: David McDaid

Economic burden of children’s exposure to hazardous chemicals alongside intervention costs, effectiveness and potential benefits

Trasande & Brown, forthcoming

Page 20: David McDaid

Investing in road safety measures

Anderson, McDaid & Park, forthcoming

Page 21: David McDaid

Net Return on Investment

Page 22: David McDaid

Active Labour Markets• Actions to help people to find employment: include

labour market training, special programmes for young people in transition from school to work; programmes to provide or promote employment for people with disabilities.

• Psychological support for unemployed people to promote mental health and increase re-employment rates.

• Psychological support for people who lose their jobs as part of redundancy package that employers must provide

• Each $100 per capita on active labour market programmes reduces by 0.4% the impact of a 1% rise in unemployment on suicide (Stuckler et al 2009)

Page 23: David McDaid

Debt relief

• Help to manage debts can improve mental health• In Sweden people in high debt granted some debt

relief had better mental health (Enforcement Authority of Sweden, 2009)

• Access to debt management services in England associated with improved general health and optimism and reduced anxiety. (Williams & Sansom 2007)

• Access to microcredit; not for profit debt support agenci

• Scope for looking at reform of bankruptcy laws

Page 24: David McDaid

Family and Parenting Support Programmes

• Family support programmes – help with costs of raising children, as well as maternity/paternity and parental leave

• Critical at time when parental mental health may be under pressure

• Investment in measures to support the well-being of parents and their children can be protective of mental health, with long-term economic gains outweighing short-term costs (McDaid & Park 2011)

• Each $100 per capita on family support programmes reduces by 0.2% the impact of a 1% rise in unemployment on suicide (Stuckler et al 2009)

Page 25: David McDaid

The costs and benefits of population wide interventions are often fragmented. This can be a barrier to implementation

Page 26: David McDaid

Impact of budgetary silos

- 100

- 80

- 60

- 40

- 20

0

20

40

60

80

Education Sector Health Sector

ResourceConsequences

Health Benefits

Better EducationalOutcomes

Most of costs of health promoting interventionincurred by education

Health Benefits accrue to Health Sector

Improved educational performance? So why should education sector invest?

Or monetary transfer from health to education

Page 27: David McDaid

Factors to aid in implementation • Define problem / joint benefits of action• Identify all cross sectorial stakeholders / actors to be involved• Understand what are their priorities and goals – how would

joint funding of an initiative add value from their perspectives• Vital to highlight non-health benefits; speak non-public health

language• Sustained effort needed to build cross-sectoral working

relationships– Employing co-ordinators (esp where not full integration of budgets)– Co-locate team members to help trust/ working relationships develop

• A role for performance related financial incentives– Needs common set targets/performance indicators

• Highlight the economic case for cross-sectoral action

Page 28: David McDaid

In Summary

• There is an evidence base on cost effective prevention and health promotion interventions; but need more context specific analysis

• In economic downturns most immediate impacts on psychological health and wellbeing

• Cost effective measures to strengthen resilience and protect mental health

• Also key longer term risks to physical health, particularly if public health budgets seen as easy target

• But economic costs of avoidable poor health substantial