u ~tCOUNTY COMMISSION-REGULARSESSION

MAY 20, 2013

BE IT REMEMBEREDTHAT:

COUNTY COMMISSIONMET PURSUAN’l’ TO ADJOURNMENTINREGULAR SESSIONOF THE SULLIVAN COUNTYBOARD OFCOMMISSIONERSTHIS MONDAY MORNING, MAY 20, 2013,9:00 AM. INBLOUNTVILLE, TENNESSEE.PRESENTAND PRESIDINGWAS HONORABLESTEVE GODSEY,COUNTY MAYOR, JEANIE GAMMON, COUNTY CLERK OFSAID BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS,

TO WIT:

TheCommissionwascalledto orderby MayorSteveGodsey.SheriffAndersonopenedthe commissionandRev.PaulBeckergave theinvocation.Thepledgeto theflagwas led by SheriffAnderson.

COMMISSIONERSPRESENTAND ANSWERING ROLL WERE AS FOLLOWS:

CATHY ARMSTRONG —-_________________

MARK BOWERY BRYAN BOYDLINDA BR1TTENIJAM — MO BROTHERTONDARLENE CALTON — JOHNK. CRAWFORD0. W. FERGUSON JOHNGARDNER ___

TERRY IIARKLEROAD BAXTER HOODDENNIS HOUSER MATThEW JOHNSONBILL KILGORE DWIGHT KINGEDMARSHRANDY MORRELL BOB NEALPATRiCK W. SHULL MIKE SURCENORR. BOB WHITE ____ EDDIE WILLIAMS

I. ___

22 PRESENT I ABSENT (ABSENT-BOOMERSHrNE)COMM. WAYNE MCCONNELL PASSEDAWAY

Thefollowing pagesindicatestheaction takenby theCommissionon re-zoningrequests,approvalof notaryapplicationsand personalsuretybonds,motions,resolutionsandothermatterssubjectto theapprovalof theBoard ofCommissioners.

Motion wasmadeby Comm.Morrell andsecondedby Comm.Fergusonto approvethe minutesof the April 15, 2013 RegularSessionof County Commission. Saidmotion wasapprovedby voicevote.

OIL) 3 C

3258HWY. 126SUITE 101

BLOUNTVILLE, TENNESSEE37617

Sullivan CountyBRANCH OFFICES

TennesseeCourthouse— BristolBristol 989-4366

City Hall — KingsportKingsport224-1790

DATE: APRIL 1,2013

TO: SULLIVAN COUNTYCOMMISSIONERS

FROM: JEANIE GAMMON, COUNTY CLERK

RE: APPOINTMENTOF PURCHASINGAGENT

Notice is herebygivento eachof you thattherewill be an appointmentof PurchasingAgenton April 15, 2013. This will be heldat theRegularCommissionMeetingin theCommissionMeetingRoom,Blountville, Tennesseeat 9:00A.M.

Thisnoticeis given in accordancewith T.C.A. Section5-5-113,whichrequiresten(10)daysnotice, prior to this date.

cc: SteveGodsey,CountyMayorDanStreet,CountyAttorney

JeanieF. Gammon• County Clerk

Phone 323-6428

Ii 3 U U

KINGSPORT 1IMES~NEV\/5PUBLICATUJN CERJJFICME

King mod. TN

Thk is fo cerflfy that ~heLegal Notice hereto attached was puhI~shedThth” Kh K) Ii .1CS 1’lew~ J J0d r1ew~paperPULl’ ~fl~’d 4 The C ~/ ol

A A ~ ‘r~c, C) sfl~fl~ J t~

~heissue of £2/Jilt c>~?c,2t2/5 /

and appecnnc~ ••~ ._[~•~• Consecutive week(rimes.as per order

Signed

L •_-~••__~••__~~•________•• -.________ ________________________________________________

STATE OF TENNESSEE, SULLIVAN COUNTY, TO WIT:Personally appeared before me this~,~qd~day of_i La ___

2OI~. 5u1AyE~&th2kPJ _ __ __

of the K~ncjsport~imes-Newsand in due form 0f law made oath that the

foregoing statemeru was true to the best of my knowledge and belief.

j

My commission expires

SULLIVAN COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERSConfirmation of Appointment

PURCHASING AGENT FOR SULLIVAN COUNTY

Whereasin accordancewith T.C.A. §5-14-103,Sullivan CountyMayor, SteveM. Godseyrecommendsin favorof makingthere-appointmentof KristinaDavis to the positionof PurchasingAgentfor SullivanCounty;

Now therefore,theSullivan countyBoardofCommissionersherebyconfirmsthe appointment

of Krfstina Davis as Sullivan County PurchasingAgent

(Term:May 2013 - April 2015).

Confirmedthis 20thdayof May 2013,

~s~;~M. Godsey,Co~ty ayor

(~omn&est JearneF Gammon,County Jerk

CommissionAction:X Approvedby Roll Call Vote

Approvedby VoiceVote

RejectedonVote

AYE NAY PASS ABSENT

22 1

U 3 U u

SULLIVAN COUNTY BOA1Th OF COMMISSIONERSConfirmation ofAppointment

Whereasin accordancewith T.C.A. §7-86-105(b)(1),Sullivan CountyMayor, SteveM.Godseyrecommendsin favorof makingthefollowing appointmentto the Sullivan CountyEmergencyCommunicationsDistrict 9-1-1 Boardto fill out the unexpiredterm of DavidNelson;

Now therefore,the SullivanCountyBoardof Commissionersherebyappointmentas set below:

Sullivan CountyEmergencyCommunicationsDistrict Board

JerryMalone - TermExpires:September2014

Confirmedthis 20th Day Of May 2013

SteveM. Godsey,County ayor

JeanieF. Gain, County Clerk

CommissionAction:X Approvedby Roll Ca]lVote

Approvedby Voice Vote

RejectedonVote

confirmsthe

AYE NAY PASS ABSENT

22 1

CEty offlhzffC14’4591 Bluff City Highway-Bluff Cl(y,TN 37618

Telephone: (423) 538-7144 • Pac(422)638-71SSEmail:blufrs!yeityec@aOiMom

Mailing Adsess;P,O.80x70

Bluff Cit~Tennes5ee 87615

rneyager

be B1~ffCity4s

rn,~ -, rThnnIrr,am, o/c,1 ~~flj~fl~q 10 {ç~~fl_~g~çg~ g~,—gg—~Ø

U Jbu4’~

• The Honorable Mayor Steve GodseySullivan CountyBlountville,TN37617

May 8, 2013

Dear Mayor Godsey:

The Bluff City Board of Mayor& Alderman has appointedMr JerryMalone torepresentatjve on the Sullivan County 911 Board.

Sincerely,

N

Public Comment Session

Monday, May 20, 2013

PLEASE PRINT

Name Street Address City & State

SULLIVAN COUNTY COMMISSION

SULLIVAN COUNTY CLERK

JEANIE F. GAI*4ON COUNTY CLERK

3258 HIGHWAY126 SUITE 101BTJOUNTVILLE TN 37617

423—323—6428423—279—2725

Notaries to be elected May 20,2013

DONNA 0. ADAMSDONNA M. BAYSWENDY M. BENNE1THANNAH R. BIBEEALYSSA BOWMANPATRICIA L. BUCKLESROBERT DELMAR CARMODYSUSAN A. CARTERPATTIE LAVERNE CATRONBLANCHE M. CHURCHWELLSTEPHANIE B. CLISSOCINDY L COATESDUFFY JONES COLEMEGGAN BALTHIS DAYTAMARA RENEE FITZPATRICKPATRICIA NADDER FUNKLAURA RUTH HARRSONYA SLAUGHTER HELMKAREN KAY HURDJENNIFER GAIL JONESSANDRA T. KILGORECOLLEEN B. KUDEREWSKI

SUSAN 0. MANCABELLIMARY K. MASTERSCAMMIE N. MCDAVIDB. KEVIN MOODYSANDRA B. MOODYDEBORAH A. MORRISONR. H. OLIVERCATHY B QUILLENGRETA RAMEYANN PHILLIPS REYNOLDSDEBRA SCISM SAUCEMANEWING T. SEXTON

JASON SHAWN STONECHRISTIE GALE SWINNEYPATRICIA LOUISE WAMPLERWALTER J WATTSEUNICE JOETTA WEBBREBECCA G WI-JEELOCKCYNTHIA WILLIAMS

PERSONAL SURETY$10,000.005,000NOTARY BONDJOHNNY R CLARKWILLIAM C SUMNER

UPON NOTION MADE BY COMM. WRITE ANDAPPROVETHE NOTARY APPLICATIDNS BEREON,CALL VOTE OF TUE COMMISSION. 21 AYE, 1

SECONDED BY COMM. BOWERY TOSAID NOTION WAS APPROVED BY ROLLPASS, 1 ABSENT

ü U U J 4

TelephoneFax

STATE OF TENNESSEECOUNTY OF SULL WAN

APPROVAL OF NOTARYSURETY BONDS

MAY 20, 2013

NAME OF NOTARY PERSONAL SURETY PERSONAL SURETYJESSICA T. GOAD STEVEN W. MORGAN, MD EARL K. WILSON, MDLINDA M. JONES LENA MULLINS JERRYWORLEYREBECCA A. TIIEALL DEREK MALCOLM GARY MALCOLMC. EDWIN WILLIAMS CHARLES ~V.HUNT JOETTA KETRONFRANK WINSTON C. NI. (BILL) GATTON DANNY L DUNN

UPON MOTION MADE BY COMM. WHITE AND SECONDED BY COMM. BOWERY TOAPPROVE THE NOTARY BONDS OF THE ABOVE NAMED INDIVIDUALS, SAID MOTION WASAPPROVEDBY ROLL CALL VOTE OF THE COMMISSION. 21 AYE, 1 PASS, 1 ABSENT

REZONING OVERVIEWSULLIVAN COUNTY COMMISSION MEETING

May 20,2013

RESOLUTION #1 - To Consider the Waiver of Rules for the following zoning amendments (map or text)

ApplicaUon File Applicant Neighbor Staff Planning Commission Current Requested CivilNo. No. Opposition Recommendation Recommendation Zone Zone District

I 02113/#1 Edward Clendenin R-1/A-1 R-3 18th

2 02/13*2 Louise Harrison R-1/A-1 AR 8th

1 Article 8-10~ Stormwater Management, Erosion and Saediment Control Codes

Sullivan County Approve Approve

Kingsport • Approve Approve

Bristol , Approve Approve

SullivanAGENDA

County Board of County

U&J~u

Commission

May20,2013

TheSullivanCounty BoardofCountyCommissionerswill holdapublic hearingonMonday,May20,2013 at9:00 A.M. in theSullivanCounty Courthouse,Blountville, TNto considerthefollowing requests:

(1) File No 02/13/Ill EdwardClendeninReclassif~’2 parcelsofpropertylocatedat 1591 MuddyCreekRoadR-l(LowDensity/single-FamilyResidentialDistrict)and A-I (GeneralAgricultural/EstateResidentialDistrict) to R-3 (ManufacturedResidentialDwelling ParkDistrict) forthepurposeof bring his mobilehomepark into compliancewith zoning.Property

ID No Tax Map 95,Parcels03301& 03400beinglocatedin the 18 Civil District.Sullivan CountyPlanning

(2) FileNo 02/13/#2 LouiseHarrisonReclassi&propertylocatedat613 Buffalo Roadfrom R-l (Low Density/single-Family ResidentialDistrict) to AR (Agricultural, Rural Residentialand LightRecreationalDistrict) for thepurposechangingan old Mobile homeParkintoacommercialcampground.PropertyID No Tax Map 096-A, GroupA, Parcel01700beinglocatedin the8th Civil District.Sullivan CountyPlanning

(3) Article 8-103StormwaterManagerncnt,Erosionand SedimentControl CodesAmendments

~1

UUUJJ~ ~ifox/i3/Rt.J_ 3PETITIONTO SULL1VAN COUNTYFOR REZONING

A requestfor rezoningis madeby thepersonnamedbelow;said requestto go beforetheSullivan County RegionalPlanningCommissionfor recommendationtotheSullivan CountyBoardofCommissioners.

PlannitigCommissionApproved____tq/ufl,~ C:l’,ni Denied _____

CountyCommissionApproved x

o1/~o/i~q~01jhnied

Other Roll Call Vote 22 Aye.

1 Absent

Final ActionDate 05-20—13

Property

Address:

Owner: Edward Clendenin

233 Spanl!ler RoadPines’Flats. TN37686

OFFICE USEONLY

Meetimg Date 04/16t2013 Time 6:00 pm

Place Old Blountville Corthouse

Phone 323-4730 Dateof Request02/1912013

PropertyLocatedin ~ Civil District

SignatureofApplicant

,

Tax MapNo. 095

PROPERTYIDENtIFICATION

/ Group - / Parcel 03301&03400

ZoningMap 17 Zoning District R-1 & A-i Proposed District ~

PropertyLocation:

Purposeof Rezoning:

1591 Muddy Creek Road

into complaincewith ZoninE.To bring Moblie Homepark

The undersigned,being duly sworn, hereby acknowledgesthat the Informationprovided inthis petition to Sullivan County for Rezoning is true and correct to the best of my information,knowledgeandbelief.

SWORNTOANDSUBSCRIBEDbCfOreWethis /t dayof_______ . d~

oZL9V1~J~-NotawPublic

My Commission Expires: a - 1015

UJLjJ.

PETITION TO SULLIV~&j~COUNTY FOR REZONING

A requestfor rezoningis madeby the personnamedbelow; said requestto go before theSullivan County RegionalPlanning Commission for recommendation to the Sullivan County Boardof Commissioners.

OFFICE USE ONLYProperty Owner: Louit~Harrison

Meeting Date 04/16/2013Time 6:00pmAddress: 1816A Big Hollow Road

Blountville, TN 37617 Place Old Blountvifle CourthouseI

Phone323-1186Dateof Request03/01/2013 ______________________________________Planning CommissionApproved ______

Denied ________

Property LocatedinS Civil District 01/ii G/2C~J’~,,8County Commission Approved X

Denied _________

Roll Call Vote 22 Aye,Signature of Applicant Other ______________________________

I ADSCIIL

05—20—13Final Action Date

Tax Map No. 096A

PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION

/ Group A / Parcel 01700

Zoning Map 17 ZoningDistrict R-1 ProposcdDistrict ~

Property Location:

Purpose of Rezoning:

613Buffalo Road

park to a commercialcampgroudTo changean old moblie borne

The undersigned,being duly sworn, hereby acknowledgesthat the information provided inthis petition to Sullivan County for Rezoning is true and correct to the best of my information,kno~frØçe and belief.

c~2~ / STATE •

: OF ~TENNE~~~JL1.~0ANI) SUBSCRIBEDbeforeme this I day of ~ , ~ oil

. NOTA~; (p~PUBLIC :,~

It! Ifl~~~’

NotaryPublicMyCommissionExpires: ‘~~72t9LI

r—: na. - a

u ~ StiL{1VAN COUNTY ZONING RESOLUTION — CODE EFFECTIVE TO ALL PROPERTIES IN THE COUNTY

8-103 Peak Stormwater Mananement and Erosion and Sediment Control Pollution Provontlon Land disturbanceand other forms of site excavation can contribute to the degradation of land surfaces and streams, erosion, siltation, earthslides, mudflows, dusty conditions, dogged storm sewers, additional road maintenance cost, increased water runoff andlocalized flooding. Furthermore, Sullivan County’s streams, creeks, sinkholes, rivers and lakes have a high concentrationof soil sedimentation due in part from poor construction practices. It is the intent of this section to protect the health andsafety of residents and adjoining or nearby property in the county, induding land, waterways, ridges, hills and vegetationthrough the regulation of erosion and sedimentation control measures. Except as otherwise provided for, the followingregulations shall apply in all zoning districts of the unincorporated territories of Sullivan County, as illustrated on the officialSullivan CountyZoning Map.

8-103.1 DefinitIons - The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this section, shall have themeanings ascribed to them, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning:

Cut — means the portion of land surface or area from which earth has been or will be removed by excavation; also, thedepth below original ground surface to excavated surface.

Erosion — means any removal or loss of soil by the action of wind and water. Erosion includes both the detachmentand transportation of soil particles.

Erosion and Sediment Control Measures — means one or more of the following measures, or other methods ofslowing or stopping the removal of soil by wind, water, or gravity used singularly or in combination as appropriate:

a. Diversion: A swale or channel with supporting ridge (berm, dike, or wall) constructed across asloping landsurface along the contour, or with predetermined grades, to intercept and divert surface runoff before it gainssufficient volume or velocity to create conditions of erosion.

b. Drains: Underground conduits or filter drains to reduce surface runoff or lower a high water table.c. Grade stabilization structures: Drop structures made of concrete, corrugated metal pipe or other suitable

materials, which dissipate the energy of flowing water by dropping it in a relatively short horizontal distance.d. Grassed waterways: A natural or constructed waterway, usually broad and shallow, covered with erosion-

resistant grasses used to carry surface water.e. Land grading: Reshaping the ground surface by grading to planned slopes and configurations that will

prevent excessive erosion conditions.1. Mulching: The application of plant or other suitable materials on the soil surface to conserve moisture, reduce

erosion and aid in establishing plant cover.g. Sediment and erosion control devices barriore: A temporary device barrior installed to intercept runoff

containing sediment. The device shall settle out codiment or filter sediment and allow runoff to pact through.Sediment barriers may include straw bale barriers and silt fences when installed. My method approved bythi Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation Office may be utilIzed, as appropriate tothe site; and

h. Temporary cover: Any method approved by the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation totemporarily stabilize disturbed areas.

Excavation — means the act of removing dirt or soil (see cut).

Fill - means the portion of land surface or area to which soil, rock or other materials have been or will be added; heightabove original ground surface after the material has been or will be added.

Grade — means the slope or elevation, of the ground surface prior to or after cutting and filling.

Grading — means any operation or occurrence by which the existing site elevations are changed by cutting, filling,borrowing or stock piling, or where any ground cover, natural or manmade, is removed, or any buildings or otherstructures are removed or any watercourse or body of water, either natural or manmade, is relocated on any site,thereby creating an unprotected area. Grading shall be synonymous with land disturbance activity.

Immediate threat to public health and safety — means a very serious threat to the community or adjacent propertyincluding, but not limited to, clogged drainage ditches, flooding of adjacent properties, threat of landslides or otherproblems

Land Disturbing Activity— means any activity, which removes or significantly disturbs the vegetative cover, includingclearing and grubbing operations and top soil stripping.

Land disturbance plan (grading plan) — means the plan required before a grading permit may be issued. It consists ofa narrative description and appropriate drawings and plans that spell out the methods, techniques and procedures tobe followed on a site to control erosion and other potential degradation of adjoining or nearby properties, during andafter development, including methods of final stabilization of the site. The plan shall also include stormwaterconveyance and management systems, where applicable. Supporting technical design information must be providedfor erosion and sediment control and measures and for the design of the permanent stormwater conveyance andmanagement systems.

Owner — means the person or entity holding the registered title to property. The county property tax rolls shall beprima fade evidence that the persons or entity listed therein is the registered owner.

Permit holder — means the owner of the property or the owner’s representative in whose name a permit has beenapplied for and issued by the county Land Use Office.

Riparian Zone/Natural buffer — means the existing wooded buffers, meadows and fields along the banks of anystream, creek, or river, (as indicated on the latest version of the USGS topographical maps as bluoline streams) whichserve as natural elements protecting the water quality.

Sediment — means rocks, sand, gravel, silt or other material deposited by action of wind, water or gravity.

Sedimentation — means the action of settling out of the soil particles, which are transported by wind, water, or gravity.

Stormwater Pollution Prevention P/an (,SWPPP) -This is a combination of the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan and

a narrative in accordance with the State of Tennessee’s currentConstructionGeneralPermit.

8,103.2 Grading Permit

A, Requirement - Except as otherwise exempted in section 8-103.3, no individual, property owner or other legalentity shall engage in any land disturbing activity which will modify the existing grade and/or may result inincreased soil erosion or sedimentation including, but not limited to, clearing, stripping, grading, excavatingtransporting, and filling unless a grading permit and land disturbing plan has first been obtained from theCounty Land Use Office. The ownerof the property or his representative shall complete an applièation for thepermit and shall submit a proposed grading plan and land disturbing plan with the application. The propertyowner shall be responsible for compliance with all provisions of this section. The grading permit does notpreclude additional permits or authorization required by the State of Tennessee or the county.

B. Planning Commission or Building Commissioner Authorization — In instances where a proposed landdisturbance activity will equal or exceed I acre, is part of a larger common development which will disturb atleast 1 acre, or will occur on any tract as a part of an overall high-density residential, commercial ormanufacturing development plan, or will occur as a part of an environmental restoration project under thesupervision of the United State Environmental Protection Agency or the State Department of Environment andConservation or their successors, no grading permit shall be issued by the county until the grading plan andland disturbing plan is reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission and/or the BuildingCommissioner.

C. Pre-construclion Meetinci — For projects which drain into a siltation impaired stream or into an ExceptionalWater of the Stale, a pre-construction meeting shall be held between the County and the Owner/Developerbefore the grading permit is issued. The purpose of the pre-construction meeting is to review the approvedplan, SWPPP, inspection requirements, maintenance requirements, other items, and to discuss theimportance of protecting the water quality of the receiving stream.

8-103.3 Properties Exempt from Grading Permit - The following uses and activities ‘shall be exempt from therequired grading plan and issuance of grading permit with the following guidelines:

(I) Single-Family residences — The construction of a single-family residence, addition to an existingsingle-family residence or all permitted accessory structures on a legal lot shall be exempt from the

Ugrading permit process, provided, however, such construction shall be required to comply with theerosion control requirements set forth herein. Upon receipt of a building permit, the property ownershall be advised by an employee of the county as to the minimum erosion and sedimentation controlmeasures, to ensure practical management of stormwater run-off. All run-off of water and/orsedimentation shall be the responsibility of the current property owner and any clean-up of such shallbe at no cost to the county.

(2) Public Utilities and Roadway Construction — The installation, maintenance and repair of any publicutility as well as public roadway and storm drainage construction and maintenance by governmentalagencies and/or their agents; provided, however that such land disturbing activity shall comply fullywith the rules and regulations set forth by the 1e+wessea_Depactment_4f-_&MrowleRt—afldCensec~vaIien-Tennessee’s current Construction General Permit, July 1. 2000).

(3) Agricultural Uses — Farming or other accepted agricultural uses, as Identified in the Tennessee Rightto Farm Act (T.C.A. § 43-26-103), or as hereafter amended.

(4) Lawns/Gardens/Landscaping — Home gardens, home landscaping or lawn preparation on existinglots or parcels shall be exempted from the provisions stated in this article unless the possibility forerosion or alteration of drainage patterns or structures is such to necessitate a grading permit and/oralternative plan.

(5) Silviculture Uses — The timbering and harvesting of trees strictly as a silviculture practice and not as aprecursor to later development. However, timbering activities should follow best managementpractices, as outlined in the Guide to Forestry Best Management Practices — Tennessee Departmentof Agriculture, Division of Forestry, or current revisions, to protect streams and other sensitive areas.

8-103.4 Land Disturbance Plan (Grading Plan) - The land disturbance plan or grading plan, shall comply withthe minimum general and technical requirements set forth in this secflon. The complexity of the plan shall becommensurate with the severity of the site conditions and potential for off-site damage. The Planning Commissionand/or the staff planner may require additional information if deemed necessary and appropriate to evaluate thefeasibility of the plan. The grading plan shall be submitted and approved prior to any grading or construction activities.

(1) Plan Required — Except as otherwise exempted from the requirements of this article, a grading planshall be required prior to the Issuance of a grading or building permit. The plan shall Identify thespecific and appropriate erosion control practices and sediment trapping facilities proposed for thesite to be disturbed as well as a schedule for implementation and maintenance. The plan shall alsoidentify final stabilized conditions for the site, provisions for removing temporary control measuresand stabilization of the site when temporary measures are removed, permanent stormwaterconveyance structures and maintenance requirements for any permanent measures.

(2) Professional Design — The grading plan shall be developed by a qualified design professional,licensed to practice in the State of Tennessee t~’hohas comploted and been certiflod in theetormwater, erosion and sediment convol far stormwater quality (CPESC SWO), such as a qualifiedprofessional engineer, qualified landscape architect, or qualified land surveyor; or CertifiedProfessional in Erosion and Sediment Control (CPESC).

For projects which require a construction general permit through the State of Tennessee, the SWPPP(plan and narrative) shall be prepared by a person in accordance with the current State of TennesseeConstruction General Permit and submitted to the County. The SWI~PPshall contain all requiredinformation at required by the current State of Tennessee Construction General Permit. Be aware thatthe requirements for projects which drain into an impaired stream or Exceptional Waters of the Stateare different than for projects draining to an unimpaired stream.

Erosion & Sedimentation Control — Erosion control measures shall be designed and provided inaccordance with the latest version of the Tennessee Erosion and Sediment Control Handbookand Tennessee’s Construction General Permit. If there is a conflict between these regulations and theState of Tennessee’s Regulation, the most stringent regulation shall apply. Areas that are to bedeveloped or excavated shall apply these guidelines, fitting the appropriate measures to the specificsoils and topography so as to minimize soil erosion and surface water runoff. Erosion and sedimentcontrol measures shall be maintained until the site is significantly stabilized and maintained whennecessary.

‘111JL

All perimeter sediment control devices such as construction exits, earth berms/dikes, swales,sediment basins sediment traps, and other perimeter drainage and sedimentation control measuresshall be installed in conjunction with initial work and must be in place and functional prior to the initialgrading operations.

All erosion and sediment control devices shall be designed for the 2 year, 24 hour storm as aminimum. For drainage area of 10 acres or more to a single outfall point, a sediment basin(s) orequivalent measures shall be used and designed for the 2 year, 24 hour storm.

For projects which drain into an impaired or exceptional state water, the erosion and sediment controldevices shall be designed for the 5 year, 24 hour storm and a sediment basin or equivalent measuresshall be used for drainage areas of 5 acres or more to a single outfall point.

(3) Protection of Natural Vegetation and Trees — Natural vegetation shall be retained and protectedwhenever feasible during construction. If an area is stripped of vegetation during construction, theexposed area shall be limited to the smallest practical size, and durations of the exposure limited tothe shortest practical time. Temporary barriers shall be maintained around the drip line/canopy of theexisting trees to be protected.

(4) Minimum Information Reguired — It shall be at the discretion of the Building Commissioner how muchinformation is necessary to obtain a permit. At a minimum, the following information shall be requiredin order to evaluate the proposed development.a) Name, address and all available numbers of the permit holder, and the owners and developer, if

other than the permit holder, for the property to be graded.b) The registration seal and signature of the engineer, landscape architect, land surveyor or

Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Conlrol (CPESC) who prepared, designed andreferenced the plan.

c) Cover letters addressed to the Planning Commission and/or Building Commissioner stating theintent of plans and project description.

d) A plan which is drawn to a scale no less than one inch equals 100 feet, including predevelopmenttopographic conditions and post-development grades. The contour interval shall be no greaterthan five feet. The plan shall include off-site existing topographic conditions extended to aminimum of 25 feet beyond the boundaries of the subject tract of land if grading is designed to bewithin 25 feet of any boundary line. The pre-development conditions survey shall also includeinformation on all public roads adjoining the subject property.

e) The site location, boundaries, adjacent properties, location of any existing or proposed buildingsor structures on the property or on adjacent land within 100 feet of the area to be disturbed,floodplain areas, ditch lines and any existing on-site and off-site structural or natural features ofthe land which have a significant impact on drainage or sediment control.

f) Outline of all drainage basins within the project area.g) Identification of all streams, wetlands and sinkholes within the project area.h) The location and a description of the temporary and permanent erosion control measures and

drainage apparatuses to be constructed and structural changes and improvements to the land,including clearing and grading limits, daily cleanup and site control practices and other activitiesto mitigate the adverse impact of land disturbance.

i) A timo sohedulo for initiation- and completion of the meacures and dovicos and poriodiomaintenanco after completion. A general sequence of construction explaining when sedimentcontrol, drainage, and stormwater management devices are to be installed in relation to othercomponents of the site development is to be provided on the plans. The sequence of constructionshall state that no clearing or grading may begin until all perimeter sediment control devices arein place and functional.

j) Stormwater conveyance systemk) Stormwater Management system design and calculations.

(5) Final-Inspections Required — Upon completion of the development, the design professional eng~neecwho designed the stormwater conveyance and management system, or another design professionalqualified to design stormwater systems, shall inspect the as-built condition design and issue a letter tothe county certifying that such design complies with the approved plans, will support the stormwater

U -~iiu 3run-off and complies with all requirements stated herein. All approvals of a final plat, final site planand/or Certificate of Occupancy shall be withheld until such as-built inspection has been certified asstated above, by the engineer who designed the stormwater plan.

For drainage areas of 10 acres or more to a single outfall (5 acres or more if draining to siltation orstream-side habitat alteration Impaired or exceptional waters of the state), a site assessment by thedesign professional who prepared the plans shall be performed within 1 month of grading or clearingoperations starting to verify the installation, functionality and performance of all erosion and sedimentcontrol measures on the plans and in the SWPPP. Any issues shall be addressed immediately andthe plans and SWPPP updated, if applicable.

The Building Commissioner, with the assistance of others, shall make periodic inspections, duringconstruction and development, of the land disturbing activities, the stormwater management systeminstallations, and other activities requiring a grading permit to ensure compliance with the approvedplan. For construction sites draining to siltation impaired streams or exceptional waters of the State,the County shall perform at least monthly inspections. Inspections will evaluate whether themeasures required in the approved plan and/or grading permit and undertaken by the Developer areeffective in controlling erosion. The right of entry to conduct such inspections shall be expresslyreserved in the permit.

As a minimum, the owner/operator of any construction project which requires a land disturbance planis required to perform twice weekly inspections of their erosion and sediment control devices and toperform required maintenance in a timely manner. If the construction project requires a constructionstormwater permit through the State of Tennessee, the owner/operator shall perform inspections, siteassessments, maintenance of devices, and documentation in accordance with the State ofTennessee’s current Construction General Permit.

8-103.5 Construction Access Routes - A stabilized stone pad, meeting requirements of the Tennessee Erosionand Sediment Control Handbook, shall be placed at any point where traffic will be entering and leaving a constructionsite to or from a public road prior to the initiation of any grading work. Stone pads shall contain ASTM 1 stono~-sixinches thick, and shall be placed from the public read into the sonstruetion tile a minimum width of 12 feet and lengthof 100 feet for eammercial and 10 feet for residential develepments. If there is runoff flowing down the constructionexit to the street, a mountable stone berm or equivalent measures shall be used to direct the runoff to sedimentcontrol devices adjacent to the exit.

8-103.6 Cut and Fill SloMs - Permanent cut and fill slopes shall be designed and constructed in a manner thatwill minimize erosion. Consideration shall be given to the length and steepness of the slope, the soil type, upslopedrainage area, groundwater conditions and other applicable factors. Any slopes installed at two foot horizontal to onefoot vertical or steeper shall be stabilized with rock riprap or other acceptable method approved by the PlanningCommission and/or staff planner and Building Commissioner. - -

8-103.7 StabIlization of Denuded Areas and Soil Stock~lles- Permanent erosion control measures shall beapplied to denuded areas within 45 14 days after final grade is reached on any portion of the site. Soil stabilizationshall also be applied within 45 14 days to any denuded area, which may not be at final grade, but will remain dormant(undisturbed by construction activity) for longer than ao 14 days. For slopes 3:1 or steeper, they must be temporarilyor permanently stabilized within 7 days of grading ceasing on those slopes.

Any temporary soil stockpiles shall be stabilized or protected with sediment trapping measures to prevent erosion.Stockpiles of soil, fill or other materials shall not be placed in an area that may cause a site visibility hazard, such aswithin a right-of-way. Applicable erosion control measures shall include establishment of vegetation, mulching andthe early application of gravel base on areas to be paved. -

Selected permanent or temporary erosion control measures should be appropriate for the time of year, site conditionsand estimated duration of use. Under no circumstances shall this local requirement relieve the applicant fromcomplying with the TDEC General Permit No. TNR 10-0000 Construction General Permit for Stormwater Discharges.

- - -

8-103.8 Protection of Adiacent PropertiesA. Downhill Protection — All properties adjacent and/or downhill from the site of a land disturbance shall be

protected from soil erosion and sedimentation. This shall be accomplished by preserving a well-vegetatedbuffer strip around the lower perimeter contiols such as sediment barriers, filters or dikes, or sediment basins,or by a combination of such measures.

B. Use of Buffer Strips — Vegetated buffer strips shall be used alone only where stormwater runoff is anticipatedto occur through sheet flow and shall be a minimum of 20 feet in width. If at any time it is found that avegetated buffer strip alone is ineffective in stopping erosion onto adjacent property, additional perimetercontrols shall be provided by the owner.

C. Sediment Control — Sediment basins and traps, perimeter dikes, sediment barriers, check-dams, diversionsand other erosion control measures intended to trap sediment on-site to protect downstream or adjacentproperties shall be constructed as the first step in grading and shall be made functional prior to disturbance ofupslope land. Earthen structures such as dams, dikes and diversions shall be seeded and mulched/strawedwithin seven days of installation.

The Building Commissioner has the authority, at his/her discretion, to require ground cover or otherremediation measures preventing stormwater, erosion and sediment run-off, if either determines, afterconstruction begins, that the plan and/or implementation schedule approved by the Planning Commissiondoes not adequately provide the protection intended by this Resolution and the plan approved by the PlanningCommission. Additional protective -measures required by the Building Commissioner are subject to appealunder the procedures outlined in the Zoning Resolution.

0. Stormwater Runoff— Stormwater runoff shall be managed to protect downstream or adjacent properties fromsediment runoff, erosion, or an increase in runoff rate that could damage those properties. from dicturbodareas one acreof greater shall passthrough a sediment basin or other suitable sediment trapping facility. Allstorm drainage inlets shall be protected during construction with a sediment barrier to prevent clogging andlocalized flooding. All means of protection shall be maintained and monitored throughout construction.

8-103.9 Disturbance in and along Streams and Floodways - The applicant for proposed land disturbanceactivities in streams or other Waters of the State (defined—by-a--bkio lino on a 7 1,4 minute Unitod Statoc GeologicalSurvoy quadrangle) and designated floodways shall be required to provide evidence of obtaining appropriate permitsfrom federal and state regulatory agencies or a written waiver of such permits prior to the issuance of a grading permitby the county. tn—all-cases-where the dovolopn,ent site has a stream blue lino stroams and is not designated as afloodway on the most recent Flood Insurance Rate Map or other best available certified data, a minimum of 20 footshall bo reserved along the highest wator mark or crook bank on both cides of the channel as a protected undisturbodriparianlbuffer zono.

A minimum twenty-five (25) foot permanent undisturbed buffer shall be provided from the top of bank along both sidesof streams or Waters of the State except as necessary for the crossing of the stream for installation of utilities,development of roads, or construction of outfalls for stormwater facilities, related drainage improvements and forremoval of invasive species to enhance the existing buffer. These utility, road, and stormwater outfall disturbancesshall be designed to minimize disturbance and impact on the stream and its buffers. Any disturbance to a stream orwetland requires an Aquatic Resource Alteration permit through the State of Tennessee.

During construction, a 30’ average (15’ minimum) undisturbed buffer or equivalent measures, shall be provided fromthe top of the stream bank. If the stream is siltation or streamside habitat impaired or an exceptional water of thestate, the undisturbed buffer during construction is increased to a 60’ average (30’ minimum) or equivalent measures.

8-1 03.10 Peak Stormwater Management (Drainage Plan) Pre-construction and Post constructionA. Purpose — The intent of this section is to protect the health and safety of the residents of the county; to control

the level and intensity of storniwater runoff consistent with existing runoff levels; to minimize expenditure ofpublic funds for costly flood control projects; to minimize the need for rescue and relief efforts associated withflooding; to maximize beneficial use of land without incurring flood hazard potential; to ensure a functionaldrainage system that will not result in excessive maintenance costs; to encourage the use of natural and

37‘U J U u J

aesthetically pleasing design; to ensure water quality; and to protect or improve groundwater or surfacewaters.

B. SHe Plan Approval — Prior to approval of the sfte development plan or final subdivision plat; the countyPlanning & Codes department in consultation with the design professional preparing the site developmentplan or final subdivision plat shall determine whether there is a need for a stormwater management planbased upon historical findings, any current adopted floodplain studies, hydrologic calculations as may berequired, and other factual data as may be available. When a storrnwater management plan is required, suchplan shall be concurrently submitted to the Highway and Planning & Codes departments for review andrecommendations prior to consideration by the Planning Commission.

C. Improvements Required — The Planning Commission may require, as necessary, struelural or otherimprovements designed to detain the level and intensity of stomiwater runoff associated with the landdevelopment site. A drainage calculation report shall be addressed and submitted to the PlanningCommission, as prepared by a licensed engineer. All plans and repels shall be original and wat stamped bysuch reporting engineer and addressed to the sounly direstly. Any sterniwater runoff, which is channeled,either through struotural facilities or graded ditches, to adjacent properties, the developer shall be responsiblefor preparing, securing and recording a drainage easement to er~urethat all adjacent land owners who maybecome affected by the development, now or in the future, are aware and agree to such plan.

If stormwater management is required, best management practices shall be implemented that accommodateany increase in stormwater runoff generated by the development in a manner in which the pre developmentlevels of runoff for the two (2) and ten (10) year storm events are not increased during and followingdevelopment and construction. The Planning Commission reserves the right to require stormwatermanagement to maintain pre development levels of runoff for the 25, 50, or 100-year storm event if a knownflooding problem exists downstream.

Sullivan County wishes to minimize the negative effects of development on our environment, on our economy,and on our health while at the same time reducing development costs for the developers and maintenancecosts for the county and the developer. AU efforts should be utilized to implement site design and non-structural stormwater management practices to reduce and minimize runoff in new development. Efforts toenhance infiltration, passage or movement of water into the soil surface, reduction of hard surfaces,minimizing the concentration of runoff, and lengthening of the timeof concentration should be a priority+

The following BMPs and storniwatercreditscan be appliedto thepeakand waterquality stonnwater calculationstherebyreducing the size andcost ofthe stormwater BMPs:

(a) Naturalareaconservation

Thepreservationof forest,wetlands,pastureland, andothersensitiveareasofexistingvegetationtherebyretainingpre-developmenthydrologicandwaterquality characteristics.tf theseareasareundisturbedandplacedin a recordedprotectiveeasement,theseareasmay besubtractedfrom the totalsiteareawhencalculatingwaterqualityvolume.Thepostdevelopmentcurvenumbersfor theseareascanbemodeledasforestin goodcondition.

(b) Disconnectionofrooftop runoff

Rooftoprunoffthat is disconnectedfrom anotherimpervioussurficeanddirectedoveraperviousareawillinfittrate into the soil orbe filteredby thesurfacemateriat.Thelongerthe flow path of the waterfrom thepipeacrossvegetatedareas,the greaterthe filtering and infIltration ofthemn-offwhich in turn improveswaterquality andreducesdownstreamrun-off.

If the lot is gradedto dispersetherooftoprunoffassheetflow throughat least50’ ofthick grassor-otherthick vegetationorthroughat least25’ of existingwoodlands,50%oftherooftop imperviousareadrainingthroughthevegetationmaybemodeledasgrassin goodconditionwhencalculatingthepostdevelopmentcurvenumber. If reforestationorplantedlandscapebedsequalin areato 50%of the rooftopareais placedin thepathofthedisconnectedrooftop runoff, thentheremaining50%oftherooftop imperviousareamaybemodeledasgrassin goodconditionwhen calculatingthepost developmentcurvenumber.

u -.

If the rooftoprunoff is dischargedinto a properlydesignedandconstructedbioretentionfacility/rain gardenonsite, 100% of the rooftopimperviousareadraining to the devicemaybemodeledasgrassin goodconditionwhencalculatingthepostdevelopmentcurvenumber.

In addition, underbothconditionslistedabove,the total imperviousareain thewaterqualitycalculationsmaybereducedrelativeto the imperviousareareductionassociatedwith thecurvenumbercredit.

If downspoutsneedto bepipedawayfrom building foundationsto preventdamageto the foundations,thepipesmustoutfall at least ten (tO) feet,preferablefurther,from anypropertyline. If the downspoutsarepipedandtherunoffcannotdispersein accordancewith theaboverequirements,no stormwatercredit isavailable.

(c) Disconnectionof non-rooftopimperviousrunoff

Rooftoprunoff thatis disconnectedfrom anotherimpervioussurfaceanddirectedovera perviousareawillinfiltrate into the soil or befilteredby thesurfacematerial.Thelongerthe flow pathof the wateracrossvegetatedareas,thegreaterthefiltering and infiltration of the runoffwhich in turn improveswaterqualityandreducesdownstreamrunoff.

Dischargingrun-offfrom impervioussurfacesontopervioussurfacesthroughtheuseofperviouspayers,permeablepavingsurfaces,rain gardens/bioretentionfacilities, grassedswales,useof openroadsectionsinlieu ofcurbedroads,andby gradingthe site so thatrun-off travels from an impervioussurfaceto a pervioussurfacebeforebeingcollectedin a drainagesystem. All of theseincreasefiltering and infiltration ofstormwaterbeforetheflows becomeconcentratedand thisin turn improveswaterqualityandreducesdownstreamrun-offwhichmeanspipes,swales,ditches,andstonuwaterfacilities canbesmaller.

Avoid sendingrun-off from oneimpervioussurfacedirectlyontoanotherimpervioussurface. Placepervioussurfacesbetweenimpervioussurfacesalongthe run-offpath.

If thesite is gradedto dispersethe imperviousrunoff assheetflow throughat least50’ of thick grassorotherthick vegetationor throughat least25’ of existingwoodlands,50%of the imperviousareadrainingthroughthevegetationmaybemodeledasgrassin good conditionwhencalculatingthepostdevelopmentcurvenumber. If the imperviousrunoffis dischargedinto a properlydesignedand constructedbioretentionfacility/rain gardenonsite, 100%ofthe imperviousareadraining to thedevicemaybemodeledasgrassingoodconditionwhencalculatingthepostdevelopmentcurvenumber.

(d) Sheetflow

Maintain sheetflow for as longaspossiblebeforethe run-off hasto becollectedin a stormwaterconveyancesystem. Sheetflow increasesinfiltration and lengthensthe time ofconcentrationwhich in turnimproveswaterqualityand reducesrun-offdownstream.Spreadoutconcentratedflows createdby thedevelopmentbeforetheyaredischargedoffsite usingstilling basins,level spreaders,directingrun-offthroughwoodlands,orothermeanssotherun-off returnsto pre-developmentcharacteristicstomeettheadequacyof outfall provisionofthis ordinanceand to improve waterqualityandreducerun-offdownstream.

(e) Grasschannelsin lieu ofpiping or hardsurfacechannels.

(e) Environmentallysensitivedevelopment

Maintaining/notdisturbingenvironmentallysensitiveareassuchas streams,streambuffers,existingwoodlands,existingsteepslopes,wetlands,etc.,the reductionofcut and fill, excavating,etc. andtheappropriatebalanceof buildingsandparkingon thedevelopmentsite.

(g) Improvementstoand the reductionin the imperviousareason the developmentsite. Designparkinglotswith theminimum amountof hardsurfacerequiredtomeetthe zoningregulations. If additionalparkingareais desire,the Countystronglyencouragesthe employeeand/oroverflow parkingareasto be

27I.

constructedin amoreperviousmaterialthanasphaltor concrete.If theparkingregulationsrequireexcessiveparkingfor your typeofdevelopment,discussthe issuewith theCountyStalE If the CountyStafffeelsareductionin thenumberofrequiredparkingspacesis justified, avariancecanbe submittedtotheBoardofZoning Appealsto reducetheparkingrequirementswhich in turn will reducetheamountofimpervioussurfaceinstalled.

(h) Increaseduseoftrees,shrubsandgroundcover,whichabsorbup to 14 timesmorerainwaterthangrassandrequirelessmaintenance.

Any stormwaterdetentionor retentionpond shall alsobe designedto passthepostdevelopment100 year storm(peakattenuationto the 100 yearpredevelopmentrateis not required)throughthepond without overtoppinganyportionof thedam.This canbe accomplishedthroughtheprincipal spillwayor an emergencyspiilwayor usingboth. Theemergencyspillwayshall beinstalledon virgin soil and isnot to beplacedon fill materialor thedam.If it is not feasibleto placetheemergencyspillway on virgin soil thentheprincipal spillway shallbedesignedfor the 100 yearstorm.

Theoverflowpaththroughthesiteandfrom anystormwatermanagementdevicefor stormwaterrunoffabovethedesignstormevent,shallnotadverselyimpactanyonsitestructuressuchasbuildingsandroadwaystability.

Providehydrauliccalculationsfor stormwaterfacilities sealedby a designprofessionalqualified to preparehydrauliccalculationsin accordancewith State of Tennesseelaw. As a minimum, the calculationsshall includea pre and postdevelopmentdrainagearea map, brief narrative,pre and post developmentrunoff data, and routing calculationstodeterminetheoutflow ratefrom thestormwatermanagementfacility.

Provide location, size, details, and layout of proposedstormwatermanagement.Provide appropriatedetails suchas aprofile throughtheprincipalspiliway with cutoff trench,anti-seepcontrol, trashrackdetails,compactionlbaclcfllldetailsor notes,riserdetail, outletstabilization,andemergencyspillwaydetailfor detentionpondsandotherdetails/sectionsasneededfor the contractorto build thestructures.Thelow flow openingin a riser structureand its overflow shall haveatrashrack to preventthe opening,theriser, and/orthe principal spillway from becomingclogged.The trashracksshall~ be flat acrosstheopenings.

The location and amount of stormwaterrunoff leaving site after construction and from stormwatermanagementmeasuresproposedshouldbe evaluatedto protectadjoining anddownstreampropertiesand existingdrainagefacilitiesand systems.Theplanmustaddresstheadequacyofoutfalls fromthe development.When waterisconcentrated,what isthe capacityof waterwaysand storm drains, if any, acceptingstonnwateroff-site, and what measuresincludinginfiltration, sheetflowing into buffers,outfall setbacks,etc.areto be usedto spreadconcentratedrunoffandpreventthescouringofwaterwaysanddrainageareasoff-site.

Outfall pipes from stormdrainsystemsand storruwatermanagementfacilities shall be setbacksufficiently am offsitepropertiesto allow the concentratedwater to spread out back to pre developmentflow characteristics.Under nocircumstanceshall an outfall pipe, asmeasuredfrom the endsection,headwall,or pipe, if no end structureis used,beany closerthan ten (10) feet from the offsite propertyunlessa drainageeasementfrom theoffsite propertyownerisobtainedandrecorded.Theoutfall setbackshallbe determinedby the designprofessionalandshall bebasedon outflowrateandthereceivingchannelorpipecharacteristics.

Stormwaterdischarge from a concentratedpoint such as a pipe outfall shall dischargeonto rip rap or othervelocity/energydissipatingmethodtoreduceerosionpotential. All rip rapor otherstoneusedtoreducevelocity shallbeplacedon a geotextileto preventscouringandthestonefrom sinkinginto theunderlyingsoil.

D. Maintenance of Stormwater Manaqement Facilities Dreinaoe Plan — Upon final site plan or subdivicion platapproval, the maintenanceof the storniwaterplan shall remainthe reeponsib~ityof the current landowner(s)and shallby no meansbe theeriforoenientduty or maintenanseresponsibilityof the countyexceptfor thosestormwater systemswithin countyrights of wayor other countyo’~inedproperties.

Stormwater management facilities or devices, including detention ponds, which are located in subdivisions,shall be located on a non-buildable lot or within an easement if locatedon a buildable lot. Any existing andproposed easements shall be shown on the construction drawings as well as the recorded final plat. Theconstruction drawings and the final plat shall state who is responsible for the maintenance of the stormwater

U’) .3 imanagement devices The County shall not be responsible for the maintenance of stormwater managementfacilities or devices except for those within County rights-of-way or on other Countyowned properties.

8-103.11 Illicit Discharge and Illegal Dumping — lithe owner/operator of the site or project must design, install,implement, and maintain effective pollution prevention measures to minimize the discharge of pollutants; at aminimum, suchmeasures must be designed, installed, implemented and maintained to:

1. Minimize the discharge of pollutants from equipment and vehicle washing, wheel wash-water, and other washwaters. Wash waters must be treated in a sediment basin or alternative control that provides equivalent or bettertreatment prior to discharge;

2. Minimize the exposure of building materials, building products, construction wastes, trash, landscape materials,fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides, detergents, sanitary waste and other materials present on the site toprecipitation and to stormwater; and

3. Minimize the discharge of pollutants from spills and leaks and implement chemical spill and leak prevention andresponse procedures.

The following discharges are prohibited from construction sites:

1. Wastewater from washout of concrete, unless managed by an appropriate control.

2. Wastewater from washout and cleanout of stucco, paint, form release oils, curing compounds and otherconstruction materials

3. Fuels, oils, or other pollutants used in vehicle and equipment operation and maintenance.

4. Soaps or solvents used in vehicle and equipment washing.

8-1 03.12 Notice of Termination — With the exception of residential subdivision developments, all otherdevelopments and projects that were required to obtain a Genera! Construction Permit with IDEC, shall be requiredto submit a copy of the Notice of Termination letter to the County Staff prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancyfrom the County. Notices of Termination for residential developments shall not be issued until the last home iscompleted. It is the responsibility of the owner/developer to request Notice of Termination.

Text Amendment Approved 05—20—13 20 Aye, 1 Nay, 1 Pass, 1 Absent

liii u

ONS BEFORE THE COMMN.

No.

Roll aItkt~lla~

No.A’ No. No.4,

No.

¼MESOF COMMISSIONERS Aye Nay Aye Nay Aye Nay Aye Nay Aye Nay Aye Nay Aye Nay Aye Nay Aye

A~—_______ /

—- -—

(&~hmAjv/7//-

i~I~I7I2IIIIIIII~~I~

—__~it/_7_V_/

Y/~/~/7///K;°Ai 2

~~~ZI7I2IZIIIIIIIIII

~~Qi7//AhftQLZIZIJIZIIIIIIIIII

LL4k&QJ/ - -

~~‘t~-—----.-----—-t4II~Ia7__~___

-—~

lIONS BEFORE THE COMMN.

No..

~

;. No. No. No.

/

~n.

lAMES OF COMMISSIONERS

~-_/

Aye

—

Nay

~fl-_~

Aye Nay Aye Nay

,&~

Aye

—

Nay

—

Aye

—

Nay

——

Aye Nay

~-=

Aye Nay

-=-=

Aye Nay Aye

W~v~c~_~/

..~~n~L_/~7_

-~-

U

jj~J~//P

I I .~

~TI~!~~±IZIKIII-

L~kth3J(J.//-~~/J

~~I(

/~/

iiIiIiII_

&iL~fw~L_//_

-._~——__-- ~-

JZr:

~k~%4~.~7-v-____-~-____~

LL.~.___

-

/I~5 .

111IIII1:1:+I~I1I~1liJ II

0z

dz

0z

‘aza,

‘C

z

—— TIIIIIIIIIIIIII. Till

a,za,

a,

0z

~

I .— — —~

I

~i———————————————~——————————1111IE.

-

d:kSf-

2:

~~

‘cal ~~‘)

IcZ7”-

I4

~i~1$U~d

THE COMMN.

SE lONE RE

-

-n

Aye Nay

No No. No

Aye Nay Aye Nay

No.

~Nay

—

/V1//1

/

_1___-

1/

4I~2~ --

No ~U ~) .~‘~t

Aye N ay Nay

it__ill J-

NC.. • No.

Aye Nay Aye Nav~Aye ~

117111/

-P7—-

Hif / -~.--

117

icr~//

-—7——-—V..-.

//

i1h1’~i_i_~

1111

di] u RESOLUTIONS ON DOCKET FOR MAY 20, 2013

RESOLUTIONS ACTION#1 AMENDMENTSTO THE SULLIVAN COUNTY ZONINGRESOLUTION

APPROVED05-20-13

#2 APPOINTMENTOF A BOARD MEMBER TO THE INDUSTRIALDEVELOPMENTBOARD OF SULLIVM4 COUNTY

APPROVED —

05-10-13

#3 AUTHORIZETAX RELEASESFORTHE 2011 TAX YEARFROM THE OFFICEOF COUNTYTRUSTEE

APPROVED05-20-13

#4 PLACE 25 MPH SPEEDLIMIT SIGNSON HIGI-ILEA DRIVE INTHE8T11 COMMISSIONERDISTRICT

APPROVED05-20-13

#5 AUTHORIZING ADDITIONAL FUNDING IN THE AMOUNT OF$1,500TOBE APPROPRIATEDFORTHE SULL. COUNTY DEPT.OF ARCHIVES AND TOURISM TO PROMOTEAND CO-SPONSORTHE ANNUAL BAFFLE OF BLOUNTVILLE SESQUICENTENNIALCELEBRATIONSSETFORSEPT.2013

WITHDRAWN05-20-13

#6 TO PROVIDE A 2% RAISEFOR ALL SULL. COUNTYEMPLOYEESRETROACTIVE TO APRIL 1 (INTENTIONALLYOMITI’ING EMPLOYEESRELATED TO SULL. COUNTY’SSHERIFF’SDEPT.AND JAIL DUETOA PREVIOUS SE117LEMENTREACHEDTHROUGHMEDIATION PROVIDING SAID PAYINCREASEFOR AFOREMENTIONEDEMPLOYEES

APPROVED05-20-13

#7 AUTHORIZING SULL. COUNTY TO ENTERINTO GENERALMAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH TN DEPT. OFTRANSPORTATIONFORSAFETY IMPROVEMENTSON SIXROADWAYS IN SULLIVAN COUNTY

APPROVED05-20-13

#8 APPROVEACCEPTANCEOFGRANTS FORPROJECTSATTHETRI-CITIES REGIONAL AIRPORT,TN/VA

APPROVED05-20-13

#9 APPROVEA CASH AND FINANCIAL ASSISTANCEPOLICYFOR SULLIVAN COUNTYEMS IN WORKING WITH THOSEWHOHAVE RECEIVEDSERVICESFROM THIS AGENCY

l~READING05-20-13

#10 APPROVETHELEASEOFFOUR (4) DUMP TRUCKSFORTHE SULLIVAN COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT

APPROVED05-20-13

#11 AUTHORIZEBOND RESOLUTIONFOR SCHOOLREFUNDING BONDS (FEDERALLY TAXABLE) OF SULLIVANCOUNTY, TENNESSEE,IN THE AGGREGATEPRINCIPALAMOUNT OF APPROXIMATELY FOURTENMILLION SEVENHUNDRED SEVENTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($14,770,000).

APPROVED05-20-13

#12 AUTHORIZE NOTE RESOLUTIONFOR INDUSTRIAL APPROVED(BUSINESS)PARK CAPITAL OUTLAY NOTES (FEDERALLY 05-20-13TAXABLE) OF SULLIVAN COUNTY,TENNESSEEIN TIlEAGGREGATEPRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF APPROXIMATELY ONEMILLION ONE HUNDRED FORTY THOUSAND DOLLARS($1,140,000). _______#13 AUTHORIZE BOND RESOLUTIONFOR COUNTY DISTRICT APPROVEDSCHOOLREFUNDINGBONDS(FEDERALLY TAXABLE) OF 05-20-13SULLIVAN COUNTY, TENNESSEE,IN THE AGGREGATEPRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF APPROXIMATELY EIGHTMILLIONONE HUNDRED SIXTY-FIVE TIIOUSAND DOLLARS ($8,165,000). ____— _______

#14 FURIHER EXPAND THE CURRENTDAY WORKER APPROVEDPROGRAM 05-20-13

Sullivan County, TennesseeBoard of CountyCommissioners

Item 1No. 20 13-05-00

To the HonorableSteveM. Godsey,Mayor of Sullivan County, and the Board of SullivanCounty Commissionersmeetingin RegularSessionthis20th day ofMay2013.

RESOLUTION To ConsiderAmendment(s)To The SULLIVAN COUNTY ZONING PLAN:

Zoning Map Or The Zoning Resolution

WHEREAS, the rezoningpetition(s)havebeenduly initiated; havebeenbefore the appropriateRegional PlanningCommission(recommendationsenclosed);and shall receiveapublic hearingasrequiredprior to final action from the CountyCommission;and

WHEREAS, such rezoningpetition(s) and/or the proposedtext amendment(s)will require an

amendmentto the SULLIVAN Co~~ZONING PLAN — Zoning Map or ZoningResolution.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners ofSullivan County, Tennessee,assembledin Regular Sessionhereby consider rezoningpetition(s) and/or the Zoning Resolution Text Amendment(s),conduct the appropriatepublic hearingasrequiredby law, andvoteupon theproposedamendment(s)individually,by roll call vote, and that the vote be valid and binding, and that any necessaryamendments to the official zoning map or resolution code book be made by the Planning &CodesDepartment.

All resolutions in conflict herewith be andthe samerescinded insofar assuch conflict exists.

Duly passedandapprovedthis 20th dayof May 2013.

Aftested: 0Th/ tJ anieGammon,CountyClerk

Sponsor: John CrawfordPrimeCo-Sponsor(s):JohnGardner

. 2OI3~.-O5-OO L County Commission —IlACTION Voice Vote

Notes:

Sullivan County,TennesseeBoard of County Commissioners

Item 2Executive

No. 2013-04-33

Attachment

To the HonorableSteve M. Godsey, Mayor of Sullivan County, and the Board of SullivanCountyCommissionersmeetingin RegularSessionthis 15th day of April, 2013.

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING The Appointment Of A Board Member To The IndustrialDevelopmentBoard Of SullivanCounty

WHEREAS,Th~ffi$$EE~QpE~9QIAIhPS SECTION §7.53-301, authorizesthe governingbody ofthe County to electmembersto serveon the IndustrialDevelopmentBoardof tIe Countyof Sullivan; and

“~/FIEREA5 it hasbecomenecessaryto appointa new boardmemberduetoa vacancyon theboard;and

NOW, THEREFORE,BE yr RESOLVED ThAT the Board of County Commissioners,basedon anominationby the Industrial DevelopmentBoardof Sullivan County,appointsJoe Ilerron to serveatermexpiring March 20,2019.

This resolution shalt take eflèet from and after its passage. All resolutionsin conflict herewithbe andthe santerescindedinsofaras suchconflict exists

Approvedthis 20th dayof Nay ____

SponsoredBy: EddieWilliamsPrime Co-Sponsor(s): John Gardner

2013.

Approved:

2013-04-33 Administrative Budget — Executive CountyCommissionNo Action 4-4-13; Approved 05—20—13

ACTION Approved4-3-13 ,, Approved5-8-13---- -=~ _~1c~ ~

Notes: 1stReading04-15-13;

-J U ~

Attachment To Resolution No. 2013-04-33

JoeHerron — Bio

Born in Birmingham,AlabamaVietnamVeteranwith 10 1stAirborneDivision (1 966-1967)BronzeStarrecipientBS degreein OrganizationalManagementDale CarnegieGraduate- Graduatedwith HighestAward for AchievementRetiredfrom CSX Railroad(35 years) - Managerof IntermodalOperationsRetiredSullivanCountyCommissioner(10 years’service)PresentlySelf-EmployedasaManagementConsultantCo-founderof SullivanCountyCharacterCounts!Coalitionwith JudgeSteveJonesPastPresident- Boardof Directors - CharacterCounts!CoalitionPastPresident- Boardof Directors- CASAPastVP - Boardof Directors- LINK HousePastBoardof Directorswith KingsportTomorrow(ExecutiveCommittee)OrganizedtheMergerof SBK Animal ControlCenterin SullivanCountyChairmanof Boardfor SBKAnimal Control Centerfor 1styearin operationCURRENTLY - SundaySchoolteacherat Higher GroundBaptistChurch

(We invite’ all to comevisit ourclass)

Married- 3 children - 4 grandchildren- 1 greatgrandchild

Item 3Budget

No. 2013-04-34

uj,__ ~j~_)

To the UonorableSteveM. Godsey,Mayor of Sullivan County, and the Boardof Sullivan County Commissionersmeeting in RegularSessionthis 15th day of April, 2013.

RESOLUTIONTo AuthorizeTax ReleasesForThe 2011 Tax YearFromThe Office OfCountyTrustee.

WHEREAS, The Trusteeof Sullivan County, pursuantto Tennesseestatuteswishersto submit the followingcounty tax releases.

NOW ThEREFOREBE IT RESOLVE1)that theBoardof CountyCommissionersof Sullivan County,Tennessee,assembledin RegularSessionherebyreleasestheSullivan County ‘trustee’sOffice of thefollowing amounts(detailsareon file) for the 2011 Tax Year:

Reconciliationof 2011 Tax Rolls

(-520,833.74)(216,090.88)

$ 76,469,87125

TaxesPaid $ 75,282,357.47

Add: TaxesFiled in ChanceryCourt

Total TaxesAccountedForby Trustee

1,187,514.78

$ 76,469,872.25 —

Balance(Difference) $

This resolution shall take effect from andrescindedinsofaras suchconflict exists.

after its passage.All resolutionsin conflict herewith be and the same

Sponsore’ilBy: EddieWilliams

PrimeCo-Sponsor(s):Dwight King

r20130434 Mrnjnjstrative~ Budget Executive County Commission

pprove O5~zULT1~ACTION Approved5-8-13 Approved5-913 ~rov~d5-813 21 4~~~ent

Sullivan County, TennesseeBoard ofCounty Commissioners

2011 Tax Aggregate

Add: Increasesby Assessor

TIF

Less: Releasesby Assessor& State

Adjusted201 I Tax Aggregate

$ 76,701,589.62505,207.25

Approvedthis - 20th dayof _!~Y

Attested:ic Uarnn,en, county Cleik

2013.

ApprovedjCJ1/~~

Notes: 1st Reading04-15-

U U 1uSullivan County,Tennessee

Boardof County Commissioners

Item 4Executive

No. 2013-04-35Attachment

To the HonorableSteve M. Godsey, Mayor of Sullivan County, and the Board of SullivanCountyCommissionersmeetingin RegularSessionthis 18thdayof March2013

RESOLUTION To Place 25 MPH Speed Limit Signs On Highlea Drive In The 8thCommissioner District

WHEREAS,Commissioner Eddie Williams requested the Sullivan CountyHighway Departmentto make this change;and

WHEREAS,theSullivanCountyHighwayDepartmentreviewedthe requestandapprovedsame.

NOWTHEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners ofSullivan County, Tennessee,assembledin Regular Session,hereby authorizesthe followingtraffic sign placementin Sullivan County:

8th Commission District

To Place 25 MPHSpeed Limit SignsOn Highlea Drive

This resolutionshall takeeffect from and after its passage.be andthe samerescindedinsofarassuchconflict exists.

Approvedthis 20th day of Mav

SponsoredBy: EddieWilliamsPrime Co-Sponsor(s): Darlene Calton

J 2013-04-35 Administrative I Budget I Executive

Approved 5-8-13

j County Commission I

[~fT1ON Approved 5-8-13 Approved 5-9-13 Approved 05—20—13I 22 Aye. 1 AbsentII

Attested:

All resolutionsin conflict herewith

Gammon,county Clerk

2013.

Approved:~a-7/6_~._.,.

Notes: 1st Reading04-15-13;

Terty A. ShafferHighwayCommissioner

/AN -,SUL -, NT’!

HIGH ~ - ‘~ ; MENT

BLOUNTV g,1*~1N SEE 37617

147 County Hill Road• Blountville, TNPhone(423)279-2820• Fax (423)276-2876

DATE:

RESOLUTION REQUEST REVIEW

TO: ~//;y~~ eOUNJ/

REQUEST MADE BY:

AJ

~ mPh

COMMISSIONERDISTRICT /2rnz(e ~IoM

___-- APPROVEDBY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT

____ DENIED BY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT

COMMENTS:

SUBJECT: ‘73 t2/MCF

LJq4f~_~J

ATET~AFhCCOORDINATOR - DATE HIGHW45’tOMMISSMNFR

UUUjO~

Sullivan County,TennesseeBoardof County Commissioners

Item 5

Administrative/BudgetiExecutive- No. 2013-05-38

Amendment

To the Honorable Steve M. Godsey, Mayor of Sullivan County, and the Board of SullivanCountyCommissionersmeetingin RegularSessionthis 20thdayof May, 2013.

RESOLUTION Authorizing Additional Funding In The Amount Of $1,500 To BeAppropriated For The Sullivan County Department Of Archives And Tourism ToPromote And Co-Sponsor The Annual Battle Of Blountville Sesquicentennial CelebrationsSet For September 2013.

WHEREAS, the Sullivan County Departmentof Archives and Tourism formed the Battle ofBlountville Re-enactmentCommitteein 2009 in the interestsof promotingheritagetourism inSullivan County and in the interestsof promotingCivil War educationthroughavirtual livinghistory environmentfor areastudents;and

WHEREAS, the Battle of Blountville Civil War Re-Enactmentis a Sullivan County heritagetourism eventsponsoredannuallyby the Sullivan CountyDepartmentof Archives and TourismandtheBattle of Blountville Re-enactmentCommittee;and

WHEREAS, the Battle of Blountville Civil War Re-Enactmentset for September2013, inconjunctionwith theBattle ofBlountville Military ParkExecutiveCommitteeandthe TennesseeDepartmentof Tourism, is aspecialSesquicentennialcelebrationsetto commemoratethe 150thanniversaryof the Battleof Blountville; and

WHEREAS, it has been determinedthat, in order for the Sullivan County DepartmentofArchives and Tourism to promote and co-sponsor the 2013 Battle of BlountvilleSesquicentennialCelebration,additionalfinds of$l,500areneeded.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners ofSullivan County, Tennessee, assembled in Regular Session, hereby appropriate additionalfunding in the amount of $1,500 for the Sullivan County Department of Archives andTourism to promote and co-sponsor the Battle of Blountville Sesquicentennial Celebrationset for September 2013.

This resolution shall take effect from andafter its passage.All resolutionsin conflict herewithhe and the samerescindedinsofaras suchconflict exists.

Approvedthis dayof 20] 1

Attested: Approved:Jeanie Gariiii~on County Clerk Steve M. (Jodsey, County Mayor

SponsoredBy: l~-1atthewJohnson

[‘rime Co-Sponsor(s):Dennisllouser,James“Moe” Brotherton

- Administrative - — Budget Executiv [ County Commission

~

Notes: Withdrawn 05—20—13.

U d U u’J C

AmendmentNo. I To ResolutionNo.2013-05-38

The$1,500.00will be appropriatedfrom theFundBalanceAccount39000to 51910.300,Archives & Tourism.

.‘j-Jc-Jj

Sullivan County,TennesseeBoardof CountyCommissioners

Item 6Adniinistrative/BudgetlExeeutive

No, 2013-05-39

To the Ilonorable Steve M. Godsey, Mayor of Sullivan County, and the Board of SullivanCountyCommissionersmeetingin RegularSessionthis 20th day of May, 2013.

RESOLUTIONTo ProvideA 2% RaiseFor All SullivanCountyEmployeesRetroactiveToApril 1 (Intentionally Omitting Employees Related To Sullivan County’s SheriffsDepartment And Jail Due To A Previous Settlement Reached Through MediationProvidingSaid Pay IncreaseForAforementionedEmployees).

WII[REAS, we, in an effort to be fair and equitable to thoseemployeeswho have thithftllyservedthis Countyof Sullivanandaredeserving;and

WHEREAS,the GENERAL FUND will he affectedapproximately$40,000,including benefitsfor this last quarterin fiscal year2013; and

\-VHERE%AS, the DEPARTMENTSOF HIGHWAY, EMS, PARKS AND SOLID WASFE willfund this raisefrom their currenthudget,ashasheencustomary;and

WHEREAS,thc HEALTH DEPARTMENT will fund this raisefrom grantswhereapplicable,ashasbeencustomary;and

WHEREAS there is no needfbr additional retroactive or further finding for the ShERIFF’SDEPARTMENTor JAIL sincesaidincreasewill alreadyhavebeenprovided.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVEDthat the Board of County CommissionersofSullivan County, Tennessee assembled in regular session hereby authorize a raise of 2%forSullivan County employees, defined above.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVEI) that the Board of Commissionersherebyauthorizethispay raiseto be retroactiveto April 1, 2013andforward.

This resolutionshall takeeffect from andafter its passage.All resolutionsin conflict herewithbe andthesamerescindedinsofaras suchconflict exists.

Approvedthis 20th dayof________________

Attested:~ Approved: ~te~i. Oodse1oun~’”\~

SponsoredBy: Bob WhitePrime Co-Sponsor(s): Cathy Armstrong, Bryan Boyd, Bob Neal,Dwight King,

Terry Harkleroad, Matthew Johnson, Dennis Houser

J 2013-05-39 Administrative Budget —-Executive County CommissionApproved 05—20—13

Approved5-8-13 121 Aye, 1 Nay, 1 Abse t

2013.

ACTION Approved5-8-13 F Approved5-9-13

Notes: Waiver of rules requested.

‘~‘3”

Sullivan County,TennesseeBoardof County Commissioners

Item?Executive

No. 20 13-05-40

To the Honorable SteveM. Godsey,Mayor of Sullivan County, and the Board of SullivanCountyCommissionersmeetingin RegularSessionthis 20thdayof May,2013.

RESOLUTION Authorizing Sullivan County To Enter Into General MaintenanceAgreement With Tennessee Department Of Transportation For Safety Jmprovements OnSix RoadwaysIn Sullivan County

WhEREAS,six (6) countyroadwaysin Sullivan County havebeendesignatedas beinge]igiblefor funds availablethroughthe High Risk Rural RoadsProgramto make safety improvements,said roads being Allison Road, Island Road, Muddy Creek Road, Pickens Bridge Road,]JlooiningdalePikeand Big SpringsRoad; and

WI-IBREAS, the State of TennesseeDepartmentof Transportation(“TDO’F”) has submittedtoSullivan County a proposedmaintenanceagreementrelative to this project, a copy of which isattachedto this Resolution,whereinTDOT agreesto perform specific safety improvementstoeachof the aforesaidroadwaysas set forth in the agreementin exchangefor Sullivan Countymaintaining such improvementsupon completion of the work by TDOT as well as otherobligationsset forth in the agreement;

NOWTHEREFOREBE IT RESOLVEDthat the Board of County CommissionersofSullivan County,Tennessee,assembledin RegularSessionherebyauthorizesthe SullivanCounty Mayor,on behalfof Sullivan County,Tennessee,to enterinto theattachedGeneralMaintenance Agreement with the State of Tennessee Department of Transportationforsafety improvements to Allison Road, Island Road, Muddy Creek Road, Piekens BridgeRoad, Bloomingdalc Pike and Big SpringsRoad.

This resolution shall take effect from andafter its passage.All resolutionsin conflict herewithhe andthe samerescindedinsofaras suchconflict exists.

Approved: ~SieveM Godse County layor

2013-05-40 Administrative Budget Executive County Commission

ACTION Approved 5-8-13 Approved5-9-13 Approved5-8-13 Approved 05—20—13___________ _____ _________ 7i~e I Ahsen~

dayof May 2013.

Sponsored By: Dwight KingPrime Co-Sponsor(s): Ty-leemet’sh4ite Bill Kilgore

Notes: Waiver of rules requested~

U I u 33

SullivanCounty,TennesseeBoardofCountyCommissioners

Item SBudget

No. 2013-05-41

To the HonorableSteve M. Godsey,Mayorof Sullivan County, andthe Board of Sullivan CountyCommissionersmeetingin RegularSessionthis 20th dayof May2013

RESOLUTIONTo Approve Acceptance Of Grants For Projects At The Tn-Cities RegionalAirport, TN/VA

WHEREAS,Federal fiscal year 2013 grantsmay becomeavailablefrom the U. S. Department ofTransportation,FederalAviation Administration to the Tn-Cities Airport 4M~i- for airportimprovementsto theTn-CitiesRegionalAirport, TN/VA; and

WHEREAS,Airport ownersare requiredto formally accept said grantsandauthorizeexecutionofdocumentsrelatingthereto.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,that the Board of County Commissioners of SullivanCounty, Tennessee, assembled in regular session, hereby approves the Tn-City Airport

to enter into Grant Agreements with the United State of America, acting throughthe Federal Aviation Administration, for the purpose of obtaining federal funds to be used forcapital projects at the Tn-Cities Regional Airport, and that the Mayor is authorized to sign anyand all documents necessary to approve and accept said grants.,

This resolutionshall take effect from andafter its passage. All resolutions in conflict herewith be and the samerescinded insofar as such conflict exists.

Approvedthis 20th dayof______________2013.

Atte~ ~air —Approved:

SponsozYd By: Eddie WilliamsPrime Co-Sponsor(s): James “Moe” Brotherton

[72-Os-41 I Administrative

ACTION Approved5-8-13

I Budget

Approved5-9-13

I Executive

Approved5-8-13

I County Commission 1Approved 05—2~13

77 Aye.. 1 Absent

JeanieGammon,CountyClerk

Notes: Waiver of rules requested -

Sullivan County,TennesseeBoandof CountyCommissioners

Item 9Administrative/Budget

No. 2013-05-42Attachment

To the Honorable Steve M. Godsey, Mayor of Sullivan County, and the Board of Sullivan CountyCommissionersmeetingin RegularSessionthis20th dayof May 2013

RESOLUTIONTo Approve A Cash And FinancialAssistancePolicy For Sullivan County EMSIn \Vonking With Those WhoHave Received Services From This Agency

WHEREAS, the documentattachedto this resolution clearly definesthe guidelinesproposedas aresponsiblesetof rulesfor servingall citizensin a fair and equitablemanner;and

WhEREAS, the Sullivan County EMS will continueto servethe region with efficiency, a cleandefinition for financialregulationsneedsto be in place.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Hoard of County Commissionersof SullivanCounty, ‘Tennessee,asscmbledin regular session, hereby approves a Cash And FinancialAssistancePolicy for the Sullivan County EMS to havein place for thosewho receiveassistancefrom thatagency.

This resolutionshall takeeffectfrom and after its passage.All resolutionsin conflict herewithbe and the samerescindedinsofaras suchconflict exists.

Approvedthis dayof 2013.

Attested: ________________ Approved:JeanieGammon,CountyClerk SteveNI. Godsey,CountyMayor

Sponsored By: Eddie WilliamsPrime Co-Sponsor(s): Mark Bowery

L2°5~!Administrativj1_ Bud t,,~j Executive County CommLssion1

Notes: 1st Reading 05—20—13;

Sullivan County E.M.S.Cash and Financial Assistance Policy

Purpose:to providea systematicandequitableway to offer financial assistanceto patientsand/ontheresponsiblepartywhoreceivedEMS servicesfrom theSullivan CountyEMS.

Policy

Thispolicy requirespatientsor financially responsiblepartiesto cooperatewith and avail

themselvesof all available programs (including) Medicaid,workerscompensation,state,and

local programs,which appearto providecoveragefor thoseservices.Only servicesfor whichitis notpossibleto obtain any otherprogramcoveragewill qualify for charitableassistance.

All patientsor financially responsibleparties, regardlessofrace,creed,sex,age,nationalorigin,or financialstatusmayapplyfor charitableassistance.Eachrequestwill bereviewedbaseduponanassessmentofthepatients’and/orfamily’s needs,income,and financial resources.

Changesin the formulathat is usedto setSullivanCounty’seligibility scale(incomeas a

percentageofthe federal poverty guidelines) as well as the net worth to be exempted will berecommendedby theChiefof SullivanCountyEMS.TheSullivanCounty Commissionwill

mkeall final decisions regardingany proposed changesto policy andguidelines.Incomeeligibility scheduleswill beupdatedwhenthenewfederalguidelinesare publishedin thefederalregister.

Whenthe transport generates a claim for payment the flat fee (regardlessof financial need)is$50.00. Thosethat qualify for financialassistanceon servicesprovidedby Sullivan CountyEMS, will receivea discountof 100%(excludingthe first $50.00),for thosewhohaveincomeless than 100%of thefederalpovertylevel. It alsoprovidesa60%reductionin chargesfor those

who areat 101%to 150%ofthefederalpoverty level.Thoseat 151%to 200%will receivea40%reductionin charges.Thoseat 201%to 300%will receivel0% reductionin charges.Anyoneover 301%DOESNOT qualify for any reduction in fees.

(Example—anaveragecall is $630.00)

100%povertyguide=to pay 50.00

101%povertyguide to pay252.00

151%povertyguide=4o pay 378.00

201%povertyguide=topay 567.00

PROCEDURE: Wheneverapatientor financially responsibleparty is approvedfor financial

assistance,theyshouldreapplyeverysix monthsfrom thedateof a completedandapproved

application.At the end of six months,renewalof financial assistancecan be doneby filling out a

new financialncedsapplication,if it is still needed.Patientsor financially responsibleparties

whosefinancialassistanceimprovesare encouraged to notify Sullivan County EMS.

Within sevenbusinessdays following receiptof a completedanddocumentedapplicationfor

financialassistance,SullivanCountyEMS will makea determinationof probableeligibility.SullivanCountyEMS canapproveor disapproverequestswithin the guidelineswithout approval

from the SullivanCountyCommission.Sullivan CountyEMS will maintain inthrmationon theapplicationsreceived,thosedeniedandthoseapprovedalongwith theamountapprovedfor each

applicant.

Individual applicationrequirements:

Requestsfor financial needthr Sullivan CountyEMS will requirea completedFinancialNeed

Form,alongwith anysupportingdocumentssuch asa paycheckstub(datedwithin thelast 60

days),primarybankstatement(datedwithin the last60 days)or tax forms (most recentyears).A

signatureis requiredon all applicationsprior to the evaluation process. Financial assistance willnot be granted if complete andaccurateinfonnationandsupportingdocumentationis not

provided.Any assistancegrantedwill he rescinded if information given on the application is

inaccurateor untrue.The applicationand supportingdocumentationis to be retainedby Sullivan

CountyEMS, through theperiodof eligibility for assistanceandfor at leastoneyearthereafler.

When an estateis beingsettled,the claim remainsvalid in hill andwill notbe reducedto protectassettransfersto heirs.

Applicationsfor financial assistancewill be availablefrom the SullivanCountyEMS atthe

location: 3911 Hwy 126, Blountville, TN.

The decisionto providefinancial assistancehasno bearingon the responsibleparty’s financial

obligationsto otherhealthcareproviders.

Sullivan County shall base its decision upon the suitability of financial assistanceand the amount

of debt forgiveness upon data submitted by the responsible party or other parties as defined

above.

Any oneof the following documentsshallbe consideredsufficientevidenceuponwhich to base

the determinationof financial assistanceeligibility:

A. A W-2 withholding statementfor the mostrecenttaxyear.B. Currentpaystubs(datedwithin the past6 months).

C. An incometax form from the most recent tax year.

D. Formsapprovingordenyingeligibility from Medicaidandbr state-fhndedmedical

assistanceprograms.E. Formsapprovingordenyingunemploymentcompensationorwritten statementsfrom

employersorwelfareagencies.All documentationshallbe forwardedto SullivanCountyEMS to beapprovedand signed by theChiefindicatingeitherapprovalor

denialof financialassistance.

F. A letternotifying theapplicantof SullivanCountyElviS financial assistance

determinationwill be sentby the SullivanCountyEMS.0. Reasonablepaymentarrangements,consistentwith the responsibleparty’s ability to

makepayments,will beextendedfor amountsnot eligible for debtforgiveness,

monthlypayments,without interestmaybe arranged.

H. Financialassistancedeterminationsmadeby theSullivan CountyEMS.I. TheSullivan CountyEMS realizesthat certainpersonsmayhaveno financialmeans

to pay for theirtransportfees,and also lack the social network/family necessary to

helpthemcompletethepaperwork.With suchcases,financialassistancewill beevaluatedon acase-by-easebasis.

The Suffivan County Payment in Full Cash Policy

If aclientcan and will pay hisbheramountduein cash,theSullivanCountyEMS will give a 25%

discountto thoseclients.

If a patientcan pay their account in flu! in two cash payments a 10%discountwill be offered. If

anyofthearrangements mentioned abovearemade,and thepatientor responsibleparty fails toadhereto such terms,theamounton theaccountadheresbackto theoriginal fees.

Sullivan County,TennesseeBoard of CountyCommissioners

Item 10Budget/Executive

No, 2013-05-43Attachment

To the 1-lonorablc Steve M. Godscy, Mayor of Sullivan County, and the Board of Sullivan CountyCommissionersmeetingin RegularSessionthis 20thdayof May 2013

RESOLUTION To Approve The LeaseOf Four (4) Dump Trucks For Tue Sullivan CountyHighway 1)epartnient

WHEREAS, the Sullivan County PurchasingAgent hassolicited on the open marketandobtainedcompetitivepricing on four (4) single-axle dump trucks for the Sullivan County Highway Department.Four (4) used dump trucks will be traded for a total trade-in value of $12,000.00per attachedinformation; and

WHEREAS, the Sullivan County Highway Commissioner desires to purchase these four (4) dumptruckson an annual lease payment as the Ilighway Department does not have sufficient capital funds inanyoneyearto purchasethesetrucks.

NOW, T!IEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that theBoard of CountyCommissionersof SullivanCounty, Tennessee,assembledin regular session,hereby approvesan annuallease/purchaseobligating $62,025.82 per year for five (5) yearsfor a total of $310,129.10@2.4% interestratewith the first payment being made from the 2013-2014 budget.

WaiverOfRulesRequested

This resolution shall takeeffect from and after its passage. All resolutions in conflict herewith be and the samerescindedinsofarassuch conflict exists.

Attested

SponsoredBy: CathyArmstrongPrimeCo-Sponsor(s):Terry Ilarkieroad

- 2012-05-43 Administrative

ACTION

Budget Executive L CountyCommission~&pproved05—20—13‘fl A’... 1 U.-..’. 1 Jent

Approvedthis 20th dayof ____________ 2013

lie Gammon, county clerkApproved: .2 ~

..--~5teveM. Godsey, ounty Ma r

Notes:

COST ANALYSIS

LEASE PURCHASE: FOUR (4) NEW SINGLE AXLE DUMP TRUCKS

S

S 3,00o.Oo

s- 4ooo. Cv

s~~__4000. 00

s 1~l,Oorj.CO

OPTION 1-48 MONTH LEASE PURCHASE

ANNUAL LEASE PURCHASE PAYMENT: -

MANUFACTURER/MODEL YOU ARE PROPOSING:

CAB AND CHASSIS: ac/V Fh’f ,C’hvwM flu; /9~DUMP BODY: i2owns tf4,JIIM cit//4,/6

THE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT OFFERS THE FOLLOWING DUMP TRUCKS FOR TRADE-IN:

TRADE-IN VAUJE

3’ OOO~Do

1 1987CMC yIN: 1GDM7D1YSI-1V512971MILEAGE: 309,734

2 1987GMC yIN: 1G0M701Y5HV512873MILEAGE: 262,574

3 1990GMC yIN: 1GDM7D1Y6LVS1OZ93MILEAGE: 251,393

4 1928 GMC yIN: 1GDM7D1YSJVS11O48MILEAGE: 282,684

GRAND TOTAL TRADE-IN VALUE (ALL 4 UNITS)

UNIT COST OF PROPOSED TRUCK (INCLUDING DEUVERY): $ 16, 270. 00

TOTAL PURCHASE PRICE (4 DUMP TRUCKS): $ 307, 080. 00LESSTRADE-IN . (S /~006. 00GRAND TOTAL PURCHASE PRICE $ ~ 95’ 010. Co

Qo— lie L)4.Vs 4F16( g~i,’r of O.10t4AVAILABILITY:

Sullivan County,TennesseeBoardof CountyCommissioners

Item iiBudgct

No. 2013-05-44

To the Honorable Steve M. Godsey, Mayor of Sullivan County, and thc Board of SullivanCountyCommissionersmeetingin RegularSessionthis 20thdayof May, 2013.

RESOLUTION To Authorize Bond Resolution For School Refunding Bonds (FederallyTaxable) Of Sullivan County, Tennessee,In The Aggregate Principal Amount OfApproximatelyFourteenMillion SevenHundredSeventyThousandDollars ($14,770,000).

WHEREAS, pursuantto the authority grantedby TcnnesseeCode Annotated,Scction TCA-9-21-101 et, ~çq.,SuLlivan County, Tennesseehastheauthority to issueSchool RefundingBonds,Series2013, in the approximateaggregateamount of fourteen million sevenhundred seventythousand dollars ($14,770,000); and

WHEREAS, the Countyhas the authority to makeprovisionsfor the issuance,sale,andpaynlentolsaidbonds.

NOW THEItFJ1O1tEBE I’l’ RESOLVEJ) that it is the intention of the Sullivan CountyBoard of Commissioners assembled in Regular Session, to adopt said bond resolution forthe purpose of authorizing approximately fourteen million seven hundred seventythousand dollars ($14,770,000) in aggregate principal amount of said bonds.

BE IT RESOLVEDthat Sullivan County Board of Commissionersdoeshereby approvethe Resolution for the Issuance of Bonds, including the corresponding Refunding EscrowAgreement, and the Bond Purchase Agreement in their entirety (separate handoutprovided), thereby establishing the terms thereof and the disposition of proceedstherefrom; and providing for the levy of taxes for the payment of principal of, premium, ifany, and interest thereon.

BE IT FURThER RESOLVEDthat the Board of County Commissioners herebyauthorizes the Sullivan County Mayor to proceed with the execution of said documents.

WaiverOfRulesRequested

‘-IWi .ufl

This resolutionshall take effect from andafter its passage.All resolutionsin conflict herewithbe andthesamerescindedinsofaras suchconflict exists.

________ ________ 2013.

Approved:

2013-05-44 Administrative Budget Executive County Commission

ACHON jApproved22 A,~,

05—20—131 A1,0~~t

Approvedthis 20th day of________

Attesta~~~JflLt

Sponsored By: Eddie WilliamsPrime Co-Sponsor(s): Mark Bowery, Bob White

Notes:

U ~

STATE OF TENNESSEECOMPTROLLER OF THE TREASURY

OFFICE OF STATE AND LOCAL FINANCESUITE 1600 JAMES K. POLK STATE OFFICE BUILDING

505 DEADERICI( STREETNASHVILLE, TENNESSEE 37243-1402

PHONE (615) 401-7872

FAX (615)741-5986

May 20, 2013

Honorable Steve Godsey, County MayorSullivan County3411 Highway 126, Suite 202Blountville, TN 37617

Dear Mayor Godsey:

This letter acknowledges receipt on May 9, 2013, of a request to review a plan of refunding (the “Plan”) for theissuance of an amount not to exceed $14,770,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2013 (Taxable)(the “2013 Refunding Bonds”), to advance refund by competitive sale an estimated $13,115,000 GeneralObligation School Refunding Bonds) Series 2005 (the “Refunded Bonds”).

Pursuant to the provisions of Tennessee Code Annotated Title 9 Chapter 21, a plan must be submitted to ourOffice for review prior to the adoption of a resolution by the governing body of a local government authorizingthe issuance of refunding bonds secured, in whole or in part, by the full faith and credit and unlimited taxingpower of the County. The information presented in the Plan includes the assertions of the County and may notreflect either current market conditions or market conditions at the time of sale.

FINANCIAL PROFESSIONALS

The County has reported Stephens Inc. as its municipal advisor, Municipal advisors have a fiduciaryresponsibility to the County. Underwriters have no fiduciary responsibility to the County. They represent theinterests of their firm and are not required to act in the County’s best interest without regard to their own orother interests. The Plan was prepared by the County with the assistance of its municipal advisor.

COUNTY’S PROPOSED REFuNDING OBJECTIVE

The 2013 Refunding Bonds are being issued at taxable interest rates for debt service savings. 1 he Plan estimatesnet present value savings of $1,267,001 or 9.66% of the refunded principal (excluding any contingencies).

COMPLIANCE WITH THE COUNTY’S DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY

The County provided a copy of its debt management policy. A specific description of how the debt complies withthe County’s debt policy should be included on the form CT-0253 to be submitted within 45 days of issuance ofthe debt approved in this letter. If the most current version is on file with this office, a copy does not have to besubmitted.

U d ~;~ 0

Letter to Sullivan countyPage I 2

REPORT OF THE REVIEW OF A PLAN OF REFUNDING

This letter, report, and the Plan are to be placed on the County’s website. The same report is to be provided toeach member of the County Commission and reviewed at the Public Meeting at which the proposed refundingbond resolution will be presented as required by TENN. CODE ANN. § 9-21-903.

The enclosed report does not constitute approval or disapproval for the proposed plan or a determinationthat a refunding is advantageous or necessary nor that any of the outstanding obligations should be called forredemption on the first or any subsequent available redemption date or remain outstanding until theirrespective dates of maturity. This letter and the enclosed report do not address the compliance with federaltax regulations and are not to be relied upon for that purpose. The County should discuss these Issueswith abond counsel.

This report is effective for a period of one hundred and twenty (120) days. lithe refunding has not beencompleted during this time, a supplemental plan of refunding must be submitted to this Office, at that time wewill issue a report thereon pursuant to the statutes. In lieu of submitting a supplemental plan, a statement maybe submitted to our Office after the 120-day period has elapsed stating that the information contained in thecurrent plan of refunding remains valid, Such statement must be submitted by either the Chief Executive Officeror the Chief Financial Officer of the local government We will acknowledge receipt of such statement and willissue our letter confirming that this refunding report remains valid for an additional 120-day period. However,with regard to the report currently being issued by this Office, during the initial 120-day periodorany subsequent120-day period no refunding reports will be issued relating to the debt obligations indicated herein as beingrefunded unless the Chief Executive Officer or the Chief Financial Officer notifies our Office that the plan ofrefunding which has been submitted is no longervalid.

We recognize that the information provided in the plan submitted to our Office is based on preliminary analysisand estimates, and that actual results will be determined by market conditions at the time of sole of the debtobligations. However, if it is determined prior to the issuance of these obligations that the actual results will besignificantly different from the information provided in the plan which has been submitted, and the localgovernment determines to proceed with the issue, our Office should subsequently be notified by either the ChiefExecutive Officer or the Chief Financial Officer of the local government regarding these differences, and that thelocal government was aware of the differences and determined to proceed with the issuance of the debtobligations. Notification to our Office will be necessary only if there is an increase or decrease of greater thanfifteen percent (15%) in any of thefollowing: (1) the principal amount of thedebt obligations issued; (2) the costsof issuance; (3) the cumulative savings or loss with regard to any refunding proposaL We consider thisnotification necessary to insure that this Office and officials of the local government are oware of any significantchanges that occur with regard to the issuance of the proposed indebtedness.

‘U I L.’ ¼)

Letter to Sullivan CountyPage 3

Report on Debt Obligation

We are enclosing a revised State Form CT-0253, Report on Debt Obligation. Pursuant to TENN. CODE ANN. § 9-21-151, this Form is to be completed and filed with the governing body of the City no later than forty-five (45]days after the issuance of this debt, with a copy (including attachments, if any) filed with the Director of theOffice of State and Local Finance by mail to the address on this letterhead or by email tostateandlocalfinance.publicdebtform~cot,tn,gov No public entity may enter into additional debt if it has failedto file the Report on Debt Obligation. A fillable PDF of Form CT-0253 can be found athttp://www.coni ptrnller.t n.gov/sl/Pu bclebt~p.

Sincerely, -

~ D3ag~Mary-Margaret CollierDirector of the Office of State & Local Finance

Cc: Mr. Jim Arnette, Director of Local Government Audit, COTMr. Bill Anderson, Sullivan CountyMr. Tom McAnulty, Stephens Inc.Mr. Ashley McAnulty, Stephens Inc.

Enclosures (2): Report of the Director of the Office of State & Local FinanceState Form CT-02S3, Report on Debt Obligation

Ud~uo

REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF STATE AND LOCAL FINANCECONCERNING THE PROPOSED ISSUANCE OF

GENERAL OBUGATION REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2013SULLIVAN COUNTY, TENNESSEE

Sullivan County (the “County”) submitted a plan of refunding (the ‘i’lan”), as required by Tennessee Code Annotated Section 9-21-903 regarding an issuance of an amount not to exceed $14,770,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2013(Taxable) (the “2013 Refunding Bonds”), to advance refund by competitive sale an estimated $13,115,000 General ObligationSchool Refunding Bonds, Series 2005 (the “Refunded Bonds”).

COUNTY’S PROPOSED REFUNDING OBJECTIVE

The County indicated in its Plan that its purpose for the refunding is for debt service savings.

REFUNDING ANALYSIS

• The results for the refunding are based on the assumption that an estimated $14,770,000 series 2013 Refunding Bondswill be sold by competitive sale priced at a par.

• Pursuant to federal tax regulations, the 2013 Refunding Bonds will be sold at taxable interest rates because thisrefunding will be the second advance refunding of the bonds.

• The estimated net present value savings of the refunding is $1,267,007 or 9.66% of the Refunded Bonds.• The average coupon is reduced from 5.09% on the Refunded Bonds to 1.80% for the 2013 Refunding Bonds.• The 2013 Refunding Bonds do not extend the maturity schedule of the Refunded Bonds.• Estimated cost of issuance ol the 2013 Refunding Bonds is $152,949 or $10.36 per $1,000 bond. See Table I for

individual costs of issuance.Table 1

Cost of Issuance of GO Refunding Bonds, Series 2013Price per

Amount $1,000 bondUnderwriter’s Discount $ 84,927.50 $ 5.75 *

Financial Advisor 26,399.00 1.79Bond Counsel 19,250.00 1.30Other costs 22,372.00

$152,948.50 $ 10.36

The County has identified Stephens Inc. as its municipal advisor. MUnicipal advisors have a fiduciary responsibility to you, theissuer. Underwriters have no fiduciary responsibility to you. They represent the interests of their firm.

This report of the Office of State and Local Finance does not constitute approval or disapproval by the Office for the Plan or adetermination that a refunding is advantageous or necessary nor that any of the refunded obligations should be called forredemption on the first or any subsequent available redemption date or remain outstanding until their respective dates ofmaturity. This report is based on information as presented in the Plan by the County. The assumptions included in theCounty’s Plan may not reflect either current market conditions or market conditions at the time of sale.

This report does not provide broad approval to refund the Refunded Bonds In a bond issue other than the proposed 2013Refunding Bonds. If all of the Refunded Bonds are not refunded as a part of the 2013 RefundIng Bonds, then a new plan mustbe submitted to this Office for review.

3ar~lie~Director of the Office of State and Local Finance

1.51

Total Cost of Issuance* Subject to competitive bid

Date: May 20, 2013

Udbuo..

Sullivan County,Tennessee

Board of CountyCommissioners

Item 12Budget

No. 2013.05-45

To the Honorable Steve M. Godsey,Mayor of Sullivan County, and the Board of SullivanCountyCommissionersmeetingin RegularSessionthis 20thdayof May, 2013.

RESOLUTION ‘Jo Authorize Note Resolution For Industrial (Business) Park CapitalOutlay Notes (Federally ‘taxable) Of Sullivan County, Tennessee, In The AggregatePrincipal Amount Of Approximately One Million One Hundred Forty Thousand Dollars($1,140,000).

WHEREAS,pursuant to the authority grantedby TennesseeCode Annotated,Section TCA-9-21-601 et. ~çq.,SullivanCounty, Tennesseehasthe authority to issueIndustrial (Business)ParkCapital Outlay Notes, Series2013, in the approximateaggregateamountof one million onehundredforty thousanddollars ($1,140,000);and

W}IEREAS, the Countyhas the authority to makeprovisionsfor the issuance,sale,andpaymentof said notes.

NOW TI-IFREFORE BE IT RESOLVEI) that it is the intention of the Sullivan CountyBoard of Commissioners assembled in Regular Session, to adopt said note resolution forthe purpose of authorizing approximately one million one hundred forty thousand dollars($1,140,000) in aggregate principal amount of said notes.

BE IT RESOLVED that Sullivan County Board of Commissioners does hereby approvethe Resolution for the Issuanceof Notes, including the correspondingRefundingEscrowAgreement, and the Note Purchase Agreement in their entirety (separate handoutprovided), thereby establishing the terms thereof and the disposition of proceedstherefrom; and providing for the levy of taxes for the payment of principal of, premium, ifany, andinterestthereon.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners herebyauthorizes the Sullivan County Mayor to proceed with the execution ofsaid documents.

WaiverOfRulesRequested

UUUJ

This resolutionshall takeeffect from and after its passage.All resolutionsin conflict herewithbe and thesamerescindedinsofarassuchconflict exists.

Approvedthis 20I-h dayof_______________2013.

~ ~

SponsoredBy: EddieWilliamsPrimeCo-Sponsor(s):Mark Bowery,Bob White

2013-05-45 Administrative Budget Executive CountyCommission

Lt~T1ON I Approved 05—20—13122 Aye, 1 Absent

Notes:

U J ~ u /

STATE OF TENNESSEECOMPTROLLER OF THE TREASURY

OFFICE OF STATE AND LOCAL FINANCESUITE 1600 JAMES K. POLK STATE OFFICE BUILDING

505DEADERICK STREETNASHVILLE, TENNESSEE 37243-1402

PHONE (615) 401-7872FAX (615) 741-5986

May 20, 2013

Honorable Steve Godsey, County MayorSullivan County3411Highway 126, Suite 202Blountville, TN 37617

Dear Mayor Godsey:

This letter acknowledges receipt on May 9, 2013, of a request to review a plan of refunding (the “Plan”) for theissuance of an amount not to exceed $1,140,000 General Obligation Refunding Capital Outlay Notes (Taxable),Series 2013 (the “2013 Refunding Notes”), to refund by competitive sale an estimated $1,100,000 GeneralObligation Industrial Park Capital Outlay Notes, Series 2005 (the “Refunded Notes”).

Approval to issue capital outlay notes must be received from this office prior to the issuance of the Notes. Pleasesend the resolution to this office after passage along with a request lorapproval.

Pursuant to the provisions of Tennessee Code Annotated Title 9 Chapter 21, a plan must be submitted to ourOffice for review prior to the adoption of a resolution by the governing body of a local government authorizingthe issuance of refunding notes secured, in whole or in part, by the full faith and credit and unlimited taxingpower of the County. The information presented in the Plan includes the assertions of the County and may notreflect either current market conditions or market conditions at the time of sale.

FINANCIAL PROFESSIONALS

The County has reported Stephens Inc. as its municipal advisor. Municipal advisors have a fiduciaryresponsibility to the County. underwriters have no fiduciary responsibility to the County. They represent theinterests of their firm and are not required to act in the County’s best interest without regard to their own orother interests. The Plan was prepared by the County with the assistance of its municipal advisor.

COUNTY’S PROPOSED REFUNDING OBJECTIVE

The 2013 Refunding Notes are being issued for debt service savings. The Plan estimates net present valuesavings of $80,157 or 7.29% of the refunded principal.

jju~i~

Letter to Sullivan CountyPage I 2

COMPLIANCE WITH THE COUNTY’S DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY

The County provided a copy of its debt management policy. A specific description of how the debt complies withthe County’s debt policy should be included on the form CT-0253 to be submitted within 45 days of issuance ofthe debt approved in this letter. If the most current version is on file with this office a copy does not have to besubmitted.

REPORT OF THE REVIEW OF A PLAN OF REFUNDING

This letter, report, and the Plan are to be placed on the County’s website. The same report is to be provided toeach member of the County Commission and reviewed at the Public Meeting at which the proposed refundingbond resolution will be presented as required by TENN. CODE ANN. § 9-21-903.

The enclosed report does not constitute approval or disapproval for the proposed plan or a determinationthat a refunding is advantageous or necessary nor that any of the outstanding obligations should be called forredemption on the first or any subsequent available redemption date or remain outstanding until theirrespective dates of maturity. This letter and the enclosed report do not address the compliance with federaltax regulations and are not to be relied upon for that purpose. The County should discuss these issues with abond counsel.

This report is effective for a period of one hundred and twenty (120) days. If the refunding has not beencompleted during this time, a supplemental plan of refunding must be submitted to this Office, at that time wewill issue a report thereon pursuant to the statutes. In lieu of submitting a supplemental plan, a statement maybe submitted to our Office after the 120-day period has elapsed stating that the information contained in thecurrent plan of refunding remains valid. Such statement must be submitted by either the Chief Executive Officeror the Chief Financial Officer of the local government We will acknowledge receipt of such statementand willissue our letter confirming that this refunding report remains valid for an additional 120-day period. However,with regard to the report currently being issuedby this Office, during the initial 120-day periodor any subsequent120-day period no refunding reports will be issued relating to the debt obligations indicated herein as beingrefunded unless the Chief Executive Officer or the Chief Financial Officer notifies our Office that the plan ofrefunding which has been submitted is no longer valid.

We recognize that the information provided in the plan submitted to our Office is based an preliminaryonalysisand estimates, and that actual results will be determined by market conditions at the time of sale of the debtobligations. However, if it is determined prior to the issuance of these obligations that the actual results will beaIgjiiJica!2t1 different from the information provided in the plan which has been submitted, and the localgovernment determines to proceed with the issue, our Office should subsequently be notified by either the ChiefExecutive Officer or the Chief Financial Officer of the local government regarding these differences, and that thelocal government wos aware of the differences and determined to proceed with the issuance of the debtobligations. Notification to our Office will be necessary only if there is on increase or decrease of greater thanfifteen percent (15%) in any of thefollowing: (1) theprincipal amount of thedebtobligations issued; (2) the costsof issuance; (3) the cumulative savings or loss with regard to any refunding proposal. We consider thisnotification necessary to insure that this Office and off icials of the local government are aware of any significantchanges that occur with regard to the issuance of the proposed indebtedness.

ULJh ~ 7,

Letter to Suffivan CountyPage~3

Report on Debt Obligation

We are enclosing a revised State Form CT-02S3, Report on Debt Obligation. Pursuant to TENN. CODE ANN. ~ 9-21-151, this form is to be completed and filed with the governing body of the City no later than forty-five (45)days after the issuance of this debt, with a copy (including attachments, if any} filed with the Director of theOffice of State and Local finance by mail to the address on this letterhead or by email tostateandlocalfinance.publicdebtform~cot.tn.gov No public entity may enter into additional debt if it has failedto file the Report on Debt Obligation. A fillable PDF of Form CT-0253 can be found athttp://www.com ptrolle r.tn.gov/sl/pu bde bt . asp.

Sincerely,

7.f)2ttgt~tC4t1Mary-Margaret CollierDirector of the Office of State & Local Finance

Cc: Mr. Jim Arnette, Director of Local Government Audit, COTMr. Bill Anderson, Sullivan CountyMr. Tom McAnulty, Stephens Inc.Mr. Ashley McAnulty, Stephens Inc.

Enclosures (2): Report of the Director of the Office of State & Local FinanceState Form CT-0253, Report on Debt Obligation

Li U ~ I

REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF STATE AND LOCAL FINANCECONCERNING ThE PROPOSED ISSUANCE OF

GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING CAPITAL OUTLAY NOTES, SERIES iotaSULU VAN COUNTY, TENNESSEE

Sullivan County (the “County”) submitted a planof refunding (the “Plan”), as required by Tennessee CodeAnnotated Section 9-21-903 regarding an issuance of an amount not to exceed $1,140,000 General Obligation Refunding Capital Outlay Notes, Series2013 (the ‘2013 Refunding Notes”), to refund by competitive sale an estimated $1,100,000 General Obligation Industrial ParkCapital Outlay Notes, Series 2005 (the “Refunded Notes”).

COUNTY’S PROPOSED REFUNDING OBJECTIVE

The County indicated in its Plan that its purpose for the refunding is for debt service savings.

REFUNDING ANALYSIS

• The results for the refunding are based on the assumption that an estimated $1,140,000 series 2013 Refunding Noteswill be sold by competitive sale priced at a par.

• The Notes will be sold at taxable interest rates as were the original notes.• The estimated net present value savings of the refunding is $80,157 or 7.29% of the Refunded Notes.• The average coupon is reduced from 5.02% on the Refunded Notes to 0.75% for the 2013 Refunding Notes.• The 2013 Refunding Notes do not extend thematurity schedule of the Refunded Notes.• Estimated cost of issuance of the 2013 Refunding Notes is $19,886 or $17.44 per $1,000 of par amount. See Table 1 for

individual costs of issuance.

Table 1Costof Issuance of 2013 Refunding Notes

Price perAmount $1,000 bond

Underwriter’s Discount $ 6,270.00 $ 5.50 *

Financial Advisor 3,687.00 3.23Bond Counsel 8,000.00 7.02Other costs 1.929,00 1-69

$ 19,886.00 $ 17.44

The County has identified Stephens Inc. as its municipal advisor. MunIcipal advisors have a fiduciary responsibility to you, theissuer. Underwriters have no fiduciary responsibility to you. They represent the interests of their firm.

This report of the Off ice of State and Local Finance does not constitute approval ordIsapproval by the Office for the Plan oradetermination that a refunding Is advantageous or necessary nor that any of the refunded obligations should be called forredemption on the first or any subsequent available redemption date or remain outstandIng until their respective dates ofmaturity. This report is based on information as presented In the Plan by the County. The assumptions Included In theCounty’s Plan may not reflect either current market conditions or market conditIons at the time of sale.

This report does not provide broad approval to refund the Refunded Notes In a bond issue other than the proposed 2013Refunding Notes. If all of the Refunded Notes are not refunded as a part of the 2013 Refunding Notes, then a new plan mustbe submitted to this Office for review.

Ma4MaI~aretC~Uier~Director of theOffice of State and Local FinanceDate: May 20, 2013

Total Cost of IssuanceSubject to competitive bid

* - ,

bj ,j .j ‘~

Sullivan County,TennesseeBoardof County Commissioners

Item 13Budget

No. 2013-05-46

To the 1-lonorableSteve M. Godsey, Mayor of Sullivan County, and the Board of SullivanCountyCommissionersmeetingin RegularSessionthis20th dayof May, 2013.

RESOLUTION To Authorize Bond Resolution For County District School RefundingBonds (Federally Taxable) Of Sullivan County, Tennessee,In The AggregatePrincipalAmount Of Approximately Eight Million One Hundred Sixty-five Thousand Dollars($8,165,000).

WI-IEREAS, pursuantto the authority grantedby TennesseeCode Annotated,SectionTCA-9-2 1-101 et. ~ Sullivan County, Tennesseehasthe authorityto issue County District SchoolRefunding Bonds, Series 2013, in the approximateaggregateamount of eight million onehundredsixty-five thousanddollars($S,165,000);and

WHEREAS, the Countyhasthe authorityto makeprovisionsfor the issuance,sale,andpaymentof saidbonds.

NOW ThEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that it is the intention of the Sullivan CountyBoard of Commissionersassembledin RegularSession,to adopt said bond resolution forthe purpose of authorizing approximately eight million one hundred sixty-five thousanddollars ($8,165,000) in aggregate principal amount of said bonds.

BE IT RESOLVEDthat Sullivan County Board of Commissioners does hereby approvethe Resolution for the Issuance of Bonds, including the corresponding Refunding EscrowAgreement, and the Bond Purchase Agreement in their entirety (separate handoutprovided), thereby establishing the terms thereof and the disposition of proceedstherefrom; and providing for the levy of taxes for the payment of principal of, premium, ifany, and interest thereon.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners herebyauthorizesthe Sullivan County Mayor to proceedwith the execution of said documents.

WaiverOfRulesRequested

[~i3.os46 Executive I CountyCommission

ACTI[ Budget ~Approved 05—20—13 177 1 A1~cnnt

This resolutionshall take effect from and after its passage. All resolutions in conflict herewithbe and the same rescinded insofar as such conflict exists.

Approvedthis2’~20th dayof Nay 2013.

Attested. ____________________ Approved:came Gammon,Countytierk

Sponsored By; Eddie WilliamsPrime Co-Sponsor(s): Mark Bowery, Bob White

Notes:

~.) U ., ¼)/

STATEOFTENNESSEECOMPTROLLER OF THE TREASURY

OFFICE OF STATE AND LOCAL FINANCESUITE 1600 JAMES K. POLK STATE OFFICE BUILDING

505 DEADERICK STREETNASHVILLE, TENNESSEE 37243-1402

PHONE (615) 401-7872FAX (615) 741-5986

May 20, 2013

Honorable Steve Godsey, County MayorSullivan County3411 Highway 126, Suite 202Blountville, TN 37617

Dear Mayor Godsey:

This letter acknowledges receipt on May 9, 2013, of a request to review a plan of refunding (the ‘Plan”) for theissuance of an amount not to exceed $8,165,000 General Obligation County District School Refunding Bonds,Series 2013 (Taxable) (the “2013 Refunding Bonds”), to advance refund by competitive sale an estimated$7,230,000 General Obligation county School District Refunding Bonds, Series 2004 (the “Refunded Bonds”).

Pursuant to the provisions of Tennessee Code Annotated Title 9 Chapter 21, a plan must be submitted to ourOffice for review prior to the adoption of a resolution by the governing body of a local government authorizingthe issuance of refunding bonds secured, in whole or in part, by the full faith and credit and unlimited taxingpower of the County. The information presented in the Plan includes the assertions of the County and may notreflect either current market conditions or market conditions at the timeof sale.

FINANCIAL PROFESSIONALS

The County has reported Stephens Inc. as its municipal advisor. Municipal advisors have a fiduciaryresponsibility to the County. Underwriters have no fiduciary responsibility to the County. They represent theinterests of their firm and are not required to act in the County’s best interest without regard to their own orother interests. The Plan was prepared by the County with the assistance of its municipal advisor.

COUNTY’S PROPOSED REFUNDING OBJECTIVE

The 2013 Refunding Bonds are being issued at taxable interest rates for debt service savings. The Plan estimatesnet present value savings of $356,294 or 4.93% of the refunded principal (excluding any contingencies).

COMPLIANCE WITH THE COUNTY’S DEBT MANAGEMENT POUCY

The County provided a copy of its debt management policy. A specific description of how the debt complies withthe County’s debt policy should be included on the form CT-0253 to be submitted within 45 days of issuance ofthe debt approved in this letter. If the most current version is on file with this office, a copy does not have to besubmitted. -

UJ-u~IJ

Letter to Sullivan CountyPage 2

REPORT OF THE REVIEW OF A PLAN OF REFUNDING

This letter, report, and the Plan are to be placed on the County’s website. The same report is to be provided toeach member of the County Commission and reviewed at the Public Meeting at which the proposed refundingbond resolution will be presented as required by TENN. CODE ANN. § 9-21-903.

The enclosed report does not constitute approval or disapproval for the proposed plan or a determinationthat a refunding is advantageous or necessary nor that any of the outstanding obligations should be called forredemption on the first or any subsequent available redemption date or remain outstanding until theirrespective dates of maturity. This letter and the enclosed report do not address the compliance with federaltax regulations and are not to be relied upon for that purpose. The County should discuss these issues with abond counsel.

This report is effective for a period of one hundred and twenty (120) days. If the refunding has not beencompleted during this time, a supplemento! plan of refunding must be submitted to this Office, at that time wewill issue a report thereonpursuant to the statutes. In lieu of submitting a supplemental plan, a statement maybe submitted to our Office after the 120-day period has elapsed stating that the information contained in thecurrent plan of refunding remains valid. Such statement must be submitted by either the Chief Executive Officeror the Chief Financial Officer of the local government. We will acknowledge receipt of such statement and willissue our letter confirming. that this refunding report remains validfor an odditiona! 120-day period. However,with regard to the report currently being issued by this Office, during the initial 120-day period orany subsequent120-day period no refunding reports will be issued relating to the debt obligations indicated herein as beingrefunded unless the Chief Executive Officer or the Chief Financial Officer notifies our Office that the plan ofrefunding which has been submitted is no longervalid.

We recognize that the information provided in the plan submitted to our Office is based on preliminary analysisand estimates, and that actual results will be determined by market conditions at the time of sale of the debtobligations. However, ‘fit is determined prior to the issuance of these obligations that the actual results will besignificantly different from the information provided in the plan which has been submitted, and the localgovernment determines to proceed with the issue, our Office should subsequently be notified by either the ChiefExecutive Officer or the Chief Financial Officer of the local government regarding these differences, and that thelocal government was aware of the differences and determined to proceed with the issuance of the debtobligations. Notification to our Office will be necessary only if there is an increase or decrease of greater thonfifteenpercent (15%) in any of the following: (1) the principal amount of the debt obligations issued; (2) the costsof issuance; (3) the cumulative savings or lass with regard to any refunding proposal. We consider thisnotification necessary to insure that this Office and officials of the local governmen tore aware of any significantchanges that occur with regard to the issuance of theproposed indebtedness.

U U J

letter to Sullivan CountyPage I 3

Report on Debt Obligation

We are enclosing a revised State form CF-0253, Report on Debt Obligation. Pursuant to TLNrt CODE ANN. § 9-21-151, this form is to be completed and filed with the governing body of the City no later than forty-five (45)days after the issuance of this debt, with a copy (including attachments, if any) filed with the Director of theOffice of State and Local Finance by mail to the address on this letterhead or by email to~i~an~iocaibnance.ublIcdebtform~cottngov No public entity may enter into additional debt if it has failedto file the Report on Debt Obligation. A fillable PUF of form CT-0253 can be found at

i~flp~www.con1ptroller.tngov/slJpub~e~tasp

Sincerely,

~. l)~4~rtdCai~i~Mary-Margaret CollierDirectorof the Office of State & Local Finance

Cc: Mr. Jim Arnette, Director of focal Government Audit COTMr. Bill Anderson, Sullivan CountyMr. Tom McAnufty, Stephens Inc.Mr. Ashley McAnulty,Stephens Inc.

Enclosures (2): Report of the Director of the Office of State & Local FinanceState Form CT-O253, Report on Debt Obligation

J

REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF STATE AND LOCAL FINANCECONCERNING THE PROPOSED ISSUANCE OF

GENERAL OBLIGATiON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2013SULLIVAN COUNTY, TENNESSEE

Sullivan County (the “County”) submitted a plan of refunding (the “Plan”) as required by Tennessee Code Annotated Section 9-21-903 regarding an issuance of an amount not to exceed $8,165,000 General Obligation County District School RefundingBonds, Series 2013 (Taxable) (the “2013 Refunding Bonds”), to advance refund by competitive sale an estimated $7,230,000General Obligation County School District Refunding Bonds, Series 2004 (the “Ref~undedBonds”).

COUNTY’S PROPOSED REFUNDING OBJECTIVE

The County indicated in its Plan that its purpose for the refunding is for debt service savings.

REFUNDING ANALYSIS

• The results for the refunding are based on the assumption that an estimated $8,165,000 series 2013 Refunding Bondswill be sold by competitive sale priced at a par.

• Pursuant to federal tax regulations, the 2013 Refunding Bonds will be sold at taxable interest rates because thisrefunding will be the second advance refundingof the bonds.

• The estimated net present value savings of the refunding is $356,294 or 4.93% of the Refunded Bonds.• The average coupon is reduced from 5,19% on the Refunded Bonds to 1.02% for the 2013 Refunding Bonds.• The 2013 Refunding Bonds do not extend thematurity schedule of the Refunded Bonds.• Estimated cost of issuance of the 2013 Refunding Bonds is $90,097 or$11.03 per $1,000 bond. See Table 1 for individual

costs of issuance.Table 1

Cost of Issuance of GO County District School RefundingBonds, Series 2013

Price per

Amount $1,000 bondUnderwriter’s Discount $ 40,825.00 $ 5.00 *

Financial Advisor 20,621.00 2.53Bond Counsel 11,000.00 1.35Other costs 17,651.00

$ 90,097.00 $ 11.03

The County has Identified Stephens Inc. as its municipal advisor. Municipal advisors have a fiduciary responsibility to you, theissuer. Underwriters have no fiduciary responsibility to yOu. They represent the Interests of their firm.

This report of the Office of State and Local Finance does not constitute approval or disapproval by the Office for the Plan oradetermination that a refunding is advantageous or necessary nor that any of the refunded obligations should be called forredemption on the first or any subsequent available redemption date or remain outstanding until their respective dates ofmaturity. This report is based on information as presented In the Plan by the County. The assumptions included in theCounty’s Plan may not reflect either current market conditions ormarket conditions at the time of sale.

This report does not provide broad approval to refund the Refunded Bonds in a bond issue other than the proposed 2013Refunding Bonds. If all of the Refunded Bonds are not refunded as a part of the 2013 Refunding Bonds, then a new plan mustbe submitted to this Office for review-

edl;t~iMary-M garet CollifrDirector of the Office of State and Local FinanceDate: May 20, 2013

Total Cost of IssuanceSubjectto competitive bid

• I.E

I-) ~ ~ j

Sullivan County

Bond & Note Refunding Projected Savings

ProjectedSavings

$14,770,000 Sullivan County School Refunding Bonds $ 1,400,494.63

$8,165,000 Sullivan County District School Refunding Baonds $ 371,55648

Sullivban County Projected Savings Total $ 1,772,051,11:

$1,140,000 Networks Industrial (Business) Park Refunding Capital Outlay Notes $ 87,35053

Networks Projected Savings Total I 87,350.53

Projected Savings Grand Total $ 1,859,401.64

Sullivan County,Tennessee

Board ofCounty Commissioners

Item 14

ExecutiveNo. 20 13-05-47

Attachment

To the HonorableSteveM. Godsey,Mayor of Sullivan County, and the Board of SullivanCountyCommissionersmeetingin RegularSessionthis20th day of May, 2013.

RESOLUTIONTo FurtherExpandTheCurrentDayWorkerProgram

WHEREAS,thecost of governmentoperationscontinuesto increasewith limited resourcestocovercosts;and

WHEREAS, the inmate population in Sullivan County taxpayers’ correctional facilities hasincreased,alongwith funding for food, medical care, etc.; and

WHEREAS, the“Day WorkerProgram”was established years ago and from its origin was toutilize trusteelabor from thejail for the purpose of cleaning and mowing county facilities withno additionalcostto thecountytaxpayers;and

WHEREAS, the Sullivan County Sheriff’s Departmentand Jail, currently responsible.foroverseeingthis program along with a committee madeup of Sponsorand Co-sponsorofResolution No. 2010-09-90 approved 15 November 2010, has many more pressingresponsibilitiesinvolving protectingandservingthecitizensof Sullivan County;and

WHEREAS, the Director of Maintenanceand his Department are currently overseeingtheCommunity ServiceProgram and has had extensive involvement with overseeingthe DayWorkerProgramfor overtenyears.

NOW THEREFOREBE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners ofSullivan County, Tennessee assembled in regularsessionherebyauthorizesthe DirectorofMaintenance and hisDepartmentto overseethe “Day Worker Program”.

BE IT RESOLVEDthat Sullivan County Board of Commissioners hereby authorizes thisDepartment of Maintenance to receive all funding in the budget and equipment necessaryto perform its duties related to Program 807, line item “Cleaning and Mowing TrusteeLabor” in fund 54210-100 through 54210-500.

WaiverOfRulesRequested

WI. uh

‘[his resolutionshall take effect from and after its passage. A]l resolutions in conflict herewithbe andthesamerescindedinsofaras suchconflict exists.

Approved: ~ -~SteveNI. Godsey County ayor

[Aäirustrative Budget

I AcTIONf

Executive Count;CommissionApproved7 Ayn, I

05—20—131Na~2EassI,

1 Absent

Approvedthis 20th dayof_________ 2013.

Sponsored By: Dwight KingPrime Co-Sponsor(s): Dennis Houser, Ty Boomershine, Cathy Armstrong,Mark flowery,

Eddie Williams, Bob White, Bob Neal, Matthew Johnson,James“Moe” Brotherton, Linda Brittenham, 13111 Kilgorc, Baxter hood

Notes:

dJ’uJ 4#~~J’~~j~ ~ V/Sullivan County,Tennessee

Boardof CountyCommissionersItem 2

Administrative/Budget

No. 2010-09-90

To theHonorableSteveM. Godsey,Mayor of Sullivan County,and the Board of Sullivan County Commissionersmeetingin RegularSessionthis 20th dayofSeptember2010.

Expand The Dayworker Program in Sullivan County

RESOLUTIONTo E3tablu1t4be-~SuHiteJ1-Count) Inmatca TeepayerSwi’inga Program’

WHEREAS,~hecostof governmentoperationscontinuesto increasewith limited resourcesto coverthe additional

cost; and

WHEREAS, on any given day there’ are more than 600 inmates housed in the Sullivan County taxpayers’correctionalfacilities at a cost of approximately$8,000,000annuallyinoludinghousing,security,and medicalcare,etc.; and

WHEREAS,thereis alwaysan expandingneedfor personnelto accomplishdifferenttasks for the SullivanCountygovernmentand its manybranchesof operation;and

WHEREAS, what is now known as the“Day Worker Program”wasestablishedseveralyearsagowhich from itsorigin wasa use of trustee labor from the jail for the purposeof cleaningand mowingof county facilities throughthe countymaintenancedepartmentwith no additionalcost to thecountytaxpayers.

NOW THEREFOREBE IT RESOLVEDthat the Board of County Commissionersof Snllinn County,Tennessee,assembledin Regular Session hereby establishCommitteeto coordinatewith theSheriff’s Office in establishing a work program which expands the “DayWorker Program”to extend servicesto the various governmentdepartmentsand other governmentalagenciesin thecounty; the Committee to be made up of the Sponsorand Co—Sponsor;

That the program shalt be funded at no additional operating coststo thecounty; that a portionofthesavingswill be utilized to provide any financial support for the operation ofthe program;

That a monthly report be presented to the Commission on~the activities and accomplishmentsof the- prOgram.

This resolution shalltake effect from and after its passage. All resolutions in conflict herewith be and the samerescindedinsofarassuchconfliètexists.

Approvedthis 15th dayof November 2010.

APProved~,~M~

Sponso By: Dwight KingPrimeCo-Sponsor(s):CathyArmstrong

2010-09-90 Administrative Budget Executive County CommissionDeferred 10-4-10; Deferred 10-7-10, Deferred 10-5-IC, ApiiEoved 11—15—10Approved 11-1-10 Approved I 1-9-10 Approved I 1-3-TO 23 Aye. 1 Absent

Notes: 1stReading09-20-10;Deferred10-18-10;bitended1,; Sponsor11—15—10 as shown above.[n the Absence of the Prime Co—Sponsor, Bi11~1Kilgore seconded.~

MOTION ON FLOOR

MOTION AS FOLLOWS:

MOTION THA’I’ THE COMMISSION AUTHORIZE THE PURCHASINGAGENT 10LOOK AND SEEIF WE CAN FIND A MEDIA SYSTEM TO GO N THECOURTROOM

MOTION MADE BY: CRAWFORDSECONDEDBY: KILGORE

ACTION: APPROVEDVOICE VOTE

‘JJ~Ju~L.

AND THEREUPON COUNTY COMMISSION ADJOURNED UPON

MOTIONMADEBY COMM.WHITE TOMEETAGAIN IN REGULAR

SESSION JUNE17, 2013.

SEVG SEY

COMMISSION CHAIRMAN