COPY FOR REVIEW AND - Civic Ed

12

Transcript of COPY FOR REVIEW AND - Civic Ed

Page 1: COPY FOR REVIEW AND - Civic Ed
Page 2: COPY FOR REVIEW AND - Civic Ed

COPY FOR REVIEW ANDTRAINING PURPOSES ONLYREPRODUCTION PROHIBITEDWITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION

These lessons were excerpted fromWe the People: The Citizen & the Constitution, Level 3.

©2009 Center for Civic Education

All rights reserved. Except for use in a review,reproduction or transmittal of this work in any formor by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, nowknown or hereafter invented, including photocopying andrecording, and use of this work in any form in any informationstorage and retrieval system is forbidden without prior writtenpermission of the publisher. Although the contents of this book weredeveloped under a grant from the U.S. Department of Education, thecontents do not necessarily represent the policy of the Departmentof Education, and endorsement by the federal government shouldnot be assumed. The federal government reserves a nonexclusivelicense to use and reproduce for government purposes,without payment, this material, excluding copyrightedimages, where the government deemsit in its interest to do so.

Directed by the Center for Civic Educationand funded by the U.S. Department of Educationunder the Education for Democracy Act approvedby the United States Congress.

Page 3: COPY FOR REVIEW AND - Civic Ed

WHAT IS THE

ROLE OF THE PRESIDENT

IN THE AMERICAN

CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM?

23LESSON PURPOSE

The president of the United States is among the most powerful political figures in the world. In the interna-tional realm the president speaks for the country and is the symbol of America. At home the president suggeststhe policy agenda for Congress and is the leader of his or her political party. Americans look to the president forleadership, while at the same time fearing the concentration of political power in the executive branch. This les-son examines sources of presidential power and ways that checks and balances limit presidential power.

Wh en you have finished this lesson , you should be able to explain the pre s i den t’s con s ti tuti onal re s pon s i bi l i ti e sand how the of f i ce of pre s i dent has evo lved . You also should be able to iden tify va rious con s ti tuti onal and po l i ti c alchecks on the president’s power. You should be able to explain fundamental differences between the office ofprime minister in a parliamentary system and the American presidency. Finally, you should be able to evaluate,take, and defend positions on issues involving the exercise of presidential power and the relationship between thepresident and the other branches of government.

TERMS AND CONCEPTS TO UNDERSTAND

commander in chief

executive order

executive power

1 6 1

Page 4: COPY FOR REVIEW AND - Civic Ed

WHAT ARE THE PRESIDENT’S

CONSTITUTIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES?

Arti cle II of the Con s ti tuti on places “the e xec utivePower,” the powers of the exec utive bra n ch of govern-m en t , in the pre s i dent of the Un i ted State s . Un l i ke Arti cl eI , wh i ch gives Con gress those powers “h erein gra n ted ,”Arti cle II does not define exec utive power. Th eCon s ti tuti on lists some of the pre s i den t’s powers , butthose listed have never been thought to be the pre s i den t’son ly powers . The listed powers inclu de the fo ll owi n g :

V Commanding the army and navyas commander in chief

V Heading the executive department(cabinet and executive departments)

V Granting reprieves, or postponementof punishment, and pardons

V Making treaties, subject to the adviceand consent of the Senate

V Nominating ambassadors, public

ministers, consuls, and judges of theSupreme Court and other federal courts

V Recommending legislation to Congress

V Reviewing legislation passed by Congress andreturning bills to which the president objects

V Receiving ambassadors and other publicministers (chief diplomat)

The Constitution further directs the president to“take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” It alsorequires the president to take an oath that includes apromise to “faithfully execute the Office of Presidentand…preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution ofthe United States.”

Presidents have asserted many reasons to justify abroad definition of executive powers, particularly intimes of n a ti onal em er gen c y, su ch as the Gre a tDepression, and war. The Constitution has proven flexi-ble enough to adapt to changing understandings ofpresidential power.

Should the president have the power to veto bills passed by majorities of both houses of Congress? Why?

1 6 2

Page 5: COPY FOR REVIEW AND - Civic Ed

WHAT DO YOU THINK?

1 Arti cle II, Secti on 1, gives the pre s i den t“exec utive Power ” but does not def i n ewhat that power is. What other provisionsof Arti cle II give an indicati on of what theFra m ers meant by exec utive power ?

2 What ad d i ti onal insights into the natu re ofexec utive power are provi ded in Arti cle I?

HOW DID THE FRAMERS

ENVISION THE PRESIDENCY?

The Framers envisioned the president as an officialabove partisan politics, that is, a person not devoted to aparticular political party. Publius explained in Federalist68 that they wanted the president to be a person whohad earned the esteem and confidence of the entirenation, with a character “preeminent for ability andvirtue.” They designed the Electoral College to identifypeople of such character. There was no expectation thatcandidates would campaign for the office. The Framersthought that the president should remain above partisanpolitics. But their expectations were unmet even duringPresident Washington’s administration, when factionsarose that led to the development of political parties.

The Fra m ers did not want the pre s i dent to have thepowers of a mon a rch . But they did want the pre s i dent tobe “en er geti c ,” a qu a l i ty they con tra s ted with legi s l a tive“del i bera ti on .” “ E n er gy ” refers to the capac i ty of one per-s on to act ef f i c i en t ly and vi goro u s ly on beh a l f of t h en a ti on . The Fra m ers fe a red what they call ed a “feebl eexec utive .” As Al ex a n der Ha m i l ton argued in Federa l i s t7 0 , “A feeble exec uti on is but another ph rase for a badexec uti on ; and a govern m ent ill exec uted , wh a tever it maybe in theory, must be , in practi ce , a bad govern m en t .”

HOW HAS THE PRESIDENCY EVOLVED?

Occupants of the office of president have varied instature and achievements. Some have been undeniablygreat, others have been mediocre, and still others areregarded as failures. The prece dents for the mod ernpresidency are the powerful figures who took a broadview of their authority under the Constitution.

Early examples of powerful presidents are our firstand third presidents, George Washington and ThomasJefferson. However, some scholars trace the rise of thepowerful modern pre s i dency to An d rew Jack s on .Before Jackson presidents used the veto power sparinglyto aid Con gress in the perform a n ce of its del i bera tivef u n cti on s . Th ey retu rn ed bi lls to Con gress for “recon-s i dera ti on ,” or furt h er ref l ecti on . Jack s on used the

power differently. He vetoed the recharter of the SecondBank of the United States. In the resulting battle betweenthe president and Congress, Jackson appealed directly tothe public to support his position on the bank. Duringhis two terms in of f i ce Pre s i dent Jack s on used the vetot welve ti m e s , m ore than all his predece s s ors com bi n ed .He used it not on ly against bi lls that he con s i deredu n con s ti tuti onal but also against those he vi ewed asb ad po l i c y.

Abraham Lincoln contributed significantly to thegrowth of the office, even though he rarely used the vetopower. Confronted with the Civil War (discussed in UnitThree), Lincoln asserted unprecedented, unilateral exec-utive power. He justified actions such as imposing ablockade on southern ports, suspending the writ ofhabeas corpus, nationalizing the militia, and expandingthe size of the army and the navy as exercises of wh a the call ed an “ i n h erent exec utive power ” in times ofem er gen c y. Con gress ulti m a tely aut h ori zed most ofL i n co l n’s acti on s .

Th eodore Roo s evelt and Wood row Wi l s on alsohelped transform the presidency into the powerful insti-tution it is today. Roosevelt used the office as a “bullypulpit” to shape public opinion and frame debates ondomestic legislation that he proposed to Congress. Abully pulpit is a position of visibility and influence,often a political office, from which to advocate a partic-ular point of view. The word bully, in this case, means“ very good ” or “excell en t .” Wi l s on similarly carri edissues directly to the public, notably in his unsuccessfulfight for America’s entry into the League of Nations afterWorld War I.

The most influential president in the twentieth cen-tury was Franklin D. Roosevelt. Roosevelt was electedduring the Great Depression and served until nearly theend of World War II. He used both crises to consolidatepresidential power. At home Roosevelt took direct con-trol of the policy process, submitting a wide range ofreforms to Co ngress as part of his New Deal. Theseincluded Social Security, employment programs, andextensive reforms of executive agencies. As commanderin chief during World War II Roosevelt helped to estab-lish America’s preeminence in the international arena.He also was the first president to make extensive use ofpublic opinion polls, which informed him about howAmericans were responding to his proposals. He talkeddirectly to the pe ople through radio “fireside chats,”using a conversational, personal style to establish trustand confidence.

Pre s i dents since Roo s evelt have served in his shadow.Some have agreed with Roo s evel t’s dom e s tic po l i c i e s .Ot h ers have sought to dismantle them . However, a ll ef fec-tive pre s i dents have rel i ed on stra tegies that Roo s evel tu s ed to bo l s ter pre s i den tial power. Ronald Re a ga n , for

1 6 3

Page 6: COPY FOR REVIEW AND - Civic Ed

ex a m p l e , e s t a bl i s h ed himsel f as the Great Com mu n i c a tor,wh ereas John F. Ken n edy and Bi ll Cl i n ton used thei rpers onal ch a risma to win po l i tical allies and to persu adethe Am erican people to su pport their po l i c i e s .

CRITICAL THINKING EXERCISE

Examining Presidential Qualifications

The Constitution lists three formal requirements forthe office of president: natural born citizen, resident ofthe United States for fourteen years, and at least thirty-five years of age. Work in small groups to make a list ofthe informal qualifications that you think a presidentshould possess. For example, should a president be welleducated? Have previous government or military expe-rience? Be charismatic, articulate, and personable? Why?Compare your list with the lists prepared by othergroups. Are there informal qualifications that appear oneveryone’s list? How does your list compare with thequalifications the Founders believed were important?

WHAT IS THE PRESIDENT’S

ROLE IN FOREIGN POLICY?

Article II grants four powers that, taken together,establish the president as the nation’s leader in foreignpolicy. Congress also has enormous powers over foreignpolicy because it establishes and collects taxes, declareswar, pledges the credit of the United States, and regulatesforei gn com m erce . Con gress also funds the arm edforce s , m a kes rules governing them—the Un i formCode of Military Justice—and makes rules related to“Captures on Land and Water,” as contained in Article I,Secti on 8, of the Con s ti tuti on . However, Con gre s s’s role islargely one of reacting to the president. The president’spowers in foreign relations include the following:

V Commanding the armed forces The nati on’s military power can be used bo t hto pro tect the nati on from hostile powers andas a threat to help persuade other countriesto comply with America’s policies. Congresshas declared war only five times. However,every pre s i dent after Roo s evelt has usedthe com m a n der in ch i ef ’s power to sen dAm erican troops to co u n tries abroad —i n cluding Kore a , Vi etn a m , Leb a n on , Gren ad a ,Kuw a i t , Som a l i a , Ko s ovo, Afgh a n i s t a n , a n dIraq—without declarations of war.

V Making treaties Treaties are agreementswith other nations and international organi-zations. They can address matters rangingfrom economics to defense. The president hassole authority to negotiate and make treatieson behalf of the United States. However, thetreaties must be approved by a two-thirdsvote of the Senate. In 1949, for example,President Harry Truman made the UnitedStates one of the founding members of theNorth At l a n tic Tre a ty Orga n i z a ti on , a militaryalliance. The Senate approved. But othertre a ti e s , n o t a bly the Tre a ty of Vers a i lles afterWorld War I, have not been ratified.

V Appointing ambassadors and consulsThe pre s i dent dec i des who repre s ents theUn i ted States within other co u n tri e s . Th epre s iden t’s appoi n tee s , who must be approvedby a m a j ori ty vo te in the Sen a te , h elp to shapethe image of the Un i ted States overseas and toadvise on forei gn po l i c y, i n cluding mon et a rya s s i s t a n ce to other co u n tri e s , or forei gn aid.

V Receiving ambassadorsand other public ministersPresident Thomas Jefferson helped to estab-lish the principle that this provi s i on of theWhat responsibility, if any, should government take regarding unem-

ployment?

1 6 4

Page 7: COPY FOR REVIEW AND - Civic Ed

Constitution means that the president is “theonly channel of communication bet ween theUn i ted States and forei gn nati on s .” The ri gh tto receive ambassadors and other publ i cm i n i s ters from abroad inclu des the ri ght notto recogn i ze them . Withholding recogn i ti oncan be used as a policy too l . For example,in 1913 President Woodrow Wilson’s refusalto recognize the provisional governmentof Mexico contributed to the downfallof that government.

HOW DO THE PRESIDENT’S POWERS

EXPAND IN WAR AND EMERGENCY?

During wars and emergencies presidents commonlyexercise powers not gra n ted by the Con s ti tuti on .Pre s i dent Grover Cl eveland dep l oyed federal troop swithout congressional authorization in 1894 to putdown a stri ke among Pu llman train car workers .President Franklin Roosevelt transferred destroyers toGreat Britain in 1940, a year before the United Statesentered World War II. And President Truman orderedthe secretary of commerce to operate the nation’s steelmills during a strike to ensure an adeq uate supply ofsteel during the Korean War.

On occasion Congress and the Supreme Court havetried to rein in the president. In 1952 the Supreme Courth eld that Pre s i dent Truman had exceeded his aut h ori ty ins eizing the steel mill s . In the 1970s, Con gress also deb a tedwithdrawing funding for the Vietnam War as the warcontinued to lose public support. In 2006 the Court heldthat President George W. Bush’s creation of special mil-itary commissions to try alleged terrorists violated theUniform Code of Military Justice passed by Congress in1950 and the 1949 Geneva Convention, an internationaltreaty that the United States had signed. These examplesa s i de , du ring wars and nati onal em er gencies bo t hCongress and the Court tend to defer to the president.

HOW AND WHY HAS PRESIDENTIAL

POWER EXPANDED HISTORICALLY?

It sometimes is argued that the two-plus centuries ofAmerican experience have been characterized by a gen-eral drift of authority and responsibility toward theexecutive branch. In fact, the preponderance of powerhas flowed o ver time from o ne branch to another.During most of the nineteenth century Congress pre-dominated. In the twentieth century as the role of theUnited States in world affairs grew, so did the formal andinformal powers of the president. The administrations

1 6 5

What are some of the checks on the president’s powers in foreign relations?

Page 8: COPY FOR REVIEW AND - Civic Ed

of Franklin Roosevelt, Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon,and George W. Bush were marked by increased asser-tions of presidential authority.

Th ere are several re a s ons for the increase in the powersof the pre s i den c y. One re a s on is that Am ericans havea lw ays ex pected their ch i ef exec utives to act vi goro u s lyand to ad d ress the nati on’s probl em s . Al ex a n derHa m i l ton in Federalist 70 cl a i m ed , “ E n er gy in the exec u-tive is a leading ch a racter in the def i n i ti on of good gov-ern m en t .” Th omas Jef fers on con ten ded that circ u m-s t a n ces “s om etimes occ u r ” wh en the pre s i dent mu s ta s sume aut h ori ties beyond the law wh en nece s s i ty or sel f -pre s erva ti on requ i re . In tere s ti n gly, h owever, p u blic op i n-i on po lls taken since the 1930s ref l ect two unch a n gi n gpopular atti tu des tow a rd the pre s i den c y. The first is thatpeople want stron g, activist pre s i den t s . The second is thatpeople fear and distrust activist pre s i den t s . Am eri c a n swant and ex pect the other two bra n ches of govern m ent toact as ch ecks and balances on the exec utive .

A second reason for the enlargement of executiveauthority is that the constitutional powers of the presi-dent are stated in broad terms. It is possible to interpretthem in ways that have permitted an expansion of pres-idential influence.

A third re a s on for the growth of exec utive power isthe pre s i den t’s role in recom m ending legi s l a ti on toCon gress (Arti cle II, Secti on 3). The exec utive bra n chproposes most of the bi lls that Con gress con s i ders .E n forcing dec i s i ons of the Su preme Co u rt and carry-ing out and en forcing laws en acted by Con gress alsoh ave led to a more cen tral role for the exec utive .Moreover, the exec utive has played an incre a s i n glyactive role in the devel opm ent of federal reg u l a ti on s .Federal reg u l a ti ons are rules cre a ted by exec utive agen-cies to el a bora te the of ten gen eral laws passed byCon gress to make them opera ti on a l . Th ey are pri n tedin the Fed eral Regi s ter, a daily govern m ent publ i c a ti onof n o ti ce s , ru l e s , and other inform a ti on , and are opento public com m ent for 30 days before they areapproved and become law. As such, they are an exampleof the shared power of l awm a k i n g.

A fo u rth re a s on for the growth of exec utive aut h ori tyis the use of executive orders. An executive order is arule or regulation issued by the president. The use ofexecutive orders by presidents has greatly increased inrecent years as a result of the tendency of legislative bod-ies to leave the details of laws they pass to be filled in bythe executive branch. All executive orders issued by thefederal government must be published in the FederalRegister. Some states have similar publications.

F i n a lly, pre s i den tial and exec utive power hasi n c re a s ed as the federal govern m ent has assu m ed re s pon -sibilities that formerly were seen as the responsibilities

of i n d ivi duals or of l ocal and state govern m en t s .Examples of re s pon s i bi l i ties shifted to the nati on a lgovernment range from education to health care, trans-portation, and product safety.

HOW ARE PRESIDENTIAL POWERS LIMITED?

Despite the president’s immense powers, the systemof checks and balances limits presidents in a number ofw ays . For ex a m p l e , the Twen ty - s econd Am en d m en tlimits the president to two elected terms in office. Thisamendment was adopted after Franklin Roosevelt aban-doned the tradition begun by Geo rge Washington ofstepping down after two terms. Even though Roosevelthad been immensely popular, Americans feared a presi-dent who remained in power too long.

Congress can check the exercise of the president’spower by

V Rejecting the president’s legislative agendaor mod i f ying it in ways that make it unac-ceptable to the president Examples includethe rejection of Franklin Roosevelt’s proposalto increase the nu m ber of ju s ti ces on theSu preme Co u rt and his plans to reor ga n i zethe executive branch.

1 6 6

What opportunities does the Federal Register provide for citizens tomonitor and influence government?

Page 9: COPY FOR REVIEW AND - Civic Ed

V Asserting its constitutional authorityAn example is the 1973 War Powers Resolu-tion intended to reinforce the constitutionalpower of Con gress to decl a re war. Am on go t h er things it requ i res the pre s i dent toconsult with Congress before initiating anyforeign hostilities and regularly thereafteruntil American armed forces no longerare engaged in hostilities.

V Refusing to ratify treatiesFor ex a m p l e , in 1996 Bi ll Cl i n ton sign eda com preh en s ive nu clear test ban tre a tywith 137 other nati on s . Ten ye a rs laterthe Sen a te had nei t h er ra ti f i ed nor hel dm a j or heari n gs on it.

V Refusing to con f i rm pre s i den ti a ln om i n ees to the ju d i c i a ry or topa d m i n i s tra tive po s tsExamples are the Senate’s refusal to confirmRichard Nixon’s nominations of G. HarroldCa rs well and Cl em ent Hay n s worth to theSu preme Co u rt and Geor ge H. W. Bu s h’snomination of John Tower to be secretaryof the Department of Defense.

V Refusing to fund the president’s programsBy cutting off or reducing funds, or bythreatening to do so, Congress can abolisha gen c i e s , c u rtail progra m s , or obtain requ e s tedinformation. An example is the refusal ofCongress to provi de funding for em er gen c yaid for Vietnam as requested by PresidentLyndon B. Johnson.

V Removing the president from office byimpeaching, trying, and convicting him

The Supreme Court also can check the exercise ofpresidential power. Examples include the following:

V Humphrey’s Executor v. United States ( 1 9 3 5 )Congress must approve the president’s deci-sion to remove an official of an independentregulatory agency.

V United States v. Nixon (1974)The president is not entitled to automaticimmunity from the legal process (reaffirmedin Clinton v. Jones, 1997).

V Train v. City of New York (1975)The president cannot refuse to spend moneythat Con gress has appropri a ted unless Con gre ssgives the president discretion to do so.

The exec utive bra n ch itsel f also can limit the pre s-i den t , as wi ll be discussed in the next lesson . Exec utivea gencies and bu reaus devel op their own ch a n ge -resistant trad i ti ons and styles of performing thei rj ob s . Ca reer civil servi ce em p l oyee s — m a ny of t h emex perts in their fiel d s — m ay resist the pre s i den t’spo l i tical pri ori ties wi t h o ut fear of losing their job s .

F i n a lly, p u blic op i n i on limits the exercise of pre s i-den tial power. A pre s i dent who lacks public su pport ish a n dc u f fed in his ef forts to carry out his policy agen-das at home and abroad . Pre s i dent Truman on cel a m en ted , “I sit here all day trying to persu ade peop l eto do the things they ought to have sense en o u gh todo wi t h o ut my persu ading them … . Th a t’s all thepowers of the pre s i dent amount to.”

What are some of the principal means by wh i ch the powers of t h epresident can be limited?

1 6 7

Page 10: COPY FOR REVIEW AND - Civic Ed

CRITICAL THINKING EXERCISE

Examining the Role of the Executive Branch

in Promoting the Protection of Individual Rights

The actions of the executive branch in de velopingfederal regulations and executive orders are subject tothe same democratic political processes made possibleby our Constitution. Private citizens and interest groupsand movements have used these processes to influenceexecutive branch decisions.

Work in groups of three to five students. Each groupshould select one of the regulations or executive orderslisted below and determine what rights it was designedto protect and how the political process was used toinfluence the actions of the government. Each groupshould answer the questions following the list and pre-pare a short presentation for the class.

V Emancipation Proclamation (1863)Freedom of s l aves in terri tory of the Con fed -era te States of Am erica that did not retu rnto Union control by January 1, 1863

V Executive Order 8802 (1941)Nondiscrimination in employment

V Executive Order 9981 (1948)Integration of the military

V Executive Order 10730 (1957)In tegra ti on of s ch ools in Little Rock , Ark a n s a s

V Executive Order 11246 (1965)Enforcement of affirmative action

V Philadelphia Plan (1969)Affirmative action in federal employment

V Code of Federal Regulations,Title 34 (C.F.R. 34) (2000)Implementation of parts of the Civil RightsAct of 1964 regarding nondiscriminationin education, as follows:

V Part 100Prohibits discrimination on thebasis of race , co l or, or nati onal ori gi n

V Part 104Pro h i bits discri m i n a ti onon the basis of d i s a bi l i ty

V Part 106Prohibits discriminationon the basis of sex

V Part 110Prohibits discriminationon the basis of age

V Code of Federal Regulations,Title 28, Part 35 (1991)Pro h i bits discri m i n a ti on onthe basis of d i s a bi l i ty

1 6 8

Which branch of government was responsible for the integration of the military?

Page 11: COPY FOR REVIEW AND - Civic Ed

1 What were the historical circumstancesthat led to the executive action?

2 What are the major provisions ofthe executive order or federal regulation?

3 What rights does the order or regulationpromote or protect?

4 How does the order or regulation reflecta major shift in American public policy?

5 How has the order or regulation changedthe course of private and public action?

6 How was the democratic political processused to influence the executive branch toissue this order or regulation?

V Was this order or reg u l a ti on a re su l tof con gre s s i onal acti on? If s o, wh a twas the cause of the acti on ?

V Was this order or reg u l a ti on the re su l tof the influ en ce of c ivil soc i ety intere s tgroups? If s o, what were they and howdid they help get the order or reg u l a ti onenacted?

V What other factors contributed to theenactment of this order or regulation?

HOW DOES THE AMERICAN PRESIDENT

DIFFER FROM A PRIME MINISTER?

In a parliamentary system the majority party or coali-tion in Parliament appoints the prime ministe r, thehighest-ranking member of the executive branch of aparliamentary government. Cabinet ministers usuallyare the leading parliamentary figures in the majorityparty. In Britain the prime minister must have served inParliament so that he or she comes to the office of primem i n i s ter with ex ten s ive govern m ent ex peri en ce .Legislative and executive powers are integrated in parlia-mentary systems. That integration is believed to makegovernment more efficient and better able to reflect thepopular will. A prime minister who submits a list ofm e a su res to Pa rl i a m ent can be con f i dent thatParliament will enact the pro posals. However, if theprime minister loses the confidence of Parliament, he orshe can be removed immediately.

In the United States the legislative, executive, andjudicial branches are not integrated. The country as awhole chooses the president. Congress usually has nosay in who is elected, and the Constitution does notrequire a president to have any prior experience innational government. Neither must the majority ineither the House or the Senate be of the same politicalp a rty as the pre s i den t . The Con s ti tuti on does notrequire Congress to adopt legislation that the presidentproposes, approve treaties that the president negotiates,confirm the president’s judicial or other nominees, or

1 6 9

What are some of the differences between the roles of prime minister and president?

Page 12: COPY FOR REVIEW AND - Civic Ed

fund wars. The president’s actions also are subject toreview by the judiciary and may be declared unconstitu-tional. Unlike a prime minister, the president serves afixed four-year term and does not lose office merelybecause of low public opinion or failure to persuadeCongress to enact proposed legislation.

If the pre s i dent of the Un i ted States has become thepreem i n ent figure in dom e s tic and intern a ti onal po l i ti c s ,it is because pre s i dents have used their con s ti tuti onal andd i s c reti on a ry powers to adva n t a ge . Pre s i den tial powerdepends on the abi l i ty to persu ade , to navi ga te thro u ghthe com p l ex i ties of s ep a ra ti on of powers , to ga rn er tru s t ,and to shape public op i n i on . Hi s tory also shows that thepre s i den t’s roles in forei gn affairs and as com m a n der inch i ef a re great sources of power. However, as Ly n donJo h n s on discovered du ring the Vi etnam Wa r, i f p u bl i cop i n i on tu rns against the pre s i den t’s forei gn po l i c i e s , t h a tpre s i den t’s power is in jeop a rdy. F i n a lly, s i n ce the Un i tedS t a tes has become a world power, the pre s i den t’s standingin the eyes of the public and, in the words of t h eDecl a ra ti on of In depen den ce , in the “Op i n i ons ofMa n k i n d ,” m ay en h a n ce or detract from the intern a ti on a lrep ut a ti on of the nati on .

WHAT DO YOU THINK?

1 Would you support a constitutionalamendment to change the president’stenure in office from a fixed term toa vote-of-confidence system as inGreat Britain? Why or why not?

2 What are the advantages and disadvan-tages of having the president chosen bythe people rather than the legislature?

3� Should the pre s i dent be requ i redto appear before Con gress from ti m eto time to answer direct qu e s ti on s ,as prime ministers are requ i red todo in parl i a m en t a ry sys tem s ?Why or why not?

REVIEWING AND USING THE LESSON

1 What factors explain the growthof presidential power during ournation’s history?

2 Has Congress relinquished toomuch power to the president?Explain your view.

3� How is the system of checks andbalances designed to limit the exerciseof presidential power?

4 How well does the system of checksand balances work? Why?

5 How can public opinion affectpresidential power?

6 How would you define a “feeble”exec utive? In what ways might a feebl eexec utive be as dangerous as anoverly “energetic” executive?

7 What are the differences betweena president and a prime minister?

Why might presidents be less vulnerable to public opinion than primeministers?

1 7 0