City of Hubbard Transportation System Plan Update

April 25, 2012

Project Overview & Financially Constrained Project List

Summary of DeficienciesSummary of Deficiencies1999 TSP does not address UGB expansion areas

Many streets don’t meet existing design standards

Railroad crossing issues

High crash rates on OR 99E

Three intersections do not meet ODOT standards in the 2035 “No-Build” Scenario

Meets performance target Does not meet target

Recommended Alternative ImprovementsRecommended Alternative Improvements

Includes all pedestrian and bike projects identified in TM#3 (not cost constrained)

Refined cost estimates (including right-of-way)

Summary of OR 99E AlternativesSummary of OR 99E Alternatives

1. Extend the 3-lane cross section– D Street and G Street intersections don’t meet standards – Queues exceed available storage at D Street, G Street, and J

Street

2. Extend the 3-lane cross section & add signal at G Street– Signal warrants and spacing standards not met

3. Construct a 5-lane cross section throughout Hubbard– All intersections meet standards and no queuing issues– Inadequate right-of-way and funding

4. Extend the 3-lane section. Construct 5-lanes between D & G– All intersections meet standards and no queuing issues

5. Extend 3-lane section. Construct southbound right-turn/through lane between A & J Street.– All intersections meet standards and no queuing issues

Financially Constrained Alternative - RoadsFinancially Constrained Alternative - Roads

Interim improvements needed to meet ODOT mobility standard

Financially Constrained Alternative - BikesFinancially Constrained Alternative - Bikes

Survey results– Mixed support for bicycle facilities– Bike lanes on OR 99E are a priority

Removed all bike projects except Highway 99E bike lanes to free funds for sidewalk improvements

Financially Constrained Alternative - SidewalksFinancially Constrained Alternative - Sidewalks

OR 99E, D Street, 3rd Street sidewalks

7th Street, G Street, J Street, and 5th Street sidewalks

Mill Creek Trail

OR 99E crossing improvements at A Street– State Traffic Engineer approval needed once part of funded project

Railroad crossing improvements– Engineering study to assess grade issues– Construct sidewalks on both sides of road (5 feet from signal arms)– Potential additional costs based on study results and coordination

with ODOT Rail and Union Pacific

Financially Constrained Alternative - SidewalksFinancially Constrained Alternative - Sidewalks

Policy and Code Amendments

Future Street PlanFuture Street Plan

New collectors– G Street– 10th Street– A Street– Dunn Road– Painter Loop– 1999 TSP “Loop

Road”– New UGB Streets

Local street grid in UGB expansion areas

Proposed Street Design StandardsProposed Street Design Standards

(Reflects Downtown Revitalization Plan Recommendations)

Proposed Street Design StandardsProposed Street Design Standards

(Reflects Downtown Revitalization Plan Recommendations)

(Same as Existing Standard)

Proposed Street Design StandardsProposed Street Design Standards

Example Crossover Easement ProcessExample Crossover Easement Process

Transportation Financing ProgramTransportation Financing Program

Financially Constrained AlternativeFinancially Constrained Alternative

Forecast Funding Amount (primarily non-discretionary formula, grant, and SDC funding)

Proposed TSDC Policy ChangesProposed TSDC Policy Changes

Add Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities to the TSDC

Use Person Trip and Vehicle Trip Factors

Maintain Similar Method of Allocating TSDCs among Res. And Non-Res. Land Use Types (as in Prior Methodology)

Keep Current Exemption Policies & Escalation Policies Unchanged