Ch i l ti th dChemical separation methods appli d l t ...€¦ · LTDE-SD händelserSD, händelser...
Transcript of Ch i l ti th dChemical separation methods appli d l t ...€¦ · LTDE-SD händelserSD, händelser...
Ch i l ti th dChemical separation methods apimplications on detection
LTDE Sorption Dif(LTDE
Johan Byegård / Magnus GeosigmaGeosigma
li d l t lpplied on complex water samples, limits for -spectrometry
ffusion ExperimentE-SD)
Kronberg / Kersti NilssonAB / SKBAB / SKB
LTDE at ÄSPÖ HRLNASA3067 (z -410 m)
KA3065A03
LTDE-SD, experimentelltexperimentelltkonceptp
LTDE-SD händelserLTDE SD, händelser Uttag av 16 st 24 mm dia provkätestsektionentestsektionen
d = 10 mmn = max 8 st per snitt
20072007ärnor i matrisberget runt
Tracers injected in maTracers injected in maexperiment
T G T GTracer Group Tracer G
Na-22 B1 Nb-95 B S-35
A Tc-99 B
Cl-36 A Pd-102 BCl-36
A Pd-102 B
Co-57 B2 Cd-109 B Ni-63
B2 Ag-110m B
Se-75 ? Sn-113 B Sr-85
B1 Ba-133
B
Zr-95
B2
A non-sorbing tracer, B1 cation exchange, B2 mainly surf
ain sorption diffusion ain sorption diffusion
G T GGroup Tracer Group
B2 Cs-137 B1
B3 Gd-153 B2
B2 Hf-175 B2B2 Hf-175 B2
B2 Ra-226 B1
B2 Pa-233 B2
B2 U-236 B3
B1 Np-237 B3
face complexation, B3 electrochemical reduction dependent
Gammasectru
eV4 ke
V
56 k
eV3
keV
103
keV
37, 6
62 k
e
Sr-8
5, 5
14
Ba-
133,
3H
f-175
, 343
Gd-
153,
Cs-
1H
E t d t d >99%Expected to decrease >99%Expected to decrease 10-90%
um injected tracers
275
keV
Na-
22, 1
E t d t d <10%%
Expected to decrease <10%
Proposed separation meProposed separation me
• Addition of DTPA lower cAddition of DTPA, lower cconcentration of Ca, will fosome of the tracers
• Passing the solution throu(Dowex Wx8)( )
• Expected outcome:Tri and tetra valent catio– Tri- and tetra-valent catioto DTPA than to the sulfoexchanfer
– Mono- and divalent will foand will be adsorbed to th
ethod:ethod:
concentration than the naturalconcentration than the naturalorm negative complex with
ugh a cation exchanger
ons will be stronger complexedons will be stronger complexedonic acids of the cation
orm weak complex to the DTPA he cation exchanger
Result of the Cation Exchang
Log K (DTPA)
Result of the Cation Exchang
Na-22 ? <3
Sr-85 9.77
Cs-137 ? <3
Ba-133 8.87
Co-57 19.27
Cd-109 19.2
Ag-110m 8.61g
Gd-153 22.56
Hf 175 35 4Hf-175 35.4
ge/DTPA separation process
% in cation % in eluate
ge/DTPA separation process
exchanger
99.9 0.08
99.98 0.02
99.98 0.02
99.93 0.07
4 96
16 84
19 81
8 92
<7 >93<7 >93
Gamma spectrum
10000000
514
keV
eV
100000
1000000
Sr-8
5, 5
Ba-
133,
356
ke
10000
100000
s
1000
coun
ts
keV
100
Gd-
153,
103
, 343
keV
1
10
Hf-1
75,
1-200 0 200 400 60
Energy
m after separation
eV662
keV
Eluate from cation exchangerCation Exchanger
Na-
22, 1
274
ke
Cs-
137,
6
00 800 1000 1200 1400
y (kev)
Sorption of Gd-153 duriSorption of Gd 153 duri1.00E-03
1.00E-04
(g-1
)
1 00E 05
C/A
tot
1.00E-05
1.00E-060 50 10
Elapsed
ing the exeperimenting the exeperiment
Na-22Gd-153Gd-153, separation process
00 150 200
d time (h)
Sorption of Hf-175 duriSorption of Hf 175 duri1.00E-03
1.00E-04
(g-1
)
1 00E-05
C/A
tot
1.00E-05
1.00E-060 50 1000 50 100
Elapsed t
ng the experimentng the experiment
Na-22Hf-175Hf-175, separation process
0 150 2000 150 200
time (h) Lets look closer on this
-spectrum Hf-1 spectrum Hf 1
10000
1000cond
s
1000
3200
0 se
100
unts
per
3co
u
10336 338 340 342
-en en
175 343 4 keV175, 343.4 keV
Non-processed sample(sum)Sorbed in cation echangerSorbed in cation echanger
Eluate from cationexchangerg
2 344 346 348 350
nergy (keV)nergy (keV)
-spectrum Hf spectrum Hf
180
200
140
160
180
econ
ds
Eluate from cationexchanger
100
120
3200
0 se
60
80
unts
per
3
20
40cou
0336 338 340 342
-en en
f-175, 343.4 keVf 175, 343.4 keV
2 344 346 348 350
nergy (keV)nergy (keV)
-spectrum Hf- spectrum Hf
10000co
nds
3200
0 se
Detection limit reported: 2.5 Bq-> 1440 net pulses
unts
per
-> 1440 net pulses
cou
1000336 338 340 342
-e
-175, 343.4 keV175, 343.4 keV
q
Measured non-processedsmaple + reported detectionlimit contsM d dMesured non-prcessedsample
2 344 346 348 350
energy (keV)gy ( )
-spectrum Hf spectrum Hf
8000
9000
6000
7000
8000
econ
ds
4000
5000
6000
3200
0 se
2000
3000
4000
unts
per
Detection limit reported: 2.5 Bq -> 1440 net pulses
1000
2000co
0336 338 340 342
-e
f-175, 343.4 keVf 175, 343.4 keV
Measured non-processedsmaple + reported detectionlimit contsM d d
q
Mesured non-prcessedsample
2 344 346 348 350
energy (keV)gy ( )
Summary and Conclusi
• A chemical separation meto detect and measure trato detect and measure trameasurable
• Detection limits?
ons
ethod has made it possoble acers atherwise notacers atherwise not