Bringing advanced science inquiry tools in for a soft landing: report of a five year study Mike...
-
date post
21-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Bringing advanced science inquiry tools in for a soft landing: report of a five year study Mike...
Bringing advanced science inquiry tools in for a soft landing: report of a five year study
Mike Charles & Bob Kolvoord
(Pacific University) & (James Madison University)
Research supported by the National Science Foundation
Northwest Council for Computers in EducationSeattle, Washington March 2005
The promise
Scientific visualization tools provide... Rich use of the computers available in schoolsConnections to science/math for visual learnersA vehicle for inquiry-based science Use tools which were originally designed to help
scientists understand and explore data
Goal: To draw today’s increasingly visual learners into in-depth study of science/math topics
The opportunity
How to get more teachers involved in using visualization tools in their classrooms? A promising tool that requires advanced skills
Extended training in the tools is often too much, too soon...
Project VISM
Three week summer institutes sponsored by the Interdisciplinary Science and Technology program at James Madison UniversityCross-training in different visualization techniques, including image processing, GIS, molecular modeling and simulationMiddle and High School science and mathematics teachers with some higher education participants Teacher educators who work with prospective science and
mathematics teachers
Summers of 2000, 2001, and 2002--118 participants total
Tools taught in Project VISM
Image processingNIH Image/Scion Image/Image JGeospatial AnalysisArcView GISMolecular VisualizationRasMol/Chemscape ChimeSystems modellingSTELLA
NIH Image/Scion Image/ImageJ
Public domain image processing software
Software and free classroom activities available at http://www.evisual.org/
Animal hands: identifying x-rays of animal hands by describing the hand and identifying its function
ArcView GIS
Available for educators--See the ESRI homepage
http://www.esri.com/
Classroom activity available at http://www.evisual.org/
Plate Tectonics visualized: mark earthquake and volcanic sites on a world map using spreadsheet data. Observe patterns and identify plate boundaries.
RASMOL/Chemscape Chime
Public domain software for mol viz
Presented as “molecular storytelling”
Resource page: http://www.isat.jmu.edu/users/klevicca/vism/vism.htm
"Come See the Molecules—Using 3-D Modeling Programs to Learn Chemistry" in ISTE's Learning & Leading with Technology
http://www.iste.org/L&L/archive/vol29/no4/index.html(Note: Must be a subscriber to the periodical in order to access Acrobat
files of the articles)
STELLA
Commercial systems simulation softwareStrong educator user baseMore info at http://www.hps-inc.com/
Pictured here: simulation model for a cup of coffee cooling using stocks and flows
The ACOT model of stages of teacher development in using technological tools
Entry level-competent using the tool at the workshop Learned the Animal Hands activity at a workshop
Adopt the tool into their teaching practice Successfully used the Animal Hands activity with my students
Adapt the tool into their teaching practice Made significant modifications to the Animal Hands activity to
make it work better with my students
Innovate with the tool in their teaching practice Brought in new images from a local zoo of animal hands to add to
the activity
The VISM matrix: The ACOT model described for each of the four tools
Created based on conversations with the instructors over the duration of the projectPosed as a hypothetical path that teachers might followWe did NOT expect teachers to reach the innovate level with all four tools, but instead to make professional choices among their visualization options VISM Matrix
Critical attributes of advanced tools
Competency with the software tool (ACOT model)Competency with the scientific data that the tool usesCompetency with the pedagogical content knowledge needed to teach curricular content using the tool Pedagogical content knowledge identifies the distinctive bodies of
knowledge for teaching. It represents the blending of content and pedagogy into an understanding of how particular topics, problems or issues are organized, represented, and adapted to the diverse interests and abilities of learners, and presented for instruction. Pedagogical content knowledge is the category most likely to distinguish the understanding of the content specialist from that of the pedagogue. (Shulman, 1987)
Follow-on interviews
10 interviews conducted thus far35 questionnaires from Summer 2003 and 2004 “reunion” workshop participantsStarter questions for open-ended interviewsBriefly describe 1 or 2 projects you carried out last year with your
students using one or more of these visualization tools.What were your greatest obstacles in using these tools with your
students during the year? Briefly describe what you think you accomplished this year based
on your participation in the VISM workshop, and one thing you had hoped to accomplish but perhaps did not.
Summary of implementation of the tools
Adopt-used an activity
Adopt-used several
acts.
Adapt Innovate %
Image processing
7 17 14 15 38%
Geospatial Analysis
9 5 8 16 27%
Systems modeling
7 5 4 10 19%
Molecular Visualization
11 3 3 6 16%
Totals 34 30 29 47
% 24% 21% 21% 34%
Changes in your ability with these tools
Less competent More competent
1 2 3 4 5 total
ArcView 3 5 7 6 23 44
Image J 4 1 12 13 14 44
STELLA 9 7 12 8 7 43
RASMOL/Chemscape Chime
8 7 15 7 5 42
total 24 20 46 34 49
% 14% 12% 27% 20% 28%
Obstacles
Greatest obstacle for your use of these tools? (1--not an obstacle…5--serious obstacle)
Average
Lack of space in a crowded curriculum to do projects that use these tools
3.4
Lack of adequate teacher preparation time to prepare activities 3.0
Lack of teacher knowledge of these software tools 3.0
Lack of well-designed curriculum-based materials using these tools 2.8
Relating the use of these tools to increasing student achievement scores 2.6
Lack of adequate hardware/software 2.6
Student difficulty learning the tools 2.3
Incompatibility of these tools with district’s stated educational objectives
2.3
Obstacles
Time--to develop classroom ready activities
Space in the curriculum
Higher demands of NCLB and high stakes testing
Changes in teaching assignment and personal life
Hardware/software access--…negotiating adequate computer time for students to do their work is
nonetheless a major challenge for these teachers.
Exemplary uses of all four tools by experienced scientific visualization tool users
Teacher One & Teacher Nine
Image processing Innovate
Physics Image project—photographing and dropping a ball and determining acceleration rate of gravity. Adapted from discussions with a VISM participant.
-90 minutes period to do
-90 minute period to analyze
Geospatial Analysis Innovate
Would “watering holes” in the desert reduce mortality rates for illegal aliens?
Plotted paths on an image of the southwest
-2 week activity
Built an online eAtlas database of economic indicators for 6 border crossings between AZ and Sonora
-8 week project
Molecular Visualization Adapt
RASMOL model of a number of different inorganic solid structures which they observed the shape of and predicted the polarity
-90 minute lab activity
Systems modeling Adapt
Teacher created STELLA model of immigration rates with or without “watering holes”
-90 minute lab activity
Comments Already at the innovate level with NIH Image and ArcView prior to VISM
More typical implementations
Teacher two Teacher three Teacher four
Image processing
Adopt
Completed Travel USA activity with 9th grade computer apps course as part of a population sampling activity
1 period activity
Adopt
Demonstrated one NIH Image activity to students.
No student activities or projects
1 period activity
Adapt
Maintained her use of this tool. Demos several activities-- students may investigate “hands on” outside of class.
Offered summer institutes for 20 teachers in NIH Image.
Geospatial Analysis
Innovate
11th/12th grade elective GIS course with 22 students in each of 2 semesters.
Students complete GIS projects-ESRI text
Multi-week mapping projects
Adopt
Demonstrated one GIS activity re the distribution of volcanoes.
No student activities or projects
1 period activity
Innovate
Taught a GIS applications course to a broad range of professionals in the region
Applying for an NSF grant to design a GIS program on campus
Scholarship to GIS in Ed. conference
Molecular Visualization
Not yet Adopt
Demonstrated 3D capabilities of software
No student activities or projects
1 period activity
Not yet
RASMOL Saturday workshop and materials given to a colleague in chemistry
Systems modeling
Not yet Not yet Not yet
Considering using as part of a BLM prairie dog town research project
Comments Pursuing further instruction in ArcView Intends to do student projects in advanced courses next year.
Greatest need: more GIS training
VISM tools not yet “landed” in teaching practice
Teacher five Teacher six Teacher seven Teacher eight
Image processing Not yet Not yet Not yet Conducted workshops with teachers--minimal results in classrooms
Geospatial Analysis
Not yet Not yet Not yet Conducted summer workshops using Mapping Our World
Molecular Visualization
Not yet Not yet Adopt
Authored a webpage tutorial re polar and nonpolar molecules Used once with students with limited effectiveness
Not yet
Systems modeling
Not yet •Not yet •Greatest interest for use with calculus class
Not yet Not yet
Comments Adopted probeware/astronomy software based on VISM tech expertise
New math/science center -- upcoming sabbatical to develop curriculum specific activities
Hardware access obstacles
Workshop marked him as a possible tech leader in his school.
Hardware access obstacles
Restimulated interest in a new set of software visualization tools and motivated her to try more training in these areass
Crowded curriculum & NCLB
Discussion
Current professional development literature argues for site-based, curriculum-specific professional development efforts with significant on-site follow-up Sustainable? Scalable? Need to look outside the constraints of the site and
curriculum Intrinsically motivated educators constructing their own
program of professional development--the fundamentally constructivist nature of teacher learning.
Project VISM was a university-based program with materials that had only general curriculum connections and with no significant on-site follow-up component.
Fundamentally constructivist nature of teacher learning
Staff training
Extrinsic motivation
Program determined by organizational mission and goals
Mandated by the organization
Professional Development
Intrinsic motivation
Constructing their own program
Personally constructed
For more info
Mike Charles at Pacific University [email protected]
Bob Kolvoord, Project Director, at JMU [email protected]
Project VISM home page
http://www.isat.jmu.edu/common/projects/VISM/