Biomechanical Characteristics of Tendons of Limbs of the Buffalo

download Biomechanical Characteristics of Tendons of Limbs of the Buffalo

of 14

Transcript of Biomechanical Characteristics of Tendons of Limbs of the Buffalo

  • 7/30/2019 Biomechanical Characteristics of Tendons of Limbs of the Buffalo

    1/14

    In vitro study on biomechanical characteristics of tendons of limbs of the buffalo*

    S.C.dubal, 1 K.N.Vyas 2 and Y.L.Vyas 3

    Department of Anatomy

    College of Veterinary Sc. & A.H., Gujarat Agricultural University,

    Anand 388 001 (Guj) India

    Key words: Biomechanical characteristics, tendons, limbs, buffalo.

    ABSTRACT

    The biomechanical characteristics of tendons of distal part of the fore and hind

    limbs of six young (6 to 10 months old) and adult (5 to 10 years old) male Surti buffaloes

    were utilized to understand quantitatively the susceptibility of the tendons for strain

    injuries. There were significant (P < 0.01) age related differences amongst the tendons

    studied. The mean value of Young` s modulus of elasticity, factor of safety and fracture

    toughness did not differ (P >0.01) amongst the tendons studied, and hence these

    properties appeared to be material properties. All other mechanical properties appeared

    to be specimen properties. Those tendons which act as prime movers and are subjected

    to high physical stresses, had higher values of tensile strength but lower values of critical

    length of micro-damage and the number of fatigue cycles than their opponents. It was

    therefore concluded that former tendons were more susceptible to tendon injuries than

    the later ones.

    INTRODUCTION

    The aetiology of tendon injuries in domestic animals is, in general, rather complicated.

    It is an emerging concept in musculo-skeletal pathology that cyclic over loading creates

    cumulative micro-damage which ultimately results in tissue failure. Most of the

    biomechanical studies have been carried out on equine tendons. The suggested factors

    responsible for micro-damage of equine tendons are cross-sectional area and collagen content

    (Riemersma and Schamhardt, 1985), composition of extra-cellular matrix (Jones and Boe,

    1990), longitudinal heterogenecity (Smith et al.,1994), inter fibre differences (Beckeret al,.

    1994) and elevation of core temperature ( Wilson and Goodship,1994 ). There are a few

    reports pertaining to the biomechanical studies of the bovine tendons (Pandya, 1982, Vyas

    and Vyas, 1985). However, these studies did not concern with the tendon injuries in general

    and micro-damage and cyclic over loading in particular. The present work was an attempt to

    _______________________________________

    Part of Ph.D. thesis submitted by first author.

    1Assistant professor, 2 Retd. Principal and 3Associate professor.

  • 7/30/2019 Biomechanical Characteristics of Tendons of Limbs of the Buffalo

    2/14

    compare the biomechanical properties of tendons of distal part of both the limbs of the buffalo

    so that the study may be useful in understanding the tendon injuries. Emphasis was especially

    so that the study may be useful in understanding the tendon injuries. Emphasis was especially

    given to the transverse length of micro-damage and number of cycles, which can cause the

    tendon failure.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Fresh muscles with their tendons were obtained from cadaver fore and hind limbs of

    apparently healthy six male young (6 to 10 months old) and adult ( 5 to 10 years old ) Surti

    buffaloes. The mean body weight of young and adult animals were 64.54 6.74 kg and

    518.84 14.55 kg respectively. The tendons were immediately kept in ice cooled normal

    saline solution. The widest part of muscle belly was cut transversely then its impression was

    recorded on a graph paper and subsequently its cross-sectional area (CSA in cm2) was

    measured. The maximum force generated by the muscle was termed as working load (WL in

    kg).The working load was calculated by multiplying the CSA of the muscle belly with 6 i.e.,

    WL = 6 CSA ( Ikai and Fukunaga, 1968).

    From the thinnest part of the tendon, two perpendicular diameters were taken. The

    CSA was almost elliptical in shape. The tendons were then immediately subjected to study the

    tensile loading at testing machine. For each tendon, a stress-strain curve was obtained to

    measure the young` s modulus of elasticity (E). The ultimate tensile load (UL) at which the

    tendon ruptured was also recorded. During the experiment the tendons were kept cool and

    moist by applying the cold normal saline solution.

    Tensile strength (TS) of a tendon was obtained by dividing the UL with its original

    CSA. Factor of safety (FS) was obtained by dividing the UL with the WL. The critical length

    (CL) of destructive process (the transverse length of micro-damage) was calculated as

    follows:

    2

  • 7/30/2019 Biomechanical Characteristics of Tendons of Limbs of the Buffalo

    3/14

    CL = 2 G E / (TS)2, (1)

    G = Surface free energy of the tendon per unit area

    The exact value of G is not known. The most probable value of G was assumed to be 0.50

    10 3 J / m2 ( Pascoe 1978 and Epifanov 1979 ).

    The fracture toughness (FT) was calculated as follows:

    FT = (TS) ( CL)

    = (2 G E)

    (2)

    The fatigue tensile strength (FTS) of a tendon was obtained by its minimum WL (assumed to

    be equal to 4 CSA of its belly.

    The number of cycles (N) of repeated loading that could produced the failure, was

    calculated as follows (Pascoe 1978 ):

    (d CL/dN) = C ( FTS ) n ( CL ) n/2 (3)

    C = Constant.

    Since CL

  • 7/30/2019 Biomechanical Characteristics of Tendons of Limbs of the Buffalo

    4/14

    cycles of fatigue failure, fracture toughness and fatigue tensile strength showed significantly

    (P< 0.01) higher mean values in the adult animals than the young one.

    Biomechanical properties in relation to limbs and tendons:

    1. Working load and Ultimate load:

    In both the age groups, the mean values of WL and UL of the tendons of hindlimb

    were significantly (P< 0.05) higher than those of the forelimb. Further, the WL and UL of

    tendons of cranio-lateral (tarsal flexors and digital extensors) group showed significantly (P