Assessment of Energy Needs David L. Gee, PhD Professor of Food Science and Nutrition Central...

18
Assessment of Energy Needs David L. Gee, PhD Professor of Food Science and Nutrition Central Washington University
  • date post

    20-Dec-2015
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    216
  • download

    0

Transcript of Assessment of Energy Needs David L. Gee, PhD Professor of Food Science and Nutrition Central...

Page 1: Assessment of Energy Needs David L. Gee, PhD Professor of Food Science and Nutrition Central Washington University.

Assessment of Energy Needs

David L. Gee, PhDProfessor of Food Science and NutritionCentral Washington University

Page 2: Assessment of Energy Needs David L. Gee, PhD Professor of Food Science and Nutrition Central Washington University.

Reasons to assess energy needs• Energy needs are highly variable• Prevent underfeeding

– decrease organ mass and function– impaired wound healing– impaired immune response

• Prevent overfeeding– excessive CO2 production

• Respiratory acidosis

– Hyperglycemia and insulin resistance– fluid retention and fat gain (fatty liver)

Page 3: Assessment of Energy Needs David L. Gee, PhD Professor of Food Science and Nutrition Central Washington University.

Estimation of Resting Energy Expenditure (REE) with Prediction

Equations• Harris-Benedict Equation (1919)

– based on gender, weight, height, age

• WHO Equations (1982)– based on gender, weight, age

• Errors in estimation:– Standard deviation = 10%

– 95% confidence interval = 20%

Page 4: Assessment of Energy Needs David L. Gee, PhD Professor of Food Science and Nutrition Central Washington University.

Validation of Several Established Equations for Resting Metabolic Rate in

Obese and Nonobese People.Frankenfield et al., JADA 103:1152(2003)

• 130 healthy adults (BMI=18.8-96.8)– 98% white

• Compared equations to indirect calorimetry– Harris-Benedict– Adjusted Harris-Benedict (25% of excess wt)– Owen (1986)– Mifflin (1990)

• Men: kcal/d=5+10(wt)-6.25(ht)-5(age)• Women: kcal/d=-161+10(wt)+6.25(ht)-5(age)• Wt=kg, ht=cm,age=yrs

Page 5: Assessment of Energy Needs David L. Gee, PhD Professor of Food Science and Nutrition Central Washington University.
Page 6: Assessment of Energy Needs David L. Gee, PhD Professor of Food Science and Nutrition Central Washington University.
Page 7: Assessment of Energy Needs David L. Gee, PhD Professor of Food Science and Nutrition Central Washington University.

Accurate Determination of Energy Needs in Hospitalized

Patients.Boullata et al., JADA 107:-393-401 (2007)

• 395 hospitalized patients• Compared prediction equations against

measured REE– Harris-Benedict, Mifflin, 6 others

• Conclusions:– Most accurate was Harris-Benedict multiplied by

1.1, but only 62% were within 10% of measured REE

– “No equation accurately predicted REE in most hospitalized patients … only indirect calorimetry will provide accurate assessment of energy needs.”

Page 8: Assessment of Energy Needs David L. Gee, PhD Professor of Food Science and Nutrition Central Washington University.

Why prediction equations fail…• Equations based on gender, height,

weight and age explain ~ 80% of individual variation in REE

• Sources of other variations– Mass of various tissues

• Visceral tissues 10x more active than muscle tissue at rest and 100x more active than adipose

• Knowing body composition based on 2-component or 4-component models still inadequate

Page 9: Assessment of Energy Needs David L. Gee, PhD Professor of Food Science and Nutrition Central Washington University.

Estimation of Total Energy Expenditure is even less

accurate• TEE = REE + Activity + TEF + Injury factors

• estimations of – activity

– TEF

– injury factors

• are crude estimates

Page 10: Assessment of Energy Needs David L. Gee, PhD Professor of Food Science and Nutrition Central Washington University.

Indirect Calorimetry

• Estimation of energy expenditure based on respiratory gases– oxygen consumed

– carbon dioxide produced

• Nutrient + O2 -> CO2 + H2O + energy

• Metabolic Carts

• Hand-held Indirect Calorimeters

Page 11: Assessment of Energy Needs David L. Gee, PhD Professor of Food Science and Nutrition Central Washington University.

Oxidation of glucose• Glucose + 6O2 -> 6CO2 + 6H2O + 673Cal/mol

• 673/6 = 112 Cal/mol O2

• Respiratory Quotient (RQ) = Respiratory Exchange Ratio (RER) = CO2/O2

• RQCHO = 6/6 = 1.0

Page 12: Assessment of Energy Needs David L. Gee, PhD Professor of Food Science and Nutrition Central Washington University.

Oxidation of Fat• Palmitate + 23O2 -> 16CO2 + 16H2O + 2398Cal/mol

• 2398/23 = 104 Cal/mol O2

• RQ = 16/23 = 0.7

Page 13: Assessment of Energy Needs David L. Gee, PhD Professor of Food Science and Nutrition Central Washington University.

Oxidation of Amino Acids• RQ for amino acids and the energy produced per

mol of O2 varies for each amino acid

• RQ for average protein is 0.85• Contribution of protein oxidation is ignored

because:– small compared to fat and glucose

– RQ at rest is typically close to 0.85

– protein oxidation during short-term exercise is very small compared to fat and glucose

– To measure protein oxidation, one needs to collect 24hr urine to measure total urea production

Page 14: Assessment of Energy Needs David L. Gee, PhD Professor of Food Science and Nutrition Central Washington University.

RQ (RER) Tables

• RQ or RER can be used to:

– Determine the calories burned per •liter of oxygen consumed or•Liter of carbon dioxide produced

– Determine the % of calories produced by burning fats and carbohydrates

Page 15: Assessment of Energy Needs David L. Gee, PhD Professor of Food Science and Nutrition Central Washington University.

Indirect Calorimetry Calculations

Method I (rough estimate)

• Approximately 5.0 Cal/l O2

• l O2/min x 5.0 Cal/lO2 = Cal/min• example:

– VO2 = volume of O2 consumed/min = 0.2 l/min

– then 0.2 x 5 = 1 Cal/min – if REE, then 1 Cal/min x 1440 min/d = 1440Cal/d

Page 16: Assessment of Energy Needs David L. Gee, PhD Professor of Food Science and Nutrition Central Washington University.

Indirect Calorimetry Calculations

Method 2 (not so rough estimate)

• More accurately: 4.8 Cal/l O2

• Example– if: VO2 = 0.2 l/min

– then: 0.2 x 4.8 = 0.96 Cal/min

– if REE, then 0.96 x 1440 = 1382 Cal/d

Page 17: Assessment of Energy Needs David L. Gee, PhD Professor of Food Science and Nutrition Central Washington University.

Indirect Calorimetry CalculationsMethod 3 - using total RQ• if VO2 = 0.2 l/min and VCO2 = 0.17

l/min• then RQ = 0.17 / 0.2 = 0.85

• if RQ = 0.85, then 4.862 Cal/lO2

• 0.2 x 4.862 = 0.97 Cal/min• 0.97 x 1440 = 1400 Cal/day

Page 18: Assessment of Energy Needs David L. Gee, PhD Professor of Food Science and Nutrition Central Washington University.

Determination of VO2 and VCO2

• Go to the Word document on Indirect Calormetry Calculations