ANTITRUST Music : Gustav Mahler, Symphony No. 1 (1888) Performed by Bavarian Radio Symphony...

43
ANTITRUST Music: Gustav Mahler, Symphony No. 1 (1888) Performed by Bavarian Radio Symphony Orchestra, Conductor: Rafael Kubelik (1968)

Transcript of ANTITRUST Music : Gustav Mahler, Symphony No. 1 (1888) Performed by Bavarian Radio Symphony...

ANTITRUST

Music:

• Gustav Mahler, Symphony No. 1 (1888)

• Performed by Bavarian Radio Symphony Orchestra, Conductor: Rafael Kubelik (1968)

FACTORS AFFECTING DEMAND

• PERSONAL TASTE

• INCOME

• PRICE OF COMPLEMENTARY GOODS

• PRICE OF SUBSTITUTES

DEMANDDemand

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Q

P P

DEMANDDemand

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Q

P P

DEMANDDemand

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Q

P P

TYPES OF PRODUCER COSTS

• FIXED v.VARIABLE COSTS

• TOTAL v. AVERAGE COSTS

• MARGINAL COST

FIXED v. VARIABLE COSTS

• FIXED COSTS: DO NOT VARY IN SHORT RUN

• VARIABLE COSTS

FIXED v. VARIABLE COSTS

• FIXED COSTS: DO NOT VARY IN SHORT RUN

• VARIABLE COSTS: VARY WITH LEVEL OF PRODUCTION

TOTAL v. AVERAGE COST

• TOTAL COST: ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PRODUCT LINE

• AVERAGE COST

TOTAL v. AVERAGE COST

• TOTAL COST: ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PRODUCT LINE

• AVERAGE COST: MEAN COST PER ITEM PRODUCED

TOTAL v. AVERAGE COST

• TOTAL COST: ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PRODUCT LINE

• AVERAGE COST: MEAN COST PER ITEM PRODUCED– AVERAGE TOTAL COST

– AVERAGE VARIABLE COST

MARGINAL COST =

ADDITIONAL COST OF PRODUCING

ONE MORE UNIT

ALL COSTS INCLUDE “NORMAL” PROFIT

SUPPLY CURVE =MARGINAL COST CURVE

FOR INDUSTRY AS A WHOLE

SUPPLY & DEMANDDemand

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Q

P P

FACTORS AFFECTING FACTORS AFFECTING SUPPLY CURVESUPPLY CURVE

• TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE

FACTORS AFFECTING FACTORS AFFECTING SUPPLY CURVESUPPLY CURVE

• TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE

• INPUT PRICES

SUPPLY & DEMANDDemand

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Q

P P

PRODUCERS’ GOAL

MARGINAL REVENUE =

MARGINAL COST

PRODUCERS’ GOAL

IN COMPETITIVE MARKET

MARGINAL REVENUE =

PRICE =

MARGINAL COST

SUPPLY & DEMANDDemand

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Q

P P

OPTIMUM CONDITIONS FOR COMPETITIVE EQUILIBRIUM• FUNGIBLE PRODUCT

• SUPPLIERS CAN’T AFFECT EACH OTHERS PRICING/OUTPUT

• MOBILITY/EQUALITY OF RESOURCE AVAILABILITY

• GOOD INFORMATION/LOW TRANSACTION COSTS

OPTIMUM CONDITIONS FOR COMPETITIVE EQUILIBRIUM• FUNGIBLE PRODUCT

• SUPPLIERS CAN’T AFFECT EACH OTHERS PRICING/OUTPUT

• MOBILITY/EQUALITY OF RESOURCE AVAILABILITY

• GOOD INFORMATION/LOW TRANSACTION COSTS

OPTIMUM CONDITIONS FOR COMPETITIVE EQUILIBRIUM• FUNGIBLE PRODUCT

• SUPPLIERS CAN’T AFFECT EACH OTHERS PRICING/OUTPUT

• MOBILITY/EQUALITY OF RESOURCE AVAILABILITY

• GOOD INFORMATION/LOW TRANSACTION COSTS

OPTIMUM CONDITIONS FOR COMPETITIVE EQUILIBRIUM• FUNGIBLE PRODUCT

• SUPPLIERS CAN’T AFFECT EACH OTHERS PRICING/OUTPUT

• MOBILITY/EQUALITY OF RESOURCE AVAILABILITY

• GOOD INFORMATION/LOW TRANSACTION COSTS

OPTIMUM CONDITIONS FOR COMPETITIVE EQUILIBRIUM• FUNGIBLE PRODUCT

• SUPPLIERS CAN’T AFFECT EACH OTHERS PRICING/OUTPUT

• MOBILITY/EQUALITY OF RESOURCE AVAILABILITY

• GOOD INFORMATION/LOW TRANSACTION COSTS

SUPPLY AND DEMANDDemand

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Q

P P

SUPPLY & DEMANDDemand

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Q

P P

SUPPLY & DEMANDDemand

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Q

P P

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

P

MC

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

P

MC

ELASTICITY(SENSITIVITY TO PRICE CHANGES)

% CHANGE IN OUTPUT NECESSITATED BY 1% CHANGE IN

PRICE

ELASTICITY > 1DEMAND IS ELASTIC

•CONSUMERS RESPONSIVE TO PRICE CHANGES

•GOOD SUBSTITUTES EXIST

ELASTICITY < 1DEMAND IS INELASTIC

•CONSUMERS UNRESPONSIVE TO PRICE CHANGES

•FEW GOOD SUBSTITUTES

TOTAL REVENUE/DEMAND

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Q

P/$ P

TR

Q P TR MRI MC TC Pft 4 21 84 15 7 28 565 19 95 11 7 35 606 17 102 7 7 42 607 15 105 3 7 49 568 13 104 -1 7 56 489 11 99 -5 7 63 3610 9 90 -9 7 70 2011 7 77 -13 7 77 012 5 60 -17 7 84 -24

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

P

MRI

MC

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

P

MRI

MC

Q P TR MRI MC TC Pft 4 21 84 15 7 28 565 19 95 11 7 35 606 17 102 7 7 42 607 15 105 3 7 49 568 13 104 -1 7 56 489 11 99 -5 7 63 3610 9 90 -9 7 70 2011 7 77 -13 7 77 012 5 60 -17 7 84 -24

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

P

MRI

MC

MONOPOLY: PROBLEMS

• HIGH PRICES

• LOWER OUTPUT

• WEALTH TRANSFER (?)

• DEADWEIGHT LOSS

BARRIERS TO ENTRY

• LIMITED ACCESS TO KEY RESOURCES

• GOVERNMENT REGULATION

• HIGH FIXED COSTS

• BRAND LOYALTY

MONOPOLY: PROBLEMS

• HIGH PRICES

• LOWER OUTPUT

• WEALTH TRANSFER (?)

• DEADWEIGHT LOSS

• PREDATORY CONDUCT

• RENT-SEEKING BEHAVIOR