Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End …people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~ctnguyen/Research/...C....
Transcript of Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End …people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~ctnguyen/Research/...C....
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End
Architectures
Clark T.-C. Nguyen
Dept. of Electrical Engineering & Computer ScienceUniversity of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105-2122
TAPAS’06August 5, 2006
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Outline
• Introduction: Miniaturization of Transceiversneed for high-Qvibrating RF MEMS wish list
• Micromechanical Resonatorsclamped-clamped beamsmicromechanical disksreconfigurable multi-functionalitymicromechanical circuits
• MEMS-Enabled Communication Front-EndsRF channel-selectionall-MEMS front-end
• Conclusions
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Wireless Phone
Rec
eive
dPo
wer
FrequencyωRF
DesiredSignal
Motivation: Miniaturization of RF Front Ends
90o0o
A/D
A/D
RF PLL
Diplexer
From TX
RF BPF
Mixer I
Mixer Q
LPF
LPF
RXRF LO
XstalOsc
I
Q
AGC
AGC
LNA
Antenna
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Wireless Phone
Rec
eive
dPo
wer
FrequencyωRF
Motivation: Miniaturization of RF Front Ends
90o0o
A/D
A/D
RF PLL
Diplexer
From TX
RF BPF
Mixer I
Mixer Q
LPF
LPF
RXRF LO
XstalOsc
I
Q
AGC
AGC
LNA
Antenna
Need high Q to minimize loss
lower noise figure
Need high Q to minimize loss
lower noise figureHighly selective
frequency filteringHighly selective
frequency filtering
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Wireless Phone
FrequencyωRF
Motivation: Miniaturization of RF Front Ends
90o0o
A/D
A/D
RF PLL
Diplexer
From TX
RF BPF
Mixer I
Mixer Q
LPF
LPF
RXRF LO
XstalOsc
I
Q
AGC
AGC
LNA
Antenna
Need high Q to minimize loss
lower noise figure
Need high Q to minimize loss
lower noise figureHighly selective
frequency filteringHighly selective
frequency filtering
DesiredSignal
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Wireless Phone
FrequencyωRF
Motivation: Miniaturization of RF Front Ends
90o0o
A/D
A/D
RF PLL
Diplexer
From TX
RF BPF
Mixer I
Mixer Q
LPF
LPF
RXRF LO
XstalOsc
I
Q
AGC
AGC
LNA
Antenna
DesiredSignal
Need high Qor low loss
components to do this
Need high Qor low loss
components to do this
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Why High-Q?
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
• In resonator-based filters: high tank Q ⇔ low insertion loss
• At right: a 0.3% bandwidth filter @ 70 MHz (simulated)
heavy insertion loss for resonator Q < 5,000
Selective Low-Loss Filters: Need Q
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
• Main Function: provide a stable output frequency• Difficulty: superposed noise degrades frequency stability
ωωο
ivoi
A
Frequency-SelectiveTank
SustainingAmplifier
ov
Ideal Sinusoid: ( ) ⎟⎠⎞⎜
⎝⎛= tofVotov π2sin
Real Sinusoid: ( ) ( ) ( )⎟⎠⎞⎜
⎝⎛⎟
⎠⎞⎜
⎝⎛ ++= ttoftVotov θπε 2sin
ωωο
ωωο=2π/TO
TO
Zero-Crossing Point
Tighter SpectrumTighter Spectrum
Oscillator: Need for High Q
Higher QHigher Q
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
• Problem: IC’s cannot achieve Q’s in the thousandstransistors consume too much power to get Qon-chip spiral inductors Q’s no higher than ~10off-chip inductors Q’s in the range of 100’s
• Observation: vibrating mechanical resonances Q > 1,000• Example: quartz crystal resonators (e.g., in wristwatches)
extremely high Q’s ~ 10,000 or higher (Q ~ 106 possible)mechanically vibrates at a distinct frequency in a thickness-shear mode
Attaining High-Q
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Wireless Phone
So Many Passive Components!
26-MHz XstalOscillator
26-MHz XstalOscillator
DiplexerDiplexer
925-960MHz RF SAW Filter925-960MHz
RF SAW Filter
1805-1880MHz RF SAW Filter
1805-1880MHz RF SAW Filter
897.5±17.5MHz RF SAW Filter
897.5±17.5MHz RF SAW Filter
RF Power Amplifier
RF Power Amplifier
Dual-Band Zero-IF Transistor Chip
Dual-Band Zero-IF Transistor Chip
3420-3840MHz VCO
3420-3840MHz VCO
90o0o
A/D
A/D
RF PLL
Diplexer
From TX
RF BPF
Mixer I
Mixer Q
LPF
LPF
RXRF LO
XstalOsc
I
Q
AGC
AGC
LNA
Antenna
Problem: high-Q passives pose a bottleneck against miniaturizationProblem: high-Q passives pose a bottleneck against miniaturization
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Multi-Band Wireless Handsets
Duplexer
90o0o
A/D
A/D
RXRF ChannelSelect PLL
I
Q
LPF
LPF
RXRF LO
I
QAGC
AGC
LNA
Duplexer RF BPF
LNAFrom TX
LNA
LNA
RF BPF
RF BPF
RF BPF
WCDMAWCDMA
CDMACDMA--20002000
DCS 1800DCS 1800
PCS 1900PCS 1900
LNA
RF BPF
Duplexer
LNA RF BPF
GSM 900GSM 900
CDMACDMA
From TX
From TX90o
0o
I
Q
Tank
÷ (N+1)/N XstalOsc
Antenna
• The number of off-chip high-Qpassives increases dramatically
• Need: on-chip high-Q passives
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
High-Q Resonator Needs
Duplexer
90o0o
A/D
A/D
RXRF ChannelSelect PLL
I
Q
LPF
LPF
RXRF LO
I
QAGC
AGC
LNA
Duplexer RF BPF
LNAFrom TX
LNA
LNA
RF BPF
RF BPF
RF BPF
WCDMAWCDMA
CDMACDMA--20002000
DCS 1800DCS 1800
PCS 1900PCS 1900
LNA
RF BPF
Duplexer
LNA RF BPF
GSM 900GSM 900
CDMACDMA
From TX
From TX90o
0o
I
Q
Tank
÷ (N+1)/N XstalOsc
Antenna
Best if Q >500Best if Q >500
Would likeQ’s >2,000
Would likeQ’s >2,000 Would like
Q’s >10,000Would likeQ’s >10,000
Best when highest Q
used
Best when highest Q
used
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Thin-Film Bulk Acoustic Resonator (FBAR)
• Piezoelectric membrane sandwiched by metal electrodesextensional mode vibration: 1.8 to 7 GHz, Q ~500-1,500dimensions on the order of 200μm for 1.6 GHzlink individual FBAR’s together in ladders to make filters
Agilent FBAR
• Limitations:Q ~ 500-1,500, TCf ~ 18-35 ppm/oCdifficult to achieve several different freqs. on a single-chip
h
freq ~ thicknessfreq ~ thickness
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Vibrating RF MEMS Wish List
•• MicroMicro--scale waferscale wafer--level fabricationlevel fabricationwould like >1,000 parts per die to at least achieve large-scale integration (LSI) complexityneed wafer-level packaging
•• SingleSingle--chip integrated circuit or chip integrated circuit or system capabilitysystem capability
discrete parts not interestingmust allow many different frequencies on a single-chipneed on-chip connectivityintegration w/ transistors desiredneed real time reconfigurability
•• QQ’’s >10,000 at RF might have a s >10,000 at RF might have a revolutionary impactrevolutionary impact
Frequencies should be determined by lateral
dimensions (e.g., by layout)
Frequencies should be determined by lateral
dimensions (e.g., by layout)
900 MHz
1800 MHz
433 MHz200 MHz
70 MHz
1900 MHz
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Multi-Band Wireless Handsets
Duplexer
90o0o
A/D
A/D
RXRF ChannelSelect PLL
I
Q
LPF
LPF
RXRF LO
I
QAGC
AGC
LNA
Duplexer RF BPF
LNAFrom TX
LNA
LNA
RF BPF
RF BPF
RF BPF
WCDMAWCDMA
CDMACDMA--20002000
DCS 1800DCS 1800
PCS 1900PCS 1900
LNA
RF BPF
Duplexer
LNA RF BPF
GSM 900GSM 900
CDMACDMA
From TX
From TX90o
0o
I
Q
Tank
÷ (N+1)/N XstalOsc
Antenna
• The number of off-chip high-Qpassives increases dramatically
• Need: on-chip high-Q passives
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
All High-Q Passives on a Single Chip
WCDMARF Filters
(2110-2170 MHz)
CDMA-2000RF Filters
(1850-1990 MHz)
DCS 1800 RF Filter(1805-1880 MHz)
PCS 1900 RF Filter(1930-1990 MHz)
GSM 900 RF Filter(935-960 MHz)
CDMA RF Filters(869-894 MHz)
0.25 mm
0.5 mm
Low Freq. Reference Oscillator Ultra-High
Q Tank
Optional RF Oscillator
Ultra-High QTanks
Vibrating Resonator62-MHz, Q~161,000
Vibrating Resonator62-MHz, Q~161,000
Vibrating Resonator1.5-GHz, Q~12,000
Vibrating Resonator1.5-GHz, Q~12,000
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Vibrating RF MEMS Wish List
•• MicroMicro--scale waferscale wafer--level fabricationlevel fabricationwould like >1,000 parts per die to at least achieve large-scale integration (LSI) complexityneed wafer-level packaging
•• SingleSingle--chip integrated circuit or chip integrated circuit or system capabilitysystem capability
discrete parts not interestingmust allow many different frequencies on a single-chipneed on-chip connectivityintegration w/ transistors desiredneed real time reconfigurability
•• QQ’’s >10,000 at RF might have a s >10,000 at RF might have a revolutionary impactrevolutionary impact
Frequencies should be determined by lateral
dimensions (e.g., by layout)
Frequencies should be determined by lateral
dimensions (e.g., by layout)
900 MHz
1800 MHz
433 MHz200 MHz
70 MHz
1900 MHz
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06• Fabrication steps compatible with planar IC processing
Surface Micromachining
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
• Completely monolithic, low phase noise, high-Q oscillator (effectively, an integrated crystal oscillator)
• To allow the use of >600oC processing temperatures, tungsten (instead of aluminum) is used for metallization
OscilloscopeOutput
Waveform
Single-Chip Ckt/MEMS Integration
[Nguyen, Howe 1993][Nguyen, Howe JSSC’99]
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Vibrating RF MEMS Wish List
•• MicroMicro--scale waferscale wafer--level fabricationlevel fabricationwould like >1,000 parts per die to at least achieve large-scale integration (LSI) complexityneed wafer-level packaging
•• SingleSingle--chip integrated circuit or chip integrated circuit or system capabilitysystem capability
discrete parts not interestingmust allow many different frequencies on a single-chipneed on-chip connectivityintegration w/ transistors desiredneed real time reconfigurability
•• QQ’’s >10,000 at RF might have a s >10,000 at RF might have a revolutionary impactrevolutionary impact
Frequencies should be determined by lateral
dimensions (e.g., by layout)
Frequencies should be determined by lateral
dimensions (e.g., by layout)
Best if systems can be reconfigured w/o the need
for RF MEMS switches
Best if systems can be reconfigured w/o the need
for RF MEMS switches
900 MHz
1800 MHz
433 MHz200 MHz
70 MHz
1900 MHz
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Vibrating RF MEMS
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Basic Concept: Scaling Guitar StringsGuitar String
Guitar
Vibrating “A”String (110 Hz)Vibrating “A”
String (110 Hz)
High Q
110 Hz Freq.
Vib.
Am
plitu
de
Low Q
r
ro m
kfπ21
=
Freq. Equation:
Freq.
Stiffness
Mass
fo=8.5MHzQvac =8,000
Qair ~50
μMechanical Resonator
Performance:Lr=40.8μm
mr ~ 10-13 kgWr=8μm, hr=2μmd=1000Å, VP=5VPress.=70mTorr
[Bannon et al JSSC’00]
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
• Constructed in SiC material w/ 30 nm Al metallization for magnetomotive pickup
Lr
Wr
h
Frequency [GHz]
Mag
neto
mot
ive
Res
p. [n
V]
Design/Performance:Lr =1.1 μm, Wr =120 nm, h= 75 nm
fo=1.029 GHz, Q =500 @ 4K, vacuum
Design/Performance:Lr =1.1 μm, Wr =120 nm, h= 75 nm
fo=1.029 GHz, Q =500 @ 4K, vacuum
[Roukes, Zorman 2002]
Nanomechanical Vibrating Resonator
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Scaling-Induced Performance Limitations
Mass Loading Noise
• Differences in rates of adsorption and desorption of contaminant molecules
mass fluctuationsfrequency fluctuations
Temperature Fluctuation Noise
• Absorption/emission of photons
temperature fluctuationsfrequency fluctuations
ContaminantMolecules
NanoresonatorMass ~10-17 kg
mk
2π1
of =
Photons
NanoresonatorVolume ~10-21 m3
• Problem: if dimensions too small phase noise significant!• Solution: operate under optimum pressure and temperature
[J. R. Vig, 1999]
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Radial-Contour Mode Disk Resonator
VP
vi
Input Electrode
Output Electrode
io ωωο
ivoi
Q ~10,000Disk
Supporting Stem
Smaller mass higher freq. range and lower series Rx
Smaller mass higher freq. range and lower series Rx(e.g., mr = 10-13 kg)(e.g., mr = 10-13 kg)
Young’s Modulus
Density
Mass
Stiffness
RE
mkf
r
ro
121
⋅∝=ρπ
Frequency:
R
VP
C(t)
dtdCVi Po =
Note: If VP = 0V device off
Note: If VP = 0V device off
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Low Loss Switch Needs
Duplexer
90o0o
A/D
A/D
RXRF ChannelSelect PLL
I
Q
LPF
LPF
RXRF LO
I
QAGC
AGC
LNA
Duplexer RF BPF
LNAFrom TX
LNA
LNA
RF BPF
RF BPF
RF BPF
WCDMAWCDMA
CDMACDMA--20002000
DCS 1800DCS 1800
PCS 1900PCS 1900
LNA
RF BPF
Duplexer
LNA RF BPF
GSM 900GSM 900
CDMACDMA
From TX
From TX90o
0o
I
Q
Tank
÷ (N+1)/N XstalOsc
Antenna
Low loss switch
Low loss switch
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Micromechanical Switch
[C. Goldsmith, 1995]
• Operate the micromechanical beam in an up/down binary fashion
• Performance: I.L.~0.1dB, IIP3 ~ 66dBm (extremely linear)• Issues: switching voltage ~ 50V, switching time: 1-5μs
Electrode
OutputInput
Dielectric
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
RF MEMS Switch (Radant)
• Metal cantilever DC switch3-terminal devicePt contact interfacehigh R silicon substrateelectrostatic actuation
Vactuate ~ 90V• Package: wafer-to-wafer
glass frit bonded caplow costenv. protection
100 μm
Drain
Gate
Beam
Source
Contact Detail
Packaged Device
• Reliability (gov’t tested):>1 T mechanical cycles>700 B cycles 100mW RF cold switch
• Reliability (Radant tested):>2.5 B cycles 2W RF cold switched>100 B cycles 0.5W RF cold switched
[Radant]
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
RF BPF
RF BPF
RF BPF
Multi-Band Wireless Handsets
Duplexer
90o0o
A/D
A/D
RXRF ChannelSelect PLL
I
Q
LPF
LPF
RXRF LO
I
QAGC
AGC
LNA
Duplexer RF BPF
LNAFrom TX
LNA
LNA
RF BPF
WCDMAWCDMA
CDMACDMA--20002000
DCS 1800DCS 1800
PCS 1900PCS 1900
LNA
Duplexer
LNA RF BPF
GSM 900GSM 900
CDMACDMA
From TX
From TX90o
0o
I
Q
Tank
÷ (N+1)/N XstalOsc
Antenna
Capacitively transduced
micromechanical resonators switch
themselves
Capacitively transduced
micromechanical resonators switch
themselves
No need for switches!
No need for switches!
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Input Electrode
Output Electrode
Disk
Supporting Stem
R11 22
VP vLO
LxCx Rx
VPCo Co
11 22
0V
Reconfigurable Capacitive Transducer
33
Open Circuit11 22
Co Co
ForceInput
ElectricalSignal Input
ωRFωLO
ωRFωLOωIF
ω
ω
FilterResponse
vLO
vRF11
2233
ωIF
( ) ( )tVVxCvvF LORFRFLORFLOd ωω −−∂∂
−= cos~21 2
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
-100-98-96-94-92-90-88-86-84
1507.4 1507.6 1507.8 1508 1508.2
1.51-GHz, Q=11,555 Nanocrystalline Diamond Disk μMechanical Resonator
• Impedance-mismatched stem for reduced anchor dissipation
• Operated in the 2nd radial-contour mode• Q ~11,555 (vacuum); Q ~10,100 (air)• Below: 20 μm diameter disk
PolysiliconElectrode R
Polysilicon Stem(Impedance Mismatched
to Diamond Disk)
GroundPlane
CVD DiamondμMechanical Disk
Resonator Frequency [MHz]
Mix
ed A
mpl
itude
[dB
]
Design/Performance:R=10μm, t=2.2μm, d=800Å, VP=7Vfo=1.51 GHz (2nd mode), Q=11,555
fo = 1.51 GHzQ = 11,555 (vac)Q = 10,100 (air)
[Wang, Butler, Nguyen MEMS’04]
Q = 10,100 (air)
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Self-Aligned Fabrication Process
• Strategy: make stem misalignment impossible• Below:
successive film depositionssimultaneous definition of disk shape and stem location
Silicon Substrate
SiliconNitridePolysiliconOxide Polydiamond
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Self-Aligned Fabrication Process
• Below:define electrode-to-resonator gap spacing via sacrificial oxide sidewall spaceretch stem anchor
Silicon Substrate
SacrificialOxide
SidewallSpacer
Photoresist
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Self-Aligned Fabrication Process
• Below:deposit thick polysiliconpattern to define stem and electrodes
Silicon Substrate
Polysilicon
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Self-Aligned Fabrication Process
• Result: micromechanical disk with perfectly centered stem and nano-scale electrode-to-resonator gaps
Silicon Substrate
Sturdy PolysiliconElectrode (stronger
than previous metal)
Sturdy PolysiliconElectrode (stronger
than previous metal)
Tiny Gaps (50 nm gaps have been achieved)
Tiny Gaps (50 nm gaps have been achieved)
Micromechanical Disk Structure
Micromechanical Disk Structure
Self-Aligned Stem Perfectly Placed at Disk Center
Self-Aligned Stem Perfectly Placed at Disk Center
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Output
Input Anchor
d = 80 nm• Right: zoom-in on the 80 nm gap achieved via the sacrificial sidewall spacer process
Tiny Lateral Transducer Gaps
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
All Silicon Spoke-Supported Rings
Frequency
vi
Support Beam
vovo
Input Electrode
Output ElectrodeNotchedSupport VP
Frequency
vi
Support Beam
vovo
Input Electrode
Output ElectrodeNotchedSupport VP
Refill StemRefill Stem
Frequency
vi
Support Beam
vovo
Input Electrode
Output ElectrodeNotchedSupport VP
Frequency
vi
Support Beam
vovo
Input Electrode
Output ElectrodeNotchedSupport VP
Refill StemRefill Stem
[S.-S Li, et al., MEMS’04]
1204.3 1204.4 1204.5 1204.6 1204.7 1204.8 1204.9 1205 1205.1 1205.2 1205.3-101
-100
-99
-98
-97
-96
-95
-94
-93
-92
-91
ri=11.8μm ro=18.7μm VP=8Vfo=1.205GHz Q=14,603vRF=6.32VvLO=10VPP
Frequency [MHz]
Tran
smis
sion
[dB
m]
3rd Mode via mixing measurement
Notch in UHF
1204.3 1204.4 1204.5 1204.6 1204.7 1204.8 1204.9 1205 1205.1 1205.2 1205.3-101
-100
-99
-98
-97
-96
-95
-94
-93
-92
-91
ri=11.8μm ro=18.7μm VP=8Vfo=1.205GHz Q=14,603vRF=6.32VvLO=10VPP
Frequency [MHz]
Tran
smis
sion
[dB
m]
3rd Mode via mixing measurement
ri=11.8μm ro=18.7μm VP=8Vfo=1.205GHz Q=14,603vRF=6.32VvLO=10VPP
Frequency [MHz]
Tran
smis
sion
[dB
m]
3rd Mode via mixing measurement
Notch in UHF
Q ~ 14,600 at 1.2GHzQ ~ 14,600 at 1.2GHz
Reflect energy back into the ring structure Allow high Q
in an all-silicon structure
Reflect energy back into the ring structure Allow high Q
in an all-silicon structure
Direct Support
λ/4λ/4 λ/4λ/4
Longitudinal Mode Quarter Wavelength
Supports
Longitudinal Mode Quarter Wavelength
Supports
Notched Support
Mix
ed A
mpl
itude
[dB
m]
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Output
Input
Input
Output
Support Beams
Wine Glass Disk Resonator
R = 32 μm
Anchor
Anchor
Resonator DataR = 32 μm, h = 3 μmd = 80 nm, Vp = 3 V
Resonator DataR = 32 μm, h = 3 μmd = 80 nm, Vp = 3 V
-100
-80
-60
-40
61.325 61.375 61.425
fo = 61.37 MHzQ = 145,780
Frequency [MHz]
Unm
atch
ed T
rans
mis
sion
[dB
]
Wine-Glass Disk Resonator
[Y.-W. Lin, Nguyen, JSSC Dec. 04]
node
node
node
node
Compound Mode (2,1)
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
•Freq.-Q product rising exponentially over the past years
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
1015
109
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
Year
Freq
uenc
y-Q
Prod
uct
silicon
diamond
silicon
silicon
silicon
silicon
silicon
fo = 1.51 GHzQ = 11,555
fo = 1.51 GHzQ = 11,555
silicon
μMechanical Resonator fo-Q Product
Intrinsic material Q limit nowhere
in sight?
Intrinsic material Q limit nowhere
in sight?
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Matching ToleranceMatching ToleranceMatching Tolerance
1.5GHz, Q >10,000 in air [Wang, Nguyen, MEMS’04]
1.5GHz, Q >10,000 in air [Wang, Nguyen, MEMS’04]
Breaking Down the Device Barriers
Frequency RangeFrequency RangeNoiseNoise
Quality FactorQuality Factor
71MHz Array, Rx~480Ω[Demirci, Nguyen, Trans’05]71MHz Array, Rx~480Ω
[Demirci, Nguyen, Trans’05]
473MHz, Rx~80Ω[Piazza, Pisano, MEMS’05]
473MHz, Rx~80Ω[Piazza, Pisano, MEMS’05]
13.1MHz Osc. [Kaajakari, Seppa, EDL’04]
13.1MHz Osc. [Kaajakari, Seppa, EDL’04]
16kHz Osc. [Nguyen, Franke, King, Howe,
‘93-’02]
16kHz Osc. [Nguyen, Franke, King, Howe,
‘93-’02]
18ppm over 25-125oC [Hsu, Nguyen, MEMS’02]
18ppm over 25-125oC [Hsu, Nguyen, MEMS’02] <2ppm over 12 mos.
[Kim, Kenny, Trans’05]<2ppm over 12 mos.[Kim, Kenny, Trans’05]
Thermal Stability
Thermal Stability
Aging StabilityAging
Stability
High ImpedanceHigh ImpedanceHigh ImpedanceRF MEMS CktRF MEMS Ckt
Power Handling
Power HandlingPower
HandlingIntegration w/ Transistors
PackagingPackagingPackagingIntegration w/ Transistors
Integration w/ Transistors
Absolute ToleranceAbsolute Tolerance
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Integrated Micromechanical Circuits
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Micromechanical Filter Design Basics
RQ
vo
vi
RQ
VP
ω
xovi
ωo ω
xovi
ωo ω
vovi
ωo ω
vovi
ωo
Disk Resonator
Coupling Beam
Bridging Beam
Termination Resistor
Loss Pole
Loss Pole
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
8.7 8.9 9.1 9.3Frequency [MHz]
Tran
smis
sion
[dB
]
Pin=-20dBm
In Out
VP
Sharper roll-off
Sharper roll-off
Loss PoleLoss Pole
Performance:fo=9MHz, BW=20kHz, PBW=0.2%
I.L.=2.79dB, Stop. Rej.=51dB20dB S.F.=1.95, 40dB S.F.=6.45
Performance:fo=9MHz, BW=20kHz, PBW=0.2%
I.L.=2.79dB, Stop. Rej.=51dB20dB S.F.=1.95, 40dB S.F.=6.45
Design:Lr=40μm
Wr=6.5μm hr=2μm
Lc=3.5μmLb=1.6μm VP=10.47VP=-5dBm
RQi=RQo=12kΩ
[S.-S. Li, Nguyen, FCS’05]
3CC 3λ/4 Bridged μMechanical Filter
[Li, et al., UFFCS’04]
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Micromechanical Filter Circuit
1/krmr cr 1/krmr cr 1/krmr cr-1/ks -1/ks
1/ks
-1/ks -1/ks
1/ks
1/kb 1/kb
-1/kb
Co Co
1:ηe ηe:11:ηc 1:ηcηc:1 ηc:1
1:ηb ηb:1
λ/4
λ/4
3λ/4Input
Outputvi
RQ
RQ
vo
VP
Bridging BeamCoupling Beam
Resonator
ω
vovi
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Micromechanical Filter Circuit
1/krmr cr 1/krmr cr 1/krmr cr-1/ks -1/ks
1/ks
-1/ks -1/ks
1/ks
1/kb 1/kb
-1/kb
Co Co
1:ηe ηe:11:ηc 1:ηcηc:1 ηc:1
1:ηb ηb:1
λ/4
λ/4
3λ/4Input
Outputvi
RQ
RQ
vo
VP
Bridging BeamCoupling Beam
Resonator
ω
vovi
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Micromechanical Filter Circuit
1/krmr cr 1/krmr cr 1/krmr cr-1/ks -1/ks
1/ks
-1/ks -1/ks
1/ks
1/kb 1/kb
-1/kb
Co Co
1:ηe ηe:11:ηc 1:ηcηc:1 ηc:1
1:ηb ηb:1
λ/4
λ/4
3λ/4Input
Outputvi
RQ
RQ
vo
VP
Bridging BeamCoupling Beam
Resonator
ω
vovi
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
ω
vovi
Micromechanical Filter Circuit
1/krmr cr 1/krmr cr 1/krmr cr-1/ks -1/ks
1/ks
-1/ks -1/ks
1/ks
1/kb 1/kb
-1/kb
Co Co
1:ηe ηe:11:ηc 1:ηcηc:1 ηc:1
1:ηb ηb:1
λ/4
λ/4
3λ/4Input
Outputvi
RQ
RQ
vo
VP
Bridging BeamCoupling Beam
Resonator
All circuit element values determined
by CAD layout
All circuit element values determined
by CAD layout
Amenable to automated circuit
generation
Amenable to automated circuit
generation
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
8.7 8.9 9.1 9.3
High-Order Micromechanical Filter
[Wang, MEMS’97]
High-Order Micromechanical Filter
[Wang, MEMS’97]HF Micromech. Filter[Bannon, IEDM’96]
HF Micromech. Filter[Bannon, IEDM’96]
fo = 340kHzIL < 0.6dBRQ = 364kΩ
fo = 340kHzIL < 0.6dBRQ = 364kΩ
Frequency [MHz]
Tran
smis
sion
[dB
]
Sharper roll-offs
Sharper roll-offs
Bridged μMech. Filter[S.-S. Li, UFFCS’2004]Bridged μMech. Filter[S.-S. Li, UFFCS’2004]
fo = 9.3MHzIL < 2.8dBRQ = 12kΩ
fo = 9.3MHzIL < 2.8dBRQ = 12kΩ
fo = 7.8 MHzIL < 2dBRQ = 14.7kΩ
fo = 7.8 MHzIL < 2dBRQ = 14.7kΩ
Loss poleLoss pole
• MEMS Filters excellent insertion loss• Problem: High Impedance & poor power handling
Demo’ed Micromechanical FiltersMD2
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Square-Plate Micromechanical
Resonator
Coupling Beam
h
Ws
gap, do
Lr
50Ω-Terminated 68-MHz Coupled-Array μMechanical Filter
-21
-18
-15
-12
-9
-6
-3
0
67.60 67.80 68.00 68.20 68.40 68.60Frequency [MHz]
Tran
smis
sion
[dB
]
Use square-plate μmechanical
resonator arrays
Use square-plate μmechanical
resonator arrays
Lower end resonator impedance & raise
power handling
Lower end resonator impedance & raise
power handling
50Ω termination w/ L-network
50Ω termination w/ L-network
Lr = 16μmh = 2.2μmdo = 90nm
Lr = 16μmh = 2.2μmdo = 90nm
RQ = 12kΩRterm = 50ΩRQ = 12kΩRterm = 50Ω
fo=68MHzBW=190kHzPBW=0.28%I.L.<2.7dB
fo=68MHzBW=190kHzPBW=0.28%I.L.<2.7dB
[Demirci, Nguyen 2005]
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Wine Glass Disk Array Oscillator
VDD = 1.65 V
VSS = -1.65V
M3M4
M1 M2
MRf
Vbias2
Vbias1
M11 M12 M13 M14
Vcm
M17M18
M16M15Output
Input
M5
Shunt-Shunt Feedback Tranresistance Amplifier
Common Mode Feedback Bias Circuit
VP
vi
Bond Wire
Bond Wire
MOS ResistorMOS
Resistor
io
Wine-Glass Disk Array-Composite Resonator
Wine-Glass Disk Array-Composite Resonator
VP=7V Rx=2.5kΩ
Q = 118,900
VP=7V Rx=2.5kΩ
Q = 118,900
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
OutputOutputCustom IC fabricated via TSMC 0.35μm process
Custom IC fabricated via TSMC 0.35μm process
InputInput
GSM-Compliant Oscillator
[Y.-W. Lin, Nguyen, IEDM’05]
-160
-140
-120
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
1.E+01 1.E+02 1.E+03 1.E+04 1.E+05
Offset Frequency [Hz]
Phas
e N
oise
[dB
c/H
z]
9-Wine-Glass Disk ArrayQ = 118,900 , Rx = 2.56 kΩ9-Wine-Glass Disk ArrayQQ = 118,900 = 118,900 , Rx = 2.56 kΩ
9-WG Disk Array @ 62 MHz9-WG Disk Array @ 62 MHz
Single WG Disk @ 62 MHzSingle WG Disk @ 62 MHz
Down to 13 MHz
Down to 13 MHz
GSM specGSM spec
Satisfies Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM)
phase noise specifications!
Satisfies Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM)
phase noise specifications!
All made possible by mechanical circuit design!
All made possible by mechanical circuit design!
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Wireless Phone
So Many Passive Components!
26-MHz XstalOscillator
26-MHz XstalOscillator
DiplexerDiplexer
925-960MHz RF SAW Filter925-960MHz
RF SAW Filter
1805-1880MHz RF SAW Filter
1805-1880MHz RF SAW Filter
897.5±17.5MHz RF SAW Filter
897.5±17.5MHz RF SAW Filter
RF Power Amplifier
RF Power Amplifier
Dual-Band Zero-IF Transistor Chip
Dual-Band Zero-IF Transistor Chip
3420-3840MHz VCO
3420-3840MHz VCO
90o0o
A/D
A/D
RF PLL
Diplexer
From TX
RF BPF
Mixer I
Mixer Q
LPF
LPF
RXRF LO
XstalOsc
I
Q
AGC
AGC
LNA
Antenna
Problem: high-Q passives pose a bottleneck against miniaturizationProblem: high-Q passives pose a bottleneck against miniaturizationNo longer a problem!No longer a problem!
Use as many high-Qpassives as desired!Use as many high-Qpassives as desired!
Seemingly limitless possibilities …
Seemingly limitless Seemingly limitless possibilities possibilities ……
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
RF Channel-Selection
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Motivation: Need for High Q
Antenna
Demodulation Electronics
The higher the Q of the Pre-
Select Filter the simpler the demodulation
electronics
The higher the Q of the Pre-
Select Filter the simpler the demodulation
electronics
Pre-SelectFilter in the GHz Range
Presently use resonators
with Q’s ~ 400
Presently use resonators
with Q’s ~ 400
Wireless Phone
Rec
eive
dPo
wer
FrequencyωRF
DesiredSignal
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Motivation: Need for High Q
Antenna
Demodulation Electronics
The higher the Q of the Pre-
Select Filter the simpler the demodulation
electronics
The higher the Q of the Pre-
Select Filter the simpler the demodulation
electronics
Pre-SelectFilter in the GHz Range
Presently use resonators
with Q’s ~ 400
Presently use resonators
with Q’s ~ 400
Wireless Phone
Rec
eive
dPo
wer
FrequencyωRF
DesiredSignal
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Motivation: Need for Q’s > 10,000
Antenna
Demodulation Electronics
The higher the Q of the Pre-
Select Filter the simpler the demodulation
electronics
The higher the Q of the Pre-
Select Filter the simpler the demodulation
electronics
Pre-SelectFilter in the GHz Range
Presently use resonators
with Q’s ~ 400
Presently use resonators
with Q’s ~ 400
Wireless Phone
Rec
eive
dPo
wer
FrequencyωRF
DesiredSignal
If can have resonator
Q’s > 10,000
If can have resonator
Q’s > 10,000
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Motivation: Need for Q’s > 10,000
Antenna
Demodulation Electronics
The higher the Q of the Pre-
Select Filter the simpler the demodulation
electronics
The higher the Q of the Pre-
Select Filter the simpler the demodulation
electronics
Pre-SelectFilter in the GHz Range
Presently use resonators
with Q’s ~ 400
Presently use resonators
with Q’s ~ 400
Wireless Phone
Rec
eive
dPo
wer
FrequencyωRF
DesiredSignal
If can have resonator
Q’s > 10,000
If can have resonator
Q’s > 10,000
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Motivation: Need for Q’s > 10,000
Antenna
Demodulation Electronics
The higher the Q of the Pre-
Select Filter the simpler the demodulation
electronics
The higher the Q of the Pre-
Select Filter the simpler the demodulation
electronics
Pre-SelectFilter in the GHz Range
Presently use resonators
with Q’s ~ 400
Presently use resonators
with Q’s ~ 400
If can have resonator
Q’s > 10,000
If can have resonator
Q’s > 10,000
Wireless Phone
Non-Coherent FSK Detector?(Simple, Low Frequency, Low Power)
Front-End RF Channel Selection
Front-End RF Channel Selection
Rec
eive
dPo
wer
FrequencyωRF
DesiredSignal
Substantial Savings in Cost and Battery PowerSubstantial Savings in
Cost and Battery Power
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Motivation: Need for Q’s > 10,000
Antenna
Demodulation Electronics
The higher the Q of the Pre-
Select Filter the simpler the demodulation
electronics
The higher the Q of the Pre-
Select Filter the simpler the demodulation
electronics
Pre-SelectFilter in the GHz Range
Presently use resonators
with Q’s ~ 400
Presently use resonators
with Q’s ~ 400
If can have resonator
Q’s > 10,000
If can have resonator
Q’s > 10,000
Wireless Phone
Direct-Sampling A/D Converter Software-Defined Radio
Maximum Flexibility one circuit satisfies all
comm. standards
Maximum Flexibility one circuit satisfies all
comm. standardsFront-End RF
Channel SelectionFront-End RF
Channel Selection
Rec
eive
dPo
wer
FrequencyωRF
DesiredSignal
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
RF Channel-Select Filter Bank
Bank of UHF μmechanical
filters
Bank of UHF μmechanical
filters
Switch filters on/off via
application and removal of dc-bias VP, controlled by
a decoder
Switch filters on/off via
application and removal of dc-bias VP, controlled by
a decoderTr
ansm
issi
on
Freq.
Tran
smis
sion
Freq.
Tran
smis
sion
Freq.
1 2 n3 4 5 6 7RF Channels
Removes all interferers!
Removes all interferers!
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
02468
101214161820
100 1000 10000 100000
RF Channel-Selection: Need Q >10,000
• Below: plots for a 4-resonator Chebyshev filter with 0.01dB passband ripple
Constituent Resonator Q
Filte
r Ins
ertio
n Lo
ss [d
B]
DCS 1800Pre-Select4.17%BW
DCS 1800Pre-Select4.17%BW
WCDMARF Ch-Select
0.23%BW
WCDMARF Ch-Select
0.23%BWDCS 1800
RF Ch-Select0.03%BW
DCS 1800RF Ch-Select
0.03%BW
CDMA-2000RF Ch-Select
0.07%BW
CDMA-2000RF Ch-Select
0.07%BW
C. T.-C. Nguyen, “Advances in RF MEMS and MEMS-Based RF Front-End Architectures,” TAPAS’06, 8/5/06
Conclusions
•• Vibrating RF MEMS have achievedVibrating RF MEMS have achievedQ’s >10,000 at GHz frequencies in sizes less than 20 μm in diameter and w/o the need for vacuum encapsulationTCf’s < -0.24 ppm/oC (better than quartz)aging at least on par with quartzcircuit-amenable characteristics VLSI potential
•• Probable evolution of products based on vibrating RF MEMS:Probable evolution of products based on vibrating RF MEMS:timing devices using micromechanical resonatorscommunication-grade frequency synthesizerssingle-chip of all needed high-Q passivesmechanical radio front-ends …
•• In ResearchIn Research: Time to turn our focus towards mechanical : Time to turn our focus towards mechanical circuit design and mechanical integrationcircuit design and mechanical integration
maximize, rather than minimize, use of high-Q componentse.g., RF channelizer paradigm-shift in wireless designeven deeper frequency computation
•• Beginnings of a revolution reminiscent of the IC revolution?Beginnings of a revolution reminiscent of the IC revolution?