Frank Cowell: EC426 Public Economics MSc Public Economics 2010/11 Tax Compliance 14 February 2010.
Active vs Passive Decisions and Crowd-Out in Retirement...
Transcript of Active vs Passive Decisions and Crowd-Out in Retirement...
Active vs Passive Decisions and Crowd-Out in Retirement Savings
Accounts: Evidence from Denmark
Chetty, Friedman, Leth-Petersen, Nielsen and Olsen (2014)
By: Tony Amornrat and Gong Yi
Outline:
1) Introduction
2) Price Subsidy
3) Heterogeneity in Behavioural Responses
IntroductionResearch Question:• Do retirement savings policies raise total savings or simply induce
individuals to shift savings across accounts?
Saving Policies
Automatic Contribution
Price Subsidy
Data:• Denmark: Merged data from income tax register, population register and
data from labour market research • Danish population from 1995 to 2009 • 4 million individuals (excluded individuals below 18 or over 60 and the self
employed)
Active vs. Passive
Automatic contributions affect the pension contributions of passive savers, whereas price subsidies affect the pension contributions of active savers.
Active savers : make savings decisions by maximizing utility, taking into account the subsidies and automatic contributions.
Passive savers : make fixed pension contributions that are invariant to the automatic contribution and subsidy.
Price SubsidyBackground
• 2 types of pension: Capital Pension and Annuity Pension
• Policy Change: In 1999, reduction in subsidy for capital pension for
individuals in the top tax cutoff.
• Cutoff: DKr 251,200 (US $38,600)
Analysis
• Effect of reduction of subsidy on contributions to capital pension
• The degree of active response
• Analysing Crowd-Out
Effect of Subsidies on Capital Pension Contributions
Effect of Subsidies on Capital Pension Contributions
Capital Pension Contribution
Indicator for the years including and after 1999
Indicator for having taxable income above top tax cutoff- Treatment Group
Coefficient of Interest: Effect of subsidy reduction on the level of capital pension contributions
Effect of Subsidies on Capital Pension Contributions
Effect of Subsidies on Capital Pension Contributions
The Degree of Active Response
• Reduction in individual capital contribution ignores the
substantial heterogeneity in response across individuals
• In our interests to find out the source for the observed
reduction in capital contribution
The Degree of Active Response
The Degree of Active Response
19%
Crowd-Out
• What happens to the money following the reduction in
capital pension contributions?
• Shift between different types of retirement
accounts
• Shift from retirement accounts to taxable accounts
Crowd-Out- Within Retirement Accounts
Crowd-Out- Within Retirement Accounts
• Individuals shift 57 cents of each
dollar they would have contributed to
capital pension account to annuity
pension instead due to the subsidy
change.
Crowd-Out- Taxable Savings
Crowd-Out- Taxable Savings
Full crowd-out from the
subsidy change. 98 cents
of each DKr 1 withdrawn
from retirement savings
accounts is shifted to
taxable savings account.
Heterogeneity of responses across individuals1) Are individuals currently making active choices more responsive to price
subsidies? 2) How does individual responsiveness relate to the frequency of changes in
pension contributions in other years ? 3) What observable characteristics can identify active savers ?
Results
1) The 1999 subsidy reduction has much larger effects on individuals starting a new pension in that year relative to those making pension contributions in previous years.
2) Individuals who actively change their pension contributions more frequently in other years are more responsive to the price subsidy change and more likely to offset automatic contributions by changing their own individual pension contributions.
3) Individuals who are wealthier, older, or have economics training are more responsive to price subsidies and more likely to offset automatic contributions.
Conclusion
1. Price subsidies are not effective in increasing saving rates.
• Majority of the savers are passive savers that do not respond to the
policy change.
• Even within active savers, they respond by shifting savings across
accounts rather than increasing total savings
2. Take into account the characteristics of individuals when introducing
policies.
3. Support the arguments for using default options in crafting policies.