Active Pixel Sensors for Direct Detection of Soft X-rays

26
Active Pixel Sensors for Direct Detection of Soft X- rays Andrew Blue* a , R. Bates a , A. Clark c , S. Dhesi b , D. Maneuski a , J. Marchal b , P. Steadman b , G. Stewart a N. Tartoni b , R. Turchetta c a: University of Glasgow, School of Physics and Astronomy, Kelvin Building, University Avenue, Glasgow, G12 8QQ b: Diamond Light Source Ltd, Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE c: STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Harwell Oxford, Didcot, OX11 0QX

description

Active Pixel Sensors for Direct Detection of Soft X-rays. Andrew Blue* a , R. Bates a , A. Clark c , S. Dhesi b , D. Maneuski a , J. Marchal b , P. Steadman b , G. Stewart a N. Tartoni b , R. Turchetta c - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Active Pixel Sensors for Direct Detection of Soft X-rays

Page 1: Active Pixel Sensors for Direct Detection of Soft X-rays

Active Pixel Sensors for Direct Detection of Soft X-rays

Andrew Blue*a, R. Batesa, A. Clarkc , S. Dhesib, D. Maneuskia, J. Marchalb, P. Steadmanb, G. Stewarta N. Tartonib, R. Turchettac

a: University of Glasgow, School of Physics and Astronomy, Kelvin Building, University Avenue, Glasgow, G12 8QQb: Diamond Light Source Ltd, Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE c: STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Harwell Oxford, Didcot, OX11 0QX

Page 2: Active Pixel Sensors for Direct Detection of Soft X-rays

Andrew Blue PSD9 14/9/11 2

Introduction

• Motivation for CMOS APS• Lab Tests

– Photon Transfer Curve– QE

• Diffraction Experiment At

Diamond Light Source– Noise Sources– Signal-to-Noise Profiles

• Conclusions

Page 3: Active Pixel Sensors for Direct Detection of Soft X-rays

Andrew Blue PSD9 14/9/11 3

Charge Coupled Devices• CCDs collect charge within their pixel architecture, each pixel acting as a

capacitor.• Once the integration time is complete, each capacitor passes charge

sequentially down a column.• If a pixel saturates, charge can spread to neighbouring pixels (an effect

known as blooming).• Most popular imaging device, due to their low noise and high sensitivity.• CCDs often have thick, fully depleted substrates and epi-layers.

Page 4: Active Pixel Sensors for Direct Detection of Soft X-rays

Active Pixel Sensors

• Photon to Voltage conversion done within pixel

• Integrated electronics in circuit to suit applications (eg discriminator, flags)• Low mass, low power cameras.• Faster frame rates achievable.• Charge sensed inside pixel . . . No charge transfer. Greater radiation tolerance.•Design reduces streaking that can be prevalent in CCDs

Andrew Blue PSD9 14/9/11 4

Page 5: Active Pixel Sensors for Direct Detection of Soft X-rays

Motivation for CMOS APS

• The CMOS APS have fast frame rates.– Fastest CCD operation 0.1Hz– Fastest full frame CMOS APS operation 20Hz

• On-chip processing can combine the image sensor and image processing functions, increasing speed and reducing physical size.

• CMOS APS can read out a Region of Interest (RoI) for even faster frame rates

• CMOS APS are cheaper to fabricate

• CMOS APS do not have to be operated at low temperatures for reasonable signal to noise performance.

• They can be backthinned for improved detection of UV photons

Andrew Blue PSD9 14/9/11 5

How does APS compare to CCD’s for direct detection of soft X-rays?

Page 6: Active Pixel Sensors for Direct Detection of Soft X-rays

Vanilla APS

• Made as part of the M-I3 RC-UK Basic Technology grant

• 520x520 25m pixels (1.3cm x 1.3cm)

• A readout rate of 20Hz – 0.1 Hz (full frame mode)

• Region of Interest (ROI) readout – Readout rate of 24kHz for 6x6 region

• The sensor designed to allow back thinning

• Designed full well capacity of ~100k e-

• The pad layout allows for the butting of sensors on two sides.

• NOT designed specifically for synchrotron applications

6Andrew Blue PSD9 14/9/11

Page 7: Active Pixel Sensors for Direct Detection of Soft X-rays

Characterisation

• Before any demonstrator use, sensors must be fully characterised for – Noise

• Shot Noise• FPN• Read Noise• Dark Current

– Gain– Full Well Capacity– Linearity– Quantum Efficiency– Stability

• Similar for both CCD and CMOS devices (mostly)

• Imaging devices => tested with photons (not conventional “particle physics” approach)

Andrew Blue PSD9 14/9/11 7

Page 8: Active Pixel Sensors for Direct Detection of Soft X-rays

NoiseShot Noise

» The standard deviation for the number of interactions per pixel» Fundamentally related to the charge generated by a photon’s interaction

with a semiconductor

Fixed Pattern Noise » In sensors, some pixels collect charge more efficiently than others» This results in pixel-to-pixel sensitivity differences» This noise is “Fixed” as it is not random, but is spatially the same pattern

from image to image

Read Noise » Defined as any noise source encountered in imagers which is not a

function of signal

2/1SHOT )( II PP

Andrew Blue PSD9 14/9/11

SPNFPN

API )(READ

8

Page 9: Active Pixel Sensors for Direct Detection of Soft X-rays

Photon Transfer Curve• The PTC (or Photon Transfer curve) is the most curial and important analytical

technique for imaging sensors• The rms noise is plotted as a function of average signal at different light levels (or

exposure times)• The plot is made in log-log scale

Andrew Blue PSD9 14/9/11 9

Page 10: Active Pixel Sensors for Direct Detection of Soft X-rays

PTC Measurements

• Illuminations achieved using super-bright, narrow bandwidth LED (520nm) Coupled with diffuser produced uniform illumination (<1% dev.)

• The light intensity was varied by changing the voltage applied to the

LED until saturation

• 100 Frames at each illumination stage

• Shot Noise area extrapolated from fit to

calculate the Camera Gain Constant

K (e-/DN)

‘Comparison of Methods for Estimating the Conversion Gain of

CMOS Active Pixel Sensors’

‘SE Bohndiek, A Blue, A Clark et al IEEE SENS J 8 (2008) pg 1733

10Andrew Blue PSD9 14/9/11

Page 11: Active Pixel Sensors for Direct Detection of Soft X-rays

Andrew Blue PSD9 14/9/11 11

Lab Measurements

Example PTC with FPN and read noise removed

Mean Gain:

K = 7.3 e-/ADU

100

101

102

103

104

100

101

102

103

Mean Signal (ADU)

Mea

n N

oise

(A

DU

)

Page 12: Active Pixel Sensors for Direct Detection of Soft X-rays

Backthinned – QE

• QE Improved in the low visible and UV

• “bump” at 230nm is actually beginning of absorption of UV in air

Comparison of Normal & Backthinned APS

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

180 230 280 330 380 430 480

Wavelength (nm)

Inte

ract

ive

QE

(%)

Non Backthinned

Backthinned

• Sensor used was backthinned using a mixed process of polishing, wet etch, and plasma etch

• Sensor was then flipped to allow detection from back side

12Andrew Blue PSD9 14/9/11

Page 13: Active Pixel Sensors for Direct Detection of Soft X-rays

Andrew Blue PSD9 14/9/11 13

Sensors Under Test

• CCD used: Princeton PIXIS-XO: 2048B– High Capacity and Low Noise modes for high or low flux applications.– Each mode has 3 different gain modes.

• APS used: Vanilla, developed by a UK funded collaboration (MI3)– Backthinned for enhanced UV detection.– Faster frame rates

Princeton PIXIS CCD Vanilla CMOS

Pixel Size 13.5 μm 25 μm

Number of Pixels 2048 x 2048 520 x 520

Total Dimensions 2.8 x 2.8 cm 1.3 x 1.3 cm

Frame Rate 0.1 – 0.003 Hz 20Hz – 0.1 Hz

Full Well Capacity 100 000 e- 100 000 e-

Operating Modes Low Noise Input

High Capacity Output

Analogue Readout

Digital Readout

Page 14: Active Pixel Sensors for Direct Detection of Soft X-rays

Andrew Blue PSD9 14/9/11 14

Diffraction Experiment

• Experiment performed at Diamond Light Source, Beamline I06.

• A permalloy sample was used to create a diffraction pattern.

– Permalloy is a Nickel-Iron alloy, used here as a representative test sample.

• Soft X-rays (700 eV) diffracted.• Sensor was back-illuminated and kept

in a vacuum.

• CCD kept at -55°C, Vanilla cooled from 20°C to -20°C.

• Noise, Signal to Noise, Peak to Trough, Dark Current and charge collect were all measured with both sensors.

Detector Beamline

Permalloy Sample

Page 15: Active Pixel Sensors for Direct Detection of Soft X-rays

Andrew Blue PSD9 14/9/11 15

CCD Diffraction Pattern

10s Integration Time

Low Noise Mode, -55°C

• Dashed line is where the line profile is taken from.

• Solid square indicates the area the vanilla sensor covered.

• 300s integration time shows some blooming in saturated pixels.

• Ratio of peak height to inter-peak average give a Peak-to-Trough value.

Page 16: Active Pixel Sensors for Direct Detection of Soft X-rays

Andrew Blue PSD9 14/9/11 16

CCD Diffraction Pattern

300s Integration Time

Low Noise Mode, -55°C

• Dashed line is where the line profile is taken from.

• Solid square indicates the area the vanilla sensor covered.

• 300s integration time shows some blooming in saturated pixels.

• Ratio of peak height to inter-peak average give a Peak-to-Trough value.

Peak

Trough

Page 17: Active Pixel Sensors for Direct Detection of Soft X-rays

Andrew Blue PSD9 14/9/11 17

Vanilla CMOS Diffraction

10s Integration Time

Digital Mode, -10°C• Longest integration time shows no blooming when saturated.

• Shortest integration time can still identify all peaks.

• Relative peak heights the same regardless of frame rate

Page 18: Active Pixel Sensors for Direct Detection of Soft X-rays

Andrew Blue PSD9 14/9/11 18

Vanilla CMOS DiffractionDigital Mode, -10°C

0.05s Integration Time• Longest integration time shows no blooming when saturated.

• Shortest integration time can still identify all peaks.

• Relative peak heights the same regardless of frame rate

Page 19: Active Pixel Sensors for Direct Detection of Soft X-rays

Andrew Blue PSD9 14/9/11 19

Noise• Common Mode Noise removed via subtraction of 2 consecutive frames and pedestal

subtraction.• Statistical variation of resultant frame is Read Noise and Shot Noise.

• Vanilla CMOS APS noise increases greatly at -20°C– Component(s) not designed for lower temperatures?

10-2

10-1

100

101

0

50

100

150

200

Integration Time (s)

Noi

se (

e- )

Vanilla Noise, Digital Mode

20 Degrees

10 Degrees

0 Degrees

-10 Degrees-20 Degrees

0 50 1000

20

40

60

Integration Time (s)

Noi

se (

e- )

CCD Noise

High Capacity, Gain 1

High Capacity, Gain 3Low Noise, Gain 1

Low Noise, Gain 3

Page 20: Active Pixel Sensors for Direct Detection of Soft X-rays

Andrew Blue PSD9 14/9/11 20

Signal to Noise

• Signal to Noise ratio calculated based on the charge collected from an unsaturated spot.

• Signal to Noise ratio increases linearly with integration time

• Princeton CCD maintained at a temperature of -55°C. S/N ratios calculated then averaged for different modes.

• Vanilla CMOS APS S/N calculated at -10°C in Digital mode.

10-2

10-1

100

101

102

102

103

104

105

106

Integration Time (s)

Inte

grat

ed S

igna

l/Noi

se

VanillaCCD

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

5

10

15

20

25

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Page 21: Active Pixel Sensors for Direct Detection of Soft X-rays

Andrew Blue PSD9 14/9/11 21

Summary of Results

Princeton PIXIS CCD Vanilla CMOS APS

Frame Rate 0.1 Hz – 0.003 Hz 20 Hz – 0.1 Hz(300fps ROI)

Gain High Capacity mode – ~15e-/ADULow Noise mode – ~3e-/ADU

Digital – 7e-/ADU

Operating Temperature -55°C -10°C

Read Noise HC mode - 50e-

LN mode - 20e-

28e-

Peak to Trough 102 – 104 101 – 103

Signal to Noise 104 – 106 103 – 104

Page 22: Active Pixel Sensors for Direct Detection of Soft X-rays

Andrew Blue PSD9 14/9/11 22

Conclusions

• Vanilla CMOS detector, at -10°C, showed comparable noise performance to the Princeton CCD.– Maximum noise of 50e- for both CCD and 28e- for Vanilla CMOS

APS

• At comparable frame rates (0.1Hz), both detectors showed similar S/N levels

• Charge collected increases linearly with integration time.

• Further research remains to be completed on characterising the Region of Interest and higher frame rates

• Future specially designed CMOS APS could have kHz frame rates with a comparable S/N.

Page 23: Active Pixel Sensors for Direct Detection of Soft X-rays

Andrew Blue PSD9 14/9/11 23

Dark Current• Dark images taken at a series of frame rates, for each readout mode and temperature.

• Gradient of mean dark signal against integration time gives dark current.

• Dark current should be linear on a log-scale.

• Digital mode’s on-chip electronics affected by cooling.

-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

10-6

10-5

Temperature (Degrees C)

Dar

k C

urre

nt (

elec

tron

s/m

icro

n2/s

) Dark Current

Vanilla Analogue ModeVanilla Digital Mode

Mean Frame

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 102000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

Integration Time (s)

Mea

n D

ark

Sig

nal (

e- )

y = 233*x + 2098

data2

data3

data4

data5

Page 24: Active Pixel Sensors for Direct Detection of Soft X-rays

Imager Noise

2/1READ

2FPN

2SHOT

2TOTAL )(

Total noise image Fixed noise Statistical noise

Andrew Blue PSD9 14/9/11

Page 25: Active Pixel Sensors for Direct Detection of Soft X-rays

Camera Gain Constant

• For a ‘black box’ camera system whose input exhibits shot noise characteristics

A B

K (A/B)

= A1/2 B ≠ A

• A sensitivity constant K(A/B) relates and transfers output signal and noise measurements to the input. In other words

A= BK(A/B)and

A = BK(A/B)

• Substituting the above 2 equations into = A1/2 and we get

K(A/B)= B/2B

• Input to an imaging sensor is measured in electrons (e-), and the output is measured in Digital Numbers (DN)

Andrew Blue PSD9 14/9/11

Page 26: Active Pixel Sensors for Direct Detection of Soft X-rays

Camera Gain Constant

2

BK(A/B)

B

• Input to an imaging sensor is measured in electrons (e-), and the output is measured in Digital Numbers (DN)

2

DNK(e/DN)

DN

Andrew Blue PSD9 14/9/11