A Pas 1 Final 1

8/3/2019 A Pas 1 Final 1

1/13

Employee Staff No. 39928

ANNUAL PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM(To be used by all Officers in Scale I, II & III)

Year Ending MARCH 2011

Name of the Appraisee R K SINGH

(in Capital Letters)

Designation & Scale MANAGER SCALE II

Place of Posting

As on date of appraisal AMINABAD LUCKNOW

Since when posted 05/06/2009

Name & Designation of SRI B M DUTTA

the Appraiser (In Capital Letters) (CHIEF MANAGER )

INSTRUCTIONS:1. This Annual Performance Appraisal (APA) report consists of following:

Part IBio-data profile

Part IIBusiness Dimension (Operations)(for officer posted as Branch in-charge)

Part IIISelf Appraisal for all officers in Scale I, II & III

Part IVOverall Assessment

Part VQualitative Performance Appraisal Report

Part VIAppraisal by Reviewing Authority

Part VIIModeration of Overall Assessment

Yardstick for evaluation on various parameters (for Branch in-charge)

Yardstick for evaluation on various parameters (other than Branch in-charge)

2. The Appraisee has to fill in the data under Part I & Part II. The Appraisee has to prepare his/her self appraisal inthis format (Part III). The format has to be prepared in duplicate as at 31

stMarch and submit original report to the

Appraiser before 10th

April.

3. Appraiser and Reviewing Authority to go through the instructions/yardsticks for evaluation given at theend of this format before evaluating the performance.

4. The Reporting Authority/Appraiser has to record their views/remarks and award marks under Part IV.5. The Appraiser shall also record his/her views/remarks under Part V within one week and forward original APA

report to Reviewing Authority before 20th

April.

6. The Reviewing Authority, after reviewing the appraisal, has to record his/her remarks and marks under Part IVand Part VI and forward the report to HRM Section of the respective Circle Office before 30

thApril.

8/3/2019 A Pas 1 Final 1

2/13

Name of the Appraisee R K SINGH Staff No 39928

Designation MANAGER Scale II For the Year Ending MARCH2011

PART I - BIO-DATA PROFILE

(A) PERSONAL DATA

Name R K SINGH Designation MANAGER

Date of Birth 08/10/1959 Age 51 YEAREducational Qualifications MSC.CAIIB II Professional Qualifications if any NIL

Date of Appointment/Recruitment in the Bank 05/11/1982

Name of the Post to which appointed/recruited CLERK

Date of Promotion to the present scale 10/06/2006

Date of assuming the charge of Present Assignment 05/06/2009

Date since when posted under the existing Appraiser 05/06/2009

(B) Assignments covering preceding Five (5) Years :

Sl

NoPosition Designation Scale Branch/Office Duration

1 INCHARGE

MANAGER

II KUNDOL 15/07/2006 to 03/06/2009

2 IInd LINE MANAGE

R

II AMINABAD

LUCKNOW

05/06/2009 to CONTINUE

to

to

to

(C) Total Exposure in the Officers Cadre during the Career SpanYears Months Years Months

In the capacity of Branch Head 4 In Rural Branch 3

In the capacity of Officer posted at

Branch/Circle Office/Head Office

10 In Semi Urban

Branch

NIL

In any other capacity Posted elsewhere(Pl specify)

In Urban / MetroBranches

11

Total 14 Total 14

(D) Indicate Training NeedsSl No Area to be trained Reasons

1 LARGE BORROWAL A/C TO STRENTHEN THE AREA

2 CREDIT APPRAISAL ------ ------DO------------

(E) Major Health Problems, if any

DISC SLIP PROBLEM IN SPINAL CORD

8/3/2019 A Pas 1 Final 1

3/13


Designation MANAGER Scale II For the Year Ending 2011

PART II - BUSINESS DIMENSION (OPERATIONS)

(to be filled by an Officer posted as Branch in-charge)

Parameters

As at the end

of previous

financial

year / taking

over charge

As at the end of

the financial

year

Year End

Target

% growth

(annualized)

Aggregate Deposits

Average Deposits

Amount of CASA Deposit

No. of Accounts in CASA Deposits

Gross Credit

Average Credit

Total Business

No. of A/cs

Amount

Advances under SME

Prioirity Sector Credit (if any)

i) Agricultural Credit

ii) Medium & Small

Enterprises (MSE) NOT APPLICABLE

iii) Other PSC

Retail Lending

Gross NPA

NPA - Cash Recovery

Non Fund and

Non Interest Income

Profit / Loss

(with TP)

Rating of the branch as per latest Inspection /

RBIA conducted

8/3/2019 A Pas 1 Final 1

4/13


Designation MANAGER Scale II For the Year Ending MARCH 2011

PART III - SELF-APPRAISAL FOR ALL OFFICERS IN SCALE I, II & III(To be filled by Appraisee)

(wherever required, Annexures may be used)2

i) Brief Duties and responsibilities / Key

Responsibility Areas (KRA)

(to be filled by an Officer posted as other than

Branch in-charge only)

ACHIEVE QUARTERLY DEPOSIT TARGETS B

AGGREGATE AND AVERAGE.SUBMISSI

DEPOSIT AND OTHER RETURNS.

INTERNAL CONTROL-UPTOHOUSEKEEPING,CONTROLL OVER SECURITY

OBSERVANCE OF SECURITY MEASURES.

INSPECTION-CLOSURE OF INSPECTION

TIMLY & TO UPGRADE THE RATTING.

TO WORK TO INCREASE THE PRODUCTIVI

PROFITABLITY OF THE BRANCH.

HRD & CUSTOMER SERVICE -TO M

COMPLAINT FREE & GOOD CUSTOMER S

AND CONDUCTING OF HRD ACTIVITIES.

KEEPING THE PREMISES NEET AND TID

ENSURING AMC OF ALL THE EQUIPMENTS,

COMPUTER H/W UPS ETC.OFFICIAL LANGUAGE -IMLEMENTATION O

ACHIEVE THE 100 % GOAL AND ALSO

SUBMISSION OF RELATED RETURNS.

ii) How far has been successful in meeting theduties and responsibilities entrusted?

I WAS NOT ONLY FULLY SUCCESFULL INMEETING THE ABOVE RESPONSIBILITIES

ENTRUSTED TO ME BUT ALSO DISCH-

ARGED OTHER DUTIES NOT YET INTRU-

STED TO ME BUT I FELT TO PERFORM IN

THE INTREST OF MY INSTITUTION

iii) Highlights of performance which are worth

mentioning

IN THE LAST 6 MONTHS WE HAVE OPENED

SB ACCOUNTS BY ARR

CONTINUOUS CASA CAMPS IN THE NEARBY

OF BRANCH AND ALSO

CANVASSING DOOR TO DOOR.

ALSO MOBILISED GOOD AMOUNT OFINSURANCE BUSINESS.

SINCE LAST TWO YEARS THERE W

DIFFERENCE IN THE ATM.NOT ONLY WE TA

BUT ALSO MAINTAINING NIL DIFFERENC

LAST 10 MONTHS.

8/3/2019 A Pas 1 Final 1

5/13

iv) Efforts made to push the organization ascend

greater heights

I HAVE PAID MUCH ATTENTION TO T

CUSTOMERS THROUGH PHONE AND BY E

THIS I HAVE NOT ONLY PUSHED THE BAN

GREATER HEIGHTS BUT ALSO INCREASED T

DEPOSIT TO A GREAT EXTENT.

I HAVE CREATED CONFIDENCE AMON

CUSTOMERS BY GOOD CUSTOMER SERVICE.

v) Measures taken to strive for numero unoposition of the branchs/offices image in theneighbourhood

THROUGHOUT THE YEAR WE HAVE EXEXCELENT CUSTOMER SERVICE.WE HAV

MAINTAINED OUR ATM THROUGHOUT TH

AND STRIVED HARD TO MAINTAI

NUMEROUNO POSITION IN THE NEIGHBOUR

8/3/2019 A Pas 1 Final 1

6/13


Designation MANAGER Scale II For the Year Ending MARCH 2011

PART III - SELF-APPRAISAL FOR ALL OFFICERS IN SCALE I, II & III(To be filled by Appraisee)

vi) Measures taken to upgrade skills/knowledge

base

I HAVE GONE THROUGH CIRCUL

GUIDELINES/SPECIAL COMMUNICATIONS

OTHER IMPORTANT MATERIALS TO UPD

SELF AND MY COLLIGUES.

vii) Management support required to improve the

overall performance of the branch/office

YET THE SITUATION HAS IM

COMPARATIVELY STILL SUPPORT IS REQUI

IMPROVE THE CONSISTENCY OF THE FL

PACKAGE.SUPPORT IS ALSO REQUIRED TO R

THE SHORTCOMINGS OF THE PACKAGE.

(to be filled by an officer posted at Branch)viii)

a) What steps have been taken to increase

CASA deposit of the branch?

b) What steps have been taken for

recovery of NPA?

c) Has any new/special campaign been

launched for improvement of branch

business, CASA, NFNI Income,

Recovery of NPA etc.,?

d) Marketing initiatives to popularize the

usage of technology productsI&MB,ATM, RTGS etc.

What are the actual achievements in absolute

terms?

WE HAVE ORGANISED CASA CAMPS IN

BRANCH ON HOLDAYS/WORKING DAYS

SOLOMAN MARKET,AMINABAD

COLLEGE,NEHRU CROSS ETC.

ALSO DONE DOOR TO CANVASING

CONTACTED THE BORROWERS UNDER CAN

YES ORGANISED CASA CAMPS

DONE DOOR TO DOOR CANVASSING

CONTACTED GOVT.INSTITUTIONS LIKE

JAL NIGAM,INDIAN TOXICOLOGY RE

CENTRE, FOREST DEPARTMENT,PLANE

ETC.

IN OUR CASA CAMPAIGN WE HAVE POPUL

OUR TECHNOLOGY USES WHICH NOT ONLY

US TO POPULARISE THE SAME BUT ALSO

US IN GETTING MORE CASA ACCOUNTS

Date : Signature of the Appraisee

8/3/2019 A Pas 1 Final 1

7/13

Name of the Appraisee Staff No

Designation Scale For the Year Ending

Appraiser and Reviewing Authority to go through the instructions/yardsticks for evaluation given at the end of

this format before evaluating the performance.

PART IV - OVERALL ASSESSMENT (of Officer posted as Branch in-charge)

SlNo

Marks awarded by

Appraiser Reviewing

Authority

Moderation

Authority

i)

Achievement of

the quantitative

business figures

40

Extra-ordinary

Outstanding

Good

Average

Below Avg

Above 90 %

81 % to 90 %

61 % to

8/3/2019 A Pas 1 Final 1

8/13


Designation MANAGER Scale II For the Year Ending MARCH2011

Appraiser and Reviewing Authority to go through the instructions/yardsticks for evaluation given at the end of

this format before evaluating the performance.

PART IV - OVERALL ASSESSMENT

(of Officer posted as other than Branch in-charge or in Administration)

SlNo

Marks awarded by

Appraiser Reviewing

Authority

Moderation

Authority

i)

Key

ResponsibilityArea

Objective

assessment of theentrusted

assignment / Key

Responsibility

Area (KRA)

70

Extra-ordinary

Outstanding

GoodAverage

Below Avg

Above 90 %

81 % to 90 %

61 % to

8/3/2019 A Pas 1 Final 1

9/13



PART V - QUALITATIVE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL REPORT

Attribute Comments of the Appraiser in clear & unambiguous terms

Commitment to the taskassigned

Devotion to Duty

Relationship with peers,

superiors & subordinates

Potentiality to shoulder

higher responsibility

should the need arise

Public Relations

Intellectual honesty,

creativity & innovativequalities

Integrity

Quality of performance &

professionalism in the job

Space for special comments(Refer Note in Yardsticks for Evaluation)

Name

Designation

Date

8/3/2019 A Pas 1 Final 1

10/13



PART VI - APPRAISAL BY REVIEWING AUTHORITY

Remarks by Reviewing Authority

----------------------------------------------

Signature of Reviewing Authority

Name

:

Designation :

Date :

(If the marks awarded by the Reviewing Authority is 91% & above or is in variation with the Appraiser by

+/- 10%, specific reasons should be mentioned by the Reviewing Authority)

PART VIIMODERATION OF OVERALL ASSESSMENT

Reasons/Remarks of Moderation Authority

SIGNATURE OF MODERATION

AUTHORITY

Name & Designation

Date


8/3/2019 A Pas 1 Final 1

11/13


PART VIIIEVALUATION BY REVIEW COMMITTEE

Sl

NoBroad Parameter Sub-parameter

Total

MarksMarks Indicator

Marks awarded by

Review Committee

i)

OR

Achievement of thequantitative business figures

Cost effectiveness &profitability

Handling of qualitative

business

Customer responsiveness &

customer care

i)

Key Responsibility Area

(Officer posted asother than Branch

in-charge or in

Administration)

Objective assessment of theentrusted assignment / Key

Responsibility Area (KRA)

ii)

Managerial Ability

Responsiveness to handle the

assignment with minimal

error and quality output

Potential to drive theorganization to greater heights

iii)Judicious exercise ofDiscretionary Powers

Judicious use of DiscretionaryPowers

5

Extra-ordinary

Outstanding

Good

AverageBelow Avg

Above 90 %

81 % to 90 %

61 % to

8/3/2019 A Pas 1 Final 1

12/13

Sno Sub-Parameter Broad Yardsticks

1Achievement of the

quantitative business figures

a) How far the Officer has been successful in the business growth of the

branch?

b) To what extent the Officer is instrumental minimizing the NPA level of

the branch in real terms

c) How far the branch has been successful in tapping low cost deposits?

d) How far the rating of the branch has improved?

2

Cost Effectiveness &

Profitability

a) Whether the Officer is keeping the operational expenses of the branch

within controlled limits?b) How far the branch has contributed towards profitability?

3Handling of Qualitative

business

a) Degree of improving the Quality of Assets in the branch

b) General House-Keeping of the branch

4Customer Responsiveness &

CustomerCare

a) Whether the Officer is responsive enough to Customer-queries with

attentive mind?

b) Whether the Officer is really concerned about the customer care in true

sense?

c) Based upon the Customer grievances reported for the branch, how far the

grievances have been redressed?

5 Managerial Ability

To what extent, the Officer has acquired the following attributes:

a) Planning, Organising, Co-ordinating and Directing abilities

b) Leadership Style

c) Communication Skills (both verbal & written)d) Decision-making capability

e) Motivating attitude

f) Public Relation / Marketing skills

g) Extent of implementing the OL Guidelines

h) Attitude towards SC/ST/Weaker Section of Society/Poverty Alleviation

Programme

6Potential to drive the

organization to greater heights

a) Whether the Officer possesses necessary vision to combat

competitiveness?

b) Whether the Officer behaves like a catalyst to help the organization reach

greater heights in the years to come?

7

Ability to take business risks

consciously & venturing into

greener pasture for businessopportunities

a) How far the Officer takes business risks consciously for optimization of

Organisational gain?

b) Whether the Officer is keeping his/her eyes & ears open to tap businessopportunity as & when required?

8Judicious use of Discretionary

Powers

a) Whether the Officer is exercising Discretionary Powers (Lending &

Non-Lending) Judiciously & does not have the tendency to avoid using

powers by pushing the proposals upwards?

b) Whether the Officer is overstepping in the use of Discretionary Powers?

9

Outstanding performance

including creative and

innovative quality

a) To what extent the Officer is producing outstanding results?

b) Degree of creativity & innovativeness shown by the officer while

functioning

Note:(i) If Appraiser awards 81% or more marks to the Appraisee Officer, the reasons for such awarding should

be clearly mentioned by the Appraiser.

(ii) If the marks awarded by the Reviewing Authority is above 90 % or is in variation with the Appraiser by+/- 10%, specific reasons should be mentioned by the Reviewing Authority.

8/3/2019 A Pas 1 Final 1

13/13

Yardstick for evaluation on various parameters (other than Branch in-charge)Sno Sub-Parameter Broad Yardsticks

1Objective assessment of the

entrusted assignment / KRA

a) Whether the Officer is fully devoted to the job entrusted?

b) Whether the Officer is justifying his/her full days workload?c) Whether the Officer is capable enough to improve his/her

working while experiencing?

d) Whether the Officer is time conscious to complete the assignment

within the stipulated timeframe?e) Whether the Officer believes in team effort whenever the

situation demands?

f) Whether the Officer is fully dependable?

2 Managerial Ability

To what extent, the Officer has acquired the following attributes:

a) Planning, organizing, co-ordinating and directing abilities

b) Leadership Style

c) Communication skills (both verbal and written)

d) Decisionmaking capabilitye) Motivating attitude

f) Public Relation / Marketing Skills

g) Extent of implementing the OL guidelines

h) Attitude towards SC/ST/Weaker Section of Society/PovertyAlleviation Programme

3

Responsiveness to handle

the assignment with

minimal error and quality

output

a) Whether the Officer is responsive enough to handle the entrusted

assignment expeditiously?

b) Whether the Officer, in most of the cases, is producing the error

free quality output?

4

Potential to drive the

organisation to greater

heights

a) Whether the Officer possesses necessary vision to combat

competitiveness?

b) Whether the Officer behaves likes a catalyst to help the

organisation reach greater heights in the years to come?

5 Judicious use ofdiscretionary powers

a) Whether the officer is exercising Discretionary Powers (Lending

and Non-Lending) judiciously and does not have the tendency to

avoid using powers by pushing the proposals upwards?b) Whether the officer is overstepping in the use of Discretionary

Powers?

6

Outstanding Performance

including creative and

innovative quality

a) To what extent the Officer is producing outstanding results?

b) Degree of creativity and innovativeness shown by the officer

while functioning

Note:(i) If Appraiser awards 81% or more marks to the Appraisee Officer, the reasons for such awarding should

be clearly mentioned by the Appraiser.

(ii) If the marks awarded by the Reviewing Authority is above 90 % or is in variation with the Appraiser by+/- 10%, specific reasons should be mentioned by the Reviewing Authority.

A Pas 1 Final 1

Documents

Transcript of A Pas 1 Final 1