A new Agraecina spider species from the Balkan Peninsula ...€¦ · A new Agraecina spider species...
Transcript of A new Agraecina spider species from the Balkan Peninsula ...€¦ · A new Agraecina spider species...
Accepted by C. Haddad: 15 Mar. 2016; published: 30 May 2016
135
ZOOTAXA
ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition)
ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition)Copyright © 2016 Magnolia Press
Zootaxa 4117 (1): 135–140
http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/
Article
http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4117.1.8
http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:548825CE-8C2F-4F09-9AAD-C6C304F0A2E2
A new Agraecina spider species from the Balkan Peninsula (FYR Macedonia)
(Araneae: Liocranidae)
CHRISTO DELTSHEV1
& CHUNXIA WANG2
1
National Museum of Natural History, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1 Tsar Osvoboditel Blvd., 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria.
E-mail: [email protected]
2
Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China. E-mail: [email protected]
The genus Agraecina Simon, 1932 (Araneae: Liocrianidae) is closely related to Agroeca Westring, 1861 and differs from
the latter by the presence of only two pairs of ventral spines on metatarsi I and II, and the simple genital organs (Simon
1932; Bosmans 1999; Bosselaers 2009). Moreover, Bosselaers & Jocqué (2002, 2013) presented cladograms showing the
close relationship between both genera.
Currently, the genus Agraecina includes five species: A. canariensis Wunderlich 1992 from the Canary Islands; A.
cristiani (Georgescu, 1989), found in a cave in Romania; A. hodna Bosmans, 1999 from Algeria; A. lineata (Simon,
1878) distributed from Western Mediterranean to Kazakhstan; and A. rutilia (Simon, 1897) from Sierra Leone (WSC
2016). In this paper, Agraecina scupiensis sp. nov. (male and female) is described and illustrated from Skopje, FYR
Macedonia, where it was collected in grass habitats within the city (Fig. 1) (Stefanovska et al. 2008). The new species
has somatic and genital characters that correspond well to those of the genus Agraecina. The new taxon is compared to
other species of this genus.
FIGURE 1. Localities where spiders were collected (City of Skopje).
DELTSHEV & WANG136 · Zootaxa 4117 (1) © 2016 Magnolia Press
Specimens were collected using pitfall traps. Coloration is described from alcohol-preserved specimens. Specimens
were examined and measured using a Wild M5A stereomicroscope. Further details were studied and measured under an
Olympus BX41 compound microscope. All drawings were made using a drawing apparatus attached to a Leica
stereomicroscope. Male palps and female genitalia were examined and illustrated after they were dissected from the
spiders’ bodies. Photos were taken with an Olympus C7070 wide zoom digital camera mounted on an Olympus SZX12
stereomicroscope. The images were montaged using Helicon Focus image stacking software. Measurements of the legs
are taken from the dorsal side. Total length of the body includes the chelicerae. All measurements were taken in mm.
Abbreviations used in text include: AME, anterior median eyes; ALE, anterior lateral eyes; EM, embolus; MA, median
apophysis; CD, copulatory duct; ST, spermatheca; fe, femur; pa, patella; ti, tibia; mt, metatarsus; p, prolateral; d, dorsal;
r, retrolateral; v, ventral. Type specimens are deposited in the National Museum of Natural History (NMNHS), Sofia,
Bulgaria.
Liocranidae Simon, 1897
Agraecina Simon, 1932
Agraecina scupiensis Deltshev, sp. n.
Figs 2–13
Agraecina pr. hodna: Stefanovska et al. 2008: 37.
Type material. Holotype ♂, FYR Macedonia, Skopje, Maxari (240 m a.s.l.), grass vegetation, 02.X.2004. Paratypes: 1
♀, same data as for the holotype; 1 ♂, 19.IX.2004, also from Maxari; 1 ♂, Skopje, Karpoš (253 m a.s.l.), grass
vegetation, 23.VI.2004 (all leg. D. Stefanovska).
Etymology. Derived from the Roman name of the city of Skopje - Scupi.
Diagnosis. Somatic characteristics of the new species correspond to those of the genus, but the genitalia differ from
all other known species of the genus. Morphologically, the new species most closely resembles A. hodna Bosmans, 1999
and A. lineata (Simon, 1878), but the male is distinguished by the slender embolus, median apophysis with well-defined
hook apically and thicker tibial apophysis (Figs 4, 5, 10, 11); the female can be distinguished by the median septum
strongly narrowing posteriorly, and the distinct curved and oblique spermathecae (Figs 8, 9, 12, 13).
Description. Male holotype: Total length 4.68; prosoma, length 2.16, width 1.80; sternum length 1.36, width 1.08;
opisthosoma, length 2.52.
Carapace yellowish, with anastomosing, radiating stripes (Fig 2). All eyes subequal, except ALE whose diameter is
about 30% larger than that of other eyes. AME almost touching, separated from ALE by 1/2 their diameter. Clypeus
slightly larger than diameter of AME. Chelicerae yellow, with three teeth along promarginal cheliceral rim, middle one
largest, two teeth on retromarginal rim. Abdomen grey to pale grey (Figs 2, 3). Legs yellowish to yellow-brown (Figs 2,
3). Leg spination - fe: I p 2 d 4; II p 1 d 4; III p 1 d 4; IV p 3 d 2 r 3; pt: I d 1; II d 1; III p 1 d 1; IV p 1 d 1; ti: I p 3 v 4; II
p 2 v 4; III p 2 d 2 r 2 v 3; IV p 4 d 2 r 2 v 3; mt: I p 2 r 1 v 2; II p 2 r 1 v 2; II p 3 r 3 v 4; IV p 4 r 4 v 4. Leg formula 4123,
measurements as in Table 1.
TABLE 1. Agraecina scupiensis sp. nov., leg measurements (male holotype).
Male palp (Figs 4, 5, 10, 11): Tibial apophysis well presented, pointed. Median apophysis with long apical part
curved as hook. Embolus oblique, long, thin.
Female paratype: Total length 5.04; prosoma, length 2.52, width 2.16; sternum length 1.26, width 1.08;
opisthosoma, length 2.52. All characters as described for male (Figs 6, 7). Leg measurements as in Table 2.
Legs Femur Patella Tibia Metatarsus Tarsus Total
I 1.98 1.08 1.8 1.55 1.26 7.67
II 1.73 0.97 1.62 1.44 1.15 6.91
III 1.62 0.9 1.37 1.62 1.08 6.59
IV 2.16 1.08 1.98 2.52 1.26 9.00
Zootaxa 4117 (1) © 2016 Magnolia Press · 137A NEW SPECIES OF BALKAN AGRAECINA SPIDER
FIGURES 2–5. Agraecina scupiensis sp. nov., male holotype. 2. Habitus, dorsal view; 3. Habitus, ventral view; 4. Male palp, ventral
view; 5. Male palp, retrolateral view. Scale bars: 2, 3—1 mm; 4, 5—0.5 mm.
DELTSHEV & WANG138 · Zootaxa 4117 (1) © 2016 Magnolia Press
FIGURES 6–9. Agraecina scupiensis sp. nov., female paratype. 6. Habitus, dorsal view; 7. Habitus, ventral view; 8. Vulva, ventral
view; 9. Vulva, dorsal view. Scale bars: 6, 7—1 mm ; 8, 9—0.5 mm.
Zootaxa 4117 (1) © 2016 Magnolia Press · 139A NEW SPECIES OF BALKAN AGRAECINA SPIDER
FIGURES 10–13. Agraecina scupiensis sp. nov., male and female paratypes. 10. Male palp, ventral view; 11. Male palp, retrolateral
view; 12. Epigyne, ventral view; 13. Vulva, ventral view. Scale bars: 10, 11 – 0.4 mm; 12, 13 – 0.2 mm.
TABLE 2. Agraecina scupiensis sp. nov., leg measurements (female paratype).
Legs Femur Patella Tibia Metatarsus Tarsus Total
I 1.8 1.08 1.8 1.37 1.08 7.13
II 1.8 1.08 1.62 1.26 1.19 6.95
III 1.66 0.9 1.44 1.44 1.08 6.52
IV 2.16 1.08 1.94 2.45 1.19 8.82
DELTSHEV & WANG140 · Zootaxa 4117 (1) © 2016 Magnolia Press
Epigyne and vulva (Figs. 8, 9, 12, 13): with well-defined median septum, greatly narrowing posteriorly. Copulatory
openings wide, sperm ducts arcuate, spermathecae curved and oblique.
Distribution. Known only from the type series localities within the city of Skopje (Fig. 1).
Acknowledgements
We are much obliged to our colleague Dushitsa Stefanovska who provided us with spider material from Skopje, to
Robert Bosmans and Jan Bosselaers for the useful discussion and precise comments, and to Victor Fet for the linguistic
improvement of the text. This research was supported by grant from DFG (German Research Foundation).
References
Bosmans, R. (1999) The genera Agroeca, Agraecina, Apostenus and Scotina in the Maghreb countries (Araneae: Liocranidae).
Bulletin de l’Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Entomologie, 69, 25–34.
Bosselaers, J. (2009) Studies in Liocranidae (Araneae): redescriptions and transfers in Apostenus Westring and Brachyanillus Simon,
as well as description of a new genus. Zootaxa, 2141, 37–55.
Bosselaers, J. & Jocqué, R. (2002) Studies in Corinnidae: cladistic analysis of 38 corinnid and liocranid genera, and transfer of
Phrurolithinae. Zoologica Scripta, 31, 241–270.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1463-6409.2002.00080.x
Bosselaers, J. & Jocqué, R. (2013) Studies in Liocranidae (Araneae): a new afrotopical genus featuring a synapomorphy for the
Cybaeodinae. European Journal of Taxonomy, 40, 1–49.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2013.40
Simon, E. (1932) Les arachnides de France. Tome VI. Synopsis générale et catalogue des espèces françaises de l'ordre des Araneae.
4e partie. Roret, Paris, pp. 773–978.
Stefanovska, D., Naumova, M, Prelik, D., Deltshev, C. & Lazarov, S. (2008) Spiders from the Skopje Region. A faunistic and
zoogeographical analysis. Historia naturalis bulgarica, 19, 35–49.
The World Spider Catalog (2016) World Spider Catalog. Version 17.0. Natural History Museum Bern, Available from: http://
wsc.nmbe.ch (accessed January 2016)