2017 Emory Global Health Case Competition Competition · 2017 Emory Global Health Case Competition...
Transcript of 2017 Emory Global Health Case Competition Competition · 2017 Emory Global Health Case Competition...
1
Growing Pains: Palliative Care in Indonesia and
Papua New Guinea
The Emory Global Health Institute Student Advisory Committee Case Writing Team
Case Writers: Mwangala Akamandisa, Konya Badsa, Connor Fuchs, Clarissa Myers, Jessie Preslar
Faculty Advisers: Dr. Robert Bednarczyk and Dr. Deborah McFarland
All characters, organizations, and plots described within the case are fictional and bear no direct reflection to existing organizations or individuals. The case topic, however, is a true representation of circumstances in the
Papua New Guinea and Indonesia. The case scenario is complex and does not necessarily have a correct or perfect solution, and thus encourages a judicious balance of creative yet perceptive approaches.
The authors have provided informative facts and figures within the case and appendices to help teams. The data provided are derived from independent sources, may have been adapted for use in this case, and are
clearly cited such that teams can verify or contest the findings within their recommendations, if it is pertinent to do so. Teams are responsible for justifying the accuracy and validity of all data and calculations that are
used in their presentations, as well as defending their assertions in front of a panel of knowledgeable judges representing different stakeholders.
2017 Emory Global Health Case Competition
Competition
2
Ruth Somare, the Secretary of the National Department of Health in Papua New Guinea (PNG), had
seen her country’s health status improve greatly during her lifetime. She remembered hearing the
stories Lana Somare, her mother, told about the toll infectious diseases had on their family
members, including Lana’s own battle with tuberculosis during her childhood. These stories
prompted Ruth to pursue a career in medicine. After studying medicine in Indonesia, Ruth returned
to PNG to work as a physician. Her skills caught the attention of officials in the Department of
Health, leading to her current position.
Two years ago, Lana was diagnosed with terminal breast cancer. Since the diagnosis, she has been
in tremendous pain and has faced great difficulties finding hospice facilities and general pain
management relief, including reliable and safe sources of opioids. Even as Ruth reflected on the
great improvements in health care that have been made in PNG, Ruth remained deeply troubled by
the lack of available palliative care services in the country. Upon further investigation, Ruth
discovered that the scarcity of palliative care resources was a troubling trend not unique to PNG but
one that affected other countries in the region as well, including Indonesia. She expressed her
concerns to both her boss, the PNG Minister of Health, as well as the Minister of Health of Indonesia,
who was one of her medical school classmates. Moved by the gravity of the problem and the
passion with which Ruth spoke, both leaders made a commitment to make access to palliative care
a national priority.
As a world-renowned international consulting group on palliative care, you have been chosen to
respond to a request from the governments of Indonesia and PNG. The government leaders have
recognized the growing public health concern as millions of their citizens suffer from diseases
whose final stages can involve substantial pain, especially HIV and various types of cancer.
Each consulting group is tasked with developing an innovative palliative care program to address
this need. Choose one country, either Indonesia or PNG, to which your palliative care program will
be targeted, and appropriately justify your choice. Country leaders and public health officials have a
focused interest in improving accessibility of palliative care treatment to their citizens suffering
from chronic pain; your program does not need to be governmental policy, but it must demonstrate
active collaboration with current governmental entities and activities. Appropriate economic
considerations are required, as the health systems in these two countries are at a crossroads; they
are both in the accelerated transition phase of the GAVI support transition, due in part to
strengthening economies. Legal issues will also be central, particularly regulations of opioid
medications and considerations of the legality of physician assisted deaths. Furthermore, your plan
must encompass physical and emotional aspects of palliative care, while also considering the
religion and culture of the country for which it is developed. Attitudes surrounding death vary
vastly between cultures, and your program must demonstrate sensitivity towards your target
population and the variability within that population. Additionally, the appropriate use of opioids is
a key component to quality palliative care and related treatment, and thus opioid availability and
Introduction
Prompt
3
usage guidelines in Indonesia or PNG are important considerations. A panel that includes experts in
public health, chronic disease, and palliative care will judge your program.
Funding will be guaranteed for the first three years of your program, as promised by Basuki
Sutrisno, a celebrity that commonly donates to health care related charities, and each of the
governments. Each respective government has promised fifty percent of yearly funding, and this
will be matched by Mr. Sutrisno to reach the full funding level. If your team chooses to work in
Indonesia, you will be provided USD 10 million for each of the first two years and USD 5 million for the third year. If you choose to work in PNG, the amount will be scaled by the ratio of national
spending on health care, so you will receive USD 4 million the first two years and USD 2 million the
third year. The funding is only guaranteed for the first three years, so each consulting group must
include a plan for long-term sustainability and growth.
What is palliative care?
The World Health Organization (WHO) defines palliative care as “an approach that improves the
quality of life of patients and their families facing the problem associated with life-threatening
illness, through the prevention and relief of suffering by means of early identification and
impeccable assessment and treatment of pain and other problems, physical, psychosocial and
spiritual.”1 It is a form of care that is integrative, involving many different disciplines to address the
physical and mental needs of the patient.2 Somewhat unique among medical fields, palliative care
also has an explicit focus on support for the family of the patient in addition to care for the primary
patient. The United Nations (UN) recognizes palliative care as a human right, and opioid analgesics
are included on WHO’s list of essential medicines.3,4 The WHO estimates that approximately 40
million people need palliative care worldwide each year, and 78% of these are in low and middle
income countries.5
International status of palliative care
Worldwide, palliative care has had a unique place in many cultures. However, the ideal for end-of-
life care has taken a number of forms, often dependent on location-specific contextual factors.
Although a model based on hospice care has emerged in the United States and Europe, these
principles may not be acceptable everywhere. An open discussion around death with the patient, a
central part of hospice care, is not necessarily practiced in all cultures. Discussions of palliative care
can be complex and are heavily influenced by the belief systems of the patient, the patient’s
caregivers, and clinician.6 Furthermore, cultural and religious upbringing are central to an
individual’s belief system.6
Greater than 5.5 billion people (83% of world's population) in more than 150 countries have low to
no access to morphine and other narcotic medications. According to data from the International
Narcotics Control Board’s (INCB) 2015 Availability Report, more than 75% of the world’s
population has limited to no access to proper pain relief treatment for conditions including cancer,
HIV/AIDS, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, surgery, and injuries, among many other medical
Background on Palliative Care
4
conditions.4 Based on WHO and Worldwide Palliative Care Alliance (WPCA) estimates, 377 adults
per 100,000 will require palliative care at the end of life, but 18 million people still die in pain each
year.7,8
Opioid regulations and governing bodies
The UN 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs is a major governing treaty in the international
control of opioid analgesics. It recognizes that narcotic drugs are indispensable for the relief of pain
and suffering and that narcotic drugs should be made available for such medical purposes. The
INCB was established at the Convention to oversee compliance of the determined laws and
regulations, as well as monitoring implementation of international drug control conventions.9 In
addition to the INCB, the other governing bodies addressing opioid use include: the UN Commission
on Narcotic Drugs, which leads the international drug policy development; and the UN Office on
Drugs and Crime, whose responsibility is to coordinate global action related to drugs, crime, and
terrorism.10 Additionally, Millennium Development Goal Eight aimed, in part, to encourage access to
affordable, essential drugs in developing countries.11
Access to Opioids
Despite current regulations, “90% of the global consumption of morphine, fentanyl, and oxycodone
registered in 2009 occur[red] in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United States, and several
European countries.”12 This highlights the limitations of current regulations, as widespread availability of opioids in low and middle income countries remains poor. There are a variety of
factors contributing to low availability of opioids, including most notably a fragmented supply
chain; unfavorable political, clinical, and patient views towards the drugs; a fear of creating opioid
addiction and dependency; and a lack of sufficient health care system funds in many countries.13
The opioid supply chain is starkly different between developed and developing countries. In high-
income countries, the primary wholesale market is controlled by a few national firms, whereas
developing countries often have hundreds or thousands of firms controlling small shares of the
same market.14 This fragmented system often translates to higher costs, for all actors in the supply
chain including the consumer, and creates a market for cheaper drugs of questionable quality.14 The
availability of potentially low-quality drugs can have devastating consequences — treatment may
not be fully effective, there may be unknown side effects, or adverse events may occur because of
the low quality of the medication. The most inefficient and expensive component of the chain of
supply is the last leg, the distribution to the pharmacy.14
Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan (BPOM) is the primary governing body in control of distribution licensing of all prescription medications to be distributed in Indonesia.15 Further, large
pharmaceutical distributors control wholesale distribution of drugs, which requires special
licensing from the Director General of Pharmaceuticals and Medical Equipment (DGPM).15 In PNG,
the supply chain is made up of “a tiered structure of Area Medical Stores, provincial transit stores,
provincial hospitals and rural health services … using a ‘pull’ or demand system coordinated by the
Medical Supply Branch of the Ministry of Health.”16 There is no regular assessment, on any
government level, of pharmaceutical policy in PNG.
5
Potential for Opioid Misuse
Globally, there has been a lack of detailed reporting in regards to the use and misuse of opioids.
However, there has been a significant increase in sales of opioids over the years. Annual global sales
of Oxycontin, for example, soared from USD 48 million in 1996 to USD 2.8 billion in 2012.17 While
there is limited information on global use, there was a greater than 300% increase in opioid
prescriptions in the United States from 1991-2009. A dramatic spike in opioid production has
consequently led to high rates of prescription drug abuse; in 2011 alone, over 1.2 million
emergency visits in the US were due to unauthorized prescription drug use, and there are around
17,000 deaths per year due to prescription drug abuse.18 Officially declared a national epidemic by
the CDC, opioid abuse is a very serious public health issue in the United States.19
End of Life Decisions
Decisions surrounding end of life care can be difficult and emotional for patients, their families, and
health care providers. Physician assisted death, also known as assisted suicide, physician aid-in-
dying and patient administered hastened death, “refers to the practice where a physician provides a
potentially lethal medication to a terminally ill, suffering patient at his request that he can take (or
not) at a time of his own choosing to end his life.”20 There are individuals and groups that staunchly
oppose this practice in any case, while others believe that physician assisted death should be
allowed when the patient is a consenting, mentally competent adult. Cultural and religious beliefs
play a large role in shaping individuals’ positions on this issue. The legality of the practice varies
both between and within countries. Nonetheless, it is an issue that demands consideration when
designing a palliative care program.
Demographics, Economies, and Health
Indonesia and PNG provide two distinct historical and cultural contexts, where changing economies
and disease distributions have led to an increased need for palliative care. These countries do not
currently have robust palliative care infrastructure, although they both have many people who
would benefit from such services. Both countries have made economic gains in the past few
decades and are transitioning out of GAVI eligibility, complicating their current health care
budgets.21 The end of GAVI funding means they will need to commit increasing amounts of their
health care budget towards vaccines, which could affect the availability of funds for chronic
diseases and other conditions.
These two countries have a unique relationship, predominately due to their shared border on the
island of New Guinea (see Appendix A). The borders are porous and not entirely secure, and many
citizens enjoy frequent travel across the border. Their border history is also smattered with
conflict, from inappropriate military force to the stealing of vital resources such as food and medical
supplies.22 Despite these differences, Indonesia and PNG are close neighbors with many similarities
Background on Indonesia and Papua New Guinea (PNG)
6
in terms of economy and health care issues.
One source of financing for health care in Indonesia and PNG has come from international partners.
The Global Fund for HIV, Malaria, and TB is a partnership organization that provides financial
support in over 100 countries for the three diseases listed in its name. The Global Fund awards
funding based on a country's income level in a disease-specific manner. According to the Global
Fund, Indonesia currently has 51,000 people on antiretroviral therapy and, to date, has received a
total of USD 691 million of the USD 906 million for which it signed, with USD 237 million of the received total (of USD 292 million signed) allocated specifically to AIDS (see Appendix B).23 In
contrast, PNG has 21,000 people on antiretroviral therapy.23 To date, it has received USD 35 million
out of the USD 43 million earmarked for AIDS care and USD 197 million in total funding of the USD
230 million for which it signed.23 Both countries remain eligible for funding through the Global
Fund for HIV, TB and Malaria.24
Indonesia
Indonesia has the 5th largest population in the world, with an estimated 258 million inhabitants
(see Table 1).25 They also have the largest Muslim population in the world, with 88% of the
population practicing Islam.26 Demographically, they have a young population; twenty-five percent
of the populace is between the ages of 0-14 years old. This age structure is beginning to change
however, with a total fertility rate of 2.13 and a life expectancy of 70.1 years for males and 75.5 for
females. In Indonesia, total expenditure of health makes up 2.9% of the country’s USD 861 billion
GDP.
The current health care infrastructure and health care access in Indonesia is in a state of
development and transition; 2016 marks the second full year of Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional (JKN),
the country's universal health care system.27 As of November 2014, nearly 130 million Indonesians
had insurance, including middle-income level citizens who had previously been excluded from prior
forms of social health insurance due to their incomes.28 The new plan covers medical care, as well
as hospital stays and ambulance services. However, the system often leaves citizens with little
choice of provider or location of care. Additionally, Indonesia's geography consists roughly of
17,000 islands, 6,000 of which are inhabited; this immediately creates an added challenge to the
development of health care infrastructure and the provision of care.29 Citizens in remote, rural
areas of Indonesia often have difficulty accessing the care they need, unless they are able to afford
travel to another island with sufficient health care resources. Furthermore, there is an overall lack
of providers relative to Indonesia's population. The doctor-to-patient ratio is 0.2 per 1,000 patients,
which is one of the lowest in Southeast Asia and puts it among the 44% of WHO Member States that have less than one physician per 1,000 patients.30
PNG
PNG is a smaller country, with a population of 6.8 million people.31 The populace is 96% Christian,
although some indigenous practices are still practiced widely.32 The age distribution is skewed even
more heavily towards a younger demographic than Indonesia, with 34% of the population between
0-14 years old and a total fertility rate of 3.1.31 Despite this, there are still almost 650,000
inhabitants over the age of 55, and the average life expectancy is 65 for men and 69.5 for
7
women.31 PNG’s total health expenditure is 4.3% of their USD 17 billion GDP.33
PNG has its own challenges pertaining to health care delivery, availability, and existing
infrastructure. The PNG topography is diverse, with mountains and deep valleys that create
geographical divides. This has led to a variety of indigenous peoples living throughout the country
who may not have easy access to their current health infrastructure.34 Rising incomes have led to a
shift toward Western lifestyles followed by a shift in the disease burden towards chronic
conditions, including various types of cancer.34 The PNG National Health plan focuses on providing care for poor and rural populations, with clearly defined goals, such as Vision 2050 — to be among
the top 50 countries in the UN Development Program's human development index by 2050.35 Their
health policy has also defined minimum standards for general health facility infrastructure and
staffing, as well as standard equipment lists. The health plan in PNG focuses on decentralization,
and provision of care at province, district, and local levels, in addition to a nationally-run referral
hospital.34 However, there is still a shortage in the number of hospitals, both publically and
privately operated. Churches play an important role in the delivery of health care services,
operating 46% of health centers in the country, primarily in rural areas.34
Table 1: Demographics and Economies25,26,30,31,32,33,34
Indonesia Papua New Guinea
Population 258 million 6.8 million
Population Under 15 25% 34%
Population Over 65 5.17% 3.05%
Fertility
(children born/woman)
2.13 3.1
Life Expectancy Female: 75.5
Male: 70.1
Female: 69.5
Male: 65
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) USD 861 billion USD 17 billion
Health Expenditure (% GDP) 2.9 4.3
Physicians Per 1000 People 0.20 (2012) 0.06 (2010)
Main Religion 88% Muslim 96% Christian
8
Cancer and HIV are two of many conditions that can lead to the need for long-term medical
management, including the provision of palliative care.
Cancer
Historically, international aid money has targeted infectious diseases; however, the prevalence of
chronic conditions has increased in many developing countries as people live longer and lifestyles
shift. The worldwide risk of dying from cancer by the age of 75 is 10.5%, with both Indonesia and Papua New Guinea having comparable risks.36 In both countries, the five-year prevalence for
females is higher than the corresponding figure for males (Table 2). The most frequent cancers in
Indonesia, as of 2012, were breast, lung, and colorectal; PNG’s leading cancers are lip, oral cavity,
and cervix uteri (see Appendix B).37,38
Table 2: Cancer Epidemiology36,39,40
Indonesia Papua New Guinea
Risk of dying from cancer by age
75 (world average is 10.5%)
9.7% 13.3%
5-year prevalence (per 100,000) 357.7 385.5
Sex specific 5-year prevalence Female: 449.8
Male: 263.6
Female: 544.7
Male: 228.9
HIV/AIDS
Although HIV treatment has been heavily funded, programs have focused primarily on providing
antiretroviral therapy to patients. Less attention has been paid to those living with HIV, and the additional problems they may have beyond combatting the virus. PNG and Indonesia both have a
relatively low prevalence of HIV, although this translates to a large number of people in need of
care due to their large populations. According to 2015 UNAIDS estimates, the prevalence of HIV
among adults aged 15 to 49 in PNG is 0.8% compared to 0.5% in Indonesia.41,42
Cancer and HIV Epidemiology
9
Indonesia
The focus of health care in Indonesia is shifting towards non-communicable diseases, especially as
the country's population continues to age. Indonesia has 12,500,000 adults over 65, and this
number is expected to increase 7-14% by 2050, per the World Bank's estimates.43 Expansive
growth of infrastructure will be required to support the aging population as their disease burden
for certain age-related conditions increases, including palliative care services for those living with
terminal diseases. To distinguish infrastructure available in different countries, Lynch and
colleagues designated six different levels of palliative care service categories.44 Level 1, the lowest
level, has no known hospice-palliative care activity. The highest level, 4b, requires advanced
integration where palliative care services are well established and utilized within the health care
system. Indonesia has most recently been classified as level 3a: isolated palliative care that is not
fully integrated into mainstream health care services.
A palliative care plan was established in 1990 when three hospitals were appointed to evaluate the
use of oral morphine as pain relief. Since then, public, private, and faith-based organizations have
come to the table to join in efforts to improve palliative care.45 There are plans to open more than
ten new hospitals by 2017, reaching those previously unable to access care due to location and cost.
Further plans include development of a 500-bed palliative care center focusing on pain relief and
management of terminal, chronic conditions, as well as a 100-bed cancer hospital.28 Three doctors
in West Jakarta are being chosen specifically to receive palliative care training. It is hoped that this
will encourage continuous growth of infrastructure and practitioners available to provide palliative
care. Another form of existing Indonesian infrastructure related to palliative care is Rachel's House, a non-profit organization that provides palliative care to children living with cancer or HIV.46 The
organization provides home-based palliative care free of charge. The government and health
officials have clearly recognized the country's need for palliative care and are attempting to create
solutions for these problems, in the form of outpatient services, increasing accessibility to opioid
medications, and an overall increase and improvement in quality palliative care treatment.
Despite this history, access to palliative care is still limited, with only 7 cities on the 3 major islands
having any palliative care infrastructure in place.47 In addition to a lack of providers, limited
knowledge of palliative care practices by general health care providers has also been a major
barrier in cancer management, as well as limited use of opioids for pain management in palliative
care treatment. Infrastructure is lacking, and needs to be addressed before improvement in
palliative care treatment can occur throughout Indonesia.
Papua New Guinea
In PNG, infrastructure for palliative care has been non-existent. Despite the approximately 10,000
people that die annually from cancer, only recently have plans for a new palliative care facility, the
first of its kind, been announced with funding from the Australian government.48 With some
activity related to palliative care but no current provision, PNG is rated as a level 2 country by
Lynch and colleagues in their tiered designation.44 The 2014 revision of the national drug policy
recognized the poor distribution of medications and an inability to maintain them in rural areas due
Palliative Care in Indonesia and PNG
10
to a lack of trained pharmacists. All of these factors highlight a large gap in health care
infrastructure for palliative care in PNG, as well as the opportunity to have a large impact if these
needs are addressed.
1. World Health Organization. (2016). WHO Definition of Palliative Care. Retrieved from
http://www.who.int/cancer/palliative/definition/en/
2. Singer, P. A., & Bowman, K. W. (2002). Quality end-of-life care: A global perspective. BMC
Palliative Care, 1(1), 4. http://doi.org/10.1186/1472-684X-1-4
3. UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. (2000). General Comment No. 14: The
Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health (E/C.12/2000/4). Available at:
http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=E%2fC.12
%2f2000%2f4&Lang=en
4. International Narcotics Control Board (2016). Availability of Internationally Controlled Drugs:
Ensuring Adequate Access for Medical and Scientific Purposes. Retrieved from
http://www.incb.org/incb/en/documents/Publications/AnnualReports/AR2015/availability_2
015.html
5. WHO. (2015). Fact sheet N°402. Available at:
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs402/en/
6. Steinberg, S. (2011). Cultural and religious aspects of palliative care. International Journal of
Critical Illness and Injury Science, 1(2), 154. doi:10.4103/2229-5151.84804 7. Luke. (2015). Worldwide Hospice Palliative Care Alliance. About us. Retrieved December 15,
2016, from http://thewhpca.org/about-us-3
8. World Palliative Care Alliance; WHO. (2014). Global atlas of palliative care at the end of life.
Retrieved January 24, 2017 from http://www.who.int/ncds/management/palliative-
care/palliative-care-atlas/en/
9. Draft Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases 2013-2020.
(May 6, 2013). Retrieved on October 28, 2016 from
http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA66/A66_9-en.pdf
10. Access to Opioid Analgesics. (n.d). Retrieved on October 23, 2016 from
http://www.mccabecentre.org/focus-areas/access-to-opioid-analgesics-2
11. United Nations Millennium Development Goals. (n.d.). Retrieved January 26, 2017, from
http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/global.shtml
12. United Nations Office on drugs and Crime (UNODC) (2011). Ensuring availability of controlled
medications for the relief of pain and preventing diversion and abuse: Striking the right balance
to achieve the optimal public health outcome. New York: United Nations.
13. Manijani, D., Paul, D.B., Kunnumpurath, S., Kaye, A.D., and Vadivelu, N. (2014). Availability and
utilization of opioids for pain management: global issues. The Ochsner Journal, 14(2).
14. Committee on Understanding the Global Public Health Implications of Substandard, Falsified,
and Counterfeit Medical Products; Board on Global Health; Institute of Medicine; Buckley GJ,
Gostin LO, editors. Countering the Problem of Falsified and Substandard Drugs. Washington
(DC): National Academies Press (US); 2013 May 20. 5, Weaknesses in the Drug Distribution
References
11
Chain. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK202523/
15. Budiarti, E., Sirie, I. (2015). Distribution and marketing of drugs in Indonesia: overview.
Retrieved January 29, 2017 from http://uk.practicallaw.com/2-618-5567#null
16. Brown, A. N., & Gilbert, B. (2014). The Papua New Guinea medical supply system - documenting
opportunities and challenges to meet the Millennium Development Goals. Journal of
Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice, 7(1), 5. doi:10.1186/2052-3211-7-5
17. Lyapustina, T., & Alexander, G. C. (2015). The prescription opioid addiction and abuse epidemic:
how it happened and what we can do about it. The Pharmaceutical Journal, 294. doi:
10.1211/PJ.2015.20068579
18. Center for Lawful Access and Abuse Deterrence. (n.d). Prescription Drug Abuse Statistics.
Retrieved January 23, 2017, from http://claad.org/rx-drug-abuse-stats/
19. America’s Addiction to Opioids: Heroin and Prescription Drug Abuse: Hearing before the Senate
Caucus on International Narcotics Control, 113th Cong. (2016) (Testimony of Nora Volkow).
20. Quill, T., & Sussman, B. (n.d.). Physician Assisted Death. Retrieved January 19, 2017, from
http://www.thehastingscenter.org/briefingbook/physician-assisted-death/#
21. GAVI. (n.d). Country hub. Retrieved January 23, 2017, from http://www.gavi.org/country/
22. Blades, J. (2015, December 21). Line Between PNG and Indonesia Increasingly Blurred.
Retrieved from http://www.radionz.co.nz/international/pacific-news/292667/line-between-
png-and-indonesia-increasingly-blurred.
23. The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria. (n.d). Funding Model: Allocations. Retrieved January 24, 2017 from
http://www.theglobalfund.org/en/fundingmodel/process/allocations/
24. The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria. (n.d). Funding Model: Eligibility and
Transitions. Retrieved January 30, 2017 from
http://www.theglobalfund.org/en/fundingmodel/process/eligibility/
25. The World Factbook: Indonesia. (n.d). Retrieved January 30, 2017 from
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/id.html
26. Pew Research Center. (2010). Muslim population of Indonesia. Retrieved from
http://www.pewforum.org/2010/11/04/muslim-population-of-indonesia/
27. Indonesia’s Universal Healthcare. (n.d). Retrieved on January 8, 2016 from
http://jakartaglobe.id/health/indonesias-universal-healthcare-will-it-work/
28. Oxford Business Group. (2016). Universal Coverage, Liberalisation and Innovation Stimulate
Health Care Sector Growth in Indonesia. Retrieved from
https://www.oxfordbusinessgroup.com/overview/high-hopes-universal-coverage-
liberalisation-and-innovation-stimulate-sector-growth
29. Indonesian Ministry of Trade. (n.d). May of Indonesia. Retrieved from
http://www.embassyofindonesia.org/wordpress/?page_id=494
30. Global Health Observatory (GHO) Data. (n.d.). Density of physicians (total number per 1000
population, latest available year). Retrieved from
http://www.who.int/gho/health_workforce/physicians_density/en/
31. The World Factbook: Papua New Guinea. (n.d). Retrieved January 30, 2017 from
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/pp.html
32. U.S. Department of State. (2007). Papua New Guinea: International religious freedom report
2007. Retrieved from http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/irf/2007/90150.htm
33. Papua New Guinea. (n.d). Retrieved from http://www.who.int/countries/png/en/
34. PNG Department of Treasury. (2009). Papua New Guinea Vision 2050. Retrieved December 15,
12
2016, from
http://www.treasury.gov.pg/html/publications/files/pub_files/2011/2011.png.vision.2050.pd
f
35. PNG uses PPP’s to improve health care delivery. (n.d.). Retrieved from
https://www.oxfordbusinessgroup.com/overview/png-uses-ppps-improve-health-care-
delivery
36. Fact Sheets by Population-World. (n.d.). Retrieved November 21, 2016, from
http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_population.aspx
37. World Health Organization. (2014). Cancer Country Profiles, 2014: Indonesia. Retrieved from
http://www.who.int/cancer/country-profiles/idn_en.pdf
38. World Health Organization. (2014). Cancer Country Profiles, 2014: Papua New Guinea.
Retrieved from http://apps.who.int/cancer/country-profiles/png_en.pdf
39. Fact Sheets by Population-Papua New Guinea. (n.d.). Retrieved November 21, 2016, from
http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_population.aspx
40. Fact Sheets by Population-Indonesia. (n.d.). Retrieved November 21, 2016, from
http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_population.aspx
41. Indonesia. (n.d.). Retrieved November 21, 2016, from
http://www.unaids.org/en/regionscountries/countries/indonesia
42. Papua New Guinea (n.d.). Retrieved November 21, 2016, from
http://www.unaids.org/en/regionscountries/countries/papuanewguinea 43. The World Bank: Indonesia. (n.d). Retrieved January 30, 2017 from
http://data.worldbank.org/country/indonesia
44. Lynch, T., Connor, S., & Clark, D. (2013). Mapping Levels of Palliative Care Development: A
Global Update. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 45(6), 1094–1106.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.05.011
45. Rochmawati, E., Wiechula, R., & Cameron, K. (2016). Current status of palliative care services in
Indonesia: a literature review. International Nursing Review, 63(2), 180–190.
http://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12236
46. Rachel House: Who We Are. (n.d). Retrieved January 24, 2017 from https://rachel-
house.org/about-us/who-we-are/
47. Wardhani, D. A. (2015, January 21). Jakarta to build cancer hospital, develop palliative care. The
Jakarta Post. Retrieved from http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2015/01/21/jakarta-
build-cancer-hospital-develop-palliative-care.html
48. Incentive Fund. (2016, October 2016). First-of-its-kind health facility to open in PNG. Retrieved
from http://incentivefund.org/news/first-grant-recipients-announced
13
Appendix A. Map of Indonesia and Papau New Guinea
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Indonesia_Papua_New_Guinea_Locator.svg
Appendices
14
Appendix B. The Global Fund Statistics
Indonesia Papua New Guinea Total Funding Allocated (all three diseases)
US$691,552,779 US$230,306,739
AIDS Funding received US$237,483,191 US$35,362,874 AIDS Funding allocated US$43,967,123 Number of people on antiretroviral therapy
41000 21000
Antiretroviral therapy retention rate
67% N/A
Appendix C. Cancer Incidence
Indonesia
PNG
15
The Emory Global Health Case Competition Leadership Team gratefully acknowledges the dedication and contributions of each of the Writing Team members. Writing Team and Emory University Affiliations: Jessie Preslar, Emory University School of Medicine/Rollins School of Public Health (Chair) Mwangala Akamandisa, Laney Graduate School Konya Badsa, Emory College Connor Fuchs, Emory School of Law/Rollins School of Public Health Clarissa Myers, Rollins School of Public Health Dr. Robert Bednarczyk, Rollins School of Public Health (Faculty Advisor) Dr. Deborah McFarland, Rollins School of Public Health (Faculty Advisor) The Case Writing Team also recognizes valuable inputs and expert reviews from Drs. Jeffrey Koplan and Robert Breiman. The Emory Global Health Case Competition Leadership Team gratefully acknowledges the logistics and planning team, with special thanks to: Rebecca Baggett, Kelsey Patel, Jessie Preslar, and Karla Umana.
Acknowledgements