2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Smith

8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Smith

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-2011-campus-improvement-plan-smith 1/33

2010 - 2011

Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD Campus Improvement Plan 2010 - 2011

CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD

NEWMAN SMITH HIGH SCHOOL

CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN2010 - 2011

Principal: Joe Weldin Pouncy

School Vision: Student learning and achievement…All learners will take a curriculum of rigor that includes Advanced Placement and Dual Credit courses prior to graduation. Learners will meet State Standard at proficient or above, meet standards (3 or above) on Advanced Placement examinations; score above

national norms on SAT, ACT, and on other standardized instruments.Students will graduate in four years with college credit, ready for admission to competitive post-secondary degree programs without remediation.

October 1, 2010



2010 - 2011

Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD Campus Improvement Plan 2010 - 2011 2

CIC MEMBERS

Name Position Years Served Signature

Lisa Donlan Teacher/CIC Chair 2Shea Needham Teacher 2

Sheu-Fen Lee Teacher 1

Katie Henderson Teacher 1

Chad Hunter Teacher 1

Terry Smith Teacher 1

Laura De Lemos Teacher 2

Brian Shafer Teacher 1

Jenna Walden Student 2

Rane Renshaw Student 1

Jordan Lockett Student 1

Kirk Manley Associate Principal

Joe W. Pouncy Principal



2010 - 2011


NEEDS ASSESSMENTFrom LifeTrack Services, Inc.

Senior Exit Survey, Class of 2010

Percentage of Students Answering Yes to the Following Questions

Werecounselorshelpful inselection of apath to followaftergraduation?

Didcounselorsguide you in acourse ofstudy basedon yourabilities anddesires?

Did counselorsprovideinformation aboutfinancial aide andscholarships?

Did you haveenoughopportunities todiscuss schooland academicconcerns withyour counselor?

Do you feel fullyprepared for thetransition tocollege or theworkplace?

Did NSHS provide anacademically challengingcurriculum?

2009 80.3% 70.1% 80.3% 79.2% 81.6%

2010 79.6% 68.6% 80.5% 79.3% 82.3% 88.02%

NEEDS ASSESSMENTFrom LifeTrack Services, Inc.

Senior Exit Survey, Class of 2010Percentage of Students Answering AVERAGE (or higher) to the Following Questions

How would yourate thecomprehensivelearningexperienceoffered at NSHS?

Teachers heldhigh standardsand demandedquality work.

Newman SmithHS provided asafeenvironment.

Newman Smith HSprovided a drug freeenvironment.

Newman Smith HStaught you to thinkcritically, read criticallyand to problem solve

The staff of NewmanSmith HS cared aboutyou.

2009 96.2% 93.6% 81.7% 85.2%2010 97.0% 95.8% 93.4% 79.04% 94.0% 86.5%



2010 - 2011


CAMPUS PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES

Chart of Expectations

RATES OF SUCCESS

2007 2008 2009 2010*

Graduation Rate 92.9% 93.6% 93.4% 95.0%

Completion Rate I 97.1% 96.3% 97.2% 98.0%* Projected

ACT

2009Tests Taken – 133


2011Tests Taken* - 140

Composite (all areas) 20.3 21.7 25.0

English 19.2 20.9 25.0

Mathematics 21.1 22.0 25.0

Reading 19.9 21.5 25.0

Science 20.7 21.8 25.0

* Projected

SAT


2010Tests Taken - 222

2011Tests Taken* - 250

Verbal/Critical Reasoning 502 506 520*Math 538 527 545*Writing 502 502 520*Combined 1542 1535 1585*

* Projected



2010 - 2011


2010 TAKS, PARTICIPATION, & ATTENDANCE DATA (Percentage)- without TPM

2011 GOALS

All Students African American Hispanic White Special EdEconomicallyDisadvantaged

LEP

INDICATOR2010 Goal 2010 Goal 2010 Goal 2010 Goal 2010 Goal 2010 Goal 2010 Goal

Reading/English Language Arts 91 96 90 96 89 96 97 99 66 92 88 96 59 90

Mathematics 80 92 72 92 74 92 93 95 37 92 74 92 48 90

Science 88 92 79 92 83 92 96 98 50 92 81 92 59 90

Social Studies 97 98 94 98 97 98 >99 99 83 92 96 96 92 90

Graduation 2009 93.4 83.6 93.1 96.6 80.6 89.1 78.6

Graduation 2010 96 96 96 98 96 96 96

Participation: Reading/Language Arts >99 >99 >99 >99 >99 >99 >99 >99 >99 >99 >99 >99 >99 >99

Participation: Math >99 >99 >99 >99 >99 >99 >99 >99 >99 >99 >99 >99 >99 >99

Attendance 95.3 98



2010 - 2011


High SchoolCampus Goals

2010 Percentage of Commended Students- without TPM

2011 Goals

All Students African American Hispanic White

INDICATORCamp

us

State+

-

GoalCamp

us

State+

-

GoalCamp

us

State+

-

GoalCamp

us

State+

-

Goal

Reading/English

Language Arts22 19 +3 60 13 13 0 60 16 14 +2 60 37 27 +10 60

Mathematics 21 22 -1 60 11 10 +1 60 13 15 -2 60 38 32 +6 60

Science 23 17 +5 60 10 8 +2 60 11 10 +1 60 39 27 +12 60

Social Studies 54 48 +6 60 37 34 +3 60 41 38 +4 60 77 61 +16 80

Special Ed. Economically Disadvantaged LEP

INDICATORCamp

usState

+

-Goal

Camp

usState

+

-Goal

Camp

usState

+

-Goal

Reading/English

Language Arts1 3 -2 7 14 13 +1 20 1 2 -1 20

Mathematics 4 3 +1 8 12 13 -1 20 5 5 0 20

Science 6 3 +3 8 13 9 +4 20 2 2 0 20

Social Studies 21 14 +7 25 39 35 +4 45 17 10 +7 25



2010 - 2011


The Goal of C-FB ISD is high achievement for all students.

Supporting Objective 1: Continuously increase student achievementA. TEA Recognized/Exemplary District

B. Recognized/Exemplary SchoolsC. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

D. Achievement Gap

E. Special Populations

F. TAKS Commended Scores (all students)G. Higher Education Readiness Component (TSI) (EXIT Scores)

H. SAT

I. PSAT/NMSQTJ. Advanced Placement

K. Graduation Data

Supporting Objective 2: Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff A. Out of School Suspensions

B. DAEP Placements

C. Attendance Rate

Supporting Objective 3: Continuously increase operational effectivenessA. Financial Integrity Rating System in Texas (School FIRST)B. Increase percentage of operating expenditures expended for instruction

C. Fund balance as a percentage of the total expenditure budget excluding TIF and Chapter 41 payments

D. Kilowatt hour per sq. ft. usageE. Overtime hours

F. Highly Qualified Teachers

G. Teacher Classroom Attendance RateH. All Staff Attendance Rate

I. Teacher Turnover RateJ. Availability of Critical Technology Systems

Supporting Objective 4: Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school systemA. Parent Survey - Achieving Quality TogetherB. Stakeholder Survey (to be developed)

C. Staff Survey (to be developed)



2010 - 2011


Newman Smith High School2010-11 Campus Focus

District Supporting Objective #1: Continuously increase student achievement

Campus Focus # 1 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureELA-Increase the Short Answer Responses of Score Point 3 and 4 to 80% C, DELA- Increase the Written Composition Scores Point 3 and 4 to 90% C, DMathematics-Qualifying student groups will have a passing rate of >92% C, DScience- Qualifying student groups will have a passing rate of >92% D

Social Studies-Average Percent Correct in all objective will be >92% DCommended Performance – student groups will have achieve >60% on all tests F

Improve student achievement

TAKS Exit Level Assessment (All Students)– Increase the Passed All TestsTaken to >94%

B

Campus Focus #2 Criteria for Success Performance Measure

Attendance rate of >98% CParticipation of >95% on AYP Assessments CCompletion Rate I of >98% CGraduation Rate >94% K

Graduation RateCompletion RateADA Attendance

Failure Rate – Decrease the number of students failing 1+ course by 5% E

Campus Focus #3 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureGAN will be established for the campus and integrated into 100% of curriculums

D, G

Core Department GAN will be developed and implemented by 100% of departmental staff.

D, G

Professional Development GAN (by subject) will be developed andimplemented by 100% of course staff.

D, G

Curriculum Objectives



2010 - 2011


Campus Focus #4 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureNumber of students taking an Advanced Placement test will increase by 25% KNumber of Pre AP students in 2010-2011 that will enroll in an AP class for

2011-2012 will increase by 25%.

K

Students scoring 3, 4, or 5 on AP exams will increase by 20%. KStudents graduating on the Distinguished Achievement Program (DAP) will be10%

K

Students graduation on the Recommended High School Plan will be >90% K

Advanced AcademicEnrollment

Percentage of senior class enrolled in at least one AP class will be >60% K

Campus Focus #5 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureOverall Mean SAT Mathematics score will be > 545 HOverall Mean SAT Verbal/Critical Reading score will be > 520 HOverall Mean SAT Writing score will be> 520 HAverage ACT English score will be >24 H

Average ACT Mathematics score will be >25 HAverage ACT Reading score will be >25 HAverage ACT Science score will be >25 HAverage ACT Composite score will be > 25 HTexas Success Initiative (TSI) for ELA will be > 80% GIncrease College Enrollment by >10% CIncrease Students Graduating With College Credit by >15% C

Increase Campus Library Book Checkout by >20% C

College Readiness

Texas Success Initiative (TSI) for Mathematics will be > 80% G



2010 - 2011


Campus Focus #6 Criteria for Success Performance Measure

Proficient standard for Domain 8 of the PDAS will be meet by 100% of theNSHS teaching facultyAll (100%) of the designated Pre AP and AP teachers will meet gifted trainingcriteria for an exemplary program

J

All (100%) of the teachers will be HQ (highly qualified) in their teaching area Obj. 3 – FAll (100%) of the Advanced Placement teachers will be have College Boardapproved curriculums (AP Course Audit)

J

Professional Development



2010 - 2011


Newman Smith High School

2010-11 Campus Focus

District Supporting Objective #2: Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff

Campus Focus #7 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureAttendance rate of >98% C

Reduce Campus Tardies to <1% per Period C

Attendance Rate

Campus Focus #8 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureCritical Reading (Content Literacy) D, J,KWritingStudent Note-taking

D, J,K

Student Feedback J,K

High Leverage StrategiesTo Improve Achievement

SAT Writing/Grammar J,K



2010 - 2011



District Supporting Objective #3: Continuously increase operational effectiveness

Campus Focus #9 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureAll (100%) of the teachers will be HQ (highly qualified) in their teaching area FAttract and retain highly qualified teacher (hire only certified, well trainedteachers)

I

Percentage of teaching faculty with graduate degrees >15% F

NSHS Teaching Faculty



2010 - 2011



District Supporting Objective #4: Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school system

Campus Focus #10 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureTrain parents regarding programs that enhance student safety (Campuslockdown procedures, Student anti-drinking/driving programs, programs thateducate teenagers regarding Date Rape-Hazing-bullying.

A B

Improve the Algebra/Geometry skills of parents via our “Parents InEducation Program.” The goal of PIE is to enhance student achievement,student math scores, via parents being able to tutor their students daily inmathematics.

A B

Monthly Parent Coffees with Principal…The goal of this program is toprovide stakeholders a forum to informally acquire current informationregarding all phases of campus operations. Parents can ask questions or

discuss program and receive information regarding important dates andevents during the academic year. Additionally, Parents receive informationregarding how the campus utilizes its $83,000 in Title Funds.

A B

Principal’s PTSA Presentation: Each year the principal will make apresentation on a topic of interest to the PTSA membership. Topics rangefrom the Campus Improvement Plan, Title I program, Campus Vision/MissionStatement, and Clubs/organizations at Newman Smith.

A B

Counselors ‘ presentation: Each year Newman Smith counselors will make a

presentation to PTSA members regarding the college enrollment process. Thisis vital information for parents of college bound students.

A B

Parental Involvement



2010 - 2011


School GAN Results 2010 - 2011

GAN #1

GAN #2

Science

Motion, Forces,and Energy

Hispanic

Subject GAN Standards or Skills GAN

Sub-group/DisaggregationGAN

African. Am.

Econ. Dis.Interdependenceof Organisms

Mathematics

Measurement

Hispanic

Subject GAN Standards or Skills GAN

Sub-group/DisaggregationGAN

African Am.



2010 - 2011


NSHS Science GAN I

Demonstrates masteryat 90% or above.

Demonstrates mastery

at 90% or above.


at 90% or above.


at 90% or above.



at 90% or above.

By 2011, 92%of our students

will meet orexceed the

state standardin science

TAKS objective3 at grade level

4 C Compare thestructures andfunctions of virusesto cells and describe

the role of viruses incausing diseases.

9 D Analyze the flowof matter and energythrough differenttrophic levels and

between organismsand the physicalenvironment.

12 E Investigate andexplain theinteractions in an

ecosystem includingfood chains, food webs and foodpyramids.

Common quizzes in SATstyle questions. DistrictUnit Exams

AWAREEduphoria


AWAREEduphoria


AWAREEduphoria

Econ. Dis.MathematicalProcesses and

Tools

SMARTGOAL

INDICATOR MEASURE TARGET



2010 - 2011


NSHS Science GAN II

SMARTGOAL




2010 - 2011



at 90% or above.


at 90% or above.


at 90% or above.



at 90% or above.


at 90% or above.

By 2011, 92%of our students

will meet orexceed the

state standard

in scienceTAKS objective5 at grade level

9.5 (A) Demonstratewave types and theircharacteristics througha variety of activitiessuch as modeling withropes and coils,activating tuning forks,and interpreting dataon seismic waves.

9.5 (B) Demonstratewave interactionsincluding

interference,polarization,reflection,andresonance withinmaterials.

9.6 (A) Describe thelaw of conservation

of energy.

Common assessments

Laboratory activities

AWAREEduphoria data

Common assessments


AWAREEduphoria data

Common assessments


AWAREEduphoria data



2010 - 2011


NSHS Science% of students that Met Standard

ALL STUDENTS HISPANIC

CurrentData

Year Target CurrentData

Year Target

10 70 2008 85 10 56 2008 8511 87 11 7910 76 2009 90 10 65 2009 90

11 89 11 8210 80 2010 92 10 73 2010 9211 95 11 93

AFRICAN AMERICAN ECON. DISADVANTAGED

CurrentData


Year Target

10 57 2008 85 10 56 2008 8511 75 11 77

10 67 2009 90 10 61 2009 9011 83 11 8310 69 2010 92 10 70 2010 9211 91 11 92



2010 - 2011


S.M.A.R.T GOAL – MATHEMATICSNEWMAN SMITH HIGH SCHOOL

SMART

GOALGoal

should beStrategic

andspecific

MeasurableAttainableResults-based

and Time-bound

INDICATOR

Standardsand

Objectives

MEASURES

Tools we’ll

use todetermine

wherestudents are

now andwhether

they areimproving

TARGETS

Theattainable

performancelevel we

would like tosee

85% of allstudentsand 85%

ofstudents

in allsubgroupswill meetor exceed

thestandard

forPassingTAKSMath

Objective8

Measurement

PreviousTAKS

Results

85% of AllStudents

answering70% of TAKS

QuestionsCorrectly

AND

85% of eachsubpopulation

Answering70% of TAKSquestionscorrectly



2010 - 2011


NSHS MathematicsObjective 8 – Measurement and Similarities

Average % CorrectALL STUDENTS HISPANIC

CurrentData


Year Target

9 61 9 5610 63 2008 75 10 56 2008 75

11 70 11 659 59 9 5410 68 2009 80 10 63 2009 8011 73 11 699 55 9 5310 66 2010 90 10 61 2010 9011 71 11 65


CurrentData


Year Target

9 52 9 5410 56 2008 75 10 54 2008 75

11 53 11 639 50 9 5210 55 2009 80 10 63 2009 8011 63 11 709 47 9 5110 57 2010 90 10 59 2010 9011 63 11 66



2010 - 2011


NSHS MathematicsObjective 10 – Mathematical Processes and Tools

Average % Correct


CurrentData


Year Target

9 67 9 6110 71 2008 75 10 65 2008 7511 69 11 61

9 64 9 5910 71 2009 80 10 67 2009 8011 72 11 679 63 9 6110 66 2010 90 10 62 2010 9011 68 11 63


CurrentData


Year Target

9 60 9 5910 64 2008 75 10 64 2008 7511 58 11 61

9 58 9 5910 59 2009 80 10 67 2009 8011 63 11 719 57 9 6010 55 2010 90 10 59 2010 9011 58 11 61



2010 - 2011


NSHS Mathematics% of Students That Met Standard


CurrentData


Year Target

9 70 9 6310 71 2008 75 10 60 2008 7511 84 11 749 63 9 5310 74 2009 80 10 65 2009 80

11 85 11 789 72 9 6710 77 2010 92 10 71 2010 9211 91 11 85


CurrentData


Year Target

9 54 9 5910 62 2008 75 10 58 2008 7511 66 11 719 49 9 5210 52 2009 80 10 64 2009 80

11 77 11 829 63 9 6810 65 2010 92 10 69 2010 9211 83 11 86



2010 - 2011


2010 – 2011SMART Goal – EnglishNewman Smith High School


SMART

GOAL

By 2011, 90% ofall NSHS students

will meet orexceed theproficiencystandard on TAKSReading, ELA orExit Level ELA

By 2011, 80% ofthe WrittenCompositionscores will be 3’s

Objective 3: Analyzeand Critically evaluateculturally diverse texts

District ELA Checkpoints

District Tests (Exams) By 2011, % targeted for all subpops on Objective 3 willincrease to 90% (average %correct)

TAKS

By 2011, 80% of all NSHSstudents will score a 3 or 4on the TAKS WrittenComposition

District Writing

Assessments(Pearson)

TAKS

Objectives 4 and 5:Written Composition(Purpose andConventions)



2010 - 2011


NSHS Social Studies 2010-2011

SMARTGOAL


Social Studiesachieved 98%passing rate onthe 2010 TAKS.

Our goal is toincrease from76% itemscorrectto 83% itemscorrect onObjective 1

Objective 1-Issues andEvents in U.S. History.SE’s- Identify majoreras from 1877 to thepresent and describetheir definingcharacteristics.Explain thesignificance of thefollowing dates 1898,1914-19,1929,1941-45

Objective 4-Political Influencesin History

SE’s Evaluate theimpact ofprogressive erareforms includingInitiative, recall,referendum andthe passage of the16th and 17th amendments.Evaluate the

impact of reformleaders such asSusan B. Anthony,W.E. DuBois andRobertLaFollete onAmerican society.

District BenchmarksCommonAssessments

District Benchmarks

Common AssessmentsPractice Questions on SDriveFoor/Bearden FolderDaily Focus QuestionsOn line practice testsJeopardy GamesDocument Based EssayQuestions

TELEPAS EssaysLearning Tool Evaluations

Low performing students upto 80% of items correctGoal-83% of items correct inObj. 1

Low performing students upto 80% of items correctGoal-83% of items correct on

Obj. 1

Low performing students upto 80% of items correctGoal- 88% of items correct inObj. 4

Low performing students upto 80% of items correctGoal – 80% of items correctin Obj. 4



2010 - 2011


Instructional Improvement Process (IIP) for PD Groups and Campus GAN:Planning for Like Subjects SMART Goals (Science/Mathematics) Analyzing Failure Data

Addressing Troublesome SE’s Comparative Analysis of Questions Writing TAKS questionsAnalyzing AP Data/AP Potential Item Analysis of Assessments Writing Common AssessmentsAnalyzing Analytical Data from PSATSOAS Data – College Board

Share Best Lessons Creating Essential Lessons

SAT Strategies Instructional Research Analyzing Eduphoria/AWARE DataDepartment Generated Topics The Lesson Study Quality Assessment and GradingSAT Online Course Complex Thinking Critical Thinking/Problem SolvingHunter Lesson Design Deep understanding of critical

skills/concepts

SAT Grammar, Critical Reading

Critical Writing

Campus Wide Topics:Note Taking Book Study Walk -ThroughsContent Literacy/Reading Strategies Feedback Teacher ObservationsRigorous Curriculum (High Standards) Q and A Sessions

(Higher OrderThinking Strategies)

SAT Writing Strategies

Tips and Tricks for Technology SAT Grammar Strategies



2010 - 2011


Professional Development Schedule 2010 - 2011

Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday

Prof. Dev.Groups• Algebra I• Geometry• Algebra II• Biology• IPC• Chemistry• English I• English II• World Geog.• World Hist.

Like Subject IIPProcess

Like SubjectLesson Planning

Like Subject IIPProcess

Campus GANplanning for LikeSubjects

Like SubjectLesson Planning

2010 2011



2010 - 2011


Title I -- School-wide Components (TS)TS 1. Comprehensive needs assessment

TS 2. School-wide reform strategies

TS 3. Highly qualified teachers

TS 4. Professional development

TS 5. Strategies to attract high-quality highly qualified teachers to high need schoolsTS 6. Parental involvement

TS 7. Assisting preschool children in the transition from early childhood programs

TS 8. Measures to include teachers in the decisions regarding use of academic assessments

TS 9. Students’ difficulties identified on a timely basis

TS10.Coordination and integration between federal, state, and local services



2010 - 2011




*TS 3, 4 Attract and retain HQ teachers. Assist

teachers not currently HQ certified tomeet the requirements in timelymanner.

Participate in recruitingtrips and job fairs.Encourage teachersseeking initial oradditional certifications toattend district offeredtraining on TExES

examination.

August 2010-May 2011 Joe Pouncy

2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Smith

Documents

Transcript of 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Smith