2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Furneaux

8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Furneaux

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-2011-campus-improvement-plan-furneaux 1/23

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD Improvement Plan 2010 – 2011 1

Campus Plans

CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD

Furneaux Elementary

CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN2010-2011

Principal: Jim H. CunninghamAssistant Principal: Judy Bartlett

Mission Statement:

Children First at Furneaux Elementary

October 1, 2010



Campus Improvement Plan 2010 - 2011

2

CIC MEMBERS

Name Position Years Served Signature

Bartlett, Judy Assistant Principal 3Collins, Peggy Teacher – Kindergarten 3Cunningham, Jim Principal 13Davis, Michelle Teacher – Art 3Haltiner, Priss Instructional Facilitator 5Hulsebus, Dawn Teacher – 4th Grade 0Lane, Tara ESL/Math Instructional Facilitator 2

Oorlog, Allyson Teacher – 3rd

Grade 1Turner, Michelle Teacher – 1st Grade 1Ware, Derek Teacher – 2nd Grade 1Genette, Stephanie Parent, PTA President 1(Adding additional Parent) Parent 0(Adding additional Parent) Parent 0(Adding additional Parent) Parent 0




3

PLANNING PROCESS

NEEDS ASSESSMENT

The campus staff elects members to the Campus Improvement Council. Representatives are selected from each grade level, special education, fine

arts, and physical education, other electives, and non-teaching professionals. Additionally three staff members are elected “at large.” These people

can come from any grade level or department and are elected by popular vote. Parent and business representatives complete the CIC membership.The primary responsibilities of the Campus Improvement Council members include:

• Providing leadership in identifying TAKS, fitness assessment, and campus performance goals

•

Providing leadership in the development and implementation of the campus improvement plan• Assisting in the development of the campus budget

• Providing recommendations in the implementation of the campus budget

• Provide input on campus staff development

• Assisting in identifying campus staff development needs

• Chairing a campus committee when the need arises

• Providing leadership in developing a master calendar for the school year

• Providing assistance in monitoring and updating campus policies and procedures

In establishing campus goals, objectives and strategies for the 2010-2011 campus improvement plan, the following needs assessments were

considered:

AEIS and AYP reports

End of year assessment results including failure rates, Algebra I End-of-course results, special education assessments, and fitness gramassessment

Parent survey results (conducted in spring 2010)

Information and feedback gathered in parent meetings including PTA board meetings, Parent Advisory Meetings, etc.

Information and feedback gathered in CIC Teacher Survey

Annual analysis of the plan and review of various assessment data are used to determine objectives that address campus goals. Specific strategiesand action steps are developed to address these objectives. This process ensures a commitment to excellence and a resolve to provide the best

instructional plan for every student.




4

Title I -- School-wide Components (TS)

TS 1. Comprehensive needs assessmentTS 2. School-wide reform strategiesTS 3. Highly qualified teachersTS 4. Professional developmentTS 5. Strategies to attract high-quality highly qualified teachers to high need schoolsTS 6. Parental involvementTS 7. Assisting preschool children in the transition from early childhood programsTS 8. Measures to include teachers in the decisions regarding use of academic assessmentsTS 9. Students difficulties identified on a timely basisTS10. Coordination and integration between federal, state, and local services




5

The Goal of C-FB ISD is high achievement for all students.

Supporting Objective 1: Continuously increase student achievementA. TEA Recognized/Exemplary DistrictB. Recognized/Exemplary SchoolsC. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)D. Achievement GapE. Special PopulationsF. TAKS Commended Scores (all students)G. Higher Education Readiness Component (TSI) (EXIT Scores)

H. SATI. PSAT/NMSQTJ. Advanced PlacementK. Graduation Data

Supporting Objective 2: Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staffA. Out of School SuspensionsB. DAEP PlacementsC. Attendance Rate

Supporting Objective 3: Continuously increase operational effectivenessA. Financial Integrity Rating System in Texas (School FIRST)B. Increase percentage of operating expenditures expended for instructionC. Fund balance as a percentage of the total expenditure budget excluding TIF and Chapter 41 paymentsD. Kilowatt hour per sq. ft. usageE. Overtime hoursF. Highly Qualified Teachers

G. Teacher Classroom Attendance RateH. All Staff Attendance RateI. Teacher Turnover RateJ. Availability of Critical Technology Systems

Supporting Objective 4: Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school systemA. Parent Survey - Achieving Quality TogetherB. Stakeholder Survey (to be developed)

C. Staff Survey (to be developed)




7

All SEs associated withObjective 1:

Grade 3: 3.4B, 3.5A

Grade 4: 4.5A

Grade 5: 5.1B, 5.3E

Unit Tests TAKS RtI(Progress

Monitoring) MAP Tests

Objective 6: Demonstrate an

understanding of mathprocesses and tools used in

problem situations. (%itemscorrect)3rd 4th 5th

Overall 77 75 77ED 77 71 74AA 76 62 77H 74 77 70W 79 79 82SE 75 63 50LEP 71 62 67

GT 100 91 88

Objective 6: Demonstrate an understanding ofmath processes and tools used in problemsituations.

3rd

20113rd2012

4h

20114th 2012

5th

20115th 2012

Overall 82 87 80 85 82 87ED 82 87 81 86 80 85AA 81 86 70 75 82 87H 80 85 82 87 75 80W 85 90 85 90 87 92SE 80 85 70 75 60 65LEP 75 80 70 75 73 77GT 100 100 96 100 95 100


Grade 3: 3.14B, 3.14A

Grade 4: 4.14C

Grade 5: 5.14B



Objective 1: Demonstrate an understanding ofnumbers, operations, and quantitative reasoning.

3rd

20113rd2012

4th

20114

th

2012

5th

20115

th

2012

Overall 91 96 92 97 85 90

ED 92 97 91 96 85 90

AA 90 95 90 95 75 80

H 91 96 90 95 85 90

W 93 98 95 100 88 93

SE 88 93 82 87 60 65

LEP 85 90 85 90 85 90

GT 100 100 100 100 100 100

TAKS Scores2010 (Actual % Passing)

3rd 4th

5thOverall 94 87 92

ED 95 87 92AA 89 78 75H 89 86 91W 100 90 96SE 75 50 25

LEP 87 60 100GT 100 100 100Commended 37 34 35

Objective 1: Demonstrate anunderstanding of numbers,operations, and quantitative

reasoning. (%items correct)3rd 4th 5th

Overall 86 87 80ED 85 86 81AA 84 84 68H 86 85 80W 88 89 83SE 83 77 56LEP 80 80 79GT 97 98 98

By 2012 95% ofstudents will

meet or exceedthe proficiencystandard onTAKS in Math.

SMARTGOAL

INDICATORS MEASURES TARGETS

Elementary Math Grades 3-5 (2010 AEIS IT Group Summary Report – Percent Items Correct)




8


Grade 5: 5.8A

Unit Tests

TAKS RtI(ProgressMonitoring)

MAP Tests

Objective 4: Demonstrate an

understanding of the earthscience. (%items correct)

3rd 4th 5thOverall 74ED 70AA 62

H 70W 84SE 42LEP 55GT 80

Objective 4: Demonstrate an understanding of the

earth science.

3rd

20113rd2012

4h

20114

th

20125

th

20115

th

2012Overall 80 85ED 75 80

AA 66 70H 75 80W 90 95SE 50 55LEP 60 65GT 85 90


Grade 5: 5.6B, 3.11D,3.11A

Unit Tests TAKS

RtI(ProgressMonitoring)

MAP Tests

Objective 3: Demonstrate an understanding of thenature of science.

3rd

20113rd2012

4th

20114

th

20125

th

20115

th

2012

Overall 88 93

ED 85 90

AA 83 88

H 85 90

W 90 95

SE 66 70

LEP 70 75

GT 100 100

Objective 3: Demonstrate anunderstanding of the nature ofscience. (%items correct)

3rd 4th 5thOverall 83ED 80

AA 78H 80W 87SE 61LEP 64GT 94

TAKS Scores

2010 (Actual % Passing)3rd 4th

5th

Overall 82ED 76AA 75H 68W 96SE 25LEP 20GT 100

Commended 40

By 2012 95% ofstudents willmeet or exceedthe proficiency

standard onTAKS inScience.

SMARTGOAL

INDICATORS MEASURES TARGETS

Elementary Science Grade 5 (2010 AEIS IT Group Summary Report – Percent Items Correct)




9


Grade 3: 3.9H, 3.8D

Grade 4: none

Grade 5: 5.10G, 5.10F



Objective 2: Apply knowledge

of literary elements tounderstand culturally diversewritten texts. (%items correct)

3rd 4th 5thOverall 86 87 83ED 85 85 82

AA 77 76 71H 86 88 80W 87 91 91SE 86 75 50LEP 81 72 77GT 100 100 97

Objective 2: Apply knowledge of literary elementsto understand culturally diverse written texts.

3rd

20113rd2012

4h

20114

th

20125

th

20115

th

2012Overall 91 96 92 97 88 93ED 90 95 90 95 87 92AA 82 87 81 86 76 81H 91 96 93 98 85 90

W 92 97 96 100 96 100SE 91 96 80 85 55 60LEP 86 91 77 82 82 87GT 100 100 100 100 100 100


Grade 3: 3.11J

Grade 4: none

Grade 5: none



Objective 1: Demonstrate a basic understandingof culturally diverse written texts.

3rd

20113rd2012

4th

20114

th

20125

th

20115

th

2012

Overall 92 97 86 91 91 96

ED 93 98 84 89 92 97AA 90 95 77 82 87 92

H 88 93 86 91 91 96

W 99 100 91 96 91 96

SE 93 98 78 83 64 69

LEP 83 88 70 75 75 80

GT 100 100 100 100 100 100

TAKS Scores2010 (Actual %Passing)

3rd 4th

5thOverall 97 92 93

ED 97 92 92AA 89 67 83H 96 96 88W 100 95 100SE 100 100 50LEP 93 80 60GT 100 100 100Commended 54 27 28

By 2012 95% ofstudents willmeet or exceedthe proficiency

standard onTAKS inReading.

Objective 1: Demonstrate abasic understanding ofculturally diverse written texts.(%items correct)

3rd 4th 5thOverall 87 81 86

ED 88 79 87AA 85 72 82H 83 81 86W 94 86 86SE 88 73 59LEP 78 65 70GT 100 98 94

SMARTGOAL INDICATORS MEASURES TARGETS

Elementar Readin Grades 3-5 – Part 1 2010 AEIS IT Grou Summar Re ort – Percent Items Correct




10


Grade 3: none

Grade 4: 4.10I, 4.12A,4.12C

Grade 5: none



Objective 4: Apply critical

thinking skills to analyzeculturally diverse written texts.(%items correct)

3rd 4th 5thOverall 84 81 80ED 82 79 79AA 72 60 75

H 83 84 77W 88 86 86SE 81 50 52LEP 76 76 58GT 96 98 86

Objective 4: Apply critical thinking skills to analyzeculturally diverse written texts.

3rd

20113rd2012

4h

20114

th

20125

th

20115

th

2012Overall 88 93 85 90 85 90ED 85 90 85 90 85 90AA 78 83 70 75 80 85H 88 93 88 93 83 87W 92 97 90 95 90 95SE 85 88 60 65 55 60LEP 80 85 80 85 65 70GT 100 100 100 100 100 100


Grade 3: none

Grade 4: 4.12B

Grade 5: 5.12B



Objective 3: Use a variety of strategies to analyzeculturally diverse written texts.

3rd

20113rd2012

4th

20114

th

20125

th

20115

th

2012

Overall 88 93 88 93 88 93

ED 90 94 87 92 85 90

AA 88 93 70 75 84 88

H 88 93 90 95 85 90

W 90 95 95 98 92 97

SE 90 93 75 80 55 60

LEP 80 85 75 80 62 70

GT 100 100 100 100 100 100


Elementar Readin Grades 3-5 – Part 2 2010 AEIS IT Grou Summar Re ort – Percent Items Correct

By 2012 95% ofstudents willmeet or exceedthe proficiencystandard on

TAKS inReading.

Objective 3: Use a variety ofstrategies to analyze culturallydiverse written texts. (%itemscorrect)

3rd 4th 5thOverall 84 84 82ED 87 82 79

AA 83 66 78H 83 86 80W 87 91 87SE 87 71 47LEP 75 68 57GT 100 96 84

TAKS Scores2010 (Actual %Passing)

3rd 4th

5th

Overall 97 92 93ED 97 92 92AA 89 67 83H 96 96 88W 100 95 100SE 100 100 50LEP 93 80 60GT 100 100 100




11

All SEs associatedwith Objective 4:

Grade 4: 4.18B

Unit Tests TAKS


MAP Tests

Objective 5: Recognize

standard usage and appropriateword choice in written text.(%items correct)

3rd 4th 5thOverall 86ED 85AA 87

H 82W 92SE 87LEP 62GT 97

Objective 5: Recognize standard usage and

appropriate word choice in written text.

3rd

20113rd2012

4h

20114

th

20125

th

20115

th

2012Overall 90 95ED 90 95

AA 92 97H 88 93W 95 98SE 90 95LEP 70 75GT 100 100

All SEs associatedwith Objective 6:

Grade 4: 4.18C

Unit Tests TAKS


MAP Tests

Objective 4: Recognize correct and effectivesentence construction in written text.

3rd

20113rd2012

4th

20114

th

20125

th

20115

th

2012

Overall 83 88

ED 83 88

AA 80 85

H 83 88

W 88 93

SE 70 75

LEP 60 65

GT 100 100

By 2012 95% ofstudents willmeet or exceedthe proficiencystandard onTAKS inWriting.

Objective 4: Recognize correctand effective sentenceconstruction in written text.(%items correct)

3rd 4th 5thOverall 78

ED 77AA 73H 77W 83SE 62LEP 55GT 97

TAKS Scores

2010 (Actual %Passing)

3rd 4th

5th

Overall 90ED 90AA 89H 82W 100SE 100

LEP 20GT 100Commended 27


Elementary Writing Grade 4 (2010 AEIS IT Group Summary Report – Percent Items Correct)




12

FurneauxCampus Goals & Objectives

2010 TAKS, PARTICIPATION, & ATTENDANCE DATA

2011 GOALS

All Students African American Hispanic White Special Ed EconomicallyDisadvantaged

LEP

INDICATOR

2010 Goal 2010 Goal 2010 Goal 2010 Goal 2010 Goal 2010 Goal 2010 Goal

Reading/English Language Arts 94% 95% 81% 95% 93% 95% 98% 100% 80% 90% 94% 95% 86% 90%

Mathematics 91% 95% 78% 95% 89% 95% 96% 98% 54% 60% 91% 95% 86% 90%

Writing 90% 95% 88% 95% 82% 90% 100% 100% * 89% 95% 50% 60%

Science 81% 90% 73% 85% 67% 75% 96% 98% 40% 60% 77% 85% 42% 60%

Social Studies

All Tests

Participation: Reading/Language Arts 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Participation: Math 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Attendance (2008-2009) 97.2% 98% 96.8% 98% 97.4% 98.5% 96.7% 98% 96.8% 98% 97.6% 98.5% 98.0% 99%




13

Furneaux

Campus Goals2010 Percentage of Commended Students

2011 Goals

All Students African American Hispanic White

INDICATORCam-

pus State

+

- Goal

Cam-

pus State

+

- Goal

Cam-

pus State

+

- Goal

Cam-

pus State

+

- Goal

Reading/English

Language Arts35% 35% = 40% 33% 25% + 37% 26% 28% - 27% 48% 48% = 60%

Mathematics 45% 37% - 45% 18% 23% - 35% 31% 31% = 35% 46% 47% - 60%

Writing 25% 30% - 40% - 21% 60% 25% 25% = 35% 33% 38% - 45%

Science 40% 44% - 45% 36% 28% + 40% 36% 36% = 40% 53% 59% - 65%

Social Studies - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Special Ed. Economically Disadvantaged LEP

INDICATORCam-pus

State+-

GoalCam-pus

State+-

GoalCam-pus

State+-

Goal

5Reading/EnglishLanguage Arts

40% 17% - 45% 33% 26% + 35% 13% 23% - 25%

Mathematics 27% 17% - 30% 31% 28% + 40% 10% 25% - 30%

Writing - 11% 25% 18% 22% - 40% - 20% 25%

Science - 24% 27% 34% 33% + 37% - 20% 25%

Social Studies - - - - - - - - - - - -




15

2010-11 Campus Focus

District Supporting Objective #2: Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff

Campus Focus #3 Criteria for Success Performance Measure10% fewer behavioral referrals for 2010 - 2011 than in 2009-2010 A, E100% of all staff members working with students on a BIP will be trained or updated withCPI / Non-Violent Crisis Intervention

A, E

3. Provide a safe andpeaceful learningenvironment for allstudents




16


District Supporting Objective #3: Continuously increase operational effectiveness

Campus Focus #4 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureReduce electrical usage by 8%. D4. Reduce electrical usage




17


District Supporting Objective #4: Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our

school system

Campus Focus #5 Criteria for Success Performance Measure95% of all parents respond with a satisfactory approval on the annual 2010 springsurvey

A

Achieve 70% enrollment in PTA membershipIncrease Hispanic parent participation by 10% (using Spanish translators) AConduct parent-teacher conferences with 100% of the parents for all Kindergartenstudents during the first semester. Conduct 100% parent-teacher conferences for allbelow level students in 1

st– 5

thgrade during the first semester.

C

5. Improve Parent Involvement



DISTRICT VISION STATEMENT:All students will meet the Texas

Assessment of Knowledge & Skills at theproficient or commended level andgraduate college-ready withoutremediation.

CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISDCAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN

2009-2010

SUMMATIVE MEASURE:All students will:

• pass their respective grade levelTAKS

All campuses will:• meet or exceed the state’s number

of commended students on TAKS• receive a Recognized or Exemplary

accountability rating from TEAThe district will:

• receive a Recognized accountabilityrating from TEA

• have a minimum of 15 National MeritSemifinalists

Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD Improvement Plan 2010 – 2011 18

Campus Plans

CAMPUSGOALS

1 2 3 4 5

TARGETAREA

ACTION STRATEGYFORMATIVEMEASURE

ASSESSMENTTIMELINE

RESPONSIBLEPERSON(S)

COST/RESOURCES

X X

1. Provide RTI support for At-Riskstudents

At-Risk criteria reviewSNAP meetingsProgress ReportsIndividual AssessEnd of Unit AssessMAP Scores (5th grade)TAKS Scores

On-going Grade level teachersPriss HaltinerTara LaneVimidsa Silva-Montes

District Funds

X X TS 2, 5, 9

2. Provide before or after schooltutoring for students who failedTAKS or passed by only 3 or less

Prior TAKS resultsTAKS ReleaseEnd of Unit AssessMAP Scores (5

thgrade)

Friday School

October through May Classroom teachers andSupport Staff

Stimulus Funds - $5,662(for tutoring beyond 3:50)

X X X3. Meet with all students who failedTAKS prior year. Contact parentsand send home packet.

TAKS Results September, January &April

Jim CunninghamJudy Bartlett

X X4. Assess math levels andadminister Universal Screening 1

US1Map Testing w/o goals

First 2 weeks ofenrollment

Tara Lane5

thGrade Math teacher

District Math Assessments

X X X

5. Continually identify lowperformers and assess and monitortheir progress to determine readinglevels.

SNAP MeetingsData analysisTPRI/Fountas & PinnellTAKS ReleaseTAKSMAP Scores (5th grade)

Every Progress Reportingperiod,December/January TAKSRelease and On-goingwith all otherassessments

Jim CunninghamPriss Haltiner – ReadingClassroom teacher

TAKS ResultsAWARE DataReading Assessment Results




19

CAMPUSGOALS

1 2 3 4 5

TARGETAREA


ASSESSMENTTIMELINE


COST/RESOURCES

X X X

6. Parent contact for excessiveabsences by letter, phone and homevisitsMaintain 98%

Attendance reportsTEAMS data

On-going and as needed Donna BoettcherJim Cunningham

Campus Funds

X X

TS 2, 3, 5, 6,9, 10

7. Analyze testing results ofUniversal Screenings, End of UnitAssessments, MAP tests (5

thgrade)

and TAKS Release tests to ensurelow performing students havenecessary interventions & supportprograms – ESL, IS,

TAKS ResultsData AnalysisProgress MonitoringMAP Scores (5

thgrade)

September – May Classroom teachersParentsTara LaneTitle I TutorsPriss HaltinerTeresa Seeber

Curriculum & Instruction Dept.

X X

8. Teach curriculum the way it istested, teach it extensively & deeply,teach vocabulary regularly.

Lesson PlansAdministrativeWalkthroughs andObservationsGuiding ReadingWalkthroughs

On-going Classroom teachersSupport StaffTeachers (ELL, CM, IF)

Campus Funds

X X

TS 29. Implement vocabulary strategiesand approach across subjects andgrades K – 5 to enhance voice inwritten compositions, readingcomprehension & backgroundknowledge within various

subgroups.

TAKS Release resultsClassroom observationsProgress reportsBenchmark Writing &Reading resultsLesson Plans

September – May Classroom teachersPriss HaltinerTara LaneTitle I Tutors

District/Campus FundsCOLCurriculum & Instruction Dept.

X X

10. Red Ribbon Week activities topromote good choices and DrugFree Life

CLTAction Teams

Fall SemesterRevisit during the year

Cheryl BrittonClassroom teachersJim CunninghamPTA Red Ribbonrepresentative

PTA Funds

X X

11. Character Education throughFETV, grade level assemblies,‘R-Time’, discipline response andWords of Wisdom. Celebrate andappreciate the diversity of ourcampus by celebrating differences,while also focusing on what unitesus and makes us similar throughcultural performances andcommunity sharing.

Parent SurveyDiscipline Referrals willbe cut by 10%Demographic trendsChange in ourcommunity

On-going Jim CunninghamJudy BartlettDonna DurrantCheryl BrittonTeresa SeeberClassroom teachers

PTA fundsLibrary fundsTechnology grantsR-Time resources




23

CAMPUSGOALS

1 2 3 4 5

TARGETAREA


ASSESSMENTTIMELINE


COST/RESOURCES

X X

35. Identify and respond to theneeds of SSI students, closelymonitoring their progress onbenchmarks and tests.

Prior year’s TAKS resultsReading LevelMath DiagnosticAssessment

MAP testing (5th

grade)Fountas & Pinnellassessments

On-goingSNAP meetings - End ofeach 9 wks

Priss HaltinerJudy BartlettTara LaneJim Cunningham

Classroom teachers

X X X

36. Meet with parents of SSIstudents frequently, send homeprogress reports

Prior year’s TAKS resultsReading LevelMath DiagnosticAssessment

On-going Priss HaltinerJim CunninghamJudy BartlettClassroom teachers

X X X37. Organize a TAKS night forparents

TAKS resultsParent survey

November – January Classroom teachersJim CunninghamJudy Bartlett

X X TS 238. Provide classroomsubscriptions to enhance learning inthe classroom (2nd – 5th grade)

Teacher Lesson Plans On-going Classroom teachersPatti Sloey

Campus Funds

X39. Homeroom teachers willincorporate portions of thefitnessgram in daily CATCH

Teacher Lesson Plansand CATCHdocumentation

On-going Homeroom Teachers CATCH Activity Boxes

X

40. Components of CATCHincorporate moderate to vigorousphysical exercise into dailystructured activities

Physical EducationTeacher’s Lesson Plan

On-going Physical EducationTeachers

CATCH Activity BoxesFitnessgram Assessment

X41. All PE Classes will incorporatefitnessgram into warm up activities

Teacher Lesson Plans On-going Physical EducationTeachers

Fitnessgram Guidelines

X

42. All Health Classes will correlatethe importance of fitness tostudents’ health, nutrition, andimproved standardized test scores

Teacher Lesson PlansCafeteria “Go, Slow andWhoa” items

On-going Classroom teachersPhysical EducationTeachersCaryn EvensonCafeteria staff

Health Textbooks

X43. Implement Test Protocols / Procedures as per district/statemandate

Fitnessgram Test Fall 2010 Physical EducationTeachers

Fitnessgram Assessment

2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Furneaux

Documents

Transcript of 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Furneaux