2009 FUSION Presentation - Student Survey Data
-
Upload
barry-dahl -
Category
Education
-
view
2.445 -
download
3
description
Transcript of 2009 FUSION Presentation - Student Survey Data
![Page 1: 2009 FUSION Presentation - Student Survey Data](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051513/546340c0af7959ba618b4f72/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Results Might Surprise You
Online Student Survey Data
Barry DahlLake Superior College
![Page 2: 2009 FUSION Presentation - Student Survey Data](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051513/546340c0af7959ba618b4f72/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Option 1 - PSOL
![Page 3: 2009 FUSION Presentation - Student Survey Data](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051513/546340c0af7959ba618b4f72/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Why PSOL?
![Page 4: 2009 FUSION Presentation - Student Survey Data](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051513/546340c0af7959ba618b4f72/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
PSOL BasicsThere are 72 questions that comprise the PSOL. Average completion time is 15 minutes.
NOTE: questions are answered on a 7-point Likert scale, where 7 is high.
26 Priorities statements (can add 10)
7 Information sources about school/program
11 Factors to enroll in the program
3 Overall satisfaction questions
14 Demographics questions (can add 1)
![Page 5: 2009 FUSION Presentation - Student Survey Data](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051513/546340c0af7959ba618b4f72/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
The Importance of Importance
![Page 6: 2009 FUSION Presentation - Student Survey Data](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051513/546340c0af7959ba618b4f72/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Examples of Useful Reports
• Student satisfaction breakdown by online program area
• Primarily online vs. Primarily on-campus• Previous online enrollment• Age breakdown: 24 & under vs. 25 & up• Comparison to MnOnline consortium• Comparison to Peer Group of Schools
![Page 7: 2009 FUSION Presentation - Student Survey Data](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051513/546340c0af7959ba618b4f72/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Data Comparisons - 1
7
![Page 8: 2009 FUSION Presentation - Student Survey Data](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051513/546340c0af7959ba618b4f72/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Data Comparisons - 2
8
![Page 9: 2009 FUSION Presentation - Student Survey Data](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051513/546340c0af7959ba618b4f72/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
A.A. Students are Very Satisfied
Reputation Offerings Library Quality4.6
4.8
5.0
5.2
5.4
5.6
5.8
6.0
6.2
LSC National A.A. Business Other
2006 Data
![Page 10: 2009 FUSION Presentation - Student Survey Data](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051513/546340c0af7959ba618b4f72/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Primarily Online - LSC Students
Tuition Responds Technical Fin. Aid4.8
5.0
5.2
5.4
5.6
5.8
6.0
LSC National Online On-Campus
2006 Data
![Page 11: 2009 FUSION Presentation - Student Survey Data](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051513/546340c0af7959ba618b4f72/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
5-year Trend Data
11
![Page 12: 2009 FUSION Presentation - Student Survey Data](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051513/546340c0af7959ba618b4f72/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
4-year Trend Data
12
![Page 13: 2009 FUSION Presentation - Student Survey Data](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051513/546340c0af7959ba618b4f72/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Strengths/Challenges
• Noel-Levitz identifies strengths and challenges based on your data.
• I call these “Internal” strengths and challenges. They might not be a strength or a challenge when compared to others.
![Page 14: 2009 FUSION Presentation - Student Survey Data](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051513/546340c0af7959ba618b4f72/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Matrix for Prioritizing Action
Very Important
Very Unimportant
Very
DissatisfiedVery
Satisfied
1811 32
??
?
![Page 15: 2009 FUSION Presentation - Student Survey Data](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051513/546340c0af7959ba618b4f72/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Noel-Levitz Prioritization Matrix
FY06 Noel-Levitz PSOL - LSC Primarily Online Students
1.00
4.00
7.00
1.00 4.00 7.00
Satisfaction
Imp
ort
an
ce
![Page 16: 2009 FUSION Presentation - Student Survey Data](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051513/546340c0af7959ba618b4f72/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
FY06 Noel-Levitz PSOL - LSC Primarily Online Students
5.00
6.00
7.00
5.00 6.00 7.00
Satisfaction
Imp
ort
an
ce
LSC Prioritization Matrix
![Page 17: 2009 FUSION Presentation - Student Survey Data](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051513/546340c0af7959ba618b4f72/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Matrix for Prioritizing Action #2
Very Important
Somewhat Important
Somewhat
SatisfiedVery
Satisfied
1811 32
308
29
20 6
12
25
410
1
![Page 18: 2009 FUSION Presentation - Student Survey Data](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051513/546340c0af7959ba618b4f72/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18NOTE: SSI is the Noel-Levitz Survey for on-ground learners, PSOL is the Noel-Levitz survey for online learners.
![Page 19: 2009 FUSION Presentation - Student Survey Data](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051513/546340c0af7959ba618b4f72/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19NOTE: SSI is the Noel-Levitz Survey for on-ground learners, PSOL is the Noel-Levitz survey for online learners.
![Page 20: 2009 FUSION Presentation - Student Survey Data](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051513/546340c0af7959ba618b4f72/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Peer Group Comparison
• Better than National data• Better than consortium data• We picked 10-13 schools with similar
missions and circumstances• Noel-Levitz ran a special report for us• 2006 (13 schools) and 2008 (10 schools)
![Page 21: 2009 FUSION Presentation - Student Survey Data](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051513/546340c0af7959ba618b4f72/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Largest Differences - Peer Group
4.00
4.50
5.00
5.50
6.00
6.50
7.00
14. Info aboutfinancial aid
24. Tutoringavailable
18. Convenientregistration
20. Quality ofinstruction
13. Facultyinteractions
FY06 Primarily Online Students - PSOL
LSC Peer Group
![Page 22: 2009 FUSION Presentation - Student Survey Data](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051513/546340c0af7959ba618b4f72/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Added Questions
• 10 spots for additional statements• MnSCU uses 5 spots for MnOnline
questions, including reliability of D2L• LSC uses 5 spots to ask about things of
importance. This year we hit a sweet spot with student importance.
![Page 23: 2009 FUSION Presentation - Student Survey Data](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051513/546340c0af7959ba618b4f72/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
D2L Student Ratings
2006 2007 2008 2009 4.00
4.50
5.00
5.50
6.00
6.50
7.00
MN Online - Student Ratings for D2L - Reliability
Importance Satisfaction
![Page 24: 2009 FUSION Presentation - Student Survey Data](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051513/546340c0af7959ba618b4f72/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
5 Added Items for LSC in 2009
FY09 Noel-Levitz PSOL (Priorities Survey for Online Learners) LSC Students Item - Importance high to low Import. Satisf. Gap
32. Layout of courses, as designed by instructors, is easy to navigate and understand. 6.60 5.83 0.77 33. Instructions to students on how to meet the course learning objectives are adequate and clearly written. 6.58 5.90 0.68 20. The quality of online instruction is excellent. 6.56 5.68 0.88 28. The online course delivery platform (Desire2Learn or D2L) is reliable. 6.56 6.04 0.52 34. Grading policies are easy to locate and understand in courses. 6.56 6.09 0.47
06. Tuition paid is a worthwhile investment. 6.55 5.77 0.78
18. Registration for online courses is convenient. 6.55 6.36 0.19 36. Clear standards are set in courses for instructor availability and response time. 6.55 5.99 0.56 31. Taking an online course allowed me to stay on track with my educational goals. 6.54 6.18 0.36 35. Instructional materials have sufficient depth in content to learn the subject. 6.54 5.91 0.63
![Page 25: 2009 FUSION Presentation - Student Survey Data](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051513/546340c0af7959ba618b4f72/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
What’s Missing?
• Student uses of technology• Computer skills assessment• Student success rates• Comparison between online and
on-ground students (using same survey)
![Page 26: 2009 FUSION Presentation - Student Survey Data](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051513/546340c0af7959ba618b4f72/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Student Technology Survey
![Page 27: 2009 FUSION Presentation - Student Survey Data](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051513/546340c0af7959ba618b4f72/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
High-speed Access Growth
![Page 28: 2009 FUSION Presentation - Student Survey Data](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051513/546340c0af7959ba618b4f72/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Student Uses of e-Services
0.56%
5.70%
2.80%
25.70%
33.70%
25.30%
0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00%
6
5
4
3
2
1 Never used it; didn't know about it.
Never used it; but was aware of it.
Have used it a little; will use again.
Have used it a lot; planning to continue the same.
Have used it a little; won’t use it again.
Have used it a lot; planning to reduce usage.
Online Library Services
![Page 29: 2009 FUSION Presentation - Student Survey Data](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051513/546340c0af7959ba618b4f72/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Student Uses of e-Services
0.30%
1.90%
1.60%
7.30%
32.30%
49.40%
0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00%
6
5
4
3
2
1 Never used it; didn't know about it.
Never used it; but was aware of it.
Have used it a lot; planning to continue the same.
Have used it a little; won’t use it again.
Have used it a lot; planning to reduce usage.
Online Career Services
Have used it a little; will use it again.
![Page 30: 2009 FUSION Presentation - Student Survey Data](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051513/546340c0af7959ba618b4f72/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Students & Technology - 2
![Page 31: 2009 FUSION Presentation - Student Survey Data](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051513/546340c0af7959ba618b4f72/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Student Uses of Technology
12.6%
0.2%
0.3%
0.1%
1.0%
82.8%
0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%
6
5
4
3
2
1 Do not use
Very frequently use
Frequently use
N/A
Second Life
Occasionally use
Rarely use
![Page 32: 2009 FUSION Presentation - Student Survey Data](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051513/546340c0af7959ba618b4f72/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Student Uses of Technology
12.0%
0.9%
0.4%
2.3%
4.8%
79.6%
0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0%
6
5
4
3
2
1 Do not use
Very frequently use
Frequently use
N/A
Flickr
Occasionally use
Rarely use
![Page 33: 2009 FUSION Presentation - Student Survey Data](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051513/546340c0af7959ba618b4f72/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Student Demographics
![Page 34: 2009 FUSION Presentation - Student Survey Data](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051513/546340c0af7959ba618b4f72/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Innovations in e-Education Survey Creation
Create a Student Technology Survey that:• measures importance of, satisfaction with, and
usage of online college services.• is applicable to both on-campus and online
students.• measures uses of technology and computer
literacy.• compares survey results with student success
factors.