2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)

8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)

1/150

All Sites

2005 2006 2007

InputsTotal Energy Consumption, GJ 3,000,611 2,233,706 142,803 6% $2,809,876 $773,045

Electricity consumption 1,334,868 1,109,399 88,732 8% $2,496,138 $767,695Natural Gas consumption 1,447,611 925,046 54,071 6% $313,638 $5,000Other fuel consumption 218,132 199,261 0 $100 $350

Total Water Consumption, m3 6,907,027 5,659,249 243,571 4% $81,310 $48,000Municipal 0 0

Well 0 4,460,746

OutputsGreen House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 283,673 221,870 13,891 6%

Indirect Emissions 194,285 160,009 11,317 7%Direct NG emisions 72,196 47,256 2,575 5%

Other direct emissions 17,192 14,605 0Total Effluent Discharged, m3 5,748,446 4,813,324 144,189 3%

To WWTP 0 0To municipal 0 0

Total Waste Generated, metric tones 35,144 26,988 489 2% $50,000Waste Disposed 21,704 16,427 489Waste Recycled 13,440 10,561 0

Total $2,941,187 $821,045

2008 P2E2 projectdescription

EstimatedEnergy, Water,

GHGs, or WasteReductions

Percentreductionfrom 2007

Cost Savings,USD

EstimatedCapital costs,

USD

Seeindividualfactory tabsfor project

descriptions

This coinformaincomprespon


2/150

Americas Region EMEAI East Region

InputsTotal Energy Consumption, GJ 50,102 6% $680,430 $253,500 41,522 13% $461,349 $0 23,487

Electricity consumption 17,705 4% $422,644 $248,500 19,848 15% $405,497 $0 23,487

Natural Gas consumption 32,397 8% $257,786 $5,000 21,674 14% $55,852 $0 0

Other fuel consumption 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0

Total Water Consumption, m3 46,477 12% $61,350 $0 33,310 19% $7,880 $0 133,822

Municipal

Well

Outputs

Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalent 5,483 6% 2,782 11% 3,336

Indirect Emissions 4,015 6% 1,675 11% 3,336Direct NG emisions 1,468 7% 1,107 14% 0

Other direct emissions 0 0 0

Total Effluent Discharged, m3 0 0% 10,328 13% 128,462

To WWTP

To municipal

Total Waste Generated, metric tones 0 0% $50,000 0 0% 113

Waste Disposed 0 0 113

Waste Recycled 0 0 0

Total $791,779 $253,500 $469,228 $0

EstimatedEnergy,Water,

GHGs, orWaste

Reductions


CostSavings,

USD

EstimatedCapital

costs, USD


GHGs, orWaste

Reductions


CostSavings,

USD

EstimatedCapital

costs, USD


GHGs, orWaste

Reductions


3/150

EMEAI West Region Asia / Pac Region

3% $993,421 $33,000 27,692 8% $673,577 $486,195

8% $993,421 $33,000 27,692 15% $673,577 $486,195

0% $0 $0 0 0% $0 $0

$0 $0 0 $0 $0

3% $0 $0 29,962 7% $10,581 $48,000

6% 2,291 5%

9% 2,291 6%0% 0 0%

0

3% 5,399 2%

1% 376 6%

376

0

$993,421 $33,000 $684,158 $534,195


CostSavings,

USD

EstimatedCapital

costs, USD


GHGs, orWaste

Reductions


CostSavings,

USD

EstimatedCapital

costs, USD


4/150

Americas Region

2005 2006 2007

InputsTotal Energy Consumption, GJ 1,336,492 881,681 50,102 6% $680,430

Electricity consumption 553,973 479,149 17,705 4% $422,644Natural Gas consumption 782,519 402,532 32,397 8% $257,786

Other fuel consumption 0 0 0 $0Total Water Consumption, m3 812,410 385,252 46,477 12% $61,350

Municipal 0 0Well 0 0



Other direct emissions 0 0 0Total Effluent Discharged, m3 387,766 128,408 0 0%


Total Waste Generated, metric tones 16,496 10,920 0 0% $50,000Waste Disposed 9,922 7,087 0Waste Recycled 6,574 3,833 0

Total $791,779


Estimated Energy,Water, GHGs, or

Waste Reductions

Percentreduction from

2007

Cost Savings,USD

Seeindividualfactory tabsfor projectdescriptions


5/150

$253,500$248,500

$5,000$0$0

$253,500


USD


6/150

EMEAI EAST Sites

2005 2006 2007

InputsTotal Energy Consumption, GJ 321,254 329,715 41,522 13% $462,449

Electricity consumption 134,866 131,103 19,848 15% $406,497Natural Gas consumption 141,493 154,812 21,674 14% $55,852

Other fuel consumption 44,895 43,800 0 $100Total Water Consumption, m3 223,593 177,437 33,310 19% $9,380




Other direct emissions 3,128 3,052 0Total Effluent Discharged, m3 62,227 76,923 10,328 13%


Total Waste Generated, metric tones 1,467 1,071 0 0%Waste Disposed 945 697 0Waste Recycled 523 374 0

Total $471,828



Waste Reductions


2007

Cost Savings,USD



7/150

$350$0

$0$350$0

$350


USD


8/150

Asia/Pac Region

2005 2006 2007


Electricity consumption 239,534 190,726 27,692 15% $673,577Natural Gas consumption 17,902 11,530 0 0% $0

Other fuel consumption 146,361 141,854 0 $0Total Water Consumption, m3 489,676 442,679 29,962 7% $10,581



Indirect Emissions 49,692 39,493 2,291 6%Direct NG emisions 914 589 0 0%

Other direct emissions 12,222 10,605 0Total Effluent Discharged, m3 277,320 261,600 5,399 2%

To WWTP 0 0To municipal 0 0Total Waste Generated, metric tones 6,706 6,335 376 6%

Waste Disposed 4,011 3,409 376Waste Recycled 2,695 2,926 0

Total $684,158



Waste Reductions


2007

Cost Savings,USD



9/150

$486,195$486,195

$0$0$48,000

$534,195


USD


10/150

EMEAI WEST Sites

2005 2006 2007


Electricity consumption 406,495 312,587 23,487 8% $993,421Natural Gas consumption 505,697 356,172 0 0% $0

Other fuel consumption 26,876 13,607 0 $0Total Water Consumption, m3 5,381,348 4,653,881 133,822 3% $0

Municipal 0 0Well 0 4,460,746


Indirect Emissions 48,446 36,901 3,336 9%Direct NG emisions 24,022 18,194 0 0%

Other direct emissions 1,842 948 0Total Effluent Discharged, m3 5,021,133 4,346,393 128,462 3%

To WWTP 0 0To municipal 0 0Total Waste Generated, metric tones 10,474 8,662 113 1%

Waste Disposed 6,826 5,233 113Waste Recycled 3,648 3,428 0

Total $993,421



Waste Reductions


2007

Cost Savings,USD



11/150

$33,000$33,000

$0$0$0

$33,000


USD


12/150

Antipolo City

2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description

Inputs

Total Energy Consumption, GJ 28,562 27,830 8346 30Electricity consumption 22,162 21,011 t otal electrical reduction 8346 40

3941 19

Lighting: install an automatic light flux regulator 18 0

Improve monitoring of chillers efficiency 23 0

551 3

233 1

21 0

89 0

Close cooling tunnels ducts (open on top). 89 0

Increase mainteinance of motors

1141 5

Solar water heating of hot water 1744 8

496 2


Waste Reductions

Percent reductiofrom 2007

New boiler installation - site reports this asproject for 2008

Install VSD drives for boiler air blower controlled

by flue monitorControl Dissolved Oxygen content in WWTPand close loop blowers

MCC improvement (autamatic stop of motion ifnot required)

Reduction of Air Compressed usage inproduction (empty bags)

Energy monitoring and targeting on steam

consumption install meters for key users

Monitor steam production and efficiency of theboilers

Pre-heat of combustion air through effluent fluegas economizer a)

Pre-heat of make-up water through effluent fluegas economizer b)

Condensate collection completion to 100% (nowis 80%)

Coating pan water after washing: flush through aheat exchanger to pre heat cleaning water itselfor domestic water

Improve efficiency of Boilers through correctpressure dimensioning


13/150

Blow down of Boiler to pre-heat make-up water

Natural Gas consumption 0 0Other fuel consumption 6,400 6,819

Total Water Consumption, m3 14,343 17,512

MunicipalWell

OutputsGreen House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 3,272 3,154 1238 46

Indirect Emissions 2,826 2,679 New boiler installation - as est by site 1238 46Direct NG emisions 0 0

Other direct emissions 446 475Total Effluent Discharged, m3 8,709 7,431

To WWTPTo municipal

Total Waste Generated, metric tones 1,002 850Waste Disposed 738 592Waste Recycled 264 258

Total cost savings

electricity 7.3 PHP/KWH

1 PHG =$0.025


14/150


15/150

$213,370$213,370

$0

$63,870

$28,000

$500

$35,000

$70,000

$16,000

EstimatedCapitalcosts,

USD

Budgetedfor in 2008?Yes/No

PARapproved?Yes/No

Is the metric for thisinitiative welldefined? Yes/No

Does your location have themeans of measuring the

metric? Yes/No

Date Started or EstimetedStaring Date

Date Finished orEstimated Finish date

Name of the personresponsible for this

initiative


16/150

$213,370 Total Capital


17/150


18/150

Major Issues or challengesIs this "on going" or"one time" effort?

Percent completed: NotStarted, 25%, 50%, 75%,

Finished

Overall Status for thiGreen, Yellow,


19/150


20/150


21/150

Asquith

2005 2006 2007

InputsTotal Energy Consumption, GJ 47159 34,064 2048 6%

Electricity consumption 29,257 22,534 2048

Natural Gas consumption 17,902 11,530Other fuel consumption 0 0

Total Water Consumption, m3 22,814 19,055 1140 6%Municipal 1140

Well

OutputsGreen House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 7777 5,875 440 7%

Indirect Emissions 6,863 5,286 440

Direct NG emisions 914 589


To WWTPTo municipal

Total Waste Generated, metric tones 871 547 41.42 8%Waste Disposed 575 290 41.42



Waste Reductions

Percent reductionfrom 2007

factory commitment to 5%reduction in energy use.Calc value by factory is2048 GJ

factory commitment to 5%reduction in water use.

Calc value by factory is1140 m3

factory commitment to 5%reduction in emissions.Calc value by factory is440 CO2 equiv.

factory commitment to 5%reduction in waste. Calcvalue by factory is 41.42tonnes


22/150

Waste Recycled 296 257

total cost savings

electricity cost 0.1 AUD/KWHwater cost 0.01 AUD/gallon1 AUD = 0.9 USD

factory commitment toincrease recycling by 10%

2007 values for inputs and outputs are based on

Jan- Sept data


23/150


24/150

$54,134 0

$51,425

$2,709

$2,709

Cost savings,USD

EstimatedCapitalcosts,USD


PARapproved?Yes/No



metric? Yes/No




25/150

$56,843 0 Total Capital


26/150


27/150


initiative

Is this "on going" or"one time" effort?

Percent completed: NotStarted, 25%, 50%, 75%,

Finished


28/150


29/150


30/150

Major Issues or challenges Overall Status for this Initiative:Green, Yellow, Red


31/150


32/150


33/150

Baddi


Inputs

Total Energy Consumption, GJ 49,499 46,553 4652 10% $116,812

Electricity consumption 15,746 15,421 Total Electrical reduction 4652 30% $116,812

171 1% $4,294

342 2% $8,588

427 3% $10,722

72 0% $1,808

179 1% $4,495

VSD in air compressors 628 4% $15,769

Better insulation of all building 424 3% $10,647

Better insulation of curing rooms 21 0% $527

Shading HVAC condensers 215 1% $5,399

53 0% $1,331

1897 12% $47,634

15 0% $377

1 0% $25

Install electronic ballasts on 2x40 W tubes 202 1% $5,072

Complete condensate return - part B 5 0% $126


Waste Reductions


Costsavings,

USD

1. Install overhead water storage tanks toeliminate cotinuous pumping in toilets andcanteen

2. Recycle vacuum pump water back tocooling tower

3. Replace AC plant with high efficiencyunits and close loop control

Rectify distribution lines of Compressed

AirReduce leakages by installing segm.valves and monitoring

Better mainteinance of cooling tunnel 2JOT

Substitute decentralized units with a new

centralized chilled water unitImprove efficiency of water pumpingsystem

Install automatic "too full" control fortreated water tanks

Substitute boiler with smaller moreefficient boiler


34/150

Insulate thermically the condensate tank

Solar heating of boiler make-up waterWaste heat recovery from DGs

Waste heat recovery from Incinerator

Solar water heating of process raw water


Total Water Consumption, m3 71,709 52,857 18750 35%Municipal

Well 18750

OutputsGreen House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 6,488 6,220 123 2%

Indirect Emissions 4,136 4,051 assume 2% reductionDirect NG emisions 0 0

Other direct emissions 2,352 2,169Total Effluent Discharged, m3 0 0 0

To WWTP

To municipalTotal Waste Generated, metric tones 61 186Waste Disposed 61 186Waste Recycled 0 0

total savings $116,812

electricity cost: 3.6 INR/KWH

I INR = 0.025 USD

Eliminate leakages by continuousmonitoring and maint.

Complete condensate return - part A + B(only in $ sav)

1. Install overhead water storage tanks toeliminate continuous pumping in toilets &canteen thereby reducing the flow ofwater waste. 2. Vacuum pump water tobe recycled back to spare cooling tower.


35/150


36/150

0


Budgeted forin 2008?Yes/No

PAR approved?Yes/No

Is the metric for thisinitiative well defined?Yes/No


metric? Yes/No

Date Started orEstimeted Staring

Date

Date Finished orEstimated Finish

date


initiative


37/150

0 total capital


38/150


39/150


Percent completed: NotStarted, 25%, 50%,

75%, Finished

Overall Status for thisInitiative: Green, Yellow,

Red


40/150


41/150


42/150

Bangalore

2005 2006 2007

Inputs


Electricity consumption 7,025 7,166 1920 27% $66,960

Natural Gas consumption 0 0Other fuel consumption 11,142 12,668 .

Total Water Consumption, m3 22,396 20,543Municipal

Well


Indirect Emissions 1,846 1,882 assume 25% reduction 471 25%Direct NG emisions 0 0


To WWTPTo municipal

Total Waste Generated, metric tones 97 70Waste Disposed 15 29Waste Recycled 82 41




Waste Reductions


2007

Costsavings,

USD

Installation of Power factorController panel to improvethe existing power factorfrom 0.89 to 0.99. Theproject includes design apower factor controller,manufacture at supplierend and install at our site.


43/150

electricity cost: 5 INR/KWH

I INR = 0.025 USD


44/150

0

0 total capital



PARapproved? Yes/No


Does your location have themeans of measuring the metric?

Yes/No


Date


date

Name of theperson responsible

for this initiative


45/150


46/150


Percent completed:Not Started, 25%,

50%, 75%, Finished

Major Issuesor challenges


Red


47/150


48/150

Biesheim

2005 2006 2007

InputsTotal Energy Consumption, GJ 278,703 199,201

Electricity consumption 119,850 92,525Natural Gas consumption 158,385 106,676

Other fuel consumption 468 0Total Water Consumption, m3 5,134,607 4,460,746 133,822 3%

MunicipalWell 4,460,746 133,822

OutputsGreen House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 11,035 7,692

Indirect Emissions 2,905 2,243Direct NG emisions 8,127 5,449

Other direct emissions 3 0Total Effluent Discharged, m3 4,929,222 4,282,056 128,462 3%

To WWTPTo municipal 128,462

Total Waste Generated, metric tones 3,537 4,538 27 1%Waste Disposed 2,640 2,977 27

Waste Recycled 897 1,561total savings 0



Waste Reductions


2007

Cost savings,USD

Factory reports a 3%reduction goal for 2008

water cost isfree

assume 3% reduction inwastewater too

Factory reports 0.9%goal of waste reductionfor 2008


49/150

0 total capital


Budgeted for in2008? Yes/No

PARapproved?Yes/No

Is the metric forthis initiativewell defined?Yes/No

Does your locationhave the means of

measuring the metric?Yes/No


Date


date


for this initiative


50/150


Percentcompleted: NotStarted, 25%,

50%, 75%,Finished

Overall Status for thisInitiative: Green,

Yellow, Red

Ch tt


51/150

Chattanooga


Inputs

Total Energy Consumption, GJ 268,493 195,775 36434 19%Electricity consumption 75,549 81,351 total electric reduction 6944 9%

1792 2%

672 1%

4480 6%

Natural Gas consumption 192,944 114,424 Total Gas reduction 29490 26%14557 13%

3586 3%

2769 2%

8578 7%

Other fuel consumption 0 0Total Water Consumption, m3 138,450 113,835

MunicipalWell

Outputs

Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 22,049 19,521 2556 13%


Waste Reductions


2007

1. Leakage control for compressedair

2. Upgrade air compressor controlsystem

3. Heat recovery from aircompressors

4. Optimisation of compressed airdistribution system

5. Optimisation of chilled watersystem operation

6. Implement an energymanagement system

1. Install feedwater economiserson steam boilers

2. Control excess air in steamlines by managing oxygen;

3. Insulate steam valves &

fittings4. Inspect and repair steamtraps on a regular basis



52/150

Indirect Emissions 12,137 13,676 1504 11%

Direct NG emisions 9,912 5,845 1052 18%


To WWTPTo municipal

Total Waste Generated, metric tones 2,132 2,223Waste Disposed 1,443 369Waste Recycled 689 1,854

total savings

electricity cost: USD/KWHP2E2 study info gas cost =

Facility Area Opportunity GJ Therms kWh

Chattanooga Steam 138,000

Chattanooga Steam 34,000 5,000



Chattanooga Air 500,000

Chattanooga Air 30,000

Assume equivalent to electricalreduction percent reduction in GHG -11%

Assume equivalent to natural gasreduction percent reduction in GHG -18%

Estimated

Investment

Install feedwatereconomisers onsteam boilers

Control excess airby managingoxygen

Insulate steamvalves & fittings

Inspect andrepair steamtraps on a regularbasisLeakage controlfor compressedair

Upgrade aircompressorcontrol system


53/150

Chattanooga Air 2

Chattanooga Air 187,500 2

Chattanooga CWS 1,250,000 5

Chattanooga Man 10

Chattanooga Supply

Heat recoveryfrom aircompressor

Optimisation ofcompressed airdistributionsystem

Optimisation ofchilled watersystem operation

Implement anenergymanagementsystemImprove powerfactor to elimatekVArh penalty


54/150

$381,690 $145,000$155,243 $140,000$29,998 $0

$17,000 $30,000

$12,000 $25,000

$11,249 $25,000

$74,995 $50,000

$10,000 $10,000

$226,448 $5,000

$111,780

$27,536$5,000

$21,263$0

$65,869 $0

Cost savings,USD


USD


PARapproved?Yes/No

Is the metric forthis initiative welldefined? Yes/No






55/150

$381,690 $145,000 total capital

USD 100,000 ###

USD 15,000 $15,000

USD 11,025 $11,025

USD 35,000 $35,000

USD 28,000 $28,000

USD 17,000 $17,000

Localcurrency

ProjectedSaving (localcurrency)

ProjectedSaving(USD)


56/150

USD 12,000 $12,000

USD 10,500 $10,500

USD 70,000 $70,000

USD 100,000 ###

USD 16,800 $16,800


57/150

Major Issues or challengesName of theperson

responsible forthis initiative



50%, 75%,Finished

Overall Status forthis Initiative: Green,

Yellow, Red


58/150


59/150

Gainesville


60/150

Gainesville


InputsTotal Energy Consumption, GJ 315,964 358,786 0 0% $61,350

Electricity consumption 162,692 209,198


Total Water Consumption, m3 126,792 144,786 46,477 32% $61,350

something that accidentally got erased 2273 $3,000

Water effluent re-use 37879 $50,000

Written water conervation plan 947 $1,250

Cooling tower replace 1894 $2,500

Dishwater replacement 227 $300

Reuse base pellet cooling H20 1894 $2,500

Install driam washout controls 1136 $1,500

Upgrade washing machine 227 $300




Other direct emissions 0 0Total Effluent Discharged, m3 26,285 51,294To WWTP

To municipalTotal Waste Generated, metric tones 5,892 6,221

Waste Disposed 3,541 5,068


Waste Reductions


2007

Costsavings,

USD

Enthalpy Control System project for eachMunters unit to provide conditionedprocess air to 6 Driams. This control willprovide 25% fresh make up outside air tothe Munters and 75% re-circulated returnconditioned air. Current system provides100% outside air which needs to beconditioned. Result of the enthalpycontrol is that the chill water load will bereduced by 50 tons refrigeration per

Driam which totals out to 300 tonsreduced chill water load. Thusly, one277 ton Trane Chiller Yard Unit will beidled through out the year.

KWHreductionneed toquantified

Per P2E2 assessment, assume 5% totalE savings split between electricity andnatural gas

Waste Recycled 2,351 1,152


61/150

y , ,total savings $122,699

electricity cost: 0.06 USD/KWHwater cost 0.01 USD/gallon


62/150


PARapproved?Yes/No


Does your location havethe means of



Date



initiative


Percent completedNot Started, 25%,

50%, 75%, Finishe


63/150

total Capital

O S f


64/150

Major Issues or challenges Overall Status for this Initiative:

Green, Yellow,Red


65/150

Guangzhou

2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 projectdescription

Estimated Energy,Water GHGs or

Percentreduction

Costsavings


66/150

InputsTotal Energy Consumption, GJ 168,144 111,271 1925 3.0% $46,005

Electricity consumption 98,305 65,225 1925 3.0% $44,046


Total Water Consumption, m3 129,852 115,366 5999 5.2%$1,959

Municipal 5999 5.2% $1,959

Well


Indirect Emissions 23,346 15,490Direct NG emisions 0 0Other direct emissions 6,892 4,543

Total Effluent Discharged, m3 112,035 103,829 5399 5%To WWTP

To municipalTotal Waste Generated, metric tones 2,514 2,282

description Water, GHGs, orWaste Reductions

reductionfrom 2007

savings,USD

1. improve efficiencyon chiller systemcondenser; 2. Coolfresh air munter/chillersysteml. Factoryestimates 2.5% energyreduction

Reuse steamcondensate and installlow flow faucets.Factory estimates5.2% reduction

Based on waterconservation, expect5.2% reduction ineffluent

Waste Disposed 1,035 721Waste Recycled 1,479 1,561

total savings $47 964


67/150


electricity cost: 0.59 CNY/KWH

1 CNY= 0.139 USDwater cost0.0089 CNY/gallon

EstimatedCapital

Budgetedfor in

PARapproved?

Is the metric for thisinitiative well defined?



Date Finished orEstimated


Is this "ongoing" or "one

Percentcompleted: Not


68/150

$140,000$140,000

$28,000$28,000

Capitalcosts,USD

for in2008?Yes/No

approved?Yes/No

initiative well defined?Yes/No

have the means ofmeasuring themetric? Yes/No

Estimeted StaringDate

EstimatedFinish date

person responsiblefor this initiative

going or onetime" effort?

completed: NotStarted, 25%,

50%, 75%,Finished

$168 000 total capital


69/150

$168,000 total capital

Major Issues or challenges Overall Status for thisInitiative: Green,


70/150

,Yellow, Red


71/150


72/150

Nairobi

2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description Percent re

Inputs

Total Energy Consumption, GJ 24,793 9,520Electricity consumption 24,793 9,520 Shut offf all non needed equipment to be determined 5% of 200

Isolate compressed air to departments during weekend tbd 5% of 200

tbd 5% of 200

tbd 5% of 200

tbd 5% of 200

Natural Gas consumption 0 0Other fuel consumption 0 0

Re use munters condensate as boiler feed watertbd 2% of 200

tbd 2% of 200

Install exhaust gas economiser to the boiler tbd 2% of 200

2,007 Insulation of all steam and hot water pipes tbd 1% of 200

Total Water Consumption, m3 13,519 40

Municipal Seal all leak points and accurate metering tbd 2% of 200Well

OutputsGreen House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 1,813 696

Indirect Emissions 1,813 696 Assume reduction by 5% tbd 5% of 200

Direct NG emisions 0 0

Other direct emissions 0 0Total Effluent Discharged, m3 0 0

To WWTP tbd 5% of 200

EstimatedEnergy, Water,

GHGs, or WasteReductions

Replace static air losses in the network by repairingleaks

Isolate production areas(air conditioned) fromwarehouse

Introduce Day lighting for warehouse by changing rooftype

Improve oil consumption of main boilers throughefficient burner management

No project conceptualised this year , but intend to keep

NFI

2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 projectdescription


W t R d ti


2007

Costsavings,

USD

EstimatedCapital

t


73/150

Inputs

Total Energy Consumption, GJ 22,073 17,893 447 5% $5,381 0


Natural Gas consumption 16,763 13,727 343 3% $2,765


MunicipalWell


Indirect Emissions 853 669 17 3%

Direct NG emisions 856 701 18 3%Other direct emissions 0 0

Total Effluent Discharged, m3 2,440 2,340

To WWTPTo municipalTotal Waste Generated, metric tones 271 256

Waste Disposed 58 50Waste Recycled 213 206

total savings $5,381 0

electricity cost: 0.09 USD/KWH

Waste Reductions 2007 USD costs,USD

Per P2E2 assessment,assume 5% total Esavings split betweenelectricity and naturalgas

Per P2E2 assessment,assume 5% total Esavings split betweenelectricity and naturalgas

gas cost 0.85 USD/therm


74/150


PARapproved?Yes/No



measuring the metric?


Date


date


initiative


Percent completed:Not Started, 25%,

50% 75% Finished


75/150

total capital

Yes/No Yes/No defined? Yes/No measuring the metric?Yes/No

Date date initiative 50%, 75%, Finished


76/150

Major Issues or challenges Overall Status for this Initiative: Green,

Yellow, Red


77/150

,


78/150

Panyu

2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description Estimated Energy,Water, GHGs, or

Waste Reductions



79/150

Inputs

Total Energy Consumption, GJ 68,341 70,164 3508 5%Electricity consumption 36,324 35,094 3508

Natural Gas consumption 0 0

Other fuel consumption 32,017 35,070Total Water Consumption, m3 181,100 161,135 16114 10%

Municipal

Well


Indirect Emissions 8,627 5,978 390

Direct NG emisions 0 0Other direct emissions 2,230 1,830

Total Effluent Discharged, m3 63,305 53,921To WWTP

To municipal

Site reports 5% energy reduction targetby: 1. Leakage reduction of compressedair; 2.Steam leakage reduction;3.Optimize environmental temp andhumidity in working area; 4.Convertorcontrol in air-compressor; 5.Upgradelights to lower engergy consumptiontype; 6. Air conditioner replacement

Site reports 10% water consumptiondecrease by: 1.Reuse of vacuum pumpwater 150T/Day; 2.Reuse of waste waterfrom purity-water station to water theplant; 3.Install sub-meter for main wateroutlet to measure consumption;

related to energy reduction above,assume same percent reduction inindirect emissions - 5%

Total Waste Generated, metric tones 424 994 50 5%Waste Disposed 165 598 Site reports 5% target in waste reduction 50Waste Recycled 259 396

total savings


80/150

electricity cost: 0.7 CNY/KWH

1 CNY= 0.139 USDwater cost 0.01 CNY/gallon

Costsavings,

USD



PARapproved?Yes/No




Date Started orEstimeted Staring Date


date

Name of theperson



81/150

$101,144 $30,000$95,231 $30,000

$5,913 $20,000$20,000

USD Yes/No this initiative

$107,057 $50,000 total capital


82/150

Major Issues or challengesIs this "on going"or "one time"

effort?


50% 75%


Red


83/150

50%, 75%,Finished


84/150

Plymouth

2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description Estimated Energy,Water, GHGs, or

Waste Reductions


2007


85/150

Inputs

Total Energy Consumption, GJ 180,291 170,233 20,265 12%Electricity consumption 88,186 90,029 Total electrical reduction 20265 23%

Fix Compressed air leaks 81637156

4946


Total Water Consumption, m3 62,876 53,725

MunicipalWell


Indirect Emissions 11,488 11,728 assume 23% reduction 2697Direct NG emisions 4,726 4,097


To WWTPTo municipal

Total Waste Generated, metric tones 2,086 2,402Waste Disposed 1,448 1,830Waste Recycled 638 572

total savings

electricity cost: 0.08 GBP/KWH

1 GBP 1.96 USD

Switch off all nonessential equipment when notneeded and during weekends

Adjust site voltage - turn down tapings on11,000 volt transformer from 432volt 3 phaseto 420v, 3 phase

Costsavings,USD



PARapproved?Yes/No





Date

Date Finishedor EstimatedFinish date


initiative

Is this "ongoing" or "onetime" effort?


86/150

0

$886,537

$886,537 0 total capital

Major Issues or challengesPercent completed:Not Started, 25%,

50%, 75%, Finished

Overall Status forthis Initiative: Green,

Yellow, Red


87/150

Poznan

2005 2006 2007

I t



Waste Reductions


2007

Costsavings,

USD


88/150

Inputs





Well


Indirect Emissions 30,355 21,305 639 3%Direct NG emisions 10,941 8,648


To WWTPTo municipal

Total Waste Generated, metric tones 2,263 1,722 86 5%Waste Disposed 522 426 86

Waste Recycled 1,741 1,295

installation of PowerPurge dessicantdehumidification unit

Waste generationreduction by 5% for2008. Process willconsist of a

combination ofemployee training andsupervision,process/equipmentmodification, betterhousekeeping, andincreased wastesegregation.


electricity cost: 0.29 PLN/KWH


89/150

1 PLN 0.41 USD


Budgetedfor in2008?Yes/No

PARapproved?Yes/No





Date


date


for this initiative

Is this "on going"or "one time"

effort?


90/150

$33,000

$33,000



91/150

Major Issues or challengesPercent completed: NotStarted, 25%, 50%, 75%,

Finished

Overall Status forthis Initiative:

Green, Yellow, Red


92/150


93/150

Santiaga

2005 2006 2007

Inputs



Waste Reductions


Costsavings,

USD



94/150

Total Energy Consumption, GJ 56,733 0

Electricity consumption 14,625 0Natural Gas consumption 41,986 0

Other fuel consumption 122 0Total Water Consumption, m3 7,093 0

MunicipalWell

OutputsGreen House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 1,798

Indirect Emissions 1,562 0Direct NG emisions 228 0

Other direct emissions 8 0Total Effluent Discharged, m3 0 0

To WWTPTo municipal

Total Waste Generated, metric tones 1,136 0Waste Disposed 878 0Waste Recycled 258 0

total savings 0 0


PARapproved?Yes/No


Does your location havethe means of measuring

the metric? Yes/No


Date


date


initiative


effort?


95/150

total capital


50%, 75%, Finished


Red


96/150

Shanghai


Inputs


Waste Reductions


2007

Costsavings,

USD


97/150

p

Total Energy Consumption, GJ 41,293 55,466 10,594 $148,140Electricity consumption 28,066 29,706 Total electrical reduction 10,594 $148,140

358 $9,739

752 $20,289

Heat recovery from air compressors 2,862 $28,405Use high efficiency blow guns 16 $460

470 $2,001

Reduce steam generation pressure 1,923 $19,072Split driam area into two sections 2,067 $47,209

1,466 $14,202

680 $6,763



Well


Indirect Emissions 3,578 7,055Direct NG emisions 0 0

1. Install submeters on electricity andsteam pipe

2. Reduce electric consumption fromMontes Chiller operation

3. Reduce steam consumption onjacket water system

4. Check compressed to eliminateleaks

Reduce pressure of compressed air

lines

Minimize starting and stopping ofproduction lines

Install feedwater economizers onsteam boilers

Improve insulation of steam pipes,valves and fittings

Other direct emissions 921 1,795Total Effluent Discharged, m3 67,030 81,872

To WWTPTo municipal

Total Waste Generated, metric tones 599 857W t Di d 403 573

Run WWTP, reduce BODdischarge into environment


98/150

Waste Disposed 403 573

Waste Recycled 196 284total savings $148,140

$102 825



PARapproved?Yes/No


Does your location havethe means of measuring

the metric? Yes/No

Date Started orEstimeted

Staring Date


date


initiative


effort?


99/150

$102,825

$102,825

$1,082

$0

$27,052$974

$0

$0$16,231$40,578

$16,908


100/150



50%, 75%, Finished

Overall Status for thisInitiative: Green, Yellow, Red


101/150


102/150

Silao

2005 2006 2007

Inputs$99 948



Waste Reductions


Costsavings,

USD


103/150

Total Energy Consumption, GJ 66,104 63,749 4543 7%$99,948

Electricity consumption 33,326 32,552 Total electrical reduction 1979 6% $71,375268 1% $9,666

14 0% $505

62 0% $2,236

1635 5% $58,968

Natural Gas consumption 32,778 31,197 Total gas reduction 2564 8% $28,573

1669 5% $18,599

265 1% $2,953

630 2% $7,021


MunicipalWell



1. Inspect and repaircompressed air leaks

2. Use high efficiency airblow guns

3. Install additionalreceiver tank capacity


1. Install (feedwater)economizers on steamand hot water boilers

2. Improve insulation inboiler house

3. Install an automaticblowdown system

Assume equivalentreduction in electricalGHG as in comsuption -10%



To WWTPTo municipal

Assume equivalentreduction in gas GHG asin comsuption - 13%


104/150

To municipalTotal Waste Generated, metric tones 1,536 912

Waste Disposed 1,099 702Waste Recycled 437 211

total savings $99,9

electricity cost: 1.39 MXN/KWH

1 MXN 0.093 USD

gas cost 12.64 MXN/ThermP2E2 Study info


Silao Steam 1669 463,611 MXN



Silao Air 75,000 MXN

Silao Air 3,900 MXN

Silao Air 18,750 MXN

EstimatedInvestment

Localcurren

Install (feedwater)economizers onsteam and hot waterboilers

Improve insulation inboiler house

Install an automaticblowdown system

Inspect and repaircompressed air leaks

Use high efficiency airblow guns

Install additionalreceiver tank capacity

Silao Man 1863 456,260 100,000Implement an energymanagement system


105/150

$9 300

EstimatedCapital

costs, USD


PARapproved?Yes/No





Date


date


initiative

Is this "ongoing" or "onetime" effort?


106/150

$9,300$9,300

$0

$0

$0

$9,300

$0


107/150


155,232 $14,258

24,621 $2,261

58,550 $5,378

86,250 $7,922

4,485 $412

21,563 $1,981

Projected

Saving(localcurrency)


697,953 $64,108


108/150


50%, 75%, Finished

Overall Statusfor this Initiative:Green, Yellow,

Red


109/150


110/150


111/150

St. Petersburg


Inputs

Total Energy Consumption, GJ 228,795 249,642 34,950 14% $285,457

El t i it ti 87 302 94 830 13 276 14% $221 725


Waste Reductions


Costsavings,

USD

Sit h t t d j t


112/150

Electricity consumption 87,302 94,830 13,276 14% $221,725

Natural Gas consumption 141,493 154,812 21,674 14% $55,852

Other fuel consumption 0 0Total Water Consumption, m3 115,969 103,997 14,560 14% $7,880

Municipal 14,560 14% $7,880

Well


Indirect Emissions 7,915 8,602 assume 14% 1204

Site has not reported any projectsbut has reported that their goal for2008 is to keep electricityconsumption/MSSU equal to 2007levels. Production FOB for 2008 is14% greater than 2007 so assumeelectricity use will be reduced by14% as well.

Site has not reported any projectsbut has reported that their goal for2008 is to keep gas

consumption/MSSU equal to 2007levels. Production FOB for 2008 is14% greater than 2007 so assumegas use will be reduced by 14% aswell.

Site has not reported any projectsbut has reported that their goal for2008 is to keep waterconsumption/MSSU equal to 2007

levels. Production FOB for 2008 is14% greater than 2007 so assumewater use will be reduced by 14%as well.

Direct NG emisions 7,227 7,907 assume 14% 1107Other direct emissions 0 0

Total Effluent Discharged, m3 57,611 73,771 assume 14% 10328 14%To WWTP


Waste Disposed 854 662Waste Recycled 441 333

total savings $293 336


113/150


electricity cost: 1.46 RUB/KWH

1 RUB 0.041 USD

gas cost 6.63 RUB/thermwater cost 0.05 RUB/gallon

Per site, projects include:

Other comments:

Use high-efficiency utilities equipment,

Install manufacturing line of the new generation

Continue with various energy saving initiatives (e.g. dry coolers, timers for lighting in office etc).

Keep current positive trend in Energy consumption despite extensive growth of the production volume in 2008 due to 3 rd stage of the Factory Expans

0



PARapproved?Yes/No





Staring Date

Date Finishedor EstimatedFinish date


initiative



114/150

0 total capital


115/150

0 total capital

ion

Major Issues or challengesPercentcompleted: NotStarted, 25%,

50%, 75%,Finished


Yellow, Red


116/150


117/150

Taipei

2005 2006 2007

Inputs





Waste Reductions


Costsavings,

USD


Isolation of area to keep

cool air


118/150


Total Water Consumption, m3 67,089 30,639 Leakage prevention 6709 22%Municipal

Well



Direct NG emisions 0 0Other direct emissions 1,733 1,962

Total Effluent Discharged, m3 9,868 3,511To WWTP

To municipalTotal Waste Generated, metric tones 1,296 805 285 35%

Waste Disposed 1,095 635 Wrapping materials reus 285 35%Waste Recycled 201 170

total savings $23,716 0

electricity cost: 2.09 TWD/KWH

1TWD 0.0321 USDwater cost ??? Free maybe

related to reducedelectrical consumption,assum 5%


PARapproved?Yes/No



metric? Yes/No


Staring Date


date


initiative


effort?


119/150

total capital


50%, 75%, Finished

Overall Status for thisInitiative: Green, Yellow, Red


120/150

Tarazona

2005 2006 2007

Inputs

Total Energy Consumption, GJ 46,519 28,815Electricity consumption 20,233 15,208

Natural Gas consumption 0 0Oth f l ti 26 286 13 607



Waste Reductions


2007

Costsavings,

USD



121/150

Other fuel consumption 26,286 13,607Total Water Consumption, m3 50,581 38,251

MunicipalWell


Indirect Emissions 2,136 1,625Direct NG emisions 0 0

Other direct emissions 1,831 948Total Effluent Discharged, m3 0 0

To WWTPTo municipal

Total Waste Generated, metric tones 1,452.01 0Waste Disposed 1,338.01 0Waste Recycled 114 0

total savings 0 0


PARapproved?Yes/No





Date


date


for this initiative



122/150

total capital


50%, 75%, Finished


Red


123/150

Toronto

2005 2006 2007

Inputs


Electricity consumption 78,777 85,128 Total Electrical reduction 1582 2% $35,028



Waste Reductions


Costsavings,

USD



124/150

1201 1% $26,592

3. Install HF ballasts 298 0% $6,598

83 0% $1,838

tbd

tbd

tbd

tbd

tbd

tbd

Natural Gas consumption 41,365 42,663 0%Other fuel consumption 0 0


Well

Outputs

management system

2. Implement compressedair leakage controlprogramme

4. Switch off LEVs duringnon-production times

Turn off lights in officeswhen not in use

Shut down equipmentduring down hours

Shut down chiller duringwinter

Install submeters toidentify high energy useareas and developreduction plans

Optimize capacity of chillerwater

Install auto light switchesand programmablethermostats

Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 6,705 7,142 0 0%Indirect Emissions 4,592 4,963 0%

Direct NG emisions 2,113 2,179 0%Other direct emissions 0 0

Total Effluent Discharged, m3 43,480To WWTP


Waste Disposed 1,972 421 Eliminate styrofoam, cansand bottles


125/150

Reduce paper to landfill

Waste Recycled 1,137 408


electricity cost: 0.08 CAD/KWH

1 CAD 0.992 USD

P2E2 Study info


Toronto Man 100,000 CND

and bottles

Eliminate use of plastics insmall ingredient prep

study ways to minimizegum waste to landfill

Study recycling program toid improvementopportunities

Improve segregation ofwastes to optimizerecycling

Investigage recycling ofdust collector powder

EstimatedInvestment

Localcurrency

Implement anenergymanagementsystem

Toronto Air 335,028 -

Toronto Lighting Install HF ballasts 83,080 -

Toronto Process 23,166 -

Implementcompressed airleakage controlprogramme

Switch off LEVsduring non-production times


126/150

$99,200

$99,200

$99,200

EstimatedCapital

costs, USD


PARapproved?Yes/No





Staring Date


date

Name of theperson



effort?


127/150

$0

$0

$0


128/150


100,000 $98,789

ProjectedSaving(localcurrency)


27,081 $26,753

6,715 $6,634

1,873 $1,850


129/150

Major Issues or challengesPercent completed: NotStarted, 25%, 50%,

75%, Finished

Overall Status forthis Initiative:

Green, Yellow, Red


130/150


131/150


132/150

Yorkville

2005 2006 2007

Inputs





Waste Reductions


Costsavings,

USD



Site reports 2008 project to

replace air compressorwhich will save anestimated 1.98 million kWh

l i 096 GJ f


133/150

Natural Gas consumption 28,922 50,933 0%Other fuel consumption 0 0


Well

OutputsGreen House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 9,024 1180 11%


Direct NG emisions 1,477 2,605 0%Other direct emissions 0 0

Total Effluent Discharged, m3 540 174To WWTP

To municipalTotal Waste Generated, metric tones 577 479

Waste Disposed 268 477Waste Recycled 309 2 $50,000

total savings $208,383 0 total capital

- translates into 7096 GJ ofelectricity saved

Based on electricalsavings, assume 11%reduction in indirectemissions

sell dust collectorreclaimed dusts to PullmanSugar rather than giving itto FWS

revenuegenerated

electricity cost: 0.08 USD/KWH


134/150

PARapproved?Yes/No



measuring themetric? Yes/No

Date Started orEstimeted Staring Date


date

Name of theperson


Is this "on going" or "onetime" effort?


135/150


136/150


50%, 75%, Finished


Yellow, Red


137/150


138/150

Chicago

2005 2006 2007

InputsTotal Energy Consumption, GJ 385,107

Electricity consumption 100,422Natural Gas consumption 284,685

Other fuel consumption 0Total Water Cons mption m3 212 417


139/150

Total Water Consumption, m3 212,417Municipal

Well

Outputs

Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 30,674

Indirect Emissions 16,133Direct NG emisions 14,541Other direct emissions 0


To municipalTotal Waste Generated, metric tones 2,979

Waste Disposed 1,541Waste Recycled 1,438

Percent reduction

factory closure 100100

100


EstimatedReduction/savings


140/150

100

100100

100

100100

Dreyfus

2005 2006 2007

InputsTotal Energy Consumption, GJ 82,711

Electricity consumption 50,921Natural Gas consumption 31,790

Other fuel consumption 0Total Water Consumption m3 207 188


141/150

Total Water Consumption, m3 207,188Municipal

Well

Outputs

Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 9,812

Indirect Emissions 8,181Direct NG emisions 1,631Other direct emissions 0


To municipalTotal Waste Generated, metric tones 0

Waste Disposed 0Waste Recycled 0

Percent reduction

factory closure 100100

100


EstimatedReduction/savings


142/150

100

100100

100

00

Cost savings - all values are in USD

Other Totals

AP

Asquith $51,425 $2,709 $54,134Guangzhou $44,046 $1,959 $46,005Panyu $95,231 $5,913 $101,144Philippines $311,019 $311,019Shanghai $148,140 $148,140

Taipei $23,716 $23,716total AP $684,158Baddi $116,812 $116,812Bangalore $66,960 $66,960

Electrical CostSavings

Natural GasSavings

Other EnergySavings

Water costSavings


143/150

EMEAI

Biesheim $0Nairobi $4,700 $2,900 $1,500 $4,000 $13,100Poznan $106,884 $106,884Plymouth $886,537 $886,537Tarazona $0St. Petersburg $221,725 $55,852 $7,880 $285,457Santiga

total EMEAI $1,475,749

Americas

Chattanooga $155,243 $226,448 $381,690Gainesville $61,350 $61,350NFI $2,615 $2,765 $5,381Silao $71,375 $28,573 $99,948Toronto $35,028 $35,028Yorkville $158,383 $50,000 $208,383

Total Americas $791,779Grand Total $2,499,838 $316,538 $0 $81,310 $54,000 $2,951,687

2006 Environmental Footprint SummaryAP

Metric Guangzhou Panyu Shanghai Taipei Antipolo City Asquith Summary

MSSU 180,433 45,070 2,605 19,421 35,220 22,423 305,172

98,305 36,324 28,066 25,420 22,162 29,257 239,534

0 0 0 0 0 17,902 17,902

69,839 32,017 13,227 24,878 6,400 0 146,361

Total Energy, GJ 168,144 68,341 41,293 50,298 28,562 47,159 403,797

0.93 1.52 15.85 2.59 0.81 2.10 1.32

23,346 8,627 3,578 4,452 2,826 6,863 49,692

Electricitypurchased, GJ

Natural Gaspurchased, GJ

Other Fuelpurchased, GJ

total Energy

GJ/MSSUIndirect GHGEmissions, metricTonnes CO2 equiv


144/150

0 0 0 0 0 914 914

6,892 2,230 921 1,733 446 0 12,222

30,238 10,857 4,499 6,185 3,272 7,777 62,828

0.17 0.24 1.73 0.32 0.09 0.35 0.21

129,852 181,100 74,478 67,089 14,343 22,814 489,676

0.72 4.02 28.59 3.45 0.41 1.02 1.60

112,035 63,305 67,030 9,868 8,709 16,373 277,320

15 37 1 0 6 0 59

66 4 0 5 0 37 112

1,020 128 402 1,095 732 575 3,952

1,413 255 196 196 264 259 2,583

Direct Natural GasGHG emissions,metric tonnes CO2equiv

Direct (other fuel)GHG emissions,

metric tonnes CO2equiv

total GHGEmissions, metrictonnes CO2 equiv.

Total GHGemissions/MSSU

WaterConsumption, m3

Water con-

sumption/MSSUEffluentDischarged, m3

Haz wastedisposed, metrictonnes

Haz wasterecyled, metrictonnes

Non haz wastedisposed, metric

tonnesNon haz wasterecycled, metrictonnes

2006 Environmental Footprint summaryEMEAI

Cafosa St. Petersburg Nairobi Plymouth Tarazona Biesheim Poznan Bangalore Baddi Summary

154,288 15,979 80,931 17,945 128,845 176,894 6,703 30,236 611,821

14,625 87,302 24,793 88,186 20,233 119,850 163,601 7,025 15,746 541,361

41,986 141,493 0 92,105 0 158,385 213,221 0 0 647,190

122 0 0 0 26,286 468 0 11,142 33,753 71,771

56,733 228,795 24,793 180,291 46,519 278,703 376,822 18,167 49,499 1,260,322

#DIV/0! 1.48 1.55 2.23 2.59 2.16 2.13 2.71 1.64 2.06

1,562 7,915 1,813 11,488 2,136 2,905 30,355 1,846 4,136 64,156


145/150

228 7,227 0 4,726 0 8,127 10,941 0 0 31,249

8 0 0 0 1,831 3 0 776 2,352 4,970

1,798 15,142 1,813 16,214 3,967 11,035 41,296 2,622 6,488 100,375

#DIV/0! 0.10 0.11 0.20 0.22 0.09 0.23 0.39 0.21 0.16

7,093 115,969 13,519 62,876 50,581 5,134,607 126,191 22,396 71,709 5,604,941

#DIV/0! 0.75 0.85 0.78 2.82 39.85 0.71 3.34 2.37 9.16

0 57,611 0 18,002 0 4,929,222 73,909 4,616 0 5,083,360

0.4 854 0 6 0.01 12 0 0 20 892

0 441 0 2 0 0 18 1 0 462

878 0 15 1,442 1,338 2,628 522 15 41 6,879

258 0 0 636 114 897 1,723 81 0 3,709

2006 Environmental Footprint SummaryAmericas Total

Dreyfus NFI Chicago Toronto Chattanooga Gainesville Yorkville Silao Summary Summary68,556 119,312 68,298 171,684 53,756 23,461 505,067 1,422,060

50,921 5,310 100,422 78,777 75,549 162,692 46,976 33,326 553,973 1,334,868

31,790 16,763 284,685 41,365 192,944 153,272 28,922 32,778 782,519 1,447,611

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 218,132

82,711 22,073 385,107 120,142 268,493 315,964 75,898 66,104 1,336,492 3,000,611

#DIV/0! #DIV/0! 5.62 1.01 3.93 1.84 1.41 2.82 2.11

8,181 853 16,133 4,592 12,137 26,137 7,547 4,857 80,437 194,285


146/150

1,631 856 14,541 2,113 9,912 7,829 1,477 1,674 40,033 72,196

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17,192

9,812 1,709 30,674 6,705 22,049 33,966 9,024 6,531 120,470 283,673

#DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0.45 0.06 0.32 0.20 0.17 0.28 0.20

207,188 3,957 212,417 57,925 138,450 126,792 25,389 40,292 812,410 6,907,027

#DIV/0! #DIV/0! 3.10 0.49 2.03 0.74 0.47 1.72 4.86

18,885 2,440 183,888 43,480 101,841 26,285 540 10,407 387,766 5,748,446

0 0 4 22 2 1 1 2 32 983

0 36 8 0.4 1.57 0 0.40 0 46 620

0 58 1,537 1,950 1,441 3,540 267 1,097 9,890 20,721

0 177 1,430 1,137 687 2,351 309 437 6,528 12,820

2007 Environmental Footprint SummaryAP

Metric Guangzhou Panyu Shanghai Taipei Antipolo City Asquith SummaryMSSU 0

65,225 35,094 29,706 17,156 21,011 22,534 190,726

0 0 0 0 0 11,530 11,530

46,046 35,070 25,760 28,159 6,819 0 141,854

Total Energy, GJ 111,271 70,164 55,466 45,315 27,830 34,064 344,110

#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

15,490 5,978 7,055 3,005 2,679 5,286 39,493

Electricitypurchased, GJ

Natural Gaspurchased, GJ

Other Fuelpurchased, GJ

total Energy

GJ/MSSUIndirect GHGEmissions, metricTonnes CO2 equiv


147/150

0 0 0 0 0 589 589

4,543 1,830 1,795 1,962 475 0 10,605

20,033 7,808 8,850 4,967 3,154 5,875 50,687


115,366 161,135 98,972 30,639 17,512 19,055 442,679


103,829 53,921 81,872 3,511 7,431 11,036 261,600

19.26 25.00 0.71 0.00 0.24 0.00 45.21

128.00 0.36 0.00 0.22 0.00 25.00 153.58

701.74 573.00 572.08 635.00 592.00 290.00 3,363.82

1,432.58 396.00 284.00 170.00 258.00 232.00 2,772.58

Direct Natural GasGHG emissions,metric tonnes CO2equiv

Direct (other fuel)GHG emissions,metric tonnes CO2equiv

total GHGEmissions, metrictonnes CO2 equiv.

Total GHGemissions/MSSU

WaterConsumption, m3

Water con-

sumption/MSSUEffluentDischarged, m3

Haz wastedisposed, metrictonnes

Haz wasterecyled, metrictonnes

Non haz wastedisposed, metric

tonnesNon haz wasterecycled, metrictonnes

2007 Environmental Footprint summaryEMEAI

Cafosa St. Petersburg Nairobi Plymouth Tarazona Biesheim Poznan Bangalore Baddi Summary0

94,830 9,520 90,029 15,208 92,525 114,825 7,166 15,421 439,524

154,812 0 80,204 0 106,676 169,292 0 0 510,984

13,607 0 0 12,668 31,132 57,407

0 249,642 9,520 170,233 28,815 199,201 284,117 19,834 46,553 1,007,915

#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

8,602 696 11,728 1,625 2,243 21,305 1,882 4,051 52,132


148/150

7,907 0 4,097 0 5,449 8,648 0 0 26,101

948 883 2,169 4,000

0 16,509 696 15,825 2,573 7,692 29,953 2,765 6,220 82,233


103,997 40 53,725 38,251 4,460,746 101,159 20,543 52,857 4,831,318


73,771 6,176 4,282,056 58,161 3,152 0 4,423,316

662.00 0.00 6.23 1.77 0.00 0.00 16.58 686.58

333.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.35 0.96 0.00 347.31

0.00 6.24 1,824.00 2,975.00 426.28 29.00 169.65 5,430.17

0.00 0.00 572.00 1,561.00 1,282.00 40.00 0.00 3,455.00

2007 Environmental Footprint SummaryAmericas Total

Dreyfus NFI Chicago Toronto Chattanooga Gainesville Yorkville Silao Summary Summary114,295 198,084 72,524 27,190 412,093 412,093

0 4,166 0 85,128 81,351 209,198 66,754 32,552 479,149 1,109,399

0 13,727 0 42,663 114,424 149,588 50,933 31,197 402,532 925,046

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 199,261

0 17,893 0 127,791 195,775 358,786 117,687 63,749 881,681 2,233,706

#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 1.12 #DIV/0! 1.81 1.62 2.34 5.42

0 669 0 4,963 13,676 33,608 10,724 4,744 68,384 160,009


149/150

0 701 0 2,179 5,845 7,642 2,605 1,594 20,566 47,256

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14,605

0 1,370 0 7,142 19,521 41,250 13,329 6,338 88,950 221,870

#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0.06 #DIV/0! 0.21 0.18 0.23 0.54

0 4,804 0 49,057 113,835 144,786 28,611 44,159 385,252 5,659,249

#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0.43 #DIV/0! 0.73 0.39 1.62 13.73

0 2,340 0 ? 59,364 51,294 174 15,236 128,408 4,813,324

0.00 0.00 0.00 8.07 1.53 3.25 0.00 2.50 15.35 747.14

0.00 41.00 0.00 0.13 1.04 0.34 1.84 0.00 44.35 545.24

0.00 50.03 0.00 413.00 367.74 5,065.00 477.00 699.00 7,071.77 15,865.76

0.00 165.17 0.00 408.00 1,852.68 1,151.96 0.00 210.70 3,788.51 10,016.09

6% Energy reduction achieved through:

Compressed air management and leak detection programs -fixing leaks, reducing loads on compressors, installing more energy efficient compressors, etc.

ChattanoogaPanyuPlymouth 30% of our factories will implement compressed air management programsShanghaiSilao

TorontoYorkville

Steam Management - insulating valves and fitting, repairing leaks, optimizing boiler efficiencies through replacement or other meansinstalling meters for monitoring, etc.

PhilippinesBaddiCh tt 29% f f i ill i l b il d ffi i


150/150

Chattanooga 29% of our factories will implement boiler and steam efficiency programsPanyuShanghaiSilao

Water Conservation via boiler condensate re-usePhilippinesBaddiGuangzhou

Water conservation via other meansBaddi - water recycling, toilet volume reduction 30% of our factories will reduce water consumptionBiesheim - method not givenGainesville - effluent reuse, water urinals, cooling water reuse, cooling tower replacementGuangzhou - installation of low flow faucetsPanyu - reuse vacuum pump water, installation of meters, reuse of water for irrigationTaipei - institute a water pipe leakage program

Waste Reduction -Asquith - method not given 25% of our factories will reduce wasteBiesheim - increasing recycling ratesPoznan - process/equipment modification, employee training and awareness, better housekeeping, better waste segregationTaipei - better re-use of wrapping materialsYorkville - reducing rolling compound usage and better segreation of waste materials to facilitate greater recycling

2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)

Documents

Transcript of 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)