0131389033 ppt08
-
Upload
sevans-idaho -
Category
News & Politics
-
view
357 -
download
1
Transcript of 0131389033 ppt08
CJ 2011James A. Fagin
Pearson Education, Inc © 2010
Chapter 8:Sentencing
CJ 2011James A. Fagin
© 2011 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights
Reserved.2
After completion of this chapter, students should be able to:
Describe the various purposes of criminal sanctions
Understand the insanity defense Describe the purpose of a presentence investigation report
Detail differences between determinate and indeterminate sentencing models
Explain how civil rights challenges have affected the death penalty
CJ 2011James A. Fagin
© 2011 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights
Reserved.3
There are various different reason for punishment
People have many conflicting opinions as to the purpose of punishment
Over a million sentences are handed down by judges annually
This criminal justice system does not reflect a consistent approach to sentencing
CJ 2011James A. Fagin
© 2011 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights
Reserved.4
1. Deterrence2. Incapacitation3. Retribution4. Rehabilitation5. Restorative Justice
CJ 2011James A. Fagin
© 2011 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights
Reserved.5
Punishment should prevent the criminal from reoffendingEffective with law-abiding citizensCorporal PunishmentSpecific DeterrenceGeneral DeterrenceSterilization
CJ 2011James A. Fagin
© 2011 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights
Reserved.6
The only way to prevent criminals from reoffending is to remove them permanently from society
Banishment Transportation Imprisonment
‘warehousing’ or ‘lock and feed’
CJ 2011James A. Fagin
© 2011 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights
Reserved.7
Criminals should be punished because they deserve it‘Just desserts’‘Get-tough’ era of sentencing19th and 20th century prison officials favored harsh prison conditionsThe public expects prisoners to be punished
CJ 2011James A. Fagin
© 2011 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights
Reserved.8
Criminals can be “cured” of their problems and criminality to be returned to society
Views criminality as a disease to be cured
Most believe this is not working given a high recidivism
WarehousingMost rehabilitation today focuses on juveniles
CJ 2011James A. Fagin
© 2011 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights
Reserved.9
Focuses more on victims rather than the offenders. Rehabilitation is often criticized for forgetting the victim
Offender should be made to provide some contribution to the community
Sentences require restitution to the victim
Community service imposed in about 5% of all cases
CJ 2011James A. Fagin
© 2011 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights
Reserved.10
Court arranges for defendant to be examined by a mental health professional prior to trial
As an ‘expert witness’ the mental health professional can testify during trial
Jury must decide if defendant’s mental condition meets the standard for insanity
CJ 2011James A. Fagin
© 2011 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights
Reserved.11
Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1984 Defendant must undergo a ‘civil commitment examination’
Determines whether defendant should be released or confined to an institution
State Courts ‘Guilty but mentally ill’ Jury can find defendant mentally ill, but still commit to a state prison
CJ 2011James A. Fagin
© 2011 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights
Reserved.12
Information gathered about a convicted person
Used by the judge to determine the best sentence
Gathered by probation or parole officer to include: employment history family relations reputation in community prior convictions
CJ 2011James A. Fagin
© 2011 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights
Reserved.13
Victims can influence the judge’s sentencing
Civil Rights advocates consider the statements to be prejudicial and biased
Supporters argue that the harm and suffering of a victim is an appropriate factor for determining the sentence
CJ 2011James A. Fagin
© 2011 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights
Reserved.14
There are two models that govern the practice of sentencing by judges:
1. Indeterminate sentencing2. Determinate)sentencing
CJ 2011James A. Fagin
© 2011 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights
Reserved.15
Sentence may range from 1 to 20 years
Gives judge more latitude and flexibility
Prisoner’s behavior and progress toward rehabilitation affect release date
CJ 2011James A. Fagin
© 2011 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights
Reserved.16
Offender is sentenced to a fixed term of incarceration
Also called ‘flat sentences’ or ‘fixed sentences’
Proponents claim this sentencing format eliminates discrimination in sentencing
CJ 2011James A. Fagin
© 2011 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights
Reserved.17
A strict application of full sentences
Favored by public who believe offenders get off ‘too easy’
Sentencing not left to the judge’s discretion
For example, if the law calls for 2 year sentence for a crime involving a firearm, defendant must serve the 2 years
CJ 2011James A. Fagin
© 2011 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights
Reserved.18
Punishes repeat offenders more severely
Three strikes-and-out law originated in California
Critics believe this creates situations where offenders are receiving disproportionately long prison terms for minor felonies
CJ 2011James A. Fagin
© 2011 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights
Reserved.19
Early parole is not an option
Requires the court to disclose the actual prison time that the offender will serve
Some states require the offender to serve at least 85% of their sentence before eligible for release
CJ 2011James A. Fagin
© 2011 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights
Reserved.20
Capital punishment is an ongoing controversy in America’s history
Abolitionists believe capital punishment to be ineffective as a crime deterrent
Abolitionists also believe government does not have the right to take a human life
CJ 2011James A. Fagin
© 2011 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights
Reserved.21
Furman v. Georgia (1972) U.S. Supreme Court suspended the death penalty
Gregg v. Georgia (1976) U.S. Supreme Court allowed use of death penalty through ‘bifurcated trail’ process
CJ 2011James A. Fagin
© 2011 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights
Reserved.22
Innocent parties convicted
Official misconduct and error
Racial bias
Past exonerations through DNA evidence