€¦ · Web viewOnline appendix 1. Electronic databases used to search English studies: Academic...

Online appendix 1 Electronic databases used to search English studies:Academic Search Premier, All EBM Reviews; Allied and Complementary Medicine (AMED), BIOSIS Previews, CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, EPPI-Centre database of health promotion research (Biliomap), Health Sciences: A SAGE Full-Text Collection, Internurse.com, MEDLINE: In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, ProQuest: Health and Medical Complete, British Nursing Index, Gender Watch, Social Science Journals, Social Service Abstract, Sociological Abstracts, Psychology: A SAGE Full-Text Collection, PsycArticles, PsycINFO, PubMed, Science Citation Index at Web of Science, and Scopus.

Electronic databases used to search Chinese studies:For the Chinese studies, the electronic databases were included: China Journal Net (CJN), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Chinese Electronic Periodical Services (CEPS), Hong Kong Index to Chinese Periodical (HKInChiP), HyRead, Taiwan Electronic Periodical Services (TEPS), and WanFang Data.

Electronic databases used to search unpublished studies or grey literature:Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Academic Archive On-line, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Electronic Theses and Dissertations Service, Clinical trial.gov, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), Digital Dissertation Consortium, Dissertation & theses: A & I, Dissertation & Theses @ Chinese University of Hong Kong, Dissertation & theses: UK & Ireland, Grey Literature Report, Google Scholar, Hong Kong clinical trials register, Hong Kong Institutional Repositories, Index to Theses, MedNar, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), National Library of Medicine Gateway, Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (NDLTD), Open DOAR, PsycEXTRA® - American Psychological Association, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, PubMed Central® (PMC), and the University of York Centre for Reviews and Dissemination.

1

123456789

101112

131415161718

19202122232425262728293031323334353637

Online appendix 2 Information regarding the search strategy in MEDLINE: In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations

Set Search Statement

1. coronary heart disease.mp. or exp Coronary Disease/

2. exp Coronary Disease/ or CHD.mp.

3. coronary disease.mp. or exp Coronary Disease/

4. coronary artery disease.mp. or exp Coronary Artery Disease/

5. Coronary Artery Disease/ or exp Coronary Disease/ or CAD.mp.

6. revascula*.mp.

7. exp Coronary Occlusion/ or exp Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/ or revascular*.mp.

8.exp Coronary Vessels/ or percutaneous coronary intervention.mp. or exp Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/ or exp Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/ or exp Myocardial Infarction/ or exp Coronary Disease/ or exp Atherectomy, Coronary/

9.exp Myocardial Infarction/ or exp Coronary Disease/ or exp Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/ or PCI.mp. or exp Coronary Artery Disease/ or exp Acute Coronary Syndrome/

10. coronary artery bypass.mp. or exp Coronary Artery Bypass/

11. CABG.mp. or exp Coronary Artery Bypass/

12. exp Angina, Stable/ or angina.mp. or exp Angina Pectoris/ or exp Angina, Unstable/

13. myocardial infarc*.mp. or exp Myocardial Infarction/

14. exp Coronary Restenosis/ or MI.mp. or exp Myocardial Infarction/

15. exp Coronary Disease/ or heart diseas*.mp.

16. exp Cardiovascular Diseases/ or cardiovascular.mp.

17.exp Angioplasty, Balloon/ or exp Angioplasty, Laser/ or exp Angioplasty/ or exp Angioplasty, Balloon, Laser-Assisted/ or exp Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/ or angioplasty.mp.

18.exp Coronary Disease/ or exp Acute Coronary Syndrome/ or exp Coronary Vessels/ or acute coronary.mp. or exp Myocardial Infarction/ or exp Coronary Artery Disease/

19. exp Acute Coronary Syndrome/ or ACS.mp.

2

1

234

20.exp Myocardial Reperfusion/ or exp Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/ or exp Acute Coronary Syndrome/ or exp Myocardial Infarction/ or STEMI.mp.

21.exp Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/ or exp Coronary Disease/ or exp Angina, Unstable/ or exp Myocardial Infarction/ or exp Acute Coronary Syndrome/ or exp Coronary Stenosis/ or NSTEMI.mp.

22.1 or 2 or 3 or 4 or 5 or 6 or 7 or 8 or 9 or 10 or 11 or 12 or 13 or 14 or 15 or 16 or 17 or 18 or 19 or 20 or 21

23. patient center*.mp.

24. patient centre*.mp.

25. exp Patient-Centered Care/ or patient centered.mp.

26. client center*.mp.

27. client centre*.mp.

28. client centered.mp. or exp Patient-Centered Care/

29. person cent* care.mp.

30. exp Patient-Centered Care/ or person centered care.mp.

31. person center*.mp.

32. person centre*.mp.

33. focu*.mp.

34. lcoholng*.mp.

35.(individualize or individualise).mp. [mp=title, abstract, original title, name of substance word, subject heading word, keyword heading word, protocol supplementary concept, rare disease supplementary concept, unique identifier]

36. exp Patient Care Planning/ or individual care.mp.

37.(target or targeted).mp. [mp=title, abstract, original title, name of substance word, subject heading word, keyword heading word, protocol supplementary concept, rare disease supplementary concept, unique identifier]

38. persona*.mp.

39. personal*.mp. or exp Personal Health Services/

40. exp Individualized Medicine/ or personalized.mp.

3

41. exp Individualized Medicine/ or alcohol.mp.

42.(alcohol or counseling).mp. [mp=title, abstract, original title, name of substance word, subject heading word, keyword heading word, protocol supplementary concept, rare disease supplementary concept, unique identifier]

43. exp Counseling/ or counsel*.mp. or exp Directive Counseling/

44.exp Motivation/ or exp Interviews as Topic/ or exp Patient Education as Topic/ or motivational interview.mp. or exp Interview, Psychological/

45.exp Patient Education as Topic/ or motivational interviewing.mp. or exp Motivational Interviewing/ or exp Interviews as Topic/

46.(tailor or tailored).mp. [mp=title, abstract, original title, name of substance word, subject heading word, keyword heading word, protocol supplementary concept, rare disease supplementary concept, unique identifier]

47. tailor*.mp.

48. tailored care.mp.

49.exp Patient Care Planning/ or exp Case Management/ or case manage*.mp. or exp Patient-Centered Care/

50. exp Patient Care Planning/ or patient care plan.mp.

51. exp Counseling/ or liaison.mp.

52. patient education.mp. or exp Patient Education as Topic/

53. coach*.mp.

54. exp Patient Education as Topic/ or coaching.mp. or exp Health Promotion/ or exp Self Care/

55. exp Goals/ or goal-directed.mp.

56.exp Health Planning/ or exp Patient Education as Topic/ or exp Self Care/ or action plan.mp. or exp Patient Compliance/

57. secondary prevent*.mp.

58. exp Life Style/ or cardiac rehab*.mp.

59. recurren*.mp.

60. reinfarct*.mp.

61. re infarct.mp.

4

62. lifestyle.mp. or exp Life Style/

63. risk factor.mp. or exp Risk Factors/

64. behavior*.mp. or exp Health Behavior/

65. nurs*.mp.

66. nursing care.mp. or exp Nursing Care/

67. nurse.mp. or exp Nurses/

68. nurse led.mp.

69. nurse led clinic.mp. or exp Nurse’s Practice Patterns/

70.23 or 24 or 25 or 26 or 27 or 28 or 29 or 30 or 31 or 32 or 33 or 34 or 35 or 36 or 37 or 38 or 40 or 41 or 42 or 43 or 44 or 45 or 46 or 47 or 48 or 49 or 50 or 51 or 52 or 53 or 54 or 55 or 56

71. 57 or 58 or 59 or 60 or 61 or 62 or 63 or 64

72. 65 or 66 or 67 or 68 or 69

73. 70 and 71 and 72

74. 22 and 73

75. exp Alcohol Drinking/ or exp Ethanol/ or lcohol*.mp.

76. exp Wine/ or wine.mp.

77. tobacco.mp. or exp Tobacco/

78. exp Smoking/ or smoking.mp. or exp Smoking Cessation/

79.exp Diet, Atherogenic/ or exp Diet/ or exp Diet, Fat-Restricted/ or diet.mp. or exp Diet, Mediterranean/ or exp Diet, High-Fat/

80. food habit.mp. or exp Food Habits/

81. exercise.mp. or exp Exercise/ or exp Exercise Therapy/

82. physical activity.mp.

83. physical inactivity.mp. or exp Sedentary Lifestyle/

84.overweight.mp. or exp Obesity/ or exp Overweight/ or exp Diet, Reducing/ or exp Body Weight/

85. Body Weight/ or Obesity/ or Diet, Reducing/ or weight control.mp. or Weight Loss/

5

86. body mass index.mp. or exp Body Mass Index/

87. exp Overweight/ or exp Obesity/ or exp Body Mass Index/ or exp Body Weight/ or bmi.mp.

88. exp Obesity/ or obes*.mp.

89. blood pressure.mp. or exp Blood Pressure/

90.exp Cholesterol, LDL/ or exp Cholesterol/ or cholesterol.mp. or exp Cholesterol, Dietary/ or exp Cholesterol, HDL/

91. triglyceride.mp. or exp Triglycerides/

92. lipoprotein.mp. or exp Lipoproteins/

93. exp Hypertension/ or hypertension.mp.

94. hypercholesterolemia.mp. or exp Hypercholesterolemia/

95. exp Hypercholesterolemia/ or exp Hyperlipidemias/ or hypercholesterolaemia.mp.

96. exp Blood Glucose/ or blood sugar level.mp.

97. glycemic*.mp. or exp Blood Glucose/

98. hyperglycemia.mp. or exp Hyperglycemia/

99. self-efficacy.mp. or exp Self Efficacy/

100. quality of life.mp. or exp “Quality of Life”/

101. exp “Quality of Life”/ or QoL.mp.

102. exp Mortality/ or mortality.mp.

103.75 or 76 or 77 or 78 or 79 or 80 or 81 or 82 or 83 or 84 or 85 or 86 or 87 or 88 or 89 or 90 or 91 or 92 or 93 or 94 or 95 or 96 or 97 or 98 or 99 or 100 or 101 or 102

104. 74 and 103

6

12345678

Online appendix 3A modified JBI Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument

Record Number _____________________________________________________Author/s ___________________________________________________________Year ___________________________________________________________Journal, volume (issue) , and page number ________________________________ __________________________________________________________________Article title ________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________Country ___________________ Language of publication: English / ChineseReviewer: Primary / Secondary

Included studies RCT □ Quasi-RCT □ Observational □Longitudinal □ Retrospective □ParticipantsPopulation (Age; Sex; Inclusion and exclusion criteria, and comorbid conditions) ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Dropout with reason ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________InterventionIntervention ________________________________________________________Control ___________________________________________________________Duration ___________________________________________________________SettingSetting: ____________________________________________________________Intervention start at: In patient phase / outpatient phase

Clinical Outcome measures

7

12345

678

Outcomes Description Scale/measure

Time for data collection: __________________________________________________________________

Dichotomous data (adherence to guideline or recommendations)Outcomes Intervention Control

Event Total Number Event Total NumberSmoking cessation

Smoking prevalence

Physical activity

Alcoholic use

Dietary compliance

Continuous dataOutcomes Intervention Control

Mean SD Total Number

Mean SD TotalNumber

Exercise

Body weight

Body mass index

Blood pressure

Total cholesterol

Low-density lipoproteins

High-density lipoproteins

Triglyceride

8

Blood sugar

Self-efficacy

Health-related quality of

life

Summary of Narrative Results

Authors Conclusion

Comments

9

Online Appendix 4. A summary of the included RCTsSource Participant Intervention Outcomes Results

10a I=Intervention group, C=Control group, N=Number.★ Completion of study

1

Miller et al. (1988)Miller et al.(1989)Miller et al.(1990)

Country:United States

Year conducted:Not mentioned

Sample size:Miller et al. (1998, 1989,1990)BaselineN=115 I: N=58 C: N=57

Number of patient included for data analysis:Miller et al. (1988)60 days after discharge★N=103 I: N=56 C: N=47

Miller et al. (1989)1 year after discharge★N=81 I: N=39 C: N=42

Miller et al. (1990)2 year after discharge★N=51 I: N=29 C: N=22

Inclusion criteria:Newly diagnosed myocardial infarction.

Start timeIn-patient

No. of sessionNot mentioned

Delivery approachCase Management

Delivery modeNot mentioned

Conceptual frameworkTheory of reasoned action

Survey on smoking prevalenceAdherence toward smoking advice

Adherence toward physical activity advice

Dietary compliance score

- No significant difference between study groups on adherence toward smoking, physical activity and diet at day 60 and at first year after discharge

- No significant difference between study groups on adherence toward physical activity advice at second year after discharge.

- The intervention group had significantly improved adherence toward dietary advice at second year after discharge (p=0.024).

- The control group had significantly improved adherence towards smoking at secondary year after discharge as compared to the intervention group.

-

Source Participant Intervention Outcomes Results

11

DeBusk et al.

(1994)


Year conducted:1998-1991

Sample size:BaselineN=585 I: N=293 C: N=292

Number of patient included for data analysis:Smoking/food frequency score on cholesterol and saturated fat intake180 daysN=585 I: N=293 C: N=292360 days★N=585 I: N=293 C: N=292

Lipoprotein level180 daysN=500 I: N=252 C: N=248360 days★N=585 I: N=243 C: N=244

Inclusion criteria:Acute myocardial infarction patients


No. of session- Maximum 14 nurse-

initiated telephone contacts

- 4 visits to case managerDelivery approachCase Management

Delivery modeFace-to-face with phone follow up

Conceptual frameworkSocial Cognitive theory

Smoking cession as determine by biochemical method

Food frequency score on cholesterol and saturated fat intake

Plasma HDL; LDL; Triglyceride; and TC

Cardiac death rate

- The intervention group had significantly improved smoking cessation as compared with the control group (70% vs 53%, p=0.03).

- The intervention group has slightly lower food frequency score on cholesterol and saturated fat intake as compared to control group(124±84 vs 140±83).

- The intervention group has lower serum LDL as compared to control group (2.77±0.69mmol/L vs 3.41±0.91mmol/L, p=0.001).

- The intervention group had significantly improved TC level as compared with the control group (p=0.001).

- No significant difference in change of HDL or triglyceride level between study groups.

- No significant difference between study groups on cardiac death rate. However, the intervention group showed a slightly higher cardiac death rate as compared to control group (3.8% vs 3.1%).

12

The Source Participant Intervention Outcomes Results

McHugh et al.

(2001)

Country:United Kingdom


Sample size:McHugh et al. (2001)BaselineN=121 I: N=62 C: N=59

Number of patient included for data analysis:Smoking/ body mass index/ blood pressure/ TC/ HrQoLFinal assessment★N=98 I: N=49 C: N=49

Inclusion criteria:Waiting for elective coronary artery bypass grafting.

Start timeOut-patient

No. of sessionFlexible duration

Delivery approachMotivational interviewing

Delivery modeFace-to-face plustelephone enquiry forgeneral advice

Conceptual frameworkTranstheoretical model

Survey on smoking prevalence

Time spend on physical activity per day

Body mass index

Systolic and diastolic blood pressure

Serum cholesterol level

HrQoL (SF-36)

- Significantly improved smoking cessation as compared to the control group (p=0.001).

- Significantly increased time spend on exercise as compared to control group (change in mean values 75.4 vs -30.6, p<0.001).

- Significantly reduced body-mass index as compared to control group (change in mean values -1.0 vs 0.2, p<0.001)

- Significantly decreased systolic blood pressure as compared to control group (change in mean value -9.1 vs 0, p<0.001), and diastolic blood pressure (change in mean value -5.4 vs 2.8, p=0.048).

- Significantly decreased serum cholesterol level as compared to control group (change in mean value -0.7 vs 0, p=0.003).

- Significantly improved all domains of SF-36 as compared to control group (p<0.005)

13


Zhao (2004) Country:China



Number of patient included for data analysis:2 daysN=200 I: N=100 C: N=100

4 weeks★N=200 I: N=100 C: N=100

12 weeks★

N=200 I: N=100 C: N=100

Inclusion criteria:Patients with newly diagnosis of angina or myocardial infarction


No. of session- 5 sessions include:

one in-patient session and four out-patient sessions (2 home visits and 2 phone follow-ups)

Delivery approachTransitional care

Delivery modeFace-to-face with phone follow ups

Conceptual frameworkNot mentioned


Adherence toward dietary recommendations

- Significantly improved adherence toward dietary recommendation from Day 2 (X2=11.83, p=0.003), 4 weeks (X2=20.85, p<0.001), and 12 weeks (X2=7.56, p=0.023) after discharge.

- No significant difference between study groups on adherence toward physical activity recommendation from Day 2 (X2=0.16, p=0.924) and 4 weeks after discharge from hospital (X2=3.53, p<0.171).

- The intervention group showed significant improvement in adherence toward physical activity from 12 weeks after discharge (X2=22.18, p<0.001).

14

a I=Intervention group, C=Control group, N=Number, TC=total cholesterol, HrQoL=health-related quality of life.★ Completion of study

1


Yate et al.

(2005)


Year conducted:Not mentioned


Number of patient included for data analysis:3 months★N=54 I: N=36 C: N=18

6 months★N=54 I: N=36 C: N=18

Inclusion criteria:Patients with myocardial infarction or receivedrevascularization


No. of session2 sessions after week three and week nine of the cardiac rehabilitation program

Delivery approachBooster session

Delivery modeFace-to-face with phone follow ups

Conceptual frameworkSelf-efficacy theory


Exercise frequency and duration

HrQoL (SF-36)

- No significant difference in adherence toward physical activity at 3 months (72.5% vs 50%) and 6 months (51.5% vs 50%) after the intervention.

- No significant difference between study groups in exercise duration (p=0.356) and frequency (p=0.147).

- Intervention provided at clinic was more effective than intervention provided via phone or usual care among those with lower physical functioning score.

15

a I=Intervention group, C=Control group, N=Number.★ Completion of study


Mittag et al.

(2006)

Country:Germany

Year conducted:Not mention

Sample size:Baseline

N=343 I: N=171 C: N=172

Number of patient included for data analysis:Final assessmentN=297 I: N=154 C: N=143

Inclusion criteria:Patient with myocardial infarction, received coronary artery bypass grafting or received percutaneous coronary intervention


No. of session- Four to twelve monthly calls with an average of 10 calls

Delivery approachCase Management

Delivery modeBy phone

Conceptual frameworkCognitive behavioral and health psychological theories


Physical active for an hour

Systolic blood pressure

Serum cholesterol level; HDL

- The intervention group showed significant

reduction in smoking prevalence (11.7% vs

13.3%, p<0.01).

- Significant improvement in physical activities

among males (X2=7.97, p=0.047), but not in

females (X2=2.94, p=0.401).

- The intervention group significantly improved

the systolic blood pressure as compared to the

control group (p=0.04).

- No statistical significant difference between

study groups on total cholesterol level

(p=0.95), and HDL level (p=0.25) after the

16

intervention.


Hanssen et al. (2007)

Hanssen et al. (2009)

Country:Norway

Year conducted:Hanssen et al. (2007)2001-2003

Hanssen et al. (2009)2001-2005

Sample size:Hanssen et al. (2007, 2009)BaselineN=245 I: N=133 C: N=112

Number of patient included for data analysis:Hanssen et al. (2007)12 weeks after dischargeN=225 I: N=121 C: N=104


No. of session- Maximum 6 months after discharge

- Eight follow-up calls- A hotline operated- Patients have rights to terminate the calls earlier than the scheduled period

Delivery approachCase management

Delivery modeBy phone

Conceptual frameworkLazarus and Folkman’s theory on stress, appraisal, and coping

Survey on smoking cessation.

Frequency of physical activity.

HrQoL (SF-36).

- No significant improvement in intervention group on smoking cessation at 6 months after discharged from the hospital (60% vs40.8%, p=0.055).

- The intervention group had significantly improved weekly physical activity at 6 months after discharged from the hospital as compared to the control group (p=0.004).

- No significant difference in all domains of HrQoL at 6 months after discharged from the hospital (ranged from p=0.220 to p=0.951).

- No significant difference in smoking cessation (54.5% vs 53.5%, p>0.999), physical activity (p=0.159) & all domains of HrQoL (ranged from p=0.221 to p=0.838) at 18 months after discharged

17


12

24 weeks after discharge★N=213 I: N=111 C: N=102

Hanssen et al. (2009)18 months after discharge★N=199 I: N=101 C: N=98

Inclusion criteria:Patient with acute myocardial infarction.

from the hospital.

18

a I=Intervention group, C=Control group, N=Number, HrQoL=health-related quality of life.★ Completion of study

1


Cao et al.

(2012)

Country:China



N=300 I: N=150 C: N=150

Number of patient included for data analysis:One months after discharge★N=292 I: N=145 C: N=147

Three months after discharge★N=292 I: N=145 C: N=147

Inclusion criteria:Patient received percutaneous coronary intervention


No. of session2 sessions with monthlyphone follow-ups


Delivery modeFace-to-face with phonefollow-up

Conceptual frameworkNot mentioned


Number of people adhered toward physical activity advice

Number of people adhered toward the alcohol recommendation

- The smoking prevalence was significantly

reduced among the intervention group as

compared to the control group (p=0.021).

- The intervention group had significantly

improved adherence toward the medical

advice on exercise (p=0.012), and alcohol

consumption (p=0.037).

-

19


Patja et al.

(2012)

Country:Finland



No mention about the proportion of

patients exceeded recommended level

at baseline

Number of patient included for data analysis:Final assessment regarding the proportion of patients exceeded recommended level at baseline in achieving targets at primary end-point of study★

Systolic blood pressureN=82 I: N=51 C: N=31

Diastolic blood pressureN=62 I: N=39 C: N=23

Total cholesterol level


No. of session10 to 11 monthly calls


Delivery modePhone follow-up

Conceptual frameworkSelf-regulation theory

Proportion of patients exceeded recommended systolic blood pressure at baseline in achieving targets at primary end-point of study

Proportion of patients exceeded recommended diastolic blood pressure at baseline in achieving targets at primary end-point of study

Proportion of patients exceeded recommended total cholesterol at baseline in achieving targets at primary end-point of study

Proportion of patients exceeded recommended low-density lipoprotein level at baseline in achieving targets at primary end-point of study

- The intervention group had higher

proportion of patients who have exceeded

recommendations at baseline in achieving

targets on systolic blood pressure (47.1%

vs 16.1%) and diastolic blood pressure

(56.4% vs 26.1%) at primary end-point of

study.

- The intervention group had lower

proportion of patients who have exceeded

recommendation at baseline in achieving

targets on total cholesterol (77.8% vs

100%) and low-density lipoprotein level

(75% vs 100%) at primary end-point of

study.

20


1

N=12 I: N=9 C: N=3

Low density lipoprotein levelN=10 I: N=8 C: N=2

Inclusion criteria:Patients with myocardial infarction or received cardiac revascularization


Kasteleyn et al.

(2015)

Country:Netherlands



N=161 I: N=81 C: N=80

Number of patient included for data analysis:Final assessment★N=161 I: N=81 C: N=80

Inclusion criteria:Patient with type 2 diabetes and acute coronary event.


No. of session3 sessions


Delivery modeFace-to-face

Conceptual frameworkBandura’s social cognitive theory and Leventhal’s common sense model of self-regulation

Systolic blood pressureDiastolic blood pressure

Total cholesterolLow-density lipoprotein levelHigh-density lipoprotein level

HbA1c

Self-efficacy (Confidence in diabetes self-care scale)

- No significant improvement between study

groups on systolic blood pressure (p=0.162),

and diastolic blood pressure (p=0.801).


groups on total cholesterol (p=0.378), high-

density lipoprotein (p=0.588) and low-

density lipoprotein level (p=0.735).


groups on HbA1c (p=0.745).


groups on self-efficacy (p=0.179).

21


Vahedian-Azimi

(2016)

Country:Iran




No. of session- Four stages with 10 to 16 sessions

- 21 support-group webinarsDelivery approach

HrQoL (SF-36) - Significantly improved physical health and

mental health summary score at all data

collection time points after the intervention

(p<0.001).

22


N=75 I: N=35 C: N=35

Number of patient included for data analysis:Final assessmentsN=75 I: N=35 C: N=35

Measurement 2 (10 days after the intervention)★N=75 I: N=35 C: N=35

Measurement 3 (3 months after the intervention)★N=75 I: N=35 C: N=35

Eight 3-month follow up session★

N=75 I: N=35 C: N=35

Inclusion criteria:Patients with acute myocardial infarction

Case management

Delivery mode- Face-to-face- Phone follow-up- Web-based education

Conceptual frameworkFamily-centered empowerment model

- Measurement 2 showed significant

improvement in physical health (p<0.001)

and mental health (p<0.001) at 10 days after

the intervention.

- At first year after the intervention, the

intervention group showed significant


and mental health (p<0.001).

- At second year after the intervention, the

intervention group showed significant


and mental health (p<0.001).

23


Park et al.

(2017)

Country:Korea



N=64 I: N=32 C: N=32

Number of patient included for data analysis:Follow up at 6-8 weeksN=64 I: N=32 C: N=32

Follow up at 6 moths★

N=64 I: N=32 C: N=32

Inclusion criteria:Patient with acute myocardial infarction


No. of session10 sessions including:one in-patient session, sevenphone follow-ups (week 2 andthen monthly up to 6 months), aswell as two follow-up counseling(6-8 week and 6 months)

Delivery approachCase management

Delivery modeFace-to-face with phone follow-up

Conceptual frameworkKing’s theory of goal attainment

Frequency in performing health behavior (Exercise; healthy diet; smoking cessation)

Total cholesterolTriglyceride levelLow-density lipoprotein levelHigh-density lipoprotein level

Fasting blood glucose

HrQoL (SF-36)

- No significant improvement between

study groups on exercise behavior

(F=0.696 p=0.502), heathy diet (p=0.301),

and stop smoking (p=0.059).

- No significant improvement between

study groups on total cholesterol level

(p=0.235), triglyceride level (p=0.494),

high-density lipoprotein level (p=0.943)

and low-density lipoprotein level

(p=0.345).

- The intervention group showed significant

reduction in fasting blood glucose after the

intervention (p=0.016).

- The intervention group had significantly

improved the mental health summary

score (p=0.020), but did not identified on

24

a I=Intervention group, C=Control group, HrQoL=health-related quality of life★ Completion of study

1

physical health summary score (p=0.880).

25

a I=Intervention group, C=Control group, N=Number★ Completion of study

12

€¦ · Web viewOnline appendix 1. Electronic databases used to search English studies: Academic...

Documents

Transcript of €¦ · Web viewOnline appendix 1. Electronic databases used to search English studies: Academic...