INLS 623 – D ATA M INING /M ACHINE L EARNING Instructor: Jason Carter.
l GOVERNMENT is week’s ining News …
Transcript of l GOVERNMENT is week’s ining News …
l G O V E R N M E N T
l F I N A N C E & E C O N O M Y
l L A N D & L E A S I N G
page5
Johnson says ANWR action showsAlaska pawn in bigger game
Vol. 20, No. 5 • www.PetroleumNews.com A weekly oil & gas newspaper based in Anchorage, Alaska Week of February 1, 2015 • $2.50
page12
Hecla CEO Baker praises GreensCreek 2014 performance
www.MiningNewsNorth.com The weekly mining newspaper for Alaska and Canada's North Week of February 1, 2015
NEWS NUGGETSCompiled by Shane Lasley
Bokan drilling cuts deeper REEsUcore Rare Metals Inc. Jan. 28 reported that all five holes
drilled beneath the existing resource at the Bokan-Dotson
Ridge heavy rare earth element project in Southeast Alaska
intercepted mineralization with grade and rare earth content
consistent with what has already been delineated. The exist-
ing Bokan resource currently extends to an average depth of
220 meters and the five deeper holes drilled in 2014 cut the
mineralized zone an average of 100 meters below all previ-
ous drill intersections. This confirmation that the REE min-
eralization continues to depth could result in significant
resource expansion at Bokan. A total of 17 diamond holes
(3,960 meters) were drilled at Bokan in 2014. In addition to
the five deep holes, 12 infill holes were designed to upgrade
the existing Bokan resource.
Palmer expansion slated for 2015Constantine Metal Resources Ltd. Jan. 26 reported final
drill results and summarized key advancements of the 2014
exploration program at its Palmer copper-zinc-gold-silver
project in Southeast Alaska. Two of the newly reported holes,
CMR14-64 and CMR14-65, intersected the massive sulfide
electromagnetic plate target of the South Wall zone. Hole 64
cut 4.1 meters grading 0.55 percent copper, 4.98 percent zinc,
21.1 grams per metric ton silver, 0.16 g/t gold and hole 65
cut 11.3 meters grading 0.30 percent copper, 3.95 percent
zinc, 27.2 g/t silver, 0.23 g/t gold along the western, up-dip
edge of the South Wall expansion area. Constantine says the
wide-spaced drilling completed in 2014 has confirmed the
target is developing into a sizeable new zone with excellent
potential for expansion. The third hole, CMR14-67, cut 3.9
meters grading 0.19 percent copper, 5.11 percent zinc, 92.5
g/t silver, 0.37 g/t gold at the Palmer project’s RW zone, a
flat-lying continuation of the nearly vertical South Wall zone
. The company says hole 67 substantially expands the RW
zone footprint, and extends the total unfolded length of con-
tinuous RW-South Wall mineralization to more than 1,500
meters. The 2014 program at Palmer involved 9,796 meters
of drilling in 16 exploration holes and one geotechnical hole.
Constantine says the results from drilling completed in 2010,
2013 and 2014 will be incorporated in a new resource esti-
mate for Palmer to be initiated in early 2015. Dowa Metals &
Mining Co. Ltd. has the option to earn a 49 percent joint ven-
ture interest in Palmer by investing US$22 million over four
years. Through 2014, the second year of its option agree-
ment, the Tokyo-based smelting and mining company has
spent roughly US$10 million at Palmer. Dowa has notified
Constantine of its intent to continue its participation in their
partnership at Palmer, with this year’s
budget and program
scope to be finalized early in 2015.
Senators seek to limit EPA vetoSens. David Vitter (R-LA) and Joe Manchin (D-WV) Jan.
7 re-introduced legislation aimed at prohibiting the
Environmental Protection Agency from pre-emptively or
retroactively vetoing a permit under Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act. The re-introduced legislation, “Regulatory
Fairness Act of 2015”, has been designated S.54. The EPA
previously used CWA Section 404 authority to revoke per-
mits issued for the Mingo Logan coal mine project in
Manchin’s home state of West Vi
rginia. If passed, the
Regulatory Fairness Act of 2014 would prevent EPA from
pre-emptively vetoing CWA permits needed to develop the
Pebble copper-gold-molybdenum deposit in the Bristol Bay
region of Southwest Alaska.
Bumpy road aheadAlaska mining faces ups, downs from low oil prices, budget-cutting moves
By SHANE LASLEYMining News
Plummeting oil prices have put Alaska resi-
dents and Alaska miners in the same boat.
Suddenly, it’s less expensive to top off the tank of
an SUV or a haul truck, but the state budget, fueled
by oil revenue, is teetering on the edge of an esti-
mated $3.5 billion deficit. That’s $10 million a day
for 2015.
“We know Alaska is experiencing a significant
drop in revenue – the price of oil has dropped more
than 50 percent over the past six months,” Alaska’s
new governor, Bill Walker, said during his inaugu-
ral State of the State Address.
While this oil money shortfall will likely gouge
into state-funded projects across the board, from
fundamental programs such
as schools to the most ambi-
tious like building a 200-mile
road to the Ambler mining
district in Northwest Alaska,
Walker told Alaskans and
their legislators that there is
no reason to panic about the
state of the state.
“Some might call this a
crisis – I call this a challenge
and an opportunity,” Walker
said in his Jan. 21 speech. “We have an opportuni-
ty to make impactful and constructive changes, to
challenge the traditional ways of doing business.”
“Now is not the time to sound the alarm my fel-
low Alaskans. Now is the time to pull together; to
make a plan; to sharpen our focus; and to get to
work,” he rallied.
Natural gas pipelineHigh on the list of Walker’s planned initiatives
is bolstering Alaska’s income and lowering
expenses by reducing the high cost of energy in the
state, an agenda item that appeals to Alaska’s resi-
dents and miners.
“This administration will not rest until Alaska is
squarely on track to become an economic power-
house, thanks to low-cost energy that will bolster
and diversify our economy,” the governor vowed.
He envisions a large portion of this low-cost
energy being delivered to Alaskans and world mar-
kets via a large-diameter pipeline that taps vast
reserves of natural gas on the North Slope.
“Under my administration we will finally begin
building the Alaska gas-line to tidewater,” Walker
said.
Companies developing the next generation of
mega-mines in Alaska, such as the Donlin Gold
and Pebble copper-gold-molybdenum projects in
western and southwestern Alaska, respectively,
have already determined that natural gas is the
most economical and environmentally sound way
to fuel their operations, even if it means importing
the fuel from outside of the state.
Donlin Gold LLC – an operating company
equally owned by subsidiaries of Novagold
Resource Inc. and Barrick Gold Corp. – believes
so much in the natural gas idea that it is willing to
invest $1 billion to build a 14-inch diameter
pipeline spanning the 315 miles between tidewater
in Southcentral Alaska and the 40-million-ounce
gold deposit located in the Yukon-Kuskokwim
region to the northwest.
In April, the company applied for a state right-
of-way lease and a public comment period on the
company’s proposal closed Jan. 28.
Donlin Gold hopes to have authorizations in
hand to begin pipeline construction in 2016 with a
goal of delivering natural gas to the mine site by
mid-2019.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, meanwhile,
continues its preparation of an environmental
impact statement for the proposed Donlin gold
mine. The regulatory agency estimates that a deci-
sion on the final EIS for Donlin will be determined
in 2016.
Though the estimated 2020 startup at Donlin is
likely at least three years prior to the most opti-
mistic timeline for completion of a natural gas
pipeline from the North Slope, the companies
developing the mine are not dismissing the possi-
bility of using an in-state source of natural gas.
“There may be an opportunity in the future to
source natural gas from within Alaska,” Novagold
explains on its website.
If Walker’s
vision is realized, it would reverse
the irony of importing natural gas into a state that
has roughly 37 trillion cubic feet of this clean-
burning fuel in known reserves.
In addition to an in-state supply of gas for
l D E V E L O P M E N T
GOV. BILL WALKER
see BUMPY ROAD page 13
PETR
OLE
UM
NEW
S FI
LE
Gov. Bill Walker vows Alaska will begin to build anatural gas pipeline from the North Slope to tidewa-ter under his watch, a development that would like-ly lower energy costs for many existing and futuremines across the state.
This week’s Mining News
The Alaska mining sector is facing some ups and downs in thewake of sliding oil prices and state budget cuts. See page 11.
It’s off limitsFish & Wildlife ANWR plan bans oil development in coastal plain of refuge
By ALAN BAILEYPetroleum News
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has pub-
lished a final environmental impact statement
for the agency’s conservation plan for the Arctic
National Wildlife Refuge. In that EIS the agency
has selected a plan alternative that recommends
that Congress should designate the entire refuge as
wilderness, (see map page 23) including the coastal
plain area, sometimes known as the 1002 area.
This wilderness designation would place the
entire refuge off limits for oil and gas exploration
and development. Land in the immediate vicinity
of the coastal village of Kaktovik would be exclud-
ed from the wilderness designation but would still
require Congressional approval for oil and gas
exploration.
Highly prospectiveThe coastal plain area, an eastward extension of
Land in the immediate vicinity of thecoastal village of Kaktovik would be
excluded from the wilderness designationbut would still require Congressionalapproval for oil and gas exploration.
see ANWR PLAN page 23
An OCS sales proposalNew lease sale plan includes the Chukchi and Beaufort seas but has exclusions
By ALAN BAILEYPetroleum News
O n Jan. 27 the Department of the Interior pub-
lished its draft five-year outer continental
shelf oil and gas lease sale plan for 2017-2022. In
what the agency characterized as “a regionally tai-
lored approach” the plan proposes one sale each in
the Chukchi Sea, Beaufort Sea and Cook Inlet areas
of Alaska. Interior said that it is scheduling those
sales late in the five-year program, “to provide addi-
tional opportunity to gather and evaluate information
regarding environmental issues, subsistence use
needs, infrastructure capabilities, and results from
any exploration activity associated with existing
leases from previous sales.” (see map page 22)
Responsible development“The safe and responsible development of our
Canadian ‘price shock’Bank of Canada cuts key interest rate, calls crude prices ‘unambiguously negative’
By GARY PARKFor Petroleum News
Bank of Canada Gov. Stephen Poloz stunned
money markets Jan. 21 when he lowered
Canada’s trend setting interest rate to 0.75 percent
from 1 percent — a move that none of the 22 econ-
omists surveyed by Bloomberg had forecast.
The central bank explained that it had no choice
at a time when the impact of low crude prices was
“unambiguously negative” for the Canadian econ-
omy.
“We have an oil price shock, which will reduce
the income flowing into Canada and lead probably
to some increase in unemployment overall,” Poloz
told a news conference, describing the rate cut as
“insurance” that could be needed for two years.
Prime Minister Stephen Harper was less
inclined to focus on the wider economic role of
energy, arguing the industry “isn’t remotely the
entire Canadian economy.”
He said there are many benefits to other seg-
ments of the economy, notably manufacturing,
from cheaper oil and natural gas costs, although
the oil-producing regions “are going to face some
pretty significant adjustments.”
Just how “significant” was laid out in blunt
In an order coinciding with thepublication of the draft lease sale planPresident Obama announced that he is
withdrawing indefinitely from future leasesales the exclusion areas that are
specified for the Chukchi and Beaufortseas, including the Hanna Shoal.
see OCS SALES page 22
In updating its short-term forecast, CAPPestimated capital spending will total C$46
billion compared with C$69 billion in2014.
see PRICE SHOCK page 19
Shell Chukchi drilling this yearShell remains committed to drill in the Chukchi Sea this
year, provided the company can obtain the necessary permits
and clear some continuing legal challenges, Ben van Beurden,
the company’s CEO, said during the company’s fourth quar-
ter earnings call on Jan. 29.
“We have retained a very significant capability to be ready
this year to go ahead,” van Beurden said. “And we’ve kept all
our capability in place, tuned it, upgraded it just to be ready
Conoco slowing Mooses Tooth paceConocoPhillips Alaska said Jan. 29 that it is slowing the
pace of investment on the Greater Mooses Tooth 1 project in
the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska.
“We are deferring the final investment decision for
GMT1,” ConocoPhillips Alaska President Trond-Erik
Johansen said in a statement. “The project is challenged by
permitting delays and requirements, as well as the current oil
price development. In 2015, we will continue to shoot seismic
AIDEA buying FNG to move gasAIDEA said Jan. 28 that, in conjunction with Gov. Bill
Walker, it has signed a letter of intent to purchase Pentex
Alaska Natural Gas Co. LLC and its assets, including
Fairbanks Natural Gas.
The Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority
said it would immediately commence due diligence on the
proposed Pentex purchase at the letter of intent price of $52.5
million. AIDEA said that if its board approves the purchase,
the investment would enable it to “effectively advance the
see CHUKCHI DRILLING page 19
see SLOWING PACE page 24
see AIDEA BUY page 19
2 PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF FEBRUARY 1, 2015
Petroleum News North America’s source for oil and gas newscontents
ENVIRONMENT & SAFETY7 Climate action clock running
Canadian prime minister’s chances of holding powerin 2015 seen as tied to his willingness to implementa carbon tax; BC levy model
17 On the move in BC Montney
18 Nikaitchuq primed for royalty reduction
18 Oil sector should see job growth in 2015
19 Walker names new AOGCC commissioner
10 Minor lease transactions in December
17 Chugach, AIX sign supply agreement
17 EPA proposes revised spill response regs
18 DOE cites carbon sequestration success
16 Operations, gas line transition focus
Report from governor’s oil and gas team prioritizes fieldoperations, gas, tax policy, government efficiency,offshore development
10 RCA subpoenas former FNG employee
Upcoming deposition will ask Kirby why he emailedRegulatory Commission of Alaska Chairman Pickett
6 Corps favors Nome for deep-draft port
Proposes dredging to 28-foot depth, expandingcauseway and installing new dock in western Alaska harbor; could take supply vessels
FACILITIES
LAND & LEASING
FINANCE & ECONOMY
NATURAL GAS
GOVERNMENT5 Johnson: Alaska is pawn in bigger game
Anchorage Republican says federal government hasbroken statehood agreement, cites ANWR wildernessdesignation; overreach in OCS
8 Obama orders Arctic coordination group
4 British Columbia caught in shaky LNG outlook
EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION4 Repsol gets three exploration permits
It’s off limits
Fish & Wildlife ANWR plan bans oildevelopment in coastal plain of refuge
An OCS sales proposal
New lease sale plan includes the Chukchi and Beaufort seas but has exclusions
Canadian ‘price shock’
Bank of Canada cuts key interest rate, calls crude prices ‘unambiguously negative’
ON THE COVER
Shell Chukchi drilling this year
Conoco slowing Mooses Tooth pace
AIDEA buying FNG to move gas
D I V E R S I F I E D D E V E L O P M E N T A N D S U P P O R T S E R V I C E S I N T H E A R C T I C & B E Y O N D
U I C U M I A Q . C O MUMIAQ Anchorage 6700 Arctic Spur RoadAnchorage, AK 99518 P: (907) 677-8220 F: (907) 677-8286
UMIAQ BarrowP.O. Box 955
Barrow, AK 99723 P: (907) 852-7447F: (907) 852-6488
Computing Alternatives
Information Technology Professionals
Ph| 907-644-4522Fx| 907-644-4523
[email protected] Silverado Way, Ste. I
Anchorage, AK 99518
• Custom Web, Desktop, &Mobile apps
• IT Business Analysis• Database Design & Modeling• Microsoft Server Maintenance
• SQL Server DatabaseAdministration
• Oil & Gas Risk Assessment and Regulatory Compliance Tools
• Revenue Taxation• Hospitality Systems
WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING SOLUTIONS TO PUBLIC AND
PRIVATE SECTORS
SIDEBAR, Page 23: ANWR and the 1002 area of the coastal plain
PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF FEBRUARY 1, 2015 3
Rig Owner/Rig Type Rig No. Rig Location/Activity Operator or Status
Alaska Rig StatusNorth Slope - Onshore
Doyon DrillingDreco 1250 UE 14 (SCR/TD) Prudhoe Bay Y-32 BPDreco 1000 UE 16 (SCR/TD) Prudhoe Bay PBU D-24 BPDreco D2000 Uebd 19 (SCR/TD) Nanuq CD3-130 ConocoPhillipsAC Mobile 25 Kuparuk 2L-308 ConocoPhillipsOIME 2000 141 (SCR/TD) Kuparuk 2F-22 ConocoPhillips TSM 7000 Arctic Fox #1 Deadhorse, being prepped Nordaq for load out to Smith Bay to drill NordAq Energy's Tulimaniq #1 exploratory well.
Kuukpik 5 Prudhoe Bay Available Nabors Alaska DrillingAC Coil Hybrid CDR-2 Kuparuk 2F-18 ConocoPhillipsDreco 1000 UE 2-ES (SCR-TD) Deadhorse, under contract to Repsol Repsol for winter explorationMid-Continental U36A 3-S Prudhoe Bay AvailableOilwell 700 E 4-ES (SCR) Prudhoe Bay AvailableDreco 1000 UE 7-ES (SCR/TD) Kuparuk ConocoPhillipsDreco 1000 UE 9-ES (SCR/TD) Kuparuk ConocoPhillipsOilwell 2000 Hercules 14-E (SCR) Prudhoe Bay AvailableOilwell 2000 Hercules 16-E (SCR/TD) Mustang location, Brooks Range Petroleum Under contract to Brooks Range PetroleumEmsco Electro-hoist-2 18-E (SCR) Prudhoe Bay StackedEmsco Electro-hoist Varco 22-E (SCR/TD) Prudhoe Bay StackedTDS3Emsco Electro-hoist Canrig 27-E (SCR-TD) Deadhorse, under contract 1050E to ExxonMobil for 2015
Emsco Electro-hoist 28-E (SCR) Prudhoe Bay StackedOilwell 2000 33-E Prudhoe Bay Available Academy AC Electric CANRIG 99AC (AC-TD) Deadhorse , under contract to Repsol Repsol for winter explorationOIME 2000 245-E (SCR-ACTD) Oliktok Point ENIAcademy AC electric CANRIG 105AC (AC-TD) Deadhorse, under contract to Repsol Repsol for winter explorationAcademy AC electric Heli-Rig 106-E (AC-TD) Deadhorse, under contract to Great Bear Petroleum Great Bear for winter drilling
Nordic Calista ServicesSuperior 700 UE 1 (SCR/CTD) Prudhoe Bay Drill Site 11-30 BPSuperior 700 UE 2 (SCR/CTD) Prudhoe Bay Drill Site 3-31a BPIdeco 900 3 (SCR/TD) Milne Point Drill Site MP-E-19 Hilcorp
Parker Drilling Arctic Operating Inc. NOV ADS-10SD 272 Prudhoe Bay DS 18 BPNOV ADS-10SD 273 Prudhoe Bay DSW-59 BP
North Slope - Offshore
BPTop Drive, supersized Liberty rig Inactive BP
Doyon DrillingSky top Brewster NE-12 15 (SCR/TD) Spy Island SP31-W7 ENI
Nabors Alaska DrillingOIME 1000 19AC (AC-TD) Oooguruk ODSN-02 Caelus Alaska
Cook Inlet Basin – Onshore
Miller Energy ResourcesMesa 1000 Rig 37 Mobilized to North Fork to begin Miller Energy Resources drilling this winter
All American Oilfield AssociatesIDECO H-37 AAO 111 In All American Oilfield’s yard in Kenai, Alaska Available
Aurora Well ServicesFranks 300 Srs. Explorer III AWS 1 Sterling, Stacked out at D&D yard Available
Nabors Alaska DrillingContinental Emsco E3000 273E Kenai AvailableFranks 26 Kenai StackedIDECO 2100 E 429E (SCR) Kenai Stacked
SaxonTSM-850 147 Ninilchik Unit, Bartolowits pad Hilcorp Alaska drilling Frances #1TSM-850 169 Swanson River Hilcorp Alaska
Cook Inlet Basin – Offshore
XTO EnergyNational 110 C (TD) Idle XTO Spartan Drilling Baker Marine ILC-Skidoff, jack-up Spartan 151 Furie Upper Cook Inlet KLU#1Cook Inlet EnergyNational 1320 35 Osprey Platform RU-1, workover Cook Inlet Energy Hilcorp Alaska LLC (Kuukpik Drilling, management contract) Monopod Platform, Workovers Hilcorp Alaska LLC
Patterson UTI Drilling Co LLC 191 West McArthur River Unit #8 Cook Inlet Energy
Kenai Offshore Ventures LeTourneau Class 116-C, Endeavor Port Graham Buccaneer Energy Ltd. jack-up
Mackenzie Rig Status
Canadian Beaufort Sea
SDC Drilling Inc.SSDC CANMAR Island Rig #2 SDC Set down at Roland Bay Available
Central Mackenzie Valley
AkitaTSM-7000 37 Racked in Norman Well, NT Available
Alaska - Mackenzie Rig ReportThe Alaska - Mackenzie Rig Report as of January 29, 2015.
Active drilling companies only listed.
TD = rigs equipped with top drive units WO = workover operations CT = coiled tubing operation SCR = electric rig
This rig report was prepared by Marti Reeve
Baker Hughes North America rotary rig counts* Jan. 23 Jan. 16 Year AgoUS 1,633 1, 676 1,777Canada 432 440 590Gulf 53 53 56
Highest/LowestUS/Highest 4530 December 1981US/Lowest 488 April 1999Canada/Highest 558 January 2000Canada/Lowest 29 April 1992 *Issued by Baker Hughes since 1944
The Alaska - Mackenzie Rig Report is sponsored by:
JUDY
PAT
RICK
4 PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF FEBRUARY 1, 2015
Kay Cashman PUBLISHER & EXECUTIVE EDITOR
Mary Mack CEO & GENERAL MANAGER
Kristen Nelson EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
Susan Crane ADVERTISING DIRECTOR
Bonnie Yonker AK / NATL ADVERTISING SPECIALIST
Heather Yates BOOKKEEPER
Shane Lasley NORTH OF 60 MINING PUBLISHER
Marti Reeve SPECIAL PUBLICATIONS DIRECTOR
Steven Merritt PRODUCTION DIRECTOR
Alan Bailey SENIOR STAFF WRITER
Eric Lidji CONTRIBUTING WRITER
Wesley Loy CONTRIBUTING WRITER
Gary Park CONTRIBUTING WRITER (CANADA)
Rose Ragsdale CONTRIBUTING WRITER
Ray Tyson CONTRIBUTING WRITER
Judy Patrick Photography CONTRACT PHOTOGRAPHER
Mapmakers Alaska CARTOGRAPHY
Forrest Crane CONTRACT PHOTOGRAPHER
Tom Kearney ADVERTISING DESIGN MANAGER
Renee Garbutt CIRCULATION MANAGER
Ashley Lindly RESEARCH ASSOCIATE
Dee Cashman RESEARCH ASSOCIATE
ADDRESSP.O. Box 231647Anchorage, AK 99523-1647
NEWS [email protected]
CIRCULATION 907.522.9469 [email protected]
ADVERTISING Susan Crane • [email protected]
Bonnie Yonker • [email protected]
FAX FOR ALL DEPARTMENTS907.522.9583
OWNER: Petroleum Newspapers of Alaska LLC (PNA)Petroleum News (ISSN 1544-3612) • Vol. 20, No. 5 • Week of February 1, 2015
Published weekly. Address: 5441 Old Seward, #3, Anchorage, AK 99518(Please mail ALL correspondence to:
P.O. Box 231647 Anchorage, AK 99523-1647)Subscription prices in U.S. — $98.00 1 year, $176.00 2 years
Canada — $185.95 1 year, $334.95 2 years Overseas (sent air mail) — $220.00 1 year, $396.00 2 years“Periodicals postage paid at Anchorage, AK 99502-9986.”
POSTMASTER: Send address changes to Petroleum News, P.O. Box 231647 Anchorage, AK 99523-1647.
www.PetroleumNews.com
Petroleum News and its supple-ment, Petroleum Directory, are
owned by Petroleum Newspapersof Alaska LLC. The newspaper ispublished weekly. Several of theindividuals listed above work forindependent companies that con-
tract services to PetroleumNewspapers of Alaska LLC or are
freelance writers.
l N A T U R A L G A S
British Columbiacaught in shakyLNG outlook
By GARY PARKFor Petroleum News
The number-crunching on British
Columbia’s chances of becoming a
global LNG player continues against the
backdrop of spreading unease over the out-
look for commodity prices.
A report by Sanford C. Bernstein & Co.
said the province may have to settle for
only two major projects, down from the
revised target of three set by Premier
Christy Clark, which, in turn, is two short
of the total she had originally targeted by
2020.
Now the Bernstein report projects one
project will be on stream in 2021 and a sec-
ond in 2023, starting with Shell’s C$40 bil-
lion LNG Canada venture, followed by the
Chevron-operated Kitimat LNG which
now has Australia’s Woodside as a 50 per-
cent partner.
“Outside of the United States, we expect
continued expansion in Papua New Guinea
and the emergence of new centers in
Canada and Mozambique over the coming
years, assuming costs can be lowered,” the
investment bank said in a note to clients.
Bernstein makes no reference to Pacific
NorthWest LNG, which was once rated as
the frontrunner until Malaysian state-
owned Petronas started juggling its
timetable because of declining oil prices
(which the firm hopes to use to index its
LNG sales deals) and a grim outlook for
construction costs.
However, Clark’s government and some
industry observers remain hopeful Petronas
will sanction the project during the current
quarter.
The Eurasia Group said in December
that British Columbia’s LNG prospects
were increasingly facing commercial chal-
lenges, including an inability to negotiate
sales contracts and construction cost infla-
tion.
Eurasia said that “monitoring both oil
prices and cost mitigation in coming
months will be crucial to determine
whether Petronas could still take its invest-
ment decision in 2015.”
“If not, it will be unlikely that that
British Columbia would see major LNG
production from a mega project before
2020.”
British Columbia, which has a com-
bined capacity of well over 100 million
metric tons a year of proposed LNG
exports, is also casting a wary eye south of
the border where plans are in the works for
exports of 278 million metric tons a year
from the United States, without even fac-
toring in the chances of an Alaska project
going ahead.
The latest spot Asian LNG prices have
dropped below US$10 per million British
thermal units, down 50 percent from a year
earlier because of the efforts to tie contracts
to oil prices, softening demand and abun-
dant supplies, said Citibank.
Citibank analyst Seth Kleinman said
that if LNG prices slide to US$8-US$10,
unsanctioned projects will “look over-
whelmingly uneconomic, with even U.S.
exported LNG to Asia and Europe uneco-
nomical at current prices.”
Bernstein analyst Neil Beveridge was
more emphatic, declaring that most of the
proposed U.S. projects will “never be built”
because of the slump in crude prices, sug-
gesting buyers’ appetite for U.S. LNG will
diminish “as they reappraise supply options
in a lower oil price environment.” l
Citibank analyst Seth Kleinmansaid that if LNG prices slide to
US$8-US$10, unsanctionedprojects will “look overwhelmingly
uneconomic, with even U.S.exported LNG to Asia and Europeuneconomical at current prices.”
EXPLORATION & PRODUCTIONRepsol gets three exploration permits
With a bundle of recently approved drilling permits, Repsol E&P USA Inc. is
ready to move ahead with a three-well exploration program in the Colville River
Delta this winter.
The Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission recently gave the company
permits to drill the Qugruk No. 301, Qugruk No. 8 and Qugruk No. 9 exploration
wells.
In late 2014, Repsol began permitting five wells for a proposed three-well pro-
gram to continue appraisal of its leasehold between the Kuparuk River and
Colville River units.
Qugruk No. 301 would have a surface location almost identical to the Qugruk
No. 3 well and Qugruk No. 3A sidetrack Repsol drilled in early 2013. Its bottom
hole location would head slightly to the north, following a deviation similar to the
Qugruk No. 3A. Qugruk No. 8 would be a vertical well located less than a mile
to the south of Qugruk No. 301.
Qugruk No. 9 would be a nearly vertical well located about a mile to the north
of Qugruk No. 301. Qugruk No. 9 is nestled among six wells and sidetracks from
previous seasons.
—ERIC LIDJI
—A copyrighted oil and gas lease map from Mapmakers Alaska was a researchtool used in preparing this story.
PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF FEBRUARY 1, 2015 5
Anchorage Honolulu Los Angeles
• Commercial Diving• Marine Construction Services• Platform Installation, Maintenance and Repair• Pipeline Installation, Maintenance and Repair• Underwater Certified Welding• NDT Services• Salvage Operations• Vessel Support and Operations
• Environmental Services• Oil-Spill Response, Containment and Clean-Up• Hazardous Wastes and Contaminated Site Clean-
Up and Remediation• Petroleum Vessel Services, e.g. Fuel Transfer• Bulk Fuel Oil Facility and Storage Tank
Maintenance, Management, and Operations
American MarineServices Group
6000 A Street, Anchorage, AK 99518
907-562-5420Deadhorse, AK
907-659-9010www.amarinecorp.com • www.penco.org
By STEVE QUINNFor Petroleum News
Most may see Rep. Craig Johnson as someone
entering his third term as Rules Chairman, a key
leadership post.
But the Anchorage Republican is also entering his
fifth term as a member of the House Resources
Committee. He served as co-chair for the first two
terms, the first with the late Carl Gatto and then with
Rep. Mark Neuman, now the co-chair of the Finance
Committee.
Johnson is back on Resources,
but he’s also a member of the
House Economic Development,
Tourism and Arctic Policy
Committee. The committee has
already had one hearing on House
Bill 1, the state’s Arctic policy bill.
Like most in the Legislature,
Johnson found himself somewhat
blindsided by the Obama adminis-
tration’s decision to withdraw sec-
tions for offshore development and
designate ANWR as a wilderness.
He discussed those concerns with Petroleum News
earlier this week.
Petroleum News: Let’s start with the news from overthe weekend. President Obama announced his decisionto give ANWR a wilderness designation, further remov-ing that area from the prospects of development. Whatwas your initial thought?
Johnson: It’s probably different from most. I’m not
surprised at what this is. This is payday for the extreme
environmentalists that got Obama elected. I think he is
paying them back with this withdrawal. I think that’s
been the target of extreme environmentalists from
inside and outside of Alaska well, since ANWR has
been announced. He is a lame-duck president paying
his debts to those groups. So I’m not surprised at all.
Am I disappointed? Absolutely. Do I think the rule of
law has been honored? No. The contract with Alaska
has not been honored, so once again I’m not surprised
but disappointed it.
Petroleum News: Would you have predicted it?Johnson: You know, I wouldn’t have predicted it. In
light of the battle I think it would cause as a result of
the Senate changing. I thought that might have given us
a stay. Had the Democrats retained control, I think it
would have been predictable. But I didn’t think he
would take it on as an issue with Congress the way it is
now. I don’t know the rules of that body, but to say
there are irritated legislators today would be very much
an understatement.
Look at someone like (House Resources co-chair)
Bennie Nageak is a perfect example of that, and he’s
got the distinction of being the only legislator born in
ANWR.
Petroleum News: Now, he’s one of these people whothe administration believes it’s protecting? Does thatstrike you as odd?
Johnson: That depends on your definition of protec-
tion. If you are protecting people from having a liveli-
hood, from having a job, from being able to educate
their children, from being able to send your kids to col-
lege, then my definition of protection is maybe a little
different from the Obama administration.
I think you give people an opportunity to work, to
utilize the resources. I think that is the greatest protec-
tion, when you don’t need government to do this kind
of stuff. So I think we differ on our definition on pro-
tecting those people
Petroleum News: So if there are not a lot of legaloptions for the Legislature, what do you do?
Johnson: Well, I’m not sure there aren’t legal
options. We are exploring it quite frankly. If there is a
law passed, we want to make sure that we
can as a state have standing in that, so it’s
important that the Legislature continue to
work with the governor to protect the
state’s sovereignty to prevent these things
from happening. We can use the environ-
mentalists’ tack by suing. We actually won
a couple of lawsuits. Now we are in the 9th Circuit
with the ringed seal and bearded seal. This is a little bit
different declaring this a wilderness area.
To me, it’s pretty cut and dried, even though I’m not
an attorney. They violated a contract (ANILCA, the
Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act). We
had a contract with them and they have been violating
it forever — they being the federal government. I think
they are in clear violation of ANILCA and the
Statehood Act. It doesn’t do any good to convey
wilderness. That’s not the reason we are a state. We
were given the lands to fund our government and to
support ourselves so we wouldn’t be a burden on the
federal government. That was kind of the premise. That
was the main objection for voting against Alaska’s
statehood because they didn’t think we would be able
to take care of ourselves and we would be a burden on
the treasury. They are just reneging on the contract.
Honorable people keep their agreement. I’ll just leave it
at that. Honorable people keep their agreement.
Petroleum News: And now you got more news aboutthe feds withdrawing more areas of the Arctic waterswhile opening up sections of the Atlantic. Did it sur-prise you that the administration chose the Atlanticover the Arctic?
Johnson: More federal overreach. I have a prediction
that may or may not come to fruition. I think he may
not veto Keystone and we are the tradeoff. He’s telling
the environmentalists, don’t beat me up on this and I’ll
give you Alaska. I think we are being served up as a
pawn in a much bigger game.
Petroleum News: Still, did you find it surprising the
Obama administration allowed drilling in the Atlantic?Johnson: Yeah, I’m surprised by that. I really don’t
know what to make of this administration. I’m to the
point of being numb. It’s like here we go again. So sur-
prise is probably not a word I would affix to it. It’s a
little curious. The East Coast has got valuable
resources: fisheries that are troubled; recreation oppor-
tunities, probably more so than the Arctic.
Petroleum News: The U.S. takes over as chair forthe Arctic Council in April. There have been concernsthat the Obama administration’s agenda for this leanstoward climate change while Alaska’s leaders wouldprefer an economic development agenda. Given whathappened over the weekend, how do you see it?
Johnson: Anyone who thinks the state of Alaska
could have even a miniscule impact on climate change,
well until we bring in countries like China and until
you get everyone on board, Alaska shouldn’t bear the
burden for the world. If we shut down all
the development in Alaska, it wouldn’t
be a blip on the radar for the climate
change. We can’t be the whipping boy
for the world when it comes to climate
change.
We do happen to be a great fundraiser
for a lot of the environmental groups, because you see a
nice polar bear — even on the release from the
(Obama) administration, I saw a polar bear. To think by
shutting down ANWR, maybe it’s a moral victory, but
it’s empty. It’s not going to have a long-term effect on
the outcome of climate change. Once again until you
bring in the other countries who are burning coal —
dirty coal — it’s just lip service.
Petroleum News: Do you think Alaska will have ameaningful seat at the table to help advance thenation’s Arctic policy?
Johnson: I was hopeful. Quite frankly I was hopeful
that we could have someone from Alaska chair that. We
have very capable people who are involved. Let’s not
forget the only reason the United States is an Arctic
country is because of Alaska. North Dakota although
sometimes seems like an Arctic country but it’s not. So
again the only reason we are an Arctic country is
because of Alaska, and that’s what we’ve been position-
ing for. You’ve seen resolutions from chambers to make
sure we have a seat at the table.
We will have a voice because of the indigenous peo-
ple, but I think it’s important that we be there. To go
back to your original question, I’m not optimistic at this
point. What I saw over the weekend, I think Al Gore
has got a better chance of chairing that Arctic Council.
Petroleum News: OK, looking ahead at the next twoyears, as someone who will have been on the HouseResources Committee for nine then 10 years, what doyou believe the priorities are for the committee?
l G O V E R N M E N T
Johnson: Alaska is pawn in bigger gameAnchorage Republican says federal government has broken statehood agreement, cites ANWR wilderness designation; overreach in OCS
REP. CRAIG JOHNSON
see JOHNSON Q&A page 21
By ALAN BAILEYPetroleum News
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is in
the process of completing a report rec-
ommending an expansion to the harbor at
Nome as a preferred option for a deep-draft
port in Arctic Alaska, Lorraine Cordova,
economic section chief in the Corps’ Alaska
District, told a meeting of the Alaska
Association of Environmental
Professionals on Jan. 20. Cordova said the
Corps has developed what it calls a “tenta-
tively selected plan” for the Nome harbor
expansion — the process for selecting a
port site remains far from complete, with
several reviews of the proposal still to be
conducted.
Harbor expansionThe plan, as currently envisaged, would
entail adding a 450-foot caisson dock to the
existing Nome harbor, demolishing an
existing spur breakwater, expanding the
harbor’s causeway and dredging the floor
of the harbor to achieve a water depth of 28
feet, Cordova explained. The modified har-
bor could accommodate offshore oil indus-
try supply vessels, for example, but would
not be deep enough to take an icebreaker.
The total cost of the development would be
some $207 million.
The Corps has been conducting a joint
study with the Alaska Department of
Transportation and Public Facilities into the
Arctic deep-draft port concept.
Cordova said that the Corps is currently
evaluating options for optimizing the har-
bor depth at Nome. But, although it may be
possible to deepen the harbor for icebreak-
ers, the additional cost of doing this would
probably turn out to be greater than the ben-
efit gained, she said.
Public comment periodThe study report, which should be pub-
lished soon, will undergo a public comment
period. The study team will then review the
comments it receives, looking for “show
stoppers” and making modifications as nec-
essary. The report must then go through
several other reviews, including a Civil
Works Review Board review, a state agency
review and external peer review, before
being signed off by the Corps chief of engi-
neers. The U.S. Congress would then have
to authorize the project and appropriate the
necessary federal funding before the port
expansion could proceed, Cordova said.
Assuming that the water depth in the
harbor would end up being more than 20
feet, the federal government would pay 75
percent of the cost of modifying the harbor,
with non-federal sponsors picking up the
remainder of the cost and the cost of any
new local service facilities associated with
the port, Cordova said.
Minimal environmental impactMichael Noah, environmental resources
section chief in the Corps’ Alaska District
said that the relatively modest amount of
dredge material that would need to be
removed from the harbor could be dis-
charged onto a local beach with minimal
environmental impact. Existing environ-
mental assessments for the placement of
maintenance dredging material onto that
beach and for major modifications made to
the Nome harbor a few years ago would
meet the needs of the National
Environmental Policy Act assessment for
the project — no environmental impact
statement would be required, Noah said.
However, deepening the harbor further, to
say 35 feet, would involve the handling of a
huge volume of dredge material, he said.
A long debateThe question of whether and how to
establish a deep-draft port in Arctic Alaska
has been a subject of debate for several
years, especially as the volume of Arctic
shipping builds up and interest in Arctic off-
shore oil exploration increases, in response
to the multi-year shrinkage of the summer
Arctic sea ice extent. When Shell conduct-
ed exploratory drilling in the Chukchi and
Beaufort seas in 2012, the company had to
use Dutch Harbor in the Aleutian Islands,
hundreds of miles to the south, as its main
logistics base.
The deep-draft port study that the Corps
and the state of Alaska are conducting
resulted from conferences held in 2008 and
2010, and a subsequent planning meeting,
in which Arctic stakeholders brainstormed
Arctic infrastructure needs, identifying
deep-draft vessel support as a top priority,
Cordova said.
In 2012 the Alaska Northern Waters
Task Force, established by the Alaska
Legislature, identified a number of potential
deep-draft port sites.
And a subsequent meeting in April 2013,
involving, among others, people from
Arctic communities, the U.S. Coast Guard,
the U.S. Navy, and the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration, came up
with a long list of infrastructure needs,
Cordova said.
14 possible sitesAs a starting point for the joint study
between the Corps and the state, there
appeared to be 14 possible sites for a deep-
draft port, Cordova said. To narrow down
the choices, the study team applied five
selection criteria: proximity to operations
such as shipping and mining that might use
the port; connections to other modes of
transportation; size of the local population
that might support development on the land
adjacent the port; natural depth of the water
at the site; and navigation accessibility,
bearing in mind wind, wave and ice condi-
tions.
This line of analysis led to just three pos-
sibilities: Nome, Point Spencer and Cape
Riley. Of these choices, only Nome has an
existing man-made harbor. Point Spencer
and Cape Riley are locations with relatively
deep water in Port Clarence, a natural har-
bor to the northwest of Nome, Cordova
said.
However, neither of the two Port
Clarence sites showed a positive benefit to
cost ratio for port development. The team
quickly dropped Cape Riley as an option —
a mine that has not yet started up would
have been the only operation to be support-
ed by a port at that location, Cordova
explained. And, although Point Spencer has
an existing navigation station and airport,
there was a lack of supporting data and offi-
cial support that might have justified this
choice. That left Nome, the location that has
now become the focus of the study team’s
attention.
Three scenariosLooking at the economic justification for
an expansion of the Nome harbor, the team
considered three scenarios: a no-growth
case; a base case assuming the continuation
of past growth rates for the port; and a high
scenario involving use of the port for sup-
port vessels from three offshore oil projects.
And, while the cost of the low case signifi-
cantly exceeded the potential benefits, the
high scenario showed a modest margin of
benefits over costs. On the other hand, there
are many unknowns and much uncertainty
in the potential future use of the port,
Cordova commented.
On Dec. 16 the Corps headquarters
accepted the Nome project as a tentatively
selected plan, thus setting the stage for the
draft study report that the study team is
about to publish, she said. l
l F A C I L I T I E S
Corps favors Nome for deep-draft portProposes dredging to 28-foot depth, expanding causeway and installing new dock in western Alaska harbor; could take supply vessels
6 PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF FEBRUARY 1, 2015
On Dec. 16 the Corpsheadquarters accepted the Nomeproject as a tentatively selected
plan, thus setting the stage for thedraft study report that the study
team is about to publish, she said.
PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF FEBRUARY 1, 2015 7
Proudly Serving Alaska’s Oil & Gas Industry For Over 40 Years
PRUDHOE BAY — COOK INLET• CASING SERVICES
• WELDING AND FABRICATION• DAVIS-LYNCH FLOAT EQUIPMENT SALES
• RIG MAT RENTALS
Tel: 907-563-3550Fax: 907-562-6468www.gbroilfield.com
6300 Petersburg St., Anchorage, AK
By GARY PARKFor Petroleum News
For the Canadian petroleum industry the uppermost
question for 2015, except for the imponderables of
commodity prices, hangs over whether the government of
Prime Minister Stephen Harper decides that its chances of
a fourth straight election victory depend on implementing
carbon reduction promises.
Amid the clamor for action from Harper’s political
opponents and environmentalists, there is a common view
that he has no choice but to deliver
on his promise extending back to
when he was first elected in 2006
and release a plan for reducing
greenhouse gas emissions from the
oil and natural gas sector and stop
waiting for the United States to act.
But Harper, if nothing else, does
not react well to those telling him
what action he should or must take.
His latest message to the carbon
tax advocates occurred in December
when he told the House of
Commons that “under the current
circumstances of the oil and gas sec-
tor, it would be crazy economic pol-
icy to impose unilateral penalties on
the oil and gas sector. With the (cur-
rent price conditions in the industry)
this government will not consider
unilateral regulations.”
Instead, Harper left the impres-
sion that his government will continue avoiding demands
for a comprehensive GHG reduction strategy, opting to
continue its so-called sector-by-sector approach, leaving
the petroleum industry largely untouched.
Prentice hints at breaking ranksOn this issue, however, he could get left behind by one
of his most trusted allies, Alberta Premier Jim Prentice.
In the short time since getting elected premier, Prentice
has hinted he may be willing to break ranks with Harper
and adopt a new approach to energy, the environment and
climate change, including changes to the province’s own
carbon tax on large emitters.
“One of the surest methods of securing Canada’s pros-
perity and the market access we need for all of our prod-
ucts is for the provinces involved to find common ground
on energy and the environment and enforce fair, clear,
well-thought-out rules,” he told the Vancouver Board of
Trade before Christmas.
Prentice later told reporters that Alberta’s tax, levied on
the biggest industrial emitters at a rate of C$15 per metric
ton, needs an overhaul.
The tax has collected almost C$500 million so far that
is earmarked for use on technological advancements to
reduce emissions.
He said a tentative new framework for Alberta’s
approach to energy and the environment should soon be
released, indicating how the province will tackle the sta-
tus quo.
Need to harmonizeEven so, Prentice was adamant that Alberta needed to
harmonize its approach on climate regulations for the
petroleum industry with the Canadian and United States
governments.
“My views and (Harper’s) views have a similarity in
terms of investment,” he said. “As Albertans we want to
be environmental leaders but we are mindful that there
must be jobs and investment in Alberta. Under no circum-
stances are we going to make changes that at a difficult
time may damage the investment climate.”
What steps Prentice proposes are unlikely to be
ignored by Harper, who entrusted the Alberta premier
with three senior cabinet posts (environment, aboriginal
affairs and industry) before Prentice took a top post in
Canada’s banking industry only to return to politics in
2014 when Alison Redford was forced out of Alberta’s top
job.
Paul Boothe, a business professor at the University of
Western Ontario, suggested Prentice holds the key to
Canada’s carbon policy, especially as he seeks a trade-off
with the Ontario and Quebec governments in return for
their endorsement of new crude oil pipelines to Eastern
and Atlantic Canada.
A C$30 carbon tax would give Alberta an opportunity
to “get in front of the carbon issue,” Boothe said.
This may be time to actThe time for Prentice and possibly Harper to act may
never have been better than during the current oil price col-
lapse.
By some estimates every three barrels of oil are respon-
sible for one metric ton of carbon.
As the price of gasoline falls, some observers make a
case that the shortfall in government revenues could be
filled with a direct carbon tax.
Tom Worstall, a columnist with Forbes magazine, wrote:
“The fall in the price of oil means we can impose a sane and
sensible 50-cent gas tax without the pain being too great or
apparent.”
Others, however, suggest that any attempt by govern-
ments to seize that window of opportunity would be instant-
ly viewed as a cynical move and face stiff opposition.
Narrowing the gapIf Harper’s advisers are looking for options, a new
study has concluded that Canada could narrow the gap on
achieving its 2020 GHG targets by adopting the strategies
of British Columbia, Ontario and Quebec, Canada’s three
largest provinces.
The report by the David Suzuki Foundation said those
jurisdictions have shown that Canada could come within
5.6 percent is meeting its emission pledges.
Ian Bruce, the foundation’s science and policy manag-
er, said British Columbia’s seven-year-old gasoline tax,
Quebec’s cap on emissions and Ontario’s phasing out of
coal-fired power plants have all been effective without
harming their economies.
He said the study is not proposing “radical new ideas
... these are proven solutions that work.”
Bruce said the “main obstacle to Canada meeting its
target is a lack of leadership at the national level” and a
reluctance to build a made-in-Canada solution around
successful provincial policies.
British Columbia’s strategy is based on a 7.24 cents a
liter gasoline tax introduced in phases from 2008 to 2012
that the province’s Environment Minister Mary Polack
said has put her government on track to lower GHGs by
33 percent in the 13 years starting in 2007.
At the United Nations’ climate-change conference in
Peru in December, World Bank president Jim Yong Kim
described the British Columbia tax — the first by any
jurisdiction in North America — was “one of the most
powerful examples of carbon pricing.”
B.C. Environment Minister Mary Polak welcomed the
high-level recognition that British Columbia’s “broad-
based, revenue-neutral carbon tax is a successful model
other jurisdictions could follow.”
Refuting claimsNot only has British Columbia refuted claims that car-
bon taxes kill jobs, but the initiatives the province and
governments such as Sweden have taken are quietly gain-
ing support within the oil and gas industry where
ExxonMobil and Royal Dutch Shell have factored in car-
bon prices of US$40-US$60 per metric ton into their long-
term planning, with ExxonMobil publicly endorsing a tax.
Whether that response would carry over to Alberta’s oil
sands sector, where both companies have vast holdings,
has yet to be tested.
Economists agree that the recent trend towards uncon-
strained development of the bitumen deposits cannot con-
tinue indefinitely, given the global supply-and-demand
picture.
But they suggest that a carbon tax would serve as a
prod towards greater innovation, which has never deterred
the petroleum industry in the past, starting with the home-
grown technologies that opened up the oil sands in the
first place and horizontal drilling combined with multi-
stage fracturing that unlocked shale deposits.
A jolt to the established order was indirectly hinted at
by Julie Gelfand, the Canadian government’s commis-
l E N V I R O N M E N T & S A F E T Y
Climate action clock runningCanadian prime minister’s chances of holding power in 2015 seen as tied to his willingness to implement a carbon tax; BC levy model
As the price of gasoline falls, some observersmake a case that the shortfall in government
revenues could be filled with a direct carbon tax.
STEPHEN HARPER
JIM PRENTICE
see CLIMATE ACTION page 8
8 PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF FEBRUARY 1, 2015
Inuvik Gas Limited, the natural gas distribution
company in the town of Inuvik, Northwest
Territories, is requesting proposals for the supply of
liquefied natural gas (LNG).
Interested parties should contact Inuvik Gas to
obtain a copy of the request proposal package.
The deadline for submission of proposals is
February 27, 2015.
For more information, please contact:
Brad Driscoll, General Manager
Inuvik Gas Limited
107 Mackenzie Road
Inuvik, NT X0E 0T0
Phone (867) 777-3422
Email: [email protected]
Notice – Request for Proposals
LNG Supply for the Town of Inuvik
inuvikgas.com
sioner of the environment and sustain-
able development, who warned in 2012
that the Harper government was badly
off course in chasing its target of a cut in
GHGs to 17 percent below 2005 levels
by 2020.
She said the evidence now is
stronger than it was two years ago “that
growth in emissions will not be
reversed in time and that the target will
be missed.”
Using Environment Canada data,
Gelfand estimated that by 2020 GHGs
in Canada’s oil and gas industry will be
27 million metric tons higher than it was
in 2012, easily the biggest growth in
any sector.
To remain within its 2020 ceiling,
the Canadian target is 611 million met-
ric tons a year, but without any inter-
vention that is projected to reach 857
million metric tons.
Gelfand pointedly noted that
detailed, proposed regulations have
been sitting on the desk of successive
environment ministers, but the “federal
government has consulted on them
only privately, mainly using a small
working group of one province and
selected industry representatives.” l
continued from page 7
CLIMATE ACTION
By ALAN BAILEYPetroleum News
P resident Barack Obama has ordered the formation of
an Arctic Executive Steering Committee to coordinate
the implementation of federal Arctic polices across govern-
ment departments and agencies. Where applicable the com-
mittee will also improve the coordination of Arctic policies
across state, local and Native tribal governments, and across
other similar Native organizations; academic and research
institutions; and the private and non-
profit sectors, the president’s order
says.
Chaired by the director of the
Office of Science and Technology or
a designee, the committee will also
include the heads or their designees
of the Council on Environmental
Policy, the Domestic Policy Council
and the National Security Council.
The deputy secretaries or equivalent
officers from a list of 16 federal agencies will also be com-
mittee members.
Long-term valueThe order says that the Arctic has critical long-term
strategic, ecological, cultural and economic value.
“It is imperative that we continue to protect our national
interests in the region, which include: national defense, sov-
ereign rights and responsibilities; maritime safety; energy
and economic benefits; environmental stewardship; promo-
tion of science and research; and the preservation of the
rights, freedoms and uses of the sea as reflected in interna-
tional law,” the order says.
The wording of the order places particular emphasis on
the impact of global warming on the Arctic region, where,
the order says, higher temperatures have led to a dramatic
reduction in sea ice, widespread glacial retreat, increasing
coastal erosion and other impacts.
“The United States has the responsibility to strengthen
international cooperation to mitigate the greenhouse gas
emissions driving climate change; understand more fully
and manage more effectively the adverse effects of climate
change; protect life and property; develop and manage
resources responsibly; enhance the quality of life of Arctic
inhabitants; and serve as stewards for valuable and vulner-
able ecosystems,” the order says.
The new committee will provide guidance and coordi-
nation over the implementation of Arctic policies and plans
that the president has issued, and will also provide guidance
on prioritizing federal activities while the United States
chairs the Arctic Council, the ministerial forum of the eight
Arctic nations. This year the United States will assume
chairmanship of the Arctic Council.
The president’s order also tasks the new committee with
establishing a working group by May 1, 2015, to prepare a
report on overlaps between different government agencies
in the implementation of Arctic policies and to make rec-
ommendations on how to reduce duplication of effort and
how to address any potential gaps in policy implementation.
In the interests of engaging with stakeholders in the
Arctic, including the state of Alaska and Alaska Native trib-
al governments, as well as the private sector and non-profit
organizations, the order requires the new committee to
develop processes to improve coordination and the sharing
of information with these organizations, and for tribal con-
sultation. The committee must identify a federal point of
contact for communication of Arctic matters with the State
of Alaska and with Native tribal governments and similar
Alaska Native organizations, the order says.
Senators commentIn critiquing the president’s order, Sen. Lisa
Murkowski, R-Alaska, commented on the emphasis on cli-
mate change. While the order usefully addresses the need
for coordination across federal agencies, the order fails to
acknowledge the need and opportunities of the indigenous
people of the Arctic and the opportunity to improve the
lives of the people who live in the Arctic, Murkowski said.
“Today’s executive order is a good step forward in
strengthening the coordination of federal agencies on
Arctic policy — and seeks direct input from Alaska’s
Arctic stakeholders — but it is unbalanced in what the
administration’s Arctic priorities should be,” Murkowski
said when the order was released on Jan. 21. “Once again,
the president remains focused on climate change. I agree
that climate change is an issue facing our nation and my
state, but for President Obama and many of his ideological
allies, the plan for the Arctic boils down to two words:
hands off.”
Sen. Dan Sullivan, R-Alaska, expressed similar senti-
ments.
“While I am encouraged to see that the federal govern-
ment is taking steps to coordinate itself in the Arctic arena
— I see this as merely a piece of paper,” Sullivan said.
“With regard to the Arctic, the State of Alaska is not just
another stakeholder as this executive order indicates. We
are the other sovereign. Indeed, the sovereign that makes
the U.S. an Arctic nation. What is troubling about this
executive order is the White House’s continual focus on
l G O V E R N M E N T
Obama orders Arctic coordination groupNew steering committee will coordinate federal Arctic policies across government agencies and improve sharing of information
“I agree that climate change is an issue facingour nation and my state, but for President
Obama and many of his ideological allies, theplan for the Arctic boils down to two words:
hands off.” —U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska
BARACK OBAMA
see ARCTIC PANEL page 10
PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF FEBRUARY 1, 2015 9
© 2015 Fluor Corporation. All Rights Reserved.ADAV115115
www.fluor.com Safety. Integrity. Teamwork. Excellence.
Alaska Office 4300 B Street, Suite 210 Anchorage, AK 99503 907.865.2000
INDUSTRY LEADERGLOBAL EXPERTISE PROVEN EXPERIENCE
Fluor is one of the world’s largest publicly traded engineering, procurement, fabrication, construction, and project management companies. Since 1954, we have built some of the largest and most significant projects in the history of Alaska.
By ERIC LIDJIFor Petroleum News
The state is requiring a former
Fairbanks Natural Gas LLC employee
to explain a personal email he recently sent
to the chairman of the Regulatory
Commission of Alaska.
With a Jan. 26 subpoena, Administrative
Law Judge John P. Wood ordered Patrick
Kirby to appear before Fairbanks North
Star Borough outside counsel in Anchorage
on Feb. 5.
He’ll be asked to explain an email he
sent to RCA Chairman Robert Pickett from
a personal account on Jan. 6. In the email,
Kirby complained about working in a “very
hostile and negative environment” and
made accusations about company officials.
According to a copy of the email includ-
ed in regulatory filings, Kirby wrote, “I was
hired not because of my utility experience
but rather my entire body of work which
provides a lot of credibility with regard to
testifying and so forth. Yet now they realize
I am very independent, I do not lie, cheat or
steal and I will not compromise my princi-
pals.” He added, “If something happens to
me, I would appreciate it if you would fol-
low up. There is a lot of money involved
here and I present a clear present danger to
those who benefit.”
Speaking to Petroleum News on Jan. 27,
Fairbanks Natural Gas President Dan
Britton said, “I have never asked anyone to
compromise their principles nor does
Fairbanks Natural Gas compromise its prin-
ciples. I don’t know what Mr. Kirby is talk-
ing about.”
Britton declined to say whether Kirby
quit or was fired, calling it was a personnel
matter.
Formerly regulatory affairs managerAt the time Kirby sent the email, he was
regulatory affairs manager for Fairbanks
Natural Gas, which made him one of the
witnesses in a rate case currently working
its way through the regulatory process. He
provided initial testimony in support of
Fairbanks Natural Gas’ financial informa-
tion when the utility filed its rate case back
in June 2014.
State regulations prohibit a commission-
er from communicating with parties
involved in pending decisions and require
all communications sent to the Regulatory
Commission of Alaska to be addressed to
the commission as a whole, rather than to
individual staff.
Those regulations also provide guide-
lines for how regulator should respond to
such “ex parte communications.” On Jan. 8,
Pickett responded to Kirby through a third
party — Commission Section Manager
Ann Wilde — and also sent a report about
the matter to his fellow commissioners.
State regulations require both actions with-
in two business days.
The entire correspondence became pub-
licly known Jan. 12, when the commission
posted Pickett’s report, which includes a
copy of the original email, to its website.
The next day, Fairbanks Natural Gas
removed Kirby from the “service list,”
which is a list of individuals authorized to
receive paperwork in an ongoing regulatory
proceeding.
Borough wanted dispositionThat same day, the Fairbanks North Star
Borough asked Fairbanks Natural Gas to
make Kirby available for a deposition, only
to be told, on Jan. 20, that Kirby no longer
worked for the utility, according to a Jan. 23
filing from Kelly M. Helmbrecht of the law
firm Brena, Bell and Clarkson, which is
representing the Fairbanks North Star
Borough. The borough then asked regula-
tors to require Kirby to appear at an upcom-
ing deposition.
Several days later, on Jan. 26, Fairbanks
Natural Gas withdrew the original testimo-
ny Kirby provided in June 2014. Britton
formally added the information to his tes-
timony. l
10 PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF FEBRUARY 1, 2015
large, abstract concepts such as climate
change. But what is most troubling is that
this executive order fails to acknowledge
the need to develop our Arctic resources in
a responsible manner — which is such a
critical issue for Alaska’s future.”
Environmentalist perspectiveSusan Murray, deputy vice president of
Oceana, an environmental organization,
expressed her organization’s support for
what the president is doing.
“Today’s announcement is another
step toward effective stewardship for the
Arctic region,” Murray said. “The presi-
dent is to be congratulated for recogniz-
ing the challenges and opportunities in
the Arctic and for committing to science,
collaboration, and planning.
Coordination is an important and neces-
sary step, and we hope that it results in
better choices for the Arctic Ocean.” l
continued from page 8
ARCTIC PANEL
l N A T U R A L G A S
RCA subpoenas former FNG employeeUpcoming deposition will ask Kirby why he emailed Regulatory Commission of Alaska Chairman Robert Pickett
State regulations prohibit acommissioner from communicating
with parties involved in pendingdecisions and require all
communications sent to theRegulatory Commission of Alaskato be addressed to the commission
as a whole, rather than toindividual staff.
LAND & LEASINGMinor lease transactions in December
Aurora Gas LLC is looking to transfer a small royalty interest in four segments
of ADL 388233 to Apache Alaska Corp, according to the December 2014 lease
report from the Alaska Department of Natural Resources. The lease is on the west
side of Cook Inlet, where Apache and Aurora have previously engaged in small
lease transactions.
Windmill Canyon LLC is looking to transfer a 0.25 percent royalty interest in
some 47 leases in the Nenana basin to Doyon Ltd. The companies previously part-
nered on a Nenana basin exploration venture, along with several other small inde-
pendent companies.
Independent investor J. Andrew Bachner is looking to transfer a 0.1 percent
royalty interest in ADL 391001 to David G. Feddersen and a 0.2 percent royalty
interest in the same lease to Keith C. Forsgren. The Badami unit lease is on the
eastern North Slope.
Rosemary G. Hayes is looking to transfer small royalty interests in five Cook
Inlet leases— ADL 381003, ADL 381201, ADL 381203, ADL 374002 and ADL
378114 — to Cook Inlet Energy LLC. The leases are assigned to the Redoubt unit.
—ERIC LIDJI
page12
Hecla CEO Baker praises GreensCreek 2014 performance
www.MiningNewsNorth.com The weekly mining newspaper for Alaska and Canada's North Week of February 1, 2015
NEWS NUGGETSCompiled by Shane Lasley
Bokan drilling cuts deeper REEsUcore Rare Metals Inc. Jan. 28 reported that all five holes
drilled beneath the existing resource at the Bokan-Dotson
Ridge heavy rare earth element project in Southeast Alaska
intercepted mineralization with grade and rare earth content
consistent with what has already been delineated. The exist-
ing Bokan resource currently extends to an average depth of
220 meters and the five deeper holes drilled in 2014 cut the
mineralized zone an average of 100 meters below all previ-
ous drill intersections. This confirmation that the REE min-
eralization continues to depth could result in significant
resource expansion at Bokan. A total of 17 diamond holes
(3,960 meters) were drilled at Bokan in 2014. In addition to
the five deep holes, 12 infill holes were designed to upgrade
the existing Bokan resource.
Palmer expansion slated for 2015Constantine Metal Resources Ltd. Jan. 26 reported final
drill results and summarized key advancements of the 2014
exploration program at its Palmer copper-zinc-gold-silver
project in Southeast Alaska. Two of the newly reported holes,
CMR14-64 and CMR14-65, intersected the massive sulfide
electromagnetic plate target of the South Wall zone. Hole 64
cut 4.1 meters grading 0.55 percent copper, 4.98 percent zinc,
21.1 grams per metric ton silver, 0.16 g/t gold and hole 65
cut 11.3 meters grading 0.30 percent copper, 3.95 percent
zinc, 27.2 g/t silver, 0.23 g/t gold along the western, up-dip
edge of the South Wall expansion area. Constantine says the
wide-spaced drilling completed in 2014 has confirmed the
target is developing into a sizeable new zone with excellent
potential for expansion. The third hole, CMR14-67, cut 3.9
meters grading 0.19 percent copper, 5.11 percent zinc, 92.5
g/t silver, 0.37 g/t gold at the Palmer project’s RW zone, a
flat-lying continuation of the nearly vertical South Wall zone
. The company says hole 67 substantially expands the RW
zone footprint, and extends the total unfolded length of con-
tinuous RW-South Wall mineralization to more than 1,500
meters. The 2014 program at Palmer involved 9,796 meters
of drilling in 16 exploration holes and one geotechnical hole.
Constantine says the results from drilling completed in 2010,
2013 and 2014 will be incorporated in a new resource esti-
mate for Palmer to be initiated in early 2015. Dowa Metals &
Mining Co. Ltd. has the option to earn a 49 percent joint ven-
ture interest in Palmer by investing US$22 million over four
years. Through 2014, the second year of its option agree-
ment, the Tokyo-based smelting and mining company has
spent roughly US$10 million at Palmer. Dowa has notified
Constantine of its intent to continue its participation in their
partnership at Palmer, with this year’s budget and program
scope to be finalized early in 2015.
Senators seek to limit EPA vetoSens. David Vitter (R-LA) and Joe Manchin (D-WV) Jan.
7 re-introduced legislation aimed at prohibiting the
Environmental Protection Agency from pre-emptively or
retroactively vetoing a permit under Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act. The re-introduced legislation, “Regulatory
Fairness Act of 2015”, has been designated S.54. The EPA
previously used CWA Section 404 authority to revoke per-
mits issued for the Mingo Logan coal mine project in
Manchin’s home state of West Virginia. If passed, the
Regulatory Fairness Act of 2014 would prevent EPA from
pre-emptively vetoing CWA permits needed to develop the
Pebble copper-gold-molybdenum deposit in the Bristol Bay
region of Southwest Alaska.
Bumpy road aheadAlaska mining faces ups, downs from low oil prices, budget-cutting moves
By SHANE LASLEYMining News
Plummeting oil prices have put Alaska resi-
dents and Alaska miners in the same boat.
Suddenly, it’s less expensive to top off the tank of
an SUV or a haul truck, but the state budget, fueled
by oil revenue, is teetering on the edge of an esti-
mated $3.5 billion deficit. That’s $10 million a day
for 2015.
“We know Alaska is experiencing a significant
drop in revenue – the price of oil has dropped more
than 50 percent over the past six months,” Alaska’s
new governor, Bill Walker, said during his inaugu-
ral State of the State Address.
While this oil money shortfall will likely gouge
into state-funded projects across the board, from
fundamental programs such
as schools to the most ambi-
tious like building a 200-mile
road to the Ambler mining
district in Northwest Alaska,
Walker told Alaskans and
their legislators that there is
no reason to panic about the
state of the state.
“Some might call this a
crisis – I call this a challenge
and an opportunity,” Walker
said in his Jan. 21 speech. “We have an opportuni-
ty to make impactful and constructive changes, to
challenge the traditional ways of doing business.”
“Now is not the time to sound the alarm my fel-
low Alaskans. Now is the time to pull together; to
make a plan; to sharpen our focus; and to get to
work,” he rallied.
Natural gas pipelineHigh on the list of Walker’s planned initiatives
is bolstering Alaska’s income and lowering
expenses by reducing the high cost of energy in the
state, an agenda item that appeals to Alaska’s resi-
dents and miners.
“This administration will not rest until Alaska is
squarely on track to become an economic power-
house, thanks to low-cost energy that will bolster
and diversify our economy,” the governor vowed.
He envisions a large portion of this low-cost
energy being delivered to Alaskans and world mar-
kets via a large-diameter pipeline that taps vast
reserves of natural gas on the North Slope.
“Under my administration we will finally begin
building the Alaska gas-line to tidewater,” Walker
said.
Companies developing the next generation of
mega-mines in Alaska, such as the Donlin Gold
and Pebble copper-gold-molybdenum projects in
western and southwestern Alaska, respectively,
have already determined that natural gas is the
most economical and environmentally sound way
to fuel their operations, even if it means importing
the fuel from outside of the state.
Donlin Gold LLC – an operating company
equally owned by subsidiaries of Novagold
Resource Inc. and Barrick Gold Corp. – believes
so much in the natural gas idea that it is willing to
invest $1 billion to build a 14-inch diameter
pipeline spanning the 315 miles between tidewater
in Southcentral Alaska and the 40-million-ounce
gold deposit located in the Yukon-Kuskokwim
region to the northwest.
In April, the company applied for a state right-
of-way lease and a public comment period on the
company’s proposal closed Jan. 28.
Donlin Gold hopes to have authorizations in
hand to begin pipeline construction in 2016 with a
goal of delivering natural gas to the mine site by
mid-2019.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, meanwhile,
continues its preparation of an environmental
impact statement for the proposed Donlin gold
mine. The regulatory agency estimates that a deci-
sion on the final EIS for Donlin will be determined
in 2016.
Though the estimated 2020 startup at Donlin is
likely at least three years prior to the most opti-
mistic timeline for completion of a natural gas
pipeline from the North Slope, the companies
developing the mine are not dismissing the possi-
bility of using an in-state source of natural gas.
“There may be an opportunity in the future to
source natural gas from within Alaska,” Novagold
explains on its website.
If Walker’s vision is realized, it would reverse
the irony of importing natural gas into a state that
has roughly 37 trillion cubic feet of this clean-
burning fuel in known reserves.
In addition to an in-state supply of gas for
l D E V E L O P M E N T
GOV. BILL WALKER
see BUMPY ROAD page 13
PETR
OLE
UM
NEW
S FI
LE
Gov. Bill Walker vows Alaska will begin to build anatural gas pipeline from the North Slope to tidewa-ter under his watch, a development that would like-ly lower energy costs for many existing and futuremines across the state.
12NORTH OF 60 MINING PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF FEBRUARY 1, 2015
Shane Lasley PUBLISHER & NEWS EDITOR
Rose Ragsdale EDITOR-IN-CHIEF (contractor)
Mary Mack CEO & GENERAL MANAGER
Susan Crane ADVERTISING DIRECTOR
Heather Yates BOOKKEEPER
Bonnie Yonker AK / INTERNATIONAL ADVERTISING
Marti Reeve SPECIAL PUBLICATIONS DIRECTOR
Steven Merritt PRODUCTION DIRECTOR
Curt Freeman COLUMNIST
J.P. Tangen COLUMNIST
Judy Patrick Photography CONTRACT PHOTOGRAPHER
Forrest Crane CONTRACT PHOTOGRAPHER
Tom Kearney ADVERTISING DESIGN MANAGER
Renee Garbutt CIRCULATION MANAGER
Mapmakers Alaska CARTOGRAPHY
ADDRESS • P.O. Box 231647Anchorage, AK 99523-1647
NEWS • [email protected]
CIRCULATION • 907.522.9469 [email protected]
ADVERTISING Susan Crane • [email protected] Yonker • [email protected]
FAX FOR ALL DEPARTMENTS907.522.9583
NORTH OF 60 MINING NEWS is a weekly supplement of Petroleum News,a weekly newspaper. To subscribe to North of 60 Mining News,
call (907) 522-9469 or sign-up online at www.miningnewsnorth.com.
Several of the individualslisted above are
independent contractors
North of 60 Mining News is a weekly supplement of the weeklynewspaper, Petroleum News.
NORTHERN NEIGHBORSCompiled by Shane Lasley
BRITISH COLUMBIA PREMIER CHRISTY CLARK Jan. 26 unveiled C$9
million in new funding to support mining in the province. Clark said the
funds will establish a MAJOR MINES PERMITTING OFFICE to improve
coordination of major mine permits across government, add staff to conduct
more inspections and permit reviews, and maintain improved turnaround
times for notice of work permits. The base budget of the ministry will be
increased by about C$6 million, including a portion to make current contin-
gency funding permanent. New permit fees for producing
mines in B.C. are expected to raise an additional C$3
million annually. The premier said the C$10 million min-
ing flow-through share tax credit program has been
extended to year’s end 2015 to support mining explo-
ration investment. To further encourage exploration, she
also committed to extending the province’s new mine
allowance to 2020. The tax credit combines with other
mineral tax provisions to support new mines and major
expansions by allowing them to deduct 133 percent of
their capital costs. Exploration expenditures in British
Columbia for 2014 are estimated to total C$338 million.
In 2013, comparable spending represented more than 21 percent of all mineral
exploration in Canada. This is a substantial increase from 2001 when B. C.
accounted for just six percent of the nation’s exploration expenditures. “Up to
10 new mines are expected to proceed in the next few years and this new
funding will make sure we are ready to support these projects and ensure the
safety of this important industry as it continues to grow,” said Premier Clark.
SEABRIDGE GOLD Jan. 26 said an independent geotechnical review board
will consider the KSM project’s tailings management facility and water stor-
age dam with a focus on structural stability and integrity. The review board is
charged with providing independent, expert oversight, opinion and advice to
Seabridge on the design, construction, management and closure of the tailings
facility and water dam. Seabridge said this eight-person panel will have unim-
peded access to all technical data necessary to enable them to assess the tail-
ings facility and water dam at KSM on an ongoing basis to ensure that these
structures meet internationally accepted standards and practices. Members of
the review board include a co-founder of SRK CONSULTING, an award-win-
ning civil engineer; a principal of GOLDER ASSOCIATES; and the director
for Québec of the CANADIAN DAM ASSOCIATION.
ROCKHAVEN RESOURCES Jan. 26 reported a maiden inferred mineral
resource estimate of 7.04 million metric tons averaging 4.19 grams per metric
ton (948,348 ounces) gold and 96.23 g/t (21.78 million ounces) silver for its
Klaza property in southern Yukon Territory. The resource also includes 144.3
million pounds of zinc, 121.1 million lbs. lead and 14 million lbs. copper. The
estimated 1.31 million-ounce gold-equivalent resource encompasses drill
Alaska Mental Health Trust Land Office VacancyMinerals-Energy Section Chief – Anchorage, Alaska
The Alaska Mental Health Trust Land Office within the Alaska Department of Natural Resources is recruiting for a Minerals-Energy Section Chief. This is a fully exempt, professional position with a starting salary up to $121,000 annually. Final salary will be negotiated at the time of hire and will be based upon the successful candidates’ qualifications and experience. The position is located in Anchorage, Alaska and is offered with a complete State of Alaska benefit package.
As part of a dynamic team dedicated to the development and management of approximately one million acres of Alaska Mental Health Trust Land, the Minerals-Energy Section Chief will oversee and direct the marketing, analysis and administration of programs for the development of the Trust’s mineral and energy resources.
For a complete list of position requirements, responsibilities and how to apply, view the Trust Land Office website at www.mhtrustland.org.
The State of Alaska is an equal employment opportunity employer and supports workplace diver-sity. Individuals requiring accommodation should call 800-587-0430 V/800-770-8973 TTY/TDD (Relay Alaska).
l E X P L O R A T I O N & P R O D U C T I O N
Mine eyes next decade, beyondGreens Creek replaces reserves, plans tailings expansion projectand pledges financial security for perpetual water treatment
By ROSE RAGSDALEFor Mining News
Greens Creek Mine is preparing for the
next stage of its long-running tenure
as a low-cost primary silver producing mine
in Southeast Alaska.
The underground mine, located on
Admiralty Island about 18 miles southwest
of Juneau, extracts ore from a volcanogenic
massive sulphide deposit with an unusually
high silver content. The mine produces sil-
ver, along with zinc, lead and gold as by-
products.
Idaho-based Hecla
Mining Co. owns the
mine, which has
operated for most of
the quarter-century
since its operations
began in 1989.
Drilling efforts
over the past 10 years
have replaced pro-
duction and added new reserves and
resources. Exploration efforts are ongoing
along the trend of numerous orebodies
underground and aggressively exploring the
highly prospective 27-square-mile land
package on surface. Underground drilling
efforts this year are looking to convert
resources to reserves and define extensions
to the 200 South, Southwest Bench and
NNW. Surface drilling at Killer Creek may
define a new mineralizing center at Greens
Creek.
In 2014, Hecla carried out significant
exploration that is expected to boost the
mine’s resource and reserves.
Hecla President and CEO Phillips S.
Baker Jr. told industry analysts recently
that Greens Creek continued its “solid,
low-cost, consistent cash-generating per-
formance” in 2014.
“At Greens Creek, we continue to deliv-
er high-grade drill intersections that should
add resources all along the Southwest
bench, 200 South, and Deep 200 South
Gallagher Fault Block trends, as shown in
slide 25; and upgrade resources to reserves
at the Northwest West, West Wall zones,
Central West, and Deep 200 South trends.
In the next quarter, we expect to complete
more exploration and definition drilling in
these areas, which should boost resources
and reserves and continue to extend mine
life,” Baker said during a teleconference in
November.
Deep 200 South had some of the widest
and highest grade intercepts in recent histo-
ry at the mine and include 48.0 oz/ton sil-
ver, 0.07 oz/ton gold, 6.6 percent zinc and
3.3 percent lead over 26.7 feet and 32.5
oz/ton silver, 0.46 oz/ton gold, 17.0 percent
zinc and 7.3 percent lead over 35.0 feet.
Similar southward trending mineralization
remains open along the 5250 and Gallagher
trends, and the Southwest Bench and
Northwest-West zones are open to the
southwest.
Greens Creek holds current proven and
probable silver reserves of 92.5 million
ounces, 713,000 ounces of proven and
probable gold reserves, as well as 256,130
tons of lead and 677,940 tons of zinc in
proven and probable reserves.
There are an additional 9.4 million
ounces of silver measured and indicated
resources and 31.8 million ounces of silver
inferred resources. Measured and indicated
gold resources measure 72,000 ounces and
inferred gold resources measure 216,000
ounces.
To facilitate at least another decade of
production at Greens Creek, Hecla is plan-
ning a $30 million expansion of the mine’s
tailings plant to be built in 2015 and 2016.
Luke Russell, Hecla’s vice president of
external and environmental affairs, said the
company has secured the final permit need-
ed for the two-year tailings facility expan-
sion, which will cover 18 additional acres.
Perpetual water treatmentAt Greens Creek, all mine water and
water used in the milling process is treated
in water treatment plants and then released
into Hawk Inlet under strict specific dis-
charge permit limits. The need for water
treatment sometimes results when certain
types of mineral deposits, such as massive
PHILLIPS S. BAKER JR.
see GREENS CREEK page 14
CHRISTY CLARK
see NORTHERN NEIGHBORS page 14
SHA
NE
LASL
EY
13NORTH OF 60 MINING
PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF FEBRUARY 1, 2015
Donlin, the governor’s push to get North
Slope natural gas to market could reduce
the notoriously high power costs for
existing Interior Alaska gold mines such
as Fort Knox and Pogo and improve eco-
nomics of the region’s potential future
mines such as Livengood gold and Globe
Creek limestone.
Alaska’s operating mines and other
industries, meanwhile, are already bene-
fitting from lower fuel prices resulting
from less than US$50 per barrel oil.
Globe Creek limestoneIn addition to building a parallel natural
gas pipeline, Gov. Walker’s ideas for boost-
ing Alaska’s income, understandably, are
focused on getting more oil flowing
through the 800-mile trans-Alaska pipeline,
currently running at about 25 percent
capacity. As a result, the state’s mining sec-
tor has been largely lumped with Alaska’s
other industries such as tourism, fisheries
and air cargo.
The one mining opportunity the gover-
nor did single out in his speech to lawmak-
ers is a project few Alaskans are aware of,
the world-class Globe Creek limestone
deposit north of Fairbanks.
“We should be making and exporting
cement north of Fairbanks given all the
limestone available and the rail and high-
way infrastructure available,” he said.
Located near the Elliot Highway about
38 miles north of Fairbanks, Globe Creek is
the largest known high-purity limestone
deposit in the state.
Interior Alaska currently imports about
100 tons of lime per day, a demand that is
driven largely by its use as a neutralizer for
water quality at the Fort Knox and Pogo
mines.
In addition to supplying local needs,
Globe Creek could likely supply at least
50,000 tons of lime per year to other mines
in Alaska and export products overseas via
the Alaska Railroad extension to Port
MacKenzie, according to a 2007 rail link
analysis penned by Paul Metz, a �profes-
sor of geological engineering at University
of Alaska Fairbanks.
The market for Portland cement made
from Globe Creek limestone is considered
to be at least 10 times larger than that for
lime. At the time of Metz’s analysis,
Alaska, alone, used nearly 300,000 tons per
year of this building material.
An economically competitive lime and
cement plant, however, needs a reliable and
low-cost source of fuel for the kilns needed
to transform the limestone into a mar-
ketable product. Located adjacent to the
Dalton Highway, which connects the North
Slope to Fairbanks, and along the presumed
path of any future natural gas pipeline,
Globe Creek is positioned for any scenario
that delivers North Slope natural gas to
Alaska and world markets.
At a quarry rate of 3,320 tons per day,
the 1.6-billion-ton Globe Creek deposit
could provide limestone, Portland cement
and fertilizer to Alaska and the world for
more than 100 years, according to Metz’s
estimates.
Ambler mega-projectWhile getting gas to market and other
economy strengthening initiatives will help
the income side of the equation in the long
term, cuts in state spending are more imme-
diate steps being contemplated by Walker
and state lawmakers.
The governor’s first order of business
was a temporary suspension of all “mega-
projects being funded by the state.
“On Dec. 26, I took immediate action. I
issued an administrative order directing
that all ‘mega-projects’ stand down until
we can access their overall costs and bene-
fits to the state,” said Walker.
Among the big-budget projects being
re-evaluated, the Ambler Mining District
Industrial Access Road is one aimed specif-
ically at supporting mining in Alaska.
This 200-mile road would link the
Ambler Mining District to world markets.
Some $8 million of state funds had been
earmarked for the project in a budget pro-
posed by former Gov. Sean Parnell. The
project has no such support in Walker’s
budget.
The Ambler road project was transferred
from the Alaska Department of
Transportation and Public Facilities to the
Alaska Industrial Development and Export
Authority in 2013.
AIDEA – a private corporation created
by the Alaska Legislature in 1967 to pro-
mote, develop, and advance economic
growth and diversification in Alaska – is
not solely dependent on state funding to
advance the Ambler Road, or any of the
other projects in its portfolio.
In fact, the success of AIDEA’s invest-
ments in large infrastructure projects like
the Delong Mountain Transportation, a
road and port facility linking the Red Dog
zinc mine to world markets, are profitable
for the authority and state.
“These revenues not only cover our
operational expenditure; we also pay an
annual dividend of up to 50 percent of our
revolving fund net income to the State of
Alaska general fund,” said AIDEA exter-
nal affairs executive Karsten Rodvik.
This dividend equaled US$17.65 mil-
lion for 2014, bringing the total AIDEA has
paid to the state’s general fund to US$373.5
million.
To move forward with the Ambler
Road, AIDEA will need the funds to com-
plete an Environmental Impact Statement
for the project.
If federal agencies approve the road
project for permitting, then AIDEA will re-
evaluate whether building the road is a
good investment for the authority and state.
The Upper Kobuk Mineral Projects, a
partnership between NovaCopper Inc., a
mineral exploration company, and NANA
Regional Corp., the Native regional corpo-
ration that represents the Iñupiat of
Northwest Alaska, would likely provide the
financial base for repaying the cost of
building a road to Ambler.
In 2013, NovaCopper and AIDEA
entered into a memorandum of understand-
ing that allows AIDEA to investigate vari-
ous ways to fund the construction and
maintenance of the Ambler Road and cre-
ate the framework by which NovaCopper
will repay the investment by developing
mines at one or more of its high-grade cop-
per deposits in the area.
The two most advanced deposits, Arctic
and Bornite, currently has more than a 9.5
billion-pound copper-equivalent resource,
including zinc, lead, silver and gold by-
products at Arctic. l
continued from page 11
BUMPY ROAD“We should be making andexporting cement north of
Fairbanks given all the limestoneavailable and the rail and
highway infrastructure available.”—Gov. Bill Walker, Alaska
ALA
SKA
IN
DU
STR
IAL
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T A
ND
EX
PORT
AU
THO
RIT
Y
14NORTH OF 60 MINING PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF FEBRUARY 1, 2015
WHATEVER
WHENEVER
WHEREVER
judypatrickphotography.comCreative photography for the oil & gas industry.
907. 258.4704
sulphide deposits, are mined.
“We work hard to protect water quality
and to conserve usage through efficient
operations, engineering, and training” at
Greens Creek, Hecla said on its website.
Federal and state agencies completed a
review of the mine’s reclamation and clo-
sure plan in 2014, and for the first time,
added a requirement that Hecla provide
financial security to ensure “perpetual”
treatment of water discharged from the
mine after it closes.
Hecla reported in recent regulatory fil-
ings that it updated its asset retirement obli-
gation in early 2014 for Greens Creek to
reflect to reflect the revised reclamation
and closure plan. The company has esti-
mated undiscounted costs of roughly
$102.7 million for the plan, reflecting a
$28.8 million increase from the $73.9 mil-
lion cost estimate in the previous plan.
Hecla said the increase primarily result-
ed from the new requirement to include
perpetual water treatment in the closure
plan.
The new requirement resulted in an
increase to Hecla’s ARO asset and liability
of $8.0 million, after discounting the esti-
mated costs to present value.
In the third quarter of 2014, as part of
the revised reclamation and closure plan,
the company said it increased its bonding
for the mine to roughly $68.9 million.
Sarah Samuelson, a spokesman for the
U.S. Forest Service, said the requirement
for perpetual water treatment at Greens
Creek reflects an anticipated need to treat
water discharged from the mine indefinite-
ly.
“They won’t have a lot of water to treat,
but it must be treated forever,” she added.
Hecla has a solid record of compliance
with Alaska’s water quality standards at
Greens Creek, but the geochemical materi-
als that will remain in the deposit when the
mine closes will likely be very mobile
when they come in contact with water, said
Allan S. Nakanishi, supervisor for the
Mining Section of the Division of Water at
the Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation.
“If we cannot predict with confidence
when water treatment will no longer be
needed, we say, ‘perpetual’ or 100 years,
which is the foreseeable future,” said Kyle
Moselle, large mine project manager in the
Office of Project Management and
Permitting at the Alaska Department of
Natural Resources. With the new require-
ment in place, there is an expectation that
water draining from the mine site will con-
tinue to be treated, and Alaska has financial
assurance that this will occur going out 100
years, Moselle added.
Massive sulphide depositsGreens Creek is one of only two mines
in Alaska that produce metals from mas-
sive sulphide deposits; the Red Dog Mine
is the other.
Nakanishi said a similar review of the
reclamation and closure plan for Red Dog
is currently underway, but it is still early in
the process.
Ironically, naturally-occurring drainage
into one of the main creeks affected by
mining had no aquatic life before zinc and
lead production began at Red Dog. After
nearly 25 years of production at the
Northwest Alaska mine, Nakanishi said
Red Dog’s owners have actually improved
the water quality of the formerly “sterile”
creek to the point where it is habitable for
aquatic life; “fish and other wildlife are
slowly moving upstream.” l
continued from page 12
GREENS CREEK
results from the BRX and Klaza zones,
two of nine main mineralized struc-
tures identified at the Klaza property
to date. Rockhaven CEO Matt Turner
says the company plans “to substan-
tially expand the resource this coming
year while advancing development-
related engineering and metallurgical
studies.”
DOLLY VARDEN SILVER Jan. 23
reported the appointment of former
HECLA MINING CO. consultant
Rosie Moore as interim president and
CEO. Former Dolly Varden President
and CEO George Heard has resigned
and stepped down from the board.
Moore, who formerly represented
Hecla on the Dolly Varden board of
directors, has 30 years mining experi-
ence. She has worked as an analyst
for a globally invested mining-
focused hedge fund and as a mineral
exploration geologist. Moore formerly
served as CEO and director of
GEOINFORMATICS EXPLORATIONINC., managing its takeover of
RIMFIRE MINERALS CORP. to yield
KISKA METALS CORP. Hecla can
now nominate another representative
to the Dolly Varden board. John King
Burns has returned from a leave of
absence and will serve as co-chair-
man of the board with Allan Marter.
KAMINAK GOLD CORP. Jan. 27
reported results from 21 holes of infill
drilling from the Kona deposit and
the discovery of a new mineralized
zone at the company’s Coffee gold
project in the Yukon Territory. The
only granite-hosted of four gold
deposits considered in a 2014 prelimi-
nary economic assessment, Kona con-
tributes roughly 26,000 ounces of
recoverable oxide gold at an average
diluted grade of 1.22 grams per met-
ric ton gold. Though contributing rel-
atively few ounces in the current
PEA, Kaminak says Kona, together
with the recently discovered and
high-grade Kona North, represent key
resource upside targets at Coffee. The
company says the 1,685 meters
drilled at Kona in 2014 confirmed the
existing Kona geological interpreta-
tion, providing additional confidence
in the location, geometry and continu-
ity of the mineralized lodes.
Condemnation drilling at Coffee cut
13.72 meters of 3.24 g/t gold within
the buffer zone of the proposed val-
ley-fill heap leach facility about 900
meters south of the Kona deposit.
While follow-up at this new discov-
ery, known as Dolce, is required, it is
not expected to impact the proposed
location or design of the heap leach
facility. Other notable intercepts from
the 4,175-meter condemnation pro-
gram, included 6.8 g/t gold over 3.5
meters at the northern edge of the
proposed west waste dump, interpret-
ed as the western extension of the
Sumatra deposit, and 1.08 g/t gold
over 13.71 meters at the proposed
north dump, interpreted as the north-
ern extension of the Supremo T7
deposit. Kaminak says this drilling
has not materially impacted the loca-
tion of any infrastructure; however,
some design modifications may be
required.l
continued from page 12
NORTHERN NEIGHBORS
PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF FEBRUARY 1, 2015 15
DANJOHNSON(907) 365-8638
MELSMITHSON(907) 365-8640
CARLAUTHEMENT(907) 365-8613
2015 SILVERADO HD 2500CREW CAB LTZ - 6” SUSPENSION LIFTS
FEATURES• 35” TIRES
• 20” CUSTOM WHEELS• PAINTED TO MATCH WHEEL FLARES• PAINTED TO MATCH FRONT BUMPER
• 6” CHROME RUNNING BOARDS• 6” PRO COMP SUSPENSION LIFT
- WARRANTY FOR 5 YEARS/60,000 MILES
NON-LIFTED: • FRONT LEVELING W/ REAR BLOCKS
- ONLY ADDS 3”
• 33” TIRES• 20” CUSTOM WHEELS
GRIZZLY EDITIONCUSTOM LIFTED TRUCKS!
VISIT US ONLINEANCHORAGECHEVROLET.COM/FLEET
OR CALL (907) 365-8600
By KRISTEN NELSONPetroleum News
Field operations and gas projects
topped the list of priority issues iden-
tified by the oil and gas working group of
the transition team conference which
Alaska’s governor-elect, Bill Walker, and
Lt. Gov.-elect Byron Mallott assembled
in November after their election. The
transition report was released Jan. 21 and
is available online at
http://gov.alaska.gov/Walker/transition-
2014.html.
In releasing the report Walker said he
doesn’t expect to agree with every sug-
gestion, but said he would use the reports
to measure the interests of Alaskans in
issues at hand.
“This living document, sustained by
the relationships built during the confer-
ence, will be a valuable tool as we begin
to tackle the budget and review legisla-
tion for the coming year,” Walker said in
a statement.
Field operationsIn a summary of comments on the
field operations issue the report said two
themes emerged during the discussion of
field operations — that the administration
should have open discussions with indus-
try to determine how the state can work
more effectively with industry and that
state agencies need to be more responsive
to industry concerns. The report suggest-
ed that technical workshops might be a
way to accomplish that responsiveness.
The group discussed increasing pro-
duction, including incentivizing produc-
ers to explore and develop new opportu-
nities in new and legacy fields.
Providing access for “new competitive
entrants” was discussed, especially pro-
viding them with “reasonable and timely
access to existing field facilities.” The
report said there was contention in the
group as to how best to provide that
access and whether commercial negotia-
tions were sufficient with the majority of
the group of the opinion that commercial
negotiations were not sufficient “due to
disparities in the relative market power
among the stakeholders.”
The report said there was agreement
that regulation by the state of access to
facilities, if adopted, needed to be “time-
ly, on reasonable terms, and sensitive to
an existing owner’s investment in and
legacy use of such facilities.”
Existing regulatory issuesOn existing regulations there was con-
cern among many that requirements for
many routine approvals “were ill-defined
and inconsistently applied,” and that the
administration needed “to issue regula-
tions which more efficiently, consistently,
and timely resolve the approval process”
for routine activities.
DR&R, dismantling, removal and
restoration, were discussed and the group
agreed the state’s approach to DR&R
needed to be reviewed “to make sure that
the risk is equitably shared among stake-
holders.” A problem of potential regulato-
ry overlap was identified, and there were
comments that smaller oil companies “are
frustrated by the introduction of DR&R
bonding requirements into the lease
assignment process.” There was agree-
ment that greater clarity and consistency
is needed and “that the risks associated
with DR&R should be more broadly dis-
tributed.”
Another issue discussed was the
industry-supported 470 fund, used for oil
spills. The report noted that while only
the oil industry pays into the fund, it is
used “largely in support of commercial
shipping and other industry groups.”
The report said the group favored
expanding funding to include other indus-
try groups benefitting from the fund.
Gas projectConstruction of a large-diameter natu-
ral gas line for a liquefied natural gas
project is a “central goal for the new
administration,” the group said, urging
the Walker administration to maintain
momentum on the Alaska LNG project,
but also to “achieve a commitment to
build the AK LNG project through an
appropriately disciplined process.”
The administration should also con-
duct due diligence necessary to under-
stand and assess the project, “move for-
ward without inappropriate risk on either
side,” ensure Alaska’s needs are met and
encourage cooperation between the
Alaska LNG project and the in-state proj-
ect, the Alaska Stand Alone Pipeline.
Some members of the group were con-
cerned that there was not a current com-
mitment to build the Alaska LNG project;
others noted several steps need to be
taken by all participants, including the
state, before a commitment can be made.
There was concern about assessing the
LNG project in terms of how best to bring
the greatest net revenue to Alaska, as well
as contention over the extent to which the
new administration should be bound by
agreements reached by the prior adminis-
tration in Senate Bill 138 and the Heads
of Agreement.
Most in the group wanted a project
team formed to gather information, ana-
lyze the project and establish communi-
cation with the new administration and
the industry on revenue sharing between
the state and industry.
While there was agreement that the
administration should maintain momen-
tum for the construction of a large-diam-
eter gas line; some wanted to also see
momentum maintained for the in-state
line, the Alaska Stand Alone Pipeline.
The group was concerned that industry
may not progress the Alaska LNG proj-
ect, or that the state “may accept an inap-
propriate amount of risk or uncertainty,”
and a request that the Walker administra-
tion communicate and interact with
industry frequently and periodically
report the status and agreements to the
Legislature and the public. l
l G O V E R N M E N T
Operations, gas line transition focusReport from governor’s oil and gas team prioritizes field operations, gas, tax policy, government efficiency, offshore development
16 PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF FEBRUARY 1, 2015
Safer. Smarter.
Our CDR2-AC rig reflects the latest innovations in Arctic drilling to provide our customers with incident free performance and operational and technical excellence.
CDR2-AC is the first Arctic rig designed and built by Nabors specifically for Coil Tubing Drilling operations. The rig was built to optimize CTD managed pressure drilling to provide precise control
of wellbore pressures for improved safety, decreased costs, and increased wellbore lengths.
Combining safety and environmental excellence with greater efficiency means CDR2-AC can deliver the high value results customers have come to expect from Alaska’s premier drilling contractor.
Learn more about Nabors’ new drilling technologies at Nabors.com.
nabors.com
Better.
PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF FEBRUARY 1, 2015 17
Director, Division of Oil & Gas, Department of Natural Resources,
State of AlaskaThe State of Alaska is recruiting for the Director of the Division of Oil and Gas. This a very exciting and rewarding position that works closely with the Commissioner’s office to manage all Oil & Gas activities for the Department of Natural Resources. The successful candidate will direct the daily activities of a diverse group of professional staff that administers land, oil and gas leases, royalties and sub-surface management of the State’s oil & gas endowment.
Job Duties: • Negotiate, draft and administer agreements between the State, the oil industry, Native corporations, local governments, the federal government, and private individuals to advance and ensure responsible resource management and development • Execute laws, rules, regulations and orders adopted by the Commissioner. • Implement and support initiatives of the Governor and Commissioner. • Consult with the Attorney General’s Office to provide support and/or testimony in litigation or legal negotiations; • Lead and collaborate with a diverse team of geoscientists, engineers, leasing, accounting, permitting, commercial, economic and legal professionals • Implement process management improvement and quality management • Testify at legislative hearings
The successful candidate will demonstrate excellent skills and work experience with: • Alaska oil and gas issues. • Technical aspects of oil and gas exploration and development • Alaska Statutes, especially Title 38 and Title 31, and Alaska Regulations, especially Title 11 and Title 20. • Strong project management, teamwork, and leadership experience and abilities. • Outstanding communication skills. • Strong negotiation and problem solving skills.
Education:Required: College degree in petroleum engineering or geosciences. Secondarily preferred: Master’s degree in a related field including resource management or law.
Selection Process:The interview process may include up to three interviews. The successful applicant will be appointed by the Governor of the State of Alaska, and serves at the pleasure of the Governor and the Commissioner, Department of Natural Resources. Starting salary is dependent upon qualifications and experience.
To Apply:Please submit the following items via e-mail to [email protected] before 5:00 p.m. on February 8, 2015:
1. Resume (detailing applicable knowledge and experience); 2. List of three (3) professional references, at least one of which must be a current or past supervisor.
Notice to Applicants:The State of Alaska complies with Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Individuals with disabilities, who require accommodation, auxiliary aids or services, or alternative communication formats, please call 1-800-587-0430; or 465-4095 in Juneau; or (907) 465-3412 (TTY); or correspond with the Division of Personnel & Labor Relations at 10th Fl. State Office Building, PO Box 110201, Juneau, AK 99811. The State of Alaska is an equal opportunity employer.
15G-10-053
l F I N A N C E & E C O N O M Y
On the move in BC Montney
By GARY PARKFor Petroleum News
A rtek Exploration, a nimble-footed
Canadian exploration and production
junior, has posted some of the strongest ini-
tial results from its program in British
Columbia’s liquids-rich Montney play.
A horizontal well that the company
drilled and completed during the final
quarter of 2014 yielded a controlled 1,147
barrels of oil equivalent per day (70 per-
cent oil and condensate), rated as one of
the best 30-day liquids rates from the
Montney or any other formation in the
province.
It is also a step forward from Artek’s
initial well which averaged 903 boe per
day (77 percent liquids) in its first 30 days,
making the well among the leading two
during the first three quarters in British
Columbia.
Artek has a 59 percent working interest
in almost 100,000 acres of Montney rights
in the greater Inga/Firewood area, which is
being developed with four to eight wells
per section, making it the focus of the com-
pany’s program.
But its other play in the Doig formation
has also generated positive results, with
one of two horizontal wells flowing at
1,959 boe per day (73 percent oil and con-
densate) over its initial 30 days.
The latest Inga/Firewood well was
completed with a 36-stage slickwater
frack, while the Doig well was completed
with a 22-stage slickwater frack.
The second Doig well, completed with
a 29-stage slickwater frack, averaged a
controlled 1,280 boe per day (77 percent
oil and condensate).
To strengthen its prospects in
Inga/Firewood, Artek — in partnership
with Kelt Exploration — acquired 56,000
gross acres (with a 50 percent working
interest) in December, including 2,275
acres of Montney rights, for C$10.6 mil-
lion.
Artek’s stake includes 2.7 million cubic
feet equivalent per day (67 percent gas) of
production and proved plus probable
reserves of 13.2 billion cubic feet equiva-
lent (53 percent gas), plus four compres-
sion facilities, 170 miles of pipeline and an
oil battery/terminal.
The company expected 2014 volumes
to average 25.2 million cubic feet equiva-
lent per day (39 percent liquids) and plans
to release additional guidance for 2015
within a few weeks.
To help finance its operations, Artek
sold non-core assets in the Peace River
Arch area of northwestern Alberta, includ-
ing production of 2.4 million cubic feet
equivalent per day and proved plus proba-
ble reserves of 22.2 billion cubic feet
equivalent as well as 22,690 net acres in
Alberta.
Artek, which started as a private com-
pany 10 years ago, describes its primary
objective as deploying “strong technical
expertise” in its core areas, along with
“opportunistic acquisitions” that have
drilling upside and offer a competitive
advantage. l
ENVIRONMENT & SAFETYEPA proposes revised spill response regs
The Environmental Protection Agency has proposed regulations specifying new and
revised toxicity and efficacy tests for dispersants and other chemicals used in offshore
oil spill responses. The new regulations, which come in reaction to issues raised during
the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill in
the Gulf of Mexico, also include require-
ments for manufacturers to provide addi-
tional health and safety information for
the regulated materials.
The regulations also spell out revised
area planning requirements for the
authorization of the use of chemical and
biological agents, as well as new disper-
sant monitoring requirements when deal-
ing with some oil discharge situations.
“Our emergency officials need the best
available science and safety information to make informed spill response decisions
when evaluating the use of specific products on oil discharges,” said Mathy Stanislaus,
assistant administrator for EPA’s Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. “Our
proposed amendments incorporate scientific advances and lessons learned from the
application of spill-mitigating substances in response to oil discharges and will help
ensure that the emergency planners and responders are well-equipped to protect human
health and the environment.”
According to a preamble to the proposed regulations, the response to the Deepwater
Horizon spill involved the deployment of more than 1 million gallons of dispersant
onto surface oil slicks over a three-month period, and the injection of three quarters of
a million gallons of dispersants into the oil flowing from the out-of-control well. EPA
is now trying to address questions over the efficacy, toxicity, environmental tradeoffs
and monitoring challenges that this dispersant usage raised, EPA said in the preamble.
—ALAN BAILEY
The regulations also spell outrevised area planning
requirements for the authorizationof the use of chemical and
biological agents, as well as newdispersant monitoring
requirements when dealing withsome oil discharge situations.
• Catering and Cleaning Services•Equipment Rental
Kenai, Alaska | (907) [email protected]
www.fivestaroilfieldservices.com
WORK IS BETTER WHEN YOU’RE FED GOOD.
NATURAL GASChugach, AIX sign supply agreement
Chugach Electric Association could soon start buying natural gas from AIX
Energy LLC under the terms of a supply agreement the two parties closed toward
the end of last year.
The deal is the first since the Houston-based AIX Energy acquired the Kenai
Loop field from previous operator Buccaneer Energy Ltd., which filed for bank-
ruptcy in late May 2014.
“The contract provides flexibility in both the purchase price and volumes, with
specific prices and volumes to be determined by each transaction,” Chugach
Senior Vice President for Strategic Development and Regulatory Affairs Lee D.
Thibert told the Regulatory Commission of Alaska on Jan. 15. That said, the con-
tract caps prices at $6.24 per thousand cubic feet and caps volumes at 300 million
cubic feet, meaning that Chugach would spend no more than $1.9 million during
the nearly yearlong contract.
Interruptible contractThe interruptible contract allows Chugach or AIX Energy to choose to buy or
sell volumes as needed, although Chugach said it expected to need the available
volumes.
Although the companies signed the deal on Dec. 22, 2014, it only came to light
after Chugach asked regulators for permission to recover the gas purchases
through its rates.
While utilities typically seek regulatory approval for gas supply agreements,
Chugach is maintaining that regulatory approval isn’t required for deals lasting
less than a year.
Given the leap year in 2016, the deal between Chugach and AIX Energy holds
the distinction of running for 365 days and also for one day shy of a full calendar
year.
The state is taking comments on the request through Feb. 20.
Although AIX Energy acquired the Alaska assets of Buccaneer through a bank-
ruptcy auction last year, Buccaneer is still the official leaseholder, according to
state records.
—ERIC LIDJI
18 PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF FEBRUARY 1, 2015
24Hour
Machining Welding
OEM Equipment Production WeldingAccessories Certified Welding
Repair and Overhaul Fabrication
Serving Alaska’s Petroleum Industry for Over 35 Years
APIQR ISO9001:2008, reg. # 0717 • APIQR Spec Q1, reg. # Q1-0456
APIQR ISO/TS 29001, reg. # TS-0268
8875 King St., Anchorage | 907 563-3012 | [email protected] | www.umalaska.com
Threading
API 5CT, lic. # 5CT-1163 • API Spec 7-1, lic. # 7-1-0758 • Vallourec • VAM AB
Tenaris • Hunting • NS Connection Technology • NOV Grant Prideco • Vam USA
A SUMITOMO CORPORATION SUBSIDIARY
ENVIRONMENT & SAFETYDOE cites carbon sequestration success
The Department of Energy has announced the successful storage of 1 million
metric tons of carbon dioxide in a deep saline formation in Illinois. The project
comes as part of a major DOE sponsored carbon capture and storage research pro-
gram involving partnerships between DOE, state agencies, universities and pri-
vate companies. DOE says that the Illinois project contributes to President
Obama’s all-of-the-above energy strategy.
“This milestone is an important step towards the widespread deployment of
carbon capture technologies in real-world settings,” said Energy Secretary Ernest
Moniz. “The successful testing of these technologies and the lessons learned sup-
port a range of industries in the region, while also reducing the amount of emis-
sions in the atmosphere and protecting the planet at the same time.”
The Illinois project involves the capture of carbon dioxide from the Arthur
Daniels Midland Co.’s ethanol production facility in Decatur, Illinois, the com-
pression of the gas and the transportation of the gas through a mile-long pipeline
for injection into the Mount Simon sandstone formation 7,000 feet below the sur-
face. The injection test, which began in 2011, performed better than expected,
with pressures sustained well below regulatory limits, DOE says. A 300-foot thick
shale formation acts a seal inhibiting upward migration of the injected carbon
dioxide, which is expected to remain hundreds of feet below the shale for 100
years, the department says.
The Illinois State Geological Survey is leading a consortium called the
Midwest Geological Sequestration Consortium to evaluate options for carbon
sequestration and storage in the Illinois basin, a 60,000-square-mile geologic
basin that underlies most of Illinois, southwestern Indiana and western Kentucky,
DOE says.
—ALAN BAILEY
Oil sector should see job growth in 2015Even with declining oil prices, the Alaska Department of Labor and Workforce
Development expects inertia to keep oil industry employment growing this year.
The department expects the oil and gas
sector to add 200 jobs this year, which would
represent 1.4 percent growth over 2014,
according to an analysis from state econo-
mist Caroline Schultz in the January 2015
issue of Alaska Economic Trends. According
to preliminary figures, the oil and gas sector,
which includes service companies, added
some 500 jobs in 2014, which would represent 3.5 percent growth. Current oil
industry employment is about 14,800, up 200 over a year ago, according to the
state.
The growth in employment will come from development work at the
ExxonMobil-operated Point Thomson unit, the ConocoPhillips-operated Kuparuk
River unit and Colville River unit, appraisal activities from Repsol E&P USA and
Caelus Natural Resources Alaska.
Already this year, BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. laid off some 275 employees
as part of its sale of assets to Hilcorp Alaska LLC. Hilcorp is expected to rehire
many of the employees. And CH2MHill recently ended attempts to sell most of
its Alaska operation.
The small increase in oil sector jobs will be an anomaly this year, according to
the department, which is predicting flat job growth for the state overall, as small
gains in the private sector offset small losses in the public sector, particularly fed-
eral employment.
Oil industry employment in Alaska is closely correlated with oil prices. Over
the past quarter century, the two have moved nearly in lockstep, despite steadily
declining production and various fiscal systems, according to a 2008 study from
the department.
—ERIC LIDJI
FINANCE & ECONOMY
Current oil industryemployment is about 14,800,
up 200 over a year ago,according to the state.
l F I N A N C E & E C O N O M Y
Nikaitchuq primedfor royalty reductionFalling oil prices likely to trigger a reduction in royalty rate onthree leases at Eni US Operating’s offshore North Slope unit
By ERIC LIDJIFor Petroleum News
I f oil prices remain at their current levels
over the coming weeks, they will trigger
a reduction in the royalty rate at the
youngest producing oil field on the North
Slope.
Should the average monthly price of
Alaska North Slope crude oil fall below $48
per barrel, the royalty rate at the Nikaitchuq
unit would automatically drop to 5 percent
under the terms of a royalty modification
the state approved for the unit back in
January 2008.
If the change occurs, the state would take
less revenue from the unit than it currently
does, and unit operator Eni US Operating
Co. Inc. would keep more of the revenue it
currently generates, although the specifics
of the arrangement would temper the
impact.
The exact financial value of the change
is difficult to measure because it depends on
the price of oil and the amount of produc-
tion, both of which are always fluctuating.
But if oil prices remained just below the $48
per barrel threshold and oil production
remained constant, the state would lose
some $1.026 million per month from the
reduced royalty.
Eni requested royalty modification in
October 2007, as it was deciding whether to
sanction a major development effort at the
Nikaitchuq unit, off the coast of Oliktok
Point.
After determining that the project “does
not meet prudent-investor standards for eco-
nomic feasibility,” the Alaska Department
of Natural Resources approved the request
in January 2008. The approval came with
terms, many of which are important today.
First, the 5 percent royalty rate would
only goes into effect when oil prices fell
below $42.64 per barrel, a threshold adjust-
ed for inflation each May for the coming
year.
Through the end of April 2015, the
threshold is $48 per barrel, according to the
state.
Regardless of oil prices, the royalty
modification would also go into effect if
production falls below 4,000 barrels per day
during the first 10 years of sustained pro-
duction.
Second, the royalty rate would only go
into effect if Eni spent $822 million on
Nikaitchuq activities through the first six
years of development and $1.398 billion
through the first 11 years. The company has
met the first target, according to the state.
Third, the royalty reduction would only
cover production from the Schrader Bluff
OA reservoir. Recently, Eni has been
appraising the potential of the Schrader
Bluff N reservoir and has expressed an
interest in a Sag River reservoir at
Nikaitchuq. If the company ultimately sanc-
tions those pools, neither would qualify for
royalty reduction.
Fourth, the royalty reduction only
applies to production from leases commit-
ted to a participating area within six years of
the project being sanctioned. So even
though Eni is currently producing oil from
11 leases at the Nikaitchuq unit, only pro-
duction from the three leases in the
Schrader Bluff participating area qualify for
royalty reduction.
Fifth, the royalty modification program
ends after 25 years of sustained production.
When Eni sanctioned a $1.45 billion
development program at Nikaitchuq in
January 2008, Alaska oil prices were aver-
aging some $91 per barrel. When the unit
entered sustained production in April 2011,
Alaska oil prices were averaging some $120
per barrel.
On January 23, Alaska oil prices aver-
aged $46.74 per barrel.
The royalty modification program has
been used somewhat sparingly in Alaska,
with only three projects approved for modi-
fied royalty terms over the past two
decades.
Before Nikaitchuq, the state modified
the royalty rates on nine leases at the
Pioneer Natural Resources Alaska Inc.
operated Oooguruk unit. Earlier this year,
the state lowered the royalty rate on the five
Oooguruk leases associated with the Nuna
satellite of the offshore field, which is now
operated by Caelus Natural Resources
Alaska Inc. l
terms by Alberta Premier Jim Prentice,
who said low oil prices are removing the
support structure under his province.
He suggested the current conditions
are worse than the crude-price crash in
the 1980s when Alberta lost 50,000 jobs,
house prices dropped by 40 percent and
many, mostly U.S. controlled, oil and gas
companies abandoned Canada and did
not start returning in even small numbers
for many years.
CAPP sees C$23B cutIn the initial response to a gloomy out-
look, the Canadian Association of
Petroleum Producers forecast exploration
and production companies will slash C$23
billion from their capital spending in
Western Canada this year, lowering
expected production in 2016 by 120,000
barrels per day.
In updating its short-term forecast,
CAPP estimated capital spending will total
C$46 billion compared with C$69 billion
in 2014.
But it expects the oil sands sector will
suffer the least, dropping to C$25 billion
from last year’s C$33 billion.
CAPP President Tim McMillan said the
downward trends will not change the need
for the industry to build new pipelines
across North America to expand and diver-
sify export options.
“No question, the effects on the indus-
try are sharp, but we continue to need all
forms of transportation in all directions —
pipelines in particular,” he said.
CAPP forecast that the number of wells
to be drilled in Western Canada will
decline by 30 percent from last year to
7,350 wells — a cutback that will extend
to 2,300 support businesses across
Canada. Job losses are projected to reach
about 23,000.
The revised 2015 forecast for Western
Canadian oil production is now 3.6 million
bpd, about 150,000 bpd higher than 2014,
before the budget cuts take their bite.
Conventional production is expected to
be flat at 1.3 million bpd this year, while
the oil sands will rise to 2.3 million bpd as
projects come on stream from earlier
investments.
Governments expected to lose C$14.3BThe Conference Board of Canada said
the Canadian government alone will lose
C$4.3 billion this year from the collapse of
oil prices, while provincial revenues will
drop by almost C$10 billion.
However, the board is more optimistic
on the price outlook than other forecasters,
with its economists reckoning that the mar-
ket has likely hit bottom.
The report forecasts that West Texas
Intermediate will climb above US$60 a bar-
rel by the end of 2015, with an average
price for the year of US$56, compared with
US$93.20 in 2014.
The board said the Alberta economy
could slip into recession, a claim rejected by
Premier Jim Prentice, while Saskatchewan
and Newfoundland (Canada’s other signifi-
cant oil producing provinces) will feel the
pain from lower royalties.
Suncor Energy, the dominant oil sands
player, offered an even stronger ray of opti-
mism when it rated low prices as a tempo-
rary inconvenience.
Chief Financial Officer Alister Cowan
told investors his company will not delay its
biggest long-term growth projects because
it expects crude oil prices to double from
current levels to a US$90-US$100 range
within the next three or four years. l
PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF FEBRUARY 1, 2015 19
GOVERNMENTWalker names new AOGCC commissioner
Alaska Gov. Bill Walker has named a new commissioner to the Alaska Oil and
Gas Conservation Commission. Michael Gallagher replaces David Mayberry in
the public seat on the commission.
In an email the governor’s office said Gallagher has more than 38 years of
experience in the oil and gas, civil and vertical construction industries and cited
his “extensive knowledge in project management, maintenance and operations,
and human resource management.”
Gallagher most recently was project manager for the Alaska Laborers Training
School, overseeing construction of the $11 million facility.
Previously Gallagher spent more than 17 years as business manager for Local
341 of the Laborers International Union of North America. Gallagher also served
as vice president of the Alaska AFL-CIO for more than 10 years.
Mayberry, appointed by former Gov. Sean Parnell in July, had not been con-
firmed by the Legislature.
—PETROLEUM NEWS
continued from page 1
PRICE SHOCK
to drill this coming summer season.”
But Shell still needs quite a few of its
key permits for the Chukchi Sea opera-
tions, he said.
The company’s Chukchi drilling plans
have been on hold as a consequence of a
continuing appeal against the legality of
the 2008 lease sale in which the company
purchased its Chukchi Sea leases — the
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management
anticipates issuing a new record of deci-
sion for that lease sale in March, in
response to a court order resulting from
the appeal. The agency cannot approve
Shell’s Chukchi Sea exploration plan
until the new lease decision has been
issued.
In addition, the 9th Circuit Court of
Appeals has yet to rule on an appeal
against the validity of Shell’s oil spill
response plan for its Chukchi Sea opera-
tions.
Shell Chief Financial Officer Simon
Henry said that this year’s drilling opera-
tion would cost more than $1 billion, if it
goes ahead. And if the operation cannot
proceed, it will still cost nearly $1 billion,
because of Shell’s commitment to retain
the fleet of ships that it needs for the
drilling, Henry said, adding that the proj-
ect is as much an exercise in logistics as it
is a drilling operation. Van Beurden
likened the complex supply chain
required for drilling in the remote
Chukchi to running a North Sea drilling
operation out of New York.
Henry said that given the cost of
Shell’s Alaska venture and the company’s
total planned capital expenditure of $4
billion on worldwide exploration in 2015,
spending outside Alaska would be limited
to $3 billion, a reduction from 2014
spending levels.
In the Chukchi Sea, Shell plans to drill
in its Burger prospect, about 80 miles off-
shore the western end of the North Slope,
using two drilling vessels: the Noble
Discoverer and the Polar Pioneer. Burger
contains a known major natural gas pool,
but Shell thinks that the structure is also
likely to hold oil.
—ALAN BAILEY
goal of bringing affordable natural gas to
Interior Alaska” and said its acquisition of
Pentex would promote an integrated gas
distribution system that can be built and
operated in a more efficient manner for
the benefit of Fairbanks and North Pole
residents and businesses.
Fairbanks Natural Gas delivers
trucked liquefied natural gas from Cook
Inlet to Fairbanks, serving some 1,120
customers.
A second gas distribution utility, the
Interior Gas Utility, certified by the
Regulatory Commission of Alaska in late
2013, will serve customers in both
Fairbanks and North Pole, beginning with
deliveries in North Pole in 2016 and
expanding its distribution system to serve
as many as 12,000 customers by 2027.
Hilcorp Alaska LLC subsidiary
Harvest Alaska LLC is in the process of
purchasing the Titan Alaska LNG facility
at Port Mackenzie, with plans to expand
the facility, a purchase announced in
November. Titan and FNG are both sub-
sidiaries of Pentex.
In a Jan. 29 statement Harvest said the
AIDEA announcement was “unexpect-
ed,” but that Hilcorp and Harvest “share
the desire to get cleaner, more affordable
energy to the Interior as soon as possi-
ble,” and said the companies look forward
to collaborating with AIDEA and the state
on the effort.
“We don’t fully understand yet how
this will affect our existing agreement to
purchase the Point Mackenzie LNG facil-
ity, but we think Harvest is the best can-
didate to own, operate and quickly
advance efforts to expand LNG deliveries
to the Alaskan Interior. In fact, we are
working on plans that could provide
incremental LNG capacity within 18
months,” Harvest President Sean Kolassa
said in a statement.
Gov. Bill Walker said, “It is important
that we keep our eye on the immediate
goal of bringing energy relief to Interior
Alaska. AIDEA’s initiative to help
streamline gas distribution systems in the
Interior is a positive development.”
AIDEA Board Chairman Dana Pruhs
said “Pentex, under AIDEA ownership,
will work closely with the community
and utilities to reduce construction and
operation costs for both natural gas distri-
bution systems. This efficient approach
will lead to lower cost energy for con-
sumers.”
—KRISTEN NELSON
continued from page 1
CHUKCHI DRILLING
continued from page 1
AIDEA BUY
In updating its short-term forecast,CAPP estimated capital spendingwill total C$46 billion compared
with C$69 billion in 2014.
20 PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF FEBRUARY 1, 2015
ADVERTISER PAGE AD APPEARS ADVERTISER PAGE AD APPEARS ADVERTISER PAGE AD APPEARS
Companies involved in Alaska and northern Canada’s oil and gas industry
All of the companies listed above advertise on a regular basis with Petroleum News
AAcuren USAAECOM Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21Air LiquideAircaft Rubber Mfg. (ARM-USA)Alaska Analytical LaboratoryAlaska Clean Seas (ACS)Alaska CommunicationsAlaska DreamsAlaska Marine Lines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .24Alaska RailroadAlaska Rubber Alaska Steel Co.Alaska TextilesAlaska West Express . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .24Alpha Seismic CompressorsAmerican Marine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5Arctic ControlsArctic Slope Telephone Assoc. Co-op.Arctic Wire Rope & SupplyARCTOSArmstrong . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3ASRC Energy ServicesAT&TAvalon Development
B-FBPBaker HughesBald Mountain Air ServiceBattelle AnchorageBombay DeluxeBrooks Range SupplyCalista Corp.Canrig Drilling Technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21Carlile Transportation ServicesCCI Industrial Services LLCCGGChevrolet of South Anchorage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15ClearSpan Fabric StructuresCN RailColville Inc.Computing Alternatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2CONAM ConstructionConocoPhillips AlaskaConstruction Machinery IndustrialCook Inlet EnergyCrowley SolutionsCruz ConstructionDelta LeasingDenali IndustrialDET-TRONICS
Dowland-Bach Corp.Doyon AnvilDoyon DrillingDoyon, LimitedDoyon Universal ServicesEgli Air Haulexp Energy ServicesExpro Americas LLCF. Robert Bell and AssociatesFairweatherFive Star Oilfield Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .17Flowline AlaskaFluor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9Foss MaritimeFugro
G-MGBR Oilfield Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7GCI Industrial Telecom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10GCR Tires & ServiceGlobal Diving & SalvageGlobal Geophysical ServicesGMW Fire ProtectionGolder AssociatesGreer Tank & WeldingGuess & Rudd, PCHawk Consultants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .22HDR AlaskaIFR WorkwearInspirationsJudy Patrick PhotographyKakivik Asset Management LLCKenworth AlaskaKuukpik Arctic ServicesLast Frontier Air VenturesLearn to ReturnLister IndustriesLittle Red Services, Inc. (LRS)Lounsbury & AssociatesLynden Air Cargo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .24Lynden Air Freight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .24Lynden Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .24Lynden International . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .24Lynden Logistics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .24Lynden Transport . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .24MagTec AlaskaMapmakers of AlaskaMAPPA TestlabMaritime HelicoptersM-I SwacoMiller EnergyMotion Industries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .19
N-PNabors Alaska Drilling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16NalcoNANA WorleyParsonsNASCO Industries Inc.Nature Conservancy, TheNEI Fluid TechnologyNMS LodgingNordic CalistaNorth Slope Telecom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21Northern Air CargoNorthern Electric Inc.Northrim BankOpti Staffing Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18Pacific Alaska Lumber PacWest Drilling SupplyPENCO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5Pebble PartnershipPetroleum Equipment & Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7PND Engineers Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8PRA (Petrotechnical Resources of Alaska)Price Gregory InternationalRemote Access Technology (RAT)Resource Development CouncilRavn Alaska (formerly Era Alaska)
Q-ZSAExplorationSecurity AviationSophie Station SuitesSTEELFAB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7Stoel RivesTaiga VenturesTanks-A-LotThe Local PagesThink OfficeTotal Safety U.S. Inc.TOTE-Totem Ocean Trailer ExpressTotem Equipment & SupplyTTT EnvironmentalUdelhoven Oilfield Systems ServicesUMIAQ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2Unique MachineUnivar USA URS AlaskaUsibelliVerizonVigor AlaskaVolant ProductsWeston Solutions, Inc.
Oil Patch BitsGCI Industrial Telecom celebrates 5 years in Texas
GCI Industrial Telecom, a division of GCI, said it is celebrating the fifth anniversary ofits field office in Houston, Texas. GCI Industrial Telecom continues to support the commu-nication needs of the energy sector throughout Alaska and the Gulf of Mexico/Texasregions with proven technical and engineering expertise and competitive professionalservices.
“Our clients asked us about 6 years back for a bigger presence in the Houston andGulf of Mexico markets and we responded. Our team continues to grow, and today wemanage over 25 satellite systems and have over 20 full time teammates based out ofTexas and Louisiana. We are building relationships built on trust and performance.” saidGCI Industrial Telecom Senior Director Rick Hansen. GOM Regional Manager Jon Legatoadded “Our clients share our focus on safe, competitive, and professional telecommunica-tion services. Our operations and maintenance team becomes an integrated part of ourclient’s operations, especially on their offshore facilities. We are bringing value to ourclients’ projects.”
With fully staffed offices in Deadhorse and Anchorage, Alaska, and Houston, Texas, GCIIndustrial Telecom employs more than 150 professional telecommunication engineers,project managers and technicians to support the full life cycles of industrial and remoteoperations. For more information visit www.gci.com/industrialtelecom or call toll-free at877-411-1484.
Northern Air Cargo announces new hires and promotionsAnchorage based Northern Aviation
Services said it recently appointed DaveSquier to chief operating officer of the com-pany. Squier previously held the position ofvice president of cargo services ofAnchorage based subsidiary Northern AirCargo. In his new capacity Squier will haveoversight of cargo and ground operations atboth NAC and Honolulu, Hawaii-based sub-sidiary Aloha Air Cargo.
Northern Air Cargo also recently hiredSami Glascott for the position of chief oper-ating officer. Glascott previously served as director of sales for NAC and formerly as presi-dent and CEO of the Anchorage Chamber of Commerce and regulatory affairs manager atthe Alaska Oil and Gas Association. Glascott holds a master’s degree in public administra-tion from the University of Alaska Anchorage, a Foraker Certificate in non-profit manage-ment and a bachelor’s degree in geology from Colorado College.
Brian Heath has assumed the position of general manager of Northern Air
SAMI GLASCOTTDAVE SQUIER
see OIL PATCH BITS page 22
Johnson: I think that we have to contin-
ue to advance a natural gas pipeline.
We’ve worked very hard on that. We’ve
done some very good work on that. That’s
one of my top priorities. I think it’s impor-
tant to the committee and the Legislature
as a whole. I’m a little concerned that
there is a perception that it’s being slowed
down We have to keep an eye on the
future. Budgeting is tough — budgeting is
going to be very difficult. It’s going to be
the weight round everyone’s neck. We
can’t abandon our children. We can’t aban-
don future generations. We’ve put away
money for occasions such as this. As the
governor says, I don’t think we are in a
crisis either but I think we ought to be
very concerned that we spend money
wisely, and we do govern the right way.
Once again we can’t abandon projects that
are going to be a revenue source and a
source of reasonable energy for the
Interior and hopefully all of Alaska, and
diversify our economy. The industries are
available once you get a dependable ener-
gy source. I see it as a way to diversify
and we can’t abandon them. If you go
back to the ’80s, Susitna Dam was aban-
doned because of the price of oil. The
Knik Arm Bridge was abandoned because
of the price of oil. If we had a Susitna
Dam and were paying less for electricity,
who knows what industries could have
sprung up. It’s important to me that we not
lose vision of the future while being very
cognizant of what’s going on today in
terms of money.
Petroleum News: Have you heardenough from the governor yet on his visionfor the gas line?
Johnson: No I haven’t. I’m concerned
about his continued lawsuit for Point
Thomson. If you talk to anyone who has
been around in this building for a while
they will tell you that without Point
Thomson, there will be no gas line. That is
a given. There is not enough gas up there
to continue to bring the oil up and fuel that
pipeline. So without it, it’s gone. I’m con-
cerned that the governor is still involved in
that lawsuit.
Petroleum News: Now, he did say lastweek that it will be resolved. He did sayyes when asked whether that meant out ofcourt.
Johnson: Well, is that a settlement? Is
that him dropping it? Is it going to be
something that adds expense to it? So I
don’t know the answer, so I’m still con-
cerned. Is it settled on his part because
he’s turned it over to someone else? I want
to know the definitions of settled. Is it for
him or is it really going away? So those
are things I want to see. He uses terms like
tidewater. Now he explained that. He also
said he’s been working on a pipeline for
37 years. Those kind of things.
And when you remove that kind of
experience from the AGDC board — that
concerns me. The two projects run paral-
lel. They are designed to come together.
Basically north of Fairbanks is the big
line; south of Fairbanks is ASAP. If the big
line fails then the information from
Prudhoe to Fairbanks goes to the small
line.
If it goes then the information from
south of Fairbanks to Nikiski goes to the
big line, so we are not wasting money.
Everyone says you can’t have two
pipelines. Well, everyone knows you can’t
have two pipelines. It was designed to
work together and merge.
Those confidentiality agreements are
very important to that process. It concerns
me that he won’t let anyone but Marty
Rutherford sign those agreements. It she
going to be the only one making those
decisions? It is going to be made in a vac-
uum? So those kind of things: not under-
standing how it was designed; what was
done; the years of work quite frankly by
the members of this body, members of the
committee; the speaker (Mike Chenault)
and Mike Hawker particularly designing it,
putting it together and building it in such a
way that it was a merger of the two.
I think that is something that the gover-
nor has lost or doesn’t understand that
concept that concerns me. Now can he
learn it? Absolutely. When he and his peo-
ple start reading the bills and seeing what
was done, will a light go off? Hopefully.
He’s a smart man. So those are concerns
that I have. Are they insurmountable? No.
Am I pessimistic? No. But I’m cautious. I
think we need to be ready to respond in
the event that it goes in a different direc-
tion.
Petroleum News: The governor hasbrought two people onboard that in thepast have differed philosophically with theLegislature: Mark Myers and MartyRutherford. How is that working for youright now?
Johnson: I’m not sure Mark and Marty
don’t bring different philosophies between
themselves. Once we have a chance to talk
to Mark and vet him, we’ll know. I’ve
worked with Marty during ACES and
AGIA, so I kind of know where she is
coming from.
Also, she’s been in the private sector
for a number of years. That has a way of
changing someone’s attitude. I don’t want
to say she has been a career bureaucrat but
someone who has been in that game long
enough to know what’s going on then
stepping over to the other side. That’s a
very enlightening opportunity for people.
We don’t have enough private sector peo-
ple in government. Hopefully she can
merge what she knew and what she’s
learned into something that will advance
the state in a project that can help the state
monetize our gas. In my conversations,
I’m not as concerned about Marty. I think
she has a pretty good handle on what we
did in forming the standalone pipeline
project, the bills and legislation that
enabled the creation. I think she sees that
maybe there is some merit to it. But that
remains to be seen. I don’t want to put
words into her mouth. I am cautiously
optimistic that she gets it.
Petroleum News: It sounds like you’rewilling to listen and offer a benefit of thedoubt still.
Johnson: That’s absolutely it. I would-
n’t be doing my job if I wasn’t. I’m not the
smartest in this building. I’ll tell you that
right now. There are people who know a
lot more than me. So I depend on those
people. I’m pretty hard to fool. I’m really
hard to fool twice. I’m going to give them
the benefit of the doubt, but I’m not going
to wait very long if I see things going off
track before I start screaming and hollering
and using what little power I have to bring
it back. The ultimate goal is to monetize
that resource. Every delay and every bit of
lack of confidence in a partner, that indeci-
sion causes great consternation in board
rooms. I can just see the boards of Exxon,
BP and Conoco are sitting around and say-
ing what’s he going to do? I’m sure they
are saying that a lot. I hate to use the term
alignment because it’s over used, but
unless we have a certain alignment, this
isn’t going to work.
Petroleum News: On to the topic thatnever seems to go away: oil taxes. I knowoil taxes didn’t cause the budget shortfallthe state faces, but the issue of getting it
right prevails. What’s your take on that?Johnson: The budget shortfall is
because of oil prices. And we have a
spending problem. And we have a revenue
problem. The way you solve that problem
is the price of oil going up and getting
more oil in the pipeline. I think SB 21 gets
more oil in the pipeline. Will it go away?
No. But there will be disingenuous people
out there who had a different agenda. They
lost the vote saying we need to change it. I
think that the production tax is one ele-
ment of SB 21. Now, are there elements of
that package that may not have been per-
fect, but have we given it a chance? No. If
we don’t have a healthy oil industry we
will not have a natural gas pipeline. If the
oil companies decide they don’t want to
continue to develop and continue to invest,
you’re not going to have a bunch of com-
panies coming in here saying let’s invest in
gas. It’s not going to happen. So we have
to have that healthy oil business to keep
TAPS going and I think SB 21 is our best
shot so far. Time will tell, but I’m very
reluctant to start tweaking some of those
levers. l
PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF FEBRUARY 1, 2015 21
continued from page 5
JOHNSON Q&A
Alaska’s Premier Motorola DealerProviding Alaskans with two way radio and wireless communications.
The future of two-way radio.
NORTH SLOPETELECOM, INC.
907.751.8200 | www.nstiak.com
MOTOTRBOTM PROFESSIONALDIGITAL TWO-WAYRADIO SYSTEM.
nation’s domestic energy resources is a
key part of the president’s efforts to sup-
port American jobs and reduce our
dependence on foreign oil,” said Interior
Secretary Sally Jewell when announcing
the draft plan. “This is a balanced propos-
al that would make available nearly 80
percent of the undiscovered technically
recoverable resources, while protecting
areas that are simply too special to devel-
op.”
The proposed plan adds the Hanna
Shoal area of the Chukchi Sea to the list
of areas excluded from oil and gas leasing
because of environmental concerns.
Interior says that scientific research has
found this area to be of critical impor-
tance to many marine species, including
Pacific walruses and bearded seals. Four
other areas withdrawn from leasing in the
Chukchi and Beaufort seas had already
been excluded from leasing in the current
2012-2017 lease sale plan.
The Hanna Shoal lies under a broad
area of relatively shallow water in the
northeastern Chukchi Sea.
Presidential withdrawalsIn an order coinciding with the publi-
cation of the draft lease sale plan
President Obama announced that he is
withdrawing indefinitely from future
lease sales the exclusion areas that are
specified for the Chukchi and Beaufort
seas, including the Hanna Shoal. The
rights of the holders of existing leases in
the withdrawn areas will not be altered by
the president’s order. Under the terms of
the lease sale plan, the exclusion areas
had been deferred from leasing, leaving
open the possibility of incorporating the
areas into a future lease sale program. The
president’s withdrawal order makes the
exclusions more permanent in nature.
A statement from the White House
says that, in placing 9.8 million acres of
the Beaufort and Chukchi seas indefinite-
ly off limits to leasing, President Obama
is taking another step to protect the
nation’s most valuable natural resources.
“Teeming with biological diversity,
these areas in the Beaufort and Chukchi
are part of one of the last great marine
wildernesses left untouched by develop-
ment,” the statement says.
The statement also comments that the
president’s all-of-the-above energy strate-
gy has supported economic growth and
helped reduce U.S. dependence on for-
eign oil.
“But even as we consider new places
that may be appropriate to responsibly
develop oil and gas, we can take mean-
ingful steps to protect areas that matter
most for our environment, our Native
communities and our cultural identity,”
the statement says.
Plan componentsWhile Interior has placed some new
restrictions on future leasing in the Arctic
offshore, the agency has at the same time
broadened the outer continental shelf
leasing program by including in its pro-
posed five-year lease sale plan a lease
sale in the Atlantic, off the U.S. East
Coast. However, areas offshore the
Pacific coast remain closed to oil and gas
leasing, and a section of the eastern Gulf
of Mexico remains off limits.
Under the proposed plan, a lease sale
for the Beaufort Sea outer continental
shelf would be held in 2020; a sale for the
federal waters of lower Cook Inlet would
take place in 2021; and a Chukchi Sea
lease sale would be scheduled for 2022.
In addition to the new lease-sale exclu-
sion area over the Hanna Shoal, the
Chukchi Sea lease sale would continue to
exclude a 25-mile-wide buffer zone along
the coast, as well as some subsistence
hunting areas in the Chukchi and
Beaufort seas. The proposed plan says
that some other potential areas of deferral,
such as the Barrow Canyon and Camden
Bay, may be considered for the lease sale
program.
Cook InletIn Cook Inlet, Interior proposes limit-
ing its lease sale to the northern portion of
the federal Cook Inlet planning area, to
balance the need to protect endangered
species with the need to make available
areas with the highest hydrocarbon
resource potential. As part of the lease
sale program it may also prove necessary
to instigate some land area deferrals to
protect the critical habitats of the beluga
whales and sea otters, the proposed lease
sale plan says.
The North Aleutian basin in the Bristol
Bay area remains excluded from oil and
gas lease sales following President
Obama’s December 2014 withdrawal of
the area from future leasing.
“Options for the Alaska region take
into account the expressed support of the
State of Alaska for OCS oil and gas activ-
ity in the Arctic areas and Cook Inlet, as
well as the conditional support of the
local Alaska Natives for a targeted leasing
strategy, existing leases and/or activity in
federal and/or state waters; significant
estimated resources, and substantial
industry interest,” the proposed plan says.
For the Gulf of Mexico, Interior plans
to conduct a series of region-wide lease
sales that would each encompass the
entirety of available acreage in western,
central and eastern Gulf — in the past
there have been separate sales for the
each part of the Gulf. The plan envisages
two Gulf of Mexico sales per year,
22 PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF FEBRUARY 1, 2015
Providing project management professionals for major projects throughout Alaska and the world for over 30 years.
continued from page 1
OCS SALES
see OCS SALES page 24
Maintenance Services, a subsidiary ofNorthern Air Cargo and will oversee themanagement of NAMS ground services.
Bob Reith, a 23.5-year employee ofNAC, most recently serving as director ofground operations of its subsidiary NAMS,has transitioned to the new position ofdirector of Deadhorse operations forNAMS.
Lorrie Rogers joined the NAC staff asmanager of technical publications. Lorriecomes to NAC from PenAir where sheworked for nine years in their technicalpublications department and brings com-prehensive experience in technical writing,editing, proofreading and publishing com-pany manuals. For more information visitwww.northernaircargo.com.
CGG GeoSoftware winsHouston Business MarketingAssociation Award
The North America and Latin Americamarketing team for CGG GeoSoftware hasearned first place in the qualitative andquantitative market research category ofthe 2014 annual marketing research awardbestowed by the Business MarketingAssociation of Houston. This is the firsttime CGG has entered the association’sannual Lantern Awards competition.
The marketing team created a survey togain a greater understanding of its targetaudience under the geological and geo-physical umbrella — geologists, geophysi-cists, petrophysicists, reservoir engineersand completions engineers. An initial tele-phone invitation encouraged prospectiveclients to participate in a comprehensiveand highly confidential research study onG&G software and services. Respondentsreceived a complimentary summary of theresults in an analyzed report.
Mike Eyre, North America region man-ager, GeoSoftware, CGG, said: “We recog-nized that existing industry studies failedto focus on the usage and satisfaction ofG&G software users within the oil and gasexploration and production industry inNorth America. We utilized the researchapproach to gain the trust and attention ofour key prospects while using the surveyas a tool to effectively qualify accounts asgood sales leads for our technology.”
BMA Houston celebrated 26 years ofmarketing excellence during its 2014 pre-miere awards event in Texas. BMA Houstoncreated the Lantern Awards of Texas forone sole purpose — to highlight top-quali-ty creative and strategic business-to-busi-ness communications.
Editor’s note: All of these news items— some in expanded form — will appearin the next Arctic Oil & Gas Directory, afull color magazine that serves as a mar-keting tool for Petroleum News’ contract-ed advertisers. The next edition will bereleased in March.
continued from page 20
OIL PATCH BITS
U.S
. D
EPA
RTM
ENT
OF
THE
INTE
RIO
R,
BUR
EAU
OF
OC
EAN
EN
ERG
Y M
AN
AG
EMEN
T
the central North Slope area that hosts the
producing oil fields of Arctic Alaska, is
thought to be highly prospective for oil
and gas but for many years has been sub-
ject to a prohibition on oil exploration and
development.
“Designating vast areas in the Arctic
National Wildlife Refuge as wilderness
reflects the significance this landscape
holds for America and its wildlife,” said
Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell on
Jan. 25 when announcing the publication
of the final ANWR EIS. “Just like
Yosemite or the Grand Canyon, the Arctic
National Wildlife Refuge is one of our
nation’s crown jewels and we have an
obligation to preserve this spectacular
place for generations to come.”
In response to the EIS publication,
President Obama said that he felt proud
that Interior had put forward a compre-
hensive plan that would protect the refuge
and designate new areas, including the
coastal plain, for preservation.
“And I’m going to be calling on
Congress to make sure that they take it
one step forward by designating as a
wilderness, so that we can make sure this
amazing wonder is preserved for future
generations,” the president said.
Walker angryDuring a hastily convened press con-
ference on Jan. 25 Alaska Gov. Bill
Walker expressed his anger at the
Department of the Interior’s decision.
Walker said that during a phone call with
Secretary Jewell he had expressed strong
disappointment over the lack of discus-
sion over the Fish and Wildlife decision
before the decision was made.
“I’m very angry that this is happen-
ing,” Walker said. “They are taking our
economy away from us piece by piece.”
Walker said that he had explained to
Jewell that Alaska is dependent on
resource development and has an oil
pipeline that is now three-quarters empty.
And in response to Jewell’s comparison
between ANWR and Yosemite or the
Grand Canyon, Walker commented on the
amount of commercial tourism-related
activity in the two Lower 48 parks.
“I think it’s quite a bit more than goes
on in ANWR,” Walker said. “I’d love to
be treated like the Grand Canyon or
Yosemite as far as the kind of commerce
that goes on there responsibly.”
This ANWR decision is like banning
tourism in Hawaii to keep Hawaii pris-
tine, he said.
Plan of actionWalker said that litigation against the
Fish and Wildlife decision would not be
his first choice in responding to the deci-
sion. Rather than initiating a four- to six-
year litigation process, the governor said
that he and his team would put together a
plan of action and that he would first
reach out to other states and the public.
Kara Moriarty, president and CEO of
the Alaska Oil and Gas Association, an oil
industry trade association, expressed her
anger at the Fish and Wildlife decision.
“This is offensive,” Moriarty said. “It’s
offensive to Alaskans when we have the
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, already
92 percent of it is off limits to develop-
ment. … I think this decision sends the
signal that the federal government is not
allowing Alaska to be open for business.”
Congressional delegationOn Jan. 26 Alaska’s Congressional
delegation expressed its displeasure at the
Obama administration’s actions, referenc-
ing not only the ANWR decision but also
a permitting decision in the National
Petroleum Reserve-Alaska and a forth-
coming outer continental shelf lease sale
plan proposal, involving the withdrawal
of some offshore lands from future oil and
gas leasing.
“It is a one, two, three kick to the gut
of Alaska’s economy,” said Sen. Lisa
Murkowski. “We have said as a delega-
tion that we will not stand it, we will not
tolerate it, we will do everything we can
to push back against an administration
that has taken a look at Alaska and decid-
ed it’s a ‘nice little snow globe up there
and we’re going to keep it that way.’
That’s not how you treat a state. Show us
some respect.”
Rep. Don Young claimed that the Fish
and Wildlife action violates ANILCA, the
Alaska National Interest Lands
Conservation Act, the act that established
ANWR. ANILCA has a clause requiring
an act of Congress before ANILCA’s
scope can be extended.
“This brazen assault on Alaska only
strengthens our resolve to push back,”
Young said. “This latest decision, in clear
violation of ANILCA’s ‘no more’ clauses,
completely undermines the law and the
many promises made to the Alaskan peo-
ple. This is unacceptable and I am already
beginning work in the House to ensure
this assault is stopped dead in its tracks.”
“This attack on Alaska families and the
middle class is deeply troubling,” said
Sen. Dan Sullivan. “I pledge to do every-
thing in my power to protect the econom-
ic growth and prosperity of our state, and
defend the promises made to Alaskans
under ANILCA.”
ASRC commentsThe Arctic Slope Regional Corp., the
Native regional corporation for the North
Slope, expressed its opposition to the Fish
and Wildlife decision.
“The people of the Arctic Slope
region, specifically Kaktovik, have
thrived in this area for over 10,000 years,
and therefore fall outside of the definition
of characteristics of wilderness,” ASRC
said in a Jan. 26 statement. “The people
of the Arctic Slope region, especially the
residents of Kaktovik, are conservation
minded, and yet rely on responsible oil
and gas development to sustain our com-
munities. This proposed designation as
announced would effectively slam the
door shut on the substantial economic
PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF FEBRUARY 1, 2015 23
Curt Nading, President (907) 561-2220 [email protected] www.crealaska.com
WAREHOUSE - FOR LEASE
In addition to Sales & Leasing, Commercial Real Estate Alaska provides professional on call 24/7 Commercial Property Management for over 25+ years. Call today for a confidential consultation
81 E Commercial Drive, Palmer, AK
59,240sf Warehouse *Manufacturing *Warehousing
* Laydown Yard 9-OH & 1-Dockhigh Doors, 3- -
Sprinklers, Gated, 11.67 Acres, Approx. 1,600sf Nice Office
Space, Purchase Price $6,975,000 or $1.00NNN Lease
10,500sf Warehouse/Office with Yard
2-OH Doors & 1-Delivery Door, 3- -
Suppressant System, 2011 Built, 1.51 Acres $1.35psf NNN Lease
2799 Rampart Drive, Anchorage
continued from page 1
ANWR PLAN
ANWR and the 1002 area of the coastal plainThe story of the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge dates back to 1960 when the
Arctic National Wildlife Range was established in the extreme northeast of Alaska.
In 1980, under the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act, an act that
established a series of national parks in Alaska, the Wildlife Range was renamed the
Alaska National Wildlife Refuge. Most of ANWR lies within a mountainous region
of the eastern Brooks Range. However, recognizing the oil and gas potential of the
northern strip of the refuge, on the eastern extension of the North Slope coastal plain,
section 1002 of ANILCA, while putting much of ANWR off limits to development,
deferred a decision on future development on the coastal plain section of the refuge.
That coastal strip became known as the 1002 area.
Under the terms of ANILCA the 1002 area can only be opened for oil and gas
exploration if the U.S. Congress passes an act authorizing the opening. To date
Congress has not passed the required act, despite strenuous efforts at various times
to gain house, senate and presidential support for the enabling legislation.
However, in 1985 and 1986 Chevron and BP were able to drill a single explo-
ration well, the KIC well, in the 1002 area in Native land southeast of the village of
Kaktovik. The results from that well have remained commercially confidential.
Much promiseWith the geology of the 1002 area being an eastward continuation of that of the
central North Slope, where massive oil fields such as Prudhoe Bay and Kuparuk
River are located, the 1002 area is thought to hold much promise as a target for new
oil and gas exploration. A 2005 assessment by the U.S. Geological Survey estimated
that there may be 10.2 billion barrels of undiscovered technically recoverable oil and
37.5 trillion cubic feet of undiscovered natural gas under the 1002 area.
Other than resources in Native land near Kaktovik, any oil or gas in the 1002 area
belongs to the federal government. However, were oil production to start from the
area, the state would be entitled to tax the production and would be paid a share of
the federal royalties on the oil. And oil passing from ANWR into the trans-Alaska oil
pipeline for transportation to market would improve the overall economics of the
Alaska oil industry, hence indirectly further increasing state revenues.
—ALAN BAILEY
3 MILE LIMIT: STATE/FEDERAL
BOUNDARY
KIC WELL 1PT THOMSON UNIT 1KaktovikPrudhoe Bay
Deadhorse
ARCTIC NATIONALWILDLIFE REFUGE
ANWR 1002 AREA
WILDERNESS AREA
Dalton H
ighway
Tran
s Ala
ska
Pipe
line
PUMP STATION 1
PUMP STATION 2
Beaufort Sea
0 25 5012.5 Miles
© 2105MAPMAKERS ALASKA
The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge 1002 area is the eastward extension of the North Slope coast plain. The KIC well, in Native land nearKaktovik, is the only well to have been drilled in the refuge. The findings from the well are commercially confidential.
MA
PMA
KER
S A
LASK
A
see ANWR PLAN page 24
24 PETROLEUM NEWS • WEEK OF FEBRUARY 1, 2015
www.lynden.com 1-888-596-3361
At Lynden, we understand that plans change but deadlines don’t. That’s why we proudly offer our exclusive
Dynamic Routing system. Designed to work around your unique requirements, Dynamic Routing allows you
to choose the mode of transportation — air, sea or land — to control the speed of your deliveries so they
arrive just as they are needed. With Lynden, you only pay for the speed you need!
Only pay for the speed you need... Dynamic Routing!SM
opportunities associated with future
development of the potential resources in
the coastal plain.”
Environmentalist supportBy contrast, environmental organiza-
tions have expressed their widespread
support of a potential wilderness designa-
tion for ANWR.
“We applaud and thank President
Obama for adopting a conservation plan
that for the first time proposes to desig-
nate a large portion of the pristine Arctic
National Wildlife Refuge as wilderness
to protect it from exploitation and devel-
opment. We call on Congress to follow
the president’s lead,” said Trip Van
Noppen, president of Earthjustice.
“Known as ‘The Sacred Place Where
Life Begins’ to Alaska Native communi-
ties and teeming with rare wildlife, this is
a place of incalculable beauty and value,
to be protected like Yellowstone and
Yosemite, not turned into another pollut-
ed oil patch.”
For its part, the Fish and Wildlife
Service said in the ANWR EIS that its
decision was based on a thorough analy-
sis of the environmental, social and eco-
nomic considerations presented in its
revised ANWR plan and in the EIS. The
agency said that the EIS it did not address
oil and gas development or seismic sur-
veying because ANILCA prohibits oil
and gas operations in ANWR without
approval by Congress. l
including a sale from the current 2012-
2017 lease sale plan.
Alaskans protestPresident Obama’s withdrawal of
areas of the Chukchi and Beaufort seas
from future lease sales has triggered
protests from Alaska officials.
“This administration is determined to
shut down oil and gas production in
Alaska’s federal areas — and this off-
shore plan is yet another example of their
short-sighted thinking,” said U.S. Sen.
Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, the chairman
of the Senate Energy and Natural
Resources Committee. “The president’s
indefinite withdrawal of broad areas of
the Beaufort and Chukchi seas is the same
unilateral approach this administration is
taking in placing restrictions on the vast
energy resources in ANWR and the NPR-
A.”
“With today’s announcement, the
Obama administration’s assault on Alaska
moves from blocking development
opportunities on millions of acres of land
to taking enormous portions of the Arctic
offshore off the table,” said Congressman
Don Young, R-Alaska. “In defiance of all
statewide elected officials and the Alaska
legislature, this president has once again
thumbed his nose at the Alaskan people as
he opens another front in his ongoing war
against our people, our communities, and
our social and economic future.”
“The hits just keep coming from the
federal government for Alaskans who
want to control their own economic
future,” said Kara Moriarty, president and
CEO of the Alaska Oil and Gas
Association. “The proposed OCS pro-
gram released today by the U.S.
Department of the Interior and the Bureau
of Ocean and Energy Management prom-
ises more delay, more uncertainty, and
more restrictions.”
Environmentalist responseEnvironmental organizations, while
welcoming restrictions on leasing in areas
such as the Hanna Shoal, blasted the
Obama administration’s decision to
schedule further lease sale for the Arctic
outer continental shelf.
“The Arctic Ocean is the worst possi-
ble place we could allow drilling. The
push to develop the region has put our
oceans at risk, led to controversy, litiga-
tion, government investigations, and, in
2012, near disaster,” said Jacqueline
Savitz, Oceana’s vice president for the
United States. “While we are disappoint-
ed by the inclusion of the Arctic in the
five-year program, we applaud the presi-
dent’s action to protect Hanna Shoal and
coastal areas along the Chukchi Sea and
in the Beaufort Sea.”
“Now is not the time to prospect for
new reserves in the Arctic Ocean,” said
Erik Grafe, staff attorney for Earthjustice.
“President Obama rightly precluded leas-
ing in some important areas in the Arctic
Ocean. But, to protect those areas, the
region, and the planet, the president must
keep any new Arctic Ocean leasing out of
the five-year plan.”
In its next step toward issuing a final
five-year outer continental shelf lease sale
plan the Department of the Interior will
develop a draft environmental impact
statement, or EIS, for the plan. There will
be 60-day public comment period follow-
ing the publication of the draft plan and a
notice of intent for the EIS in the Federal
Register. l
continued from page 23
ANWR PLANcontinued from page 22
OCS SALES
over the GMT1 area and progress engi-
neering.”
The company said in April 2013 that it
would begin the regulatory and permit-
ting phase of the project and conduct
engineering leading to project approval.
It submitted permit applications in July
2013.
The Bureau of Land Management
issued a final supplemental environmen-
tal impact statement for GMT1 in
October, and while BLM’s preferred
alternative includes a road, the road and
pad are not ConocoPhillips’ preferred
alternative. BLM has yet to issue a record
of decision.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
however, issued its record of decision and
wetlands permits in January, and chose
the ConocoPhillips’ alternative as its
environmentally preferred alternative and
the least environmentally damaging prac-
ticable alternative. ConocoPhillips said
when the Corps’ decision was issued that
BLM’s mitigation measures “must be
acceptable in order for the project to
move forward for consideration by our
senior management.”
BLM has yet to issue its record of
decision.
Johansen said ConocoPhillips sup-
ports the Corps’ decision.
“The alternative they have selected
has the least environmental footprint and
requires the least amount of gravel,” he
said, adding that the Corps’ decision has
the support of the Kuukpik village corpo-
ration, Arctic Slope Regional Corp., the
city of Nuiqsut, the North Slope
Borough, Alaska’s congressional delega-
tion and Alaska’s governor.
—KRISTEN NELSON
continued from page 1
SLOWING PACE