Post on 30-Mar-2015
The Debt market in Chile
Rodrigo CifuentesBank of England
October 21st, 2005
Outline
I. Public and private debt in local currency up to 1997.
II. The impact of the Asian crisis in the Debt market.
III. Policies to support the Debt market.
IV. Current issues and challenges.
I. Public and private debt in local currency up to 1997
Facts:• 1980s: Central Bank issues public debt to finance costs of
banking crisis of 1983.• 1989: Flat-coupon, various maturities up to 20 years,
indexed.• Maturity of bonds issued varies over time (4,6,8,12,14,20
yr).
Key determinants of viability of long-term market:• Credibility in UF (institutions).• Demand by institutional investors, Pension Funds (PF)
and Life Insurance Companies (LIC).
I. Public and private debt in local currency up to 1997
Facts:• Volumes issued by the Central Bank continue to
increase as consequence of exchange rate policy. • Private debt market exists but is relatively small.Why?:• 80s: Investment restrictions of PFs and LICs.• 90s: Cost of Funds lower abroad.
– Exchange rate regime: Risks not internalised neither by supply nor demand.
– International markets willing to take ‘Chile risk’.
II. The impact of the Asian crisis in the Debt market
Facts:• Flows of funds to emerging market economies
reverse.• Large increases in sovereign risk spread.• Exchange rate policy: Free float since 1999.• Banks are explicitly required to consider currency
mismatches of borrowers in credit risk assessment (capital cost to them)
II. The impact of the Asian crisis in the Debt market
Consequences on incentives to market participants:• Companies with previous acces to international
markets, turn to local market.• Development of local expertise in fixed-income
securities: Lower cost to new companies to issue debt.
• Fall in yields imply institutional investors more active in search for return.– Role of Investment Banks
II. The impact of the Asian crisis in the Debt market
Impact on Market:• Placements of debt in local market increase in 1998-
2000, and further from 2001 onwards.• Second increase due to new companies.
Total amount and number of PlacementsMillions of USD
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005(Jan-Sep)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Amount (LHS) Number (RHS)
Companies with debt and amounts outstandingMillions of USD
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005(Jan-Sep)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Amount Oustanding (LHS) Companies with debt (RHS)
II. The impact of the Asian crisis in the Debt market
Impact on Market:• Placements of debt in local market increase in 1998-
2000, and further from 2001 onwards.• Second increase due to new companies.• Market segmented in two tranches: 5-year for PF, 20-
year for LIC.
Placements by maturityUSD million
Source: SVS
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004
0 - 5 yrs 5 - 10 yrs 10 - 15 yrs 15 - 20 yrs 25 - + yrs Más de 25
Placements by ObjectiveUSD million
Source: SVS
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004
Investment Inv and Refinancing Refinancing General Securitised
II. The impact of the Asian crisis in the Debt market
Impact on Market:• Placements of debt in local market increase in 1998-
2000, and further from 2001 onwards.• Second increase due to new companies.• Market segmented in two tranches: 5-year for PF, 20-
year for LIC.However:• New companies with profile too similar to those of
before: Regulated services sectors, and/or large companies.
Outstanding Debt by sectorUSD Billions
Source: SVS
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04
Regulated Services Natural Resources Other Retail Financiero Public Infrastructure
II. The impact of the Asian crisis in the Debt market
Impact on Market:• Placements of debt in local market increase in 1998-
2000, and further from 2001 onwards.• Second increase due to new companies.• Market segmented in two tranches: 5-year for PF, 20-
year for LIC.However:• New companies with profile too similar to those of
before: Regulated services sectors, and/or large companies.
• Liquidity falls at the end of 90s:– Mergers in PF and Banks– Rise in interest rates in 1998
Liquidity in fixed-income
Yearly transactions over stock
* Mortgage-backed securities, corporate bonds and public sector debt
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05
III. Policies to support the Debt market
• 2002: Fourteen years after start of issuing marketable debt, CB changes structructure of bonds issued.– Bullet– Matutirities comparable internationally: 2, 5, 10 and 20-years– Benchmark issues: less types of bonds in the market to
increase depth of any issue and, hence, liquidity.– Start issuing nominal (peso) bonds in maturities higher than
1 year (2 and 5).
• Other debt market-friendly reforms:– Capital Markets Reform I (Commercial paper).
Denomination and Term structure of Central Bank DebtMillions of USD; December 2003, June 2004, December 2004, August 2005
Source: Central Bank of Chile
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
0 - 1m 1m - 6m 6m - 1yr 1yr - 2yr 2yr - 5yr 5yr - 10yr 10yr - +
Nominal CPI-Indexed Dollar
Stock of Central Bank DebtUSD Million
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
Jan-02 May-02 Sep-02 Jan-03 May-03 Sep-03 Jan-04 May-04 Sep-04 Jan-05 May-05
BCP BCU CEROS PRC
Liquidity of Central Bank DebtRatio of transactions in the Santiago Stock Exchange over Stock outstanding
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
Jan-02 May-02 Sep-02 Jan-03 May-03 Sep-03 Jan-04 May-04 Sep-04 Jan-05 May-05
BCP BCU CEROS PRC
Yields on 5yr bondspercentage
Source: Banco Central de Chile
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Sep-02 Jan-03 May-03 Sep-03 Jan-04 May-04 Sep-04 Jan-05 May-05
Nominal
CPI Indexed
Spread
Yields on 10yr bondspercentage
Source: Banco Central de Chile
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Jul-04 Sep-04 Nov-04 Jan-05 Mar-05 May-05 Jul-05
Nominal
Spread
CPI Indexed
IV. Current issues and challenges
• Expand market to medium-size companies.– Act on regulation to investments of PFs and LICs.
• Nominal debt– Central Bank issued 10-year nominal bond in 2004. – Nominal debt: Credibility replaces indexation. Macro benefit:
indexation makes real adjustment of prices more difficult.– Difficult to change market conventions: Nominal private debt
issues still scarce. Why, if inflation is low?
• International investors– Nominal debt may make this easier (UF implied entry costs)
IV. Current issues and challenges
• Financial Stability:Delivery versus Payments
• Refinancing on lower rates (2004): Prepayments, Replacement cost (LICs)– Learning-by-doing, now more attention on covenants.
Pricing of risks more precise.