TGYS Data Interpretation and Reporting Results

Post on 22-Feb-2016

46 views 0 download

Tags:

description

TGYS Data Interpretation and Reporting Results. Peter Chen, PhD Julie Gibbs, BSW Julie Maertens, MS Julie Sampson, MS Stefanie Putter, BA. Objectives. Roadmap. Program evaluation review Discussion of your data: Desired evaluation results Factors affecting your results - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of TGYS Data Interpretation and Reporting Results

TGYS Data Interpretation and Reporting Results

Peter Chen, PhDJulie Gibbs, BSW

Julie Maertens, MSJulie Sampson, MSStefanie Putter, BA

Objectives

Gain ConfidenceApply your KnowledgeMake Connections

Roadmap

Program evaluation reviewDiscussion of your data:

Desired evaluation results Factors affecting your results Comparison data

Next steps

Program Evaluation Cycle

1. Create logic model2. Decide on a design

3. Pick measurement tool4. Data analysis

5. Data reporting & reflection

Evaluation Terms

Sample/Sample Size Scale/MeasureSubscale Mean Comparison/Aggregate Data Norms

Statistical Terms

T-testP-valuep<.05Effect Size

Effect Size Benchmarks

<.20 = small

.21-.79 = moderate

.80-1.00 = large

Example

=

Pre-Tests: 55

Post-Tests: 38

Matched tests: 38

Sample Data Report

Coping Strategies Mean N Std. DeviationDesired Direction of

Change?Sig. Effect Size

Direct problem solving – PRE 2.64 739 0.68Yes 0.66 0.02

Direct problem solving – POST 2.66 739 0.68

Control – PRE 2.55 736 0.68Yes 0.01* 0.11

Control – POST 2.62 736 0.71

Support for feeling – PRE 2.35 737 0.83Yes 0.09 0.07

Support for feeling – POST 2.41 737 0.82

Support for actions – PRE 2.31 737 0.68Yes 0.00* 0.14

Support for actions – POST 2.41 737 0.69

Total coping strategies mean – PRE 2.45 741 0.59

Yes 0.01* 0.11Total coping strategies mean - POST 2.52 741 0.60

Potential Influences

Tracking

Data Management

AttritionConfidentiality

Your Sample

Participant Tracking

Data Management Fill in bubbles completely with pencil Fill in the entire administrative

sectionDon’t use photocopies

Comparison DataHow does your agency compare to other

TGYS grantees?Are you surprised by these differences?Would you expect these differences?

Results Justification

Results

People Effects

Program Effects

Next StepsDiscuss results with key staffLearn from other granteesContact your TGYS technical evaluator

CSU team contact information:

Julie Maertens: jmtgys@lamar.colostate.eduJulie Sampson: jstgys@lamar.colostate.eduStefanie Putter: sptgys@lamar.colostate.edu

You can also check out our website!