Simple Reporting of Complex DNA Evidence: Automated Computer Interpretation

23
Simple Reporting of Simple Reporting of Complex DNA Evidence: Complex DNA Evidence: Automated Computer Automated Computer Interpretation Interpretation Promega 14th International Symposium Promega 14th International Symposium on Human Identification on Human Identification Pointe Hilton Tapatio Cliffs Resort Pointe Hilton Tapatio Cliffs Resort Phoenix, AZ Phoenix, AZ October, 2003 October, 2003

description

Simple Reporting of Complex DNA Evidence: Automated Computer Interpretation. Promega 14th International Symposium on Human Identification Pointe Hilton Tapatio Cliffs Resort Phoenix, AZ October, 2003. Single source: Peak  allele. At locus, report the genotype. . Data Issues: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Simple Reporting of Complex DNA Evidence: Automated Computer Interpretation

Page 1: Simple Reporting of  Complex DNA Evidence:  Automated Computer Interpretation

Simple Reporting of Simple Reporting of Complex DNA Evidence: Complex DNA Evidence:

Automated Computer InterpretationAutomated Computer Interpretation

Promega 14th International SymposiumPromega 14th International Symposiumon Human Identificationon Human Identification

Pointe Hilton Tapatio Cliffs ResortPointe Hilton Tapatio Cliffs ResortPhoenix, AZPhoenix, AZ

October, 2003October, 2003

Page 2: Simple Reporting of  Complex DNA Evidence:  Automated Computer Interpretation
Page 3: Simple Reporting of  Complex DNA Evidence:  Automated Computer Interpretation

Single source:Single source:Peak Peak allele. allele.At locus,At locus,report thereport thegenotype. genotype.

Page 4: Simple Reporting of  Complex DNA Evidence:  Automated Computer Interpretation

Data Issues:Data Issues:Peak height/areaPeak height/areaPeak sizePeak sizePCR stutterPCR stutterPref ampPref ampMixed samplesMixed samplesLow amountsLow amountsDegraded DNADegraded DNAMany samplesMany samplesMany contributorsMany contributorsContributor countContributor countBackground noiseBackground noiseRandom variationRandom variationLCN PCRLCN PCR

Page 5: Simple Reporting of  Complex DNA Evidence:  Automated Computer Interpretation

Math/stat models:Math/stat models:Peak height/areaPeak height/areaPeak sizePeak sizePCR stutterPCR stutterPref ampPref ampMixed samplesMixed samplesLow amountsLow amountsDegraded DNADegraded DNAMany samplesMany samplesMany contributorsMany contributorsContributor countContributor countBackground noiseBackground noiseRandom variationRandom variationLCN PCRLCN PCR

Single source:Single source:Peak Peak allele. allele.At locus,At locus,for contributor,for contributor,report thereport thegenotype(s). genotype(s).

Page 6: Simple Reporting of  Complex DNA Evidence:  Automated Computer Interpretation

Recent RevolutionsRecent Revolutions

• • science science PCR, sequencerPCR, sequencer

• • technologytechnologycomputercomputer

• • lawlawDaubertDaubert

• • statisticsstatisticscomputational truthcomputational truth

Page 7: Simple Reporting of  Complex DNA Evidence:  Automated Computer Interpretation

TrueAllele™TrueAllele™

Expert systemExpert systema computer program thata computer program thatreplicates human expertisereplicates human expertise

HistoryHistory

System: System: 2 2 3 3Version: Version: 14 14 15 15

Page 8: Simple Reporting of  Complex DNA Evidence:  Automated Computer Interpretation

Admissibility Admissibility

Rule 702Rule 7021.1. DataData2.2. MethodMethod3.3. ApplicationApplication

DaubertDaubert1.1. TestableTestable2.2. Error rateError rate3.3. Peer reviewPeer review4.4. General acceptanceGeneral acceptance

Page 9: Simple Reporting of  Complex DNA Evidence:  Automated Computer Interpretation

Validation DesignValidation Design

10%10%30%30%50%50%70%70%90%90%

1, 1/2, 1/4, 1/8 ng1, 1/2, 1/4, 1/8 ng

Page 10: Simple Reporting of  Complex DNA Evidence:  Automated Computer Interpretation

STR Data GenerationSTR Data Generation

• • premixed DNA templates: premixed DNA templates: NISTNIST• • lab protocols: lab protocols: CybergeneticsCybergenetics• • data generation (ten DNA labs)data generation (ten DNA labs) Florida, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Florida, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Cellmark, UK FSS, CybergeneticsVirginia, Cellmark, UK FSS, Cybergenetics• • DNA sequencers:DNA sequencers: FMBio/II, 377, 310, 3100, 3700FMBio/II, 377, 310, 3100, 3700• • STR panels: STR panels: PowerPlex (1, 2, 16), PowerPlex (1, 2, 16), ProfilerPlus, Cofiler, SGMplus, IdentifilerProfilerPlus, Cofiler, SGMplus, Identifiler

Page 11: Simple Reporting of  Complex DNA Evidence:  Automated Computer Interpretation

Data AnalysisData AnalysisTrueAllele™ AutomationTrueAllele™ Automation

sequencersequencerdata filedata file

peak height databasepeak height database

analysisanalysis

Page 12: Simple Reporting of  Complex DNA Evidence:  Automated Computer Interpretation
Page 13: Simple Reporting of  Complex DNA Evidence:  Automated Computer Interpretation
Page 14: Simple Reporting of  Complex DNA Evidence:  Automated Computer Interpretation

Case InterpretationCase InterpretationTrueAllele™ AutomationTrueAllele™ Automation

sequencersequencerdata filedata file

peak height databasepeak height database

reportreport

analysisanalysis

interpretationinterpretation

Page 15: Simple Reporting of  Complex DNA Evidence:  Automated Computer Interpretation

No Suspect ExampleNo Suspect Example

ContributorsContributorsA: VictimA: Victim

G: Unknown SuspectG: Unknown Suspect

SamplesSamplesA1 (Victim)A1 (Victim)

C1 (Mixture) C1 (Mixture) 70% A 70% A ++ 30% G30% G

1 ng DNA, PowerPlex16, ABI/3101 ng DNA, PowerPlex16, ABI/310

Page 16: Simple Reporting of  Complex DNA Evidence:  Automated Computer Interpretation
Page 17: Simple Reporting of  Complex DNA Evidence:  Automated Computer Interpretation

Simplicity GoalsSimplicity Goals

• • time time < 1 minute< 1 minute• • information information full powerfull power• • understandable understandable yesyes• • admissible admissible yesyes

1,440 minutes each day1,440 minutes each dayBacklog?Backlog?(no suspect, convicted offender)(no suspect, convicted offender)

Page 18: Simple Reporting of  Complex DNA Evidence:  Automated Computer Interpretation

10 11 12

ConservativeConservative ExactExact101010111112

101112111212

10 12CautiousCautious101112

121212

Discriminating PowerDiscriminating Power

Page 19: Simple Reporting of  Complex DNA Evidence:  Automated Computer Interpretation

26/2626/26 18/2618/263.6x103.6x101616 6.1x106.1x101111

Concordance: DPConcordance: DPSynthetic: NIJ study comparisonsSynthetic: NIJ study comparisonsCases: 1,000 no suspect rape kitsCases: 1,000 no suspect rape kits

Page 20: Simple Reporting of  Complex DNA Evidence:  Automated Computer Interpretation

Lab Process ScenariosLab Process Scenarios• • screen data, organize casescreen data, organize case• • second scorer reviewsecond scorer review• • post-conviction DNA testingpost-conviction DNA testing• • service for DNA analystservice for DNA analyst• • NDIS forensic uploadNDIS forensic upload• • NDIS profile downloadNDIS profile download• • mass disastersmass disasters• • serial crimeserial crime• • advance troubleshootingadvance troubleshooting• …• …

Page 21: Simple Reporting of  Complex DNA Evidence:  Automated Computer Interpretation
Page 22: Simple Reporting of  Complex DNA Evidence:  Automated Computer Interpretation

ConclusionsConclusions

• • timetime• • informationinformation• • understandableunderstandable• • admissibleadmissible

casework interpretation systemcasework interpretation system: : objective, unbiased, reproducible, objective, unbiased, reproducible, reliable, admissible, availablereliable, admissible, availablereportsreports:: simple, understandable simple, understandablestudiesstudies:: concordance, validation concordance, validation

Page 23: Simple Reporting of  Complex DNA Evidence:  Automated Computer Interpretation

AcknowledgementsAcknowledgementsNational Institute of Justice: National Institute of Justice: Award #2001-IJ-CX-K003Award #2001-IJ-CX-K003

Collaborators at: Collaborators at: Florida, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Florida, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, NIST, Cellmark, UK FSSVirginia, NIST, Cellmark, UK FSS

Cybergenetics: Cybergenetics: Developers, Quality Process, DNA LabDevelopers, Quality Process, DNA Lab

[email protected]@cybgen.com