Post on 20-Jan-2016
description
Sunray Independent School Sunray Independent School DistrictDistrict
20072007
AEISAEIS
Performance Performance Report Report
District and Campus Ratings
District Acceptable
High School Acceptable
Middle School Recognized
Elementary Recognized
2007 TAKS Results Subgroups
0
10
2030
4050
6070
8090
100
LA/Read Math Writing Science SS
DistrictHispanicWhiteEco.DisSp. EdLEPAt-Risk
2007 TAKS Results Subgroups/Compared to State &
Region Results
010
2030
4050
6070
8090
100
LA/Read Math Writing Science SS
StateRegion 16DistrictHispanicWhiteEco.DisSp. EdLEPAt-Risk
3rd Grade
0
10
2030
4050
6070
8090
100
Reading Math Writing
3rd-033rd-043rd-053rd-063rd-07
4th Grade Longitudinal
74
76
78
80
82
84
86
88
90
92
Reading Math Writing Science
3rd-064th-07
5th Grade Longitudinal
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Reading Math Writing Science
3rd-054th-065th-07
6th Grade Longitudinal
0
1020
3040
5060
708090
100
Reading Math Writing Science
3rd-044th-055th-066th-07
7th Grade Longitudinal
50
60
70
80
90
100
Reading Math Writing Science
3rd-034th-045th-056th-067th-07
8th Grade Longitudinal
50
60
70
80
90
100
Reading Math Writing Science SS
4th -035th -046th-057th-068th-07
9th Grade Longitudinal
50
60
70
80
90
100
Reading Math Science Writing SS
5th-036th-047th-058th-069th-07
10th Grade Longitudinal
50
60
70
80
90
100
Reading Math Writing Soc Stud Science
6th-037th-048th-059th-0610th-07
11th Grade Longitudinal
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Reading Math Writing SS Science
7th-03
8th-04
9th-05
10th-06
11th-07
SDAA Examinations
50
60
70
80
90
100
Read/LA Math Writing
200320042005200620072007 - State2007 - Region
2004/2005 TAKS/SDAA Participation
0102030405060708090
100
Total SDAA
State-07State-06State-05Region-07Region-06Region-05Sunray-07Sunray-06Sunray-05
Criteria for meeting AYP:
1. AYP performance requirements are met if the percent Met Standard for all students and each student group summed across grades 3-8 and 10 in reading/language arts and mathematics meets or exceeds AYP standard.
• The AYP standards for 2002-2003 and 2003-2004 are 46.8 percent for reading/language arts and 33.4 percent for mathematics based on a formula provided by USDE. The 2004-2005/2005-2006 standard is 53% for reading/language arts and 42% for mathematics. The2006-2007 standard is 60% for reading/language arts and 50% for mathematics.
• The AYP standards gradually increase.
• By 2013-2014, the standards are 100 percent for both reading/language arts and mathematics.
2. AYP participation requires 95 percent of all students and each student group to be tested to meet participation requirements, calculated separately for reading & math.
3. Other AYP requirements must be met for all students: 70% graduation rates for high schools and 90% attendance rates for middle and elementary schools.
District & Campus AYP
• Meets AYP and Participation
TELPAS – At Least One Proficiency Level Increase in
English Reading
• 3rd -5th 9/17 52%
• 6th-8th 5/11 45%
• 9-11th 3/12 25%
TELPAS - % LEP with Advanced /Advanced High Rating in English
Reading
• 3rd-5th 35%• 6th-8th 42%• 9-12th 62%Advanced –High
• 3rd-5th 35%• 6th-8th 38%• 9-12th 23%
Advanced
Attendance Rates
90
95
100
State
Region16Sunray
00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06• State 95.5 95.6 95.6 95.7 95.7 95.5• Region 16 95.7 95.5 95.6 95.8 95.7 95.6• Sunray 97.2 96.7 96.8 97.3 96.7 96.9
7th and 8th Drop-out Rate
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
'05-06 '04-05
State Region16 Sunray
'05-06 '04-05State 0.4 0.2Region16 0.2 0.1Sunray 0 0
Completion Rate
05
101520253035404550556065707580859095
100
State Region District
Grad. 04Grad. 05Grad. 06GED 04GED 05GED 06HS 04HS 05HS 06DO-4yr. 04DO-4yr. 05DO -4yr. 06
Retention RatesGrade Level District State
K 0 2.9
1 2.6 6.0
2 5.7 3.6
3 0 3.0
4 0 1.8
5 0 2.9
6 0 1.2
7 0 2.2
8 0 1.6
% in Advanced Courses• 2003 2004 2005 2006• State 19.7 19.9 20.5 21.0• Region16 17.4 18.2 17.7 17.7• Sunray 23.3 21.1 23.2 24.1
0
5
10
15
20
25
2003 2004 2005 2006
State Region16 Sunray
RHSP/DAP Graduates
• 2006– State 75.7– ESC 16 71.8– Sunray 94.3
• 2005– State 72.3– ESC 16 66.6– Sunray 87.1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2006 2005
State
ESC 16
Sunray
TSI – Higher Education Readiness Component
2007• English
– State 53– ESC 16 52– Sunray 53
• Math– State 54– ESC 16 52– Sunray 53
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
English Math
State
ESC 16
Sunray
SAT/ACT TEST DATA
2005 2006
STATE REGION16 SUNRAY
SAT Mean Score
992 991
1041 1038
* *
ACT Mean
Score 20.0 20.1
20.4 20.2
20.0 20.2
Sunray Elementary
AEIS
2007
Subject
Year
State SES Hisp White Sp Ed
Eco D LEP
Reading 2007
89% 91% 84% 100% * 89% 57%
Reading
2006
90% 92% 92% 91% * * *
Math 2007
82% 70% 63% 79% * 61% 29%
Math
2006
83% 81% 86% 75% * 67% *
SES TAKS Data from AEIS
Grade 3 Summary: Saw a significant decrease in mathematics performance for All students, Hispanic students and LEP students. In reading, scores remained constant for all students with a decrease percent passing for Hispanic students.
Grade 3
Subject. State SES Hisp White Sp Ed Eco D LEP
Read 07 84% 87% 88% 86% * 85% *
Read 06 83% 79% 69% 87% * 62% *
Math 07 86% 87% 94% 79% * 92% *
Math 06 84% 68% 57% 76% * 38% *
Writ 07 91% 80% 75% 86% * 77% *
Writ 06 92% 73% 62% 82% * 53% *
SES TAKS Data from AEISGrade 4
Grade 4 Summary: Made improvements at grade 4 in most sub-groups in Reading, Math, & Writing. Writing improved in each sub-group, but continues to be the lowest area for the grade level. Economically disadvantaged group performed much better in all areas, but especially mathematics.
SES TAKS Data from AEIS
Subject State SES Hisp. White Sp Ed Eco Dis LEP
Read/ ELA 07
89% 90% 89% 93% * 87% 70%
Read/
ELA 06
87% 88% 85% 92% * 71% 67%
Math 07 77% 78% 77% 79% * 74% 40%
Math 06 75% 74% 71% 76% * 45% 43%
Writing 07
92% 80% 75% 86% * 77% *
Writing 06
91% 73% 62% 82% * 53% *
Accountability Subset
Campus Summary: Saw an increase in every subject area and sub-group in reading, mathematics & writing except LEP math. LEP students continue to perform significantly lower than other sub-groups in all subjects areas, but especially mathematics.
SES Attendance Data from AEIS
Attendance State SES Hisp White Sp Ed Eco D LEP
2005-06 95.5% 96.9% 97.0% 96.7% 96.4% 97.4% 97.2%
2004-05 95.7% 96.8% 97.3% 96.4% 97.0% 96.5% 97.8%
Decrease
Increase-0.2% +0.1% -0.3% +0.3% -0.6% +0.9% -0.6%
Summary: Attendance increased overall for the campus. Had an increase in attendance for the white and economically disadvantaged sub-groups, but a decrease in the Hispanic, special education & LEP sub-groups.
Strategies for Attendance Improvement
• Attendance Incentive Program
• CAT Monitoring Teams
• Parent Notification Letter
• Saturday School and Summer School
Strategies for TAKS Improvement
• Use of Released Tests • Practice testing on computerized assessment
to diagnosis during the school year• Use of TAKS Practice Materials• Reading Specialist and Intensive Instruction• Accelerated Reading Instruction (after school)• Accelerated Math Instruction (after school)• Bobcat Breakout Lab
Subject
Year
State SMS Hisp White Sp Ed Eco D LEP
Reading
2007
90% 90% 79% 99% NA 81% NA
Reading 2006
89% 89% 82% 99% NA 82% NA
Math
2007
91% 94% 86% 99% NA 88% NA
Math 2006 90% 93% 89% 99% NA 82% NA
Science
2007
78% 86% 77% 94% NA 82% NA
Science
2006
76% 81% 75% 91% NA 70% NA
SMS TAKS Data from AEISGrade 5
Grade 5 Summary: These results include the second administrations in math and reading. Reading scores continue to stay high in most groups. Math did very well on the second administration of the test to bring the scores to their present levels. Science went up in all subgroups and well above state average.
Subject
Year
State SMS Hisp White Sp Ed
Eco D LEP
Reading
2007
92% 100% 100% 100% NA 100% NA
Reading 2006
92% 93% 94% 92% NA 95% NA
Math
2007
80% 79% 67% 100% NA 67% NA
Math 2006
81% 91% 94% 88% NA 89% NA
SMS TAKS Data from AEISGrade 6
Grade 6 Summary: Reading scores were perfect for this group of students. Math scores dropped from 2006, especially in the Eco. Disadvantaged and the Hispanic subgroup.
Subject
Year
State SMS Hisp White Sp Ed Eco D LEP
Reading
2007
85% 89% 84% 93% NA 82% NA
Reading 2006
80% 87% 88% 86% NA 82% NA
Math
2007
77% 91% 95% 89% NA 91% NA
Math
2006
71% 82% 88% 77% NA 76% NA
Writing
2007
100% 100% 100% 100% NA 100% NA
Writing
2006
89% 87% 84% 89% NA% 86% NA%
SMS TAKS Data from AEISGrade 7
Grade 7 Summary: All subgroups are in 80’s. This is one of our strongest classes this year.
Subject
Year
State SMS Hisp White Sp Ed Eco D LEP
Reading
2007
89% 88% 91% 85% NA 82% NA
Reading 2006 84% 77% 59% 91% NA 46% NA
Math
2007
73% 81% 86% 75% NA 73% NA
Math
2006
68% 79% 59% 95% NA 62% NA
Social Studies
2007
87% 88% 82% 95% NA 82% NA
Social Studies
2006
84% 82% 65% 95% NA 62% NA
SMS TAKS Data from AEISGrade 8
Grade 8 Summary: Most of our subgroups in Reading went up, as well as major increases in the Social Studies subgroups. Math stayed well above state averages, however, some sub-groups are still in the 75% range.
SMS Attendance Data from AEIS
Attendance State SMS Hisp White Sp Ed Eco D LEP
05-06
95.5% 96.9% 97.3% 96.5% 95.3% 96.8% 96.9%
04-05
95.7% 96.6% 96.4% 96.8% 95.6% 96.1% 96.9%
Decrease
Increase
-.2% +.3% +.9% -.3% -.3% +.7% Even
We want these % to increase each year. Small decreases from 04-05 in a couple of subgroups, 8TH graders have brought down the overall average the last couple of years. Gold Performance Acknowledgement for Attendance.
Strategies for Attendance Improvement
• Attendance Incentive Program with recognition every six weeks for perfect attendance.
• CAT team Monitoring• Parents called when students do not show
up for more than one day of school.• Parent Notification for students that miss
extreme numbers of days.• Saturday School
Strategies for TAKS Improvement
• Use of Released Tests and other benchmarking methods
• Use of TAG on D-MAC program to make tests for benchmarking.
• Use of TAKS Practice Materials including Measuring Up for Math, Science and some Reading.
• Coach – supplemental materials • My Reading Coach for struggling readers• Use of Bobcat Breakout for those students struggling
and falling behind in classroom assignments.
Sunray Middle School
Gold Performance Acknowledgements:Attendance 2005-2006Reading/ELAWritingScience (5th grade)Comparable Improvement Math Comparable Improvement on
ELA/Reading
Sunray High School AEIS2007
Subject
Year
State SHS Hisp White Sp Ed
Eco D LEP
Reading
2007
87% 85% 71% 99% NA 65% 20%
Reading 2006
88% 98% 94% 99% NA 99% NA
Math
2007
61% 80% 65% 95% NA 65% 33%
Math 2006
58% 62% 44% 75% NA 45% NA
2007 SHS TAKS Data from AEIS
Grade 9 Summary: Reading is down in all subgroups except the white subgroup. Math is up at 9th in all subgroups.
Grade 9
Subject. State SHS Hisp White Sp Ed Eco D LEP
ELA 07 85% 93% 90% 96% NA 92% 0%
ELA 06 86% 92% 85% 99% NA 83% NA
Math 07 65% 68% 57% 78% NA 63% NA
Math 06 62% 65% 40% 94% NA 56% NA
Sci 07 59% 57% 38% 74% NA 54% NA
Sci 06 61% 62% 40% 88% NA 50% NA
SS 07 87% 73% 62% 83% NA 67% NA
SS 06 84% 73% 50% 99% NA 56% NA
2007 SHS TAKS Data from AEISGrade 10
Grade 10 Summary: All ELA groups had increases except the white subgroup, but that subgroup is still at 96%. Good gains in Econ. Disadv. group for 07. Math had good gains in all subgroups. The Science scores were all down except for Econ. Disadv. which had a slight increase. Social Studies all came up from 06 except the white subgroup.
2007 SHS TAKS Data from AEIS
Subject
State SHS Hisp. White Sp Ed Eco Dis
LEP
ELA 07 91% 91% 83% 99% NA 81% NA
ELA 06 89% 85% 75% 94% NA 75% NA
Math 07 81% 89% 89% 88% NA 88% NA
Math 06 78% 82% 87% 78% NA 87% NA
Sci 07 78% 74% 61% 88% NA 63% NA
Sci 06 76% 64% 53% 72% NA 67% NA
SS 07 94% 89% 78% 99% NA 88% NA
SS 06 94% 85% 80% 89% NA 80% NA
Grade 11
Grade 11 Summary: ELA and Math scores were all up. Science scores were up except for Econ. Disadv. Social Studies scores were all up except for the Hispanic subgroup.
2007 SHS Attendance Data from AEIS
Attendance State SHS Hisp White Sp Ed Eco D LEP
05-06 95.5% 97.1% 96.4% 97. 6% 95.4% 96.2% 96.9%
04-05 95.7% 97.2% 96.7% 97.7% 97.0% 97.0% 96.2%
Decrease
Increase-0.2% -0.1% -0.3% -0.1% -1.6% -.8% +.7%
We want these % to increase each year. There were slight decreases overall except the LEP subgroup that had a .7% gain.
SHS Completion Rate Data from 2007 AEIS
Completion
Rate 2005State SHS Hisp White Sp Ed Eco D LEP
Grad. 84% 96.8% 100% 95.2% NA 100% NA
GED 3.8% 3.2% 0% 4.8% NA O% NA
Cont. HS 7.9% 0% 0% 0% NA 0% NA
DO (4-yr) 4.3% 0% 0% 0% NA 0% NA
Completion Rate 2006
Grad 80.4% 97.1% 100.0% 95.7% NA 100% NA
GED 2.3% 2.9% 0% 4.3% NA 0% NA
Cont. HS 8.6% 0% 0% 0% NA 0% NA
DO (4-yr) 8.8% 0% 0% 0% NA 0% NA
Our completion rate is up from 2005.
Strategies for Attendance Improvement
• Attendance Incentive Program• Exemption Policy• Bobcat Scholarship• SCAT Monitoring• Parent Notification• Saturday School and Summer School• STAR Program• Learning Lab• Morning Tutorials
Strategies for Dropout Improvement
• Timely Identification of At Risk• TAKS Remediation & Intensive Instruction• Saturday School for Attendance Problems• Credit Recovery and Accrual in Summer School and
Saturday School• SCAT Monitoring & Intervention Plans• CHAMPS Academy• Recovery with GED and CHAMPS• WBL Program• Personal Graduation Plans for At Risk• Priority of Services for Migrant Students
Strategies for TAKS Improvement• Use of Nova Net, Study Island (NEW 07-08), & Other
Computer Assisted Programs• Analysis/Use of Released State Tests• Use of TEA TAKS Study Guides• Practice /Benchmark Testing Days for Diagnosis of
Strong and Weak Areas at Mid-year• Use of TAKS Practice Materials• 1-on-1 Intensive Instruction for TAKS ELL failures• TAKS Class for Senior Retakers & (NEW 07-08) for
Juniors Who Failed 10th Grade TAKS• TAKS Intervention Time for 9th and 10th TAKS failures
(NEW Jan. 08)• Summer TAKS Class Before July Testing
Strategies for TAKS Improvement
• TAKS Conferences with Students on Objectives Failed• Individual Conferences with Parents of students who
failed TAKS• Personal Graduation Plans for TAKS Failures• Daily and/or Weekly TAKS Drills in Core Subject Classes• Individual Educational Plans for students who are ELL • Placement in Core Area Class for Senior Retakers and
all Juniors who failed TAKS (NEW 07-08)• Saturday School for ELL Students for Lang. Dev. Skills
Needed for TAKS Testing & Coursework
Accomplishments at SHSFocus on Student Service Projects
• Student Council Dinner for Senior Citizens• Drug Awareness Programs for Elementary• FCCLA Reading with Elementary, Ronald Mc
Donald House Supply Drive, Eveline Rivers Coat Drive
• NHS Meals on Wheels and Talent Show to Raise Money and Canned Food for Needy
• SHS Jr./Sr. Mentoring Program at Elementary and Middle Schools
• 9th Grade Success Class Group Service Projects at Holiday Season
Sunray High School Gold Performance Acknowledgements
2006-2007
Attendance (2005-2006)Recommended High School Program
(Class of 2006)Texas Success Initiative (TSI)
MathematicsComparable Improvement: ELA
Student Demographics• Ethnicity 2006 2007
African American .4 .2Hispanic 48.2 52.9White 50.8 46.5Native American .2 0Asian/Pacific Islander .4 .4
• Economically Disadvantaged 49.2 53.5
• Limited English Proficient14.4 16.0
• At-Risk 39 34.7
Staff Data
Sunray State
• Years Exper. 12.8 11.5– In District 7.6 7.6
• Turnover Rate 23.2 14.6
• # Teachers 47 302,149
Enrollment Projections
• 1998-99 622• 1999-00 587• 2000-01 544• 2001-02 528• 2002-03 498• 2003-04 493• 2004-05 525• 2005-06 537• 2006-07 543• 2007-08 540475
525
575
62598-9999-0000-01'01-02'02-03'03-04'04-05'05-06'06-07'07-08
Budget HistoryYear Revenue Expenditure96/97 3,445,358 3,641,76297/98 3,622,730 3,759,74298/99 3,414,683 3,510,98999/00 3,669,932 3,732,304 00/01 3,488,232 3,551,87301/02 4,869,628 4,290,25302/03 4,202,696 4,405,52603/04 3,912,864 3,735,21704/05 5,034,355 4,365,89905/06 5,173,849 4,700,58306/07 6,927,724 5,932,08007/08 5,539,115* 5,099,062*
Year Tax Rate Value Budget Results
96/97 1.46 170,977,055 -196,404
97/98 1.42 187,032,817 -137,012
98/99 1.53 172,813,464 -96,306
99/00 1.53 156,254,416 - 62,372
00/01 1.536 163,606,678 - 63,641
01/02 1.571 211,178,300 579,375**
02/03 1.572 207,182,288 202,830 **
2003/04 1.6404 206,128,110 177,647
2004/05 1.6158 247,583,890 668,456 **
2005/06 1.5885 293,320,490 669,240**
2006/2007 1.4449 341,930,020 995,644
2007/2008 1.1483 326,268,202 440,053 estimated
Fund Balance - Prior Audits96/97 1,114,216 -196,40497/98 977,205 -137,01198/99 880,899 - 96,30699/00 808,899 - 80,00000/01 801,633 - 7,26601/02 1,297,865 496,23202/03 1,095,037 -202,828*03/04 1,272,684 177,64704/05 1,941,140 668,45605/06 2,414,407 473,266 06/07 3,370.051 995,644*Maintenance Tax Note ExpendituresOptimum Fund Balance – 4,153,885
% of Budget per Category
56%
7%10%
9%
8%10%
InstructionSch. LeaderPupil Ser.Gen. Admin.Intergov.Facilities
% of Budget per Category
70%
5%
1%
3%
4%6%11%
PayrollGen. AdmPupil TransportFood ServiceExtra Curr.Maint.Other
Funding Sources
• Local Sources: Taxes 62.2%
• State & Federal Sources 37.8%
• Grants
• Gifts
Funding Sources
% of Tax Value by Category
58
18
11
121
Oil/GasLandResidentialBusinessOther