Sunray Independent School District

Sunray Independent School Sunray Independent School DistrictDistrict

20072007

AEISAEIS

Performance Performance Report Report

District and Campus Ratings

District Acceptable

High School Acceptable

Middle School Recognized

Elementary Recognized

2007 TAKS Results Subgroups

0

10

2030

4050

6070

8090

100

LA/Read Math Writing Science SS

DistrictHispanicWhiteEco.DisSp. EdLEPAt-Risk

2007 TAKS Results Subgroups/Compared to State &

Region Results

010

2030

4050

6070

8090

100

LA/Read Math Writing Science SS

StateRegion 16DistrictHispanicWhiteEco.DisSp. EdLEPAt-Risk

3rd Grade

0

10

2030

4050

6070

8090

100

Reading Math Writing

3rd-033rd-043rd-053rd-063rd-07

4th Grade Longitudinal

74

76

78

80

82

84

86

88

90

92

Reading Math Writing Science

3rd-064th-07


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90


3rd-054th-065th-07


0

1020

3040

5060

708090

100


3rd-044th-055th-066th-07


50

60

70

80

90

100


3rd-034th-045th-056th-067th-07


50

60

70

80

90

100

Reading Math Writing Science SS

4th -035th -046th-057th-068th-07


50

60

70

80

90

100

Reading Math Science Writing SS

5th-036th-047th-058th-069th-07


50

60

70

80

90

100

Reading Math Writing Soc Stud Science

6th-037th-048th-059th-0610th-07


40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Reading Math Writing SS Science

7th-03

8th-04

9th-05

10th-06

11th-07

SDAA Examinations

50

60

70

80

90

100

Read/LA Math Writing

200320042005200620072007 - State2007 - Region

2004/2005 TAKS/SDAA Participation

0102030405060708090

100

Total SDAA

State-07State-06State-05Region-07Region-06Region-05Sunray-07Sunray-06Sunray-05

Criteria for meeting AYP:

1. AYP performance requirements are met if the percent Met Standard for all students and each student group summed across grades 3-8 and 10 in reading/language arts and mathematics meets or exceeds AYP standard.

• The AYP standards for 2002-2003 and 2003-2004 are 46.8 percent for reading/language arts and 33.4 percent for mathematics based on a formula provided by USDE. The 2004-2005/2005-2006 standard is 53% for reading/language arts and 42% for mathematics. The2006-2007 standard is 60% for reading/language arts and 50% for mathematics.

• The AYP standards gradually increase.

• By 2013-2014, the standards are 100 percent for both reading/language arts and mathematics.

2. AYP participation requires 95 percent of all students and each student group to be tested to meet participation requirements, calculated separately for reading & math.

3. Other AYP requirements must be met for all students: 70% graduation rates for high schools and 90% attendance rates for middle and elementary schools.

District & Campus AYP

• Meets AYP and Participation

TELPAS – At Least One Proficiency Level Increase in

English Reading

• 3rd -5th 9/17 52%

• 6th-8th 5/11 45%

• 9-11th 3/12 25%

TELPAS - % LEP with Advanced /Advanced High Rating in English

Reading

• 3rd-5th 35%• 6th-8th 42%• 9-12th 62%Advanced –High

• 3rd-5th 35%• 6th-8th 38%• 9-12th 23%

Advanced

Attendance Rates

90

95

100

State

Region16Sunray

00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06• State 95.5 95.6 95.6 95.7 95.7 95.5• Region 16 95.7 95.5 95.6 95.8 95.7 95.6• Sunray 97.2 96.7 96.8 97.3 96.7 96.9

7th and 8th Drop-out Rate

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

'05-06 '04-05

State Region16 Sunray

'05-06 '04-05State 0.4 0.2Region16 0.2 0.1Sunray 0 0

Completion Rate

05

101520253035404550556065707580859095

100

State Region District

Grad. 04Grad. 05Grad. 06GED 04GED 05GED 06HS 04HS 05HS 06DO-4yr. 04DO-4yr. 05DO -4yr. 06

Retention RatesGrade Level District State

K 0 2.9

1 2.6 6.0

2 5.7 3.6

3 0 3.0

4 0 1.8

5 0 2.9

6 0 1.2

7 0 2.2

8 0 1.6

% in Advanced Courses• 2003 2004 2005 2006• State 19.7 19.9 20.5 21.0• Region16 17.4 18.2 17.7 17.7• Sunray 23.3 21.1 23.2 24.1

0

5

10

15

20

25

2003 2004 2005 2006

State Region16 Sunray

RHSP/DAP Graduates

• 2006– State 75.7– ESC 16 71.8– Sunray 94.3

• 2005– State 72.3– ESC 16 66.6– Sunray 87.1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2006 2005

State

ESC 16

Sunray

TSI – Higher Education Readiness Component

2007• English

– State 53– ESC 16 52– Sunray 53

• Math– State 54– ESC 16 52– Sunray 53

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

English Math

State

ESC 16

Sunray

SAT/ACT TEST DATA

2005 2006

STATE REGION16 SUNRAY

SAT Mean Score

992 991

1041 1038

* *

ACT Mean

Score 20.0 20.1

20.4 20.2

20.0 20.2

Sunray Elementary

AEIS

2007

Subject

Year

State SES Hisp White Sp Ed

Eco D LEP

Reading 2007

89% 91% 84% 100% * 89% 57%

Reading

2006

90% 92% 92% 91% * * *

Math 2007

82% 70% 63% 79% * 61% 29%

Math

2006

83% 81% 86% 75% * 67% *

SES TAKS Data from AEIS

Grade 3 Summary: Saw a significant decrease in mathematics performance for All students, Hispanic students and LEP students. In reading, scores remained constant for all students with a decrease percent passing for Hispanic students.

Grade 3

Subject. State SES Hisp White Sp Ed Eco D LEP

Read 07 84% 87% 88% 86% * 85% *

Read 06 83% 79% 69% 87% * 62% *

Math 07 86% 87% 94% 79% * 92% *

Math 06 84% 68% 57% 76% * 38% *

Writ 07 91% 80% 75% 86% * 77% *

Writ 06 92% 73% 62% 82% * 53% *

SES TAKS Data from AEISGrade 4

Grade 4 Summary: Made improvements at grade 4 in most sub-groups in Reading, Math, & Writing. Writing improved in each sub-group, but continues to be the lowest area for the grade level. Economically disadvantaged group performed much better in all areas, but especially mathematics.

SES TAKS Data from AEIS

Subject State SES Hisp. White Sp Ed Eco Dis LEP

Read/ ELA 07

89% 90% 89% 93% * 87% 70%

Read/

ELA 06

87% 88% 85% 92% * 71% 67%

Math 07 77% 78% 77% 79% * 74% 40%

Math 06 75% 74% 71% 76% * 45% 43%

Writing 07

92% 80% 75% 86% * 77% *

Writing 06

91% 73% 62% 82% * 53% *

Accountability Subset

Campus Summary: Saw an increase in every subject area and sub-group in reading, mathematics & writing except LEP math. LEP students continue to perform significantly lower than other sub-groups in all subjects areas, but especially mathematics.

SES Attendance Data from AEIS

Attendance State SES Hisp White Sp Ed Eco D LEP

2005-06 95.5% 96.9% 97.0% 96.7% 96.4% 97.4% 97.2%

2004-05 95.7% 96.8% 97.3% 96.4% 97.0% 96.5% 97.8%

Decrease

Increase-0.2% +0.1% -0.3% +0.3% -0.6% +0.9% -0.6%

Summary: Attendance increased overall for the campus. Had an increase in attendance for the white and economically disadvantaged sub-groups, but a decrease in the Hispanic, special education & LEP sub-groups.

Strategies for Attendance Improvement

• Attendance Incentive Program

• CAT Monitoring Teams

• Parent Notification Letter

• Saturday School and Summer School

Strategies for TAKS Improvement

• Use of Released Tests • Practice testing on computerized assessment

to diagnosis during the school year• Use of TAKS Practice Materials• Reading Specialist and Intensive Instruction• Accelerated Reading Instruction (after school)• Accelerated Math Instruction (after school)• Bobcat Breakout Lab

Subject

Year

State SMS Hisp White Sp Ed Eco D LEP

Reading

2007

90% 90% 79% 99% NA 81% NA

Reading 2006

89% 89% 82% 99% NA 82% NA

Math

2007

91% 94% 86% 99% NA 88% NA

Math 2006 90% 93% 89% 99% NA 82% NA

Science

2007

78% 86% 77% 94% NA 82% NA

Science

2006

76% 81% 75% 91% NA 70% NA

SMS TAKS Data from AEISGrade 5

Grade 5 Summary: These results include the second administrations in math and reading. Reading scores continue to stay high in most groups. Math did very well on the second administration of the test to bring the scores to their present levels. Science went up in all subgroups and well above state average.

Subject

Year

State SMS Hisp White Sp Ed

Eco D LEP

Reading

2007

92% 100% 100% 100% NA 100% NA

Reading 2006

92% 93% 94% 92% NA 95% NA

Math

2007

80% 79% 67% 100% NA 67% NA

Math 2006

81% 91% 94% 88% NA 89% NA


Grade 6 Summary: Reading scores were perfect for this group of students. Math scores dropped from 2006, especially in the Eco. Disadvantaged and the Hispanic subgroup.

Subject

Year


Reading

2007

85% 89% 84% 93% NA 82% NA

Reading 2006

80% 87% 88% 86% NA 82% NA

Math

2007

77% 91% 95% 89% NA 91% NA

Math

2006

71% 82% 88% 77% NA 76% NA

Writing

2007

100% 100% 100% 100% NA 100% NA

Writing

2006

89% 87% 84% 89% NA% 86% NA%


Grade 7 Summary: All subgroups are in 80’s. This is one of our strongest classes this year.

Subject

Year


Reading

2007

89% 88% 91% 85% NA 82% NA

Reading 2006 84% 77% 59% 91% NA 46% NA

Math

2007

73% 81% 86% 75% NA 73% NA

Math

2006

68% 79% 59% 95% NA 62% NA

Social Studies

2007

87% 88% 82% 95% NA 82% NA

Social Studies

2006

84% 82% 65% 95% NA 62% NA


Grade 8 Summary: Most of our subgroups in Reading went up, as well as major increases in the Social Studies subgroups. Math stayed well above state averages, however, some sub-groups are still in the 75% range.

SMS Attendance Data from AEIS

Attendance State SMS Hisp White Sp Ed Eco D LEP

05-06

95.5% 96.9% 97.3% 96.5% 95.3% 96.8% 96.9%

04-05

95.7% 96.6% 96.4% 96.8% 95.6% 96.1% 96.9%

Decrease

Increase

-.2% +.3% +.9% -.3% -.3% +.7% Even

We want these % to increase each year. Small decreases from 04-05 in a couple of subgroups, 8TH graders have brought down the overall average the last couple of years. Gold Performance Acknowledgement for Attendance.


• Attendance Incentive Program with recognition every six weeks for perfect attendance.

• CAT team Monitoring• Parents called when students do not show

up for more than one day of school.• Parent Notification for students that miss

extreme numbers of days.• Saturday School


• Use of Released Tests and other benchmarking methods

• Use of TAG on D-MAC program to make tests for benchmarking.

• Use of TAKS Practice Materials including Measuring Up for Math, Science and some Reading.

• Coach – supplemental materials • My Reading Coach for struggling readers• Use of Bobcat Breakout for those students struggling

and falling behind in classroom assignments.

Sunray Middle School

Gold Performance Acknowledgements:Attendance 2005-2006Reading/ELAWritingScience (5th grade)Comparable Improvement Math Comparable Improvement on

ELA/Reading

Sunray High School AEIS2007

Subject

Year

State SHS Hisp White Sp Ed

Eco D LEP

Reading

2007

87% 85% 71% 99% NA 65% 20%

Reading 2006

88% 98% 94% 99% NA 99% NA

Math

2007

61% 80% 65% 95% NA 65% 33%

Math 2006

58% 62% 44% 75% NA 45% NA

2007 SHS TAKS Data from AEIS

Grade 9 Summary: Reading is down in all subgroups except the white subgroup. Math is up at 9th in all subgroups.

Grade 9

Subject. State SHS Hisp White Sp Ed Eco D LEP

ELA 07 85% 93% 90% 96% NA 92% 0%

ELA 06 86% 92% 85% 99% NA 83% NA

Math 07 65% 68% 57% 78% NA 63% NA

Math 06 62% 65% 40% 94% NA 56% NA

Sci 07 59% 57% 38% 74% NA 54% NA

Sci 06 61% 62% 40% 88% NA 50% NA

SS 07 87% 73% 62% 83% NA 67% NA

SS 06 84% 73% 50% 99% NA 56% NA

2007 SHS TAKS Data from AEISGrade 10

Grade 10 Summary: All ELA groups had increases except the white subgroup, but that subgroup is still at 96%. Good gains in Econ. Disadv. group for 07. Math had good gains in all subgroups. The Science scores were all down except for Econ. Disadv. which had a slight increase. Social Studies all came up from 06 except the white subgroup.

2007 SHS TAKS Data from AEIS

Subject

State SHS Hisp. White Sp Ed Eco Dis

LEP

ELA 07 91% 91% 83% 99% NA 81% NA

ELA 06 89% 85% 75% 94% NA 75% NA

Math 07 81% 89% 89% 88% NA 88% NA

Math 06 78% 82% 87% 78% NA 87% NA

Sci 07 78% 74% 61% 88% NA 63% NA

Sci 06 76% 64% 53% 72% NA 67% NA

SS 07 94% 89% 78% 99% NA 88% NA

SS 06 94% 85% 80% 89% NA 80% NA

Grade 11

Grade 11 Summary: ELA and Math scores were all up. Science scores were up except for Econ. Disadv. Social Studies scores were all up except for the Hispanic subgroup.

2007 SHS Attendance Data from AEIS

Attendance State SHS Hisp White Sp Ed Eco D LEP

05-06 95.5% 97.1% 96.4% 97. 6% 95.4% 96.2% 96.9%

04-05 95.7% 97.2% 96.7% 97.7% 97.0% 97.0% 96.2%

Decrease

Increase-0.2% -0.1% -0.3% -0.1% -1.6% -.8% +.7%

We want these % to increase each year. There were slight decreases overall except the LEP subgroup that had a .7% gain.

SHS Completion Rate Data from 2007 AEIS

Completion

Rate 2005State SHS Hisp White Sp Ed Eco D LEP

Grad. 84% 96.8% 100% 95.2% NA 100% NA

GED 3.8% 3.2% 0% 4.8% NA O% NA

Cont. HS 7.9% 0% 0% 0% NA 0% NA

DO (4-yr) 4.3% 0% 0% 0% NA 0% NA

Completion Rate 2006

Grad 80.4% 97.1% 100.0% 95.7% NA 100% NA

GED 2.3% 2.9% 0% 4.3% NA 0% NA

Cont. HS 8.6% 0% 0% 0% NA 0% NA

DO (4-yr) 8.8% 0% 0% 0% NA 0% NA

Our completion rate is up from 2005.


• Attendance Incentive Program• Exemption Policy• Bobcat Scholarship• SCAT Monitoring• Parent Notification• Saturday School and Summer School• STAR Program• Learning Lab• Morning Tutorials

Strategies for Dropout Improvement

• Timely Identification of At Risk• TAKS Remediation & Intensive Instruction• Saturday School for Attendance Problems• Credit Recovery and Accrual in Summer School and

Saturday School• SCAT Monitoring & Intervention Plans• CHAMPS Academy• Recovery with GED and CHAMPS• WBL Program• Personal Graduation Plans for At Risk• Priority of Services for Migrant Students

Strategies for TAKS Improvement• Use of Nova Net, Study Island (NEW 07-08), & Other

Computer Assisted Programs• Analysis/Use of Released State Tests• Use of TEA TAKS Study Guides• Practice /Benchmark Testing Days for Diagnosis of

Strong and Weak Areas at Mid-year• Use of TAKS Practice Materials• 1-on-1 Intensive Instruction for TAKS ELL failures• TAKS Class for Senior Retakers & (NEW 07-08) for

Juniors Who Failed 10th Grade TAKS• TAKS Intervention Time for 9th and 10th TAKS failures

(NEW Jan. 08)• Summer TAKS Class Before July Testing


• TAKS Conferences with Students on Objectives Failed• Individual Conferences with Parents of students who

failed TAKS• Personal Graduation Plans for TAKS Failures• Daily and/or Weekly TAKS Drills in Core Subject Classes• Individual Educational Plans for students who are ELL • Placement in Core Area Class for Senior Retakers and

all Juniors who failed TAKS (NEW 07-08)• Saturday School for ELL Students for Lang. Dev. Skills

Needed for TAKS Testing & Coursework

Accomplishments at SHSFocus on Student Service Projects

• Student Council Dinner for Senior Citizens• Drug Awareness Programs for Elementary• FCCLA Reading with Elementary, Ronald Mc

Donald House Supply Drive, Eveline Rivers Coat Drive

• NHS Meals on Wheels and Talent Show to Raise Money and Canned Food for Needy

• SHS Jr./Sr. Mentoring Program at Elementary and Middle Schools

• 9th Grade Success Class Group Service Projects at Holiday Season

Sunray High School Gold Performance Acknowledgements

2006-2007

Attendance (2005-2006)Recommended High School Program

(Class of 2006)Texas Success Initiative (TSI)

MathematicsComparable Improvement: ELA

Student Demographics• Ethnicity 2006 2007

African American .4 .2Hispanic 48.2 52.9White 50.8 46.5Native American .2 0Asian/Pacific Islander .4 .4

• Economically Disadvantaged 49.2 53.5

• Limited English Proficient14.4 16.0

• At-Risk 39 34.7

Staff Data

Sunray State

• Years Exper. 12.8 11.5– In District 7.6 7.6

• Turnover Rate 23.2 14.6

• # Teachers 47 302,149

Enrollment Projections

• 1998-99 622• 1999-00 587• 2000-01 544• 2001-02 528• 2002-03 498• 2003-04 493• 2004-05 525• 2005-06 537• 2006-07 543• 2007-08 540475

525

575

62598-9999-0000-01'01-02'02-03'03-04'04-05'05-06'06-07'07-08

Budget HistoryYear Revenue Expenditure96/97 3,445,358 3,641,76297/98 3,622,730 3,759,74298/99 3,414,683 3,510,98999/00 3,669,932 3,732,304 00/01 3,488,232 3,551,87301/02 4,869,628 4,290,25302/03 4,202,696 4,405,52603/04 3,912,864 3,735,21704/05 5,034,355 4,365,89905/06 5,173,849 4,700,58306/07 6,927,724 5,932,08007/08 5,539,115* 5,099,062*

Year Tax Rate Value Budget Results

96/97 1.46 170,977,055 -196,404

97/98 1.42 187,032,817 -137,012

98/99 1.53 172,813,464 -96,306

99/00 1.53 156,254,416 - 62,372

00/01 1.536 163,606,678 - 63,641

01/02 1.571 211,178,300 579,375**

02/03 1.572 207,182,288 202,830 **

2003/04 1.6404 206,128,110 177,647

2004/05 1.6158 247,583,890 668,456 **

2005/06 1.5885 293,320,490 669,240**

2006/2007 1.4449 341,930,020 995,644

2007/2008 1.1483 326,268,202 440,053 estimated

Fund Balance - Prior Audits96/97 1,114,216 -196,40497/98 977,205 -137,01198/99 880,899 - 96,30699/00 808,899 - 80,00000/01 801,633 - 7,26601/02 1,297,865 496,23202/03 1,095,037 -202,828*03/04 1,272,684 177,64704/05 1,941,140 668,45605/06 2,414,407 473,266 06/07 3,370.051 995,644*Maintenance Tax Note ExpendituresOptimum Fund Balance – 4,153,885

% of Budget per Category

56%

7%10%

9%

8%10%

InstructionSch. LeaderPupil Ser.Gen. Admin.Intergov.Facilities

% of Budget per Category

70%

5%

1%

3%

4%6%11%

PayrollGen. AdmPupil TransportFood ServiceExtra Curr.Maint.Other

Funding Sources

• Local Sources: Taxes 62.2%

• State & Federal Sources 37.8%

• Grants

• Gifts

Funding Sources

% of Tax Value by Category

58

18

11

121

Oil/GasLandResidentialBusinessOther

Sunray Independent School District

Documents

Transcript of Sunray Independent School District