Strategic Metrics

Post on 28-Nov-2014

946 views 1 download

description

Strategic Metrics, presented at the Leadership Seminar on Strategy, Assessment and Service Development. University of Lund, Sweden. 19th September 2012. Presentation by Selena Killick, Cranfield University. Presentation discusses the need for assessment of Library Strategies and some of the techniques available to achieve this.

Transcript of Strategic Metrics

Selena Killick Library Quality Officer Leadership Seminar on Strategy, Assessment and Service Development. University of Lund 19th September 2012.

Strategic Metrics

Eras of Library Metrics

• Holdings

• Physical usage

• Customer satisfaction

• Electronic usage

• Value & Impact

Few libraries exist in a vacuum,

accountable only to themselves. There is

always a larger context for assessing

library quality, that is, what and how well

does the library contribute to achieving the

overall goals of the parent constituencies?

(S. Pritchard 1996)

Value & Impact Metrics

• Based on what matters the most to your key

stakeholders

• Identify where the Library impacts upon the goals of

the parent organisation

• Demonstrate how the library is contributing to the

mission of your institution

Strategic Metrics

• Start by defining your outcomes

• What do you want to demonstrate?

• What does your institution care about?

• SMART outcomes:

• Specific

• Measureable

• Attainable

• Relevant

• Time-bound

• If in doubt, KISS.

Good Strategic Metrics

• Linked to the University/Library mission & goals

• Provide useful information

• Reasonably accurate within the data limitations

• Ethical

• Cost effective

Mixed-Methods Approach

Quantitative

• Library Data

• Institutional Data

• National/International

Data

• Activity analysis

• Return on Investment

• Cost benefit

Qualitative

• Customer Surveys

• Focus groups

• Observational Studies

• Interviews

Quantitative Data

• Be prepared to take a fresh look at your data collection

• Look beyond the Library

• Talk to other data providers in your institution

• Combine data sets

• Local (Library & student data), national, international

• Check to see what is available before you start to count things

Case Study: Cornell University Library

Library Value Calculation

• Annual Cost to the institution $56,678,222

If CUL did not exist:

• Sourcing information and answering enquiries would

cost the institution $90,648,785

Source: Cornell University Library Research & Assessment Unit

Case Study: University of West Florida

UWF University Libraries calculated its Return on Investment (ROI) for eight of its services:

• students studying in the library;

• borrowing books, e-books, DVDs and laptops;

• students or faculty members asking reference questions or meeting with reference librarians for individual research consultations;

• conducting library instruction sessions; and,

• students or faculty members using subscription databases when off-campus.

Calculations based on the number of occurrences (service outputs) multiplied by an informal and conservative market value of the occurrence to calculate a summed value for the services. The summed value was then divided by sum of the University Libraries' personnel and operating expenditures.

• It was calculated that for every dollar expended by the University Libraries, at least $5.89 was returned for the services identified.

Source: University of West Florida

Case Study: University of Huddersfield

• Hypothesis: do the students who use the library the

most get the highest grades?

• Library Usage Data

• Book loans

• eResources usage

• Visits to the Library

• Student Attainment Data

• Final grade received when graduating

13

Non/Low Use Project Source: Stone, G. (2011)

Measuring Library Impact Source: Stone, G. (2011)

Analysis of the results consistently revealed a

correlation between e-resource use, book

borrowing and student attainment

This appears to be the case across all

disciplines

Thoughts

• Does correlation equal causation?

• Do our stakeholders like this impact data?

Qualitative Assessment

• Numbers are only ever half of the story

• Customer feedback can provide more insight that

data alone

• Customer quotes can have great impact on

stakeholders

When I started my distance learning

MSc it was the first time I had accessed

a digital library with such resources; you

have played a major positive role in my

effective learning.

The Library now has access

to 15,586 full text electronic

journals and 9,354 eBooks

Data Management

• Data Management is an important part of the

planning cycle

• Assessment management systems

• Qualitative coding software

• MS Excel / MS Access

Considerations

• Bring both the Qualitative and Quantitative together

• Collaborate with local experts

• Not all news will be good news

• Be realistic on what is achievable

How many staff-hours were spent

counting statistics this year?

Common Challenges

• Where do I start?!

• Finding the time

• Getting support from all Library staff

• Requesting data from other units

• Finding other data sets

• Difficulty in analysing and interpreting data

• Fear of change

• What if I fail?

Source: Megan Oakleaf, 2011,

Source: Megan Oakleaf, 2011,

Source: Megan Oakleaf, 2011,

Reporting Back

• Know your audience

• What do they care about?

• What is their level of understanding?

• Will they feel threatened by the data?

• Tell a story with the data

• Begin with the outcomes in mind

• Be mindful of the data limitations

References

• Institutional Return on Investment. University of West Florida.

http://libguides.uwf.edu/content.php?pid=188487&sid=2184200

• Library Scorecard: Strategic Objectives, Measures & Initiatives 2011/2012. McMaster

University Library, revised April 23, 2012, http://library.mcmaster.ca/library-scorecard

• Library Value Calculations. Cornell University Library Research & Assessment Unit.

http://research.library.cornell.edu/value

• Oakleaf, M. and Matthews, J. (2011). Assessing the Impact of the Academic Library.

Presented at the 9th Northumbria International Conference on Performance

Measurement in Libraries and Information Services. York, England. 22nd – 26th August.

• Stone, G. (2011). The Library Impact Data Project: hit, miss or maybe. Presented at the

9th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries

and Information Services. York, England. 22nd – 26th August.

Thank you!

Selena Killick s.a.killick@cranfield.ac.uk Twitter: @SelenaKillick Tel: +44(0)1793 785561