Strategic Metrics

28
Selena Killick Library Quality Officer Leadership Seminar on Strategy, Assessment and Service Development. University of Lund 19 th September 2012. Strategic Metrics

description

Strategic Metrics, presented at the Leadership Seminar on Strategy, Assessment and Service Development. University of Lund, Sweden. 19th September 2012. Presentation by Selena Killick, Cranfield University. Presentation discusses the need for assessment of Library Strategies and some of the techniques available to achieve this.

Transcript of Strategic Metrics

Page 1: Strategic Metrics

Selena Killick Library Quality Officer Leadership Seminar on Strategy, Assessment and Service Development. University of Lund 19th September 2012.

Strategic Metrics

Page 2: Strategic Metrics

Eras of Library Metrics

• Holdings

• Physical usage

• Customer satisfaction

• Electronic usage

• Value & Impact

Page 3: Strategic Metrics

Few libraries exist in a vacuum,

accountable only to themselves. There is

always a larger context for assessing

library quality, that is, what and how well

does the library contribute to achieving the

overall goals of the parent constituencies?

(S. Pritchard 1996)

Page 4: Strategic Metrics

Value & Impact Metrics

• Based on what matters the most to your key

stakeholders

• Identify where the Library impacts upon the goals of

the parent organisation

• Demonstrate how the library is contributing to the

mission of your institution

Page 5: Strategic Metrics

Strategic Metrics

• Start by defining your outcomes

• What do you want to demonstrate?

• What does your institution care about?

• SMART outcomes:

• Specific

• Measureable

• Attainable

• Relevant

• Time-bound

• If in doubt, KISS.

Page 6: Strategic Metrics

Good Strategic Metrics

• Linked to the University/Library mission & goals

• Provide useful information

• Reasonably accurate within the data limitations

• Ethical

• Cost effective

Page 7: Strategic Metrics

Mixed-Methods Approach

Quantitative

• Library Data

• Institutional Data

• National/International

Data

• Activity analysis

• Return on Investment

• Cost benefit

Qualitative

• Customer Surveys

• Focus groups

• Observational Studies

• Interviews

Page 8: Strategic Metrics

Quantitative Data

• Be prepared to take a fresh look at your data collection

• Look beyond the Library

• Talk to other data providers in your institution

• Combine data sets

• Local (Library & student data), national, international

• Check to see what is available before you start to count things

Page 9: Strategic Metrics

Case Study: Cornell University Library

Library Value Calculation

• Annual Cost to the institution $56,678,222

If CUL did not exist:

• Sourcing information and answering enquiries would

cost the institution $90,648,785

Source: Cornell University Library Research & Assessment Unit

Page 10: Strategic Metrics

Case Study: University of West Florida

UWF University Libraries calculated its Return on Investment (ROI) for eight of its services:

• students studying in the library;

• borrowing books, e-books, DVDs and laptops;

• students or faculty members asking reference questions or meeting with reference librarians for individual research consultations;

• conducting library instruction sessions; and,

• students or faculty members using subscription databases when off-campus.

Calculations based on the number of occurrences (service outputs) multiplied by an informal and conservative market value of the occurrence to calculate a summed value for the services. The summed value was then divided by sum of the University Libraries' personnel and operating expenditures.

• It was calculated that for every dollar expended by the University Libraries, at least $5.89 was returned for the services identified.

Source: University of West Florida

Page 11: Strategic Metrics

Case Study: University of Huddersfield

• Hypothesis: do the students who use the library the

most get the highest grades?

• Library Usage Data

• Book loans

• eResources usage

• Visits to the Library

• Student Attainment Data

• Final grade received when graduating

Page 12: Strategic Metrics

13

Non/Low Use Project Source: Stone, G. (2011)

Page 13: Strategic Metrics

Measuring Library Impact Source: Stone, G. (2011)

Analysis of the results consistently revealed a

correlation between e-resource use, book

borrowing and student attainment

This appears to be the case across all

disciplines

Page 14: Strategic Metrics

Thoughts

• Does correlation equal causation?

• Do our stakeholders like this impact data?

Page 15: Strategic Metrics

Qualitative Assessment

• Numbers are only ever half of the story

• Customer feedback can provide more insight that

data alone

• Customer quotes can have great impact on

stakeholders

Page 16: Strategic Metrics

When I started my distance learning

MSc it was the first time I had accessed

a digital library with such resources; you

have played a major positive role in my

effective learning.

The Library now has access

to 15,586 full text electronic

journals and 9,354 eBooks

Page 17: Strategic Metrics

Data Management

• Data Management is an important part of the

planning cycle

• Assessment management systems

• Qualitative coding software

• MS Excel / MS Access

Page 18: Strategic Metrics

Considerations

• Bring both the Qualitative and Quantitative together

• Collaborate with local experts

• Not all news will be good news

• Be realistic on what is achievable

How many staff-hours were spent

counting statistics this year?

Page 19: Strategic Metrics

Common Challenges

• Where do I start?!

• Finding the time

• Getting support from all Library staff

• Requesting data from other units

• Finding other data sets

• Difficulty in analysing and interpreting data

• Fear of change

• What if I fail?

Page 20: Strategic Metrics
Page 21: Strategic Metrics

Source: Megan Oakleaf, 2011,

Page 22: Strategic Metrics

Source: Megan Oakleaf, 2011,

Page 23: Strategic Metrics

Source: Megan Oakleaf, 2011,

Page 24: Strategic Metrics

Reporting Back

• Know your audience

• What do they care about?

• What is their level of understanding?

• Will they feel threatened by the data?

• Tell a story with the data

• Begin with the outcomes in mind

• Be mindful of the data limitations

Page 26: Strategic Metrics
Page 27: Strategic Metrics

References

• Institutional Return on Investment. University of West Florida.

http://libguides.uwf.edu/content.php?pid=188487&sid=2184200

• Library Scorecard: Strategic Objectives, Measures & Initiatives 2011/2012. McMaster

University Library, revised April 23, 2012, http://library.mcmaster.ca/library-scorecard

• Library Value Calculations. Cornell University Library Research & Assessment Unit.

http://research.library.cornell.edu/value

• Oakleaf, M. and Matthews, J. (2011). Assessing the Impact of the Academic Library.

Presented at the 9th Northumbria International Conference on Performance

Measurement in Libraries and Information Services. York, England. 22nd – 26th August.

• Stone, G. (2011). The Library Impact Data Project: hit, miss or maybe. Presented at the

9th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries

and Information Services. York, England. 22nd – 26th August.

Page 28: Strategic Metrics

Thank you!

Selena Killick [email protected] Twitter: @SelenaKillick Tel: +44(0)1793 785561