Biology Scoring Check ListStudent's Name : Class :Instrument : Title :

Element 1 Element 2 Element 3 Element 4 Element 5

Planning Skill Conducting skill Data Skill Interpreting & Scientific attitudes &

Conclusion skill Moral values

PI 1 (Investigation) PI 1 (Conducting) PI 1 (Data) PI 1 (Graph & PI 1

Objective Set up apparatus & Column and rows charts)

Problem statement material with titles and units Title

Hypothesis Technique Sufficient and Axes with units

Variables Obtaining data systematic data Uniform scale

Apparatus & 4 plotted points

Material PI 2 PI 2 (Diagram) smooth /curve/

Technique Using apparatus Quality correct shape

Procedure properly Label

Cleaning and keeping Neat or

(Activity without apparatus (diagram)

hypothesis and Disposing waste Score

variables) material 3 = PI 1 (2√) accurate

Objective and PI 2 (3√) labels

Problem statement Score with Data only neat and clear

Apparatus & 3 = PI 1 (3√) PI 1 (2√)

Material and PI 2 (3√) with diagram only PI 2

Technique 2 = PI 2 (3√) PI 2 (3√) correct relationship

Procedure and PI 2 (1 or 2√) between variables

Score 1 = PI 1 (3√) Score correct relationship

3=7 √ 5 [5] only 2 = PI 1 (1√) interpretation of

2 = 4-6 √ [3-4] and PI 2 (1-2√) data or obtain

1 = 1-3 √ [1-2] with data only accurate

PI 1 (1√) information from data

Folio, scrap book with diagram only

PI 1 PI 2(1-2√) PI 3

objective correct conclusion

Problem statement Score or restate

Apparatus & 1 = only idea of PI 1 hypothesis

Material and PI 2

Technique Score

Procedure Scrap Book & Folio 3 = PI 1 (5√)[3√]

PI 1 and PI 2 (2√)

Collect and present and PI 3 (1√)

Score PI 2

3 = 5 √ Record relevant Score

2 = 3-4 √ information 2 = PI 1 (3-4√)(2√)

1 = 1-2 √ PI 3 and any other 2 √

Record accurately

Score

Score 1 = any ONE of the

3 = 3 √ PI's completely or

2 = 2 √ any TWO PI's

1 = 1 √ not completely

SCORE

Signature :Name :Date :

Element 5

Scientific attitudes &

Moral values

PI 1

Honest and

accurate

Systematic, fair

and just

Responsible and

cooperative

PI 2

Interested

Curious

Persevering,

hardworking

PI 3

Critical,

analytical and

creative

Transparent and

open minded

Rational

PI 4

Values the

contribution of

science and

technology

Practice healthy

and clean living

and values the

balance of nature

Thankful for

God's blessing

Score

3 = Any One √

from ALL the a PI's

2 = Any One √ from

Any 3 PI's

1 = Any One √ from

Any 2 PI's

SCORE

INDIVIDUAL SCORE SHEET (Name PEKA BIOLOGYFormYearCentre No.

ELEMENTS

E1 E2 E3

Date Title PLANNING SKILL EXPERIMENTING DATA SKILL INTERPRETING &

SKILL CONCUSION SKILL

PP1 SCORE PP1 PP2 SCORE PP1 PP2 PP3 SCORE PP1

TOTAL OF 3 HIGHEST SCOREGRADE

SCORE GRADE SCORE GRADE SCORE GRADE SCORE

GRADING SCHEME 8.-9 A 8-9. A 8-9. A 8-9.5-7. B 5-7. B 5-7. B 5-7.3-4. C 3-4. C 3-4. C 3-4.1-2. D 1-2. D 1-2. D 1-2.

MASTER GRADE SHEET (SA)

School assessorSignaturePrincipalSchool Seal

E4 E5

INTERPRETING & SCIENTIFIC ATTITUDES & MORAL

CONCUSION SKILL VALUES

PP2 PP3 SCORE PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4 SCORE

SCORE GRADE SCORE GRADE

8-9. A 8-9. A5-7. B 5-7. B3-4. C 3-4. C1-2. D 1-2. D

E1 E2 E3PLANNING SKILL EXPERIMENTING DATA SKIL

SKILL

E4 E5INTERPRETING & SCIENTIFIC ATTITUDES & MORALCONCUSION SKILL VALUES

PEKA BIOLOGY

School

Form

Year

Center No.

Index E1 E2

No. Name IC No. No. PLANNING EXPERIMENTING

SKILL SKILL

PEKA BIOLOGY

School Assessor

Signature

Principal

School Seal

E3 E4 E5

DATA SKILL INTERPRETING SCIENTIFIC

& CONCUSION ATTITUDES &

SKILL MORAL VALUES

YEAR :

No/ SchoolAssesment Committee DocumentsOrganization Meeting Annual Circulars Manuals Letters of chart & calender appointment

Minutes

Total√ and *Total √Percentage √

IndIcators of administrative effectiveness Remarks (Implementation of Peka at school level80% - 100% Very effective60% - 79% Effective40% - 69% Moderately effective

SCORE STANDARDIZATION CHECKLIST (DA)

Special cases Standardiz- Candidates Transferred Others

appointment ation form from other candidatesschools

District :

NO SCHOOL SCORING PROCESSPercentage of Does thescores with teacherdeviation understand the

E1 E3 E4 scoring procedure? *

123456789

101112131415

Total

District Assesor :

Date :

* Enter Yes or No

SCORING PROCESSDoes the Is the teacher Remarks

teacher keep consistent into the scoring giving procedure ? * scores? *

SCHOOL :SUBJECT:FORM:SCHOOL ACESSOSOR :

No ELEMENT ELEMENT I Student Particulars 1 III

SA CSA/DA/ Δ SASTA

1 Name IC NoIndex No.

2 Name IC NoIndex No.

3 Name IC NoIndex No.

4 Name IC NoIndex No.

5 Name IC NoIndex No.Mean Deviation Δ

SA - School AssesorCSA - Chief School AssesorDA - District AssessorSTA - State AssesorΔ - Deviation √ if there is deviation and x if there is no deviation

SCHOOL CODE :SUBJECT CODE :

SCOREELEMENT ELEMENT

III IV REMARKS CSA/DA/ Δ SA CSA/DA/ Δ

STA STA

Name :

Signature :