Post on 13-Nov-2014
description
Eat Smart Move More, 2008
• More foods available everywhere
• More meals out (bigger portions)
• More sugar-sweetened beverages
•Less nutrient dense foods
•Less fruits and vegetables
• Successful food advertising
• More TV
• More car travel
• Fewer Physical Education classes
• Few safe walking/biking routes
• Lower perception of safety
Health
#5 In rates of Obesity
#8 In rates of Diabetes
#6 In rates of Hypertension
#6 In prevalence of Hypertension
#2 In deaths due to Stroke
Source: F is for Fat, Trust for America’s Health, 2009; National Center for Health Statistics, 2007, BRFSS, 2006
South Carolina Ranks:South Carolina Ranks:
Source: CDC Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.
1999
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1990, 1999, 2008
(* BMI 30, or about 30 lbs. overweight for 5’4” person)
2008
1990
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% 20%–24% 25%–29% ?30%
Oconee
Pickens
Anderson
Abbeville
GreenvilleSpartanburg
Cherokee
Laurens
Union
Edgefield
Greenwood
McCormick
Newberry
Saluda
Aiken
Chesterfield
FairfieldKershaw
Lancaster
Lexington
Chester
York
Darlington Dillon
Florence
Georgetown
Horry
Marion
Marlboro
Williamsburg
Beaufort
Berkeley
Charleston
Colleton
Dorchester
Hampton
Jasper
Allendale
BambergBarnwell
Orangeburg
Calhoun Clarendon
Lee
Richland Sumter
Percent of Overweight and Obese (BMI ≥ 25) in S.C. Adults
2000
50 – 54%
55 – 59%
60 – 64%
65 – 69%
70% +
< 50%
Source: DHEC, 2009
Oconee
Pickens
Anderson
Abbeville
GreenvilleSpartanburg
Cherokee
Laurens
Union
Edgefield
Greenwood
McCormick
Newberry
Saluda
Aiken
Chesterfield
FairfieldKershaw
Lancaster
Lexington
Chester
York
Darlington Dillon
Florence
Georgetown
Horry
Marion
Marlboro
Williamsburg
Beaufort
Berkeley
Charleston
Colleton
Dorchester
Hampton
Jasper
Allendale
BambergBarnwell
Orangeburg
Calhoun Clarendon
Lee
Richland Sumter
Percent of Overweight and Obese (BMI ≥ 25) in S.C. Adults
2001
50 – 54%
55 – 59%
60 – 64%
65 – 69%
70% +
< 50%
Source: DHEC, 2009
Oconee
Pickens
Anderson
Abbeville
GreenvilleSpartanburg
Cherokee
Laurens
Union
Edgefield
Greenwood
McCormick
Newberry
Saluda
Aiken
Chesterfield
FairfieldKershaw
Lancaster
Lexington
Chester
York
Darlington Dillon
Florence
Georgetown
Horry
Marion
Marlboro
Williamsburg
Beaufort
Berkeley
Charleston
Colleton
Dorchester
Hampton
Jasper
Allendale
BambergBarnwell
Orangeburg
Calhoun Clarendon
Lee
Richland Sumter
50 – 54%
55 – 59%
60 – 64%
65 – 69%
70% +
< 50%
Percent of Overweight and Obese (BMI ≥ 25) in S.C. Adults
2002
Source: DHEC, 2009
Oconee
Pickens
Anderson
Abbeville
GreenvilleSpartanburg
Cherokee
Laurens
Union
Edgefield
Greenwood
McCormick
Newberry
Saluda
Aiken
Chesterfield
FairfieldKershaw
Lancaster
Lexington
Chester
York
Darlington Dillon
Florence
Georgetown
Horry
Marion
Marlboro
Williamsburg
Beaufort
Berkeley
Charleston
Colleton
Dorchester
Hampton
Jasper
Allendale
BambergBarnwell
Orangeburg
Calhoun Clarendon
Lee
Richland Sumter
50 – 54%
55 – 59%
60 – 64%
65 – 69%
70% +
< 50%
Percent of Overweight and Obese (BMI ≥ 25) in S.C. Adults
2003
Source: DHEC, 2009
Oconee
Pickens
Anderson
Abbeville
GreenvilleSpartanburg
Cherokee
Laurens
Union
Edgefield
Greenwood
McCormick
Newberry
Saluda
Aiken
Chesterfield
FairfieldKershaw
Lancaster
Lexington
Chester
York
Darlington Dillon
Florence
Georgetown
Horry
Marion
Marlboro
Williamsburg
Beaufort
Berkeley
Charleston
Colleton
Dorchester
Hampton
Jasper
Allendale
BambergBarnwell
Orangeburg
Calhoun Clarendon
Lee
Richland Sumter
50 – 54%
55 – 59%
60 – 64%
65 – 69%
70% +
< 50%
Percent of Overweight and Obese (BMI ≥ 25) in S.C. Adults
2004
Source: DHEC, 2009
Oconee
Pickens
Anderson
Abbeville
GreenvilleSpartanburg
Cherokee
Laurens
Union
Edgefield
Greenwood
McCormick
Newberry
Saluda
Aiken
Chesterfield
FairfieldKershaw
Lancaster
Lexington
Chester
York
Darlington Dillon
Florence
Georgetown
Horry
Marion
Marlboro
Williamsburg
Beaufort
Berkeley
Charleston
Colleton
Dorchester
Hampton
Jasper
Allendale
BambergBarnwell
Orangeburg
Calhoun Clarendon
Lee
Richland Sumter
50 – 54%
55 – 59%
60 – 64%
65 – 69%
70% +
< 50%
Percent of Overweight and Obese (BMI ≥ 25) in S.C. Adults
2005
Source: DHEC, 2009
Oconee
Pickens
Anderson
Abbeville
GreenvilleSpartanburg
Cherokee
Laurens
Union
Edgefield
Greenwood
McCormick
Newberry
Saluda
Aiken
Chesterfield
FairfieldKershaw
Lancaster
Lexington
Chester
York
Darlington Dillon
Florence
Georgetown
Horry
Marion
Marlboro
Williamsburg
Beaufort
Berkeley
Charleston
Colleton
Dorchester
Hampton
Jasper
Allendale
BambergBarnwell
Orangeburg
Calhoun Clarendon
Lee
Richland Sumter
50 – 54%
55 – 59%
60 – 64%
65 – 69%
70% +
< 50%
Percent of Overweight and Obese (BMI ≥ 25) in S.C. Adults
2006
Source: DHEC, 2009
Oconee
Pickens
Anderson
Abbeville
GreenvilleSpartanburg
Cherokee
Laurens
Union
Edgefield
Greenwood
McCormick
Newberry
Saluda
Aiken
Chesterfield
FairfieldKershaw
Lancaster
Lexington
Chester
York
Darlington Dillon
Florence
Georgetown
Horry
Marion
Marlboro
Williamsburg
Beaufort
Berkeley
Charleston
Colleton
Dorchester
Hampton
Jasper
Allendale
BambergBarnwell
Orangeburg
Calhoun Clarendon
Lee
Richland Sumter
50 – 54%
55 – 59%
60 – 64%
65 – 69%
70% +
< 50%
Percent of Overweight and Obese (BMI ≥ 25) in S.C. Adults
2007
Source: DHEC, 2009
Oconee
Pickens
Anderson
Abbeville
GreenvilleSpartanburg
Cherokee
Laurens
Union
Edgefield
Greenwood
McCormick
Newberry
Saluda
Aiken
Chesterfield
FairfieldKershaw
Lancaster
Lexington
Chester
York
Darlington Dillon
Florence
Georgetown
Horry
Marion
Marlboro
Williamsburg
Beaufort
Berkeley
Charleston
Colleton
Dorchester
Hampton
Jasper
Allendale
BambergBarnwell
Orangeburg
Calhoun Clarendon
Lee
Richland Sumter
50 – 54%
55 – 59%
60 – 64%
65 – 69%
70% +
< 50%
Percent of Overweight and Obese (BMI ≥ 25) in S.C. Adults
2008
Source: DHEC, 2009
Over 28% of low-income children ages 2 - 5 are overweight or obese in S.C. Over 36% of children ages 10-17 are overweight or obese
SC ranks 13th in the percentage of obese and overweight children
Source: PedNSS, 2008, CAHMI/Data Resource Center of National Survey of Children’s Health, Trust for America’s Health
$1 billion in obesity related medical expenditures
Cost of Chronic Disease:$4.0 billion treatment$16.8 billion lost productivity
Economics of Obesity in SCEconomics of Obesity in SC
Eating Smart Moving More
Moving South Carolina Moving South Carolina Towards a Healthy Weight:Towards a Healthy Weight:
Promoting Healthy Lifestyles and Healthy Communities
Moving South Carolina Moving South Carolina Towards a Healthy Weight:Towards a Healthy Weight:
Promoting Healthy Lifestyles and Healthy Communities