Eat Smart Move More, 2008

• More foods available everywhere

• More meals out (bigger portions)

• More sugar-sweetened beverages

•Less nutrient dense foods

•Less fruits and vegetables

• Successful food advertising

• More TV

• More car travel

• Fewer Physical Education classes

• Few safe walking/biking routes

• Lower perception of safety

Health

#5 In rates of Obesity

#8 In rates of Diabetes

#6 In rates of Hypertension

#6 In prevalence of Hypertension

#2 In deaths due to Stroke

Source: F is for Fat, Trust for America’s Health, 2009; National Center for Health Statistics, 2007, BRFSS, 2006

South Carolina Ranks:South Carolina Ranks:

Source: CDC Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

1999

Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1990, 1999, 2008

(* BMI 30, or about 30 lbs. overweight for 5’4” person)

2008

1990

No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% 20%–24% 25%–29% ?30%

Oconee

Pickens

Anderson

Abbeville

GreenvilleSpartanburg

Cherokee

Laurens

Union

Edgefield

Greenwood

McCormick

Newberry

Saluda

Aiken

Chesterfield

FairfieldKershaw

Lancaster

Lexington

Chester

York

Darlington Dillon

Florence

Georgetown

Horry

Marion

Marlboro

Williamsburg

Beaufort

Berkeley

Charleston

Colleton

Dorchester

Hampton

Jasper

Allendale

BambergBarnwell

Orangeburg

Calhoun Clarendon

Lee

Richland Sumter

Percent of Overweight and Obese (BMI ≥ 25) in S.C. Adults

2000

50 – 54%

55 – 59%

60 – 64%

65 – 69%

70% +

< 50%

Source: DHEC, 2009

Oconee

Pickens

Anderson

Abbeville

GreenvilleSpartanburg

Cherokee

Laurens

Union

Edgefield

Greenwood

McCormick

Newberry

Saluda

Aiken

Chesterfield

FairfieldKershaw

Lancaster

Lexington

Chester

York

Darlington Dillon

Florence

Georgetown

Horry

Marion

Marlboro

Williamsburg

Beaufort

Berkeley

Charleston

Colleton

Dorchester

Hampton

Jasper

Allendale

BambergBarnwell

Orangeburg

Calhoun Clarendon

Lee

Richland Sumter

Percent of Overweight and Obese (BMI ≥ 25) in S.C. Adults

2001

50 – 54%

55 – 59%

60 – 64%

65 – 69%

70% +

< 50%

Source: DHEC, 2009

Oconee

Pickens

Anderson

Abbeville

GreenvilleSpartanburg

Cherokee

Laurens

Union

Edgefield

Greenwood

McCormick

Newberry

Saluda

Aiken

Chesterfield

FairfieldKershaw

Lancaster

Lexington

Chester

York

Darlington Dillon

Florence

Georgetown

Horry

Marion

Marlboro

Williamsburg

Beaufort

Berkeley

Charleston

Colleton

Dorchester

Hampton

Jasper

Allendale

BambergBarnwell

Orangeburg

Calhoun Clarendon

Lee

Richland Sumter

50 – 54%

55 – 59%

60 – 64%

65 – 69%

70% +

< 50%

Percent of Overweight and Obese (BMI ≥ 25) in S.C. Adults

2002

Source: DHEC, 2009

Oconee

Pickens

Anderson

Abbeville

GreenvilleSpartanburg

Cherokee

Laurens

Union

Edgefield

Greenwood

McCormick

Newberry

Saluda

Aiken

Chesterfield

FairfieldKershaw

Lancaster

Lexington

Chester

York

Darlington Dillon

Florence

Georgetown

Horry

Marion

Marlboro

Williamsburg

Beaufort

Berkeley

Charleston

Colleton

Dorchester

Hampton

Jasper

Allendale

BambergBarnwell

Orangeburg

Calhoun Clarendon

Lee

Richland Sumter

50 – 54%

55 – 59%

60 – 64%

65 – 69%

70% +

< 50%

Percent of Overweight and Obese (BMI ≥ 25) in S.C. Adults

2003

Source: DHEC, 2009

Oconee

Pickens

Anderson

Abbeville

GreenvilleSpartanburg

Cherokee

Laurens

Union

Edgefield

Greenwood

McCormick

Newberry

Saluda

Aiken

Chesterfield

FairfieldKershaw

Lancaster

Lexington

Chester

York

Darlington Dillon

Florence

Georgetown

Horry

Marion

Marlboro

Williamsburg

Beaufort

Berkeley

Charleston

Colleton

Dorchester

Hampton

Jasper

Allendale

BambergBarnwell

Orangeburg

Calhoun Clarendon

Lee

Richland Sumter

50 – 54%

55 – 59%

60 – 64%

65 – 69%

70% +

< 50%

Percent of Overweight and Obese (BMI ≥ 25) in S.C. Adults

2004

Source: DHEC, 2009

Oconee

Pickens

Anderson

Abbeville

GreenvilleSpartanburg

Cherokee

Laurens

Union

Edgefield

Greenwood

McCormick

Newberry

Saluda

Aiken

Chesterfield

FairfieldKershaw

Lancaster

Lexington

Chester

York

Darlington Dillon

Florence

Georgetown

Horry

Marion

Marlboro

Williamsburg

Beaufort

Berkeley

Charleston

Colleton

Dorchester

Hampton

Jasper

Allendale

BambergBarnwell

Orangeburg

Calhoun Clarendon

Lee

Richland Sumter

50 – 54%

55 – 59%

60 – 64%

65 – 69%

70% +

< 50%

Percent of Overweight and Obese (BMI ≥ 25) in S.C. Adults

2005

Source: DHEC, 2009

Oconee

Pickens

Anderson

Abbeville

GreenvilleSpartanburg

Cherokee

Laurens

Union

Edgefield

Greenwood

McCormick

Newberry

Saluda

Aiken

Chesterfield

FairfieldKershaw

Lancaster

Lexington

Chester

York

Darlington Dillon

Florence

Georgetown

Horry

Marion

Marlboro

Williamsburg

Beaufort

Berkeley

Charleston

Colleton

Dorchester

Hampton

Jasper

Allendale

BambergBarnwell

Orangeburg

Calhoun Clarendon

Lee

Richland Sumter

50 – 54%

55 – 59%

60 – 64%

65 – 69%

70% +

< 50%

Percent of Overweight and Obese (BMI ≥ 25) in S.C. Adults

2006

Source: DHEC, 2009

Oconee

Pickens

Anderson

Abbeville

GreenvilleSpartanburg

Cherokee

Laurens

Union

Edgefield

Greenwood

McCormick

Newberry

Saluda

Aiken

Chesterfield

FairfieldKershaw

Lancaster

Lexington

Chester

York

Darlington Dillon

Florence

Georgetown

Horry

Marion

Marlboro

Williamsburg

Beaufort

Berkeley

Charleston

Colleton

Dorchester

Hampton

Jasper

Allendale

BambergBarnwell

Orangeburg

Calhoun Clarendon

Lee

Richland Sumter

50 – 54%

55 – 59%

60 – 64%

65 – 69%

70% +

< 50%

Percent of Overweight and Obese (BMI ≥ 25) in S.C. Adults

2007

Source: DHEC, 2009

Oconee

Pickens

Anderson

Abbeville

GreenvilleSpartanburg

Cherokee

Laurens

Union

Edgefield

Greenwood

McCormick

Newberry

Saluda

Aiken

Chesterfield

FairfieldKershaw

Lancaster

Lexington

Chester

York

Darlington Dillon

Florence

Georgetown

Horry

Marion

Marlboro

Williamsburg

Beaufort

Berkeley

Charleston

Colleton

Dorchester

Hampton

Jasper

Allendale

BambergBarnwell

Orangeburg

Calhoun Clarendon

Lee

Richland Sumter

50 – 54%

55 – 59%

60 – 64%

65 – 69%

70% +

< 50%

Percent of Overweight and Obese (BMI ≥ 25) in S.C. Adults

2008

Source: DHEC, 2009

Over 28% of low-income children ages 2 - 5 are overweight or obese in S.C. Over 36% of children ages 10-17 are overweight or obese

SC ranks 13th in the percentage of obese and overweight children

Source: PedNSS, 2008, CAHMI/Data Resource Center of National Survey of Children’s Health, Trust for America’s Health

$1 billion in obesity related medical expenditures

Cost of Chronic Disease:$4.0 billion treatment$16.8 billion lost productivity

Economics of Obesity in SCEconomics of Obesity in SC

Eating Smart Moving More

Moving South Carolina Moving South Carolina Towards a Healthy Weight:Towards a Healthy Weight:

Promoting Healthy Lifestyles and Healthy Communities

Moving South Carolina Moving South Carolina Towards a Healthy Weight:Towards a Healthy Weight:

Promoting Healthy Lifestyles and Healthy Communities