Post on 06-Oct-2020
F o r e s t a n d r a n g e e v a l u a t i o n p r o g r a mSustainability of Forest and Range Resources through Science and Stewardship
TechnicalGuidanceTechnicalGuidance
1
Guide to Past Projects, Current Initiatives, and Future Vision for FREP Spatial DataPrepared by Natalie Cushing, FREP GIS Co-op
The Forest and Range Evaluation Program (FREP) recognizes the importance of using a variety of tools, including maps, to communicate the program’s achievements. This newsletter summarizes work undertaken to improve the quality and availability of spatial data describing FREP sample locations as well as the long term vision for integrating FREP Information Management System (IMS) with corporate spatial data tools.
0 100 200 30050Kilometers
LegendFREP Sample Sites
Forest Districts
British Columbia
Data Sources and NotesBase Mapping from the LRDWFREP Data from FREP IMS
Projection BC Albers, NAD 83
Produced by Natalie CushingFor Ministry of Forests and RangeMarch 2009
Figure 1. Forest and Range Evaluation Program sample sites for the years 2005 to 2007 for stand level biodiversity, riparian, visual quality, and water quality monitoring
Contents
Summary of Winter 2009 Projects ....... 2
Survey Results ..... 2
SharePoint Up and Running ....... 3
PDF Maps Reviewed .......... 3
Focus on the 2009 Field Season ...... 4
Creating Maps with Orthophots and UTM Grid ...... 4
Recording Accurate UTM Coordinates in the Field .......... 4
Validating Spatial Data .......... 5
Vision for Spatial Data in FREP ........... 5
Automated Spatial Validation ................. 5
Custom Views in MapView ..................... 6
Land and Resource Data Warehouse ...................... 6
Acknowledgements ............... 6
#4May 2009
Summary of Winter 2009 Projects
In keeping with FREP’s commitment to continuous improvement, work is underway to improve the quality and accessibility of spatial data in our program. The first step in this process has been to establish communication among stakeholders and to assess requirements. This section summarizes three projects from winter 2008/09 that highlight that work.
survey resultsFollowing are the results of a survey conducted to gather district feedback on current Geographic Information Systems (GIS) use and mapping needs. More detailed results can be found on the FREP GIS Resource Centre SharePoint site.
Based on the responses to the survey, the major uses of mapping by FREP staff are district level pre-season planning, opening level planning, and internal communications. However, as indicated in Figure 2, improved access to spatial data would also fulfill an identified desire to incorporate mapping into post-season data analysis and external communications.
At present time, the data for this mapping work is accessed primarily from the LRDW and local drives. While the majority of respondents had a GIS technician in their office, half of these technicians do not work on FREP projects at this time.
The most popular formats for distributing spatial data were identified as PDF maps and shapefiles. Respondents showed a preference for 11x17 and poster sized maps at the district and opening scale. MapView was the most popular option for accessing FREP spatial data, followed by FREP IMS.
The key finding of the survey was that there are two distinct groups of GIS users in FREP. The first has basic knowledge of Global Positioning System (GPS) and GIS. This group tends to access spatial data through MapView and prefers to receive maps as PDF documents. This group’s top requests were more communications, maps and access to FREP data through MapView.
0
25
50
75
100
District wide pre-season planning
Opening levelfield workplanning
Post-season dataanalysis
Internalcommunication
Externalcommunication
Perc
ent o
f Res
pond
ents
Current Uses of Mapping Desired Uses of FREP Data
Figure 2. 2009 Survey Results Showing Current Uses of Mapping in FREP. Compared with Desired Uses of FREP Data
2
33
The second group of GIS users in FREP has a significant level of training in GIS through post-secondary education or employment. These users tend to access data through the Land and Resource Data Warehouse (LRDW) and local drives, and works primarily in the GIS Terminal Server (GTS) environment. This group wants to access FREP data in shapefiles, and requested advanced GIS tools like random point generators and map templates.
Ongoing data distribution and communication projects will incorporate the needs of both identified user groups.
SharePoint Up and Running
The creation of a new SharePoint site for FREP GIS users was a cornerstone of this winter’s work. The site is called the FREP GIS Resource Centre and can be accessed through the main FREP SharePoint site or
the MFR SharePoint Site Index.
Currently this site is being used by Branch to post GIS related announcements and
to distribute documents and data. This will continue to be the main resource for
accessing FREP maps and GIS manuals created or distributed by Branch. This site is will also be used to share spatial data with FREP staff who do not have GTS access.
The FREP GIS Resource Centre is also designed to facilitate sharing of GIS information, documentation, and data developed by district staff. A key reason for creating the SharePoint was to draw on and promote the knowledge that already exists in district offices. The discussion boards in particular can be a great tool for networking, learning about ArcMap and MapView functionality, and building a reference of questions and answers.
accessing Frep dataFREP spatial data is available from two sources: the FREP GIS Resource Centre SharePoint site and the Marble drive (which should be considered the main source of FREP spatial data). To access data through the Marble drive (usually mapped as W:\\marble\work), go to W:\FOR\VIC\HFP\Library\FREP Data . This FREP Data library will hold all geodatabases and maps developed for the districts. As additional tools such as map templates and models are developed, they will also be included in the FREP Data Library.
It is recognized that those who do not have GIS Terminal Server (GTS) access are likely unfamiliar with the Marble drive. However, everyone can upload shapefiles into MapView. For these users, basic FREP shapefiles are available on the FREP GIS Resource Centre SharePoint in zipped folders. To view the shapefiles, download and extract the folders to a local drive, launch MapView, open the Upload Shapefile tool, and browse to each of the three files requested in the dialogue window (.dbh, .shp, .shx). See the MapView Manual for more information on uploading shapefiles.
4
PDF Maps Reviewed
Draft district scale maps showing FREP sample points to date were created from UTM coordinates entered in FREP IMS. Figure 3 shows one example of the maps created. PDF copies of the maps were made available on the FREP GIS Resource Centre SharePoint and district staff were invited to review the accuracy of the mapped sample points and the overall look of the maps.
In the four weeks allowed for feedback, 26 districts responded. Most of the suggestions were implemented – the maps are certainly more accurate and better looking as a result! Perhaps the most significant result of the review process was the recognition of the need for separate maps for validation and communication. A validation map template has since been designed and implemented.
Final versions of the maps will be available on the SharePoint site this spring. These are basic maps showing where FREP has been and are intended for use as communication tools. Those wishing to use FREP spatial data for more detailed mapping or analysis can access the data through the W:/Work on Marble drive. Contact your GIS technician or Branch for more information.
Alexis Creek
Forest and Range Evaluation ProgramRiparian Function Status 2005-2007
Chilcotin Forest District
Key Map
Legend
Data Sources and NotesBasemap: Digital Baseline Mapping, 1:200,000Hillshade: 50m Handpainted ReliefDistrict: FADM District, RTEB, MFRParks: BC Protected Areas Strategy, MSRM and National Parks, Digital Baseline Mapping, 1:7,500,000Projection: BC Albers, NAD 83
0 10 205
Kilometers
CityRoadFerryWaterbodyParkDistrict
Produced by FREP Stafffor Ministry of Forests and Range
Updated: Nov. 2008By: K. Leatherbarrow
Properly functioning
Properly functioning, at risk
Properly functioning at high risk
Not properly functioning
Riparian Function Status
Figure 3. An Example of a Draft Map
Distributed to Districts for Review
4
4 5
Focus on the 2009 Field Season
Short term goals for FREP’s spatial data focus on providing district staff with additional resources to collect and input the highest possible quality spatial data.
The emphasis for the 2009 field season is on the following three initiatives:
Creating opening maps with orthopohotos and utm gridThe FREP GIS Assessment
survey showed that opening level planning and field work
is a major use of GIS mapping in FREP. High quality opening level
maps aid all aspects of field work, but are particularly important for collecting and validating coordinates. Two techniques offer increased ability to validate coordinates in the field and are already in use by several districts (see figure 4):1. Drawing opening boundaries over
digital orthophotos: Both MapView and ArcMap can be used to create maps with orthophotos.
2. Drawing UTM grids over digital orthophotos: Gridlines at the appropriate scale can only be added in ArcMap. Gridlines can be labelled with UTM coordinates for use in selecting random points, locating random points in the field, and accurately recording coordinates on field cards.
See the GIS/GPS Procedures Manual on the FREP GIS Resource Centre for more information on grid lines and orthophotos. Please see the text box on this page for more information on accessing orthophotos.
Figure 4. Map with
Orthophoto and
UTM Grid
4865
50
486550
4866
00
486600
4866
50
486650
4867
00
486700
4867
50
486750
4868
00
486800
4868
50
486850
4869
00
486900
4869
50
486950
4870
00
487000
4870
50
487050
4871
00
487100
4871
50
487150
4872
00
487200
4872
50
487250
4873
00
487300
4873
50
487350
4874
00
487400
5734250 5734250
5734300 5734300
5734350 5734350
5734400 5734400
5734450 5734450
5734500 5734500
5734550 5734550
5734600 5734600
5734650 5734650
5734700 5734700
5734750 5734750
5734800 5734800
5734850 5734850
5734900 5734900
5734950 5734950
5735000 5735000
5735050 5735050
5735100 5735100
5735150 5735150
5735200 5735200
5735250 5735250
5735300 5735300
5735350 5735350
5735400 5735400
Opening Number:100197Photo Year: 2005
Harvest Complete Date:2004
1:5,000
Figure 4. Map with Orthophoto and UTM Grid
Finding orthophotosDigital orthophotos are available through both MapView and ArcMap. In MapView, an orthophoto mosaic can be found in the Grids and Imagery folder in the Layers tab. This coverage is patchy for the coast and the northwest corner of the province.
Orthophotos can also be accessed from ArcMap through either the British Columbia Imagery WMS,
or through the O: drive. To access orthophotos through either method, use the Add Data tool. For the British Columbia Imagery WMS, look in Catalogue > GIS Servers > British Columbia Imagery WMS on openmaps. When looking in the O drive, navigate to O://airborn/ortho_tiles. This folder is arranged by year, UTM zone, and mapsheet.
6
recording accurate utm Coordinates in the FieldWhile post-season validation of spatial data will always be important, it is most efficient to collect accurate coordinates and enter them correctly into FREP IMS. Therefore, FREP field staff are the first and most important part of creating accurate spatial data.
To create high quality spatial data, keep these points in mind this field season:• MostFREPsamplepointsarecollectedinUTM
• VisualqualitysamplepointsarecollectedinLatitudeandLongitude
• UTMcoordinatesincludeazone,asixdigiteastingandasevendigitnorthing
• Latitudeandlongitudeshouldbeindegrees:minutes:secondswithsecondsgiventothenearesthundredth,also known as decimal seconds
A reference sheet for spatial data which expands on these points has been created and is available on the FREP GIS Resource Centre SharePoint.
Bear in mind that the accuracy of the coordinates collected by your geographic positioning system (GPS) will depend on the quality of the satellite coverage. An opening map with a UTM grid can be used as a reference to validate GPS coordinates in the field when satellite coverage is poor.
validating spatial data
For the 2009 field season, increased responsibility for FREP data validation will be turned over to the districts. This presents an opportunity for district field staff to check the accuracy of the spatial data before it is entered into FREP IMS.
To validate sample coordinates, MapView should be used to verify accuracy against opening boundaries or other landmarks. In MapView, open the ‘Silviculture’ view during validation. Use the ‘Navigation’ tab to validate each set of coordinates by using ‘Zoom to UTM Coordinate’ or ‘Zoom to Geographic.’ It is recommended that a scale of 1:10,000 be used for validation. If the point is incorrect, use additional layers, orthophotos, and field notes to find the correct coordinates.
Figure 5. A draft validation map to aid districts in confirming the locations of their sample points
093I.111
093I.110
093I.115093I.114093I.113093I.112
093I.119093I.118093I.117093I.116
093I.105093I.104093I.103093I.102093I.101
093I.109093I.108093I.107093I.106
093I.120
093I.125093I.124093I.123093I.122093I.121
093J.111
093J.110
093A.119093A.118093A.117093A.116093B.116 093B.117 093B.119093B.118
093J.115093J.114093J.112 093J.113
093J.116 093J.119093J.117 093J.118
093J.105093J.101 093J.104093J.102 093J.103
093H.111
093A.120
093J.106 093J.109093J.107 093J.108
093B.120
093P.111
093A.125093A.124093A.123093A.122093A.121093B.125093B.121 093B.122 093B.124093B.123
093H.110
093J.120
093G.111093H.115093H.114093H.113093H.112
093J.121 093J.125093J.122 093J.124093J.123
093P.110
093H.119093H.118093H.117093H.116
093P.115
093H.105
093P.114
093H.104
093P.113
093H.103
093P.112
093H.102093H.101
093G.110093H.109093H.108
093P.119
093H.107093H.106
093P.118093P.117093P.116
093G.115093G.112 093G.114093G.113
093P.105093P.104093P.103093P.102093P.101
093G.116 093G.117 093G.119093G.118
093P.109093P.108093P.107093P.106
093G.105093G.101 093G.102 093G.104093G.103
093H.120
093G.106 093G.107 093G.109093G.108
093H.125093H.124093H.123093H.122093H.121
093P.120
093G.120
093G.121 093G.125093G.124093G.122 093G.123
093O.111
093O.110
093O.115093O.112 093O.114093O.113
093O.116 093O.117 093O.119093O.118
093O.101 093O.105093O.102 093O.104093O.103
093O.106 093O.109093O.107 093O.108
093O.120
093A.115093A.114093A.113093A.112093A.111093B.111 093B.115093B.112 093B.114093B.113
093O.123093O.122 093O.124 093O.125093O.121 093P.121
093N.120
093N.115
093N.110
093N.105
093K.125
093K.120
093K.115
093K.110
093F.125
093K.105
093F.120
093F.115
093F.110
093F.105
093P.122 093P.123
083E.121
093P.124093N.125 093P.125
083D.111
Wells
Quesnel
Chetwynd
Mackenzie
Vanderhoof
Pouce Coupe
Tumbler Ridge
Prince George
Key Map
Legend
Potential Sample Location ErrorsCitiesRoadRailwayFerryRivers
MOFR Mapsheet Grid DistrictsParksLakes
0 20 4010
Kilometers
Forest and Range Evaluation ProgramPotential Errors in 2007 Visual Quality Sample Locations
Prince George Forest District
Data Sources and NotesBasemap: Digital Baseline Mapping, 1:200,000Hillshade: 50m Handpainted ReliefDistrict: FADM District, RTEB, MFRParks: BC Protected Areas Strategy, MSRMand National Parks, Digital Baseline Mapping, 1:7,500,000Projection: BC Albers, NAD 83
Produced by FREP Stafffor Ministry of Forests and Range
Updated: March 2009By: N. Cushing
7
Vision For Spatial Data In FREP
The work done this winter has gone a long way to standardize and distribute FREP spatial data, build communication among GIS users, and provide mapping and communication tools to districts. However, we can go much further to integrate and communicate FREP spatial data in the future. Here are the three major goals and ongoing projects for FREP spatial data from a Branch perspective.
automated spatial validation
Plans have been made to include basic automated validation of spatial data in a future release of FREP IMS. These updates will eliminate many commonly noted sources of error but will not replace validation by district staff. As time and funding allow, the following updates are proposed:• AutomaticallylaunchMapViewtothe
coordinates entered
• RestrictUTMeastingandnorthingvaluesto the correct number of digits
• RestrictzoneandUTMcoordinatestothe possible range for the district indicated
Ideally, coordinates could be checked against data in spatial databases linked to FREP IMS. Figure 6
shows two layers that could be used for basic spatial validation: UTM zones and district boundaries.
Custom views in mapview
In 2007, requirements were gathered for a FREP view in MapView. This view would include default layers and a menu of optional layers. The layer symbology would be designed to aid FREP staff in selecting openings from the district random list and conducting pre-field season mapping. The FREP IMS Users Working Group is still interested in pursuing this project, but must balance it with other priorities and budget constraints. On a positive note, any delays in this work will allow resource values added to FREP IMS since the initial requirements gathering to be incorporated into the final product.
share Your gis expertise on the Frep gis resource Centre sharepoint site
The work presented here is summary of work done this winter in Branch. However, we also want to acknowledge all the innovative GIS work that is ongoing in regional and district offices.
If you have a tip, technique, or great data source, please post it on the FREP GIS Resource Centre SharePoint for all to see. Likewise, if you have a question, post it on the SharePoint discussion boards to see if your fellow GIS users can help you out. We are particularly interested to hear about models and scripts that are being used. The FREP GIS Resource Centre SharePoint site is there for you to share your knowledge and learn from others.
8
land and resource data Warehouse
Even before the survey results were in, it was clear from informal communications with branch and district staff that there is a desire to access FREP data through the Land and
Data Resource Warehouse (LRDW) and to view FREP data in MapView. Submission of FREP data to the LRDW is the long term goal for the program and initial work is underway to
achieve this goal.
It is important to note
that the requirements for creating a spatial database from FREP IMS and linking it to the LRDW are complex. The level of priority for this added functionality will be balanced with other requests by the FREP IMS Working Group and project managers. Interim means of distributing data are being implemented: all FREP staff will be able to access shapefiles through the FREP GIS Resource Centre SharePoint site. GTS users are encouraged to access data through the W:\work on marble drive at FOR>VIC>HFP>Library>FREP Data.
Acknowledgements
The work done to improve the quality and integration of FREP’s spatial data has been a team effort. Many people have given their time, energy, and expertise to these projects. In particular the following peoples’ work is gratefully acknowledged: Alanya Smith, Andrew Riecker, Attila Gereb, Diane Millar, Frank Barber, Gilbert Richir, Joel Graboski, Kate Leatherbarrow, Leslie McAuley, Matt Leroy, Peter Bradford, Steve Baumber, Susan Elo, and Thomas Chen.
DSS DFN
DPCDMK
DPG
DNI
DQCDNC
DKM
DJA
DND
DCH
DSI
DRM
DHW
DOSDCS
DSS
DCODCC
DAB
DQU
DSCDCRDCK
DVA
DKADKL
DMH
DSQ
Zone 8 Zone 9 Zone 10 Zone 11
0 300150
Kilometers
Figure 6. Two spatial layers against which FREP sample points could be checked: UTM zone and district boundaries.