Post on 29-Jan-2016
description
Getting Water for Environmental Flow
7 mistakes, and the Way Forward
Chetan Pandit
Getting Water for Environmental Flow
7 mistakes, and the Way Forward
Chetan Pandit
Accept
1. Research will not yield EF quantification
Accept
1. Research will not yield EF quantification
Accept
1. Research will not yield EF quantification
2. Quantum of EF can not be decided by environmental scientists, ‘a-priory’. Requires trade-off decisions with other uses.
Accept
1. Research will not yield EF quantification
2. Quantum of EF can not be decided by environmental scientists, ‘a-priory’. Requires trade-off decisions with other uses.
Accept
1. Research will not yield EF quantification
2. Quantum of EF can not be decided by environmental scientists, ‘a-priory’. Requires trade-off decisions with other uses.
3. Water for EF will have to be negotiated with other users, on a equal basis.
Accept
1. Research will not yield EF quantification
2. Quantum of EF can not be decided by environmental scientists, ‘a-priory’. Requires trade-off decisions with other uses.
3. Water for EF will have to be negotiated with other users, on a equal basis.
Accept
1. Research will not yield EF quantification
2. Quantum of EF can not be decided by environmental scientists, ‘a-priory’. Requires trade-off decisions with other uses.
3. Water for EF will have to be negotiated with other users, on a equal basis.
4. Water for EF as volume, NOT as flow rate in a reach
Accept
1. Research will not yield EF quantification
2. Quantum of EF can not be decided by environmental scientists, ‘a-priory’. Requires trade-off decisions with other uses.
3. Water for EF will have to be negotiated with other users, on a equal basis.
4. Water for EF as volume, NOT as flow rate in a reach
Accept
1. Research will not yield EF quantification
2. Quantum of EF can not be decided by environmental scientists, ‘a-priory’. Requires trade-off decisions with other uses.
3. Water for EF will have to be negotiated with other users, on a equal basis.
4. Water for EF as volume, NOT as flow rate in a reach
5. Env. as an independent claimant for water, at par with the States. (NOT a “use” within State’s share)
Accept
1. Research will not yield EF quantification
2. Quantum of EF can not be decided by environmental scientists, ‘a-priory’. Requires trade-off decisions with other uses.
3. Water for EF will have to be negotiated with other users, on a equal basis.
4. Water for EF as volume, NOT as flow rate in a reach
5. Env. as an independent claimant for water, at par with the States. (NOT a “use” within State’s share)
Accept
1. Research will not yield EF quantification
2. Quantum of EF can not be decided by environmental scientists, ‘a-priory’. Requires trade-off decisions with other uses.
3. Water for EF will have to be negotiated with other users, on a equal basis.
4. Water for EF as volume, NOT as flow rate in a reach
5. Env. as an independent claimant for water, at par with the States. (NOT a “use” within State’s share)
6. Water for EF can not be obtained through pompous rhetoric. Will have to argue for a share, before Tribunals.
Accept
1. Research will not yield EF quantification
2. Quantum of EF can not be decided by environmental scientists, ‘a-priory’. Requires trade-off decisions with other uses.
3. Water for EF will have to be negotiated with other users, on a equal basis.
4. Water for EF as volume, NOT as flow rate in a reach
5. Env. as an independent claimant for water, at par with the States. (NOT a “use” within State’s share)
6. Water for EF can not be obtained through pompous rhetoric. Will have to argue for a share, before Tribunals.
Accept
1. Research will not yield EF quantification
2. Quantum of EF can not be decided by environmental scientists, ‘a-priory’. Requires trade-off decisions with other uses.
3. Water for EF will have to be negotiated with other users, on a equal basis.
4. Water for EF as volume, NOT as flow rate in a reach
5. Env. as an independent claimant for water, at par with the States. (NOT a “use” within State’s share)
6. Water for EF can not be obtained through pompous rhetoric. Will have to argue for a share, before Tribunals.
7. Large Storages necessary to supply EF in lean season
Accept
1. Research will not yield EF quantification
2. Quantum of EF can not be decided by environmental scientists, ‘a-priory’. Requires trade-off decisions with other uses.
3. Water for EF will have to be negotiated with other users, on a equal basis.
4. Water for EF as volume, NOT as flow rate in a reach
5. Env. as an independent claimant for water, at par with the States. (NOT a “use” within State’s share)
6. Water for EF can not be obtained through pompous rhetoric. Will have to argue for a share, before Tribunals.
7. Large Storages necessary to supply EF in lean season
Accept
1. Research will not yield EF quantification
2. Quantum of EF can not be decided by environmental scientists, ‘a-priory’. Requires trade-off decisions with other uses.
3. Water for EF will have to be negotiated with other users, on a equal basis.
4. Water for EF as volume, NOT as flow rate in a reach
5. Env. as an independent claimant for water, at par with the States. (NOT a “use” within State’s share)
6. Water for EF can not be obtained through pompous rhetoric. Will have to argue for a share, before Tribunals.
7. Large Storages necessary to supply EF in lean season
Accept
1. Research will not yield EF quantification
2. Quantum of EF can not be decided by environmental scientists, ‘a-priory’. Requires trade-off decisions with other uses.
3. Water for EF will have to be negotiated with other users, on a equal basis.
4. Water for EF as volume, NOT as flow rate in a reach
5. Env. as an independent claimant for water, at par with the States. (NOT a “use” within State’s share)
6. Water for EF can not be obtained through pompous rhetoric. Will have to argue for a share, before Tribunals.
7. Large Storages necessary to supply EF in lean season
ThanksThanks