Getting Water for Environmental Flow

7 mistakes, and the Way Forward

Chetan Pandit

Getting Water for Environmental Flow

7 mistakes, and the Way Forward

Chetan Pandit

Accept

1. Research will not yield EF quantification

Accept

1. Research will not yield EF quantification

Accept

1. Research will not yield EF quantification

2. Quantum of EF can not be decided by environmental scientists, ‘a-priory’. Requires trade-off decisions with other uses.

Accept

1. Research will not yield EF quantification

2. Quantum of EF can not be decided by environmental scientists, ‘a-priory’. Requires trade-off decisions with other uses.

Accept

1. Research will not yield EF quantification

2. Quantum of EF can not be decided by environmental scientists, ‘a-priory’. Requires trade-off decisions with other uses.

3. Water for EF will have to be negotiated with other users, on a equal basis.

Accept

1. Research will not yield EF quantification

2. Quantum of EF can not be decided by environmental scientists, ‘a-priory’. Requires trade-off decisions with other uses.

3. Water for EF will have to be negotiated with other users, on a equal basis.

Accept

1. Research will not yield EF quantification

2. Quantum of EF can not be decided by environmental scientists, ‘a-priory’. Requires trade-off decisions with other uses.

3. Water for EF will have to be negotiated with other users, on a equal basis.

4. Water for EF as volume, NOT as flow rate in a reach

Accept

1. Research will not yield EF quantification

2. Quantum of EF can not be decided by environmental scientists, ‘a-priory’. Requires trade-off decisions with other uses.

3. Water for EF will have to be negotiated with other users, on a equal basis.

4. Water for EF as volume, NOT as flow rate in a reach

Accept

1. Research will not yield EF quantification

2. Quantum of EF can not be decided by environmental scientists, ‘a-priory’. Requires trade-off decisions with other uses.

3. Water for EF will have to be negotiated with other users, on a equal basis.

4. Water for EF as volume, NOT as flow rate in a reach

5. Env. as an independent claimant for water, at par with the States. (NOT a “use” within State’s share)

Accept

1. Research will not yield EF quantification

2. Quantum of EF can not be decided by environmental scientists, ‘a-priory’. Requires trade-off decisions with other uses.

3. Water for EF will have to be negotiated with other users, on a equal basis.

4. Water for EF as volume, NOT as flow rate in a reach

5. Env. as an independent claimant for water, at par with the States. (NOT a “use” within State’s share)

Accept

1. Research will not yield EF quantification

2. Quantum of EF can not be decided by environmental scientists, ‘a-priory’. Requires trade-off decisions with other uses.

3. Water for EF will have to be negotiated with other users, on a equal basis.

4. Water for EF as volume, NOT as flow rate in a reach

5. Env. as an independent claimant for water, at par with the States. (NOT a “use” within State’s share)

6. Water for EF can not be obtained through pompous rhetoric. Will have to argue for a share, before Tribunals.

Accept

1. Research will not yield EF quantification

2. Quantum of EF can not be decided by environmental scientists, ‘a-priory’. Requires trade-off decisions with other uses.

3. Water for EF will have to be negotiated with other users, on a equal basis.

4. Water for EF as volume, NOT as flow rate in a reach

5. Env. as an independent claimant for water, at par with the States. (NOT a “use” within State’s share)

6. Water for EF can not be obtained through pompous rhetoric. Will have to argue for a share, before Tribunals.

Accept

1. Research will not yield EF quantification

2. Quantum of EF can not be decided by environmental scientists, ‘a-priory’. Requires trade-off decisions with other uses.

3. Water for EF will have to be negotiated with other users, on a equal basis.

4. Water for EF as volume, NOT as flow rate in a reach

5. Env. as an independent claimant for water, at par with the States. (NOT a “use” within State’s share)

6. Water for EF can not be obtained through pompous rhetoric. Will have to argue for a share, before Tribunals.

7. Large Storages necessary to supply EF in lean season

Accept

1. Research will not yield EF quantification

2. Quantum of EF can not be decided by environmental scientists, ‘a-priory’. Requires trade-off decisions with other uses.

3. Water for EF will have to be negotiated with other users, on a equal basis.

4. Water for EF as volume, NOT as flow rate in a reach

5. Env. as an independent claimant for water, at par with the States. (NOT a “use” within State’s share)

6. Water for EF can not be obtained through pompous rhetoric. Will have to argue for a share, before Tribunals.

7. Large Storages necessary to supply EF in lean season

Accept

1. Research will not yield EF quantification

2. Quantum of EF can not be decided by environmental scientists, ‘a-priory’. Requires trade-off decisions with other uses.

3. Water for EF will have to be negotiated with other users, on a equal basis.

4. Water for EF as volume, NOT as flow rate in a reach

5. Env. as an independent claimant for water, at par with the States. (NOT a “use” within State’s share)

6. Water for EF can not be obtained through pompous rhetoric. Will have to argue for a share, before Tribunals.

7. Large Storages necessary to supply EF in lean season

Accept

1. Research will not yield EF quantification

2. Quantum of EF can not be decided by environmental scientists, ‘a-priory’. Requires trade-off decisions with other uses.

3. Water for EF will have to be negotiated with other users, on a equal basis.

4. Water for EF as volume, NOT as flow rate in a reach

5. Env. as an independent claimant for water, at par with the States. (NOT a “use” within State’s share)

6. Water for EF can not be obtained through pompous rhetoric. Will have to argue for a share, before Tribunals.

7. Large Storages necessary to supply EF in lean season

ThanksThanks