Distance-Variable Estimators for Sampling and Change Measurement

Post on 05-Jan-2016

31 views 1 download

Tags:

description

Distance-Variable Estimators for Sampling and Change Measurement. 8. 7. 6. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 0. 1. Western Mensurationists June 2006. Kim Iles PhD. Hugh Carter MSc (Candidate), RFT. hugh.carter@jsthrower.com. 8. 0. 7. 1. 6. 2. 5. 3. 4. 4. 3. 5. 2. 6. 7. 1. 8. 0. 9. 1. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Distance-Variable Estimators for Sampling and Change Measurement

Distance-Variable Estimators for Sampling and Change Measurement

Western Mensurationists June 2006

hugh.carter@jsthrower.com

Hugh Carter MSc (Candidate), RFT

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1

Kim Iles PhD.

Outline

2. Bias (or lack of)

3. Shapes

5. Compatibility

9. Summary

4. Change over time

6. Simple example

8. Future Work

1. Background

7. Edge

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 98 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1

Background

• Need a solution for applying VRP for measuring change over time.

• Problems encountered include:

- High variability due to on-growth. - Extending concepts to variables other than volume and BA. - Providing a solution that is easily applied and understood.

• A reminder of why we might want to use Variable Radius Plots (VRP) for measuring change:

- Efficiency (cost and time). - Remeasurement of existing plots. - Increase precision?

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 98 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1

• Attempts have been made to solve these problems, however none have covered them all.

• Distance-Variable estimators reduce variability, extend to any variable for any object of interest, and provide an easy to apply method.

Background Continued

• Distance-Variable estimators are an extension of the “Iles method” to any variable of interest on any sampled object of interest.

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 98 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1

Bias

i

ii

P

VV

T

ii A

AP T

n

i i

iT A

A

VValue

t

1

Horvitz-Thompson Estimator

Potential random sample points

Object of interest

Inclusion circle

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 98 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1

Bias Continued

i

i

i

si

A

V

A

V ,

Ts

n

s

n

i i

si

T An

A

V

Value

s t

1 1

,

Expectation of

Potential random sample points

Object of interest

Inclusion circle

Distance-Variable Estimator

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 98 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1

Shapes

Why Use a Cone?

3x Value

0x Value

• Average at all potential sample points will give estimate

• Easy to use and visualize - height at point is 3x value - height at base is 0x value

• Can get a simple “Value Gradient”

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 98 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1

Shapes Continued

How do they work?

111 m2/s2/kg

0 m2/s2/kg

Average of all sample points is 37 m2/s2/kg

• Units no longer an issue

• Average at sample points give estimate

• Sample point is ¼ of distance from edge

• Estimate = ¼ * 111m2/s2/kg = 27.37m2/s2/kg

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 98 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1

Change Over Time

Traditional Subtraction Method0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 98 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1

Change Over Time

Distance-Variable Method0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 98 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1

Compatibility0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 98 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1

12 VVV

Both methods are compatible, however the traditional subtraction method is more variable!

0 1 2 3 4Tree 1 0 0 10 10 10Tree 2 10 10 10 10 10Tree 3 10 10 10 0 0Total 20 20 30 20 20

Measurement Time

Basal Area Example

Traditional Method (BAF 10m2/ha)

Distance-Variable Method (BAF 10m2/ha)

0 1 2 3 4Tree 1 0 0 3 8 12Tree 2 8 12 17 22 25Tree 3 12 13 14 0 0Total 20 25 34 30 37

Measurement Time

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 98 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1

On-growth

Total

On-growth

Total

Mortality

Survivor

On-Growth

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

0 1 2 3 4

Measurement

BA

/ha Total

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

0 1 2 3 4

Measurement

BA

/ha

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

0 1 2 3 4

Measurement

BA

/ha

0 1 2 3 4Tree 1 0 0 10 10 10Tree 2 10 10 10 10 10Tree 3 10 10 10 0 0Total 20 20 30 20 20

Measurement Time

Basal Area Example

Traditional Method (BAF 10m2/ha)

Distance-Variable Method (BAF 10m2/ha)

0 1 2 3 4Tree 1 0 0 3 8 12Tree 2 8 12 17 22 25Tree 3 12 13 14 0 0Total 20 25 34 30 37

Measurement Time

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 98 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1

Survivor

Total

Survivor

Total

Mortality

Survivor

On-Growth

Total

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

0 1 2 3 4

Measurement

BA

/ha

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

0 1 2 3 4

Measurement

BA

/ha

0 1 2 3 4Tree 1 0 0 10 10 10Tree 2 10 10 10 10 10Tree 3 10 10 10 0 0Total 20 20 30 20 20

Measurement Time

Basal Area Example

Traditional Method (BAF 10m2/ha)

Distance-Variable Method (BAF 10m2/ha)

0 1 2 3 4Tree 1 0 0 3 8 12Tree 2 8 12 17 22 25Tree 3 12 13 14 0 0Total 20 25 34 30 37

Measurement Time

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 98 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1

Mortality

Total

Mortality

Total

Mortality

Survivor

On-Growth

Total

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

0 1 2 3 4

Measurement

BA

/ha

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

0 1 2 3 4

Measurement

BA

/ha

0 1 2 3 4Tree 1 0 0 10 10 10Tree 2 10 10 10 10 10Tree 3 10 10 10 0 0Total 20 20 30 20 20

Measurement Time

Basal Area Example

Traditional Method (BAF 10m2/ha)

Distance-Variable Method (BAF 10m2/ha)

0 1 2 3 4Tree 1 0 0 3 8 12Tree 2 8 12 17 22 25Tree 3 12 13 14 0 0Total 20 25 34 30 37

Measurement Time

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

0 1 2 3 4

Measurement

BA

/ha

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 98 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1

On-growthSurvivor Mortality

Total

On-growthSurvivor Mortality

Total

Mortality Tree

Survivor Tree

On-Growth Tree

Total

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

0 1 2 3 4

Measurement

BA

/ha

Total

Mortality Tree Survivor Tree

On-Growth Tree

Edge

• Existing techniques for correcting edge remain applicable.

- Walk-through

- Toss-back

- Mirage

• Unbiased if inclusion areas are symmetrical through the tree.

• If extra sample points are needed the DV estimator is used instead of the traditional estimator.

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 98 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1

Future Work

• Variance control through different shaped estimators.

• Density surface mapping.

• Efficiency/Precision gains?

• Non-stationary object sampling.

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 98 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1

Summary

• Unbiased

• EXTENDS TO ANY VARIABLE FOR ANY OBJECT!!

• Easy to apply and understand

• Compatible

• Smoothes change/growth curves

• Works with existing edge techniques

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 98 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1

Distance-Variable Method

Acknowledgements

Kim Iles & Associates

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 98 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1

Volume Example

0 1 2 3 4Tree 1 0 0 2 2.5 3Tree 2 1.1 1.3 1.7 2.1 2.2Tree 3 0.9 1.1 1.2 0 0

Measurement Time

0 1 2 3 4Tree 1 0 0 0.1 0.4 0.9Tree 2 2.2 2.5 2.9 3.4 3.6Tree 3 1 1.3 1.4 0 0

Measurement Time

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

0 1 2 3 4

Measurement

Tre

e V

olu

me

Tree 1

Tree 2

Tree 3

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

0 1 2 3 4

Measurement

Tre

e V

olu

me

Tree 1

Tree 2

Tree 3

Traditional Method

Distance-Variable Method

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 98 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1

Summary

2. Bias (or lack of)

3. Shapes

5. Compatibility

9. Summary

4. Change over time

6. Simple example

8. Future Work

1. Background

7. Edge

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 98 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1