Conventional Solids Control System Design - NFLBnflb.no/wp-content/uploads/2007_Axiom.pdf ·...

Post on 23-May-2018

215 views 2 download

Transcript of Conventional Solids Control System Design - NFLBnflb.no/wp-content/uploads/2007_Axiom.pdf ·...

Process LtdProcess Ltd

Axiom Process Ltd.

A Privately owned, UK, Company Engaged in the Manufacturing & Supply of Equipment to the Upstream Oil & Gas Industry.Established in 2001 with the Strategic Objective of Developing a Shale Shaker offering the Industry a Step Change in Fluid Handling & Solids Separation Performance.Principals all have Extensive Experience in the Business, having been Responsible for the Development of the VSM Family of Shale Shakers and Screens with Thule Rigtech.

An Enhanced Design Concept for Solids Control Systems

Dr R C MintonBusiness Development Manager

Axiom Process Ltd

Filter Cake Quality

Classic Solids Control System Design

Limitations of Classic Designs

Poor Overall solids removal efficiency – High dilution rates.

Limited ability to handle high flow rates.

Limited ability to handle cold drilling fluids.

Degradation of Drilled Cuttings in secondary processes & pumps.

High liquid discharges through secondary solids control equipment (Increased waste)

14.5

40.736.4

8.6

05

1015202530354045

% O

il on

Cut

tings

(dry

wt)

Shaker Desander Desilter Centrifuge

Oil Discharges

Typical Solids Control System Design Upgrade

Upgrade Benefits & Limitations

Benefits:Improved solids removal efficiency

Reduced liquid wastes

Limitations:Added system complexity & weight

Breakdown of solids not addressed

Fine solids added back into system

Increased capital costs

Requirement for dedicated supervisor

Cone inefficiencies not addressed

Hydrocyclone Performance

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 20 40 60 80 100 120Equivalent Spherical Diameter (μ)

Cum

ulat

ive

Volu

me

%

4” Desilter (PV = 5)4” Desilter (PV = 27)

Assuming Linear Feed Distribution

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 20 40 60 80 100 120Equivalent Spherical Diameter (μ)

Cum

ulat

ive

Volu

me

%

4” Desilter200 Mesh Screen

Assuming Linear Feed Distribution (PV = 27)

Hydrocyclone Performance

Alternative Solids Control System Design Upgrade

Upgrade Benefits & Limitations

Benefits:Improved primary solids removal efficiency

Cone inefficiencies addressed

Breakdown of solids in pumps addressed

Reduced liquid wastes

Reduced system complexity

Limitations:No improvements in system weight & footprint.

Requirement for dedicated supervisor

Difficulty in balancing flow between all eight shakers.

The AX-1 Shale Shaker

The Concept

The AX1 has been Designed to

Offer a Step Change in Primary

Solids Control Performance

The AX-1 is Capable of delivering ±100% more capacity than the best alternatives; The AX1 offers significant improvements

and flexibility in fluid processing

Axiom AX-1 Operating Modes

The AX-1 has two Operating Modes with the Ability to quickly change from one to the other.

Series Mode: Drilling Fluid Processed through all Three Screens in Succession.

Fine Mesh Screening

Maximum Solids Separation

Parallel Mode: Drilling Fluid Processed Independently through the Middle & Lower Screens

Maximum Flow Capacity

40GPM 400GPM400GPM

Operating Modes

400GPM 800GPM

Series

Parallel

The Parallel Concept

400GPM

800GPM

400GPM 400GPM

400GPM

The Parallel Concept

…and in Series…

400GPM

400GPM

400GPM

400GPM

40 / 60 mesh

175 / 210 mesh

250 / 300 mesh

Series Operation

ObjectivesImproved Separation through consecutive screening

Improved Screen Life (Improved Fine Screen Protection)

Switching Modes

Parallel

Switching Modes

Series

Axiom AX-1 Triple Deck Shale Shaker

Performance Summary

Field Trial – Glomar Arctic IV

Designed to deliver significantly higher fluid capacity than competitive machines, the AX-1:Handled ±70% of the feed (±800GPM) on both 17½” hole sections whilst fitted with 140 thru 175 mesh screens –with ROP averaging 25-30m/hr. The 17½” section was drilled with KCl/PHPA/Glycol mudHandled 100% of the feed (±950GPM) on both 12¼” hole sections whilst fitted with 210 mesh screens – with ROP averaging 25-30m/hr. The 12¼” section was drilled with OBMContinued to maintain LGS levels below 3% (without the use of centrifuges) throughout both 12¼” sectionsSignificantly reduced screen costs through the operation of fewer shakers and longer screen lifePilot testing has shown potential for the use of the 3-deck arrangement to allow recovery of significant quantities (>70%) of LCM/bridging materialCompany Men, Mud Engineers, Toolpushers & Rig Crew all stated their approval of the system – it was also commented that the AX-1 was notably quieter than competitive equipment (77.2dBA at 1m)

Roger Mowell – Field Data

AX-1s field performance fully met Expectations.Early mechanical problems rectified.300 mesh screens routinely used.Low Gravity Solids concentration maintained with limited centrifuge useDilution volume decreased by an average of 30% over 9000M of 8 ½” hole (circa 700 bbls v 1000 bbls per hole section)Over 9 * 81/2” Hole Sections only 8 Screen Panels were Discarded

AX-1 Shaker Deliveries

0102030405060

July Oct Feb May Aug Nov

Month

Total No. of AX-1s Delivered

AX-1 Shaker Deliveries

Axiom

Shale Shaker Screening System

Axiom AX- – Screen Configuration

Axiom AX- – Screen Support Frame

Axiom AX Screen Panel

Screen Concept

Screen Concept

Screen Characteristics

Light & Easy to HandleAxiom Screen Weight – 4.5 Kg

Composite Frame Screen Weight – 8.2 Kg

Metal Frame Screen Weight – 13 Kg

Clamping Ensures Correct Mesh Tension is Maintained

Connecting ‘Lug’ Design Ensures a Close Fit between Panels

Clamping Further Assists Closure of any Gap between the Panels and holds the Joint tight to the Gasket Seal on the Screen Support Frame

Screen mesh utilization

AX-1 Shaker Performance

Enhanced Fluid Handling Capacity

Improved Fine Screening Capabilities

Improved Control of Low Gravity Solids Build-up

Reduced Fluid Dilution Requirements

Significant Reductions in Screen Costs

Ease of Screen Changing

Step change Design Upgrade for the Solids Control System

Step Change Benefits & Limitations

Benefits:

Smaller footprint.

Lighter installation.

Issues of fluid distribution to shale shakers has been addressed.

Space freed up below shakers now available for Customer specific cuttings processing.

Overall reduction in capital costs.

Thank you for your attention:

I would welcome any Questions

For Further Information please contact:

support@axiomprocess.com

rminton@axiomprocess.com

Or call me (Reg Minton) on +44 7823 539059