Post on 27-Jan-2016
description
. Maharashtra’s Social and Health Sector Budget: A Note on Emerging Characteristics and Trends
Seminar onMaharashtra’s Budget: A Scrutiny of Development Discourse
March 25, 2011Organised by CEHAT and other Partners
Anita RathAssociate Professor
Centre for Development StudiesTata Institute of Social Sciences
Maharashtra’s Social Sector: Areas of Concern
Regional Disparity:
a. As per the per capita district income figures of 2009-10, Gadchiroli has less than one-third income of Mumbai; it’s income is just 50% of the average income of the state.
b. Human development indices for 2001 computed for the six revenue divisions range from 0.723 for Konakan to 0.646 for Nagpur, with the average for the state at 0.672.
Anita Rath
109824
7978863179 58464
46535 46340
020000400006000080000
100000120000
Fig: Per Capita District Income for various Revenue Divisions of Maharshtra, 2009-10
( Current Prices; Economic Survey, 2010-11)
Anita Rath
High Incidence of Poverty
a. It has a relatively high incidence of poverty, which is marginally lower than UP.
b. Unequal Distribution of Poverty: Coastal area has relatively low incidence, the rest of the state, particularly eastern region exhibit persistent and very high level of poverty.
c. Particular social groups have significantly higher poverty levels than others; More than half of the rural STs are estimated to be poor.
Anita Rath
Issues Related to Education
a. Literacy rate of the state is 77% (Census)/ 78.2% (NSS 64th
Round-2007-08), but more than half the population does not continue education beyond primary level.
b. Education Development Index constructed by NUEPA put Maharashtra at the 7th rank among the larger states in 2007-08.Maharashtra has a value of 0.727 of the index with the range for larger states being 0.791 (Kerala) to 0.406 (Bihar)
Anita Rath
Health Sector
a. As per the estimates of district-wise IMR (Census, 2001), districts like Gadchiroli, Gondiya and Chandrapur in the Vidarbha region have an IMR which is as high as some of the worst states.
b. The percentage of institutional deliveries and immunisation rates were as low as 20.5 and 36.9 in Gadchiroli in comparison to 89.1 and 92.2 in the district of Mumbai (Suburban).
c. The variation in performance across districts is associated with the variation in the percentage of ST population and accessibility to health facilities across districts.
d. Other specific issues: Vector Borne Diseases- the reported number of cases of malaria and dengue has not declined and the state has not moved towards achieving national level target; Cases and deaths due to acute diarrhoea are relatively high in the state and the declining trend is not discernible.
Anita Rath
Trend of Social Sector Expenditure In India
-Public Expenditure Ratio- Social Allocation Ratio
Anita Rath
20222426283032
1987
-88
1988
-89
1989
-90
1990
-91
1991
-92
1992
-93
1993
-94
1994
-95
1995
-96
1996
-97
1997
-98
1998
-99
1999
-00
2000
-01
2001
-02
2002
-03
2003
-04
2004
-05
2005
-06
2006
-07
2007
-08
Publ
ic E
xpen
ditu
re a
s %
of
GDP
Year
Combined (Centre+States) Public Expenditure as Per Cent of GDP
40424446485052545658
1987
-88
1988
-89
1989
-90
1990
-91
1991
-92
1992
-93
1993
-94
1994
-95
1995
-96
1996
-97
1997
-98
1998
-99
1999
-00
2000
-01
2001
-02
2002
-03
2003
-04
2004
-05
2005
-06
2006
-07
2007
-08
Dev
. eXP
. as
% o
f Agg
. Exp
endi
ture
Year
Development Expenditure as Per Cent of Aggregate Expenditure
Anita Rath
1990-91
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
(RE)
2009-10
(BE)
14.7 12 12.1 11.9 13.1 11.3 11.9 12.6 13 15.4 14.5
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
% o
f GD
P
Development Exp as Per Cent of GDP (Combined)
1990-91
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
(RE)
2009-10
(BE)
4.4 4.3 4.2 4.1 4 3.8 3.9 4 3.8 4.4 4.6
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
% o
f GD
P
Select SSE Exp as Per Cent of GDP (Combined)( Education, fam welfare, medical and public health and water
supply and sanitation)
Anita Rath
1990-91 1998-99 2007-08
States 85 80 69
Centre 15 20 31
85 8069
15 2031
0102030405060708090
Perc
enta
geFig3: Relative Share of Centre and States in Social Sector
Expenditure
States
Centre
Anita Rath
0
20
40
60
80
100
Education, Art and Culture
Medical and Public Health, Water
Supply and Sanitation
Family Welfare Social and Community Services
(1 to 8)
Rural Development
90 91 9484 9088 89 86 82
6478 83
27
73
46
Fig 4: Relative Share States in Select Social Sectors
1990-91 1998-99 2007-08
Anita Rath
Anita Rath
Maharashtra’s Social Sector Expenditure
Anita Rath
Anita Rath
Anita Rath
Table 4: Social Sector Expenditure as per cent of GSDP
1980-85
1985-90
1990-95
1995-00
2000-05
2005-10
Andhra Pradesh 6.8 8.9 7.1 7.1 6.8 7.9
Gujarat 5.3 7.1 6.0 5.7 6.5 5.1
Kerala 7.6 9.2 7.9 7.8 6.7 5.8
Tamil Nadu 6.4 7.8 7.8 6.7 6.4 6.7
Maharashtra 4.9 6.6 5.7 5.3 5.6 5.8
Bihar 6.1 8.1 8.9 9.5 10.4 13.6
All States 4.8 6.1 5.8 5.5 5.5 5.8
Anita Rath
States2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09(RE)
2009-10(BE)
Andhra Pradesh 35.6 35.0 32.5 33.3 29.3 30.8 32.9 32.7 40.8 35.3
Gujarat 35.6 35.2 30.4 27.3 29.0 32.1 33.4 34.9 35.1 37.1
Kerala 39.9 37.6 37.4 30.0 36.2 35.6 31.0 31.4 34.3 35.3
Tamil Nadu 39.4 37.0 32 34.3 32.6 36.9 33.1 35.9 40.1 38.1
Maharashtra 36.6 36.4 33.3 30.9 28.1 35.3 37.3 37.0 37.6 49.9
Bihar 43.7 38.9 36.4 36.7 30.5 38.4 41.0 43.8 45.1 44.5
Table 5: SSE as a percentage of TE: Select States
Anita Rath
12.8
13.1
14.2
14.2
14.3
14.5
14.6
14.8
14.9
15.6
15.8
15.8
16.3
16.7
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0
KeralaPunjab
BiharMadhya Pradesh
West BengalOrissa
GujaratUttar Pradesh
Tamil NaduAndhra Pradesh
KarnatakaRajasthan
MaharashtraHaryana
CARG
States
Fig 3: CARG of Social Sector Expenditure- 1980-2010 (All States:15.3)
Anita Rath
10.111.3
11.611.8
12.412.412.5
12.913.2
13.613.81414.1
15.8
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Madhya PradeshPunjabKeralaBihar
Uttar PradeshWest Bengal
GujaratOrissa
RajasthanTamil Nadu
Andhra PradeshKarnataka
HaryanaMaharashtra
CARG %
State
sFig: CARG (%) in Per Capita Social Sector Expenditure
Anita Rath
AP
BI
GUHA
KA KE
MP
MA
OR PURA
TN
UP
WB
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000Pe
r C
ap
ita
SS
E (
20
00
-20
05
)
Per Capita NSDP (2000-2005)
Fig: Per Capita NSDP and Per Capita SSE(Current Prices, Avg: 2000-2005)
AP
BI
GUHA
KAKE
MP
MA
OR PURA
TN
UP
WB
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000
Pe
r Cap
ita
Re
al S
SE (
2000
-200
5)
Per Capita Real NSDP (2000-2005)
Fig: Per Capita Real NSDP and Per Capita Real SSE(Avg: 2000-2005)
Anita Rath
AP
BI
GUHA
KAKE
MP
MA
OR PU
RATN
UP
WB
0500
1000150020002500300035004000450050005500
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 50000 55000
Per C
apita
SSE (
2005
-201
0)
Per Capita NSDP (2005-2008)
Fig: Per Capita NSDP (Avg: 2005-2008)and Per Capita SSE(Avg: 2005-2010), Current Prices
Anita Rath
5.2
6.15.7
5.25.5
5.35.5 5.5
4.9
5.6
7.2
4.55.05.56.06.57.07.5
Fig: Expenditure on Social Sectors as a Percentage of GSDP
Anita Rath
Total(Rs. In Crs)
1990-91 30.6 37921995-96 33.9 83612000-01 15.9 154292006-07 26.4 282762007-08 30.7 297212008-09(RE) 35.6 385152009-10(BE) 53.6 59821
Year Plan
0.05.0
10.015.020.025.030.035.040.0
% of
Tota
l
Year
Figure 4: PLan and Non-Plan Components of SSE in Maharashtra-1990-91 to 2007-08
Anita Rath
Table: Social Sector Expenditure of Maharashtra-Revenue and Capital (Rs. in Lakhs)
Capital Exp. Revenue Exp.
Item Capital % Loans % Tot Cap % Tot Rev Total
1990-91 6686 38.6 10621 61.4 17307 4.6 361893 95.4 379200
1995-96 11111 25.6 32269 74.4 43380 5.2 792733 94.8 836113
2000-01 22041 45.0 26949 55.0 48990 3.2 1493888 96.8 1542878
2005-06 183276 81.3 42236 18.7 225512 9.3 2201302 90.7 2426814
2006-07 147593 72.1 57014 27.9 204607 7.2 2623006 92.8 2827613
2007-08 129373 72.1 50084 27.9 179457 6.0 2792668 94.0 2972125
2008-09(RE) 292334 87.0 43623 13.0 335957 8.7 3515569 91.3 3851526
2009-10(BE) 1284328 97.3 36088 2.7 1320416 22.1 4661680 77.9 5982096 Source: Calculated from data Provided in RBI State Finances
Anita Rath
0 2 4 6 8 10
1990-911995-962000-012005-062006-072007-08
4.65.2
3.29.3
7.26
% of SSE
Year
Fig: Share of Capital Expenditure in Total Social Sector Expenditure
Anita Rath
Education etc, 45.9
Health etc, 13.1
Water Supply and
Sanitation, 5.6
Housing, 4.2
Urban Development,
2.3
Welfare of SCs, STs, OBCs,
3.9
Rural Development,
13.1
Others, 10.51990-91
Education etc, 46.4
Health etc, 9.4Water Supply
and Sanitation, 5.7
Housing, 4.6
Urban Development,
7.8
Welfare of SCs, STs, OBCs,
9.3
Rural Development,
5.1Others, 8.9
2007-08
Anita Rath
2.9
3.73.4
3.02.8 2.6
2.5 2.4 2.32.4 2.3
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
Fig: Expenditure on Education, Sports, Art and Culture as a Percentage of GSDP
Anita Rath
Expenditure on Education-As Ratio to Aggregate Expenditure
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09(RE)
2009-10(BE)
Andhra Pradesh 13.3 12.5 11.7 11.6 9.8 11.1 10.8 9.0 11.2 11.1 Kerala 20.0 19.0 17.6 15.7 16.2 16.6 17.1 15.9 16.8 17.5 Gujarat 13.6 12.7 13.5 11.2 11.5 12.6 12.7 13.4 11.6 11.5 Tamil Nadu 18.0 17.3 13.8 12.6 11.2 13.6 12.2 12.7 13.8 14.9 Maharashtra 22.3 22.1 18.9 15.5 14.0 15.7 16.4 17.2 16.3 16.2 Bihar 23.7 20.7 18.4 18.9 15.8 19.6 19.7 17.6 16.6 18.8 Orissa 15.9 14.6 14.3 12.2 12.6 14.7 12.8 14.3 16.0 18.3 All States 17.4 16.2 15.1 12.6 12.7 14.2 14.0 13.8 14.4 15.1
Anita Rath
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
Fig: Expenditure on Education-As Ratio to Aggregate Expenditure- Select States
Kerala
Gujarat
Tamil Nadu
Maharashtra
Anita Rath
0.6
0.6 0.7
0.6 0.60.5 0.5
0.5 0.50.5
0.40.40.40.50.50.60.60.70.7
Fig: Expenditure on Medical, Public Health and Family Welfare as a Percentage of GSDP
Anita Rath
Expenditure on Medical and Public Health and Family Welfare-As Ratio to Aggregate Expenditure
2000-
01 2001-
02 2002-
03 2003-
04 2004-
05 2005-
06 2006-
07 2007-
08 2008-09(RE)
2009-10(BE)
Andhra Pradesh 4.7 4.4 4 3.7 3.2 3.4 3.3 3.3 3.4 3.8 Kerala 5.3 5.8 4.8 4.3 4.5 4.7 4.9 4.5 4.7 4.7 Gujarat 3.4 2.8 3.2 2.7 2.8 3.1 2.9 3.2 3.0 3.4 Tamil Nadu 4.9 4.9 4.1 3.8 3.2 4.2 3.3 3.3 3.8 4.8 Maharashtra 3.9 4.3 3.7 3.2 2.7 3.2 3.1 3.5 3.4 2.8 Bihar 5.9 4.9 4.2 3.8 3.1 4.5 4.2 4.4 3.9 3.8 Orissa 4.2 3.7 3.8 3.2 4.0 3.0 3.1 3.3 3.9 5.0 All States 4.6 4.4 4.0 3.4 3.4 3.9 3.9 3.8 4.1 4.2
Anita Rath
3.94.3
3.73.2
2.73.2 3.1
3.5 3.42.8
2.5
3.5
4.5
5.5
6.5
Fig: Expenditure on Medical, Public Health and Family Welfare- As Ratio to Aggregate Expenditure :Select
States
Kerala
Tamil Nadu
Maharashtra
All States
Anita Rath
0.1 0.1 0.10.2
0.20.3
0.30.4
0.5
0.2
0.10.20.20.30.30.40.40.50.5
Fig: Expenditure on Urban Development as a Percentage of GSDP
Anita Rath
0.3 0.3 0.3 0.30.3 0.4
0.40.5 0.5
0.6
0.3
0.10.20.30.40.50.60.7
Fig: Expenditure on Welfare of SC, ST and OBCs as a Percentage of GSDP
Anita Rath
0.2 0.2 0.2 0.30.6 0.6 0.6 0.6
0.2 0.4
3.4
0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.0
Fig: Expenditure on Rural Development as a Percentage of GSDP
Anita Rath
0.2 0.2 0.20.3
0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6
0.20.4
0.0
0.5
1.0
Fig: Expenditure on Rural Development as a Percentage of GSDP
Anita Rath
Issues of Utilisation of Funds
Anita Rath
Poverty Alleviation Programmes SGSY 2000-01 (Utilisation- 75%)
2001-2008: above 90%
NREGA 2007-08: (allocation-Rs. 49783.33 lakhs: Utilisation: 37.97%) 2008-09: (allocation-Rs. 51536.06 lakhs; Utilisation: 43.09%)
IAY 2001-02: (allocation-Rs. 16460.95 lakhs; Utilisation: 82%) 2002-07: (allocation-Rs. 22766 lakhs to Rs. 24513 lakhs; Utilisation: more than 90%) 2007-08 upto Oct.: Utilisation 37%
Anita Rath
Education SSA 2002-03 (allocation-Rs. 43122 lakhs; Utilisation: 22%)
2003-04 (allocation-Rs. 76477 lakhs; Utilisation: 44%) 2007-08 (allocation-Rs. 89523 lakhs; Utilisation: 60%)
MDM 2004-05 (allocation-Rs. 26463 lakhs; Utilisation: 66%) 2005-06 (allocation-Rs. 25741 lakhs; Utilisation: 87%) 2006-07 (allocation-Rs. 46924 lakhs; Utilisation: 68%)
Anita Rath
Health ES 2009-10 Funds for Health in State Plans
2008-09 (Outlay-Rs. 1156.46 crs; Utilisation: Rs. 555.25 Rate: 48%) 2009-10 upto October (Outlay-Rs. 1193.19 crs; Utilisation: Rs. 125.33 Rate: 10.5%)
NRHM 2005-06 (Grant Sanctioned: Rs.24.18 Crs; Exp. Incurred:Rs. 1.93 Crs; Rate: 8%) 2006-07 (Grant Sanctioned: Rs.136.25; Exp. Incurred:Rs. 8.89 Crs; Rate: 6.5%)
RCH Phase II 2005-06 (Grant Sanctioned: Rs.53.07 Crs; Exp. Incurred:Rs. 14.37 Crs; Rate: 27%) 2006-07 (Grant Sanctioned: Rs.124.34; Exp. Incurred:Rs.40.53 Crs; Rate: 33%)
Anita Rath
Table: Additional Resource Requirement (Rs. Crs) (Sen at al, 2010)
Purpose 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12
Housing 204 214 225
Education 464 500 547
Health etc. 996 1046 1099
Anita Rath
Budget: 2011-12
Anita Rath
Budget: 2011-12% increase over the last
yearExtra Amount (Rs. in Bn)
Rural Development 273% 2431.69
Welfare of Backward Classes
114% 851.79
Health and Family Welfare 88% 224.82
Social Welfare and Nutrition
340% 85.47
Education 38% 57.85
Water Supply and Sanitation
25% 71.98
Housing 30% 13.99
Urban Development 366% 0.11
Other Social Services 50% 63.5Anita Rath
Share of Salaries and Interest Payments in Revenue Expenditure (ES 2010-11)
Year Salaries Interest Payments
2006-07 38.6 19.3
2007-08 34.6 16.2
2008-09 37.9 16.0
2009-10 (RE) 49.4 16.6
2010-11 (BE) 53.3 17.0
Anita Rath
References
Sen, Tapas K. and others (2010), Matching Human Development Across Maharashtra with its Economic Development, Financing Human Development Series-VIII, NIPFP, New Delhi.
Dev, S. Mahendra and Jos Mooji (2002), Social Sector Expenditures in the 19990s: Analysis of Central and State Budgets, EPW, Vol. 37, No. 2.
RBI, Various Years, State Finances- A Study of Budgets, 2009-10.
RBI, Various Years, Handbook of Statistics on Indian Economy.
Ministry of Finance (GOI) (2009-10), Indian Public Finance Statistics.
Government of Maharashtra, Various Years, Economic Survey
Anita Rath
Thank you
Anita Rath