Adaptive designs - an overview and some examples · Motivation Adaptive Designs Examples How and...

Post on 23-Jul-2018

215 views 0 download

Transcript of Adaptive designs - an overview and some examples · Motivation Adaptive Designs Examples How and...

Adaptive designs - an overview and someexamples

Thomas Jaki Philip PallmannLancaster University

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Attrition rates for new developments (Arrowsmith 2011a, 2011b)

phase II: >80%

phase III & submission: ∼50%

Reasons for failure (Arrowsmith & Miller 2013)

Phase II (2011–2012)

Efficacy Safety Other

Phase III & submission (2011–2012)

Efficacy Safety Other

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 2

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Attrition rates for new developments (Arrowsmith 2011a, 2011b)

phase II: >80%

phase III & submission: ∼50%

Reasons for failure (Arrowsmith & Miller 2013)

Phase II (2011–2012)

Efficacy Safety Other

Phase III & submission (2011–2012)

Efficacy Safety Other

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 3

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Attrition rates for new developments (Arrowsmith 2011a, 2011b)

phase II: >80%

phase III & submission: ∼50%

Reasons for failure (Arrowsmith & Miller 2013)

Phase II (2011–2012)

Efficacy Safety Other

Phase III & submission (2011–2012)

Efficacy Safety Other

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 4

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Attrition rates for new developments (Arrowsmith 2011a, 2011b)

phase II: >80%

phase III & submission: ∼50%

Reasons for failure (Arrowsmith & Miller 2013)

Phase II (2011–2012)

Efficacy Safety Other

Phase III & submission (2011–2012)

Efficacy Safety Other

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 5

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Attrition rates for new developments (Arrowsmith 2011a, 2011b)

phase II: >80%

phase III & submission: ∼50%

Reasons for failure (Arrowsmith & Miller 2013)

Phase II (2011–2012)

Efficacy Safety Other

Phase III & submission (2011–2012)

Efficacy Safety Other

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 6

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Likely causes for failure:

taking forward futile treatments

studying the wrong patient population

poor precision (optimal dose, maximum tolerated dose, safety)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 7

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Likely causes for failure:

taking forward futile treatments

studying the wrong patient population

poor precision (optimal dose, maximum tolerated dose, safety)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 8

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Likely causes for failure:

taking forward futile treatments

studying the wrong patient population

poor precision (optimal dose, maximum tolerated dose, safety)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 9

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Likely causes for failure:

taking forward futile treatments

studying the wrong patient population

poor precision (optimal dose, maximum tolerated dose, safety)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 10

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Can we do better?

avoid going straight into large and expensive phase III

take more care during phases I and II

consider adaptive and Bayesian designs

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 11

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Can we do better?

avoid going straight into large and expensive phase III

take more care during phases I and II

consider adaptive and Bayesian designs

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 12

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Can we do better?

avoid going straight into large and expensive phase III

take more care during phases I and II

consider adaptive and Bayesian designs

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 13

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Can we do better?

avoid going straight into large and expensive phase III

take more care during phases I and II

consider adaptive and Bayesian designs

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 14

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

2. Adaptive Designs

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 15

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Idea

Modify an ongoing trial

by design or ad hoc

based on reviewing accrued data at interim

to enhance flexibility

without undermining the study’s integrity and validity.(Chow et al. 2005)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 16

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Idea

Modify an ongoing trial

by design or ad hoc

based on reviewing accrued data at interim

to enhance flexibility

without undermining the study’s integrity and validity.(Chow et al. 2005)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 17

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Idea

Modify an ongoing trial

by design or ad hoc

based on reviewing accrued data at interim

to enhance flexibility

without undermining the study’s integrity and validity.(Chow et al. 2005)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 18

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Idea

Modify an ongoing trial

by design or ad hoc

based on reviewing accrued data at interim

to enhance flexibility

without undermining the study’s integrity and validity.(Chow et al. 2005)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 19

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Idea

Modify an ongoing trial

by design or ad hoc

based on reviewing accrued data at interim

to enhance flexibility

without undermining the study’s integrity and validity.(Chow et al. 2005)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 20

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Pros and cons

+ highly flexible

+ very efficient

+ reflects medical practice

+ shorter trial and/or moreaccurate estimates

+ ethical

– highly flexible

– inefficient

– time-consuming to design

– simple estimates may be biased

– interim analyses may requireunblinding

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 21

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Fixed sample design

Plan studyFix n

Start Final analysis

total sample size known in advance

no adjustment possible

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 22

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Fixed sample design

Plan studyFix n

Start Final analysis

total sample size known in advance

no adjustment possible

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 23

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Fixed sample design

Plan studyFix n

Start Final analysis

total sample size known in advance

no adjustment possible

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 24

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

(Group-)sequential design

Plan studyFix design

Start Interim analyses Final analysis

At each interim:

decide whether or not to stop

larger maximum sample size

lower expected sample size

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 25

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

(Group-)sequential design

Plan studyFix design

Start Interim analyses Final analysis

At each interim:

decide whether or not to stop

larger maximum sample size

lower expected sample size

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 26

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

(Group-)sequential design

Plan studyFix design

Start Interim analyses Final analysis

At each interim:

decide whether or not to stop

larger maximum sample size

lower expected sample size

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 27

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

(Group-)sequential design

Plan studyFix design

Start Interim analyses Final analysis

At each interim:

decide whether or not to stop

larger maximum sample size

lower expected sample size

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 28

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

(Group-)sequential design

Plan studyFix design

Start Interim analyses Final analysis

At each interim:

decide whether or not to stop

larger maximum sample size

lower expected sample size

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 29

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

(Group-)sequential design

Plan studyFix design

Start Interim analyses Final analysis

At each interim:

decide whether or not to stop

larger maximum sample size

lower expected sample size

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 30

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Adaptive design

Plan studyFix design

Start Interim analyses Final analysis

At each interim:

decide whether or not to stop

and many other options . . .

larger maximum sample size

lower expected sample size

possibly more relevant answer

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 31

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Adaptive design

Plan studyFix design

Start Interim analyses Final analysis

At each interim:

decide whether or not to stop

and many other options . . .

larger maximum sample size

lower expected sample size

possibly more relevant answer

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 32

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Adaptive design

Plan studyFix design

Start Interim analyses Final analysis

At each interim:

decide whether or not to stop

and many other options . . .

larger maximum sample size

lower expected sample size

possibly more relevant answer

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 33

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Adaptive design

Plan studyFix design

Start Interim analyses Final analysis

At each interim:

decide whether or not to stop

and many other options . . .

larger maximum sample size

lower expected sample size

possibly more relevant answer

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 34

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Adaptive design

Plan studyFix design

Start Interim analyses Final analysis

At each interim:

decide whether or not to stop

and many other options . . .

larger maximum sample size

lower expected sample size

possibly more relevant answer

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 35

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Adaptive design

Plan studyFix design

Start Interim analyses Final analysis

At each interim:

decide whether or not to stop

and many other options . . .

larger maximum sample size

lower expected sample size

possibly more relevant answer

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 36

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Adaptive design

Plan studyFix design

Start Interim analyses Final analysis

At each interim:

decide whether or not to stop

and many other options . . .

larger maximum sample size

lower expected sample size

possibly more relevant answer

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 37

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Adaptive design

Plan studyFix design

Start Interim analyses Final analysis

At each interim:

decide whether or not to stop

and many other options . . .

larger maximum sample size

lower expected sample size

possibly more relevant answer

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 38

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

How and what can we adapt?

Prospectively (“by design")

adaptive randomization

early stopping (safety, futility, efficacy)

drop-the-loser(s), pick-the-winner

sample size re-estimation (to achieve desired power)

Concurrently (“ad hoc")

modify inclusion/exclusion criteria

change primary endpoint

modify doses

extend treatment duration

change trial objective (e.g., non-inferiority→ superiority)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 39

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

How and what can we adapt?

Prospectively (“by design")

adaptive randomization

early stopping (safety, futility, efficacy)

drop-the-loser(s), pick-the-winner

sample size re-estimation (to achieve desired power)

Concurrently (“ad hoc")

modify inclusion/exclusion criteria

change primary endpoint

modify doses

extend treatment duration

change trial objective (e.g., non-inferiority→ superiority)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 40

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

How and what can we adapt?

Prospectively (“by design")

adaptive randomization

early stopping (safety, futility, efficacy)

drop-the-loser(s), pick-the-winner

sample size re-estimation (to achieve desired power)

Concurrently (“ad hoc")

modify inclusion/exclusion criteria

change primary endpoint

modify doses

extend treatment duration

change trial objective (e.g., non-inferiority→ superiority)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 41

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

How and what can we adapt?

Prospectively (“by design")

adaptive randomization

early stopping (safety, futility, efficacy)

drop-the-loser(s), pick-the-winner

sample size re-estimation (to achieve desired power)

Concurrently (“ad hoc")

modify inclusion/exclusion criteria

change primary endpoint

modify doses

extend treatment duration

change trial objective (e.g., non-inferiority→ superiority)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 42

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

How and what can we adapt?

Prospectively (“by design")

adaptive randomization

early stopping (safety, futility, efficacy)

drop-the-loser(s), pick-the-winner

sample size re-estimation (to achieve desired power)

Concurrently (“ad hoc")

modify inclusion/exclusion criteria

change primary endpoint

modify doses

extend treatment duration

change trial objective (e.g., non-inferiority→ superiority)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 43

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

How and what can we adapt?

Prospectively (“by design")

adaptive randomization

early stopping (safety, futility, efficacy)

drop-the-loser(s), pick-the-winner

sample size re-estimation (to achieve desired power)

Concurrently (“ad hoc")

modify inclusion/exclusion criteria

change primary endpoint

modify doses

extend treatment duration

change trial objective (e.g., non-inferiority→ superiority)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 44

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

How and what can we adapt?

Prospectively (“by design")

adaptive randomization

early stopping (safety, futility, efficacy)

drop-the-loser(s), pick-the-winner

sample size re-estimation (to achieve desired power)

Concurrently (“ad hoc")

modify inclusion/exclusion criteria

change primary endpoint

modify doses

extend treatment duration

change trial objective (e.g., non-inferiority→ superiority)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 45

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

How and what can we adapt?

Prospectively (“by design")

adaptive randomization

early stopping (safety, futility, efficacy)

drop-the-loser(s), pick-the-winner

sample size re-estimation (to achieve desired power)

Concurrently (“ad hoc")

modify inclusion/exclusion criteria

change primary endpoint

modify doses

extend treatment duration

change trial objective (e.g., non-inferiority→ superiority)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 46

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

How and what can we adapt?

Prospectively (“by design")

adaptive randomization

early stopping (safety, futility, efficacy)

drop-the-loser(s), pick-the-winner

sample size re-estimation (to achieve desired power)

Concurrently (“ad hoc")

modify inclusion/exclusion criteria

change primary endpoint

modify doses

extend treatment duration

change trial objective (e.g., non-inferiority→ superiority)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 47

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

How and what can we adapt?

Prospectively (“by design")

adaptive randomization

early stopping (safety, futility, efficacy)

drop-the-loser(s), pick-the-winner

sample size re-estimation (to achieve desired power)

Concurrently (“ad hoc")

modify inclusion/exclusion criteria

change primary endpoint

modify doses

extend treatment duration

change trial objective (e.g., non-inferiority→ superiority)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 48

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

How and what can we adapt?

Prospectively (“by design")

adaptive randomization

early stopping (safety, futility, efficacy)

drop-the-loser(s), pick-the-winner

sample size re-estimation (to achieve desired power)

Concurrently (“ad hoc")

modify inclusion/exclusion criteria

change primary endpoint

modify doses

extend treatment duration

change trial objective (e.g., non-inferiority→ superiority)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 49

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

How and what can we adapt?

Prospectively (“by design")

adaptive randomization

early stopping (safety, futility, efficacy)

drop-the-loser(s), pick-the-winner

sample size re-estimation (to achieve desired power)

Concurrently (“ad hoc")

modify inclusion/exclusion criteria

change primary endpoint

modify doses

extend treatment duration

change trial objective (e.g., non-inferiority→ superiority)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 50

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

A single-stage design

ABANDON

PROCEED

n

Z

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 51

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Simon’s two-stage design

ABANDON

PROCEED

CONTINUE

n1 n

Z

(Simon 1989)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 52

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

A multi-stage design

ABANDON

PROCEED

CONTINUE

n1 n2 n3 n

Z

(Whitehead 1997)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 53

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

A multi-stage design

n1

Z

CONTINUEx

(Whitehead 1997)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 54

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

A multi-stage design

n1 n2

Z

CONTINUEx x

(Whitehead 1997)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 55

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

A multi-stage design

n1 n2 n3

Z

PROCEEDx x

x

(Whitehead 1997)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 56

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Example 1: Sample size re-estimation

Problem:

sample size formulae depend on nuisance parameters e.g., σ2

Idea:

estimate the nuisance parameter(s) at interim and recalculate sample size

Methods:

for binary, Gaussian or survival outcomes

exact (with unblinding) or approximate (without unblinding) (Gould 1995)

negligible effect on type I error

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 57

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Example 1: Sample size re-estimation

Problem:

sample size formulae depend on nuisance parameters e.g., σ2

Idea:

estimate the nuisance parameter(s) at interim and recalculate sample size

Methods:

for binary, Gaussian or survival outcomes

exact (with unblinding) or approximate (without unblinding) (Gould 1995)

negligible effect on type I error

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 58

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Example 1: Sample size re-estimation

Problem:

sample size formulae depend on nuisance parameters e.g., σ2

Idea:

estimate the nuisance parameter(s) at interim and recalculate sample size

Methods:

for binary, Gaussian or survival outcomes

exact (with unblinding) or approximate (without unblinding) (Gould 1995)

negligible effect on type I error

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 59

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Example 1: Sample size re-estimation

Problem:

sample size formulae depend on nuisance parameters e.g., σ2

Idea:

estimate the nuisance parameter(s) at interim and recalculate sample size

Methods:

for binary, Gaussian or survival outcomes

exact (with unblinding) or approximate (without unblinding) (Gould 1995)

negligible effect on type I error

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 60

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Example 1: Sample size re-estimation

Problem:

sample size formulae depend on nuisance parameters e.g., σ2

Idea:

estimate the nuisance parameter(s) at interim and recalculate sample size

Methods:

for binary, Gaussian or survival outcomes

exact (with unblinding) or approximate (without unblinding) (Gould 1995)

negligible effect on type I error

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 61

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Example 1: Sample size re-estimation

Problem:

sample size formulae depend on nuisance parameters e.g., σ2

Idea:

estimate the nuisance parameter(s) at interim and recalculate sample size

Methods:

for binary, Gaussian or survival outcomes

exact (with unblinding) or approximate (without unblinding) (Gould 1995)

negligible effect on type I error

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 62

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Sample size re-estimationExample: DEVELOP-UK trial

transplantation of reconditioned vs. standard donor lungs

ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP)

phase III, multi-centre, unblinded, non-randomised,non-inferiority observational study

primary endpoint: 12 months survival

uncertainty in design parameters (only 50 transplantsworldwide)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 63

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Example 1: Sample size re-estimationDEVELOP-UK trial

408 patients randomised to EVLP and standard

3:1 in favour of standard to ensure all available lungs areused

interim analyses after 1/3 and 2/3 of total sample sizefirst: early stoppingsecond: early stopping, sample size re-assessment

significance levels: 0.005 (first), 0.014 (second), 0.045 (final)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 64

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Example 2: Phase I cancer trials

Dilemma:

low doses inefficient←→ high doses toxic

Goal:

find a maximum tolerated dose (MTD)where a prespecified proportion p0 of patients

experience dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 65

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Example 2: Phase I cancer trials

Dilemma:

low doses inefficient←→ high doses toxic

Goal:

find a maximum tolerated dose (MTD)where a prespecified proportion p0 of patients

experience dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 66

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Example 2: Phase I cancer trials

Designs:

3 + 3 design (Carter 1973)

. . . and variations (A + B, rolling 6, . . . )

other 1- or 2-stage up-and-down designs

accelerated titration design (Simon et al. 1999)

continual reassessment method (O’Quigley et al. 1990)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 67

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Example 2: Phase I cancer trials

Designs:

3 + 3 design (Carter 1973)

. . . and variations (A + B, rolling 6, . . . )

other 1- or 2-stage up-and-down designs

accelerated titration design (Simon et al. 1999)

continual reassessment method (O’Quigley et al. 1990)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 68

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Example 2: Phase I cancer trials

Designs:

3 + 3 design (Carter 1973)

. . . and variations (A + B, rolling 6, . . . )

accelerated titration design (Simon et al. 1999)

rule-based

continual reassessment method (O’Quigley et al. 1990) model-based

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 69

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Dose-finding / Phase I

Do NOT use rule based designs

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 70

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Example 2: Phase I cancer trials

Continual reassessment method (CRM):

Bayesian adaptive design

model-based

synthesizes prior belief about MTD and accumulating data

uses information from all previous patients (“memory")

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 71

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Example 2: Phase I cancer trials

Continual reassessment method (CRM):

Bayesian adaptive design

model-based

synthesizes prior belief about MTD and accumulating data

uses information from all previous patients (“memory")

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 72

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Example 2: Phase I cancer trials

Continual reassessment method (CRM):

Bayesian adaptive design

model-based

synthesizes prior belief about MTD and accumulating data

uses information from all previous patients (“memory")

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 73

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Example 2: Phase I cancer trials

Continual reassessment method (CRM):

Bayesian adaptive design

model-based

synthesizes prior belief about MTD and accumulating data

uses information from all previous patients (“memory")

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 74

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Example 2: Phase I cancer trials

Continual reassessment method (CRM):

Bayesian adaptive design

model-based

synthesizes prior belief about MTD and accumulating data

uses information from all previous patients (“memory")

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 75

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Example 2: Phase I cancer trials

A CRM design:

Dose

p

p0

D1 D2 D3 D4

based on prior belief

p: proportion of DLTs

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 76

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Example 2: Phase I cancer trials

A CRM design:

Dose

p

p0

D1 D2 D3 D4

based on prior belief

p: proportion of DLTs

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 77

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Example 2: Phase I cancer trials

A CRM design:

Dose

p

p0

D1 D2 D3 D4

based on prior belief

p: proportion of DLTs

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 78

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Example 2: Phase I cancer trials

A CRM design:

Dose

p

p0

D1 D2 D3 D4

based on prior belief

p: proportion of DLTs

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 79

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Example 2: Phase I cancer trials

A CRM design:

Dose

p

p0

D1 D2 D3 D4

based on prior belief

based on prior belief & data

p: proportion of DLTs

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 80

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Example 2: Phase I cancer trials

A CRM design:

Dose

p

p0

D1 D2 D3 D4

based on prior belief

based on prior belief & data

p: proportion of DLTs

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 81

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Example 2: Phase I cancer trials

A CRM design:

Dose

p

p0

D1 D2 D3 D4

based on prior belief

based on prior belief & data

p: proportion of DLTs

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 82

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Example 2: Phase I cancer trials

CRM vs. 3 + 3:

more likely to identify the correct dose

more patients receive doses near MTD

fewer overdoses

clearly defined MTD

MTD estimated with a measure of precision

efficient use of all data

flexible choice of toxicity levels

easily extendable

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 83

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Example 2: Phase I cancer trials

Seamless phase I/II designs:

phase I study “with a phase II flavour" (O’Quigley et al. 2001)

model toxicity and efficacy together

identify the most successful dose (MSD) rather than MTD

efficient (patient population of interest in phase I)

various methods using different models and stopping rules:

efficacy-toxicity trade-off (Thall & Russell 1998, Thall & Cook 2004)

CRM-like (O’Quigley et al. 2001, Zohar & O’Quigley 2006)

decision procedure for continuous response (Zhou et al. 2006)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 84

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Example 2: Phase I cancer trials

Seamless phase I/II designs:

phase I study “with a phase II flavour" (O’Quigley et al. 2001)

model toxicity and efficacy together

identify the most successful dose (MSD) rather than MTD

efficient (patient population of interest in phase I)

various methods using different models and stopping rules:

efficacy-toxicity trade-off (Thall & Russell 1998, Thall & Cook 2004)

CRM-like (O’Quigley et al. 2001, Zohar & O’Quigley 2006)

decision procedure for continuous response (Zhou et al. 2006)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 85

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Example 2: Phase I cancer trials

Seamless phase I/II designs:

phase I study “with a phase II flavour" (O’Quigley et al. 2001)

model toxicity and efficacy together

identify the most successful dose (MSD) rather than MTD

efficient (patient population of interest in phase I)

various methods using different models and stopping rules:

efficacy-toxicity trade-off (Thall & Russell 1998, Thall & Cook 2004)

CRM-like (O’Quigley et al. 2001, Zohar & O’Quigley 2006)

decision procedure for continuous response (Zhou et al. 2006)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 86

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Example 2: Phase I cancer trials

Seamless phase I/II designs:

phase I study “with a phase II flavour" (O’Quigley et al. 2001)

model toxicity and efficacy together

identify the most successful dose (MSD) rather than MTD

efficient (patient population of interest in phase I)

various methods using different models and stopping rules:

efficacy-toxicity trade-off (Thall & Russell 1998, Thall & Cook 2004)

CRM-like (O’Quigley et al. 2001, Zohar & O’Quigley 2006)

decision procedure for continuous response (Zhou et al. 2006)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 87

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Example 2: Phase I cancer trials

Seamless phase I/II designs:

phase I study “with a phase II flavour" (O’Quigley et al. 2001)

model toxicity and efficacy together

identify the most successful dose (MSD) rather than MTD

efficient (patient population of interest in phase I)

various methods using different models and stopping rules:

efficacy-toxicity trade-off (Thall & Russell 1998, Thall & Cook 2004)

CRM-like (O’Quigley et al. 2001, Zohar & O’Quigley 2006)

decision procedure for continuous response (Zhou et al. 2006)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 88

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Example 2: Phase I cancer trials

Seamless phase I/II designs:

phase I study “with a phase II flavour" (O’Quigley et al. 2001)

model toxicity and efficacy together

identify the most successful dose (MSD) rather than MTD

efficient (patient population of interest in phase I)

various methods using different models and stopping rules:efficacy-toxicity trade-off (Thall & Russell 1998, Thall & Cook 2004)

CRM-like (O’Quigley et al. 2001, Zohar & O’Quigley 2006)

decision procedure for continuous response (Zhou et al. 2006)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 89

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Example 2: Phase I cancer trials

Seamless phase I/II designs:

phase I study “with a phase II flavour" (O’Quigley et al. 2001)

model toxicity and efficacy together

identify the most successful dose (MSD) rather than MTD

efficient (patient population of interest in phase I)

various methods using different models and stopping rules:efficacy-toxicity trade-off (Thall & Russell 1998, Thall & Cook 2004)

CRM-like (O’Quigley et al. 2001, Zohar & O’Quigley 2006)

decision procedure for continuous response (Zhou et al. 2006)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 90

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Example 2: Phase I cancer trials

Seamless phase I/II designs:

phase I study “with a phase II flavour" (O’Quigley et al. 2001)

model toxicity and efficacy together

identify the most successful dose (MSD) rather than MTD

efficient (patient population of interest in phase I)

various methods using different models and stopping rules:efficacy-toxicity trade-off (Thall & Russell 1998, Thall & Cook 2004)

CRM-like (O’Quigley et al. 2001, Zohar & O’Quigley 2006)

decision procedure for continuous response (Zhou et al. 2006)

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 91

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Example 3: Multi-arm multi-stage trials (MAMS)TAILoR trial (Pushpakom et al. 2015)

Phase II study to evaluate treatment for side effect of HIVtri-regimen treatment (TAILoR)

Superiority trial

Several possible doses

Normal distributed endpoint

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 92

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

Example 3: Multi-arm multi-stage trials (MAMS)Design (Magirr et al, 2012)

3 active arms compared to control

Equal randomization between actives and control

one interim analysis

Stop for superiortiyStop if no active arm appears promisingDrop any active arms that are not sufficiently promising

In the trial we underestimated drop-out and could adjust atinterim

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 93

MotivationAdaptive Designs

Examples

General considerations

New methods either get results faster or are more accurate

Tend to take more time to develop upfront

How can this cost be covered?

Are the ideas sensible to implement?

Is an interim analysis feasible?Can Bayesian methods be updated online?

c© MPS Research Unit Adaptive trials 94