RDICRESEARCH DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATION CENTER
O U R L A D Y O F F A T I M A U N I V E R S I T Y
8
STUDENT ORIENTATION
Friday, July 26, 13
RDICRESEARCH DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATION CENTER
O U R L A D Y O F F A T I M A U N I V E R S I T Y
8
SERVICE.
STYLE.
RESPONSIBILITY.
Friday, July 26, 13
RDICRESEARCH DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATION CENTER
O U R L A D Y O F F A T I M A U N I V E R S I T Y
8rdic personnel, research office achievements, university role
undergraduate research format
services, proposal and final defense
SERVICE.
STYLE.
RESPONSIBILITY.
Friday, July 26, 13
DIRECTOR
AST. DIRECTOR
CAMPUS COOR.
ETHICAL BOARD
CLUSTER 1 CLUSTER 2 CLUSTER 3 CLUSTER 4
RDIC ORGANIZATION
Friday, July 26, 13
DIRECTOR
AST. DIRECTOR
CAMPUS COOR.
ETHICAL BOARD
CLUSTER 1 CLUSTER 2 CLUSTER 3 CLUSTER 4
COLLEGE REP. COLLEGE REP. COLLEGE REP. COLLEGE REP.
RDIC ORGANIZATION
Friday, July 26, 13
DIRECTOR
AST. DIRECTOR
CAMPUS COOR.
ETHICAL BOARD
CLUSTER 1 CLUSTER 2 CLUSTER 3 CLUSTER 4
COLLEGE REP. COLLEGE REP. COLLEGE REP. COLLEGE REP.
research analytics
research consultants
english dept.
research publication
RDIC ORGANIZATION
Friday, July 26, 13
DIRECTOR
AST. DIRECTOR
CAMPUS COOR.
ETHICAL BOARD
CLUSTER 1 CLUSTER 2 CLUSTER 3 CLUSTER 4
COLLEGE REP. COLLEGE REP. COLLEGE REP. COLLEGE REP.
FACULTY
research analytics
research consultants
english dept.
research publication
RDIC ORGANIZATION
Friday, July 26, 13
DIRECTOR
AST. DIRECTOR
CAMPUS COOR.
ETHICAL BOARD
CLUSTER 1 CLUSTER 2 CLUSTER 3 CLUSTER 4
COLLEGE REP. COLLEGE REP. COLLEGE REP. COLLEGE REP.
FACULTY
STUDENTS
research analytics
research consultants
english dept.
research publication
RDIC ORGANIZATION
Friday, July 26, 13
6
CLUSTER 1 CLUSTER 2
CLUSTER 1 CLUSTER 2 CLUSTER 3 CLUSTER 4
CLUSTER 3 CLUSTER 4
The RDIC follows cluster-based (per college)
research management
RESEARCH CLUSTERS
Friday, July 26, 13
6
CLUSTER 1Health & Medicine
CLUSTER 2Education & Society
CLUSTER 1 CLUSTER 2 CLUSTER 3 CLUSTER 4
CLUSTER 3Business & IT
CLUSTER 4Graduate School
The RDIC follows cluster-based (per college)
research management
RESEARCH CLUSTERS
Friday, July 26, 13
7
Health & Medicine
Education & Society
CLUSTER 1
CLUSTER 2
CLUSTER 3
Business & IT
medicine.dentistry.nursing.medtech. pharmacy. physical therapy. biology
education. psychology.criminology. philosophy. physical educ. cas
business. accountancy. chim. comp-sci. technology. maritime
RESEARCH CLUSTERS
Friday, July 26, 13
RDIC PUBLICATIONS
Book of Abstracts Fatima University Research Journal The OLFU Review
Friday, July 26, 13
RDIC PRESENTATIONS (1st SEM)
BS Pharma: 4 Papers23rd Pharmacy CongressSingapore, August 2013
Nursing: 3 PapersAsian Conference on educationJapan, October 2013
RDIC: 2 PaperAsian Conference on S.E.TJapan, October 2013
RDIC: 1 PaperHIMSS AsiaPac Health ITSingapore, October 2013
Friday, July 26, 13
RDICRESEARCH DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATION CENTER
O U R L A D Y O F F A T I M A U N I V E R S I T Y
8INFINITY SYMBOL(research)
PLANT ICON(development)
GLOBE(innovation)
LAUREL LEAF(scholarship)
RDIC LOGO
Friday, July 26, 13
I THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND
Introduction
Statement of the Problem
Hypothesis of the Study
Significance of the Study
Scope and Limitation of the Study
II REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES
Review of Related Literature and Studies
Conceptual Framework
Research Paradigm
Definition of Terms
III METHODOLOGY
Research Design
Locale and Population of the Study
Description of the Respondents
Data Gathering, Instrumentation and
Procedures
Statistical Treatment Used
IV PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA
V SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
Summary
Findings
Conclusions
Recommendations
TRADITIONAL RESEARCH FORMAT
Friday, July 26, 13
PUBLICATION FORMAT
International Format
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Background 2.1Theoretical Framework/CF 2.2 Review of Literature 2.3 Simulacrum3.0 Method 3.1 Subjects 3.2 Tools/ Measures 3.3 Analysis
4.0 Results5.0 Discussion
6.0 Conclusion
I-M-R-A-DFORMAT
Friday, July 26, 13
PRELIMINARY PAGES
CONTENT PAGES
REFERENCES, APPENDICES
RESEARCH MANUSCRIPT
(numbered as i, ii, iii, iv)
(numbered as 1, 2, 3, 4) (continue
numbering from previous)(with header/
footer)Friday, July 26, 13
FONT AND SPACING GUIDELINES
TIMES NEW ROMAN SIZE 11All ‘regular’ except titles (BOLD), subtitle Italics, footer (CAPS)
1.5 SPACINGall areas, except appendices and table contents (single)
LETTER SIZEPaper, Header and Footer for content pages only; justified
2.5 cm
2.5 cm
2.5 cm
3.0 cm
Friday, July 26, 13
HEADER AND FOOTER
first 5 words of
title...
page number
OUR LADY OF FATIMA
UNIVERSITY COLLEGEFriday, July 26, 13
SPACING BETWEEN PARAGRAPHS3 SPACES between paragraphs and titles (or 1 keyboard enter)
3 spaces3 spaces
3 spaces
Title: BoldSubTitle: Italics
justified; table with indent
Friday, July 26, 13
PRELIMINARY PAGES
RESEARCH MANUSCRIPT - PRELIMINARIES
FIRST TITLE PAGE
CONTENTS PAGE
ENDORSEMENT PAGECERTIFICATE OF ORIGINALITY
Friday, July 26, 13
1.0 INTRODUCTION2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
2.1. Theoretical Framework
CONTENT PAGES
2.2. Literature Review2.3. Research Simulacrum
3.0 RESEARCH METHOD3.1. Research Design3.2. Research Locale3.3. Population and Sampling3.4. Research Ethics3.5. Research Instruments3.6. Data Collection3.7. Data Analysis
4.0 RESULT(S)5.0 DISCUSSION6.0 CONCLUSION7.0 RECOMMENDATION
RESEARCH ABSTRACTSECOND TITLE PAGE
RESEARCH MANUSCRIPT - CONTENT (QUANTI)
Friday, July 26, 13
1.0 INTRODUCTION2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
2.1. Theoretical Framework
CONTENT PAGES
2.2. Literature Review2.3. Research Simulacrum
3.0 RESEARCH METHOD3.1. Research Design3.2. Research Locale3.3. Population and Sampling3.4. Research Ethics3.5. Research Instruments3.6. Data Collection3.7. Data Analysis
4.0 RESULT(S)5.0 DISCUSSION6.0 CONCLUSION7.0 RECOMMENDATION
RESEARCH ABSTRACTSECOND TITLE PAGE
RESEARCH MANUSCRIPT - CONTENT (QUALI)
(omitted)
(Key Informat
Selection)
moderatum generalization
reflection
Friday, July 26, 13
REFERENCES, APPENDICES
REFERENCES
LIST OF APPENDICESLetters of Permission ConsentResearch Instrument(s)
Research Tally/ Interview TextResearch Plates
Research BudgetTimeline
Certifications/ EthicsCorrespondenceAuthorsAcknowledgement
SELECTED LITERATURE (MIN 10)
RESEARCH MANUSCRIPT - REF/APPENDICES
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Friday, July 26, 13
SAMPLE TEMPLATE CAN BE ACCESSED FROM YOUR RESEARCH COORDINATORS STARTING
AUGUST 1, 2013
Friday, July 26, 13
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: TITLE PAGE
6 spaces from top of pageTitle: boldAuthors + adviserCollegeRDICOLFU
superscripts on authors and affiliations
no header and footer for title page
Friday, July 26, 13
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: CONTENT
1.0 INTRODUCTION2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
2.1. Theoretical Framework2.2. Literature Review2.3. Research Simulacrum
3.0 RESEARCH METHOD3.1. Research Design3.2. Research Locale3.3. Population and Sampling3.4. Research Ethics3.5. Research Instruments3.6. Data Collection3.7. Data Analysis
4.0 RESULT(S)5.0 DISCUSSION6.0 CONCLUSION7.0 RECOMMENDATION
RESEARCH ABSTRACTRDIC requires a structured
abstract and allow a limited number of words, ranging from
150-250.
Abstracts must contain an (1) introductory statement that ends
with a specific aim or hypothesis, (2) methodology, (3) results and the (4) conclusion.
Friday, July 26, 13
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: ABSTRACT CONTENT
With the pending issues on malnutrition and healthy illiteracy, the focus has been turned towards the potentials share of the gaming industry in attaining the elusive health-for-all across developmental stages. This paper sought to determine the system usability of a researcher-made computer game for health and test the effect of player demographics to usability and usability to the player’s intention to participate in gaming. The results showed that majority of the respondents (n=30) agreed that the game handed to them was usable (x̄=5.40; SD=0.88) and that they would play the game at the soonest time possible (x̄=1.43; SD=0.68). Regression analysis showed that player demographics is not a determinant of the player’s perception of game usability (r=0.18; p=0.82), but usability has shown to have a significant effect of the player’s intention to play the game (r=0.67; p=0.00). This paper is meritorious in providing empirical evidence of the importance of usability testing before handing down games for health to the target consumers.
Friday, July 26, 13
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: ABSTRACT CONTENT
With the pending issues on malnutrition and healthy illiteracy, the focus has been turned towards the potentials share of the gaming industry in attaining the elusive health-for-all across developmental stages. This paper sought to determine the system usability of a researcher-made computer game for health and test the effect of player demographics to usability and usability to the player’s intention to participate in gaming. The results showed that majority of the respondents (n=30) agreed that the game handed to them was usable (x̄=5.40; SD=0.88) and that they would play the game at the soonest time possible (x̄=1.43; SD=0.68). Regression analysis showed that player demographics is not a determinant of the player’s perception of game usability (r=0.18; p=0.82), but usability has shown to have a significant effect of the player’s intention to play the game (r=0.67; p=0.00). This paper is meritorious in providing empirical evidence of the importance of usability testing before handing down games for health to the target consumers.
Abstracts must contain an (1) introductory statement that ends with a specific aim or hypothesis, (2) methodology, (3) results
and the (4) conclusion.
Friday, July 26, 13
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: INTRODUCTION
1.0 INTRODUCTION2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
2.1. Theoretical Framework2.2. Literature Review2.3. Research Simulacrum
3.0 RESEARCH METHOD3.1. Research Design3.2. Research Locale3.3. Population and Sampling3.4. Research Ethics3.5. Research Instruments3.6. Data Collection3.7. Data Analysis
4.0 RESULT(S)5.0 DISCUSSION6.0 CONCLUSION7.0 RECOMMENDATION
RESEARCH ABSTRACT The introduction should provide justification for the study by
identifying a niche area within the existing body of knowledge. It
must also identify specific aims or hypotheses that become the
focus of the described research.
Introduction should be brief and generally limited to three or four paragraphs, and should be used
to set the stage for the study. Friday, July 26, 13
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: INTRO CONTENT
header
footer
1.0 Introduction(in bold)
ParagraphsT-I-P-S
Trends, Issues, Problem, Sentence of
Problematizing
Friday, July 26, 13
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: REVLIT
1.0 INTRODUCTION2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
2.1. Theoretical Framework2.2. Literature Review2.3. Research Simulacrum
3.0 RESEARCH METHOD3.1. Research Design3.2. Research Locale3.3. Population and Sampling3.4. Research Ethics3.5. Research Instruments3.6. Data Collection3.7. Data Analysis
4.0 RESULT(S)5.0 DISCUSSION6.0 CONCLUSION7.0 RECOMMENDATION
RESEARCH ABSTRACT 2.1 Theoretical Framework in S-E-C format
2.2. Should be presented thematically with proper citation (APA style), ends with research question
and hypothesis
Research simulacrum is the research paradigm
(figure)Friday, July 26, 13
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: RESEARCH METHOD
1.0 INTRODUCTION2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
2.1. Theoretical Framework2.2. Literature Review2.3. Research Simulacrum
3.0 RESEARCH METHOD3.1. Research Design3.2. Research Locale3.3. Population and Sampling3.4. Research Ethics3.5. Research Instruments3.6. Data Collection3.7. Data Analysis
4.0 RESULT(S)5.0 DISCUSSION6.0 CONCLUSION7.0 RECOMMENDATION
RESEARCH ABSTRACT3.1 State the approach
and design and the reason(s) why it is the
most appropriate
3.2. Describe the setting for the study and why it
was chosen
Friday, July 26, 13
1.0 INTRODUCTION2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
2.1. Theoretical Framework2.2. Literature Review2.3. Research Simulacrum
3.0 RESEARCH METHOD3.1. Research Design3.2. Research Locale3.3. Population and Sampling3.4. Research Ethics3.5. Research Instruments3.6. Data Collection3.7. Data Analysis
4.0 RESULT(S)5.0 DISCUSSION6.0 CONCLUSION7.0 RECOMMENDATION
RESEARCH ABSTRACT3.3 Specify sampling used (inclusion/exclusion) and the number of subjects
recruited; for human samples describe briefly;
for animals refer to standards
3.2. Describe ethical considerations
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: RESEARCH METHOD
Friday, July 26, 13
1.0 INTRODUCTION2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
2.1. Theoretical Framework2.2. Literature Review2.3. Research Simulacrum
3.0 RESEARCH METHOD3.1. Research Design3.2. Research Locale3.3. Population and Sampling3.4. Research Ethics3.5. Research Instruments3.6. Data Collection3.7. Data Analysis
4.0 RESULT(S)5.0 DISCUSSION6.0 CONCLUSION7.0 RECOMMENDATION
RESEARCH ABSTRACT3.5 Discuss content/
sections of the instrument and credibility (eg
reliability and validity), pilot testing, or
adaptation/adoptation
3.6. Data collection in detail including protocol
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: RESEARCH METHOD
Friday, July 26, 13
1.0 INTRODUCTION2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
2.1. Theoretical Framework2.2. Literature Review2.3. Research Simulacrum
3.0 RESEARCH METHOD3.1. Research Design3.2. Research Locale3.3. Population and Sampling3.4. Research Ethics3.5. Research Instruments3.6. Data Collection3.7. Data Analysis
4.0 RESULT(S)5.0 DISCUSSION6.0 CONCLUSION7.0 RECOMMENDATION
RESEARCH ABSTRACT
3.7 Describe variables measured and how
measurement was made; include statistics/analysis done, software used and
validation techniques
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: RESEARCH METHOD
Friday, July 26, 13
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: RESULTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
2.1. Theoretical Framework2.2. Literature Review2.3. Research Simulacrum
3.0 RESEARCH METHOD3.1. Research Design3.2. Research Locale3.3. Population and Sampling3.4. Research Ethics3.5. Research Instruments3.6. Data Collection3.7. Data Analysis
4.0 RESULT(S)5.0 DISCUSSION6.0 CONCLUSION7.0 RECOMMENDATION
RESEARCH ABSTRACT
Section TitlePresent TableDescribe Table
Table
Friday, July 26, 13
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: RESULTS
Section TitlePresent TableDiscuss(dont present analysis and
implications here)
Friday, July 26, 13
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: DISCUSSION
1.0 INTRODUCTION2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
2.1. Theoretical Framework2.2. Literature Review2.3. Research Simulacrum
3.0 RESEARCH METHOD3.1. Research Design3.2. Research Locale3.3. Population and Sampling3.4. Research Ethics3.5. Research Instruments3.6. Data Collection3.7. Data Analysis
4.0 RESULT(S)5.0 DISCUSSION6.0 CONCLUSION7.0 RECOMMENDATION
RESEARCH ABSTRACT
For every section:(1) 1 sentence summary
of result, (2) possible reasons for the result
(cross ref or not), and (3) implication of the finding
with reference to previous literature
Friday, July 26, 13
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: CONCLUSION
1.0 INTRODUCTION2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
2.1. Theoretical Framework2.2. Literature Review2.3. Research Simulacrum
3.0 RESEARCH METHOD3.1. Research Design3.2. Research Locale3.3. Population and Sampling3.4. Research Ethics3.5. Research Instruments3.6. Data Collection3.7. Data Analysis
4.0 RESULT(S)5.0 DISCUSSION6.0 CONCLUSION7.0 RECOMMENDATION
RESEARCH ABSTRACT1 sentence summary of
the paper objective
1-3 sentence(s) of method used
1-3 sentence summary of finding
implication to research, practice and education
Friday, July 26, 13
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: RECOMMENDATION
1.0 INTRODUCTION2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
2.1. Theoretical Framework2.2. Literature Review2.3. Research Simulacrum
3.0 RESEARCH METHOD3.1. Research Design3.2. Research Locale3.3. Population and Sampling3.4. Research Ethics3.5. Research Instruments3.6. Data Collection3.7. Data Analysis
4.0 RESULT(S)5.0 DISCUSSION6.0 CONCLUSION7.0 RECOMMENDATION
RESEARCH ABSTRACT
Discuss limitation of the paper and
recommendation to future researchers
Friday, July 26, 13
TO KNOW MORE ABOUT MINIMUM REQUIREMENT FOR EACH MANUSCRIPT SECTION, PLEASE VISIT JOURNAL
REPORTING STANDARDS (JARS) AT:
http://www.apa.org/pubs/authors/jars.pdf
Friday, July 26, 13
a course folder will appear along with your other courses
GUIDE ACCESS WILL START ON AUGUST 1, 2013
Friday, July 26, 13
COMPLETE YOUR PAPER WITHIN THE SEMESTER(NO EXTRA SEMESTER EXTENSION; NO GRADE OF INC)
Friday, July 26, 13
THROWBACK THURSDAY... COST OF MY PAPER
DEFENSE 1,200BIND (4) 600
STATISTICS 6,000ADVISER 400
PHP 8,200(6 in a group)
PHP 1,366
Friday, July 26, 13
DEFENSE/ PRESENTATION
DEFENSE/ PRESENTATION STUDENT FEES EXPENSES
PROPOSAL(for colleges with 2 semesters of
research subject)PHP 250/ STUDENTPHP 250/ STUDENT
ADVISER FEE (300), PANEL FEE (600), ETHICS REVIEW (100),
ENERGY (250)
FINAL DEFENSE PHP 400/ STUDENTPHP 400/ STUDENTADVISER (300), PANEL (600),
ANALYSIS (500), ENERGY (200), RESEARCH (300), BINDING (500)
6 members per group.
pay thru accounting officeFriday, July 26, 13
STANDARD FEES FOR PROPOSAL AND FINAL DEFENSE
DEFENSE/ PRESENTATION
DEFENSE/ PRESENTATION STUDENT FEES EXPENSES
PROPOSAL(for colleges with 2 semesters of
research subject)PHP 250/ STUDENTPHP 250/ STUDENT
ADVISER FEE (300), PANEL FEE (600), ETHICS REVIEW (100),
ENERGY (250)
FINAL DEFENSE PHP 400/ STUDENTPHP 400/ STUDENTADVISER (300), PANEL (600),
ANALYSIS (500), ENERGY (200), RESEARCH (300), BINDING (500)
6 members per group.
pay thru accounting officeFriday, July 26, 13
NO TOKENS SHALL BE GIVEN TO ADVISERS AND PANEL MEMBERS ON PAPER COMPLETION/DEFENSE
Friday, July 26, 13
STATISTICAL PROCEDURE
STUDENT SUBMIT TO ADVISER
ADVISER SUBMIT TO
RDIC
RESULT ENDORSE TO
ADVISER
Friday, July 26, 13
DEFENSE PROCEDURE
STUDENT SUBMIT TO ADVISER
DEFENSE SUBMIT TO ADVISER
(form, 3 copies, receipt) (student comply with changes)
(2 copies, CD softcopy)
Friday, July 26, 13
MANUSCRIPT BINDING
Effects of Touch Therapy on Hospital Stress among Primiparous Patients in the Philippines
AbstractWith the pending issues on malnutrition and healthy illiteracy, the focus has been turned towards the potentials share of the gaming industry in attaining the elusive health-for-all across developmental stages. Game usability testing has yielded many positive effects for both the gaming company and the gamer, but is given little attention when it comes to games for health. This paper sought to determine the system usability of a researcher-made computer game for health and test the effect of player demographics to usability and usability to the player’s intention to participate in gaming. The results showed that majority of the respondents (n=30) agreed that the game handed to them was usable (x̄=5.40; SD=0.88) and that they would play the game at the soonest time possible (x̄=1.43; SD=0.68). Regression analysis showed that player demographics is not a determinant of the player’s perception of game usability (r=0.18; p=0.82), but usability has shown to have a significant effect of the player’s intention to play the game (r=0.67; p=0.00). This paper is meritorious in providing empirical evidence of the importance of usability testing before handing down games for health to the target consumers.
Keywords: Nutrition, Literacy, Preschool, Usability, Behavior Intention, Regression, Game Development
Juan dela Cruz, SN; Rosario dela Cruz, SN, Jenica Ana Rivero, RN, MAN
College of NursingResearch Development and Innovation CenterOur Lady of Fatima University
Friday, July 26, 13
Our Lady of Fatima University Research Exposition (OLFU-RX)Valenzuela City, Quezon City, Antipolo City
The Research Development and Innovation Center (RDIC) of the Our Lady of Fatima University recognizes the importance of research culture growth among the members of the university community through conceptualization of valuable research programs and events that will highlight and recognize scientific research products of faculty and students. In pursuant of this the, OLFU-RX was conceptualized that will serve as an annual research event of the research departments across programs and campuses starting AY 2013-2014.
RXLFUOUR LADY OF FATIMA UNIVERSITY
RESEARCH EXPOSITION 2013
Friday, July 26, 13
RXLFUOUR LADY OF FATIMA UNIVERSITY
RESEARCH EXPOSITION 2013
✓To expose the university community to a favorable and challenging avenue for research presentation centered on friendly competition and research camaraderie across colleges and campuses✓To express recognition and reward exemplary research work and efforts of
faculty and students towards attaining sustainable research productivity and excellence✓To expound a culture of research by engaging the community in series of
worthy research activities and education sessions concurrent with the needs of the research society and responsive to the challenges brought by the dynamic research field✓To exhilarate the university community on the reward and benefits of
productive research work towards creation of scholar and honor societies of researchers
Friday, July 26, 13
RXLFUOUR LADY OF FATIMA UNIVERSITY
RESEARCH EXPOSITION 2013
“Translating Research towards Innovative and Sustainable Practice”
Higher educational institutions must respond to the ever-changing needs of the industry by serving as the primordial proponent of knowledge production and refinement through research and scholarly work. By utilization of research products, innovation and sustainability are ensured.
The following are the thematic strands for the research clusters of the RDIC:
✓Cluster 1 - Health and Medicine: “Sustainable Healthcare through Evidence-Based Practice”✓Cluster 2 - Education and Society: “Exploring Best Practices in Social Sciences”✓Cluster 3 - Business&IT: “Informatics-driven Practice: Catalyst for Transformational Change”
Friday, July 26, 13
CERTIFICATES WILL BE GIVEN TO ALL STUDENT PARTICIPANTS
special label at your binded manuscript
Friday, July 26, 13
RXLFUOUR LADY OF FATIMA UNIVERSITY
RESEARCH EXPOSITION 2013
Oral, AV, Poster Presentations
Best College ResearchBest Cluster ResearchRicierca Award of Excellence
Best Faculty Research
Innovation/Product Award
Friday, July 26, 13
DATE TIMEACTIVITIES PER CAMPUSACTIVITIES PER CAMPUSACTIVITIES PER CAMPUS
DATE TIMEValenzuela Campus QC Campus Antipolo Campus
Day 1 September 24
10:00 - 12:00Opening Ceremonies Opening Ceremonies Opening Ceremonies
1:00 - 3:00 Education Session 1Updates: Quali Research Poster Viewing and
Ribbon Cutting Session for Cluster 1
Poster Viewing and Ribbon Cutting Session for Cluster 2 and 33:00 - 5:00 Education Session 2
Multidisciplinary Research
Poster Viewing and Ribbon Cutting Session for Cluster 1
Poster Viewing and Ribbon Cutting Session for Cluster 2 and 3
Day 2September 25
9:00 - 12:00 Oral Presentation Cluster 1 Day 2September 25
9:00 - 12:00
Research Product and Innovation Presentation for Cluster 1
1:00 - 4:00 Research Product and Innovation Presentation for Cluster 1
Day 3September 26
9:00 - 12:00 Oral Presentation for Cluster 2 and 3
1:00 - 4:00 Research Product and Innovation Presentation for Cluster 2 and 3
Day 4September 27
8:00 - 9:00 Poster Viewing and Ribbon Cutting Session for Winning Entries from Clusters 1-3
9:00 - 12:00 Audio-Video Research Presentation
6:00 - 9:00 Researchers’ Night and Award CeremoniesLaunching of FURJ issue 5Launching of eJournalsInduction ceremony for Ethics Board and Research Council
Friday, July 26, 13
OLFU-RX Call for PapersFor Poster Presentation. The size of the poster must be 18x24 inches (portrait) with content font size of no less than 16. It must be printed in cintra or sticker material posted on board.
For Oral Presentation. Accepted presentation files are MS Powerpoint, iWork Keynote and Prezi. Pictures should not be less than 96 dpi.
For AudioVideo Presentation. AV presentations can be static (picture and text-based) or dynamic (video-based). The entry should contain clear audio and video, and not exceeding 10 minutes in duration.
ENTRY SUBMISSION:July 30 to September 6, 2013
(online)
Friday, July 26, 13