Thames Tideway Tunnel The Point 37 North Wharf Road Paddington, London W2 1AF
Tel: Fax: Web:
020 3147 7700 020 3147 7701 www.thamestidewaytunnel.co.uk
Registered in England and Wales No. 2366661 Registered office: Clearwater Court, Vastern Road Reading, Berkshire, RG1 8DB
The Planning Inspectorate
3/18 Eagle Way Temple Quay House 2 The Square BRISTOL BS1 6PN
Your ref Our ref Name Phone Email
WW010001 DCO-DT-APP-ZZ100-970000 Phil Stride +44 (0)20 3147 7700 [email protected]
FAO Mark Wilson (Principal Case Manager) 11 March 2014 Dear Sirs PLANNING ACT 2008 THAMES WATER UTILITIES LIMITED APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT CONSENT FOR THE THAMES TIDEWAY TUNNEL
1 Purpose of this letter
1.1.1 As requested by the Examining Authority (ExA) for the 11 March 2014 deadline, we enclose our final written responses. Our submission comprises:
our responses to representations from stakeholders submitted for 3 March 2014 a.deadline
an updated version of the Guide to the Application b.
errata for our 3 March 2014 submission c.
revised Section 127 and Section 138 schedules d.
updated application documents following a further consistency check e.
an update on legal agreements f.
an update on matters progressed and yet to be resolved. g.
1.1.2 A list of documents enclosed as part of this submission is set out at Schedule 1.
2 Our responses to representation from stakeholders
2.1.1 Representations were submitted by a range of third parties for the 3 March 2014 deadline. We have reviewed these responses and, in many cases, they do not raise new points and/or matters which materially affect the examination of the application. Our responses, contained at APP198, therefore focus on submissions which do raise new points and/or matters which materially affect the examination of the application.
Page 2
3 Guide to the Application
3.1.1 We enclose an updated version of the Guide to the Application at APP199. We have sought to update the guide to include all of the documents submitted during the examination, including those forming part of our 11 March 2014 submission. This updated document has been prepared in parallel with the other documents in today’s submission. The long lead in time for desktop publishing the guide means that there may be some minor discrepancies between what we enclose as part of our 11 March 2014 submission and the guide. The definitive list of what we have submitted today is contained at Schedule 1 to this letter.
3.1.2 The updated Guide to the Application comprises three parts:
Part 1 contains a list of our application documents submitted in February 2013; a.where appropriate, it also indicates where revised versions of drawings, plans and documents have been submitted during the examination of the application.
Part 2 identifies the documents submitted during the examination. It also identifies b.the documents where we have provided updates and/or revised versions during the examination.
Part 3 provides a description of each submitted document. With the exception of c.documents forming part of today’s submission, where possible, the document titles are also hyperlinked to the relevant document on the Planning Inspectorate’s website. It also contains a document index, which details the box and/or folder reference for each document submitted in hard copy.
4 Errata and clarifications
4.1.1 Following a further review of documents forming our 3 March 2014 submission, we have identified a number of errata to the Book of Reference. These are enclosed at APP200.
4.1.2 We also enclose, at APP206, a slightly amended version of the Design Principles. Following further discussions with the Environment Agency, we have agreed to amend para. 3.6.1, in order to clarify the meaning of the sentence. This clarification has been made in direct response to comments from the Environment Agency in its 3 March 2014 submission. We enclose three documents relating to the Design Principles:
a ‘clean’ final version which incorporates the clarification a.
a ‘comparite’ which shows the clarification made against the version issued on b.3 March 2014; we only include the page where the amendment has been made
a ‘comparite’ which shows the clarification made against the submission version c.issued on 28 February 2013; we only include the page where the amendment has been made.
5 Section 127 and Section 138 schedules
5.1.1 We enclose, at APP201 and APP202, updated Section 127 and Section 128 schedules. The schedules have been updated to accommodate the following amendments:
Errata resulting from further information that has been supplied by stakeholders; a.this includes interests not falling within the definition of Section 127 or Section 138 of the Planning Act 2008.
Page 3
Submissions made to the ExA confirming that representations have been b.withdrawn. Where this is the case in the Section 127 Schedule, the relevant plots have been removed. For the Section 138 Schedule, we have noted against the relevant plots that a withdrawal has been made. One withdrawal was submitted too late for the schedules to note this. This is a withdrawal made on 10 March 2014 by the Port of London Authority (PLA) and we would therefore ask the ExA to note that the PLA plots shown on the schedules no longer require certification under Section 127 or consent by the Secretary of State for Transport under Section 138.
5.1.2 The letter of partial withdrawal of representations from Network Rail of 7 March 2014 states clearly that Network Rail’s objection in respect of the applications for certification are withdrawn. However, Sections 127 and 138 of the Planning Act 2008 refer to the withdrawal of representations rather than withdrawal of objections. The schedules for the Section 127 application submitted for 11 March 2014(APP201) omit the Network Rail plots and, for Section 138 (APP202), note that Network Rail has withdrawn. In the event that the ExA considers that Network Rail has not withdrawn its representation for these purposes, it is asked to include in its determination for Section 127 certification for Network Rail its interests as noted against plots 42,43 and 53 (City of London), 32 (City of Westminster), 179 (London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham), 187, 190, 192, 199 and 200 (London Borough of Lewisham), 15 (London Borough of Newham), 4 (London Borough of Southwark), 67,68,69,70,72,230 (London Borough of Wandsworth) and 8, 9, 10, 11 12, 13, 18a (Royal Borough of Greenwich). These were all listed in the submission of S127 schedules for 3 March 2014 (APP193). For Section 138, Network Rail’s interests are listed in the 11 March 2014 submission but if the ExA considers the representation not to have been withdrawn, can these please be considered for consent under Section 138 (4) (b).
5.1.3 Copies of the updated schedules have also been submitted to the relevant Secretaries of State.
6 Application document consistency check
6.1 Overview
6.1.1 In our 3 March 2014 cover letter, we noted that in some of the recently updated documents, issues remained regarding internal consistency. We have further reviewed the documents submitted for the 3 March 2014 deadline and enclose updated versions of the following documents:
Mitigation Route Map (APP203) a.
draft final DCO (APP204) b.
Code of Construction Practice (CoCP) Part A: General Requirements (APP205) c.
River Transport Strategy (APP207) d.
Environmental Statement Update Report (APP208) e.
Non-statutory Off-site Mitigation and Compensation Policy (APP210) f.
Exceptional Hardship Procedure (APP213). g.
6.1.2 As stated in our cover letter dated 3 March 2014, these documents have only been updated to ensure they are internally consistent and the updates do not materially change the meaning of the documents, or contain material changes in our approach to issues or introduce new polices. Where the amendments contained within the
Page 4
documents go beyond updates to cross-references, etc, a description of the changes made is provided in the subsections below.
6.1.3 ‘Comparites’ are enclosed for each of the documents listed above to show the changes between the different versions of the documents. ‘Comparites’ against the 3 March 2014 versions are enclosed for all the documents listed above. Where appropriate, we also enclose ‘comparites’ against the 28 February 2013 version.
6.2 Code of Construction Practice
6.2.1 An updated version of the CoCP has been submitted rather than issuing errata for the two amendments that have been identified. A mistake was made during the editing process, which resulted in the document title changing from Code of Construction Practice, Part A: General Requirements to Code of Construction Practice, Part A: General controls, which is how it appeared in the February and March 2014 versions (APP104, APP125 and APP178). The document enclosed at APP205 returns the CoCP to its original title. Although a minor error, this erratum was apparent on the title page, page i, and in the footer of every page of the document. We therefore considered it was more appropriate to update and resubmit the CoCP than provide sheets of errata.
6.2.2 We also identified an erratum in relation to underwater noise and vibration. Text at para. 6.4.7a was removed from the February 2014 versions of the document (APP104 and APP125), but reinstated in the 3 March 2014 version (APP178). The reinstatement should have been carried out with a slight clarification to ensure that an incorrect assumption could not be implied. In APP178, para. 6.4.7a stated: “avoiding piling at night to ensure windows of no disturbance within each 24-hour period”. In the final enclosed version, para. 6.4.7a now states: “piling shall only occur during standard working hours. Avoiding piling at night also ensures windows of no disturbance within each 24-hour period”. We do not believe that this amendment constitutes a material change since the amendment has been made in the interest of clarity and to give reassurance that, although respite periods for fish will occur during the evening and night, it is not our intention to pile outside of standard working hours.
6.3 Environmental Statement Update Report
6.3.1 The Environmental Statement Update Report has been submitted in updated form at APP208 to incorporate two main changes.
6.3.2 We have made corrections to ensure that the cross-references in the update report are consistent with the draft final DCO, including amended Requirements, which is also resubmitted (at APP204).
6.3.3 It has also come to our attention that the summary assessment tables, contained in the appendices to the update report submitted for the 3 March 2014 deadline (APP184), were edited incorrectly. As a result, the changes made to the assessment tables were not shown in ‘tracked changes’. This formatting anomaly has been resolved and the summary tables, enclosed at APP208.01.01 and APP208.01.07 onwards, are now correct.
6.4 Book of Reference
6.4.1 The entire Book of Reference was republished for the 3 March 2014 submission (APP138.01 to APP138.15). Since then, a number of statutory undertakers have supplied additional information about their assets and property. In addition, we have
Page 5
received further information regarding interests held by government departments at Albert Embankment Foreshore. These plots were always identified as Crown land but the identity of the government department which owns them has now been clarified. These are captured in the errata at APP200 and have also informed the revised section 127/138 tables.
7 Update on legal agreements
7.1 Legal agreement with the river regulators
7.1.1 In our cover letter dated 3 March 2014, we indicated that we would submit a completed legal agreement between Thames Water, the Port of London Authority, the Environment Agency and the Marine Management Organisation on either 3 March 2014 or 11 March 2014. A copy of the completed legal agreement was submitted under separate cover on 3 March 2014 (APP183).
7.2 Legal agreement for securing off-site mitigation policies and resources for local planning authorities
7.2.1 We enclose, at APP209.03, the final form legal agreement and associated Section 106 unilateral undertaking between Thames Water and the 15 local planning authorities (the LPAs). This deed seeks to ensure our compliance with the policies for securing off-site mitigation and compensation relating to the project. The covering note at APP209.01 summarises the background and arrangement of the deed, and APP209.02 sets out how we sought agreement with the LPAs and lists those LPAs which provided detailed comments on the draft deeds.
7.2.2 We further enclose, at APP209.06, copies of the letter dated 10 March 2014 sent to the councils which accompanied engrossments of the legal agreement and requested confirmation from the LPAs of their ability and/or willingness to sign the deed against a proposed deadline of 24 March 2014. Where any LPA confirms it is unwilling or unable to sign the legal agreement, the letter confirms our undertaking that we will observe the terms of the legal agreement as if all LPAs were a signatory party.
7.2.3 Once each of the LPAs willing to sign the legal agreement returns the executed agreement to us, we will proceed to execute the agreement and complete it on a date that will be confirmed to the LPAs. Those LPAs which do not wish, or are not able to enter into the legal agreement will have the benefit of the undertaking referred to in paragraph 7.2.2 above. Upon the grant of development consent, we will proceed to execute the Section 106 unilateral undertaking as provided for in the legal agreement.
7.2.4 We are aware that the London Borough of Ealing emailed the Planning Inspectorate on 10 March 2014 (see email to [email protected] from Neil Bleakley at the London Borough of Ealing at 13:52) explaining why it would not be completing the legal agreement. It included with that submission earlier correspondence between our solicitors, Berwin Leighton Paisner LLP, and the borough. In that correspondence, Berwin Leighton Paisner explains why we have offered the legal agreement to the LPAs, including reference to the extensive discussions on the issue of noise mitigation that have taken place at issue specific hearings.
7.2.5 We are disappointed that the London Borough of Ealing has responded in the manner it has. We note that the council has no authority to enter the agreement at this time, but do not accept that the reasons given in the three bullet points represent insurmountable reasons not to enter the legal agreement. In that respect, APP209.01
Page 6
explains how the agreement and subsequently the Section 106 unilateral undertaking secure the off-site mitigation policies and resources for the LPAs. These proposals have been discussed with the ExA and the LPAs which attended the relevant issue specific hearings. There is a general acceptance that the off-site mitigation policies and the proposals regarding local authority resourcing need to be secured, and neither the ExA nor any of the LPAs attending the issue specific hearings has raised any objection or concern as to the principle of our approach.
7.2.6 Of course the London Borough of Ealing will benefit from the undertaking referred to in paragraph 7.2.2 and, if the development consent is granted, it will be in receipt of the completed Section 106 unilateral undertaking. Notwithstanding its comment that the legal agreement and unilateral undertaking protect individual property interests, we believe it is reasonable to secure these protections by way of Section 106 obligation, not least given the views expressed forcibly by other LPAs that they must have some way of protecting the communities they represent; a point we understand to be of importance to the ExA also. We believe that the legal agreement and unilateral undertaking is an appropriate, proportionate and lawful response to the issues raised.
8 Update on matters progressed and yet to be resolved
8.1.1 In our cover letter for the 3 March 2014 submission, we indicated that we would provide an update as part of our 11 March 2014 submission on how matters identified as not yet resolved have progressed in the intervening period. This update is provided at Schedule 2. Where appropriate, a hyperlink is provided to referenced letters and/or agreements.
9 Other matters
9.1 National Planning Policy Noise Guidance
9.1.1 This was formally published by the Department of Communities and Local Government on 6 March 2014. As it is in the public domain and the beta version of the National Planning Policy Guidance (NPPG) has been the subject of many questions from, and submissions to, the ExA during the examination period, we hope it is of assistance to confirm the following:
The published version of the NPPG is materially the same as the beta version a.
It now explicitly references government noise policy (the Noise Policy Statement for b.England 2010(NPSE)); and
It now explicitly references the National Policy Statement (NPS) for Waste Water. c.
9.1.2 It is therefore clear that the Government regards the NPS noise policy as being consistent with and part of national noise policy. Just as with the latest draft NPS for National Networks (which contains the same words as paragraph 4.9.9 of the Waste Water NPS and directly references the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), the NPSE and the NPPG), no different policy is proposed.
9.1.3 There are two technical points where the published guidance has been modified compared to the beta version that are relevant to the project. Both of these clarifications relate to the table that summarises the noise exposure hierarchy. Neither affects our interpretation of policy.
Page 7
9.1.4 For observed adverse effects, the published table clarifies that these effects give rise to the “potential for some reported sleep disturbance”. This importantly differs from ‘non-awakening’ sleep disturbance, as noted in the table of the beta version. The change clarifies that objectively measured sleep disturbance due to noise does not generally occur until a significant observed adverse effect level is reached. As noted in our oral submissions to the noise hearings, 'reported' sleep disturbance relates to self-reported disturbance where people believe they have been disturbed but objective measures show that they have not been disturbed. This occurs because people generally wake up many times a night for different reasons (eg, anxiety, needing to go to the toilet, etc) and on hearing a noise can mistakenly believe it is the noise that woke them. A significant observed adverse effect level for sleep disturbance needs to reflect objectively observed sleep disturbance, as set out in our submissions (APP157, Section 5.2). The distinction between reported and objective sleep disturbance therefore needs to be borne carefully in mind when considering guidance such as that provided by the World Health Organization when setting a significant observed adverse effect level (SOAEL).
9.1.5 For significant observed adverse effects, the published table clarifies that these effects relate to “where there is no alternative ventilation, having to keep windows closed most of the time because of the noise”. The text underlined has been added since the beta version. Examples of alternative ventilation would be either ventilation to a room from another window on a quiet façade of the property, or the provision of additional mechanical or other attenuated ventilation equivalent to an open window. This is the form of additional ventilation provided by the noise insulation package proposed by the project and reinforces our submissions that noise insulation trigger levels proposed by the project align with the relevant significant observed adverse effect level for day, evening or night (APP157, Section 3.2 and Appendix A).
9.1.6 The NPPG clarification confirms that:
a significant observed adverse effect does not necessarily occur when windows a.facing the noise have to be closed most of the time if the same room has access to a window to a quiet façade (the outcome will depend on the sound insulation provided by the closed window); and
once noise insulation, which includes alternative ventilation, is provided then the b.significant observed adverse effect is avoided.
9.1.7 The published guidance therefore confirms our submissions to the ExA on NPS noise policy (APP102.03, Appendix B, and APP157, Appendix A), the key matters being:
NPPG guides how the aims at NPS paragraph 4.9.9 should be interpreted. a.
The first aim relates to ‘significant observed adverse effects’ as defined by NPPG b.and NPSE (and not to any other definition of significant effect in the Environmental Statement (ES).
SOAELs are aligned with the trigger values for noise insulation (or other equivalent c.off-site mitigation).
Where on-site mitigation is exhausted, the provision of noise insulation avoids any d.residual significant observed adverse effects and, therefore, the first aim of NPS noise policy is met.
The second aim relates to ‘observed adverse effects’ and these occur when the e.noise exposure is between the lowest observed adverse effect level (LOAEL) and the SOAEL.
Page 8
Observed adverse effects have been assessed in the ES (against the A and B f.thresholds of the BS5228-1 ABC method) and, taking account of noise level, duration and number of dwellings affected, can be reported as a significant effect in the ES. These observed adverse effects primarily relate to change in the acoustic character of the area and do not cause ‘material change in behaviour and/or attitude’.
The Environmental Impact Assessment and Thames Water’s noise strategy has g.resulted in on-site mitigation being maximised. In maximising mitigation, the residual observed adverse effects are minimised and hence the second aim of NPS noise policy is met.
NPPG, like NPSE, is clear that avoiding significant observed adverse effects and h.minimising observed adverse effects (ie, the first and second aims of NPS noise policy) “must be made taking account of the economic and social benefit of the activity causing the noise”. In other words, there is a balance to be made and NPS noise policy should not therefore be applied in isolation.
Where residents elect to retain the off-site mitigation provided, it will reduce i.exposure to existing noise sources, thus improving their existing situation over the short and long term and meeting the third aim of NPS noise policy.
9.2 Delivery body
9.2.1 We wanted to draw attention to a couple of appointments we have made to the organisation which will eventually for, or be part of, the Infrastructure Provider (IP) which, as the ExA will be aware, will be the entity responsible for the delivery of the project.
9.2.2 In December 2013, we appointed Sir Neville Simms as Chairman. He is one the most experienced and distinguished figures in the UK infrastructure industry and will be a significant asset to the project when it enters the delivery phase.
9.2.3 In January 2014, we also appointed Andrew Mitchell as the Chief Executive Officer. Mr Mitchell is currently the Programme Director and Board Member at Crossrail and will report to Sir Neville Simms, and lead the development of the delivery company.
9.3 Secret Intelligence Services
9.3.1 At the hearing on 21 February 2014, the ExA expressed concern at the way that the project was referring to the Secret Intelligence Services.
9.3.2 The ExA has received confirmation that, following discussions with us, ‘Secret Intelligence Service’ (SIS) is the agreed terminology to be used within Schedule 3 of the draft final DCO. The ExA should note that the application documentation also includes references to “the occupiers of Vauxhall Cross” and “the occupiers of 85 Albert Embankment”.
10 Enclosed documents
10.1.1 As agreed, we enclose seven hard copies and eight DVDs containing the submitted material.
10.1.2 I trust you will find this information helpful. If any queries arise from the above, please do not hesitate to contact me or Ian Fletcher on 020 8792 5568 or [email protected].
Page 9
11 Conclusion
11.1.1 Finally, I would like to thank the Planning Inspectorate staff and, in particular, Mark Wilson, Chris White and Rob Ranger for their advice and the helpful way in which they addressed our many queries. I would appreciate it if you could convey my thanks to them.
Yours faithfully
Phil Stride Head of Thames Tideway Tunnel
Page 10
Schedule 1: Documents submitted for 11 March 2014 deadline
PINS Doc Ref
Document Title
Our responses to representations from stakeholders
APP198.02 Response to the Andrew Whetnall 3 March 2014 Submission
APP198.03 Response to the Ann Rosenberg on behalf of Carnwath Road Coalition 3 March 2014 Submission
APP198.04 Response to the Anthony Alexander Arhaq Housing 3 March 2014 Submission
APP198.05 Response to the Brian Chadwick 3 March 2014 Submission
APP198.06 Response to the British Telecommunication Plc 3 March 2014 Submission
APP198.07 Response to the City of London 3 March 2014 Submission
APP198.08 Response to the City of Westminster and Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission for England (HBMCE) 3 March 2014 submission
APP198.09 Response to the Cory Environmental Holdings Ltd 3 March 2014 Submission
APP198.10 Response to the Councillor Anood Al-Samerai 3 March 2014 submission
APP198.11 Response to the David Starkie 3 March 2014 Submission
APP198.12 Response to the Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission for England (HBMCE) 3 March 2014 submission
APP198.13 Response to the Environment Agency 3 March 2014 Submission
APP198.14 Response to Eversheds on behalf of Luna House 3 March 2014 submission
APP198.15 Response to the Free Trade Wharf 3 March 2014 Submission
APP198.16 Response to the Hermitage Community Moorings 3 March 2014 submission
APP198.18 Response to the Larry Broomhead of Wrayburn Residents Together 3 March 2014 Submission
APP198.19 Response to the Livetts Launches 3 March 2014 Submission
APP198.20 Response to the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham 3 March 2014 submission
APP198.21 Response to the London Borough of Lambeth 3 March 2014
APP198.22 Response to the London Borough of Lewisham 3 March 2014 Submission
APP198.23 Response to the London Borough of Newham 3 March 2014 Submission
APP198.24 Response to the London Borough of Southwark 3 March 2014 Submission
APP198.25 Response to the London Borough of Tower Hamlets 3 March 2014 Submission
APP198.26 Response to the London Borough of Wandsworth 3 March 2014 Submission
APP198.27 Response to the London Duck Tours 3 March 2014 Submission
APP198.28 Response to the Marc Hearn 3 March 2014 Submission
APP198.29 Response to the Margarette Lincoln 3 March 2014 submission
Page 11
PINS Doc Ref
Document Title
APP198.30 Response to the Marine Management Organisation 3 March 2014 Submission
APP198.31 Response to the Mark and Mary Hale on behalf of Nine Elms Piers Ltd 3 March 2014 Submission
APP198.32 Response to the Port of London Authority 3 March 2014 Submission
APP198.33 Response to the Roland Gilmore 3 March 2014 Submission
APP198.34 Response to the Save Your Riverside 3 March 2014 Submission
APP198.35 Response to the St George 3 March 2014 submission
APP198.36 Response to the St James Group 3 March 2014 Submission
APP198.37 Response to the Sue Lawes on behalf of Crossfields TRA 3 March 2014 submission
APP198.38 Response to the Surrey Quays 3 March 2014 Submission
APP198.39 Response to the Thamesbank 3 March 2014 Submission
APP198.40 Response to the Mercers Company and St Paul's School 3 March 2014 Submission
APP198.41 Response to the Transport for London 3 March 2014 Submission
Guide to the application
APP199 Guide to the Application
Errata and clarifications
APP200 Errata
APP206.01 Design Principles – 11 March 2014
APP206.02 Design Principles – Comparite against 3 March 2014 (extract)
APP206.03 Design Principles – Comparite against 28 February 2013 (extract)
Section 127 and Section 128 Schedules
APP201 Section 127 Schedule
APP202 Section 138 Schedule
Application document consistency check
APP203.01 Mitigation Route Map
APP203.02 Mitigation Route Map Comparite against 3 March 2014
APP204.01
Drafting notes for The Draft Thames Water Utilities Limited (Thames Tideway Tunnel) Development Consent Order
APP204.02
The Draft Thames Water Utilities Limited (Thames Tideway Tunnel) Development Consent Order – Revised 11 March 2014
APP204.03
The Draft Thames Water Utilities Limited (Thames Tideway Tunnel) Development Consent Order – Comparite against 3 March 2014
APP204.04 The Draft Thames Water Utilities Limited (Thames Tideway Tunnel) Development Consent Order – Comparite against 28 February 2013
Page 12
PINS Doc Ref
Document Title
APP205.01 Code of Construction Practice Part A: General Requirements – 11 March 2014
APP205.02 Code of Construction Practice Part A: General Requirements Comparite against 3 March 2014
APP207.01 Drafting notes for River Transport Strategy
APP207.02 River Transport Strategy – Update 11 March 2014
APP207.03 River Transport Strategy – Comparite to 3 March 2014
APP208.01 Environmental Statement Update Report 11 March 2014
APP208.02 Environmental Statement Update Report Comparite with 3 March 2014
APP208.01.01 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables – Project-wide
APP208.01.02 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Updated Environmental Statement Vol 3 Project Wide Effects Assessment Section 14: Water Resources – Surface Water
APP208.01.03 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Sediment Fluxes in the Tidal Thames
APP208.01.04 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Scour and Accretion Strategy – Temporary and Permanent Works
APP208.01.05 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary of Changes Between Environmental Statement and the Environmental Statement Update Report
APP208.01.06 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – The Treatment of Operational Derogations in the Environmental Statement
APP208.01.07 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Acton Storm Tanks
APP208.01.08 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Hammersmith Pumping Station
APP208.01.09 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Barn Elms
APP208.01.10 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Putney Embankment Foreshore
APP208.01.11 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Dormay Street
APP208.01.12 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: King George’s Park
APP208.01.13 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Carnwath Road Riverside
APP208.01.14 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Falconbrook Pumping Station
Page 13
PINS Doc Ref
Document Title
APP208.01.15 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Cremorne Wharf Depot
APP208.01.16 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Chelsea Embankment Foreshore
APP208.01.17 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Kirtling Street
APP208.01.18 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Heathwall Pumping Station
APP208.01.19 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Albert Embankment Foreshore
APP208.01.20 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Victoria Embankment Foreshore
APP208.01.21 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Visualisations – Victoria Embankment Foreshore
APP208.01.22 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Victoria Embankment Foreshore Vessel Relocation
APP208.01.23 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Blackfriars Bridge Foreshore
APP208.01.24 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Blackfriars Bridge Foreshore Vessel Relocations
APP208.01.25 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Shad Thames Pumping Station
APP208.01.26 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Chambers Wharf
APP208.01.27 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: King Edward Memorial Park
APP208.01.28 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Earl Pumping Station
APP208.01.29 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Deptford Church Street
APP208.01.30 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Greenwich Pumping Station
APP208.01.31 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Abbey Mills Pumping Station
APP208.01.32 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Beckton Sewage Treatment Works
APP208.01.33 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Minor Works Site
Page 14
PINS Doc Ref
Document Title
APP210.01 Non-statutory Off-site Mitigation and Compensation Policy
APP210.02 Non-statutory Off-site Mitigation and Compensation Policy Comparite against 3 March 2014
APP213.01 Exceptional Hardship Procedure Update 11 March 2014
APP213.02 Exceptional Hardship Procedure Comparite against 3 March 2014
Update on legal agreements
APP209.01 Legal Agreement and Section 106 Unilateral Undertaking – Covering Note
APP 209.02 Legal Agreement and Section 106 Unilateral Undertaking – Drafting Notes
APP209.03 Legal Agreement for Securing of Off-site Mitigation Policies and Resources for Local Planning Authorities
APP209.06 Letters to local planning authorities
Update on Statements of Common Ground and Position Statements
APP214.03 Position Statement Cannon Wharf
APP215.01 Update on Statement of Common Ground Transport for London
APP215.02 Update on Statement of Common Ground Port of London Authority
APP215.03 Update on Statement of Common Ground Environment Agency
APP215.04 Update on Statement of Common Ground British Telecommunications Plc
APP215.05 Update on Statement of Common Ground Cory Environmental
APP216 City of London Asset Protection Letter
Pag
e 1
5
Sch
ed
ule
2: U
pd
ate
on
mat
ters
pro
gres
sed
an
d y
et t
o b
e r
eso
lve
d
1.1
.1
Sch
edu
le 2
pro
vid
es a
n u
pd
ate
on
ho
w m
atte
rs i
den
tifi
ed a
s n
ot
yet
reso
lved
in
3 M
arch
20
14
co
ver
lett
er h
ave
pro
gres
sed
. I
n r
evie
win
g Sc
hed
ule
2, t
he
follo
win
g p
oin
ts s
ho
uld
be
no
ted
:
Th
e sc
hed
ule
co
nta
ins
up
dat
es, w
her
e ap
pro
pri
ate,
on
Sta
tem
ents
of
Co
mm
on
Gro
un
d (
SoC
G)
and
Po
siti
on
Sta
tem
ents
wit
h v
ario
us
a.p
arti
es.
W
her
e re
fere
nce
is m
ade
to t
he
dra
ft f
inal
DC
O in
th
e 3
Mar
ch 2
01
4 c
olu
mn
, th
is c
an f
ou
nd
at
AP
P1
77
.02
. b
. Th
e sc
hed
ule
has
bee
n u
pd
ated
to
incl
ud
e A
ffec
ted
Per
son
s. W
her
e m
atte
rs r
emai
n a
s d
ocu
men
ted
in o
ur
resp
on
se t
o q
ues
tio
n R
58
.2
c.(A
PP
168
), t
he
nam
ed p
arty
is n
ot
incl
ud
ed in
th
is s
ched
ule
exc
ept
wh
ere
the
ExA
sp
ecif
ical
ly r
eq
uir
ed in
form
atio
n a
t th
e fi
nal
ro
un
d o
f co
mp
uls
ory
acq
uis
itio
n h
eari
ngs
. W
her
e m
atte
rs h
ave
pro
gres
sed
sin
ce o
ur
sub
mis
sio
n f
or
the
3 M
arch
20
14
dea
dlin
e, A
ffec
ted
Per
son
s ar
e in
clu
ded
in t
he
sch
edu
le.
Wh
en r
ead
ing
en
trie
s re
lati
ng
to A
ffec
ted
Per
son
s, t
he
follo
win
g sh
ou
ld b
e n
ote
d.
The
stat
us
for
the
3 M
arch
2
014
co
lum
n is
bas
ed o
n o
ur
resp
on
ses
to q
ues
tio
n R
58
.2.
Wh
ere
an A
ffec
ted
Per
son
is a
lso
list
ed in
an
ear
lier
entr
y in
th
e sc
hed
ule
, th
ey
are
no
t re
pea
ted
in t
he
Aff
ecte
d P
erso
ns
sect
ion
of
the
sch
edu
le (
row
no
. 45
an
d b
elo
w).
No
. O
rgan
isat
ion
St
atu
s as
ref
lect
ed
in s
ub
mis
sio
ns
mad
e f
or
3 M
arch
20
14
d
ead
line
U
pd
ate
d s
tatu
s as
of
11
Mar
ch 2
01
4
Stat
uto
ry u
nd
erta
kers
an
d C
om
mu
nic
atio
n C
od
e P
rovi
de
rs
1
Tr
ansp
ort
fo
r Lo
nd
on
A
n u
nsi
gned
up
dat
e re
po
rt t
o t
he
SoC
G w
as s
ub
mit
ted
(D
oc
ref:
AP
P1
59.0
3).
A s
epar
ate
sign
ed P
osi
tio
n S
tate
men
t w
ith
an
agr
eed
set
of
pro
tect
ive
pro
visi
on
s w
as s
ub
mit
ted
by
Tran
spo
rt f
or
Lon
do
n o
n 3
Mar
ch 2
014
.
Wo
rk is
co
nti
nu
ing
bet
we
en t
he
par
ties
to
pro
gres
s th
e O
vera
rch
ing
Fram
ewo
rk A
gree
men
t.
The
Pro
per
ty H
ead
s o
f Te
rms
are
bei
ng
dis
cuss
ed b
etw
een
th
e p
arti
es.
Sign
ed u
pd
ate
re
po
rt t
o t
he
SoC
G (
Do
c re
f: A
PP
21
5.0
1)
con
tain
ed w
ith
in t
his
su
bm
issi
on
pro
vid
es a
su
mm
ary
of
agre
ed a
nd
ou
tsta
nd
ing
mat
ters
.
Dis
cuss
ion
s ar
e co
nti
nu
ing
to c
on
clu
de
the
Ove
rarc
hin
g Fr
amew
ork
Agr
eem
ent
and
Pro
per
ty H
ead
s o
f Te
rms.
Th
e p
arti
es a
gree
th
at t
hes
e sh
ou
ld b
e co
mp
lete
d in
th
e ve
ry n
ear
futu
re.
2
N
etw
ork
Rai
l In
terf
ace
agre
emen
t an
d A
sset
Pro
tect
ion
Agr
eem
ent
agre
ed.
Agr
eed
set
of
pro
tect
ive
pro
visi
on
s (c
on
tain
ed in
dra
ft f
inal
D
CO
).
Agr
eem
ents
co
mp
lete
d.
Rep
rese
nta
tio
n w
ith
dra
wn
wit
h t
he
exce
pti
on
of
ob
ject
ion
to
A
rtic
le 5
2 (
Safe
guar
din
g) in
a le
tte
r to
th
e Ex
A d
ated
7 M
arch
2
01
4.
Pag
e 1
6
No
. O
rgan
isat
ion
St
atu
s as
ref
lect
ed
in s
ub
mis
sio
ns
mad
e f
or
3 M
arch
20
14
d
ead
line
U
pd
ate
d s
tatu
s as
of
11
Mar
ch 2
01
4
An
up
dat
e re
po
rt t
o t
he
SoC
G, w
hic
h w
as s
ign
ed b
y b
oth
p
arti
es w
as s
ub
mit
ted
(D
oc
ref:
AP
P1
59
.04
).
Pro
per
ty H
ead
s o
f Te
rms
agre
ed.
3
P
ort
of
Lon
do
n
Au
tho
rity
A
gree
d s
et o
f p
rote
ctiv
e p
rovi
sio
ns
(co
nta
ined
in d
raft
fin
al
DC
O).
An
un
sign
ed u
pd
ate
rep
ort
to
th
e So
CG
was
su
bm
itte
d
(Do
c re
f: A
PP
159
.05
).
Sign
ed le
gal a
gree
men
t w
ith
th
e ri
ver
regu
lato
rs (
Do
c re
f:
AP
P1
83).
Sign
ed u
pd
ate
re
po
rt t
o t
he
SoC
G d
ate
d 1
0 M
arch
20
14
(D
oc
ref:
AP
P2
15
.02
) co
nta
ined
wit
hin
th
is s
ub
mis
sio
n p
rovi
des
a
sum
mar
y o
f ag
ree
d a
nd
ou
tsta
nd
ing
mat
ters
.
Rep
rese
nta
tio
n w
ith
dra
wn
in le
tter
to
th
e Ex
A d
ate
d
10
Mar
ch 2
01
4.
The
info
rmat
ion
co
nta
ined
in t
he
Sect
ion
12
7 a
nd
Sec
tio
n 1
38
sc
hed
ule
s su
bm
itte
d f
or
11
Mar
ch 2
01
4 d
ead
line
(D
oc
refs
: A
PP
20
1 a
nd
AP
P2
02
) is
agr
eed
. H
ow
ever
, du
e to
th
e p
rin
t d
ead
lines
th
e w
ith
dra
wal
of
the
ob
ject
ion
by
the
PLA
has
no
t b
een
ref
lect
ed in
th
e u
pd
ated
sch
edu
les
bu
t w
ill b
e re
flec
ted
in
th
e u
pd
ate
s to
be
pro
vid
ed t
o t
he
SoS
for
Tran
spo
rt.
The
ExA
sh
ou
ld t
her
efo
re n
ote
th
at c
erti
fica
tio
n u
nd
er S
ecti
on
1
27
an
d t
he
con
sen
t o
f th
e So
S fo
r Tr
ansp
ort
un
der
Sec
tio
n
13
8 is
no
lon
ger
req
uir
ed.
4
M
arin
e M
anag
emen
t O
rgan
isat
ion
A
gree
d D
eem
ed M
arin
e Li
cen
ce (
con
tain
ed in
dra
ft f
inal
D
CO
).
An
up
dat
e re
po
rt s
ign
ed b
y Th
ames
Wat
er
was
su
bm
itte
d
(Do
c re
f: A
PP
159
.06
). T
he
Mar
ine
Man
agem
ent
Org
anis
atio
n t
hen
su
bm
itte
d t
he
up
dat
e re
po
rt s
ign
ed b
y b
oth
par
ties
.
Sign
ed le
gal a
gree
men
t w
ith
th
e ri
ver
regu
lato
rs (
Do
c re
f:
AP
P1
83).
Thro
ugh
th
e p
rovi
sio
n o
f th
e So
CG
sig
ned
by
bo
th p
arti
es o
n
3 M
arch
20
14
to
geth
er w
ith
th
e si
gned
lega
l agr
eem
ent
wit
h
the
rive
r re
gula
tors
(D
oc
ref:
AP
P1
83
), M
MO
has
co
nfi
rmed
th
at t
he
dee
med
mar
ine
licen
ce is
in a
gree
d f
orm
an
d t
hat
all
ou
tsta
nd
ing
mat
ters
rai
sed
by
the
MM
O in
co
nn
ecti
on
wit
h
the
DC
O h
ave
bee
n r
eso
lved
to
th
eir
sati
sfac
tio
n.
The
MM
O
exp
lain
ed t
o u
s o
n 5
Mar
ch, t
hat
th
ey h
ave
no
t m
ain
tain
ed
any
ob
ject
ion
s d
uri
ng
the
exam
inat
ion
an
d, a
cco
rdin
gly,
fe
lt
ther
e w
as n
oth
ing
for
them
to
wit
hd
raw
.
We
no
te t
hat
th
e M
MO
’s f
inal
po
siti
on
is s
et o
ut
in it
s le
tter
o
f 1
1 M
arch
20
14
.
5
En
viro
nm
ent
Age
ncy
A
gree
d s
et o
f p
rote
ctiv
e p
rovi
sio
ns
(co
nta
ined
in d
raft
fin
al
The
SoC
G h
as b
een
sig
ned
by
bo
th p
arti
es.
A c
op
y is
att
ach
ed
Pag
e 1
7
No
. O
rgan
isat
ion
St
atu
s as
ref
lect
ed
in s
ub
mis
sio
ns
mad
e f
or
3 M
arch
20
14
d
ead
line
U
pd
ate
d s
tatu
s as
of
11
Mar
ch 2
01
4
DC
O).
An
un
sign
ed S
oC
G w
as s
ub
mit
ted
(D
oc
ref:
AP
P1
59
.09
).
Sign
ed le
gal a
gree
men
t w
ith
th
e ri
ver
regu
lato
rs (
Do
c re
f:
AP
P1
83).
Pro
per
ty r
elat
ed H
ead
s o
f Te
rms
are
agre
ed
in p
rin
cip
le.
Form
al a
gree
men
t fr
om
Lo
nd
on
Bo
rou
gh o
f W
and
swo
rth
to
acc
ess
at
Bar
n E
lms
awai
ted
an
d is
th
e o
nly
ou
tsta
nd
ing
issu
e.
(Do
c re
f: A
PP
21
5.0
3).
6
N
atio
nal
Gri
d
Agr
eed
set
of
pro
tect
ive
pro
visi
on
s (c
on
tain
ed in
dra
ft f
inal
D
CO
).
Co
mp
lete
d A
sset
Pro
tect
ion
Agr
eem
ent.
Rep
rese
nta
tio
n w
ith
dra
wn
in le
tte
r to
th
e Ex
A d
ate
d 6
Mar
ch
20
14
.
7
U
K P
ow
er
Net
wo
rks
(Lo
nd
on
Po
we
r N
etw
ork
s)
Agr
eed
set
of
pro
tect
ive
pro
visi
on
s (c
on
tain
ed in
dra
ft f
inal
D
CO
).
Co
mp
lete
d A
sset
Pro
tect
ion
Agr
eem
ent.
Co
nfi
rmat
ion
pro
vid
ed in
lett
er t
o E
xA d
ated
28
Feb
ruar
y 2
01
4 t
hat
th
e as
set
pro
tect
ion
agr
eem
ent
has
bee
n
com
ple
ted
an
d t
he
pro
tect
ive
pro
visi
on
s ar
e ag
ree
d.
No
re
leva
nt
rep
rese
nta
tio
n w
as m
ade
by
UK
Po
we
r N
etw
ork
s.
8
B
riti
sh
Tele
com
mu
nic
atio
ns
Plc
Pro
tect
ive
pro
visi
on
s (c
on
tain
ed in
dra
ft f
inal
DC
O)
inco
rpo
rati
ng
com
men
ts f
rom
sta
keh
old
ers.
Ass
et P
rote
ctio
n A
gree
men
t is
bei
ng
pro
gres
sed
by
bo
th
par
ties
.
An
un
sign
ed u
pd
ate
rep
ort
to
th
e So
CG
was
su
bm
itte
d
(Do
c re
f: A
PP
159
.07
) an
d a
sig
ned
ver
sio
n w
as s
ub
mit
ted
to
th
e Ex
A b
y B
T fo
r th
e 12
Feb
ruar
y 2
01
4 d
ead
line.
Bo
th p
arti
es w
ere
wo
rkin
g to
pro
vid
e a
sign
ed u
pd
ate
rep
ort
to
th
e So
CG
, ho
wev
er, a
s in
dic
ated
in A
PP
21
5.0
4, t
his
has
no
t b
een
po
ssib
le.
Bo
th p
arti
es a
re c
on
tin
uin
g to
pro
gres
s th
e A
sset
Pro
tect
ion
A
gree
men
t an
d B
T h
as in
dic
ate
d t
hat
th
ey a
nti
cip
ate
it
sho
uld
be
sign
ed b
y e
nd
of
Mar
ch 2
01
4 o
r sh
ort
ly t
her
eaft
er.
9
V
od
afo
ne
Lim
ited
P
rote
ctiv
e p
rovi
sio
ns
(co
nta
ined
in d
raft
fin
al D
CO
) in
corp
ora
tin
g co
mm
ents
fro
m s
take
ho
lder
s.
Sign
ed S
oC
G w
as s
ub
mit
ted
to
th
e Ex
A b
y V
od
afo
ne
Lim
ited
o
n 1
1 M
arch
20
14
.
10
So
uth
ern
Gas
P
rote
ctiv
e p
rovi
sio
ns
(co
nta
ined
in d
raft
fin
al D
CO
) n
ot
ob
ject
ed t
o.
No
fu
rth
er u
pd
ate.
11
V
irgi
n M
edia
A
gree
d s
et o
f p
rote
ctiv
e p
rovi
sio
ns
(co
nta
ined
in d
raft
fin
al
No
fu
rth
er u
pd
ate
.
Pag
e 1
8
No
. O
rgan
isat
ion
St
atu
s as
ref
lect
ed
in s
ub
mis
sio
ns
mad
e f
or
3 M
arch
20
14
d
ead
line
U
pd
ate
d s
tatu
s as
of
11
Mar
ch 2
01
4
DC
O)
as c
on
firm
ed in
an
em
ail t
o t
he
Pla
nn
ing
Insp
ecto
rate
d
ated
27
Feb
ruar
y 2
014
.
12
C
olt
P
rote
ctiv
e p
rovi
sio
ns
(co
nta
ined
in d
raft
fin
al D
CO
) n
ot
ob
ject
ed t
o.
No
fu
rth
er u
pd
ate.
13
Le
vel 3
P
rote
ctiv
e p
rovi
sio
ns
(co
nta
ined
in d
raft
fin
al D
CO
) h
ave
b
een
dis
cuss
ed b
y b
oth
par
ties
. N
o f
urt
her
up
dat
e.
14
C
anal
& R
iver
Tru
st
Agr
eem
ents
in f
inal
fo
rm, s
ub
ject
to
go
vern
ance
.
Sign
ed S
oC
G s
ub
mit
ted
on
12
Feb
ruar
y 2
01
4 (
Do
c re
f:
AP
P1
16.2
2)
ind
icat
es n
o o
uts
tan
din
g m
atte
rs, i
e,
agre
emen
t h
as b
een
rea
ched
.
Agr
eem
ents
co
mp
lete
d.
Rep
rese
nta
tio
n w
ith
dra
wn
in le
tte
r to
th
e Ex
A d
ate
d 7
Mar
ch
20
14
.
15
Sou
th L
on
do
n a
nd
M
aud
sley
NH
S Fo
un
dat
ion
Tru
st
Sett
lem
ent
dee
d o
ffer
ed.
The
Tru
st h
as r
equ
este
d t
hat
th
is
be
pro
gres
sed
, in
th
e fu
ture
, pri
or
to c
on
stru
ctio
n.
N
o f
urt
her
up
dat
e.
Cro
wn
16
C
row
n E
stat
e La
nd
agr
eem
ent
com
ple
ted
.
Sect
ion
13
5 c
on
sen
t se
cure
d (
Do
c re
f: A
PP
17
4).
No
fu
rth
er u
pd
ate.
17
6 D
uch
y o
f C
orn
wal
l La
nd
agr
eem
ent
con
trac
ts e
xch
ange
d.
Sect
ion
13
5 c
on
sen
t se
cure
d (
Do
c re
f: A
PP
17
5).
No
fu
rth
er u
pd
ate.
18
D
epar
tmen
t o
f W
ork
an
d P
ensi
on
s La
nd
agr
eem
ent
com
ple
ted
.
Sect
ion
13
5 c
on
sen
t se
cure
d (
Do
c re
f: A
PP
12
1.0
2).
No
fu
rth
er
up
dat
e.
19
Fo
reig
n a
nd
C
om
mo
nw
ealt
h O
ffic
e Se
ctio
n 1
35
co
nse
nt
secu
red
as
set
ou
t in
a le
tter
dat
ed
3 M
arch
su
bm
itte
d b
y th
e Fo
reig
n a
nd
Co
mm
on
wea
lth
O
ffic
e to
th
e Ex
A.
No
fu
rth
er u
pd
ate.
Oth
er s
take
ho
lder
s
20
St
Pau
l’s, D
eptf
ord
A
sset
Pro
tect
ion
Agr
eem
ent
com
ple
ted
. N
o f
urt
her
up
dat
e si
nce
all
mat
ters
res
olv
ed
an
d
Pag
e 1
9
No
. O
rgan
isat
ion
St
atu
s as
ref
lect
ed
in s
ub
mis
sio
ns
mad
e f
or
3 M
arch
20
14
d
ead
line
U
pd
ate
d s
tatu
s as
of
11
Mar
ch 2
01
4
Form
al w
ith
dra
wal
of
rep
rese
nta
tio
n b
y th
e D
ioce
se o
f So
uth
war
k se
nt
to E
xA in
lett
er d
ate
d 2
8 F
ebru
ary
20
14
. re
pre
sen
tati
on
wit
hd
raw
n.
21
St
Mar
y’s
Pu
tney
A
sset
Pro
tect
ion
Agr
eem
ent
bei
ng
neg
oti
ate
d.
Agr
eem
ent
in p
rin
cip
le h
as b
een
rea
ched
by
bo
th p
arti
es.
It is
an
tici
pat
ed t
hat
th
e re
pre
sen
tati
on
will
be
wit
hd
raw
n
pri
or
to t
he
clo
se o
f th
e ex
amin
atio
n.
22
St
Lu
ke’s
, Dep
tfo
rd
Sett
lem
ent
Dee
d s
ent.
No
res
po
nse
re
ceiv
ed.
No
fu
rth
er u
pd
ate.
23
A
ll Sa
ints
, W
and
swo
rth
Se
ttle
men
t D
eed
sen
t.
Rep
rese
nta
tio
n w
ith
dra
wn
11
Mar
ch 2
01
4.
24
Se
cret
Inte
llige
nce
Se
rvic
e A
me
nd
ed r
equ
irem
ents
dis
cuss
ed w
ith
th
e Se
cret
In
telli
gen
ce S
ervi
ce.
The
Secr
et In
telli
gen
ce S
ervi
ce t
o a
dvi
se E
xA o
n t
he
pro
po
sed
dra
ft r
equ
irem
ents
.
Co
nfi
rmat
ion
se
nt
to t
he
ExA
th
at t
he
use
of
‘Sec
ret
Inte
llige
nce
Ser
vice
(SI
S)’ w
ith
in S
ched
ule
3 o
f th
e d
raft
fin
al
DC
O is
th
e a
gree
d t
erm
ino
logy
to
be
use
d.
25
C
ory
En
viro
nm
enta
l H
old
ings
Ltd
D
raft
Hea
ds
of
Term
s b
ein
g d
iscu
ssed
.
Fin
al S
oC
G s
ign
ed b
y Th
ames
Wat
er
sub
mit
ted
(D
oc
ref:
A
PP
159
.08
). I
n a
lett
er
to t
he
ExA
dat
ed 3
Mar
ch 2
01
4,
Co
ry E
nvi
ron
men
tal H
old
ings
Ltd
ad
vise
d t
hat
th
ey
rem
ain
ed u
nab
le t
o s
ign
th
e So
CG
.
Co
ry h
as o
uts
tan
din
g is
sues
wit
h t
he
Hea
ds
of
Term
s,
wh
ich
we
are
con
tin
uin
g to
neg
oti
ate
.
Dis
cuss
ion
s ar
e co
nti
nu
ing
on
Hea
ds
of
Term
s.
An
So
CG
sig
ned
by
Tham
es W
ater
was
su
bm
itte
d o
n 3
Mar
ch
20
14
(D
oc
ref:
AP
P1
59
.08
). W
e u
nd
erst
and
th
at C
ory
has
co
un
ters
ign
ed
th
e 3
Mar
ch 2
01
4 v
ersi
on
of
the
SoC
G a
nd
su
bm
itte
d it
to
th
e Ex
A f
or
11
Mar
ch 2
01
4 d
ead
line
.
26
W
este
rn R
iver
sid
e W
aste
Au
tho
rity
D
iscu
ssio
ns
hel
d.
Follo
win
g fu
rth
er r
ece
nt
dis
cuss
ion
s, H
ead
s o
f Te
rms
to b
e p
rogr
esse
d.
Pag
e 2
0
No
. O
rgan
isat
ion
St
atu
s as
ref
lect
ed
in s
ub
mis
sio
ns
mad
e f
or
3 M
arch
20
14
d
ead
line
U
pd
ate
d s
tatu
s as
of
11
Mar
ch 2
01
4
27
M
iner
va W
and
swo
rth
Lt
d
SoC
G s
ign
ed b
y b
oth
par
ties
.
Agr
eem
ent
com
ple
ted
in p
rin
cip
le.
Agr
eem
ent
sign
ed b
y b
oth
par
ties
. Th
e si
gnin
g o
f th
is
agre
emen
t n
egat
es t
he
nee
d f
or
the
pro
po
sed
Req
uir
emen
t co
nta
ined
at
par
a. 1
.11
.12
of
ou
r re
spo
nse
to
qu
esti
on
R5
8.1
(A
PP
16
8).
Rep
rese
nta
tio
n d
ue
to b
e w
ith
dra
wn
pri
or
to t
he
clo
se o
f th
e ex
amin
atio
n, a
s ag
reed
wit
h M
iner
va.
28
Su
rrey
Qu
ays
Ltd
A
gree
men
t st
ill b
ein
g d
iscu
ssed
. B
oth
par
ties
are
co
nti
nu
ing
to w
ork
to
war
ds
com
ple
tin
g an
ag
reem
ent.
29
C
ann
on
Wh
arf
LLP
H
ead
s o
f Te
rms
are
bei
ng
dra
fte
d f
or
an a
gree
men
t.
Co
mp
leti
on
of
the
agre
emen
t w
ill in
clu
de
wit
hd
raw
al o
f th
e tw
o r
epre
sen
tati
on
s m
ade
on
beh
alf
of
this
par
ty
wh
ich
sh
ou
ld o
ccu
r b
efo
re t
he
en
d o
f M
arch
.
Agr
eem
ent
in p
rin
cip
le r
eac
hed
.
Po
siti
on
Sta
tem
ent
sign
ed b
y b
oth
par
ties
(D
oc
ref:
A
PP
21
4.0
3).
Th
e re
pre
sen
tati
on
is a
nti
cip
ate
d t
o b
e w
ith
dra
wn
pri
or
to t
he
clo
se o
f th
e ex
amin
atio
n, a
s d
iscu
ssed
w
ith
Can
no
n W
har
f LL
P.
30
Fr
ee T
rad
e W
har
f M
anag
emen
t C
om
pan
y Lt
d
The
sco
pe
and
ext
ent
of
an A
sset
Pro
tect
ion
Agr
eem
ent
had
bee
n a
gree
d.
Agr
eem
ent
com
ple
ted
.
Rep
rese
nta
tio
n p
arti
ally
wit
hd
raw
n in
lett
er
to t
he
ExA
dat
ed
5
Mar
ch 2
01
4 in
rel
atio
n t
o t
he
New
cast
le J
etty
an
d
sett
lem
ent.
31
B
riti
sh G
rove
Stu
dio
s A
gree
men
t b
ein
g d
iscu
ssed
. A
gree
men
t b
ein
g d
iscu
ssed
.
32
Lo
nd
on
Du
ck T
ou
rs
Hea
ds
of
Term
s fo
r A
gree
men
t su
bm
itte
d b
ut
un
able
to
re
ach
agr
eem
ent
on
co
mm
erci
al t
erm
s.
Two
So
CG
sig
ned
an
d s
ub
mit
ted
on
12
Feb
ruar
y 2
01
4 (
Do
c re
f: A
PP
116
.30
an
d S
oC
G s
ub
mit
ted
by
the
Po
rt o
f Lo
nd
on
A
uth
ori
ty).
No
fu
rth
er u
pd
ate
.
33
C
EMEX
UK
Op
erat
ion
s Lt
d
Ass
et P
rote
ctio
n A
gree
men
t an
d L
and
agr
eem
ent
Hea
ds
of
Term
s d
iscu
ssed
.
No
fu
rth
er u
pd
ate
.
Pag
e 2
1
No
. O
rgan
isat
ion
St
atu
s as
ref
lect
ed
in s
ub
mis
sio
ns
mad
e f
or
3 M
arch
20
14
d
ead
line
U
pd
ate
d s
tatu
s as
of
11
Mar
ch 2
01
4
34
R
oya
l Ho
spit
al C
hel
sea
Pro
per
ty H
ead
s o
f Te
rms
clo
se t
o a
gree
men
t.
Sign
ed H
ead
s o
f Te
rms.
Hea
ds
of
Term
s n
ow
bei
ng
pro
gres
sed
into
fu
ll ag
reem
ent.
35
B
atte
rsea
Pro
ject
Lan
d
Co
mp
any
Lim
ite
d
Lan
d a
gree
men
t H
ead
s o
f Te
rms
agre
ed
, an
d c
on
trac
ts
bei
ng
neg
oti
ate
d.
Targ
et c
om
ple
tio
n d
ate
late
Mar
ch/e
arly
A
pri
l 201
4.
No
fu
rth
er u
pd
ate
.
36
C
hri
sto
ph
er P
oll
Ass
et P
rote
ctio
n A
gree
men
t o
ffer
ed a
nd
dis
cuss
ion
s st
ill
con
tin
uin
g.
Agr
eem
ent
com
ple
ted
.
Rep
rese
nta
tio
n p
arti
ally
wit
hd
raw
n in
lett
er
to t
he
ExA
dat
ed
7
Mar
ch 2
01
4 in
rel
atio
n t
o a
sse
t p
rote
ctio
n.
37
N
erit
a P
rop
erti
es L
td
Agr
eem
ent
com
ple
ted
.
Form
al p
arti
al w
ith
dra
wal
of
rep
rese
nta
tio
n c
on
firm
ed b
y le
tter
to
th
e Ex
A d
ate
d 6
Feb
ruar
y 2
01
4.
Thei
r o
bje
ctio
n t
o
imp
acts
fro
m c
on
stru
ctio
n (
traf
fic,
no
ise,
vib
rati
on
, du
st,
soci
o-e
con
om
ic e
ffec
ts a
nd
cu
mu
lati
ve e
ffec
ts)
still
re
mai
ns
and
will
no
t b
e w
ith
dra
wn
pri
or
to t
he
clo
se o
f th
e ex
amin
atio
n.
No
fu
rth
er u
pd
ate
.
38
R
oya
l Mai
l Plc
A
gree
men
t co
mp
lete
d.
Form
al w
ith
dra
wal
of
rep
rese
nta
tio
n p
rovi
ded
to
ExA
in a
le
tter
dat
ed 6
Feb
ruar
y 2
014
.
No
fu
rth
er u
pd
ate
sin
ce a
ll m
atte
rs r
eso
lve
d a
nd
re
pre
sen
tati
on
wit
hd
raw
n.
39
St
Jam
es G
rou
p
Hea
ds
of
Term
s cl
ose
to
bei
ng
fin
alis
ed.
No
fu
rth
er u
pd
ate.
Loca
l au
tho
riti
es
40
C
ity
of
Lon
do
n
Pro
tect
ive
pro
visi
on
s ar
e b
ein
g d
iscu
ssed
by
bo
th p
arti
es.
Tho
se c
on
tain
ed in
th
e d
raft
fin
al D
CO
are
agr
eed
, wit
h
on
e ex
cep
tio
n.
Lan
d a
gree
men
t H
ead
s o
f Te
rms
bei
ng
dis
cuss
ed b
y b
oth
p
arti
es.
Sign
ed J
oin
t St
atem
ent
on
pro
tect
ive
pro
visi
on
s is
en
clo
sed
at
AP
P2
16
.
Pro
per
ty a
gree
men
t b
ein
g p
rogr
esse
d.
It is
an
tici
pat
ed t
hat
th
is w
ill b
e co
mp
lete
d b
y Se
pte
mb
er 2
01
4.
41
Lo
nd
on
Bo
rou
gh o
f A
gree
d P
rop
erty
Hea
ds
of
Term
s.
Pro
per
ty H
ead
s o
f te
rms
agre
ed a
nd
sig
ned
.
Pag
e 2
2
No
. O
rgan
isat
ion
St
atu
s as
ref
lect
ed
in s
ub
mis
sio
ns
mad
e f
or
3 M
arch
20
14
d
ead
line
U
pd
ate
d s
tatu
s as
of
11
Mar
ch 2
01
4
Wan
dsw
ort
h
42
Lo
nd
on
Bo
rou
gh o
f Le
wis
ham
Th
ere
has
bee
n n
o p
rogr
ess
on
ter
ms
for
the
pro
per
ty
agre
emen
t.
Sect
ion
10
6 a
gree
men
t ex
ecu
ted
an
d c
om
ple
ted
(D
oc
ref:
A
PP
119
.13
).
Mee
tin
g to
be
arra
nge
d w
ith
LB
Lew
ish
am e
stat
es
surv
eyo
r d
uri
ng
Mar
ch 2
01
4.
43
Lo
nd
on
Bo
rou
gh o
f H
amm
ersm
ith
an
d
Fulh
am
Pro
per
ty H
ead
s o
f Te
rms
agre
ed a
nd
lega
l du
e d
ilige
nce
p
rogr
essi
ng.
Co
ntr
act
do
cum
enta
tio
n is
sti
ll aw
aite
d, w
ith
ex
chan
ge n
ow
an
tici
pat
ed in
Ap
ril/
May
20
14
. Th
e re
pre
sen
tati
on
s w
ill t
her
efo
re n
ot
be
wit
hd
raw
n.
No
fu
rth
er u
pd
ate.
44
Lo
nd
on
Bo
rou
gh o
f To
wer
Ham
lets
Th
ere
has
bee
n n
o p
rogr
ess
on
ter
ms
for
the
pro
per
ty
agre
emen
t.
Sect
ion
10
6 a
gree
men
t e
xecu
ted
an
d c
om
ple
ted
(D
oc
ref:
A
PP
119
.15
).
No
fu
rth
er u
pd
ate.
Aff
ect
ed
Per
son
s
45
C
apit
alst
art
Ltd
Fo
llow
ing
a co
nst
ruct
ive
mee
tin
g d
uri
ng
wh
ich
we
d
iscu
ssed
th
e re
vise
d N
on
-sta
tuto
ry O
ff-s
ite
Mit
iga
tion
an
d
Co
mp
ensa
tio
n P
olic
y. T
her
e is
co
nfi
den
ce t
hat
th
is w
ill b
e fi
t fo
r p
urp
ose
an
d t
her
e is
a c
om
mit
men
t to
pu
t in
pla
ce
an a
gree
men
t p
rio
r to
co
mm
ence
men
t o
f th
e co
nst
ruct
ion
w
ork
s at
Pu
tney
Em
ban
kmen
t Fo
resh
ore
.
No
fu
rth
er u
pd
ate.
46
Ia
n H
ud
son
Em
ail r
esp
on
se r
ecei
ved
fro
m D
r H
ud
son
, on
4 F
ebru
ary
201
4, i
n w
hic
h h
e co
nti
nu
es t
o q
ues
tio
n t
he
nee
d f
or
tem
po
rary
use
of
his
par
kin
g sp
ace.
He
ackn
ow
led
ges
ou
r p
rop
osa
l fo
r al
tern
ativ
e p
rovi
sio
n w
ou
ld b
e lo
gica
l if
he
was
co
nvi
nce
d o
f th
e n
eed
fo
r u
se o
f h
is s
pac
e.
No
fu
rth
er u
pd
ate.
47
G
rah
am G
rou
p L
imit
ed
an
d J
ewso
n L
imit
ed
Dis
cuss
ion
s w
ith
Jew
son
s Li
mit
ed a
re o
ngo
ing.
We
acc
ept
that
co
mp
ensa
tio
n f
or
bu
sin
ess
dis
turb
ance
will
be
pay
able
N
o f
urt
her
up
dat
e.
Pag
e 2
3
No
. O
rgan
isat
ion
St
atu
s as
ref
lect
ed
in s
ub
mis
sio
ns
mad
e f
or
3 M
arch
20
14
d
ead
line
U
pd
ate
d s
tatu
s as
of
11
Mar
ch 2
01
4
as d
isp
lace
men
t fr
om
th
e p
rop
erty
will
be,
in e
ffec
t,
per
man
ent,
tak
ing
acco
un
t o
f th
e la
nd
ow
ner
s’ a
spir
atio
ns
to r
edev
elo
p t
he
site
.
48
H
allia
rd P
rop
erty
C
om
pan
y Li
mit
ed
Fr
eeh
old
er o
f P
ho
enix
Wh
arf
at G
ree
nw
ich
. D
raft
Hea
ds
of
Term
s fo
r p
rop
erty
agr
eem
ent
sub
mit
ted
. G
en
eral
ag
reem
ent
in p
rin
cip
le o
n le
ase
du
rin
g co
nst
ruct
ion
, bu
t sp
ecif
ic t
erm
s st
ill t
o b
e ag
ree
d, m
ain
ly a
rou
nd
leve
l of
ren
t an
d c
om
pen
sati
on
rel
atin
g to
def
erre
d r
edev
elo
pm
ent
of
the
site
.
No
fu
rth
er u
pd
ate.
49
Li
vett
’s L
aun
ches
Ltd
Si
nce
13
Jan
uar
y 2
014
, th
ere
hav
e b
een
fe
w e
xch
ange
s w
ith
Ch
ris
Live
tts.
Th
ere
was
an
off
er t
o p
ut
toge
ther
a
SoC
G b
ut
the
con
dit
ion
s at
tach
ed t
o t
his
wer
e n
ot
acce
pta
ble
to
Th
ames
Wat
er a
nd
wo
uld
hav
e re
qu
ired
co
mm
itm
ents
in r
esp
ect
of
mat
ters
ou
tsid
e th
e lim
its
of
lan
d t
o b
e ac
qu
ired
or
use
d.
Thes
e is
sues
are
we
ll d
ocu
men
ted
in t
he
wri
tte
n
rep
rese
nta
tio
ns
sub
mit
ted
to
th
e Ex
A (
AP
P3
1.2
1)
and
as
exp
lain
ed a
t th
e h
eari
ngs
, we
no
w a
nti
cip
ate
the
rep
rese
nta
tio
ns
fro
m C
hri
s Li
vett
will
rem
ain
wit
h n
o
pro
spec
t o
f w
ith
dra
wal
pri
or
to t
he
clo
se o
f th
e ex
amin
atio
n.
No
fu
rth
er u
pd
ate.
50
Lo
oke
rs M
oto
r G
rou
p
Lim
ited
W
e w
rote
to
Lo
oke
rs M
oto
r G
rou
p o
n 2
7 J
anu
ary
20
14
w
ith
ou
r p
rop
osa
ls a
nd
aga
in o
n 2
7 F
ebru
ary
20
14
an
d 7
M
arch
201
4.
We
hav
e n
ot
rece
ived
an
y fu
rth
er
corr
esp
on
den
ce f
rom
Lo
oke
rs M
oto
r G
rou
p.
No
fu
rth
er u
pd
ate.
51
Th
e M
erce
rs C
om
pan
y Th
e co
rres
po
nd
ent
was
co
nta
cted
on
31
Jan
uar
y 2
01
4 b
y le
tter
wit
h f
urt
her
info
rmat
ion
on
th
e p
roje
ct b
ased
up
on
th
eir
rep
rese
nta
tio
n.
Ass
et P
rote
ctio
n A
gree
men
t p
rogr
esse
d t
o f
inal
fo
rm.
Rep
rese
nta
tio
n w
ith
dra
wn
11
Mar
ch 2
01
4.
Pag
e 2
4
No
. O
rgan
isat
ion
St
atu
s as
ref
lect
ed
in s
ub
mis
sio
ns
mad
e f
or
3 M
arch
20
14
d
ead
line
U
pd
ate
d s
tatu
s as
of
11
Mar
ch 2
01
4
52
N
ort
rust
No
min
ees
Lim
ited
Le
gal d
ue
dili
gen
ce is
at
an a
dva
nce
d s
tage
wit
h c
on
trac
ts
awai
ted
to
fac
ilita
te a
n a
nti
cip
ate
d e
xch
ange
of
con
trac
ts
in A
pri
l/M
ay 2
014
. Th
e re
pre
sen
tati
on
s w
ill t
her
efo
re n
ot
be
wit
hd
raw
n.
No
fu
rth
er u
pd
ate.
53
R
oya
l Lo
nd
on
Mu
tual
In
sura
nce
So
ciet
y Li
mit
ed
Agr
eed
Hea
ds
of
Term
s w
ith
th
e R
oya
l Lo
nd
on
Mu
tual
In
sura
nce
So
ciet
y Li
mit
ed.
The
form
al le
gal a
gree
men
t is
ex
pec
ted
to
be
com
ple
ted
at
the
end
of
Mar
ch 2
01
4.
No
fu
rth
er u
pd
ate.
54
Ta
tte
rsh
all C
astl
e
Term
s ag
reed
wit
h C
row
n E
stat
e fo
r re
loca
tio
n o
f m
oo
rin
g,
and
agr
eem
ent
in p
rin
cip
le w
ith
Cit
y o
f W
est
min
ster
fo
r re
loca
tio
n o
f ac
cess
. G
ener
al u
nd
erst
and
ing
wit
h T
CG
Bar
s Li
mit
ed (
ship
ow
ner
) o
n r
elo
cati
on
pro
cess
an
d
com
pen
sati
on
, bu
t n
o f
orm
al a
gree
men
t ye
t.
No
fu
rth
er u
pd
ate
.
55
Th
e B
atte
rsea
Bar
ge
Mee
tin
gs w
ere
hel
d in
sp
rin
g/su
mm
er 2
01
3 w
ith
Bat
ters
ea
Bar
ge a
nd
St
Jam
es (
wh
o c
on
tro
l acc
ess
to t
he
vess
el)
to
dis
cuss
th
e re
loca
tio
n o
f th
e b
arge
7m
to
th
e w
est.
B
atte
rsea
Bar
ge u
nd
erst
oo
d t
he
req
uir
emen
t fo
r th
em t
o
mo
ve a
nd
ind
icat
ed t
hat
th
ey w
ou
ld li
ke t
his
to
hap
pen
as
late
as
po
ssib
le p
rio
r to
th
e st
art
of
ou
r co
nst
ruct
ion
wo
rks.
St
Jam
es s
tate
d t
hat
th
ey w
ou
ld p
refe
r th
e m
ove
to
tak
e p
lace
as
soo
n a
s p
oss
ible
so
as
to c
oin
cid
e w
ith
th
eir
re-l
and
scap
ing
of
the
rive
rban
k. A
ny
mo
ve p
rio
r to
th
e st
art
of
ou
r co
nst
ruct
ion
wo
rks
wo
uld
nee
d a
gree
men
t b
etw
een
St
Jam
es a
nd
Bat
ters
ea
Bar
ge a
nd
req
uir
e a
sep
arat
e p
lan
nin
g p
erm
issi
on
to
be
sub
mit
ted
to
th
e Lo
nd
on
Bo
rou
gh o
f W
and
swo
rth
. W
e w
ill c
on
tin
ue
to
acti
vely
en
gage
wit
h b
oth
par
ties
to
est
ablis
h a
mu
tual
ly
agre
eab
le s
olu
tio
n.
No
fu
rth
er u
pd
ate.
56
M
alco
lm H
olli
s LL
P
Follo
win
g fr
equ
ent
atte
mp
ts t
o c
on
tact
th
ose
rep
rese
nti
ng
the
occ
up
iers
of
thes
e b
usi
nes
s u
nit
s, a
n e
mai
l was
A
mee
tin
g h
as n
ow
bee
n a
rran
ged
to
tak
e p
lace
on
11
Mar
ch
20
14
. Th
is is
wit
h a
n a
gen
t o
nly
rec
en
tly
app
oin
ted
to
Pag
e 2
5
No
. O
rgan
isat
ion
St
atu
s as
ref
lect
ed
in s
ub
mis
sio
ns
mad
e f
or
3 M
arch
20
14
d
ead
line
U
pd
ate
d s
tatu
s as
of
11
Mar
ch 2
01
4
rece
ived
on
24
Feb
ruar
y 2
01
4, p
rovi
din
g u
s w
ith
det
ails
of
a n
ewly
ap
po
inte
d a
gen
t w
ith
wh
om
we
hav
e b
een
ask
ed
to
en
gage
.
Ther
e h
as y
et t
o b
e a
mee
tin
g ar
ran
ged
an
d t
her
e w
ill b
e n
o p
rosp
ect
of
agre
emen
t to
re
po
rt b
efo
re t
he
clo
se o
f th
e ex
amin
atio
n.
The
rep
rese
nta
tio
ns
will
th
eref
ore
no
t b
e w
ith
dra
wn
.
rep
rese
nt
the
join
t in
tere
sts
of
all p
arti
es a
t B
roo
ks C
ou
rt.
It
is b
elie
ved
to
be
the
com
men
cem
ent
of
wh
at w
ill t
hen
b
eco
me
neg
oti
atio
ns
to r
each
a m
utu
ally
acc
ep
tab
le
agre
emen
t w
ith
bo
th t
he
ow
ner
s an
d o
ccu
pie
rs o
f B
roo
ks
Co
urt
. Th
is p
arty
is t
he
occ
up
ier
of
five
un
its
in B
roo
ks C
ou
rt.
57
M
anif
est,
MM
K
Ente
rpri
ses,
Kir
tlin
g P
rop
erti
es L
td, J
oh
n
Wo
od
man
, Ian
Th
om
pso
n, P
equ
od
B
VI I
nc
Follo
win
g fr
equ
ent
atte
mp
ts t
o c
on
tact
th
ose
rep
rese
nti
ng
the
ow
ner
s o
f th
ese
bu
sin
ess
un
its,
an
em
ail w
as r
ece
ived
o
n 2
4 F
ebru
ary
201
4, p
rovi
din
g u
s w
ith
det
ails
of
a n
ewly
ap
po
inte
d a
gen
t w
ith
wh
om
we
hav
e b
een
ask
ed
to
en
gage
.
Ther
e h
as y
et t
o b
e a
mee
tin
g ar
ran
ged
an
d t
her
e w
ill b
e n
o p
rosp
ect
of
agre
emen
t to
re
po
rt b
efo
re t
he
clo
se o
f th
e ex
amin
atio
n.
The
rep
rese
nta
tio
ns
will
th
eref
ore
no
t b
e w
ith
dra
wn
.
A m
eeti
ng
has
no
w b
een
arr
ange
d t
o t
ake
pla
ce o
n 1
1 M
arch
2
01
4. T
his
is w
ith
an
age
nt
on
ly r
ece
ntl
y ap
po
inte
d t
o
rep
rese
nt
the
join
t in
tere
sts
of
all p
arti
es a
t B
roo
ks C
ou
rt.
It
is b
elie
ved
to
be
the
com
men
cem
ent
of
wh
at w
ill t
hen
b
eco
me
neg
oti
atio
ns
to r
each
a m
utu
ally
acc
ep
tab
le
agre
emen
t w
ith
bo
th t
he
ow
ner
s an
d o
ccu
pie
rs o
f B
roo
ks
Co
urt
. Th
ese
par
ties
are
th
e fr
eeh
old
ow
ner
s o
f u
nit
s 2
-7, 9
an
d 1
0 B
roo
ks C
ou
rt.
Top Related