Thames Tideway Tunnel The Point 37 North Wharf Road Paddington, London W2 1AF

Tel: Fax: Web:

020 3147 7700 020 3147 7701 www.thamestidewaytunnel.co.uk

Registered in England and Wales No. 2366661 Registered office: Clearwater Court, Vastern Road Reading, Berkshire, RG1 8DB

The Planning Inspectorate

3/18 Eagle Way Temple Quay House 2 The Square BRISTOL BS1 6PN

Your ref Our ref Name Phone Email

WW010001 DCO-DT-APP-ZZ100-970000 Phil Stride +44 (0)20 3147 7700 Phil.Stride@thameswater.co.uk

FAO Mark Wilson (Principal Case Manager) 11 March 2014 Dear Sirs PLANNING ACT 2008 THAMES WATER UTILITIES LIMITED APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT CONSENT FOR THE THAMES TIDEWAY TUNNEL

1 Purpose of this letter

1.1.1 As requested by the Examining Authority (ExA) for the 11 March 2014 deadline, we enclose our final written responses. Our submission comprises:

our responses to representations from stakeholders submitted for 3 March 2014 a.deadline

an updated version of the Guide to the Application b.

errata for our 3 March 2014 submission c.

revised Section 127 and Section 138 schedules d.

updated application documents following a further consistency check e.

an update on legal agreements f.

an update on matters progressed and yet to be resolved. g.

1.1.2 A list of documents enclosed as part of this submission is set out at Schedule 1.

2 Our responses to representation from stakeholders

2.1.1 Representations were submitted by a range of third parties for the 3 March 2014 deadline. We have reviewed these responses and, in many cases, they do not raise new points and/or matters which materially affect the examination of the application. Our responses, contained at APP198, therefore focus on submissions which do raise new points and/or matters which materially affect the examination of the application.

Page 2

3 Guide to the Application

3.1.1 We enclose an updated version of the Guide to the Application at APP199. We have sought to update the guide to include all of the documents submitted during the examination, including those forming part of our 11 March 2014 submission. This updated document has been prepared in parallel with the other documents in today’s submission. The long lead in time for desktop publishing the guide means that there may be some minor discrepancies between what we enclose as part of our 11 March 2014 submission and the guide. The definitive list of what we have submitted today is contained at Schedule 1 to this letter.

3.1.2 The updated Guide to the Application comprises three parts:

Part 1 contains a list of our application documents submitted in February 2013; a.where appropriate, it also indicates where revised versions of drawings, plans and documents have been submitted during the examination of the application.

Part 2 identifies the documents submitted during the examination. It also identifies b.the documents where we have provided updates and/or revised versions during the examination.

Part 3 provides a description of each submitted document. With the exception of c.documents forming part of today’s submission, where possible, the document titles are also hyperlinked to the relevant document on the Planning Inspectorate’s website. It also contains a document index, which details the box and/or folder reference for each document submitted in hard copy.

4 Errata and clarifications

4.1.1 Following a further review of documents forming our 3 March 2014 submission, we have identified a number of errata to the Book of Reference. These are enclosed at APP200.

4.1.2 We also enclose, at APP206, a slightly amended version of the Design Principles. Following further discussions with the Environment Agency, we have agreed to amend para. 3.6.1, in order to clarify the meaning of the sentence. This clarification has been made in direct response to comments from the Environment Agency in its 3 March 2014 submission. We enclose three documents relating to the Design Principles:

a ‘clean’ final version which incorporates the clarification a.

a ‘comparite’ which shows the clarification made against the version issued on b.3 March 2014; we only include the page where the amendment has been made

a ‘comparite’ which shows the clarification made against the submission version c.issued on 28 February 2013; we only include the page where the amendment has been made.

5 Section 127 and Section 138 schedules

5.1.1 We enclose, at APP201 and APP202, updated Section 127 and Section 128 schedules. The schedules have been updated to accommodate the following amendments:

Errata resulting from further information that has been supplied by stakeholders; a.this includes interests not falling within the definition of Section 127 or Section 138 of the Planning Act 2008.

Page 3

Submissions made to the ExA confirming that representations have been b.withdrawn. Where this is the case in the Section 127 Schedule, the relevant plots have been removed. For the Section 138 Schedule, we have noted against the relevant plots that a withdrawal has been made. One withdrawal was submitted too late for the schedules to note this. This is a withdrawal made on 10 March 2014 by the Port of London Authority (PLA) and we would therefore ask the ExA to note that the PLA plots shown on the schedules no longer require certification under Section 127 or consent by the Secretary of State for Transport under Section 138.

5.1.2 The letter of partial withdrawal of representations from Network Rail of 7 March 2014 states clearly that Network Rail’s objection in respect of the applications for certification are withdrawn. However, Sections 127 and 138 of the Planning Act 2008 refer to the withdrawal of representations rather than withdrawal of objections. The schedules for the Section 127 application submitted for 11 March 2014(APP201) omit the Network Rail plots and, for Section 138 (APP202), note that Network Rail has withdrawn. In the event that the ExA considers that Network Rail has not withdrawn its representation for these purposes, it is asked to include in its determination for Section 127 certification for Network Rail its interests as noted against plots 42,43 and 53 (City of London), 32 (City of Westminster), 179 (London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham), 187, 190, 192, 199 and 200 (London Borough of Lewisham), 15 (London Borough of Newham), 4 (London Borough of Southwark), 67,68,69,70,72,230 (London Borough of Wandsworth) and 8, 9, 10, 11 12, 13, 18a (Royal Borough of Greenwich). These were all listed in the submission of S127 schedules for 3 March 2014 (APP193). For Section 138, Network Rail’s interests are listed in the 11 March 2014 submission but if the ExA considers the representation not to have been withdrawn, can these please be considered for consent under Section 138 (4) (b).

5.1.3 Copies of the updated schedules have also been submitted to the relevant Secretaries of State.

6 Application document consistency check

6.1 Overview

6.1.1 In our 3 March 2014 cover letter, we noted that in some of the recently updated documents, issues remained regarding internal consistency. We have further reviewed the documents submitted for the 3 March 2014 deadline and enclose updated versions of the following documents:

Mitigation Route Map (APP203) a.

draft final DCO (APP204) b.

Code of Construction Practice (CoCP) Part A: General Requirements (APP205) c.

River Transport Strategy (APP207) d.

Environmental Statement Update Report (APP208) e.

Non-statutory Off-site Mitigation and Compensation Policy (APP210) f.

Exceptional Hardship Procedure (APP213). g.

6.1.2 As stated in our cover letter dated 3 March 2014, these documents have only been updated to ensure they are internally consistent and the updates do not materially change the meaning of the documents, or contain material changes in our approach to issues or introduce new polices. Where the amendments contained within the

Page 4

documents go beyond updates to cross-references, etc, a description of the changes made is provided in the subsections below.

6.1.3 ‘Comparites’ are enclosed for each of the documents listed above to show the changes between the different versions of the documents. ‘Comparites’ against the 3 March 2014 versions are enclosed for all the documents listed above. Where appropriate, we also enclose ‘comparites’ against the 28 February 2013 version.

6.2 Code of Construction Practice

6.2.1 An updated version of the CoCP has been submitted rather than issuing errata for the two amendments that have been identified. A mistake was made during the editing process, which resulted in the document title changing from Code of Construction Practice, Part A: General Requirements to Code of Construction Practice, Part A: General controls, which is how it appeared in the February and March 2014 versions (APP104, APP125 and APP178). The document enclosed at APP205 returns the CoCP to its original title. Although a minor error, this erratum was apparent on the title page, page i, and in the footer of every page of the document. We therefore considered it was more appropriate to update and resubmit the CoCP than provide sheets of errata.

6.2.2 We also identified an erratum in relation to underwater noise and vibration. Text at para. 6.4.7a was removed from the February 2014 versions of the document (APP104 and APP125), but reinstated in the 3 March 2014 version (APP178). The reinstatement should have been carried out with a slight clarification to ensure that an incorrect assumption could not be implied. In APP178, para. 6.4.7a stated: “avoiding piling at night to ensure windows of no disturbance within each 24-hour period”. In the final enclosed version, para. 6.4.7a now states: “piling shall only occur during standard working hours. Avoiding piling at night also ensures windows of no disturbance within each 24-hour period”. We do not believe that this amendment constitutes a material change since the amendment has been made in the interest of clarity and to give reassurance that, although respite periods for fish will occur during the evening and night, it is not our intention to pile outside of standard working hours.

6.3 Environmental Statement Update Report

6.3.1 The Environmental Statement Update Report has been submitted in updated form at APP208 to incorporate two main changes.

6.3.2 We have made corrections to ensure that the cross-references in the update report are consistent with the draft final DCO, including amended Requirements, which is also resubmitted (at APP204).

6.3.3 It has also come to our attention that the summary assessment tables, contained in the appendices to the update report submitted for the 3 March 2014 deadline (APP184), were edited incorrectly. As a result, the changes made to the assessment tables were not shown in ‘tracked changes’. This formatting anomaly has been resolved and the summary tables, enclosed at APP208.01.01 and APP208.01.07 onwards, are now correct.

6.4 Book of Reference

6.4.1 The entire Book of Reference was republished for the 3 March 2014 submission (APP138.01 to APP138.15). Since then, a number of statutory undertakers have supplied additional information about their assets and property. In addition, we have

Page 5

received further information regarding interests held by government departments at Albert Embankment Foreshore. These plots were always identified as Crown land but the identity of the government department which owns them has now been clarified. These are captured in the errata at APP200 and have also informed the revised section 127/138 tables.

7 Update on legal agreements

7.1 Legal agreement with the river regulators

7.1.1 In our cover letter dated 3 March 2014, we indicated that we would submit a completed legal agreement between Thames Water, the Port of London Authority, the Environment Agency and the Marine Management Organisation on either 3 March 2014 or 11 March 2014. A copy of the completed legal agreement was submitted under separate cover on 3 March 2014 (APP183).

7.2 Legal agreement for securing off-site mitigation policies and resources for local planning authorities

7.2.1 We enclose, at APP209.03, the final form legal agreement and associated Section 106 unilateral undertaking between Thames Water and the 15 local planning authorities (the LPAs). This deed seeks to ensure our compliance with the policies for securing off-site mitigation and compensation relating to the project. The covering note at APP209.01 summarises the background and arrangement of the deed, and APP209.02 sets out how we sought agreement with the LPAs and lists those LPAs which provided detailed comments on the draft deeds.

7.2.2 We further enclose, at APP209.06, copies of the letter dated 10 March 2014 sent to the councils which accompanied engrossments of the legal agreement and requested confirmation from the LPAs of their ability and/or willingness to sign the deed against a proposed deadline of 24 March 2014. Where any LPA confirms it is unwilling or unable to sign the legal agreement, the letter confirms our undertaking that we will observe the terms of the legal agreement as if all LPAs were a signatory party.

7.2.3 Once each of the LPAs willing to sign the legal agreement returns the executed agreement to us, we will proceed to execute the agreement and complete it on a date that will be confirmed to the LPAs. Those LPAs which do not wish, or are not able to enter into the legal agreement will have the benefit of the undertaking referred to in paragraph 7.2.2 above. Upon the grant of development consent, we will proceed to execute the Section 106 unilateral undertaking as provided for in the legal agreement.

7.2.4 We are aware that the London Borough of Ealing emailed the Planning Inspectorate on 10 March 2014 (see email to thamestunnel@infrastructure.gsi.gov.uk from Neil Bleakley at the London Borough of Ealing at 13:52) explaining why it would not be completing the legal agreement. It included with that submission earlier correspondence between our solicitors, Berwin Leighton Paisner LLP, and the borough. In that correspondence, Berwin Leighton Paisner explains why we have offered the legal agreement to the LPAs, including reference to the extensive discussions on the issue of noise mitigation that have taken place at issue specific hearings.

7.2.5 We are disappointed that the London Borough of Ealing has responded in the manner it has. We note that the council has no authority to enter the agreement at this time, but do not accept that the reasons given in the three bullet points represent insurmountable reasons not to enter the legal agreement. In that respect, APP209.01

Page 6

explains how the agreement and subsequently the Section 106 unilateral undertaking secure the off-site mitigation policies and resources for the LPAs. These proposals have been discussed with the ExA and the LPAs which attended the relevant issue specific hearings. There is a general acceptance that the off-site mitigation policies and the proposals regarding local authority resourcing need to be secured, and neither the ExA nor any of the LPAs attending the issue specific hearings has raised any objection or concern as to the principle of our approach.

7.2.6 Of course the London Borough of Ealing will benefit from the undertaking referred to in paragraph 7.2.2 and, if the development consent is granted, it will be in receipt of the completed Section 106 unilateral undertaking. Notwithstanding its comment that the legal agreement and unilateral undertaking protect individual property interests, we believe it is reasonable to secure these protections by way of Section 106 obligation, not least given the views expressed forcibly by other LPAs that they must have some way of protecting the communities they represent; a point we understand to be of importance to the ExA also. We believe that the legal agreement and unilateral undertaking is an appropriate, proportionate and lawful response to the issues raised.

8 Update on matters progressed and yet to be resolved

8.1.1 In our cover letter for the 3 March 2014 submission, we indicated that we would provide an update as part of our 11 March 2014 submission on how matters identified as not yet resolved have progressed in the intervening period. This update is provided at Schedule 2. Where appropriate, a hyperlink is provided to referenced letters and/or agreements.

9 Other matters

9.1 National Planning Policy Noise Guidance

9.1.1 This was formally published by the Department of Communities and Local Government on 6 March 2014. As it is in the public domain and the beta version of the National Planning Policy Guidance (NPPG) has been the subject of many questions from, and submissions to, the ExA during the examination period, we hope it is of assistance to confirm the following:

The published version of the NPPG is materially the same as the beta version a.

It now explicitly references government noise policy (the Noise Policy Statement for b.England 2010(NPSE)); and

It now explicitly references the National Policy Statement (NPS) for Waste Water. c.

9.1.2 It is therefore clear that the Government regards the NPS noise policy as being consistent with and part of national noise policy. Just as with the latest draft NPS for National Networks (which contains the same words as paragraph 4.9.9 of the Waste Water NPS and directly references the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), the NPSE and the NPPG), no different policy is proposed.

9.1.3 There are two technical points where the published guidance has been modified compared to the beta version that are relevant to the project. Both of these clarifications relate to the table that summarises the noise exposure hierarchy. Neither affects our interpretation of policy.

Page 7

9.1.4 For observed adverse effects, the published table clarifies that these effects give rise to the “potential for some reported sleep disturbance”. This importantly differs from ‘non-awakening’ sleep disturbance, as noted in the table of the beta version. The change clarifies that objectively measured sleep disturbance due to noise does not generally occur until a significant observed adverse effect level is reached. As noted in our oral submissions to the noise hearings, 'reported' sleep disturbance relates to self-reported disturbance where people believe they have been disturbed but objective measures show that they have not been disturbed. This occurs because people generally wake up many times a night for different reasons (eg, anxiety, needing to go to the toilet, etc) and on hearing a noise can mistakenly believe it is the noise that woke them. A significant observed adverse effect level for sleep disturbance needs to reflect objectively observed sleep disturbance, as set out in our submissions (APP157, Section 5.2). The distinction between reported and objective sleep disturbance therefore needs to be borne carefully in mind when considering guidance such as that provided by the World Health Organization when setting a significant observed adverse effect level (SOAEL).

9.1.5 For significant observed adverse effects, the published table clarifies that these effects relate to “where there is no alternative ventilation, having to keep windows closed most of the time because of the noise”. The text underlined has been added since the beta version. Examples of alternative ventilation would be either ventilation to a room from another window on a quiet façade of the property, or the provision of additional mechanical or other attenuated ventilation equivalent to an open window. This is the form of additional ventilation provided by the noise insulation package proposed by the project and reinforces our submissions that noise insulation trigger levels proposed by the project align with the relevant significant observed adverse effect level for day, evening or night (APP157, Section 3.2 and Appendix A).

9.1.6 The NPPG clarification confirms that:

a significant observed adverse effect does not necessarily occur when windows a.facing the noise have to be closed most of the time if the same room has access to a window to a quiet façade (the outcome will depend on the sound insulation provided by the closed window); and

once noise insulation, which includes alternative ventilation, is provided then the b.significant observed adverse effect is avoided.

9.1.7 The published guidance therefore confirms our submissions to the ExA on NPS noise policy (APP102.03, Appendix B, and APP157, Appendix A), the key matters being:

NPPG guides how the aims at NPS paragraph 4.9.9 should be interpreted. a.

The first aim relates to ‘significant observed adverse effects’ as defined by NPPG b.and NPSE (and not to any other definition of significant effect in the Environmental Statement (ES).

SOAELs are aligned with the trigger values for noise insulation (or other equivalent c.off-site mitigation).

Where on-site mitigation is exhausted, the provision of noise insulation avoids any d.residual significant observed adverse effects and, therefore, the first aim of NPS noise policy is met.

The second aim relates to ‘observed adverse effects’ and these occur when the e.noise exposure is between the lowest observed adverse effect level (LOAEL) and the SOAEL.

Page 8

Observed adverse effects have been assessed in the ES (against the A and B f.thresholds of the BS5228-1 ABC method) and, taking account of noise level, duration and number of dwellings affected, can be reported as a significant effect in the ES. These observed adverse effects primarily relate to change in the acoustic character of the area and do not cause ‘material change in behaviour and/or attitude’.

The Environmental Impact Assessment and Thames Water’s noise strategy has g.resulted in on-site mitigation being maximised. In maximising mitigation, the residual observed adverse effects are minimised and hence the second aim of NPS noise policy is met.

NPPG, like NPSE, is clear that avoiding significant observed adverse effects and h.minimising observed adverse effects (ie, the first and second aims of NPS noise policy) “must be made taking account of the economic and social benefit of the activity causing the noise”. In other words, there is a balance to be made and NPS noise policy should not therefore be applied in isolation.

Where residents elect to retain the off-site mitigation provided, it will reduce i.exposure to existing noise sources, thus improving their existing situation over the short and long term and meeting the third aim of NPS noise policy.

9.2 Delivery body

9.2.1 We wanted to draw attention to a couple of appointments we have made to the organisation which will eventually for, or be part of, the Infrastructure Provider (IP) which, as the ExA will be aware, will be the entity responsible for the delivery of the project.

9.2.2 In December 2013, we appointed Sir Neville Simms as Chairman. He is one the most experienced and distinguished figures in the UK infrastructure industry and will be a significant asset to the project when it enters the delivery phase.

9.2.3 In January 2014, we also appointed Andrew Mitchell as the Chief Executive Officer. Mr Mitchell is currently the Programme Director and Board Member at Crossrail and will report to Sir Neville Simms, and lead the development of the delivery company.

9.3 Secret Intelligence Services

9.3.1 At the hearing on 21 February 2014, the ExA expressed concern at the way that the project was referring to the Secret Intelligence Services.

9.3.2 The ExA has received confirmation that, following discussions with us, ‘Secret Intelligence Service’ (SIS) is the agreed terminology to be used within Schedule 3 of the draft final DCO. The ExA should note that the application documentation also includes references to “the occupiers of Vauxhall Cross” and “the occupiers of 85 Albert Embankment”.

10 Enclosed documents

10.1.1 As agreed, we enclose seven hard copies and eight DVDs containing the submitted material.

10.1.2 I trust you will find this information helpful. If any queries arise from the above, please do not hesitate to contact me or Ian Fletcher on 020 8792 5568 or ian.fletcher@thameswater.co.uk.

Page 9

11 Conclusion

11.1.1 Finally, I would like to thank the Planning Inspectorate staff and, in particular, Mark Wilson, Chris White and Rob Ranger for their advice and the helpful way in which they addressed our many queries. I would appreciate it if you could convey my thanks to them.

Yours faithfully

Phil Stride Head of Thames Tideway Tunnel

Page 10

Schedule 1: Documents submitted for 11 March 2014 deadline

PINS Doc Ref

Document Title

Our responses to representations from stakeholders

APP198.02 Response to the Andrew Whetnall 3 March 2014 Submission

APP198.03 Response to the Ann Rosenberg on behalf of Carnwath Road Coalition 3 March 2014 Submission

APP198.04 Response to the Anthony Alexander Arhaq Housing 3 March 2014 Submission

APP198.05 Response to the Brian Chadwick 3 March 2014 Submission

APP198.06 Response to the British Telecommunication Plc 3 March 2014 Submission

APP198.07 Response to the City of London 3 March 2014 Submission

APP198.08 Response to the City of Westminster and Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission for England (HBMCE) 3 March 2014 submission

APP198.09 Response to the Cory Environmental Holdings Ltd 3 March 2014 Submission

APP198.10 Response to the Councillor Anood Al-Samerai 3 March 2014 submission

APP198.11 Response to the David Starkie 3 March 2014 Submission

APP198.12 Response to the Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission for England (HBMCE) 3 March 2014 submission

APP198.13 Response to the Environment Agency 3 March 2014 Submission

APP198.14 Response to Eversheds on behalf of Luna House 3 March 2014 submission

APP198.15 Response to the Free Trade Wharf 3 March 2014 Submission

APP198.16 Response to the Hermitage Community Moorings 3 March 2014 submission

APP198.18 Response to the Larry Broomhead of Wrayburn Residents Together 3 March 2014 Submission

APP198.19 Response to the Livetts Launches 3 March 2014 Submission

APP198.20 Response to the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham 3 March 2014 submission

APP198.21 Response to the London Borough of Lambeth 3 March 2014

APP198.22 Response to the London Borough of Lewisham 3 March 2014 Submission

APP198.23 Response to the London Borough of Newham 3 March 2014 Submission

APP198.24 Response to the London Borough of Southwark 3 March 2014 Submission

APP198.25 Response to the London Borough of Tower Hamlets 3 March 2014 Submission

APP198.26 Response to the London Borough of Wandsworth 3 March 2014 Submission

APP198.27 Response to the London Duck Tours 3 March 2014 Submission

APP198.28 Response to the Marc Hearn 3 March 2014 Submission

APP198.29 Response to the Margarette Lincoln 3 March 2014 submission

Page 11

PINS Doc Ref

Document Title

APP198.30 Response to the Marine Management Organisation 3 March 2014 Submission

APP198.31 Response to the Mark and Mary Hale on behalf of Nine Elms Piers Ltd 3 March 2014 Submission

APP198.32 Response to the Port of London Authority 3 March 2014 Submission

APP198.33 Response to the Roland Gilmore 3 March 2014 Submission

APP198.34 Response to the Save Your Riverside 3 March 2014 Submission

APP198.35 Response to the St George 3 March 2014 submission

APP198.36 Response to the St James Group 3 March 2014 Submission

APP198.37 Response to the Sue Lawes on behalf of Crossfields TRA 3 March 2014 submission

APP198.38 Response to the Surrey Quays 3 March 2014 Submission

APP198.39 Response to the Thamesbank 3 March 2014 Submission

APP198.40 Response to the Mercers Company and St Paul's School 3 March 2014 Submission

APP198.41 Response to the Transport for London 3 March 2014 Submission

Guide to the application

APP199 Guide to the Application

Errata and clarifications

APP200 Errata

APP206.01 Design Principles – 11 March 2014

APP206.02 Design Principles – Comparite against 3 March 2014 (extract)

APP206.03 Design Principles – Comparite against 28 February 2013 (extract)

Section 127 and Section 128 Schedules

APP201 Section 127 Schedule

APP202 Section 138 Schedule

Application document consistency check

APP203.01 Mitigation Route Map

APP203.02 Mitigation Route Map Comparite against 3 March 2014

APP204.01

Drafting notes for The Draft Thames Water Utilities Limited (Thames Tideway Tunnel) Development Consent Order

APP204.02

The Draft Thames Water Utilities Limited (Thames Tideway Tunnel) Development Consent Order – Revised 11 March 2014

APP204.03

The Draft Thames Water Utilities Limited (Thames Tideway Tunnel) Development Consent Order – Comparite against 3 March 2014

APP204.04 The Draft Thames Water Utilities Limited (Thames Tideway Tunnel) Development Consent Order – Comparite against 28 February 2013

Page 12

PINS Doc Ref

Document Title

APP205.01 Code of Construction Practice Part A: General Requirements – 11 March 2014

APP205.02 Code of Construction Practice Part A: General Requirements Comparite against 3 March 2014

APP207.01 Drafting notes for River Transport Strategy

APP207.02 River Transport Strategy – Update 11 March 2014

APP207.03 River Transport Strategy – Comparite to 3 March 2014

APP208.01 Environmental Statement Update Report 11 March 2014

APP208.02 Environmental Statement Update Report Comparite with 3 March 2014

APP208.01.01 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables – Project-wide

APP208.01.02 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Updated Environmental Statement Vol 3 Project Wide Effects Assessment Section 14: Water Resources – Surface Water

APP208.01.03 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Sediment Fluxes in the Tidal Thames

APP208.01.04 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Scour and Accretion Strategy – Temporary and Permanent Works

APP208.01.05 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary of Changes Between Environmental Statement and the Environmental Statement Update Report

APP208.01.06 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – The Treatment of Operational Derogations in the Environmental Statement

APP208.01.07 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Acton Storm Tanks

APP208.01.08 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Hammersmith Pumping Station

APP208.01.09 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Barn Elms

APP208.01.10 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Putney Embankment Foreshore

APP208.01.11 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Dormay Street

APP208.01.12 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: King George’s Park

APP208.01.13 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Carnwath Road Riverside

APP208.01.14 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Falconbrook Pumping Station

Page 13

PINS Doc Ref

Document Title

APP208.01.15 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Cremorne Wharf Depot

APP208.01.16 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Chelsea Embankment Foreshore

APP208.01.17 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Kirtling Street

APP208.01.18 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Heathwall Pumping Station

APP208.01.19 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Albert Embankment Foreshore

APP208.01.20 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Victoria Embankment Foreshore

APP208.01.21 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Visualisations – Victoria Embankment Foreshore

APP208.01.22 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Victoria Embankment Foreshore Vessel Relocation

APP208.01.23 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Blackfriars Bridge Foreshore

APP208.01.24 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Blackfriars Bridge Foreshore Vessel Relocations

APP208.01.25 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Shad Thames Pumping Station

APP208.01.26 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Chambers Wharf

APP208.01.27 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: King Edward Memorial Park

APP208.01.28 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Earl Pumping Station

APP208.01.29 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Deptford Church Street

APP208.01.30 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Greenwich Pumping Station

APP208.01.31 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Abbey Mills Pumping Station

APP208.01.32 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Beckton Sewage Treatment Works

APP208.01.33 Environmental Statement Update Report Appendices – March 2014 – Summary Assessment Tables: Minor Works Site

Page 14

PINS Doc Ref

Document Title

APP210.01 Non-statutory Off-site Mitigation and Compensation Policy

APP210.02 Non-statutory Off-site Mitigation and Compensation Policy Comparite against 3 March 2014

APP213.01 Exceptional Hardship Procedure Update 11 March 2014

APP213.02 Exceptional Hardship Procedure Comparite against 3 March 2014

Update on legal agreements

APP209.01 Legal Agreement and Section 106 Unilateral Undertaking – Covering Note

APP 209.02 Legal Agreement and Section 106 Unilateral Undertaking – Drafting Notes

APP209.03 Legal Agreement for Securing of Off-site Mitigation Policies and Resources for Local Planning Authorities

APP209.06 Letters to local planning authorities

Update on Statements of Common Ground and Position Statements

APP214.03 Position Statement Cannon Wharf

APP215.01 Update on Statement of Common Ground Transport for London

APP215.02 Update on Statement of Common Ground Port of London Authority

APP215.03 Update on Statement of Common Ground Environment Agency

APP215.04 Update on Statement of Common Ground British Telecommunications Plc

APP215.05 Update on Statement of Common Ground Cory Environmental

APP216 City of London Asset Protection Letter

Pag

e 1

5

Sch

ed

ule

2: U

pd

ate

on

mat

ters

pro

gres

sed

an

d y

et t

o b

e r

eso

lve

d

1.1

.1

Sch

edu

le 2

pro

vid

es a

n u

pd

ate

on

ho

w m

atte

rs i

den

tifi

ed a

s n

ot

yet

reso

lved

in

3 M

arch

20

14

co

ver

lett

er h

ave

pro

gres

sed

. I

n r

evie

win

g Sc

hed

ule

2, t

he

follo

win

g p

oin

ts s

ho

uld

be

no

ted

:

Th

e sc

hed

ule

co

nta

ins

up

dat

es, w

her

e ap

pro

pri

ate,

on

Sta

tem

ents

of

Co

mm

on

Gro

un

d (

SoC

G)

and

Po

siti

on

Sta

tem

ents

wit

h v

ario

us

a.p

arti

es.

W

her

e re

fere

nce

is m

ade

to t

he

dra

ft f

inal

DC

O in

th

e 3

Mar

ch 2

01

4 c

olu

mn

, th

is c

an f

ou

nd

at

AP

P1

77

.02

. b

. Th

e sc

hed

ule

has

bee

n u

pd

ated

to

incl

ud

e A

ffec

ted

Per

son

s. W

her

e m

atte

rs r

emai

n a

s d

ocu

men

ted

in o

ur

resp

on

se t

o q

ues

tio

n R

58

.2

c.(A

PP

168

), t

he

nam

ed p

arty

is n

ot

incl

ud

ed in

th

is s

ched

ule

exc

ept

wh

ere

the

ExA

sp

ecif

ical

ly r

eq

uir

ed in

form

atio

n a

t th

e fi

nal

ro

un

d o

f co

mp

uls

ory

acq

uis

itio

n h

eari

ngs

. W

her

e m

atte

rs h

ave

pro

gres

sed

sin

ce o

ur

sub

mis

sio

n f

or

the

3 M

arch

20

14

dea

dlin

e, A

ffec

ted

Per

son

s ar

e in

clu

ded

in t

he

sch

edu

le.

Wh

en r

ead

ing

en

trie

s re

lati

ng

to A

ffec

ted

Per

son

s, t

he

follo

win

g sh

ou

ld b

e n

ote

d.

The

stat

us

for

the

3 M

arch

2

014

co

lum

n is

bas

ed o

n o

ur

resp

on

ses

to q

ues

tio

n R

58

.2.

Wh

ere

an A

ffec

ted

Per

son

is a

lso

list

ed in

an

ear

lier

entr

y in

th

e sc

hed

ule

, th

ey

are

no

t re

pea

ted

in t

he

Aff

ecte

d P

erso

ns

sect

ion

of

the

sch

edu

le (

row

no

. 45

an

d b

elo

w).

No

. O

rgan

isat

ion

St

atu

s as

ref

lect

ed

in s

ub

mis

sio

ns

mad

e f

or

3 M

arch

20

14

d

ead

line

U

pd

ate

d s

tatu

s as

of

11

Mar

ch 2

01

4

Stat

uto

ry u

nd

erta

kers

an

d C

om

mu

nic

atio

n C

od

e P

rovi

de

rs

1

Tr

ansp

ort

fo

r Lo

nd

on

A

n u

nsi

gned

up

dat

e re

po

rt t

o t

he

SoC

G w

as s

ub

mit

ted

(D

oc

ref:

AP

P1

59.0

3).

A s

epar

ate

sign

ed P

osi

tio

n S

tate

men

t w

ith

an

agr

eed

set

of

pro

tect

ive

pro

visi

on

s w

as s

ub

mit

ted

by

Tran

spo

rt f

or

Lon

do

n o

n 3

Mar

ch 2

014

.

Wo

rk is

co

nti

nu

ing

bet

we

en t

he

par

ties

to

pro

gres

s th

e O

vera

rch

ing

Fram

ewo

rk A

gree

men

t.

The

Pro

per

ty H

ead

s o

f Te

rms

are

bei

ng

dis

cuss

ed b

etw

een

th

e p

arti

es.

Sign

ed u

pd

ate

re

po

rt t

o t

he

SoC

G (

Do

c re

f: A

PP

21

5.0

1)

con

tain

ed w

ith

in t

his

su

bm

issi

on

pro

vid

es a

su

mm

ary

of

agre

ed a

nd

ou

tsta

nd

ing

mat

ters

.

Dis

cuss

ion

s ar

e co

nti

nu

ing

to c

on

clu

de

the

Ove

rarc

hin

g Fr

amew

ork

Agr

eem

ent

and

Pro

per

ty H

ead

s o

f Te

rms.

Th

e p

arti

es a

gree

th

at t

hes

e sh

ou

ld b

e co

mp

lete

d in

th

e ve

ry n

ear

futu

re.

2

N

etw

ork

Rai

l In

terf

ace

agre

emen

t an

d A

sset

Pro

tect

ion

Agr

eem

ent

agre

ed.

Agr

eed

set

of

pro

tect

ive

pro

visi

on

s (c

on

tain

ed in

dra

ft f

inal

D

CO

).

Agr

eem

ents

co

mp

lete

d.

Rep

rese

nta

tio

n w

ith

dra

wn

wit

h t

he

exce

pti

on

of

ob

ject

ion

to

A

rtic

le 5

2 (

Safe

guar

din

g) in

a le

tte

r to

th

e Ex

A d

ated

7 M

arch

2

01

4.

Pag

e 1

6

No

. O

rgan

isat

ion

St

atu

s as

ref

lect

ed

in s

ub

mis

sio

ns

mad

e f

or

3 M

arch

20

14

d

ead

line

U

pd

ate

d s

tatu

s as

of

11

Mar

ch 2

01

4

An

up

dat

e re

po

rt t

o t

he

SoC

G, w

hic

h w

as s

ign

ed b

y b

oth

p

arti

es w

as s

ub

mit

ted

(D

oc

ref:

AP

P1

59

.04

).

Pro

per

ty H

ead

s o

f Te

rms

agre

ed.

3

P

ort

of

Lon

do

n

Au

tho

rity

A

gree

d s

et o

f p

rote

ctiv

e p

rovi

sio

ns

(co

nta

ined

in d

raft

fin

al

DC

O).

An

un

sign

ed u

pd

ate

rep

ort

to

th

e So

CG

was

su

bm

itte

d

(Do

c re

f: A

PP

159

.05

).

Sign

ed le

gal a

gree

men

t w

ith

th

e ri

ver

regu

lato

rs (

Do

c re

f:

AP

P1

83).

Sign

ed u

pd

ate

re

po

rt t

o t

he

SoC

G d

ate

d 1

0 M

arch

20

14

(D

oc

ref:

AP

P2

15

.02

) co

nta

ined

wit

hin

th

is s

ub

mis

sio

n p

rovi

des

a

sum

mar

y o

f ag

ree

d a

nd

ou

tsta

nd

ing

mat

ters

.

Rep

rese

nta

tio

n w

ith

dra

wn

in le

tter

to

th

e Ex

A d

ate

d

10

Mar

ch 2

01

4.

The

info

rmat

ion

co

nta

ined

in t

he

Sect

ion

12

7 a

nd

Sec

tio

n 1

38

sc

hed

ule

s su

bm

itte

d f

or

11

Mar

ch 2

01

4 d

ead

line

(D

oc

refs

: A

PP

20

1 a

nd

AP

P2

02

) is

agr

eed

. H

ow

ever

, du

e to

th

e p

rin

t d

ead

lines

th

e w

ith

dra

wal

of

the

ob

ject

ion

by

the

PLA

has

no

t b

een

ref

lect

ed in

th

e u

pd

ated

sch

edu

les

bu

t w

ill b

e re

flec

ted

in

th

e u

pd

ate

s to

be

pro

vid

ed t

o t

he

SoS

for

Tran

spo

rt.

The

ExA

sh

ou

ld t

her

efo

re n

ote

th

at c

erti

fica

tio

n u

nd

er S

ecti

on

1

27

an

d t

he

con

sen

t o

f th

e So

S fo

r Tr

ansp

ort

un

der

Sec

tio

n

13

8 is

no

lon

ger

req

uir

ed.

4

M

arin

e M

anag

emen

t O

rgan

isat

ion

A

gree

d D

eem

ed M

arin

e Li

cen

ce (

con

tain

ed in

dra

ft f

inal

D

CO

).

An

up

dat

e re

po

rt s

ign

ed b

y Th

ames

Wat

er

was

su

bm

itte

d

(Do

c re

f: A

PP

159

.06

). T

he

Mar

ine

Man

agem

ent

Org

anis

atio

n t

hen

su

bm

itte

d t

he

up

dat

e re

po

rt s

ign

ed b

y b

oth

par

ties

.

Sign

ed le

gal a

gree

men

t w

ith

th

e ri

ver

regu

lato

rs (

Do

c re

f:

AP

P1

83).

Thro

ugh

th

e p

rovi

sio

n o

f th

e So

CG

sig

ned

by

bo

th p

arti

es o

n

3 M

arch

20

14

to

geth

er w

ith

th

e si

gned

lega

l agr

eem

ent

wit

h

the

rive

r re

gula

tors

(D

oc

ref:

AP

P1

83

), M

MO

has

co

nfi

rmed

th

at t

he

dee

med

mar

ine

licen

ce is

in a

gree

d f

orm

an

d t

hat

all

ou

tsta

nd

ing

mat

ters

rai

sed

by

the

MM

O in

co

nn

ecti

on

wit

h

the

DC

O h

ave

bee

n r

eso

lved

to

th

eir

sati

sfac

tio

n.

The

MM

O

exp

lain

ed t

o u

s o

n 5

Mar

ch, t

hat

th

ey h

ave

no

t m

ain

tain

ed

any

ob

ject

ion

s d

uri

ng

the

exam

inat

ion

an

d, a

cco

rdin

gly,

fe

lt

ther

e w

as n

oth

ing

for

them

to

wit

hd

raw

.

We

no

te t

hat

th

e M

MO

’s f

inal

po

siti

on

is s

et o

ut

in it

s le

tter

o

f 1

1 M

arch

20

14

.

5

En

viro

nm

ent

Age

ncy

A

gree

d s

et o

f p

rote

ctiv

e p

rovi

sio

ns

(co

nta

ined

in d

raft

fin

al

The

SoC

G h

as b

een

sig

ned

by

bo

th p

arti

es.

A c

op

y is

att

ach

ed

Pag

e 1

7

No

. O

rgan

isat

ion

St

atu

s as

ref

lect

ed

in s

ub

mis

sio

ns

mad

e f

or

3 M

arch

20

14

d

ead

line

U

pd

ate

d s

tatu

s as

of

11

Mar

ch 2

01

4

DC

O).

An

un

sign

ed S

oC

G w

as s

ub

mit

ted

(D

oc

ref:

AP

P1

59

.09

).

Sign

ed le

gal a

gree

men

t w

ith

th

e ri

ver

regu

lato

rs (

Do

c re

f:

AP

P1

83).

Pro

per

ty r

elat

ed H

ead

s o

f Te

rms

are

agre

ed

in p

rin

cip

le.

Form

al a

gree

men

t fr

om

Lo

nd

on

Bo

rou

gh o

f W

and

swo

rth

to

acc

ess

at

Bar

n E

lms

awai

ted

an

d is

th

e o

nly

ou

tsta

nd

ing

issu

e.

(Do

c re

f: A

PP

21

5.0

3).

6

N

atio

nal

Gri

d

Agr

eed

set

of

pro

tect

ive

pro

visi

on

s (c

on

tain

ed in

dra

ft f

inal

D

CO

).

Co

mp

lete

d A

sset

Pro

tect

ion

Agr

eem

ent.

Rep

rese

nta

tio

n w

ith

dra

wn

in le

tte

r to

th

e Ex

A d

ate

d 6

Mar

ch

20

14

.

7

U

K P

ow

er

Net

wo

rks

(Lo

nd

on

Po

we

r N

etw

ork

s)

Agr

eed

set

of

pro

tect

ive

pro

visi

on

s (c

on

tain

ed in

dra

ft f

inal

D

CO

).

Co

mp

lete

d A

sset

Pro

tect

ion

Agr

eem

ent.

Co

nfi

rmat

ion

pro

vid

ed in

lett

er t

o E

xA d

ated

28

Feb

ruar

y 2

01

4 t

hat

th

e as

set

pro

tect

ion

agr

eem

ent

has

bee

n

com

ple

ted

an

d t

he

pro

tect

ive

pro

visi

on

s ar

e ag

ree

d.

No

re

leva

nt

rep

rese

nta

tio

n w

as m

ade

by

UK

Po

we

r N

etw

ork

s.

8

B

riti

sh

Tele

com

mu

nic

atio

ns

Plc

Pro

tect

ive

pro

visi

on

s (c

on

tain

ed in

dra

ft f

inal

DC

O)

inco

rpo

rati

ng

com

men

ts f

rom

sta

keh

old

ers.

Ass

et P

rote

ctio

n A

gree

men

t is

bei

ng

pro

gres

sed

by

bo

th

par

ties

.

An

un

sign

ed u

pd

ate

rep

ort

to

th

e So

CG

was

su

bm

itte

d

(Do

c re

f: A

PP

159

.07

) an

d a

sig

ned

ver

sio

n w

as s

ub

mit

ted

to

th

e Ex

A b

y B

T fo

r th

e 12

Feb

ruar

y 2

01

4 d

ead

line.

Bo

th p

arti

es w

ere

wo

rkin

g to

pro

vid

e a

sign

ed u

pd

ate

rep

ort

to

th

e So

CG

, ho

wev

er, a

s in

dic

ated

in A

PP

21

5.0

4, t

his

has

no

t b

een

po

ssib

le.

Bo

th p

arti

es a

re c

on

tin

uin

g to

pro

gres

s th

e A

sset

Pro

tect

ion

A

gree

men

t an

d B

T h

as in

dic

ate

d t

hat

th

ey a

nti

cip

ate

it

sho

uld

be

sign

ed b

y e

nd

of

Mar

ch 2

01

4 o

r sh

ort

ly t

her

eaft

er.

9

V

od

afo

ne

Lim

ited

P

rote

ctiv

e p

rovi

sio

ns

(co

nta

ined

in d

raft

fin

al D

CO

) in

corp

ora

tin

g co

mm

ents

fro

m s

take

ho

lder

s.

Sign

ed S

oC

G w

as s

ub

mit

ted

to

th

e Ex

A b

y V

od

afo

ne

Lim

ited

o

n 1

1 M

arch

20

14

.

10

So

uth

ern

Gas

P

rote

ctiv

e p

rovi

sio

ns

(co

nta

ined

in d

raft

fin

al D

CO

) n

ot

ob

ject

ed t

o.

No

fu

rth

er u

pd

ate.

11

V

irgi

n M

edia

A

gree

d s

et o

f p

rote

ctiv

e p

rovi

sio

ns

(co

nta

ined

in d

raft

fin

al

No

fu

rth

er u

pd

ate

.

Pag

e 1

8

No

. O

rgan

isat

ion

St

atu

s as

ref

lect

ed

in s

ub

mis

sio

ns

mad

e f

or

3 M

arch

20

14

d

ead

line

U

pd

ate

d s

tatu

s as

of

11

Mar

ch 2

01

4

DC

O)

as c

on

firm

ed in

an

em

ail t

o t

he

Pla

nn

ing

Insp

ecto

rate

d

ated

27

Feb

ruar

y 2

014

.

12

C

olt

P

rote

ctiv

e p

rovi

sio

ns

(co

nta

ined

in d

raft

fin

al D

CO

) n

ot

ob

ject

ed t

o.

No

fu

rth

er u

pd

ate.

13

Le

vel 3

P

rote

ctiv

e p

rovi

sio

ns

(co

nta

ined

in d

raft

fin

al D

CO

) h

ave

b

een

dis

cuss

ed b

y b

oth

par

ties

. N

o f

urt

her

up

dat

e.

14

C

anal

& R

iver

Tru

st

Agr

eem

ents

in f

inal

fo

rm, s

ub

ject

to

go

vern

ance

.

Sign

ed S

oC

G s

ub

mit

ted

on

12

Feb

ruar

y 2

01

4 (

Do

c re

f:

AP

P1

16.2

2)

ind

icat

es n

o o

uts

tan

din

g m

atte

rs, i

e,

agre

emen

t h

as b

een

rea

ched

.

Agr

eem

ents

co

mp

lete

d.

Rep

rese

nta

tio

n w

ith

dra

wn

in le

tte

r to

th

e Ex

A d

ate

d 7

Mar

ch

20

14

.

15

Sou

th L

on

do

n a

nd

M

aud

sley

NH

S Fo

un

dat

ion

Tru

st

Sett

lem

ent

dee

d o

ffer

ed.

The

Tru

st h

as r

equ

este

d t

hat

th

is

be

pro

gres

sed

, in

th

e fu

ture

, pri

or

to c

on

stru

ctio

n.

N

o f

urt

her

up

dat

e.

Cro

wn

16

C

row

n E

stat

e La

nd

agr

eem

ent

com

ple

ted

.

Sect

ion

13

5 c

on

sen

t se

cure

d (

Do

c re

f: A

PP

17

4).

No

fu

rth

er u

pd

ate.

17

6 D

uch

y o

f C

orn

wal

l La

nd

agr

eem

ent

con

trac

ts e

xch

ange

d.

Sect

ion

13

5 c

on

sen

t se

cure

d (

Do

c re

f: A

PP

17

5).

No

fu

rth

er u

pd

ate.

18

D

epar

tmen

t o

f W

ork

an

d P

ensi

on

s La

nd

agr

eem

ent

com

ple

ted

.

Sect

ion

13

5 c

on

sen

t se

cure

d (

Do

c re

f: A

PP

12

1.0

2).

No

fu

rth

er

up

dat

e.

19

Fo

reig

n a

nd

C

om

mo

nw

ealt

h O

ffic

e Se

ctio

n 1

35

co

nse

nt

secu

red

as

set

ou

t in

a le

tter

dat

ed

3 M

arch

su

bm

itte

d b

y th

e Fo

reig

n a

nd

Co

mm

on

wea

lth

O

ffic

e to

th

e Ex

A.

No

fu

rth

er u

pd

ate.

Oth

er s

take

ho

lder

s

20

St

Pau

l’s, D

eptf

ord

A

sset

Pro

tect

ion

Agr

eem

ent

com

ple

ted

. N

o f

urt

her

up

dat

e si

nce

all

mat

ters

res

olv

ed

an

d

Pag

e 1

9

No

. O

rgan

isat

ion

St

atu

s as

ref

lect

ed

in s

ub

mis

sio

ns

mad

e f

or

3 M

arch

20

14

d

ead

line

U

pd

ate

d s

tatu

s as

of

11

Mar

ch 2

01

4

Form

al w

ith

dra

wal

of

rep

rese

nta

tio

n b

y th

e D

ioce

se o

f So

uth

war

k se

nt

to E

xA in

lett

er d

ate

d 2

8 F

ebru

ary

20

14

. re

pre

sen

tati

on

wit

hd

raw

n.

21

St

Mar

y’s

Pu

tney

A

sset

Pro

tect

ion

Agr

eem

ent

bei

ng

neg

oti

ate

d.

Agr

eem

ent

in p

rin

cip

le h

as b

een

rea

ched

by

bo

th p

arti

es.

It is

an

tici

pat

ed t

hat

th

e re

pre

sen

tati

on

will

be

wit

hd

raw

n

pri

or

to t

he

clo

se o

f th

e ex

amin

atio

n.

22

St

Lu

ke’s

, Dep

tfo

rd

Sett

lem

ent

Dee

d s

ent.

No

res

po

nse

re

ceiv

ed.

No

fu

rth

er u

pd

ate.

23

A

ll Sa

ints

, W

and

swo

rth

Se

ttle

men

t D

eed

sen

t.

Rep

rese

nta

tio

n w

ith

dra

wn

11

Mar

ch 2

01

4.

24

Se

cret

Inte

llige

nce

Se

rvic

e A

me

nd

ed r

equ

irem

ents

dis

cuss

ed w

ith

th

e Se

cret

In

telli

gen

ce S

ervi

ce.

The

Secr

et In

telli

gen

ce S

ervi

ce t

o a

dvi

se E

xA o

n t

he

pro

po

sed

dra

ft r

equ

irem

ents

.

Co

nfi

rmat

ion

se

nt

to t

he

ExA

th

at t

he

use

of

‘Sec

ret

Inte

llige

nce

Ser

vice

(SI

S)’ w

ith

in S

ched

ule

3 o

f th

e d

raft

fin

al

DC

O is

th

e a

gree

d t

erm

ino

logy

to

be

use

d.

25

C

ory

En

viro

nm

enta

l H

old

ings

Ltd

D

raft

Hea

ds

of

Term

s b

ein

g d

iscu

ssed

.

Fin

al S

oC

G s

ign

ed b

y Th

ames

Wat

er

sub

mit

ted

(D

oc

ref:

A

PP

159

.08

). I

n a

lett

er

to t

he

ExA

dat

ed 3

Mar

ch 2

01

4,

Co

ry E

nvi

ron

men

tal H

old

ings

Ltd

ad

vise

d t

hat

th

ey

rem

ain

ed u

nab

le t

o s

ign

th

e So

CG

.

Co

ry h

as o

uts

tan

din

g is

sues

wit

h t

he

Hea

ds

of

Term

s,

wh

ich

we

are

con

tin

uin

g to

neg

oti

ate

.

Dis

cuss

ion

s ar

e co

nti

nu

ing

on

Hea

ds

of

Term

s.

An

So

CG

sig

ned

by

Tham

es W

ater

was

su

bm

itte

d o

n 3

Mar

ch

20

14

(D

oc

ref:

AP

P1

59

.08

). W

e u

nd

erst

and

th

at C

ory

has

co

un

ters

ign

ed

th

e 3

Mar

ch 2

01

4 v

ersi

on

of

the

SoC

G a

nd

su

bm

itte

d it

to

th

e Ex

A f

or

11

Mar

ch 2

01

4 d

ead

line

.

26

W

este

rn R

iver

sid

e W

aste

Au

tho

rity

D

iscu

ssio

ns

hel

d.

Follo

win

g fu

rth

er r

ece

nt

dis

cuss

ion

s, H

ead

s o

f Te

rms

to b

e p

rogr

esse

d.

Pag

e 2

0

No

. O

rgan

isat

ion

St

atu

s as

ref

lect

ed

in s

ub

mis

sio

ns

mad

e f

or

3 M

arch

20

14

d

ead

line

U

pd

ate

d s

tatu

s as

of

11

Mar

ch 2

01

4

27

M

iner

va W

and

swo

rth

Lt

d

SoC

G s

ign

ed b

y b

oth

par

ties

.

Agr

eem

ent

com

ple

ted

in p

rin

cip

le.

Agr

eem

ent

sign

ed b

y b

oth

par

ties

. Th

e si

gnin

g o

f th

is

agre

emen

t n

egat

es t

he

nee

d f

or

the

pro

po

sed

Req

uir

emen

t co

nta

ined

at

par

a. 1

.11

.12

of

ou

r re

spo

nse

to

qu

esti

on

R5

8.1

(A

PP

16

8).

Rep

rese

nta

tio

n d

ue

to b

e w

ith

dra

wn

pri

or

to t

he

clo

se o

f th

e ex

amin

atio

n, a

s ag

reed

wit

h M

iner

va.

28

Su

rrey

Qu

ays

Ltd

A

gree

men

t st

ill b

ein

g d

iscu

ssed

. B

oth

par

ties

are

co

nti

nu

ing

to w

ork

to

war

ds

com

ple

tin

g an

ag

reem

ent.

29

C

ann

on

Wh

arf

LLP

H

ead

s o

f Te

rms

are

bei

ng

dra

fte

d f

or

an a

gree

men

t.

Co

mp

leti

on

of

the

agre

emen

t w

ill in

clu

de

wit

hd

raw

al o

f th

e tw

o r

epre

sen

tati

on

s m

ade

on

beh

alf

of

this

par

ty

wh

ich

sh

ou

ld o

ccu

r b

efo

re t

he

en

d o

f M

arch

.

Agr

eem

ent

in p

rin

cip

le r

eac

hed

.

Po

siti

on

Sta

tem

ent

sign

ed b

y b

oth

par

ties

(D

oc

ref:

A

PP

21

4.0

3).

Th

e re

pre

sen

tati

on

is a

nti

cip

ate

d t

o b

e w

ith

dra

wn

pri

or

to t

he

clo

se o

f th

e ex

amin

atio

n, a

s d

iscu

ssed

w

ith

Can

no

n W

har

f LL

P.

30

Fr

ee T

rad

e W

har

f M

anag

emen

t C

om

pan

y Lt

d

The

sco

pe

and

ext

ent

of

an A

sset

Pro

tect

ion

Agr

eem

ent

had

bee

n a

gree

d.

Agr

eem

ent

com

ple

ted

.

Rep

rese

nta

tio

n p

arti

ally

wit

hd

raw

n in

lett

er

to t

he

ExA

dat

ed

5

Mar

ch 2

01

4 in

rel

atio

n t

o t

he

New

cast

le J

etty

an

d

sett

lem

ent.

31

B

riti

sh G

rove

Stu

dio

s A

gree

men

t b

ein

g d

iscu

ssed

. A

gree

men

t b

ein

g d

iscu

ssed

.

32

Lo

nd

on

Du

ck T

ou

rs

Hea

ds

of

Term

s fo

r A

gree

men

t su

bm

itte

d b

ut

un

able

to

re

ach

agr

eem

ent

on

co

mm

erci

al t

erm

s.

Two

So

CG

sig

ned

an

d s

ub

mit

ted

on

12

Feb

ruar

y 2

01

4 (

Do

c re

f: A

PP

116

.30

an

d S

oC

G s

ub

mit

ted

by

the

Po

rt o

f Lo

nd

on

A

uth

ori

ty).

No

fu

rth

er u

pd

ate

.

33

C

EMEX

UK

Op

erat

ion

s Lt

d

Ass

et P

rote

ctio

n A

gree

men

t an

d L

and

agr

eem

ent

Hea

ds

of

Term

s d

iscu

ssed

.

No

fu

rth

er u

pd

ate

.

Pag

e 2

1

No

. O

rgan

isat

ion

St

atu

s as

ref

lect

ed

in s

ub

mis

sio

ns

mad

e f

or

3 M

arch

20

14

d

ead

line

U

pd

ate

d s

tatu

s as

of

11

Mar

ch 2

01

4

34

R

oya

l Ho

spit

al C

hel

sea

Pro

per

ty H

ead

s o

f Te

rms

clo

se t

o a

gree

men

t.

Sign

ed H

ead

s o

f Te

rms.

Hea

ds

of

Term

s n

ow

bei

ng

pro

gres

sed

into

fu

ll ag

reem

ent.

35

B

atte

rsea

Pro

ject

Lan

d

Co

mp

any

Lim

ite

d

Lan

d a

gree

men

t H

ead

s o

f Te

rms

agre

ed

, an

d c

on

trac

ts

bei

ng

neg

oti

ate

d.

Targ

et c

om

ple

tio

n d

ate

late

Mar

ch/e

arly

A

pri

l 201

4.

No

fu

rth

er u

pd

ate

.

36

C

hri

sto

ph

er P

oll

Ass

et P

rote

ctio

n A

gree

men

t o

ffer

ed a

nd

dis

cuss

ion

s st

ill

con

tin

uin

g.

Agr

eem

ent

com

ple

ted

.

Rep

rese

nta

tio

n p

arti

ally

wit

hd

raw

n in

lett

er

to t

he

ExA

dat

ed

7

Mar

ch 2

01

4 in

rel

atio

n t

o a

sse

t p

rote

ctio

n.

37

N

erit

a P

rop

erti

es L

td

Agr

eem

ent

com

ple

ted

.

Form

al p

arti

al w

ith

dra

wal

of

rep

rese

nta

tio

n c

on

firm

ed b

y le

tter

to

th

e Ex

A d

ate

d 6

Feb

ruar

y 2

01

4.

Thei

r o

bje

ctio

n t

o

imp

acts

fro

m c

on

stru

ctio

n (

traf

fic,

no

ise,

vib

rati

on

, du

st,

soci

o-e

con

om

ic e

ffec

ts a

nd

cu

mu

lati

ve e

ffec

ts)

still

re

mai

ns

and

will

no

t b

e w

ith

dra

wn

pri

or

to t

he

clo

se o

f th

e ex

amin

atio

n.

No

fu

rth

er u

pd

ate

.

38

R

oya

l Mai

l Plc

A

gree

men

t co

mp

lete

d.

Form

al w

ith

dra

wal

of

rep

rese

nta

tio

n p

rovi

ded

to

ExA

in a

le

tter

dat

ed 6

Feb

ruar

y 2

014

.

No

fu

rth

er u

pd

ate

sin

ce a

ll m

atte

rs r

eso

lve

d a

nd

re

pre

sen

tati

on

wit

hd

raw

n.

39

St

Jam

es G

rou

p

Hea

ds

of

Term

s cl

ose

to

bei

ng

fin

alis

ed.

No

fu

rth

er u

pd

ate.

Loca

l au

tho

riti

es

40

C

ity

of

Lon

do

n

Pro

tect

ive

pro

visi

on

s ar

e b

ein

g d

iscu

ssed

by

bo

th p

arti

es.

Tho

se c

on

tain

ed in

th

e d

raft

fin

al D

CO

are

agr

eed

, wit

h

on

e ex

cep

tio

n.

Lan

d a

gree

men

t H

ead

s o

f Te

rms

bei

ng

dis

cuss

ed b

y b

oth

p

arti

es.

Sign

ed J

oin

t St

atem

ent

on

pro

tect

ive

pro

visi

on

s is

en

clo

sed

at

AP

P2

16

.

Pro

per

ty a

gree

men

t b

ein

g p

rogr

esse

d.

It is

an

tici

pat

ed t

hat

th

is w

ill b

e co

mp

lete

d b

y Se

pte

mb

er 2

01

4.

41

Lo

nd

on

Bo

rou

gh o

f A

gree

d P

rop

erty

Hea

ds

of

Term

s.

Pro

per

ty H

ead

s o

f te

rms

agre

ed a

nd

sig

ned

.

Pag

e 2

2

No

. O

rgan

isat

ion

St

atu

s as

ref

lect

ed

in s

ub

mis

sio

ns

mad

e f

or

3 M

arch

20

14

d

ead

line

U

pd

ate

d s

tatu

s as

of

11

Mar

ch 2

01

4

Wan

dsw

ort

h

42

Lo

nd

on

Bo

rou

gh o

f Le

wis

ham

Th

ere

has

bee

n n

o p

rogr

ess

on

ter

ms

for

the

pro

per

ty

agre

emen

t.

Sect

ion

10

6 a

gree

men

t ex

ecu

ted

an

d c

om

ple

ted

(D

oc

ref:

A

PP

119

.13

).

Mee

tin

g to

be

arra

nge

d w

ith

LB

Lew

ish

am e

stat

es

surv

eyo

r d

uri

ng

Mar

ch 2

01

4.

43

Lo

nd

on

Bo

rou

gh o

f H

amm

ersm

ith

an

d

Fulh

am

Pro

per

ty H

ead

s o

f Te

rms

agre

ed a

nd

lega

l du

e d

ilige

nce

p

rogr

essi

ng.

Co

ntr

act

do

cum

enta

tio

n is

sti

ll aw

aite

d, w

ith

ex

chan

ge n

ow

an

tici

pat

ed in

Ap

ril/

May

20

14

. Th

e re

pre

sen

tati

on

s w

ill t

her

efo

re n

ot

be

wit

hd

raw

n.

No

fu

rth

er u

pd

ate.

44

Lo

nd

on

Bo

rou

gh o

f To

wer

Ham

lets

Th

ere

has

bee

n n

o p

rogr

ess

on

ter

ms

for

the

pro

per

ty

agre

emen

t.

Sect

ion

10

6 a

gree

men

t e

xecu

ted

an

d c

om

ple

ted

(D

oc

ref:

A

PP

119

.15

).

No

fu

rth

er u

pd

ate.

Aff

ect

ed

Per

son

s

45

C

apit

alst

art

Ltd

Fo

llow

ing

a co

nst

ruct

ive

mee

tin

g d

uri

ng

wh

ich

we

d

iscu

ssed

th

e re

vise

d N

on

-sta

tuto

ry O

ff-s

ite

Mit

iga

tion

an

d

Co

mp

ensa

tio

n P

olic

y. T

her

e is

co

nfi

den

ce t

hat

th

is w

ill b

e fi

t fo

r p

urp

ose

an

d t

her

e is

a c

om

mit

men

t to

pu

t in

pla

ce

an a

gree

men

t p

rio

r to

co

mm

ence

men

t o

f th

e co

nst

ruct

ion

w

ork

s at

Pu

tney

Em

ban

kmen

t Fo

resh

ore

.

No

fu

rth

er u

pd

ate.

46

Ia

n H

ud

son

Em

ail r

esp

on

se r

ecei

ved

fro

m D

r H

ud

son

, on

4 F

ebru

ary

201

4, i

n w

hic

h h

e co

nti

nu

es t

o q

ues

tio

n t

he

nee

d f

or

tem

po

rary

use

of

his

par

kin

g sp

ace.

He

ackn

ow

led

ges

ou

r p

rop

osa

l fo

r al

tern

ativ

e p

rovi

sio

n w

ou

ld b

e lo

gica

l if

he

was

co

nvi

nce

d o

f th

e n

eed

fo

r u

se o

f h

is s

pac

e.

No

fu

rth

er u

pd

ate.

47

G

rah

am G

rou

p L

imit

ed

an

d J

ewso

n L

imit

ed

Dis

cuss

ion

s w

ith

Jew

son

s Li

mit

ed a

re o

ngo

ing.

We

acc

ept

that

co

mp

ensa

tio

n f

or

bu

sin

ess

dis

turb

ance

will

be

pay

able

N

o f

urt

her

up

dat

e.

Pag

e 2

3

No

. O

rgan

isat

ion

St

atu

s as

ref

lect

ed

in s

ub

mis

sio

ns

mad

e f

or

3 M

arch

20

14

d

ead

line

U

pd

ate

d s

tatu

s as

of

11

Mar

ch 2

01

4

as d

isp

lace

men

t fr

om

th

e p

rop

erty

will

be,

in e

ffec

t,

per

man

ent,

tak

ing

acco

un

t o

f th

e la

nd

ow

ner

s’ a

spir

atio

ns

to r

edev

elo

p t

he

site

.

48

H

allia

rd P

rop

erty

C

om

pan

y Li

mit

ed

Fr

eeh

old

er o

f P

ho

enix

Wh

arf

at G

ree

nw

ich

. D

raft

Hea

ds

of

Term

s fo

r p

rop

erty

agr

eem

ent

sub

mit

ted

. G

en

eral

ag

reem

ent

in p

rin

cip

le o

n le

ase

du

rin

g co

nst

ruct

ion

, bu

t sp

ecif

ic t

erm

s st

ill t

o b

e ag

ree

d, m

ain

ly a

rou

nd

leve

l of

ren

t an

d c

om

pen

sati

on

rel

atin

g to

def

erre

d r

edev

elo

pm

ent

of

the

site

.

No

fu

rth

er u

pd

ate.

49

Li

vett

’s L

aun

ches

Ltd

Si

nce

13

Jan

uar

y 2

014

, th

ere

hav

e b

een

fe

w e

xch

ange

s w

ith

Ch

ris

Live

tts.

Th

ere

was

an

off

er t

o p

ut

toge

ther

a

SoC

G b

ut

the

con

dit

ion

s at

tach

ed t

o t

his

wer

e n

ot

acce

pta

ble

to

Th

ames

Wat

er a

nd

wo

uld

hav

e re

qu

ired

co

mm

itm

ents

in r

esp

ect

of

mat

ters

ou

tsid

e th

e lim

its

of

lan

d t

o b

e ac

qu

ired

or

use

d.

Thes

e is

sues

are

we

ll d

ocu

men

ted

in t

he

wri

tte

n

rep

rese

nta

tio

ns

sub

mit

ted

to

th

e Ex

A (

AP

P3

1.2

1)

and

as

exp

lain

ed a

t th

e h

eari

ngs

, we

no

w a

nti

cip

ate

the

rep

rese

nta

tio

ns

fro

m C

hri

s Li

vett

will

rem

ain

wit

h n

o

pro

spec

t o

f w

ith

dra

wal

pri

or

to t

he

clo

se o

f th

e ex

amin

atio

n.

No

fu

rth

er u

pd

ate.

50

Lo

oke

rs M

oto

r G

rou

p

Lim

ited

W

e w

rote

to

Lo

oke

rs M

oto

r G

rou

p o

n 2

7 J

anu

ary

20

14

w

ith

ou

r p

rop

osa

ls a

nd

aga

in o

n 2

7 F

ebru

ary

20

14

an

d 7

M

arch

201

4.

We

hav

e n

ot

rece

ived

an

y fu

rth

er

corr

esp

on

den

ce f

rom

Lo

oke

rs M

oto

r G

rou

p.

No

fu

rth

er u

pd

ate.

51

Th

e M

erce

rs C

om

pan

y Th

e co

rres

po

nd

ent

was

co

nta

cted

on

31

Jan

uar

y 2

01

4 b

y le

tter

wit

h f

urt

her

info

rmat

ion

on

th

e p

roje

ct b

ased

up

on

th

eir

rep

rese

nta

tio

n.

Ass

et P

rote

ctio

n A

gree

men

t p

rogr

esse

d t

o f

inal

fo

rm.

Rep

rese

nta

tio

n w

ith

dra

wn

11

Mar

ch 2

01

4.

Pag

e 2

4

No

. O

rgan

isat

ion

St

atu

s as

ref

lect

ed

in s

ub

mis

sio

ns

mad

e f

or

3 M

arch

20

14

d

ead

line

U

pd

ate

d s

tatu

s as

of

11

Mar

ch 2

01

4

52

N

ort

rust

No

min

ees

Lim

ited

Le

gal d

ue

dili

gen

ce is

at

an a

dva

nce

d s

tage

wit

h c

on

trac

ts

awai

ted

to

fac

ilita

te a

n a

nti

cip

ate

d e

xch

ange

of

con

trac

ts

in A

pri

l/M

ay 2

014

. Th

e re

pre

sen

tati

on

s w

ill t

her

efo

re n

ot

be

wit

hd

raw

n.

No

fu

rth

er u

pd

ate.

53

R

oya

l Lo

nd

on

Mu

tual

In

sura

nce

So

ciet

y Li

mit

ed

Agr

eed

Hea

ds

of

Term

s w

ith

th

e R

oya

l Lo

nd

on

Mu

tual

In

sura

nce

So

ciet

y Li

mit

ed.

The

form

al le

gal a

gree

men

t is

ex

pec

ted

to

be

com

ple

ted

at

the

end

of

Mar

ch 2

01

4.

No

fu

rth

er u

pd

ate.

54

Ta

tte

rsh

all C

astl

e

Term

s ag

reed

wit

h C

row

n E

stat

e fo

r re

loca

tio

n o

f m

oo

rin

g,

and

agr

eem

ent

in p

rin

cip

le w

ith

Cit

y o

f W

est

min

ster

fo

r re

loca

tio

n o

f ac

cess

. G

ener

al u

nd

erst

and

ing

wit

h T

CG

Bar

s Li

mit

ed (

ship

ow

ner

) o

n r

elo

cati

on

pro

cess

an

d

com

pen

sati

on

, bu

t n

o f

orm

al a

gree

men

t ye

t.

No

fu

rth

er u

pd

ate

.

55

Th

e B

atte

rsea

Bar

ge

Mee

tin

gs w

ere

hel

d in

sp

rin

g/su

mm

er 2

01

3 w

ith

Bat

ters

ea

Bar

ge a

nd

St

Jam

es (

wh

o c

on

tro

l acc

ess

to t

he

vess

el)

to

dis

cuss

th

e re

loca

tio

n o

f th

e b

arge

7m

to

th

e w

est.

B

atte

rsea

Bar

ge u

nd

erst

oo

d t

he

req

uir

emen

t fo

r th

em t

o

mo

ve a

nd

ind

icat

ed t

hat

th

ey w

ou

ld li

ke t

his

to

hap

pen

as

late

as

po

ssib

le p

rio

r to

th

e st

art

of

ou

r co

nst

ruct

ion

wo

rks.

St

Jam

es s

tate

d t

hat

th

ey w

ou

ld p

refe

r th

e m

ove

to

tak

e p

lace

as

soo

n a

s p

oss

ible

so

as

to c

oin

cid

e w

ith

th

eir

re-l

and

scap

ing

of

the

rive

rban

k. A

ny

mo

ve p

rio

r to

th

e st

art

of

ou

r co

nst

ruct

ion

wo

rks

wo

uld

nee

d a

gree

men

t b

etw

een

St

Jam

es a

nd

Bat

ters

ea

Bar

ge a

nd

req

uir

e a

sep

arat

e p

lan

nin

g p

erm

issi

on

to

be

sub

mit

ted

to

th

e Lo

nd

on

Bo

rou

gh o

f W

and

swo

rth

. W

e w

ill c

on

tin

ue

to

acti

vely

en

gage

wit

h b

oth

par

ties

to

est

ablis

h a

mu

tual

ly

agre

eab

le s

olu

tio

n.

No

fu

rth

er u

pd

ate.

56

M

alco

lm H

olli

s LL

P

Follo

win

g fr

equ

ent

atte

mp

ts t

o c

on

tact

th

ose

rep

rese

nti

ng

the

occ

up

iers

of

thes

e b

usi

nes

s u

nit

s, a

n e

mai

l was

A

mee

tin

g h

as n

ow

bee

n a

rran

ged

to

tak

e p

lace

on

11

Mar

ch

20

14

. Th

is is

wit

h a

n a

gen

t o

nly

rec

en

tly

app

oin

ted

to

Pag

e 2

5

No

. O

rgan

isat

ion

St

atu

s as

ref

lect

ed

in s

ub

mis

sio

ns

mad

e f

or

3 M

arch

20

14

d

ead

line

U

pd

ate

d s

tatu

s as

of

11

Mar

ch 2

01

4

rece

ived

on

24

Feb

ruar

y 2

01

4, p

rovi

din

g u

s w

ith

det

ails

of

a n

ewly

ap

po

inte

d a

gen

t w

ith

wh

om

we

hav

e b

een

ask

ed

to

en

gage

.

Ther

e h

as y

et t

o b

e a

mee

tin

g ar

ran

ged

an

d t

her

e w

ill b

e n

o p

rosp

ect

of

agre

emen

t to

re

po

rt b

efo

re t

he

clo

se o

f th

e ex

amin

atio

n.

The

rep

rese

nta

tio

ns

will

th

eref

ore

no

t b

e w

ith

dra

wn

.

rep

rese

nt

the

join

t in

tere

sts

of

all p

arti

es a

t B

roo

ks C

ou

rt.

It

is b

elie

ved

to

be

the

com

men

cem

ent

of

wh

at w

ill t

hen

b

eco

me

neg

oti

atio

ns

to r

each

a m

utu

ally

acc

ep

tab

le

agre

emen

t w

ith

bo

th t

he

ow

ner

s an

d o

ccu

pie

rs o

f B

roo

ks

Co

urt

. Th

is p

arty

is t

he

occ

up

ier

of

five

un

its

in B

roo

ks C

ou

rt.

57

M

anif

est,

MM

K

Ente

rpri

ses,

Kir

tlin

g P

rop

erti

es L

td, J

oh

n

Wo

od

man

, Ian

Th

om

pso

n, P

equ

od

B

VI I

nc

Follo

win

g fr

equ

ent

atte

mp

ts t

o c

on

tact

th

ose

rep

rese

nti

ng

the

ow

ner

s o

f th

ese

bu

sin

ess

un

its,

an

em

ail w

as r

ece

ived

o

n 2

4 F

ebru

ary

201

4, p

rovi

din

g u

s w

ith

det

ails

of

a n

ewly

ap

po

inte

d a

gen

t w

ith

wh

om

we

hav

e b

een

ask

ed

to

en

gage

.

Ther

e h

as y

et t

o b

e a

mee

tin

g ar

ran

ged

an

d t

her

e w

ill b

e n

o p

rosp

ect

of

agre

emen

t to

re

po

rt b

efo

re t

he

clo

se o

f th

e ex

amin

atio

n.

The

rep

rese

nta

tio

ns

will

th

eref

ore

no

t b

e w

ith

dra

wn

.

A m

eeti

ng

has

no

w b

een

arr

ange

d t

o t

ake

pla

ce o

n 1

1 M

arch

2

01

4. T

his

is w

ith

an

age

nt

on

ly r

ece

ntl

y ap

po

inte

d t

o

rep

rese

nt

the

join

t in

tere

sts

of

all p

arti

es a

t B

roo

ks C

ou

rt.

It

is b

elie

ved

to

be

the

com

men

cem

ent

of

wh

at w

ill t

hen

b

eco

me

neg

oti

atio

ns

to r

each

a m

utu

ally

acc

ep

tab

le

agre

emen

t w

ith

bo

th t

he

ow

ner

s an

d o

ccu

pie

rs o

f B

roo

ks

Co

urt

. Th

ese

par

ties

are

th

e fr

eeh

old

ow

ner

s o

f u

nit

s 2

-7, 9

an

d 1

0 B

roo

ks C

ou

rt.