Download - Kelly Field Comprehensive Plan

Kelly FieldComprehensive Plan

Technical Advisory CommitteeMeeting #3December 16, 2020

AgendaWelcome & Introductions ….…………………………………………………… 10:00am – 10:10

Brief Recap of Kelly Field ……….…...……………………..………………….. 10:10 – 10:15

Planned Airfield Development ….….…………………………………………• Consolidated Facilities• Predictable Landing Surface

10:15 – 11:00

Economic Impact Analysis ….….……………………………………………….• Qualitative and Quantitative Findings

11:00 – 11:20

Project Wrap-Up …………………….….…………………………………………… • Plan Process & Next Steps to Plan Adoption

11:20 – 11:30am

3

Kelly Field

4

Port San Antonio

JBSA-Lackland

Brief Recap of Kelly Field

Brief Recap of Kelly Field• CIL/MIL Airport• Regional Economic Driver

o Region’s longest runway (11,550 feet) with heavy-lift cargo capabilities

o 36,000+ flight operations in 2018

• Critical to USAF Missiono 502nd ABWo 433rd ALW USAFRo 149th FW TXANG

• Critical to PSA Missiono Fixed Base Operatoro Specialized Aerospace Industryo U.S. Customs & Border Protection FISo Foreign-Trade Zone (#80-10)

USAF Kelly Field District

Jointly Used Flying Facilities

PSA Exclusive Use Area

PSA Exclusive Use Area

USAF ExclusiveUse Area

(PSA Leaseback)

5

Define the Geographic Footprint & Economic Impact of Kelly Field

Catalog the Regulatory and Planning Context of

Kelly Field

Create A Single Plan Defining the Long-Term Vision and Sustainable Growth for Kelly Field

Identify and Mitigate Conflict and Compatibility

Issues at Kelly Field

6

Brief Recap of Kelly Field – Objectives of the Plan

Planned Airfield Development

PSA

1. Kelly Field Master Plan2. ALS Analysis

3. Civil Aviation Terminal

JBSA

1. Kelly District ADP (FOUO)2. PSA Leaseback ADP (FOUO)

3. ATCT Siting Study

Planned Airfield Development

8

New Site

10

Site in 2019 Kelly Field Master Plan

Consolidated Facilities – Siting

Parcels to be Acquired for New Location Under Consideration

11

Consolidated Facilities – Current Land Use

Expansion Area• All parcels to be acquired are zoned I-1

(Industrial)• Therefore, Consolidated Facilities will be

consistent with the City of San Antonio Comprehensive Plan

• Need Ingress/Egress via U.S. Route 90 Right-of-Way (State of Texas)

Previous Growdon Rd. Ingress/Egress Issue• RESOLVED: Will Acquire 2 Full Residential

Parcels at Growdon Rd. Terminus

Residential

Residential

Commercial

Right-of-Way

Fixed Base Operator (FBO)

Jet and Twin-Engine Aircraft

12

Consolidated Facilities – Planning

Access to U.S. Route 90

Access to Airfield via Dedicated Taxiway

Hangars and Tie-Downs for Parking

Federal Inspection Station (FIS) for Passengers and Cargo

PSA Operations

13

Consolidated Facilities – Design (Conceptual)

PLS Planning ImplicationsBaseline Stats for

Temporary Closure of Runway 16-34

300+ USAF Personnel Deployed

$2M USAF Ongoing Cost per Month

Loss of USAF Contribution toLocal Economy

Hardship to PSA Customers

Planned Major M&R• 2023 – Runway Rehabilitation Design• 2028 – Temporary closure of Runway 16-34 scheduled to begin

Previous Major M&R in 2016• Replaced over 30 concrete panels on Runway 16-34 • Improved runway pavement condition index (“PCI”) on average from 51 to 64• Operational and financial burden on both JBSA and PSA

PCI Map Prior to 2016 M&R

15

Baseline Stats

8,000 Feet LongAll Civil and F-16, Most C-5M Operations

9,600 Feet LongAll Civil, F-16, and C-5M Operations

Operational During TemporaryClosure of Runway 16-34

Design Standards

UFC Standards

Obstructions Will Hinder Civil Aeronautical Development

FAA Standards

Obstructions Can Be Mitigated

16

PLS Planning Considerations & Requirements

Alternative 1Temporary Runway via

Taxiway ‘A’ Improvements

Visual

8,380 Feet

East ofExisting Runway

Alternative 2Permanent PLSvia New Build

Non-Precision

8,000 Feet


Alternative 3Permanent PLSvia New Build

Precision

8,000 Feet


Alternative 4Non-Simultaneous

Parallel Runway via New Build

Precision

9,600 Feet

West ofExisting Runway

17

PLS Alternatives

PLS Alternative 1Visual Temporary Runway

18

PLS Alternative 1 – Visual Temporary Runway

19

20

PLS Alternative 2Non-PrecisionPermanent PLS

PLS Alterative 3 Precision

Permanent PLS

21

PLS Alternative 2 – Non-Precision Permanent PLS

22

PLS Alternative 3 – Precision Permanent PLS

PLS Alterative 4Precision Non-Simultaneous Parallel Runway

23

NEEDS TO BE INTREGRATED WITH KELLY FIELD ADP PLANNED DEVELOPMENT

24

PLS Alternative 4 – Precision Non-Simultaneous Parallel Runway

PLS Alternative 4 – Precision Non-Simultaneous Parallel RunwayFAA Part 77 Imaginary Surfaces

25

BUILDINGHEIGHT RELATIVE

TO ALS CENTERLINETRANSITIONAL SURFACE PENETRATION

ARFF 28.5 9.9 FEET

PENETRATIONS ON EXISTING STRUCTURES CAN BE

MITIGATED BY MARKING AND LIGHTS

NEEDS TO BE INTEGRATED WITH KELLY FIELD ADP

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT

PLS Alternative 4 – Precision Non-Simultaneous Parallel Runway UFC Imaginary Surfaces

26

BUILDINGWITHIN PRIMARY

SURFACETRANSITIONAL SURFACE

PENETRATION

ACTC NO 30.7 FEET

ARFF YES N/A

BUILDING #1 NO 4.5 FEET

BUILDING #2 NO 2.7 FEET

STRUCTURE #1 YES 77.1 FEET

NEEDS TO BE INTEGRATED WITH KELLY FIELD ADP PLANNED DEVELOPMENT

Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3

27

Airfield Development Scenarios

1. PLS Alternative 12. PLS Alternative 23. PLS Alternative 3

• Temporary Runway to satisfy most urgent need for a PLS

• Permanent PLS over two phases to achieve 20-year vision for Kelly Field

1. PLS Alternative 12. PLS Alternative 4

1. PLS Alternative 1Followed by Full Reconstruction

of Existing Runway 16-34


• Non-Simultaneous Parallel Runway to achieve 20-year vision for Kelly Field


• Full reconstruction of Existing Runway 16-34 to increase lifespan and remove near-future temporary closures

28

PLS Decision Matrix

Critical Path DevelopmentTemporary Visual Runway and

Consolidated Facilities

29

What is/Why do the Economic Impact of Kelly Field?

31

• What is an Economic Impact Analysis – identifies the economic effects of an asset (i.e., Kelly Field) in order to recognize its economic contributions and benefits.

• Why do an Economic Impact Analysis – provides comprehensive insight of economic contributions and benefits to Local/Regional/National economies, which can be used to evaluate and plan future needs of investment and allocation of resources

• Using IMPLAN – an economic analysis modeling tool, we can get a snapshot of time of Kelly Field’s economic contribution and benefit to Greater San Antonio

What is IMPLAN?

32

• IMPLAN widely used economic impact toolo IMPLAN platform combines extensive databases,

industry sectors, economic factors, multipliers and demographic statistics

o For this study, gains insight into an Airports contributions to a region, impacts to an economy, and modeling the impacts of growth or changes

• Quantifies direct impacts by sectoro Direct Effectso Indirect Effectso Induced Effects

• Creates picture of local economy and impactso Jobso Expenditureso Payroll/Salarieso Tax implications Contributions to the local and regional economy

are critical to the PSA Mission

What are the results of Economic Impact Evaluations?

33

Direct Impacts

Indirect Impacts

Induced Impacts

WagesPayroll

ExpendituresTaxes

Upstream LinkagesSupported Sectors

Business to BusinessSupply Chain

$ Earned is Spent Throughout the

EconomyCumulative Impact of

Supply Chain

IMPLAN Economic Impact Analysis – Kelly Field

34

Direct Spending

On-airport spending on employment, operations, and capital projectsOff-airport spending by local military personnel when deployed due to temporary closure of Runway 16-34

Impacts in addition to direct spending created in the San Antonio-New Braunfels MSA

Income generated by aviation and the number of jobs supported by Kelly Airfield and its runway access

Combined impacts of direct and induced spending

Tax revenue of business and military activity related to Kelly Airfield to local and State government

InducedBenefits

Jobs and Income

Total Output $

Taxes

EconImpactOutputs

Quantitative Economic Data for Kelly Field

JBSA(Military)

3,500+ FTE JobsActive Duty & Civilian

Personnel

$352M Payroll

$435M Expenditures*

PSA(Civilian)

2,600+ FTE Jobs8 Corporate Activities, FIS& DOD Support Missions

$260M Payroll

$1.9B Average Expenditures*

35

Boeing

433RD AW

149TH FW

GDC TechnicsForward Air

Atlantic Aviation

SafranBario Aviation

Boeing

GoAeroMx

Pinnacle Logistics & FIS

* Expenditures include all expense disbursement not covered by payroll.

36

Direct Spending

Airport-related Income $611.7M

On-Airport Expenditures (including capital costs) $2.33B

Estimated state/local taxes $49.5M

Airport-related employment 6,162 jobs

Induced Benefits

Induced Direct Impacts $830.5M

Total Induced Employment Impacts 5,169 jobs

Kelly Field Economic Impact Results

Total Dollar Impacts

Total Employment Impacts

Total Employment Impacts

$3.16 Billion $873.6 Million

11,330 Jobs

Total Kelly Field Economic

Impact

37

Aerospace Manufacturing Industry

o Largest economic sector at Kelly Field providing 2,300 jobso Expended over $30M with Kelly Field providers of parts and labor in 2020o Expended over $126M with 66 suppliers in Bexar County in 2020

Connected Economic Sectors – Top 10 (out of 364 sectors)

1. Aircraft Manufacturing2. Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing3. Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment

Manufacturing4. Owner-Occupied Dwellings5. Wholesale Machinery Equipment and Supplies

6. Federal Government - Military Payroll7. Wholesale – Appliances and Electrical and Electronic Goods8. Air Transportation – (FBO, Air Cargo, Flight Training)9. Other Real Estate10. Monetary Authorities and Depository Credit

Intermediation

Kelly Field Impacts the Regional Economy

Why is the Kelly Field Economic Impact Unique?

38

• Telling the full story of Kelly Field

• Associated Sector and Industry connections ─ Platform Integration─ Applied Technologies ─ Innovation

• National Implications of Kelly Field─ Military

▪ Defense Health Administration▪ Disaster Response

─ National Aerospace System▪ Aero Medical▪ Global Logistics

Kelly Field

Medical/Disaster Response

Why is the Kelly Field Economic Impact Unique?

39

AEROSPACE DEFENSE MANUFACTURING

CYBERSECURITYGLOBAL LOGISTICS

40

Business Impacts from Runway Closure

2,624 Jobs deployed, furloughed, or terminated (cumulative)

$1.9B annual loss in San Antonio-New Braunfels MSA

Military Expenses from Runway Closure

764 Direct Job Impacts During Closure

$94M Total $ Impacts During Closure

Includes: $29M Cost Per Year For Deployment

• $2,420,400 cost per month

• $29,044,800 cost per year

• $45,567,200 cost per 18 months

Kelly Fields Critical Value to the Economy

Plan Process

Catalog Authority and

Planning Context

Stakeholder Survey and Interviews

Data Collection and Inventory

Final Plan and Adoption

Public Involvement & TAC/PAC Meetings

Alternative Concepts

Project Initiation and Administration

Economic Impact

Resolution Strategies

Draft Plan

TAC #1

Conflict and Compatibility

Analysis

TAC #2

TAC #3

42

Next Steps to Plan Adoption• Review Economic Impact Analysis & Findings (Working Paper #2)

• Finalize Future Conditions (Working Paper #3)

• Compile Working Papers #1-3 into Draft Comprehensive PlanoTAC to Review Draft Plan and Offer Comments

oRevise and Publish Final Plan for Public Review by Stakeholders

oRevise and Adopt Plan

43

If you have any questions, please contact the folks listed below for further comments and considerations

AACOG

Larry Dotson – Compatible Use Program Manager

Port San Antonio

Rick Crider – Executive VP, Airport, Railport & Military Relations

CHA Consulting

Robert LaFayette – Aviation Planning Section Manager

44