Kelly Field Comprehensive Plan
Transcript of Kelly Field Comprehensive Plan
AgendaWelcome & Introductions ….…………………………………………………… 10:00am – 10:10
Brief Recap of Kelly Field ……….…...……………………..………………….. 10:10 – 10:15
Planned Airfield Development ….….…………………………………………• Consolidated Facilities• Predictable Landing Surface
10:15 – 11:00
Economic Impact Analysis ….….……………………………………………….• Qualitative and Quantitative Findings
11:00 – 11:20
Project Wrap-Up …………………….….…………………………………………… • Plan Process & Next Steps to Plan Adoption
11:20 – 11:30am
3
Brief Recap of Kelly Field• CIL/MIL Airport• Regional Economic Driver
o Region’s longest runway (11,550 feet) with heavy-lift cargo capabilities
o 36,000+ flight operations in 2018
• Critical to USAF Missiono 502nd ABWo 433rd ALW USAFRo 149th FW TXANG
• Critical to PSA Missiono Fixed Base Operatoro Specialized Aerospace Industryo U.S. Customs & Border Protection FISo Foreign-Trade Zone (#80-10)
USAF Kelly Field District
Jointly Used Flying Facilities
PSA Exclusive Use Area
PSA Exclusive Use Area
USAF ExclusiveUse Area
(PSA Leaseback)
5
Define the Geographic Footprint & Economic Impact of Kelly Field
Catalog the Regulatory and Planning Context of
Kelly Field
Create A Single Plan Defining the Long-Term Vision and Sustainable Growth for Kelly Field
Identify and Mitigate Conflict and Compatibility
Issues at Kelly Field
6
Brief Recap of Kelly Field – Objectives of the Plan
Planned Airfield Development
PSA
1. Kelly Field Master Plan2. ALS Analysis
3. Civil Aviation Terminal
JBSA
1. Kelly District ADP (FOUO)2. PSA Leaseback ADP (FOUO)
3. ATCT Siting Study
Planned Airfield Development
8
New Site
10
Site in 2019 Kelly Field Master Plan
Consolidated Facilities – Siting
Parcels to be Acquired for New Location Under Consideration
11
Consolidated Facilities – Current Land Use
Expansion Area• All parcels to be acquired are zoned I-1
(Industrial)• Therefore, Consolidated Facilities will be
consistent with the City of San Antonio Comprehensive Plan
• Need Ingress/Egress via U.S. Route 90 Right-of-Way (State of Texas)
Previous Growdon Rd. Ingress/Egress Issue• RESOLVED: Will Acquire 2 Full Residential
Parcels at Growdon Rd. Terminus
Residential
Residential
Commercial
Right-of-Way
Fixed Base Operator (FBO)
Jet and Twin-Engine Aircraft
12
Consolidated Facilities – Planning
Access to U.S. Route 90
Access to Airfield via Dedicated Taxiway
Hangars and Tie-Downs for Parking
Federal Inspection Station (FIS) for Passengers and Cargo
PSA Operations
PLS Planning ImplicationsBaseline Stats for
Temporary Closure of Runway 16-34
300+ USAF Personnel Deployed
$2M USAF Ongoing Cost per Month
Loss of USAF Contribution toLocal Economy
Hardship to PSA Customers
Planned Major M&R• 2023 – Runway Rehabilitation Design• 2028 – Temporary closure of Runway 16-34 scheduled to begin
Previous Major M&R in 2016• Replaced over 30 concrete panels on Runway 16-34 • Improved runway pavement condition index (“PCI”) on average from 51 to 64• Operational and financial burden on both JBSA and PSA
PCI Map Prior to 2016 M&R
15
Baseline Stats
8,000 Feet LongAll Civil and F-16, Most C-5M Operations
9,600 Feet LongAll Civil, F-16, and C-5M Operations
Operational During TemporaryClosure of Runway 16-34
Design Standards
UFC Standards
Obstructions Will Hinder Civil Aeronautical Development
FAA Standards
Obstructions Can Be Mitigated
16
PLS Planning Considerations & Requirements
Alternative 1Temporary Runway via
Taxiway ‘A’ Improvements
Visual
8,380 Feet
East ofExisting Runway
Alternative 2Permanent PLSvia New Build
Non-Precision
8,000 Feet
East ofExisting Runway
Alternative 3Permanent PLSvia New Build
Precision
8,000 Feet
East ofExisting Runway
Alternative 4Non-Simultaneous
Parallel Runway via New Build
Precision
9,600 Feet
West ofExisting Runway
17
PLS Alternatives
PLS Alterative 4Precision Non-Simultaneous Parallel Runway
23
NEEDS TO BE INTREGRATED WITH KELLY FIELD ADP PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
PLS Alternative 4 – Precision Non-Simultaneous Parallel RunwayFAA Part 77 Imaginary Surfaces
25
BUILDINGHEIGHT RELATIVE
TO ALS CENTERLINETRANSITIONAL SURFACE PENETRATION
ARFF 28.5 9.9 FEET
PENETRATIONS ON EXISTING STRUCTURES CAN BE
MITIGATED BY MARKING AND LIGHTS
NEEDS TO BE INTEGRATED WITH KELLY FIELD ADP
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
PLS Alternative 4 – Precision Non-Simultaneous Parallel Runway UFC Imaginary Surfaces
26
BUILDINGWITHIN PRIMARY
SURFACETRANSITIONAL SURFACE
PENETRATION
ACTC NO 30.7 FEET
ARFF YES N/A
BUILDING #1 NO 4.5 FEET
BUILDING #2 NO 2.7 FEET
STRUCTURE #1 YES 77.1 FEET
NEEDS TO BE INTEGRATED WITH KELLY FIELD ADP PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3
27
Airfield Development Scenarios
1. PLS Alternative 12. PLS Alternative 23. PLS Alternative 3
• Temporary Runway to satisfy most urgent need for a PLS
• Permanent PLS over two phases to achieve 20-year vision for Kelly Field
1. PLS Alternative 12. PLS Alternative 4
1. PLS Alternative 1Followed by Full Reconstruction
of Existing Runway 16-34
• Temporary Runway to satisfy most urgent need for a PLS
• Non-Simultaneous Parallel Runway to achieve 20-year vision for Kelly Field
• Temporary Runway to satisfy most urgent need for a PLS
• Full reconstruction of Existing Runway 16-34 to increase lifespan and remove near-future temporary closures
What is/Why do the Economic Impact of Kelly Field?
31
• What is an Economic Impact Analysis – identifies the economic effects of an asset (i.e., Kelly Field) in order to recognize its economic contributions and benefits.
• Why do an Economic Impact Analysis – provides comprehensive insight of economic contributions and benefits to Local/Regional/National economies, which can be used to evaluate and plan future needs of investment and allocation of resources
• Using IMPLAN – an economic analysis modeling tool, we can get a snapshot of time of Kelly Field’s economic contribution and benefit to Greater San Antonio
What is IMPLAN?
32
• IMPLAN widely used economic impact toolo IMPLAN platform combines extensive databases,
industry sectors, economic factors, multipliers and demographic statistics
o For this study, gains insight into an Airports contributions to a region, impacts to an economy, and modeling the impacts of growth or changes
• Quantifies direct impacts by sectoro Direct Effectso Indirect Effectso Induced Effects
• Creates picture of local economy and impactso Jobso Expenditureso Payroll/Salarieso Tax implications Contributions to the local and regional economy
are critical to the PSA Mission
What are the results of Economic Impact Evaluations?
33
Direct Impacts
Indirect Impacts
Induced Impacts
WagesPayroll
ExpendituresTaxes
Upstream LinkagesSupported Sectors
Business to BusinessSupply Chain
$ Earned is Spent Throughout the
EconomyCumulative Impact of
Supply Chain
IMPLAN Economic Impact Analysis – Kelly Field
34
Direct Spending
On-airport spending on employment, operations, and capital projectsOff-airport spending by local military personnel when deployed due to temporary closure of Runway 16-34
Impacts in addition to direct spending created in the San Antonio-New Braunfels MSA
Income generated by aviation and the number of jobs supported by Kelly Airfield and its runway access
Combined impacts of direct and induced spending
Tax revenue of business and military activity related to Kelly Airfield to local and State government
InducedBenefits
Jobs and Income
Total Output $
Taxes
EconImpactOutputs
Quantitative Economic Data for Kelly Field
JBSA(Military)
3,500+ FTE JobsActive Duty & Civilian
Personnel
$352M Payroll
$435M Expenditures*
PSA(Civilian)
2,600+ FTE Jobs8 Corporate Activities, FIS& DOD Support Missions
$260M Payroll
$1.9B Average Expenditures*
35
Boeing
433RD AW
149TH FW
GDC TechnicsForward Air
Atlantic Aviation
SafranBario Aviation
Boeing
GoAeroMx
Pinnacle Logistics & FIS
* Expenditures include all expense disbursement not covered by payroll.
36
Direct Spending
Airport-related Income $611.7M
On-Airport Expenditures (including capital costs) $2.33B
Estimated state/local taxes $49.5M
Airport-related employment 6,162 jobs
Induced Benefits
Induced Direct Impacts $830.5M
Total Induced Employment Impacts 5,169 jobs
Kelly Field Economic Impact Results
Total Dollar Impacts
Total Employment Impacts
Total Employment Impacts
$3.16 Billion $873.6 Million
11,330 Jobs
Total Kelly Field Economic
Impact
37
Aerospace Manufacturing Industry
o Largest economic sector at Kelly Field providing 2,300 jobso Expended over $30M with Kelly Field providers of parts and labor in 2020o Expended over $126M with 66 suppliers in Bexar County in 2020
Connected Economic Sectors – Top 10 (out of 364 sectors)
1. Aircraft Manufacturing2. Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing3. Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment
Manufacturing4. Owner-Occupied Dwellings5. Wholesale Machinery Equipment and Supplies
6. Federal Government - Military Payroll7. Wholesale – Appliances and Electrical and Electronic Goods8. Air Transportation – (FBO, Air Cargo, Flight Training)9. Other Real Estate10. Monetary Authorities and Depository Credit
Intermediation
Kelly Field Impacts the Regional Economy
Why is the Kelly Field Economic Impact Unique?
38
• Telling the full story of Kelly Field
• Associated Sector and Industry connections ─ Platform Integration─ Applied Technologies ─ Innovation
• National Implications of Kelly Field─ Military
▪ Defense Health Administration▪ Disaster Response
─ National Aerospace System▪ Aero Medical▪ Global Logistics
Kelly Field
Medical/Disaster Response
Why is the Kelly Field Economic Impact Unique?
39
AEROSPACE DEFENSE MANUFACTURING
CYBERSECURITYGLOBAL LOGISTICS
40
Business Impacts from Runway Closure
2,624 Jobs deployed, furloughed, or terminated (cumulative)
$1.9B annual loss in San Antonio-New Braunfels MSA
Military Expenses from Runway Closure
764 Direct Job Impacts During Closure
$94M Total $ Impacts During Closure
Includes: $29M Cost Per Year For Deployment
• $2,420,400 cost per month
• $29,044,800 cost per year
• $45,567,200 cost per 18 months
Kelly Fields Critical Value to the Economy
Plan Process
Catalog Authority and
Planning Context
Stakeholder Survey and Interviews
Data Collection and Inventory
Final Plan and Adoption
Public Involvement & TAC/PAC Meetings
Alternative Concepts
Project Initiation and Administration
Economic Impact
Resolution Strategies
Draft Plan
TAC #1
Conflict and Compatibility
Analysis
TAC #2
TAC #3
42
Next Steps to Plan Adoption• Review Economic Impact Analysis & Findings (Working Paper #2)
• Finalize Future Conditions (Working Paper #3)
• Compile Working Papers #1-3 into Draft Comprehensive PlanoTAC to Review Draft Plan and Offer Comments
oRevise and Publish Final Plan for Public Review by Stakeholders
oRevise and Adopt Plan
43
If you have any questions, please contact the folks listed below for further comments and considerations
AACOG
Larry Dotson – Compatible Use Program Manager
Port San Antonio
Rick Crider – Executive VP, Airport, Railport & Military Relations
CHA Consulting
Robert LaFayette – Aviation Planning Section Manager
44