8/8/2019 Hydrodesulfurization Often Abbreviated to HDS
1/16
Questes
Diesel? Quantos compostos? Ou a faixa? Dados cinticos e termodinmicos?
Devera ter tratamento de H2S? Se houver e as especificaes de segurana?
Tem que haver uma unidade de produo de hidrognio?
Qual a porcentagem de enxofre que tem na entrada e na sada?
hydrodesulfurization Often abbreviated to HDS. A general term for processes that
convert sulfur compounds in petroleum fractions to hydrogen sulfide, and simultaneously
convert highmolecularweight hydrocarbons to more volatile ones. The process operates in the
liquid phase under hydrogen pressure, in a trickle flow reactor containing a heterogeneous
catalyst. The catalyst is typically a mixture of cobalt and molybdenum oxides on alumina. They
are converted to their sulfides prior to use. More recently, transition metal phosphides have
been proposed as catalysts. Such processes with special names that are described in this
dictionary are Alkacid, Alkazid, Autofining, Cycloversion, Diesulforming, GO-fining, Gulfining,
Hycon, Hyperforming, Iso-therming, RDS Isomax, Residfining, Trickel, Ultrafining, VGO Isomax,
VRDS Isomax.
Reynolds, J.G., Chem. Ind. (London), 1991, 570.
Startsev, A.N., Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng., 1995, 37(3), 353.
Nagai, M., Fukiage, T., and Kurata, S., Catal. Today, 2005, 106(14), 201.
Hydrodesulfurization and hydrodemetallization activities cannot be predicted by such
conventional measurements as total sulfur, metals, or asphaltene content, or Conradsoncarbon value (Dolbear et al., 1987). To choose effective processing strategies, it is necessary to
determine properties from which critical reactivity indices can be developed. Indeed, properties
of heavy oil vacuum residua determined by conventional methods are not good predictors of
behavior of feedstocks in upgrading processes (Dawson et al., 1989). The properties of residua
vary widely and the existence of relatively large numbers of polyfunctional molecules results in
molecular association that can affect reactivity. Therefore, it is evident that more knowledge is
needed about the components of residua that cause specific problems in processing, and how
important properties change during processing (Gray, 1990).
In summary, upgrading heavy oils and residua must, at some stage of the refinery
operation utilize hydrodesulfurization. Indeed, hydrodesulfurization (HDS) processes are usedat several places in virtually every refinery to protect catalysts, to meet product specifications
related to environmental regulations Thus, several types of chemistry might be anticipated as
occurring during hydrodesulfurization Similarly, hydrodenitrogenation (HDN) is commonly used
only in conjunction with hydrocracking, to protect catalysts. Other hydrotreating processes are
used to saturate olefins and aromatics to meet product specifications or to remove metals from
residual oils.
8/8/2019 Hydrodesulfurization Often Abbreviated to HDS
2/16
8/8/2019 Hydrodesulfurization Often Abbreviated to HDS
3/16
SULFUR IN PETROLEUM
The sulfur content of petroleum varies from less than 0.05 to more than 14% wt. but
generally falls in the range 1 to 4% wt. Petroleum having less than 1% wt. sulfur are referred to
as low-sulfurpetroleum and those above 1% wt. as high-sulfurpetroleum Most of the sulfur
present in petroleum is organically bound and any dissolved hydrogen sulfide and/or elementalsulfur usually represent only a minor part of the total sulfur. One exception that springs to mind
is the heavy crude oil that is (used to be?) recovered from the reservoir by steam injection from
the formation at Qayarah in Northeast Iraq. The total sulfur contact of this oil is approximately
8% wt. of which 6% wt. is organically-bound sulfur and the remaining 2% wt. is elemental sulfur.
Sulfur is spread throughout most fractions of petroleum but, generally, the largest amount (ca.
60% or more of the sulfur) of fraction is in the high-molecular-weight components.
Organic sulfur compounds vary in polarity and chromatographic behavior such that
some elute during liquid chromatography with the aromatic hydrocarbon fraction while others
elute with the more polar nitrogen, oxygen, and sulfur fractions that include the resins and
asphaltenes. Until recently, precise organic molecular structures have been established only for
relatively low molecular weight sulfur compounds. These compounds contain lower molecular
weight constituents, generally with fewer than 15 carbon atoms and have boiling points below
250300C (480570F). This unsatisfactory state of knowledge is aggravated by the fact that
generally 6080% of the sulfur is in the asphaltene and resin fraction that contain innumerable
individual constituents of speculative chemical structure.
Although many of the lower-boiling sulfur compounds in petroleum have been
identified (Speight, 1999 and references cited therein), it can only be surmised (with some
degree of confidence) that the same types of organic sulfur extend into uncharacterized
fractions. However, it is also believed that the distributions of sulfur functional types differ in
the high-boiling fractions. In fact, there is the distinct likelihood that many of the more polar
and higher molecularweight compounds containing more than one heteroatom (Coleman et al.,1971; Galpern, 1971; Rall et al., 1972; Thompson, 1981; Aksenova and Kamyanov, 1981;
Galpern, 1985; Orr and White, 1990).
To summarize all of this work in very general terms, the distribution of the sulfur-
containing constituents of petroleum has been determined to include the following compound
types:
1. nonthiophenic sulfur, i.e. sulfides (R-S-R1),
2. thiophenes,
3. benzothiophenes,
4. dibenzothiophenes,5. benzonaphthothiophenes, and
6. dinaphthothiophenes.
Kinetics
1. The reactions can be described in terms of simple first-order expressions.
8/8/2019 Hydrodesulfurization Often Abbreviated to HDS
4/16
2. The reactions can be described by use of two simultaneous first-order expressions;
one expression for easy-to-remove sulfur and a separate expression for difficult-to-
remove sulfur.
3. The reactions can be described using a pseudo-second-order treatment.
Each of the three approaches has been used to describe hydrodesulfurization of residuaunder a variety of conditions with varying degrees of success, but it does appear that pseudo-
second-order kinetics are favored. In this particular treatment, the rate of hydrodesulfurization
is expressed by a simple second-order equation:
C/(1-C) = k (1/LHSV)
Where C is the wt% sulfur in product/wt% sulfur in the charge, k is the reaction rate
constant, and LHSV is the liquid hourly space velocity (volume of liquid feed per hour per
volume of catalyst). Application of this model to a residuum desulfurization gave a linear
relationship (Figure 4-7)(Beuther and Schmid, 1963). However, it is difficult to accept that the
esulfurization reaction requires the interaction of two sulfurcontaining molecules (as dictated
by the second-order kinetics). To accommodate this anomaly, it has been suggested that, as
there are many different types of sulfur compounds in residua and each may react at a different
rate, the differences in reaction rates offered a reasonable explanation for the apparent
second-order behavior. For example, an investigation of the hydrodesulfurization of an Arabian
light-atmospheric residuum showed that the overall reaction could not be adequately
represented by a first-order relationship (Figure 4-8) (Scott and Bridge, 1971). However, the
reaction could be represented as the sum of two competing first-order reactions and the rates
of desulfurization of the two fractions (the oil fraction and the asphaltene fraction) could be
well represented as an overall second-order reaction.
If each type of sulfur compound is removed by a reaction that was first order withrespect to sulfur concentration, the first-order reaction rate would gradually, and continually,
decrease as the more reactive sulfur compounds in the mix became depleted. The more stable
sulfur species would remain and the residuum would contain the more difficult-to-remove
sulfur compounds. This sequence of events will, presumably lead to an apparent second-order
rate equation which is, in fact, a compilation of many consecutive first-order reactions of
continually decreasing rate constant. Indeed, the desulfurization of model sulfurcontaining
compounds exhibits first-order kinetics, and the concept that the residuum consists of a series
of first-order reactions of decreasing rate constant leading to an overall second-order effect has
been found to be acceptable. Application of the second-order rate equation to the
hydrodesulfurization process has been advocated because of its simplicity and use forextrapolating and interpolating hydrodesulfurization data over a wide variety of conditions.
However, while the hydrodesulfurization process may appear to exhibit secondorder kinetics at
temperatures near 395C (745F), at other temperatures the data (assuming second-order
kinetics) does not give a linear relationship (Ozaki et al., 1963).
On this basis, the use of two simultaneous first-order equations may be more
appropriate. The complexity of the sulfur compounds tends to increase with an increase in
boiling point and the reactivity tends to decrease with complexity of the sulfur compounds, and
8/8/2019 Hydrodesulfurization Often Abbreviated to HDS
5/16
residua (and, for that matter, the majority of heavy oils) may be expected to show substantial
proportions of difficult-to-desulfurize sulfur compounds. It is anticipated that such an approach
would be more consistent with the relative reactivity of various sulfur compound types
observed for model compounds and for the various petroleum fractions that have been
investigated.
FEEDSTOCK
TYPES
Low-Boiling Distillates
The hydrodesulfurization of light (low-boiling) distillate (naphtha) is one of the more
common catalytic hydrodesulfurization processes since it is usually used cobalt and
molybdenum (catalyst) sulfides. In such a case, presulfiding can be conveniently achieved by
the addition of sulfur compounds to the feedstock or by the addition of hydrogen sulfide to the
hydrogen.
Generally, hydrodesulfurization of naphtha feedstocks to produce catalytic reforming
feedstocks is carried to the point where the desulfurized feedstock contains less than 20 ppm
sulfur. The net hydrogen produced by the reforming operation may actually be sufficient toprovide the hydrogen consumed in the desulfurization process.
The hydrodesulfurization of middle distillates is also an efficient process and
applications include predominantly the desulfurization of kerosene, diesel fuel, jet fuel, and
heating oils which boil over the general range of 250 to 400C (480 to 750F). However, with
this type of feedstock, hydrogenation of the higher-boiling catalytic cracking feedstocks has
8/8/2019 Hydrodesulfurization Often Abbreviated to HDS
6/16
become increasingly important where hydrodesulfurization is accomplished alongside the
saturation of condensed-ring aromatic compounds as an aid to subsequent processing.
PROCESS VARIABLES
The efficiency of the hydrodesulfurization process is measured by the degree of sulfur
removal or, in other words, by the yields of sulfur-free products. However, there are several
process variables (Table 5-8) that need special attention as any one of these variables can have
a marked influence on the course and efficiency of the hydrodesulfurization process.
The major process variables are (1) reactor temperature; (2) hydrogen pressure; (3)
liquid hourly space velocity; and (4) hydrogen recycle rate. Other variables such as reactor type
and catalyst type have been discussed in an earlier part of this chapter, while the influence of
the feedstock type will be discussed
Reactor Temperature
The temperature in the hydrodesulfurization reactor is often considered to be the
primary means by which the process is controlled. For example, at stabilized reactor conditions,
a rise of 10C (l8F) in the reaction temperature will substantially increase, and may even
double, the reaction rate. Generally, an increase in the temperature (from 360 to 380C, i.e.,
from 680 to 715F) will increase the conversion slightly (Figure 5-11) (Pachano et al., 1977) or
for a fixed conversion of about 90% enables the quantity of catalyst necessary for the process
to be halved.
In the same manner as in hydrocracking (Dolbear, 1997), hydrogen is added at
intermediate points in hydrodesulfurization reactors. This is important for control of reactor
temperatures. The mechanical devices in the reactor, called reactor internals, which accomplish
this step are very important to successful processes.
If redistribution is not efficient, some areas of the catalyst bed will have more contact
with the feedstock. This can lead to three levels of problems:
8/8/2019 Hydrodesulfurization Often Abbreviated to HDS
7/16
1. Poor selectivity: Ratios of hydrogen, oil, and catalyst outside design ranges will change
the yield structures. Some parts of the bed will be hotter than other parts. Some fractions of
the feedstock will be cracked to undesirable low molecular weight (light hydrocarbon) products
and
conversion will be lower.
2. Rapid catalyst aging: Higher than desirable hydrogenation can increase local reactor
temperatures markedly. Catalysts can sinter, losing surface area and activity and shortening run
length.
3. Hot spots: When local reactor temperatures are well above 400C (750F), thermal
cracking can become important. Thermal cracking produces olefins, which add hydrogen,
releasing heat. This increases the temperatures further, and thermal cracking rates go up.
These hot spots can easily reach temperatures higher than the safe upper limits for the reactor
walls, and results can be catastrophic.
Effect of temperature on the desulfurization process.
8/8/2019 Hydrodesulfurization Often Abbreviated to HDS
8/16
There are, however, limits to which the temperature can be increased without adversely
affecting process efficiency; at temperatures above 410C (770F), thermal cracking of the
hydrocarbon constituents becomes the predominant process that can lead to formation of
considerable amounts of low-molecular-weight hydrocarbon liquids and gases. In addition,
increasing the partial pressure of the hydrogen cannot diminish these high-temperature
cracking reactions. In addition, excessively high temperatures (above 400C or 750F) lead todeactivation of the catalyst much more quickly than lower temperatures.
The hydrodesulfurization of low boiling (naphtha) feedstocks is usually a gas-phase
reaction and may employ the catalyst in fixed beds and (with all of the reactants in the gaseous
phase) only minimal diffusion problems are encountered within the catalyst pore system. It is,
however, important that the feedstock be completely volatile before entering the reactor as
there may be the possibility of pressure variations (leading to less satisfactory results) if some
of the feedstock enters the reactor in the liquid phase and is vaporized within the reactor.
In applications of this type, the sulfur content of the feedstock may vary from 100 ppm
to 1% and the necessary degree of desulfurization to be effected by the treatment may vary
from as little as 50% to more than 99%. If the sulfur content of the feedstock is particularly low,
it will be necessary to presulfide the catalyst. For example, if the feedstock only has 100 to 200
ppm sulfur, several days may be required to sulfide the catalyst as an integral part of the
desulfurization process even with complete reaction of all of the feedstock sulfur to, say, One
particular aspect of the hydrodesulfurization process that needs careful monitoring, with
respect to feedstock type, is the exothermic nature of the reaction.
The heat of the reaction is proportional to the hydrogen consumption and with the
more saturated lower-boiling feedstocks where hydrocracking may be virtually eliminated, the
overall heat production during the reaction may be small, leading to a more controllable
temperature profile. However, with the heavier feedstocks where hydrogen consumption is
appreciable (either by virtue of the hydrocracking that is necessary to produce a usable product
or by virtue of the extensive hydrodesulfurization that must occur), it may be desirable toprovide internal cooling of the reactor. This can be accomplished by introducing cold recycle gas
to the catalyst bed to compensate for excessive heat.
One other generalization may apply to the lower-boiling feedstocks in the
hydrodesulfurization process. The process may actually have very little effect on the properties
of the feedstock (assuming that hydrocracking reactions are negligible)removal of sulfur will
cause some drop in specific gravity which could give rise to volume recoveries approaching (or
even above) 100%. Furthermore, with the assumption that cracking reactions are minimal,
there may be a slight lowering of the boiling range due to sulfur removal from the feedstock
constituents. However, the production of lighter fractions is usually small and may only amount
to some 1 to 5% by weight of the products boiling below the initial boiling point of thefeedstock.
One consideration for the heavier feedstocks is that it may be more economical to
hydrotreat and desulfurize high-sulfur feedstocks before catalytic cracking than to hydrotreat
the products from catalytic cracking. This approach (Speight and Moschopedis, 1979; Decroocq,
1984) and has the potential for several advantages, such as:
1. the products require less finishing;
8/8/2019 Hydrodesulfurization Often Abbreviated to HDS
9/16
2. sulfur is removed from the catalytic cracking feedstock, and corrosion
is reduced in the cracking unit;
3. coke formation is reduced;
4. higher feedstock conversions; and
5. the potential for better-quality products.
The downside is that many of the heavier feedstocks act as hydrogen sinks in terms oftheir ability to interact with the expensive hydrogen. A balance of the economic
advantages/disadvantages must be struck on an individual feedstock basis.
As the trend toward utilizing heavier petroleum feedstocks continues, the hydrotreating
processes used to upgrade such stocks become increasingly important.
Difficulties are encountered in the development of catalysts with high resistance to
deactivation. Another important challenge is that of designing three-phase reactors capable of
processing large quantities at high temperatures and pressures.Desirable features of such reactors are low-pressure drop, in the presence of deposits
and low mass transfer resistance between gas-liquid and liquid-solid. The monolithic reactor
offers a viable alternative in which the monolith is typically 1 mm or a few millimeters in
diameter. Each channel is bounded by either a porous wall or a solid wall onto which a porous
washcoat may be applied. In these narrow channels, gas and liquid flow concurrently.
Reactor designs for hydrodesulfurization of various feedstocks vary in the way in which
the feedstock is introduced into the reactor and in the arrangement, as well as the physical
nature, of the catalyst bed. The conditions under which the hydrodesulfurization process
operates (i.e., high temperatures and high pressures) dictate required wall thickness
(determined by the pressure/temperature/strength ratio). In addition, resistance of the reactor
walls to the corrosive attack by hydrogen sulfide and hydrogen (to name only two of the
potential corrosive agents of all of the constituents in, or arising from, the feedstock) can be a
problem.
Precautions should be taken to ensure that wall thickness and composition yield
maximum use and safety.
8/8/2019 Hydrodesulfurization Often Abbreviated to HDS
10/16
With these criteria in mind, various reactors have been designed to satisfy the needs of
the hydroprocesses, including hydrodesulfurization (McEvoy, 1996).
Thus, reactors may vary from as little as 4 ft. in diameter to as much as 20 ft. in diameter
and have a wall thickness anywhere from 4.5 to 10 in. or so. These vessels may weigh from 150
tons to as much as 1000 tons. Obviously, before selecting a suitable reactor, shipping and
handling requirements (in addition to the more conventional process economics) must be givenserious consideration.
The hydrodesulfurization process operates using high hydrogen pressure, typically 1500
to 2500 psi and temperatures are on the order of 290 to 370C (550 to 700F). Several process
configurations are used, depending on the feed and the design criteria. All include provisions
for the addition of cold hydrogen at several points in the hydrocracking reactor to control
reactor temperatures, since a great amount of heat is released by hydrogenation. Reactor
internals provided for this function are complex mechanical devices.
Finally, and before a discussion of the various reactor-bed types used in
hydrodesulfurization, a note that the once-popular once-through reactors, where the
incompletely converted or unconverted fraction of the feedstock is separated from the lower-
boiling products are being replaced by recycle reactors. In these reactors, any unconverted
feedstock is sent back (recycled) to the reactor for further processing. In such a case, the
volume flow of the combined (fresh and unconverted) feedstock is the sum of the inputs of the
fresh feedstock and recycled feedstock:
8/8/2019 Hydrodesulfurization Often Abbreviated to HDS
11/16
8/8/2019 Hydrodesulfurization Often Abbreviated to HDS
12/16
Distillate Unionfining for ULSD (Ultralow-Sulfur Diesel)
Recent environmental regulations will require a quantum leap in the reduction of sulfur
in diesel fuels. While present regulations mandate a sulfur content of 500 wt ppm (U.S.) and
350 wt ppm (Europe), recently enacted legislation requires that the sulfur level be reduced to
15 wt ppm (by 2006 in the United States) and 10 wt ppm (by 2007 in Europe) before the end of
the decade. To meet these more stringent regulations, new, more active catalysts are requiredas well as more severe operating conditions.
To achieve these very low levels of sulfur, the catalyst must be able to desulfurize the
most difficult sulfur speciessterically hindered dibenzothiophenes. These compounds contain
alkyl groups in the 4- and 6-positions, thus greatly restricting access to the sulfur atom. An
illustration of the difficulty of desulfurizing these types of compounds is given in Fig. 8.3.10.
Since the difficult sulfur species are thiophenic, lets consider the relative reaction rates shown
in Fig. 8.3.10, starting with thiophene which is assigned a desulfurization rate of100. As the
thiophene molecule becomes more complex and bulky with the addition of an aromatic ring, as
in benzothiophene, the desulfurization rate drops to 60. With the addition of another aromatic
ring, dibenzothiophene, the rate of desulfurization decreases by an order of magnitude to 5.
Addition of substituents to the rings at positions far removed from the sulfur atom, as in 2,8-
dimenthyldibenzothiophene, do not affect the rate of desulfurization.
On the other hand, addition of substituents at positions adjacent to the sulfur atom, as
in 4,6-dimenthyldibenzothiophene, greatly reduces the rate of desulfurization to a relative rate
of 0.5. the difficulty in desulfurizing 4,6-dimethyldibenzothiophene (and com- pounds of a
similar structure with alkyl substituents adjacent to the sulfur atom) is due to the steric
hindrance these substituents present to access of the sulfur atom to the active site of the
catalyst. For the production of the ULSD, it is these most difficult sulfur species that must
undergo desulfurization.
In addition to the difficulty of desulfurizing the sterically hindered dibenzothiophenes,
the impact of a number of poisons for the desulfurization reaction must be considered. Theseinclude nitrogen and oxygen compounds. While the toxic effect of these poisons may have
been neglected in the past, it must be taken into account for a successful design of a unit for
ULSD production.
Based on fundamental mechanistic and kinetic studies, present theory suggests that in
order to desulfurize these molecules, one of the aromatic rings must first undergo saturation.
Since Ni/Mo catalysts have better saturation activity than Co/Mo catalysts, the former are
preferred for deep desulfurization of distillates to ULSD specifications. The requirement to
effect such a deep level of desulfurization will necessitate the application of much more severe
process conditions for distillate Unionfining than were necessary in the past (Table 8.3.2).
8/8/2019 Hydrodesulfurization Often Abbreviated to HDS
13/16
8/8/2019 Hydrodesulfurization Often Abbreviated to HDS
14/16
CED [Conversion Extraction Desulfurization] A process for reducing the sulfur content of diesel
fuel. Peroxyacetic acid oxidizes the organic sulfur compounds to sulfones, which are removed
by solvent extraction. Developed in 2000 by Petro Star.
Chem. Eng. (N.Y.), 2000, 107(4), 17.
DHDS [Diesel deep HydroDeSulfurization] A petroleum refining process developed by the
Instituto Mexicano del Petroleo (IMP), with plans for it to be in operation at the Pemex refinery
at Cadereyta, Mexico, in 1999.
Diesulforming A *hydrodesulfurization process which used a molybdenum-containing catalyst.
Developed by the Husky Oil Company and first operated in Wyoming in 1953.
Oil Gas J., 1956, 54(46), 165.
Unzelman, G.H. and Wolf, C.J., in Petroleum Processing Handbook, Bland, W.F. and Davidson,R.L.,
Eds., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967, 342.
Gulf HDS A process for *hydrorefining and *hydrocracking petroleum residues in order to make
fuels and feeds for *catalytic cracking. Developed by the Gulf Research & Development
Company.
Unzelman, G.H. and Wolf, C.J., in Petroleum Processing Handbook, Bland, W.F. and Davidson,
R.L.,
Eds., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967, 323.
M-coke A homogeneous *desulfurization process that uses an oil-soluble molybdenum
compound as the catalyst.
Rueda, N., Bacaud, R., Lanteri, P., and Vrinat, M., Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 2001, 215(12), 81.
Beardon, C.L.A., Chem. Eng. Prog., 1981, 44.
OATS [Olefinic Alkylation ofThiophenic Sulfur] A gasoline desulfurization process. Thiophenes
and mercaptans are catalytically reacted with olefins to produce higher-boiling compounds that
can more easily be removed by distillation prior to hydrodesulfurization. This minimizes
hydrogen usage. The process uses a solid acid catalyst in a liquid-phase, fixed bed reactor.
Developed by BPAmoco in 2000 and tested in Bavaria and Texas. First used commercially at the
Bayernoil refinery, Neustadt, in 2001. The process won a European Environment Award in 2002.
Chem. Eng. (N.Y.), 2000, 107(13), 19.
Chem. Eng. (Rugby, Engl.), 2001, 21 June, Awards supplement, 5.
8/8/2019 Hydrodesulfurization Often Abbreviated to HDS
15/16
Eur. Chem. News, 19 Nov 2001, 31.
Oil Gas J., 3 Dec 2001, 99(49), 8.
Proc. Eng., 2002, 83(10), 2.
Prime-G, Prime-G+A deep *hydrodesulfurizing process for removing sulfur compounds prior to
*fluid catalytic cracking. It uses a fixed catalyst bed and conventional distillation. Developed by
IFP (now Axens) from 1999. The + version is an improvement on the original process. In 2001,
over 60 units had been licensed and 11 were operating commercially. First commercialized at
Gelsenkirchen, Germany, in 2001. Now operated in Finland, Belgium, and Canada.
Eur. Chem. News, 29 Nov 1999, 71(1887), 30.
Ptrole et Gaz Informations, JanFeb 2000 (1744), 17, Mar 2000 (1745), 43.
Chem. Eng. (N.Y.), 2001, 108(12), 23.
Hydrocarbon Process. Int. Ed., Aug 2002, 82(8), 38; Aug 2005, 84(8), 31.
Chem. Eng. (N.Y.), 2003, 110(9), 27.
RCD Unionfining [Reduced Crude Desulfurization] The latest version of UOPs process for
removing organic sulfur-, nitrogen-, and metal-compounds from heavy petroleum fractions.
Formerly called RCD Unibon, which succeeded the Black Oil Conversion process (BOC). Different
catalysts are used for different oils. Developed and licensed by UOP. The first commercial unit
started operating in Japan in 1967; since then, 27 more units have been licensed.
Marcos, F. and Rosa-Brussin, D., Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng., 1995, 37(1), 3.
Gillis, D.B., in Handbook ofPetroleum Refining Processes, 3rd ed., Meyers, R.A., Ed., McGraw-
Hill,New York, 2003, 8.43.
Sandwich desulfurization A *hydrotreating process for removing sulfur compounds from
petroleum streams. The sulfur compounds are first hydrogenated and then absorbed in a train
of three catalyst beds: the sandwich. In the first bed, zinc oxide absorbs hydrogen sulfide and
reactive sulfur compounds; in the second, cobalt molybdate on alumina hydrogenates
nonreactive thiophenes, forming hydrogen sulfide; in the third, zinc oxide absorbs the hydrogen
sulfide from the second bed. Developed and offered by ICI, particularly for use in the *ICI Steam
Naphtha Reforming process.
Sulfur-X A process for removing sulfur compounds (principally thiophene) from naphtha by
solvent extraction with sulfolane. Developed by UOP and announced in 2002. This process does
not require hydrogen, which gives it an advantage over competing desulfurization processes.
Chem. Eng. (N.Y.), 2003, 110(9), 29.
Nafis, D.A. and Houde, E.J., in Handbook ofPetroleum Refining Processes, 3rd ed., Meyers, R.A.,
Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 2003, 11.75.
8/8/2019 Hydrodesulfurization Often Abbreviated to HDS
16/16
Trickle Hydrodesulfurization A process for removing sulfur-, nitrogen-, and heavy-
metalcompounds from petroleum distillates before *catalytic cracking. The preheated feed is
hydrogenated, without a catalyst, in an adiabatic reactor at 315 to 430C. Developed by Shell
Development Company. As of1978, 91 units had been installed.
Hoog, H., Klinkert, H.G., and Schaafsma, A., Pet. Refin., 1953, 32(5), 137.
Hydrocarbon Process., 1964, 43(9), 194.
Unionfining A group of petroleum *hydrodesulfurization and *hydrodenitrogenation processes
developed by the Union Oil Company of California, primarily for making premium-quality diesel
fuel. In 1991, 90 such units were operating. One variant is for purifying naphthalene by
selective hydrogenation. The naphthalene vapor is hydrogenated at 400C over a cobalt
molybdenum catalyst, thereby converting the sulfur in thionaphthalene to hydrogen sulfide.
The technology was acquired by UOP in 1995.
Hydrocarbon Process. Int. Ed., 1988, 67(9), 79.
Eur. Chem. News, 1995, 63(1653), 24.
Kokayeff, P., in Handbook ofPetroleum Refining Processes, 3rd ed., Meyers, R.A., Ed., McGraw-
Hill, New York, 2003, 8.31
Top Related