HILTONDESIGNCOMPetition
STAG
E 1
02_hilt
on d
esig
n Co
mpe
titi
on 2
017
CONTENTS
00_1. Competition Callout 03
2. Background 04
2.1 The Location 04
2.2 About the Department of Communities(Housing) 05
2.3 Probity and Fairness 05
2.4 Competition Governance 05
3. Competition Brief 06
3.1 Objectives 06
3.2 Competition Site 06
3.3 Design Quality Principles 07
3.4 Project Budget 08
3.5 Planning Policy 08
4. The Program 09
5. The Competition Requirements 10
5.1 Eligibility 10
5.2 Registration 10
5.3 Stage 1 – Initial Concept 11
5.4 Stage 2 – Developed Concept 13
6. The Fine Print 14
6.1 Agreement 14
6.2 Eligibility 14
Competition Sponsor
Supported by
6.3 Conflict of Interest 14
6.4 Submission requirements for Stage 1 14
6.5 Assessment process for Stage 1 14
6.6 Assessment process for Stage 2 14
6.7 Honorarium 14
6.8 Budget 15
6.9 Builders and tender for building contract 15
6.10 Participant Costs 15
6.11 Intellectual property and Copyright 15
6.12 Moral Rights 15
6.13 Disclosure of Information 15
6.14 Privacy 15
6.15 Release and Indemnity 15
6.16 Changes to these conditions 15
6.17 Governing law and Jurisdiction 15
7. Definitions 16
Attachment 1 – Design Competition Jury 17
Attachment 2 – Competition Site 18
Attachment 3 – Development Sites 19
Attachment 4 – Entry Form 21
Endorsed by
03_hilt
on d
esig
n Co
mpe
titi
on 2
017
“The power of architecture is the power of synthesis, to say what you want in two words instead of three, to achieve a solution in as few moves as possible”. Alejandro Aravena
This stage of the Competition requires the
submission of an Initial Concept design for two
public housing units up to 80 square metres each
on a rear battle-axe lot in Hilton. A maximum of four
short-listed entries will be invited to participate in
Stage 2.
This competition marks a search for a new kind of
public housing, inviting novel typologies for infill
development in Western Australia that can challenge
expectations and generate variety, equity and
affordability.
Well-designed public housing promotes economic
and social diversity and improves the quality of
life for its residents. Without public housing, many
vulnerable Australians would be unable to access
accommodation, forcing them to make desperate
choices about how they meet their need for shelter.
Place-responsive infill housing can also create
more sustainable cities by providing diversity in the
housing market, by countering urban sprawl, by
creating more opportunities for social engagement
and by consolidating services to deliver better public
infrastructure.
The Hilton Design Competition (Competition) will
tackle these challenges head-on by demonstrating
how design quality can be achieved through an
‘economy of means’ to create public housing that
is modest, inclusive and ‘placeful.’ Restraint can
engender clarity rather than paucity: as Alejandro
Aravena has it “The power of architecture is the
power of synthesis, to say what you want in two
words instead of three, to achieve a solution in
as few moves as possible.” The Competition will
also demonstrate how infill development can be
sensitively designed to retain the unique character of
an area. The Competition is divided into two stages.
Competition Callout
01_STAGE 1 INITIAL CONCEPT
STAGE 2 DEVELOPED CONCEPT The second stage requires the submission
of a more detailed design proposal based on the
Initial Concept that can be adapted to six other infill
lots in Hilton. Upon submission, each short-listed
entry will be entitled to receive $10,000 for design
services rendered. The winning entry will be offered
a contract to apply their model to the design of
14 new public housing units on seven battle-axe
lots in Hilton.
Small and emerging architectural practices are
encouraged to compete provided at least one
Participant is a registered architect in Western
Australia. The Competition is the first step in the
larger Hilton Revitalisation Project (Project) that
will contribute significantly and creatively to the
evolution of Hilton’s unique character.
This Competition is a fantastic opportunity to
bring about positive change in Hilton as well
as contributing new approaches to counteract
unsustainable urban sprawl.
04_hilt
on d
esig
n Co
mpe
titi
on 2
017
2.1 The Location
Hilton is located approximately five kilometres east
of the Fremantle town centre and was originally
developed for state housing in the post-war period.
Hilton’s design origins are found in the ‘Garden City’
design philosophy, with curvilinear streets and single
detached houses situated well back from the street
in generous landscape settings.
A number of the original houses that were
constructed in Hilton were prefabricated in Austria
at the end of World War II or were designed by
notable Western Australian architects Krantz
and Sheldon, which make a valuable contribution
to Hilton’s unique character. However, as these
homes do not meet current accessibility standards
and require a high level of ongoing maintenance
many older tenants have difficulty in maintaining
independence in these homes.
In recent times, Hilton has become a more desirable
place to live due to its tree lined streets, its close
proximity to public transport and the range of
amenities on offer in nearby Fremantle. Its older
homes have become particularly attractive to people
interested in mid-century design and the typically
large lots are popular for planting edible gardens
and harnessing natural resources for
power generation.
Unfortunately the lack of housing diversity combined
with the gentrification of the area has contributed
to Hilton’s rising unaffordability, making appropriate
public housing more important than ever. New,
well-designed one or two bedroom homes would
be ideal to meet this demand but smaller, accessible
dwellings are scarce in Hilton.
BACK- GROUND
02_
Google Earth
HILTON
FREMANTLE
05_hilt
on d
esig
n Co
mpe
titi
on 2
017
2.2 About the Department of Communities (Housing)
This Competition has been initiated by the Housing
division of the Department of Communities, acting
through its legal entity, the Housing Authority
(Housing) which is a statutory body corporate
established by the Housing Act 1980 (WA).
Housing operates across the land, housing,
property finance and human services sectors
to provide affordable housing opportunities for
people who would be otherwise unable to access
housing through the private market. Our focus
is on innovation and working with and through
the market to ensure that low to moderate income
households have access to safe, appropriate,
secure and affordable housing in successful
inclusive communities. We facilitate social and
economic outcomes for individuals, communities
and the State to contribute to a better, stronger
Western Australia.
Housing has a longstanding interest in redeveloping
land and demonstrating the opportunities for
economic growth that can be provided to business,
residents and the community as a whole. Housing
is committed to ensuring the best outcomes for
each area identified for infill or urban renewal,
while taking into account that every area is unique.
2.3 Probity and Fairness
The Competition has been endorsed by the
Australian Institute of Architects and has been
developed in consultation with the Office of the
Government Architect of Western Australia and
the City of Fremantle. Housing has appointed an
expert Design Competition Jury (Jury) to select
the shortlisted entries at Stage 1 and to determine
the winner of the Competition at Stage 2.
The Chair of the Jury is Geoffrey London,
Professor of Architecture at The University
of Western Australia and former Government
Architect for Western Australia and Victoria.
Full details of the Jury are provided in
Attachment 1 – Design Competition Jury.
2.4 Competition Governance
The Technical Adviser (Adviser) and Competition
Registrar (Registrar) are responsible for the
governance of the Competition. Housing may
appoint any suitably qualified person to act in the
abovementioned positions.
The Adviser and Registrar must:
• act in accordance and ensure compliance with
the Terms and Conditions of the Competition;
• make no attempt to unfairly or inappropriately
influence the Jury process or any member of
the Jury; and
• accept the decision of the Jury as final.
The Adviser and Registrar will use their reasonable
endeavours to maintain anonymity of entries and
confidentiality throughout the Competition. The
Registrar will ensure that all entries comply in all
respects with the Terms and Conditions of this
Competition and may disqualify any entry that does
not comply.
02_BACKGROUND
06_hilt
on d
esig
n Co
mpe
titi
on 2
017
3.1 Objectives
The objective of the Competition is to design an
affordable, adaptable and appropriate public housing
concept that meets the needs and aspirations of
both the future occupants and the local community.
As with all housing, it needs to be responsive to its
local context and function in a way that contributes
positively to the quality of life for its occupants.
Like many of the pre-fabricated homes that were
originally built in Hilton, the concept should be
modest, functional and dignified.
This Competition requires the development of a
unique concept design for 15A Harwood Street,
Hilton (the ‘Competition Site’) that incorporates two
dwellings that each have a minimum floor area of
60 square metres and a maximum floor area of 80
square metres. The concept should be considered as
a ‘design approach’ that is capable of being adapted
to six other rear battle-axe lots owned by Housing in
Hilton, which have a range of site characteristics and
constraints.
Each home should contain two bedrooms and be
designed to accommodate two person households or
more, in response to changing family circumstances
and non-traditional household types. In some cases
tenants may be elderly or have disabilities, so the
concept should incorporate design features that
help maintain the dignity and independence of the
occupants.
Two storey designs will be considered in order to
facilitate tree retention and reduce site coverage, but
at least one unit should meet the WA Liveable Homes
Essential Criteria. Each dwelling should include a
single car port or garage, however second parking
bays that have the flexibility to be useable outdoor
areas are encouraged.
3.2 Competition Site
The Competition Site is a rear infill battle-
axe lot in Hilton which has an effective area of
approximately 380 square metres (refer Attachment
2 – Competition Site). There are two trees on
the property which have been identified by an
arboriculturalist as having a high retention value
and should be retained where possible. Details of
the Competition Site and of the other six nominated
properties to be developed by Housing as part of
this Project are attached (refer Attachment 3 –
Development Sites.)
There is also an existing timber framed,
weatherboard workers’ cottage with a pitched, gable
tiled roof on the front property that was constructed
in 1953. This dwelling is a good example of post-war
government housing and will be restored by Housing
as part of a demonstration project for this site, which
will include the development of public housing on the
rear battle-axe lot.
COMPETITION BRIEF
03_
07_hilt
on d
esig
n Co
mpe
titi
on 2
017
3.3 Design Quality Principles
The Initial Concept must clearly address the
following design quality principles:
3.3.1 Occupant amenity – The proposal should
deliver high levels of occupant amenity and
be adaptable to meet the needs of a range
of occupant groups, which typically are low
income workers but in some cases may include
single parents, the elderly and people with
disabilities. Indoor and outdoor living spaces
should be capable of being adapted for use by
people with different physical or mental health
needs and household scenarios. Living spaces
should have the ability to be cost-effectively
personalised to suit each occupant.
3.3.2 Character and Context – Designs should
exhibit a considered relationship with Hilton’s
unique cultural heritage and be responsive to
the site. The existing streetscape should be
preserved through the sensitive orientation and
placement of new dwellings to allow freedom
for more contemporary design approaches.
Designs should be simple, dignified and place
responsive.
3.3.3 Functionality and Build Quality – Designs
should optimise the efficient use of space
for occupants and provide strong functional
relationships between indoor and outdoor
areas. Communal spaces and facilities that
03_PROJECT BRIEF
SOUTH STREET
WINTERFOLD ROAD
CA
RR
ING
TON
S
TREE
T
STO
CK
RO
AD
HILTONPRIMARYSCHOOL
COMPETITION SITE15 HARWOOD STREET
provide good spatial efficiency, deliver value
for money and offer a social benefit to the
occupants are encouraged, however the
management of these spaces must be clearly
articulated. Private outdoor areas must also be
provided for each occupant. Buildings should be
designed based on whole-of-life cost principles
using durable materials in a manner that
minimises maintenance.
3.3.4 Sustainability – Designs should incorporate
a cohesive, integrated approach to energy
efficiency and generation, and water saving and
capture based on whole-of-life cost principles.
Designs must demonstrate a thoughtful
approach to environmental sustainability
including passive solar design, cross ventilation,
smart technologies and building performance in
terms of thermal comfort.
3.3.5 Landscaping – Landscaping should be designed
with an equivalent level of consideration
as the building and considered as part of a
holistic site response. The landscape should
be an extension of the dwelling that allows
occupants to use outdoor areas in a range of
ways. Landscaping must be water wise, low-
maintenance and should provide an appropriate
balance of plant types to provide summer
shading, ground cover and opportunities for
occupants to create edible gardens.
08_hilt
on d
esig
n Co
mpe
titi
on 2
017
3.4 Project Budget
The maximum construction budget for the project
is $200,000 per dwelling (inc. GST) plus an
additional $20,000 per lot (inc. GST) for landscaping
and external works. Construction costs may be
averaged across the project, so that the total cost
of the delivery of 14 dwellings across 7 lots does
not exceed a budget of $2.94 million (inc. GST). This
construction figure is the upper limit and is separate
from the budget for subdivision of the land and
professional fees associated with delivery of the
Project. This figure excludes a provision of up to
$205,800 for architectural fees.
Participants should be mindful that as this is a public
housing project designs should seek to minimise
costs and achieve value for money. This Competition
is an exercise in the economical use of space and
resources while providing a high standard of living.
Finding clever and innovative approaches to reduce
the project budget will provide Housing with greater
capacity to deliver future public housing projects.
3.5 Planning Policy
A 2011 Memorandum of Understanding between
the City of Fremantle and Housing allows for the
development of one additional dwelling on a rear
vacant “battle-axe’ lot over and above the dwelling
yield which would otherwise have been permitted
under the zoning of the land at the time. However,
this density variation is contingent upon the following
requirements being met:
• All new dwellings shall be no greater than
80 square metres in floor area;
• Where practical, all mature trees on site shall
be retained as part of the development, or suitable
replacement trees and vegetation are incorporated
as part of the development as appropriate; and
• All other normal planning requirements are
satisfied.
All relevant state and local planning requirements
apply. Variations from the planning framework may
be considered where justification is provided in
accordance with the relevant performance criteria.
In particular, variations to the maximum roof ridge
height of 6.5m specified by Local Planning Policy
3.7 may only be considered by the City of Fremantle
where the Deemed to Comply Requirements of
the Residential Design Codes regarding building
setbacks, Open Space and Design for Climate are
complied with.
Being selected as the Winning Entry does not confer
any obligation upon the determining authorities
to approve the design. All planning approvals and
building permits will be required to be obtained from
the responsible authorities.
The following state and local planning policies are
relevant to this project:
The City of Fremantle Planning Scheme No. 4
http://www.fremantle.wa.gov.au/local-planning-
scheme-no-4
The Residential Resign Codes of Western Australia
https://www.planning.wa.gov.au/dop_pub_pdf/State_
Planning_Policy_3.1-Residential_Design_Codes_.pdf
City of Fremantle Local Planning Policy 3.7 –
Garden Suburb Precinct Heritage Area
https://www.fremantle.wa.gov.au/sites/default/
files/Local%20Planning%20Policy%203.7%20
%E2%80%93%20Local%20Planning%20Policy%20
3.7%20-%20Hilton%20Garden%20Suburb%20
Precinct%20Heritage%20Area%20Local%20
Planning%20Policy%20%E2%80%93%20LPP3.7.pdf
City of Fremantle Policy D.B.H12 - Energy
Efficient Building Design
http://www.fremantle.wa.gov.au/sites/default/
files/DBH12%20-%20Energy%20Efficient%20
Building%20Design%20-%20D.B.H12.pdf
Participants should conduct the appropriate
enquiries with the relevant authorities as required.
03_PROJECT BRIEF
09_hilt
on d
esig
n Co
mpe
titi
on 2
017
STAGE 1: INITIAL CONCEPT
Competition opens 31 July 2017
Site briefing at 15 Harwood Street, Hilton (non-compulsory) 11 August 2017 (10AM)
Closing date for questions and registration 25 August 2017
Initial concept submissions due 8 September 2017
Shortlisted participants announced 5 October 2017
STAGE 2: DEVELOPED CONCEPT (for shortlisted participants only)
Detailed design brief issued 5 October 2017
Closing date for clarifications 20 October 2017
Developed concept submissions due 17 November 2017
Winner announced 14 December 2017
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE WINNING DESIGN
Start of detailed design development and contract documentation Early 2018
Construction Mid 2018
THE PROGRAM
04_
010_hilt
on d
esig
n Co
mpe
titi
on 2
017
THE COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS
05_
5.1 Eligibility
The Competition is open to individuals or teams,
comprising a registered Western Australian
architect or architectural practice, or an architect-
led multidisciplinary team of no more than five
people. Assessors of the Competition, employees of
the Department of Communities, Jury members or
any direct family members of these groups may not
participate in the Competition.
5.2 Registration
Individuals or teams must register their participation
in the Hilton Design Competition by completing the
entry form in Attachment 4 and submitting it to the
Department of Communities by 5.00pm on 25 August
2017. The form can be lodged electronically or in
person and must be addressed to:
Subject HILTON DESIGN COMPETITION – REGISTRATION
Competition Registrar Shane Downes (Project Delivery Manager)
Phone 08 9222 4762 or 0484 358 941
Email [email protected]
Address
Department of Communities (Housing)
99 Plain Street
EAST PERTH WA, 6004
Upon confirmation by the Registrar that the
eligibility requirements have been met each
Participant will be provided with a Competition
Registration Number which must be used to identify
all competition material submitted. A Competition
Kit will be provided to each Participant which will
include CAD files of the Competition Site and the
six development sites.
011_hilt
on d
esig
n Co
mpe
titi
on 2
017
05_the competition requirements
5.3 Site Briefing
A non-compulsory briefing will be held at the
Competition Site during the second week of the
Competition to allow entrants to become familiar
with the property and to ask the Advisor any
questions. Questions may also be directed to
the Advisor, David McLoughlin, no later than
25 August 2017 on (08) 9222 4822 or by email
5.4 Stage 1 – Initial Concept
Stage 1 requires the succinct communication of the
Initial Concept for the Competition Site on a single,
vertical format A1 board. Floor plans and elevations
are not required at this stage. All submissions must
comply with The Fine Print in Section 6.
5.4.1 Stage 1 Submission requirements
Each competition entry must comprise:
a. Initial Concept
The Initial Concept for the Competition Site
must comprise of a single, A1 vertical format
graphic board, to be submitted both as a
hard copy and as an electronic PDF file.
The A1 graphic board must communicate
the design proposal and articulate its
performance against the design principles.
The following elements should be conveyed
in the graphic presentation:
Site and landscape
• Illustration of site opportunities and
constraints
• Response to the site context
• Pedestrian and vehicular movement and
access
• Delineation of land use including open
space, private and communal areas
• Approach to overshadowing, solar access,
and overlooking (privacy)
• Landscaping, including both hardscape
and softscape areas
Architecture
• The design approach and organising ideas
• Useful architectural precedents and how
they apply (lessons learned)
• Dwelling layout including size, sequence of
spaces, ceiling heights
• Internal arrangements that address
orientation, cross ventilation, adaptability etc.
• Proposed palette of materials and colours
Construction
• Indicative building materials including
their technical and architectural qualities
as they contribute to the design and an
appropriate response to the context
• Indicative construction techniques
including building fabric constructability,
assembly methodology, modularisation or
pre-fabrication and lifecycle maintenance/
management
b. Written Design Statement
The Written Design Statement should be
submitted as a PDF file and hardcopy of no
more than 500 words, in Arial font with single
line spacing. The purpose of the Written
Design Statement is to further articulate:
• The manner in which the proposal
addresses the design principles
• The underlying architectural/organising
idea and any underlying theoretical or
ideological position
• The ability of the design to be adapted to
the other six development sites
• Innovative approaches in relation to design
constructability, materials or detailing
• A statement that the concept could be
translated into a design that will not
exceed the budgetary requirements
• The level of compliance of the proposal
with local planning policy requirements
• Other aspects of the design that are not
adequately communicated by the graphic
presentation
012_hilt
on d
esig
n Co
mpe
titi
on 2
017
c. Anonymity of submissions
All submission materials must include the
competition registration number. No submission
material may be marked with the name of any
individual team member or team name, or the
associated practices of the team members.
All submissions may only be identified as follows:
• The A1 graphic board must include the
Competition Registration Number in the
bottom right hand corner. The team name
or any other reference to the architectural
practice including logos, must not appear on
the actual graphic board; and
• The Written Design Statement must have
the PDF or Microsoft Word file named by
the Competition Registration Number. The
name of the individual, team, or architectural
practice must not appear within the actual
design statement.
d. Stage 1 Format
Participants must submit one (1) hard copy of
each of the following items as well as a digital
copy of each item provided on a CD or USB. All
of the items below are to be wrapped/packaged
together.
Hard copy submissions by Participants for
Stage 1 are to follow the requirements below:
Information to be marked on the
submission package REF: HILTON DESIGN COMPETITION PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
Closing date and time Submissions are to be received by 4.00pm Western Standard Time
Friday 8 September 2017
Address for submissions Department of Communities (Housing), Tenders Office Ground floor,
99 Plain Street East Perth
Access to the tender box 9:00am-4:00pm (WST)
Other requirements
Stage 1 – submit one hard copy and one electronic copy on
a CD or USB thumb drive of each item listed in 5.4.1(a) and 5.4.1(b).
The submission is to be packaged/wrapped together. Submissions
must be sent by post or personal delivery and not by facsimile or
electronically. No late submissions will be accepted.
05_the competition requirements
013_hilt
on d
esig
n Co
mpe
titi
on 2
017
e. Stage 1 Evaluation and Notification
An internal Technical Advisory Panel will
prepare an Evaluation Report which will
assess the Initial Concept submissions
against the design quality principles outlined
in Section 3.3 of the Competition Brief.
In making its decision to select a maximum
of four (4) shortlisted entries the Jury will
be informed by the Evaluation Report.
Shortlisted Participants from Stage 1 will
be invited to participate in Stage 2 and will
receive an honorarium of $10,000 upon
submission of the Developed Concept for
design consultancy services rendered.
All Participants will remain anonymous
during the assessment process. Shortlisted
Participants will be notified in writing on
confirmation of Housing’s decision. All
Participants will be notified in writing of the
results of the submissions.
5.5 Stage 2 – Developed Concept
The shortlisted Participants from Stage 1 will be
invited to participate in Stage 2 and develop the Initial
Concept into a Developed Concept proposal for the
Competition Site. On completion of Stage 1, a design
brief for the Developed Concept will be issued to the
shortlisted Participants. The Stage 2 design brief will
contain quantitative and qualitative evaluation criteria
for the Developed Concept.
5.5.1 Submission requirements
Competition entries for Stage 2 must be
presented on a maximum of ten (10), A3
Sheets (landscape format), supported by
photographs, diagrams and text. All plans,
elevations and sections are to be at a scale
of 1:100. Stage 2 submissions must include:
• Ground floor plan
• First floor plan (if applicable)
• Roof plan
• Elevations
• Building and site sections including that of
the adjoining property
• Site plan and landscape plan
• Internal and external perspective views
• Schedule of costs as described in the
Stage 2 design brief
• Information regarding the following:
– Sustainable energy, water, waste
initiatives
– Materials and colours palette
– Building and landscape maintenance
requirements
– Preliminary material specifications
5.5.2 Evaluation and Notification
The Developed Concept designs submitted by
the shortlisted Participants will be assessed
by the Technical Advisory Panel against the
Stage 2 evaluation criteria and an Evaluation
Report will be provided to the Jury. The
Jury will select the final winner following
consideration of the Evaluation Report.
The winning entry will be offered a contract
to apply their model to the design of 14
new public housing units on seven infill lots
in Hilton. This contract includes but is not
limited to design development; approvals;
and contract administration, including site
inspections as required, and monitoring
and reporting to Housing. The contract will
be subject to a 7% Architectural Services
fee (including all sub-consultant fees) less
$10,000 for design services rendered.
05_the competition requirements
014_hilt
on d
esig
n Co
mpe
titi
on 2
017
6.1 Agreement 6.1.1 By agreeing to participate in this Competition, Participants
agree to be bound by these Terms and Conditions and the Competition Brief. Each Participant must sign the Entry Form (Attachment 4).
If there is any inconsistency between the Competition Brief and the Terms and Conditions, these Terms and Conditions
will prevail to the extent of any inconsistency.
6.2 Eligibility 6.2.1 A Registered West Australian Architect or an architectural
practice or multidisciplinary team of no more than five (5) people led by an architect registered in Western Australia.
6.2.2 The following persons are ineligible to enter the Competition and must not assist any Participant:
• Any employee of Housing or any of their direct family members.
• Any assessor of the Competition or their employees or direct family members.
• Any Jury members or any employee or direct family members of the group they represent.
6.3 Conflict of Interest 6.3.1 For the purpose of this Competition, a ‘conflict of interest’
will occur where a Participant or any associate has any business, personal or other relationship that could result in, or could reasonably be perceived to result in, the Participant gaining a benefit not available to all other Participants in the Competition.
6.3.2 A benefit for the purpose of this clause includes non-financial benefits or relationships that might not be considered material at law.
6.3.3 An actual or potential conflict of interest may be declared by the affected Participant, any other Participant, the Adviser, the Registrar or Housing.
6.3.4 On becoming aware of any actual or potential conflict of interest, the relevant person must immediately notify the Registrar in writing. The Registrar will then determine whether:
• the Participant will be required to withdraw from the Competition; or
• the Participant may continue in the Competition, subject to the Jury being advised of the relevant circumstances of the conflict; or
• further actions are required to deal with the conflict.
6.4 Submission requirements for Stage 1 6.4.1 All submissions must comply with the requirements
outlined in the Competition Brief.
6.4.2 Participants are advised to retain copies of their entries as submissions will not be returned.
6.4.3 Any submissions that do not conform with the entry requirements in the Competition Brief will be deemed non-complying and may be disqualified.
6.5 Assessment process for Stage 1 6.5.1 The Technical Advisory Panel will prepare an Evaluation
Report which assesses the Stage 1 submissions against the Design Quality Principles in Section 3.3.
6.5.2 Upon receiving the Evaluation Report from the Technical Advisory Panel, the Jury will shortlist a maximum of four (4) submissions which will be invited to participate in Stage 2.
6.5.3 The assessments of submissions for Stage 1 will be undertaken in accordance with Housing’s probity process.
6.5.4 Notwithstanding any other provision of these Terms and Conditions, while Housing is committed to run the Competition it may, at its discretion, elect not to select a winner if it considers the Competition cannot continue or the submissions are not of a standard acceptable to Housing (acting reasonably).
6.5.5 Housing’s decision will be at its absolute discretion and will be final, binding and no objections will be considered.
6.6 Assessment process for Stage 2 6.6.1 The Hilton Design Competition concepts will be assessed in
two phases as follows:
6.6.1.1 Housing’s Technical Advisory Panel will prepare an Evaluation Report which assesses the submissions against the Stage 2 Evaluation Criteria stipulated in the Stage 2 Brief and recommends a winner of the Competition.
6.6.1.2 The Jury will consider the Evaluation Report in making its final decision to select a winner of the Competition.
6.6.2 The assessment of submissions from Stage 2 will be undertaken in accordance with Housing’s probity process and will be overseen by the Jury and probity officer.
6.6.3 Housing reserves the right to communicate with any or all of the shortlisted Participants prior to the announcement of a winner to clarify, amend and finalise any Stage 2 submissions.
6.6.4 Notwithstanding any other provision of these Terms and Conditions, while Housing is committed to running the
Competition, the Jury is under no obligation to pick any winners as part of the Competition if it considers the Competition cannot continue or the submissions are not of a standard acceptable to Housing (acting reasonably).
6.6.5 The Jury’s decision will be at its absolute discretion and will be final, binding and no objections will be considered.
6.6.6 Housing reserves the right to decide whether to use the Winning Entry for the Hilton Revitalisation Project or not.
6.6.7 Housing reserves the right to decide whether to use the Winning Entry for the Hilton Revitalisation Project or not. 6.6.7.1 the Winning Entry does not complete the contract
documentation in the time allowed;
6.6.7.2 the winning Developed Concept cannot be constructed for a maximum average cost of $200,000 per unit plus $20,000 per lot for landscaping (inc. GST);
6.6.7.3 Or if there is any other dispute between Housing and the Winning Entry that cannot be resolved.
6.7 Honorarium 6.7.1 Upon submission of the Developed Concept Housing will
pay a fee/prize of $10,000 to each of the shortlisted entries to contribute to participation costs and for design services rendered. All other expenses will be the responsibility of the Participants. Only one payment will be made for each shortlisted submission regardless of the number of Participants.
6.7.2 At the end of Stage 2, the Winning Entry will be offered a contract to design 14 dwellings on 7 rear infill “battle-axe” blocks based on the application of their winning design proposal. Subject to the offer being accepted, the architect will be required to enter into an agreement (Client and Architect Agreement) with Housing to design and manage the construction of the Developed Concept for a maximum sum of $205,800 (calculated as 7% of the maximum construction costs which includes GST and $10,000 for design services rendered), which is to include all:
6.7.2.1 Design services (concept design finalisation, design development and construction documentation)
6.7.2.2 Approvals (excluding application fees)
6.7.2.3 Contract administration including site inspections as required
6.7.2.4 Allowance for appointment of sub-consultants as approved, but excluding the fees of sub-consultants
6.7.2.5 Monitoring and reporting to Housing of progress and compliance .
THE FINE PRINT
06_
015_hilt
on d
esig
n Co
mpe
titi
on 2
017
6.8 Budget 6.8.1 The maximum budget for the Development has been set
as follows, with further details provided to the Shortlisted Participants in the Stage 2 Design Brief:
Construction Costsup to $200,000 (inclusive of GST) per unit
Landscaping up to $20,0000 per lot
Architects Fees up to $205,800 (inclusive of GST)
Total up to $3,145,800m (inclusive of GST)
6.8.2 A maximum budget of $3,145,800 (inc. GST) has been set to cover the total cost of the development which includes $10,000 for design services rendered. All submissions in the Competition must ensure that the average cost of the construction of each unit as part of the development is no more than $200,000 and that landscaping does not exceed $20,000 per lot (inc. GST).
6.8.3 Housing reserves the right to have any of the shortlisted designs costed by a quantity surveyor to determine if the Developed Concept (including hard and soft landscaping) can be constructed for up to $420,000 per lot (inc. GST). If the shortlisted Participant’s proposed design cannot be built within the budget, Housing reserves the right to contact the relevant Participant and ask for modifications to the Developed Concept so that the dwelling can be constructed for an average cost of $200,000 per unit (inc. GST) or less and a maximum of $20,000 for landscaping for each lot. Nothing in the clause obligates the Department of Communities to cost any submission or allow any submitted concept designs to be amended once submitted.
6.9 Builders and tender for building contract 6.9.1 Shortlisted Participants may nominate a preferred builder
including the Builder’s registration number with their Stage 2 submission.
6.9.2 Housing may invite the Winning Entry’s preferred builders to tender for the contract to build the development but is not obliged to do so. Housing reserves the right to nominate additional builders or to substitute builders for those nominated by the architect.
6.9.3 Once the tender process is complete, Housing will enter into a contract (in a form required by Housing with a builder determined by Housing to build the winning concept design(s).
6.9.4 Parties related to the Participant or the Participant’s firm are not eligible to tender for the contract to build the winning concept design.
6.10 Participant Costs 6.10.1 Housing accepts no responsibility for any costs incurred
by a Participant arising from their participation in the Competition.
6.10.2 All costs associated with the preparation and submission of an entry in the Competition including labour, materials, and any indirect costs such as photography, travel and sub-consultant costs must be met by the Participant.
6.10.3 Each Participant will be responsible for any tax implications in Australia or any other jurisdiction arising from the payment of honorarium or any other payment relating to the Competition.
6.11 Intellectual property and Copyright 6.11.1 Each Participant warrants that in preparing their entry:
a. there has been no infringement of the intellectual property rights and copyright of others; and
b. they have obtained any necessary licences or assignments from third parties.
6.11.2 Each Participant grants, and must ensure that any other owner of any Intellectual Property Rights grant, to Housing an irrevocable, perpetual, royalty-free, non-exclusive licence in any material submitted by the Team or the Participants as part of the Competition to use and display all or any information, ideas and designs submitted by the Participant including (without limitation) the right to display all or any information, ideas and designs submitted by a Participant on Housing’s website and other websites relating to the Competition and in any exhibition and to use all or
any information, ideas and designs in the Department of Communities’ promotional materials.
6.11.3 The Participants agree that Housing may use the identity of Participants and details of their designs for publicity, marketing and any other purposes.
6.11.4 All Participants must promptly inform Housing if, as a result of the Competition, material submitted as part of the Competition is used (in whole or part) in any proposed development or if the Participant received any commercial benefit from any design or idea submitted as part of the Competition.
6.11.5 The Participants of all Teams that receive an honorarium as part of the Competition must be available for publicity opportunities as required by Housing for a period of 12 months following the announcement of the Winning Entry.
6.11.6 The Winning Entry may use the winning concept design in other locations, providing the work is acknowledged as a design that was developed through this Competition.
6.11.7 The Winning Entry must obtain Housing’s prior written approval for all advertising, marketing and promotion of the winning concept design other than through the website of the Winning Entry’s firm.
6.12 Moral Rights 6.12.1 In relation to any publication, exhibition or public
dissemination of design concepts and other submitted materials, Housing and the Adviser will take all reasonable action to preserve the moral rights of the Participant.
6.13 Disclosure of Information 6.13.1 The Participants agree and acknowledge that the
information and material submitted as part of the Competition is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 (WA) and may also be disclosed by Housing under a court order or upon request of Parliament or any committee of Parliament or if otherwise required by law.
6.13.2 By submitting an entry into the Competition, each Participant releases Housing from all liability whatsoever for any loss, injury, damage, liability, costs, or expense resulting from the disclosure of information or material under this clause by Housing.
6.13.3 Subject to this clause, any personal information collected by Housing as part of this Competition will be used in accordance with its Privacy, Confidentiality and Duty of Care Policy.
6.14 Privacy 6.14.1 The Participants agree to comply with the Information
Privacy Principles set out in section 14 of the Privacy Act 1988 in respect of personal information received, created or held by parties in connection with the Competition.
6.15 Release and Indemnity 6.15.1 Each Participant will indemnify Housing, the Adviser,
Registrar and Jury members and all their respective officers, employees, contractors, agents and associates and keep them indemnified in respect of any loss suffered as a result of:
• breach of these Terms and Conditions by each Participant or any associate;
• negligence of each Participant or any associate, and
• any unlawful act, omission or fraud of each Participant or any associate.
6.15.2 Such indemnity does not apply to the extent that the loss is caused or contributed to by any act of Housing, the Adviser or a Jury member.
6.16 Changes to these Conditions 6.16.1 The Registrar will promptly notify all Participants of any
material change in the Competition Brief, the timetable, the Fine Print, timetable, or the constitution or identity of the Adviser, Registrar or Jury members.
6.17 Governing law and Jurisdiction 6.17.1 These Competition Conditions are governed by the
laws applying in the State of Western Australia.
6.17.2 The parties submit to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of Western Australia.
6.17.3 The Participants must comply with all relevant law in preparing and submitting their entry and participating in the Competition.
06_the fine print
016_hilt
on d
esig
n Co
mpe
titi
on 2
017
Competition means the ‘Hilton Design Competition’
as outlined in these Terms and Conditions and the
Competition Brief.
Competition Brief means the Hilton Design
Competition Brief.
Competition Registrar means Housing’s
representative appointed to coordinate the
Hilton Design Competition and to ensure that the
Competition is run in a fair and equitable manner.
Intellectual Property Rights means patents,
copyright, registered designs, trademarks and
the right to have confidential information (being
information which is capable of being protected
by way of an action for breach of confidence) kept
confidential; and any application or right to apply
for registration of any of those rights, but does not
include Moral Rights.
Jury means the expert Design Competition Jury
appointed by Housing to select the shortlisted entries
at Stage 1 and to determine the Winning Entry of the
Competition. Full details of the Jury are provided as
Attachment 1.
Law includes any constitution or provision, treaty,
decree, convention, statute, Act, Regulation, rule,
ordinance, proclamation, subordinate legislation,
delegated legislation, by law, judgment, rule of
common law or equity, rule, ruling or guideline by a
competent entity exercising jurisdiction in the relevant
matter, including a rule, ruling, by-law, town planning
scheme or guideline of any Government Agency.
Moral Rights has the same meaning as in the
Copyright Act 1968.
Participant means each individual or team who
submits an entry to the Competition.
Stage 2 Design Brief means the detailed design brief
issued to the Shortlisted Participants following the
assessment of the Stage 1 submissions.
Submissions means all submissions to the
Competition.
Technical Advisor means an expert adviser,
appointed by Housing to provide detailed advice and
evaluation of particular aspects of submitted entries
and to respond to any technical enquiry from any
Participant.
Technical Advisory Panel means a Panel appointed
by Housing to assess competition entries against
the evaluation criteria at each stage. The Panel will
comprise of staff from Housing that specialise in
planning, architecture, design and construction.
Terms and Conditions means the Competition
requirements outlined in The Fine Print.
Winning Entry means the architect or team
selected by the Jury as the winner of Stage 2 of the
Competition.
07_
DEFINITIONS
017_hilt
on d
esig
n Co
mpe
titi
on 2
017
ATTACHMENT 1 Design Competition Jury
Dr Geoffrey London
Geoffrey London is Professor of Architecture at The
University of Western Australia and a Professorial
Fellow at the University of Melbourne. He was, until
late 2014, the Victorian Government Architect, having
previously held the position of Western Australian
Government Architect. In these roles he was involved in
advising the two state governments on a wide range of
projects and on issues such as design quality, project
procurement, heritage, master planning, sustainability,
and development strategies. He has a long-term
professional and research interest in medium density
housing and forms of delivery that provide more
affordability and better design.
Dr Brad Pettitt
Brad is the Mayor of the City of Fremantle and has
expertise in climate change and sustainability planning.
He was previously Dean of the School of Sustainability
at Murdoch University and was appointed to the
Heritage Council of WA in 2014.
DesignCompetitionJury
Dr Geoffrey London Geoffrey is Professor of Architecture at the University of Western Australia. He is a former government architect of Victoria and Western Australia and a past dean and head of architecture at UWA. Geoffrey is a strong advocate of high quality infill housing and is on the design advisory committee for the Metropolitan Redevelopment Authority.
Dr Brad Petit Brad is the Mayor of the City of Fremantle and has expertise in climate change and sustainability planning. He was previously Dean of the School of Sustainability at Murdoch University and was appointed to the heritage Council of WA in 2014. Brad has chaired a broad range of working groups and committees including the Urban Development Advisory Committee, Transport Committee, Climate Change Adaption working group and the City Centre Strategic Sites working group.
Josh Byrne Josh is a widely respected sustainability practitioner with over 20 years’ experience in sustainability and landscape design. Josh is an adviser to the Water Corporation, Landcorp and the Metropolitan Redevelopment Authority on matters relating to urban water management, environmental technology and design. He is well regarded by the local Hilton community where he has constructed two 10 star energy efficient homes using conventional building materials and construction methods.
Melinda Payne Melinda Payne is Principal Policy Officer of the Office of the Government Architect and member pf the City of Fremantle Design Advisory Committee.
WillCarroll
DesignCompetitionJury
Dr Geoffrey London Geoffrey is Professor of Architecture at the University of Western Australia. He is a former government architect of Victoria and Western Australia and a past dean and head of architecture at UWA. Geoffrey is a strong advocate of high quality infill housing and is on the design advisory committee for the Metropolitan Redevelopment Authority.
Dr Brad Petit Brad is the Mayor of the City of Fremantle and has expertise in climate change and sustainability planning. He was previously Dean of the School of Sustainability at Murdoch University and was appointed to the heritage Council of WA in 2014. Brad has chaired a broad range of working groups and committees including the Urban Development Advisory Committee, Transport Committee, Climate Change Adaption working group and the City Centre Strategic Sites working group.
Josh Byrne Josh is a widely respected sustainability practitioner with over 20 years’ experience in sustainability and landscape design. Josh is an adviser to the Water Corporation, Landcorp and the Metropolitan Redevelopment Authority on matters relating to urban water management, environmental technology and design. He is well regarded by the local Hilton community where he has constructed two 10 star energy efficient homes using conventional building materials and construction methods.
Melinda Payne Melinda Payne is Principal Policy Officer of the Office of the Government Architect and member pf the City of Fremantle Design Advisory Committee.
WillCarroll
DesignCompetitionJury
Dr Geoffrey London Geoffrey is Professor of Architecture at the University of Western Australia. He is a former government architect of Victoria and Western Australia and a past dean and head of architecture at UWA. Geoffrey is a strong advocate of high quality infill housing and is on the design advisory committee for the Metropolitan Redevelopment Authority.
Dr Brad Petit Brad is the Mayor of the City of Fremantle and has expertise in climate change and sustainability planning. He was previously Dean of the School of Sustainability at Murdoch University and was appointed to the heritage Council of WA in 2014. Brad has chaired a broad range of working groups and committees including the Urban Development Advisory Committee, Transport Committee, Climate Change Adaption working group and the City Centre Strategic Sites working group.
Josh Byrne Josh is a widely respected sustainability practitioner with over 20 years’ experience in sustainability and landscape design. Josh is an adviser to the Water Corporation, Landcorp and the Metropolitan Redevelopment Authority on matters relating to urban water management, environmental technology and design. He is well regarded by the local Hilton community where he has constructed two 10 star energy efficient homes using conventional building materials and construction methods.
Melinda Payne Melinda Payne is Principal Policy Officer of the Office of the Government Architect and member pf the City of Fremantle Design Advisory Committee.
WillCarroll
Melinda Payne
Melinda Payne is the Associate in the WA Office of the
Government Architect. In this capacity she has provided
strategic design advice on major state projects and
has led several significant design and planning policy
initiatives. A dedicated advocate for the value of good
design, she has served on judging panels for a number
of international design competitions, has been an
Institute award juror, and has sat on academic boards
and institutional design advisory committees.
DesignCompetitionJury
Dr Geoffrey London Geoffrey is Professor of Architecture at the University of Western Australia. He is a former government architect of Victoria and Western Australia and a past dean and head of architecture at UWA. Geoffrey is a strong advocate of high quality infill housing and is on the design advisory committee for the Metropolitan Redevelopment Authority.
Dr Brad Petit Brad is the Mayor of the City of Fremantle and has expertise in climate change and sustainability planning. He was previously Dean of the School of Sustainability at Murdoch University and was appointed to the heritage Council of WA in 2014. Brad has chaired a broad range of working groups and committees including the Urban Development Advisory Committee, Transport Committee, Climate Change Adaption working group and the City Centre Strategic Sites working group.
Josh Byrne Josh is a widely respected sustainability practitioner with over 20 years’ experience in sustainability and landscape design. Josh is an adviser to the Water Corporation, Landcorp and the Metropolitan Redevelopment Authority on matters relating to urban water management, environmental technology and design. He is well regarded by the local Hilton community where he has constructed two 10 star energy efficient homes using conventional building materials and construction methods.
Melinda Payne Melinda Payne is Principal Policy Officer of the Office of the Government Architect and member pf the City of Fremantle Design Advisory Committee.
WillCarroll
Josh Byrne
Josh is an environmental scientist, author, television
presenter and research academic. He is a Research
Fellow with Curtin University’s Sustainability Policy
Institute and the CRC for Low Carbon Living and an
Adjunct Associate Professor with the School of Civil
and Environmental Engineering at the University of
New South Wales. His research interests span high
performance housing, water sensitive design and
sustainable urban developments.
Will Carroll
Will is the Manager Development at the Housing
Authority of Western Australia. He has worked across
all aspects of housing delivery that has seen him head
up regional services across WA, undertake the role
of Director Built Form and Civil Construction and was
asked to take on the inaugural position of Director
Business Development for the WA Housing Authority.
018_hilt
on d
esig
n Co
mpe
titi
on 2
017
ATTACHMENT 2 COMPETITION SITE
15 HARWOOD STREET
LEGEND
SCALE
REV D - PROPOSED BOUNDARY LAYOUT REVISED LOTS 51-54
- CC
SINGLE STOREY TILEROOF, TIMBER &FIBRO HOUSE
ALL BUILDINGS ARE TO REMAIN
4.24
OUTDOOR
44m²LIVING AREA
PROPOSED
PARKINGPROPOSED
TRUNCATION ADDEDREV C - PROPOSED OUTDOOR LIVING, PARKING AREAS AND
CLOTHESLINES
REV B - CLOTHESLINES ADDED
371m²PROPOSED LOT 51
AREA OF ACCESS LEG: 90m²TOTAL AREA INCLUDE ACCESS LEG: 470m²
380m²PROPOSED LOT 52
20.91
18.2
621
.31
17.9
4
39.0
4
14.36
18.3
21.1
17.88 4
TO BE REMOVED
REV A - SCALE CHANGED AND SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY ADDED
REV 0 - INITIAL RELEASE
TO B
E R
EM
OV
ED
R-CODE: R20/R25
PROPOSED LOTS: 2ORIGINAL LOTS: 1TOTAL AREA: 841m²LOCAL AUTHORITY: CITY OF FREMANTLE
SUBJECT TO CHANGE PENDING W.A.P.C CONDITIONS AND SURVEY
ORIGIN :
CAD 8209-01 WAPC.DWG
VER DATUM : AHD71ORIGIN : SEWER MH W8772 - LID
DATE 12/06/2015
Prepared for DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING
SCALE 1:300DWG SIZE A3SURVEYOR VU
F.B 1232/34REF 8209, 8210, 8211
C
AMENDMENTS
ROSSLAND & ARDY PTY LTDCONSULTING LICENSED SURVEYORS
177 RAILWAY PARADE, MAYLANDS 6051TEL 08 9272 2214 FAX 08 9370 3547
EMAIL [email protected]. 46 008 745 542
H
HORIZ DATUM : LOCAL
PLAN 8209-01REVISION D 12/10/2016
DB
YD
SE
WE
R
CONCRETE
BITUMEN
LEGEND
11321131
1143
LAWN
FIBRO FENCE
FIBRO SHED
TIN
FE
NC
ETI
N F
EN
CE
HARWOOD STREET
FIB
RO
FE
NC
E
LAWN
DR
IVE
WA
Y
LAWN LAWN
FOO
T P
ATH
VERANDAH
FL: 33.61
33
5023
.63
5 0 5 101:300 @ A3
3995
.34
2.39
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
S
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
//
/
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
/
//
/
//
/
/
/
//
/
//
/
/
/
//
/
//
/
/
/
//
/
//
/
/
/
//
C
PROPOSED GREEN TITLESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 1144, 1145 &1146 ON P6343(1). No. 15, 17 & 19HARWOOD STREET, HILTON.C/T: 2181-110, 2181-111, 2181-112
8.15
EDGE OF GUTTER
OVERHEAD POWER LINESEWER PIPES S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S
P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
PP
P
PP
PP
PP
PP
PP
P
PP
PP
PP
P
PP
PP
PP
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
PP
P
P
PP
P
P
PP
P
P
P
P
PIOW
FL
/////////////////////////////////////
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
/
/
//
//
//
//
/
/
/
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
/
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
/
///////////////////////////
/
/
//
/
//
/
/
/
//
/
//
/
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
//
/
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
//
/
/
/
//
/
//
/
/
/
//
/
//
/
/
/
//
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
/
//
/
//
/
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
/
//
/
//
/
/
//
//
//
//
//
//
/
//
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
/
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
/
/
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
/
/
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
/
/
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
/
/
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
/
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
////////////////////////////////////////////
/
/
/
/
//
/
//
/
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
/
//
/
//
/
/
/
//
/
//
/
/
/
//
/
//
/
/
/
//
/
//
/
/
/
//
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
/
//
/
//
/
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
//
/
//
/
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
/
//
/
//
/
/
/
//
/
//
/
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
/
//
/
//
/
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
/
/G
DescriptionTELSTRA PITELEC HOUSEHOLDCONNECTIONELEC CONSUMER POLEGAS METERGATESEWER IOTREEWATER METER
SymbolC
G
IO
W
No.15
Scale: 1:300 @ A3Drawn: J.K.ISSUED FOR INFORMATION16.02.171
NoteDateRevSUBDIVISON PLAN
15 Harwood Street, HiltonISSUED FOR INFORMATION31.08.172
RL: 32.57
TBM - SPRING HEADNAIL & PLATE
REV D - PROPOSED BOUNDARY LAYOUT REVISED LOTS 51-54
- CC
SINGLE STOREY TILEROOF, TIMBER &FIBRO HOUSE
ALL BUILDINGS ARE TO REMAIN
4.24
OUTDOOR
44m²LIVING AREA
PROPOSED
PARKINGPROPOSED
TRUNCATION ADDEDREV C - PROPOSED OUTDOOR LIVING, PARKING AREAS AND
CLOTHESLINES
REV B - CLOTHESLINES ADDED
371m²PROPOSED LOT 51
AREA OF ACCESS LEG: 90m²TOTAL AREA INCLUDE ACCESS LEG: 470m²
380m²PROPOSED LOT 52
20.91
18.2
621
.31
17.9
4
39.0
4
14.36
18.3
21.1
17.88 4
TO BE REMOVED
REV A - SCALE CHANGED AND SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY ADDED
REV 0 - INITIAL RELEASE
TO B
E R
EM
OV
ED
R-CODE: R20/R25
PROPOSED LOTS: 2ORIGINAL LOTS: 1TOTAL AREA: 841m²LOCAL AUTHORITY: CITY OF FREMANTLE
SUBJECT TO CHANGE PENDING W.A.P.C CONDITIONS AND SURVEY
ORIGIN :
CAD 8209-01 WAPC.DWG
VER DATUM : AHD71ORIGIN : SEWER MH W8772 - LID
DATE 12/06/2015
Prepared for DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING
SCALE 1:300DWG SIZE A3SURVEYOR VU
F.B 1232/34REF 8209, 8210, 8211
C
AMENDMENTS
ROSSLAND & ARDY PTY LTDCONSULTING LICENSED SURVEYORS
177 RAILWAY PARADE, MAYLANDS 6051TEL 08 9272 2214 FAX 08 9370 3547
EMAIL [email protected]. 46 008 745 542
H
HORIZ DATUM : LOCAL
PLAN 8209-01REVISION D 12/10/2016
RL: 32.57
DB
YD
SE
WE
R
11321131
1143
LAWN
FIBRO FENCE
FIBRO SHED
TIN
FE
NC
ETI
N F
EN
CE
HARWOOD STREET
FIB
RO
FE
NC
E
LAWN
DR
IVE
WA
Y
LAWN LAWN
FOO
T P
ATH
VERANDAH
FL: 33.61
33
5023
.63
5 0 5 101:300 @ A3
3995
.34
2.39
C
PROPOSED GREEN TITLESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 1144, 1145 &1146 ON P6343(1). No. 15, 17 & 19HARWOOD STREET, HILTON.C/T: 2181-110, 2181-111, 2181-112
8.15
IOW
FL
G
No.15
Scale: 1:300 @ A3Drawn: J.K.ISSUED FOR INFORMATION16.02.171
NoteDateRevSUBDIVISON PLAN
15 Harwood Street, Hilton
TBM - SPRING HEADNAIL & PLATE
LEGEND
CLOTHESLINES
Description
TELSTRA PITELEC HOUSEHOLD CONNECTIONELEC CONSUMER POLEGAS METERGATESEWER IOTREEWATER METER
Symbol
C
G
IO
W
CONCRETE
BITUMEN
EDGE OF GUTTER
OVERHEAD POWER LINESEWER PIPE
REV D - PROPOSED BOUNDARY LAYOUT REVISED LOTS 51-54
- CC
SINGLE STOREY TILEROOF, TIMBER &FIBRO HOUSE
ALL BUILDINGS ARE TO REMAIN
4.24
OUTDOOR
44m²LIVING AREA
PROPOSED
PARKINGPROPOSED
TRUNCATION ADDEDREV C - PROPOSED OUTDOOR LIVING, PARKING AREAS AND
CLOTHESLINES
REV B - CLOTHESLINES ADDED
371m²PROPOSED LOT 51
AREA OF ACCESS LEG: 90m²TOTAL AREA INCLUDE ACCESS LEG: 470m²
380m²PROPOSED LOT 52
20.91
18.2
621
.31
17.9
4
39.0
4
14.36
18.3
21.1
17.88 4
TO BE REMOVED
REV A - SCALE CHANGED AND SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY ADDED
REV 0 - INITIAL RELEASE
TO B
E R
EM
OV
ED
R-CODE: R20/R25
PROPOSED LOTS: 2ORIGINAL LOTS: 1TOTAL AREA: 841m²LOCAL AUTHORITY: CITY OF FREMANTLE
SUBJECT TO CHANGE PENDING W.A.P.C CONDITIONS AND SURVEY
ORIGIN :
CAD 8209-01 WAPC.DWG
VER DATUM : AHD71ORIGIN : SEWER MH W8772 - LID
DATE 12/06/2015
Prepared for DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING
SCALE 1:300DWG SIZE A3SURVEYOR VU
F.B 1232/34REF 8209, 8210, 8211
C
AMENDMENTS
ROSSLAND & ARDY PTY LTDCONSULTING LICENSED SURVEYORS
177 RAILWAY PARADE, MAYLANDS 6051TEL 08 9272 2214 FAX 08 9370 3547
EMAIL [email protected]. 46 008 745 542
H
HORIZ DATUM : LOCAL
PLAN 8209-01REVISION D 12/10/2016
RL: 32.57
DB
YD
SE
WE
R
11321131
1143
LAWN
FIBRO FENCE
FIBRO SHED
TIN
FE
NC
ETI
N F
EN
CE
HARWOOD STREET
FIB
RO
FE
NC
E
LAWN
DR
IVE
WA
Y
LAWN LAWN
FOO
T P
ATH
VERANDAH
FL: 33.61
33
5023
.63
5 0 5 101:300 @ A3
3995
.34
2.39
C
PROPOSED GREEN TITLESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 1144, 1145 &1146 ON P6343(1). No. 15, 17 & 19HARWOOD STREET, HILTON.C/T: 2181-110, 2181-111, 2181-112
8.15
IOW
FL
G
No.15
Scale: 1:300 @ A3Drawn: J.K.ISSUED FOR INFORMATION16.02.171
NoteDateRevSUBDIVISON PLAN
15 Harwood Street, Hilton
TBM - SPRING HEADNAIL & PLATE
LEGEND
CLOTHESLINES
Description
TELSTRA PITELEC HOUSEHOLD CONNECTIONELEC CONSUMER POLEGAS METERGATESEWER IOTREEWATER METER
Symbol
C
G
IO
W
CONCRETE
BITUMEN
EDGE OF GUTTER
OVERHEAD POWER LINESEWER PIPE
REV D - PROPOSED BOUNDARY LAYOUT REVISED LOTS 51-54
- CC
SINGLE STOREY TILEROOF, TIMBER &FIBRO HOUSE
ALL BUILDINGS ARE TO REMAIN
4.24
OUTDOOR
44m²LIVING AREA
PROPOSED
PARKINGPROPOSED
TRUNCATION ADDEDREV C - PROPOSED OUTDOOR LIVING, PARKING AREAS AND
CLOTHESLINES
REV B - CLOTHESLINES ADDED
371m²PROPOSED LOT 51
AREA OF ACCESS LEG: 90m²TOTAL AREA INCLUDE ACCESS LEG: 470m²
380m²PROPOSED LOT 52
20.91
18.2
621
.31
17.9
4
39.0
414.36
18.3
21.1
17.88 4
TO BE REMOVED
REV A - SCALE CHANGED AND SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY ADDED
REV 0 - INITIAL RELEASE
TO B
E R
EM
OV
ED
R-CODE: R20/R25
PROPOSED LOTS: 2ORIGINAL LOTS: 1TOTAL AREA: 841m²LOCAL AUTHORITY: CITY OF FREMANTLE
SUBJECT TO CHANGE PENDING W.A.P.C CONDITIONS AND SURVEY
ORIGIN :
CAD 8209-01 WAPC.DWG
VER DATUM : AHD71ORIGIN : SEWER MH W8772 - LID
DATE 12/06/2015
Prepared for DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING
SCALE 1:300DWG SIZE A3SURVEYOR VU
F.B 1232/34REF 8209, 8210, 8211
C
AMENDMENTS
ROSSLAND & ARDY PTY LTDCONSULTING LICENSED SURVEYORS
177 RAILWAY PARADE, MAYLANDS 6051TEL 08 9272 2214 FAX 08 9370 3547
EMAIL [email protected]. 46 008 745 542
H
HORIZ DATUM : LOCAL
PLAN 8209-01REVISION D 12/10/2016
RL: 32.57
DB
YD
SE
WE
R
11321131
1143
LAWN
FIBRO FENCE
FIBRO SHED
TIN
FE
NC
ETI
N F
EN
CE
HARWOOD STREET
FIB
RO
FE
NC
E
LAWN
DR
IVE
WA
Y
LAWN LAWN
FOO
T P
ATH
VERANDAH
FL: 33.61
33
5023
.63
5 0 5 101:300 @ A3
3995
.34
2.39
C
PROPOSED GREEN TITLESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 1144, 1145 &1146 ON P6343(1). No. 15, 17 & 19HARWOOD STREET, HILTON.C/T: 2181-110, 2181-111, 2181-112
8.15
IOW
FL
G
No.15
Scale: 1:300 @ A3Drawn: J.K.ISSUED FOR INFORMATION16.02.171
NoteDateRevSUBDIVISON PLAN
15 Harwood Street, Hilton
TBM - SPRING HEADNAIL & PLATE
LEGEND
CLOTHESLINES
Description
TELSTRA PITELEC HOUSEHOLD CONNECTIONELEC CONSUMER POLEGAS METERGATESEWER IOTREEWATER METER
Symbol
C
G
IO
W
CONCRETE
BITUMEN
EDGE OF GUTTER
OVERHEAD POWER LINESEWER PIPE
019_hilt
on d
esig
n Co
mpe
titi
on 2
017
CONDITIONS AND SURVEYSUBJECT TO CHANGE PENDING W.A.P.C
LOCAL AUTHORITY: CITY OF FREMANTLETOTAL AREA: 905m²ORIGINAL LOTS: 1PROPOSED LOTS: 2
R-CODE: R20/R25
LOT 1143 - SEWER MH W8772 - LIDLOT 1131 - SEWER MH W8758 - LID
LEGEND
FENCELINE
O/HEAD POWER LINESEWER PIPE
EDGE OF GUTTER
L.C.R.W. - LOW CONC RETAINING WALL
L.B.P. - LOW BRICK PILLAR
CONCRETE
WALLS
PROPOSED SURVEY STRATASUBDIVISION OF LOT 1143 AND 1131ON P6343(1). No. 13 HARWOODSTREET & No.14 JOSLIN STREET,HILTON. C/T: 2181-109, 1575-293
REV 0 - INITIAL RELEASE
DescriptionCLOTHES LINETELSTRA PITELEC ANCHORELEC. POWER POLE
GATEPALMSEWER IOSEWER PITSHRUBBASKETBALL HOOPTREEWATER HYDRANTWATER METER
Symbol
C
EAEP
IOS
HWM
ORIGIN :
CAD 8213-04 WAPC.DWG
VER DATUM : AHD 71ORIGIN :
DATE 21/12/2016
Prepared for HOUSING AUTHORITY
SCALE 1:200DWG SIZE A3SURVEYOR VU
L.B 567/13F.B 1237/57
REF 8213
C
AMENDMENTS
ROSSLAND & ARDY PTY LTDCONSULTING LICENSED SURVEYORS
177 RAILWAY PARADE, MAYLANDS 6051TEL 08 9272 2214 FAX 08 9370 3547
EMAIL [email protected]. 46 008 745 542
H
HORIZ DATUM : LOCAL
PLAN 8213-04REVISION 0
Proposed NewCrossover
ProposedParking Area -
46m²
Outdoor LivingSpace36m²
Proposed Lot 2Total - 478m²
Access Leg - 103m²
ProposedLot 1
427m²
11.6
8
14.13
4.24
17.9
1
43.2
5
9.15
5.5
TO BE REMOVED
TO BE REMOVED
NURSERYTO BE REMOVED
GARDEN BED
36
35
34
11.0
2
SEWER 1.5 BGL
15.42
25.3
4
LAWNLAWN
NU
RSE
RY
SHEDTIMBER
STAIRS
SHEDTIN
TIN
FEN
CE TIN
FENC
E
TIN
FEN
CE
TIN FENCE
TIN
FEN
CE
TILE ROOF HOUSEFIBRO + BRICK &
VERANDAH
LAWN
FOOTPATH
FOO
TPATH
DR
IVEWAY
SHEDTIN
FOO
TPATH
LAWN
JOSLIN STREET
11321130
20.92TIN FENCE
WM
EPEA
C
6.22
NorthScale: 1:200 @ A3Drawn: J.K.ISSUED FOR INFORMATION20.02.171
NoteDateRev
SUBDIVISION PLAN14 Joslin Street, Hilton
PROPOSED LOT 92613m²
PROPOSED LOT 91492m²
16.623.5
20.12
13.62
60.3
5
29.9
30.4
5
4.24
26.9
TOTAL AREA INCLUDE ACCESS LEG: 722m²AREA OF ACCESS LEG: 109m²
32m²
OUTDOORLIVING AREA
PROPOSED
PARKINGPROPOSED
CLOTHESLINES
AMENDEDREV A - CLOTHESLINES ADDED AND BOUNDARYREV 0 - INITIAL RELEASE
ROAD SIGN
BRIC
K PA
VIN
G
BRIC
K PA
VIN
G
BED
GAR
DEN
TIN
FEN
CE
CONCRETE
BITUMEN
LEGEND
DBYD SEWER
TO B
E R
EMO
VED
FIBR
O F
ENC
E
ZINC SHED
LAWN
LAWN
TO BE REMOVEDGARDEN BED
TIN
FEN
CE
FIBRO FENCE
FIBR
O F
ENC
E
FOOTPATH
DR
IVEW
AY
LAWN
TO REMAINPATIO
TO BE REMOVED
TIN SHEDTO BE REMOVED
TO BE REMOVEDGATE
DBYD SEWER1012309
36
10
TO REMAIN
1066
LAWN
FIBR
O F
ENC
E
PAGET STREET
VERANDAH
TILE ROOF & FIBRO HOUSESINGLE STOREY
00.14
00.93
R-CODE: R20
PROPOSED LOTS: 2ORIGINAL LOTS: 1TOTAL AREA: 1214m²LOCAL AUTHORITY: CITY OF FREMANTLE
SUBJECT TO CHANGE PENDING W.A.P.C CONDITIONS AND SURVEY
ORIGIN :
CAD 8204-01 WAPC.DWG
VER DATUM : AHD71ORIGIN : SEWER MH V8120 - LID
DATE 20/07/2015
Prepared for DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING
SCALE 1:300DWG SIZE A3SURVEYOR VU
F.B 1232/50REF 8204
C
AMENDMENTS
ROSSLAND & ARDY PTY LTDCONSULTING LICENSED SURVEYORS
177 RAILWAY PARADE, MAYLANDS 6051TEL 08 9272 2214 FAX 08 9370 3547
EMAIL [email protected]. 46 008 745 542
H
HORIZ DATUM : LOCAL
PLAN 8204-01REV C - 31-01-2017
REV B - PROPOSED OUTDOOR LIVING,PARKING AREAS AND TRUNCATION ADDED
5 0 5 101:300 @ A3
EDGE OF EAVES
TELSTRA CABLE
OVERHEAD POWER LINE
DescriptionTELSTRA PITELEC HOUSEHOLDCONNECTIONELEC CONSUMER POLEGAS METERSEWER IOTREEWATER METER
SymbolC
GIO
W
E
IO
G
CC
W W
PROPOSED GREEN TITLESUBDIVISION OF LOT 1023 ONP6342(1). No. 57 PAGET STREET,HILTON.C/T: 2180/447
LAWN
X-OVER EXTENSION
REV C - BOUNDARIES AMENDED
1m Setback to containroof eaves within frontlot and comply withBuilding Codes ofAustralia for fireseparation
EXISTING X-OVER
NorthScale: 1:300 @ A3Drawn: J.K.ISSUED FOR INFORMATION30.01.171
NoteDateRev
57 Paget Street, HiltonPROPOSED SUBDIVISIONISSUED FOR INFORMATION17.02.172
W
IS
GE
C
Symbol
WATER METERTREETAPSEWER ISGAS METERELECT DOMEELEC CONSUMER POLEELEC HOUSEHOLD CONNECTIONTELSTRA PIT
Description
C
E WIS
G
REV D - 9/2/17PLAN 8203-01
HORIZ DATUM : LOCAL
H
A.B.N. 46 008 745 542EMAIL [email protected]
TEL 08 9272 2214 FAX 08 9370 3547177 RAILWAY PARADE, MAYLANDS 6051
CONSULTING LICENSED SURVEYORS ROSSLAND & ARDY PTY LTD
AMENDMENTS
CREF 8203F.B 1232/41
SURVEYOR VU DWG SIZE A3 SCALE 1:200
Prepared for DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING
DATE 29/06/2015
ORIGIN : SEWER MH W8731 - LIDVER DATUM : AHD71
CAD 8203-01 WAPC.DWG
ORIGIN :
CONDITIONS AND SURVEY
SUBJECT TO CHANGE PENDING W.A.P.C
LOCAL AUTHORITY: CITY OF FREMANTLETOTAL AREA: 817m²ORIGINAL LOTS: 1PROPOSED LOTS: 2
R-CODE: R20/R25
PROPOSED GREEN TITLESUBDIVISION OFLOT 1396 ON P6341. No. 93 SNOOKCRESCENT, HILTON.C/T: 2176-842
SNOOK CRESCENT
DR
IVEW
AY
VERANDAH
SINGLE STOREYTILE ROOF & TIMBER HOUSE
TIN FENCE
LAWN
FOOT PATH
DBYD SEWER
LAWN
FOO
T PATH
LAWN
28
DBYD SEWER
18.21
811
23.5
9
1395
LEGEND
TIN FENCE
FIBR
O F
ENC
E
TIM
BER
FEN
CE
TIN
FEN
CE
TIN
FEN
CE
TIN FENCE
TIM
BER
FEN
CE
HO
USE
WAL
L
TIM
BER
FEN
CE
REV 0 - INITIAL RELEASE
100
REV A - SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY ADDED
TO REMAIN
3 15.21
21.3
1
18.3
1
PROPOSED LOT 82
PROPOSED LOT 81320m 2
4.24
TO REMAIN
44.9
SEWER PIPEOVERHEAD POWER LINE
EDGE OF EAVESRETAINING WALL
BITUMEN
CONCRETE
BITUMEN
CONCRETE
12.21
CO
NC
. PAD
TO
BE
REM
OVE
D
REV B - CLOTHESLINES ADDED AND BOUNDARYAMENDED
5 0 5 1:200 @ A3
CLOTHESLINES
TOTAL AREA INCLUDE ACCESS LEG: 497m²AREA OF ACCESS LEG: 68m²
429m 2
REV C - PROPOSED OUTDOOR LIVING & PARKING AREAS ADDED
2PROPOSEDOUTDOORLIVING AREA30m
PROPOSEDPARKING
PROPOSED NEWX-OVER
TREE TO REMAIN
REV D - SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY ADDED
NorthScale: 1:200 @ A3Drawn: J.K.ISSUED FOR INFORMATION10.11.161
NoteDateRev
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION93 Snook Crescent, Hilton
FOR DISCUSSION ONLYISSUED FOR INFORMATION11.11.162ISSUED FOR INFORMATION06.02.173ISSUED FOR INFORMATION17.02.174
14 JOSLIN STREET SNOOK CRESCENT57 PAGET STREET
ATTACHMENT 3 DEVELOPMENT SITEs
020_hilt
on d
esig
n Co
mpe
titi
on 2
017
W
IOE
G
CSymbol
WATER METERTREESEWER IOPOWER POLEGAS METERELEC HOUSEHOLD CONNECTIONTELSTRA PITDescription
C
E
G
W
IO
33. 0 0
REV G - 29/08/16PLAN 8206-01
HORIZ DATUM : LOCAL
H
A.B.N. 46 008 745 542EMAIL [email protected]
TEL 08 9272 2214 FAX 08 9370 3547177 RAILWAY PARADE, MAYLANDS 6051
CONSULTING LICENSED SURVEYORS ROSSLAND & ARDY PTY LTD
AMENDMENTS
CREF 8206F.B 1232/39
SURVEYOR VUDWG SIZE A3 SCALE 1:200
Prepared for DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING
DATE 22/06/2015
ORIGIN : SEWER MH W8772 - LIDVER DATUM : AHD 71
CAD 8206-01 WAPC.DWG
ORIGIN :
CONDITIONS AND SURVEYSUBJECT TO CHANGE PENDING W.A.P.C
LOCAL AUTHORITY: CITY OF FREMANTLETOTAL AREA: 804m²ORIGINAL LOTS: 1PROPOSED LOTS: 2
R-CODE: R20/R25HARWOOD STREET
PROPOSED GREEN TITLESUBDIVISION OFLOT 1652 ON P6341. No. 28 HARWOODSTREET, HILTON.C/T: 2176-857
DR
IVEW
AY
VERANDAH
SINGLE STOREYTILE ROOF, TIMBER & FIBRO HOUSE
FIBR
O F
ENC
E
LAWN
TIMBER FENCE
TIN
FEN
CE
LOW
BR
ICK
WAL
L
LEGEND
1653 1651
16371636
1638
40.6
20.16
LAWN
LAWN
LAWN
MET
AL F
ENC
E
1.8m
HIG
H B
RIC
K W
ALL
FOOT PATH
FOO
T PA
TH
FIBR
O F
ENC
E
DBYD SEWER
REV A - SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY ADDED
TO REMAIN
TO REMAIN
DR
IVEW
AY
515.12
21.6
17.1
13.62
17.7
3
4.24
PROPOSED LOT 34
PROPOSED LOT 33353m 2
370m 2
TOTAL AREA INCLUDE ACCESS LEG451m
2
AREA OF ACCESS LEG: 81m²
FL
TBM - DECK SPIKERL: 32.57
FL: 33.76FL
TBM - DECK SPIKERL: 32.57
BITUMEN
CONCRETE
OVERHEAD POWER LINEEDGE OF GUTTER
FL: 33.76
AMENDED
5 0 5 1:200 @ A3
REV B - CLOTHESLINES ADDED AND BOUNDARY
CLOTHESLINES
PROPOSED OUTDOOR
LIVING AREA30m²
PROPOSED PARKING
AREAS AND TRUNCATION ADDEDREV C - PROPOSED OUTDOOR LIVING, PARKING
2.12
DR
IVEW
AYPR
OPO
SED
REV D - LOT SIZES AMENDED
0.4
REV E - LOT SIZES AMENDED & BUILDING OFFSET ADDED
REV F - CARRIAGEWAY EASEMENT EDITED
PARKINGPROPOSED
REV G - CARRIAGEWAY EASEMENT REMOVEDPROPOSED PARKING MOVED
NorthScale: 1:200 @ A3Drawn: J.K.ISSUED FOR INFORMATION17.02.171
NoteDateRev
SUBDIVISION PLAN28 Harwood Street, Hilton
28 HARWOOD STREET 26 GRIGG PLACE 16 NICHOLAS CRESCENT
SHN
E
IS
C
W
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
//
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
//
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
/
//
//
//
//
//
/
/
//
//
/
//
//
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
FL
G33.00
REV C 23/01/2017
PLAN 7935-01
HORIZ DATUM : LOCAL
PROPOSED GREEN TITLESUBDIVISION OF LOT 48 ON DP 67762.No. 26 GRIGG PLACE, HILTON.C/T: 2763/834
H
A.B.N. 46 008 745 542EMAIL [email protected]
TEL 08 9272 2214 FAX 08 9370 3547177 RAILWAY PARADE, MAYLANDS 6051
CONSULTING LICENSED SURVEYORS ROSSLAND & ARDY PTY LTD
AMENDMENTS
CREF 7935F.B 1232/65
SURVEYOR VU DWG SIZE A3 SCALE 1:200
Prepared for DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING
DATE 22/07/2015
ORIGIN : SEWER MH V8761 - LIDVER DATUM : AHD 71
CAD 7935-01 WAPC.DWG
ORIGIN :
CONDITIONS AND SURVEYSUBJECT TO CHANGE PENDING W.A.P.C
LOCAL AUTHORITY: CITY OF FREMANTLETOTAL AREA: 1806m²ORIGINAL LOTS: 1PROPOSED LOTS: 4
R-CODE: R20
REV 0 - INITIAL RELEASE
W
S
EG
CSymbol
WATER METERTREESEWER PITSEWER ISPOWER POLEGAS METER
ELEC HOUSEHOLD CONNECTIONTELSTRA PITDescription
LEGEND
GRIGG PLACE
BITUMEN
CONCRETE
LAWN
DR
IVEW
AY
SINGLE STOREYTILE ROOF & FIBRO HOUSE
TO REMAIN
PROPOSED LOT 72405m 2
PROPOSED LOT 73391m
TOTAL AREA INCLUDE ACCESS LEG: 474m²AREA OF ACCESS LEG: 83m²
2
SHEDFIBRO
TO BE REMOVED
VERANDAH
LAWN
LAWN
1480
1478
1481
FIBRO
FENC
E
FIBRO FENCE
FIBRO FENCE
FOO
TPAT
H
47.7
FL: 34.1
11.1
1
6.17
3
S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SEWER PIPEWATER PIPEGAS PIPEO/H POWER LINESTELSTRA CABLES
EDGE OF EAVES
IS
FIBRO
FENC
E
REV A - CLOTHESLINES ADDED
5 0 5 1:200 @ A3
REV B - PROPOSED OUTDOOR
LIVING & PARKING AREAS ADDED
EXIS
TIN
G
TO R
EMAI
N
ALL TREES TO BE RETAINED DR
IVEW
AYPR
OPO
SED
12.1226
23.381424.8814
14.5990
4.1401
17.2325
1.775120.7205 5.6929
21.1142
22.6142
PRO
POSED
OU
TDO
OR
LIVING
AREA 30m
0.503.28
4.00
CLOTHESLINES
REV C - LOT LAYOUT AMENDED
2.051.00
NorthScale: 1:200 @ A3Drawn: J.K.ISSUED FOR INFORMATION08.08.161
NoteDateRev
26 Grigg Place, HiltonISSUED FOR INFORMATION09.09.162ISSUED FOR INFORMATION21.12.163
SUBDIVISION PLAN ISSUED FOR INFORMATION20.02.174
ATTACHMENT 3_DEVELOPMENT SITES
021_hilt
on d
esig
n Co
mpe
titi
on 2
017
ATTACHMENT 4 entry form
HILTON DESIGN COMPETITION ENTRY FORM
Company/Team Name:
Name of Registered West Australian Architect(s):
Registration Number(s):
Names of team member(s) Qualification(s) Phone Email
Signature Confirming Acceptance of Competition Terms and Conditions
1
2
3
4
5
Contact Person Preferred Contact Method Date
Top Related