1
Fire Safety Audits in CrewhotelsFollow up 2004
Presentation at the EAGOSH-Meeting in Seeheim on 17. Nov. 2004by Joachim Klaus, Lufthansa, Safety Engineer Flight Operationsphone +49 69 696 3473fax +49 69 696 2842E-Mail: [email protected]
Summary of the presentation heldon EAGOSH-Meeting May 2001
• What do hotelguests expect ?• Examples on hotelfires• Hotelfires in the U.S.• Lufthansa firesafety concept based on 4 issues.• Firesafety audits
2
What do hotelguests expect ?
It is striking that fire safety is not mentioned as topic amongthe nine most frequent items.
Half / full board
Television in room
Spacious room
Restaurant in hotel
Helpful staff
Telephone in room
Breakfast buffet
Quiet location
Shower/bath, WC 60
59
58
57
56
55
53
52
54 Evaluation ona point scale, max.nr. of points 60
!Survey by DEHOGA / Source: Focus 1999
Hotelfire Sheraton Heliopolis Cairo01. March 1990
18 deaths and 70 injured
3
Serious hotel fires in recent years
Year Deaths Injured
"Royal Jomtien", Pattaja 1997 92 64Kurhotel, Tegernsee 1997 1 25Hotel "Tozbey", Istanbul 1996 17 41Hotel "Imperial, Philippines 1997 27 20
Source: Allianz
Hotelfires in the US
A survey in the US covering the years 1987 - 1996 revealedan average of 6250 fireswith 35 deaths, 351 injuredand property damage amounting to$ 68 million per year.
4
Lufthansa Crew accommodation
In the year 2000 Lufthansa Crews hadabout 878.000 accommodations in 120 Crewhotels allover the world.
Fire safety concept forLufthansa Crews
! Trainingfilm! Brochure
"How to act in case of hotel fire"! Dräger escape hood! Fire Safety Audits in Crewhotels
5
! Trainingfilm"Emergency Exit -How to act in case of Hotel Fire" is shown in the groundcoarse of theemergency training
Fire safety concept forLufthansa Crews
! Brochure"How to act in case of hotel fire" ishanded over to all staff and availablevia Intranet
Fire safety concept forLufthansa Crews
6
Fire safety concept forLufthansa Crews
! Dräger escape hood is used byDLH-Crews since many years
Fire safety concept forLufthansa Crews
! Fire Safety Audits performed withchecklists based on theAnnex Technical Guidelines of therecommendation of the council86/666/EU
7
Occupational Safety Flight Operations
Regulations and recommendations
Germany:VdS 2082, 10/1987 (Hotels and Hotel Establishments)GastBauV Bayern (Hotel and Restaurant Building
Regulations)ZH 1/36 (BGR 110) (Safety Regulations
Restaurants and Hotels)
USA:
PL 101-391 (Hotel and Motel Fire Safety act)Europe:
86/666/EEC (Recommendation of the Councilon Fire safety in existing hotels)
Occupational Safety Flight Operations
Recommendation of the council86/666/EECAim and means of ensuring safety in hotels:
• reduce the risk of fire breaking out
• prevent the spread of flames and smoke
• ensure that all occupants can beevacuated safely
• enable the emergency services to takeaction
8
Occupational Safety Flight Operations
Recommendation 86/666/EECTo meet these objectives, all necessaryprecautions shall be taken:• safe and clearly marked escape routes• building's structural stability in the event of fire• presence of flammable material limited• appropriate systems for alerting occupants• safety instructions and plan of escape routes
in each room• emergency firefighting equipment• staff is given suitable instruction and training
Paragraph 8 Fire Safety:(a) (...)(b) The Hotel shall allow DLH to inspect fire-fightingEquipment, emergency exits and staircases, and hotel fire safety procedures at regular intervals(c) (...)
(d) The "ANNEX TECHNICAL GUIDELINES" handedover to the Hotel is part of this Agreement insofaras these fire precautions are not yet realized at theHotel in a respective kind. (...)
Firesafety as a part of the contract:
In practise 1
9
In practise 2
! Before a contract is signed between a Hotel and DLH a firesafety checklist is filled in.
! Safety engineer checks content and gives assistance to DLH accommodation department
! After a hotel has been chosen and is getting used forCrewaccommodation the feedback from the crews ischecked by our Flightreportingsystem
! In urgent cases Safety engineer performs a riskanalysisby inspecting the hotel and interviewing Hotelmanager
In practise 3
10
In practise 3
In practise 3
11
In practise 4
Auswertung der Hotelchecklisten Selbstaudit FRA PX/F
Beanstandungskategorien
lfd.Nr.
Checkdatum(mm/jj)
Destination Hotel
1. E
vaku
ieru
ngsw
ege
2. B
aum
erkm
ale
3. W
andv
erkl
eidu
ngen
, etc
.
4. E
lekt
r. B
eleu
chtu
ng
5. L
üftu
ngss
yste
m
6. E
rste
Hilf
e, W
arn-
/Ala
rm-
a
nlag
en, S
iche
rhei
ts-
b
estim
mun
gen
1. 12/00 ALA Hyatt Regency 12. 07/03 AMS Carlton Square X X X 13. 11/02 ARN Radisson SAS Hotel Gillet Uppsala 14. 03/03 ASB Nissa Hotel X 15. 11/00 ATH Divani Apollon Palace X X 16. 05/00 ATL Atlanta Marquis X 17. 05/03 AUH Hilton X 18. 07/03 BCN Hotel Princesa Sofia X 19. 05/01 BEG Intercontinental Beograd 1
10. 06/03 BHX Crowne Plaza Birmingham City X X X 111. 08/03 BIO Indautxu Bilbao Spain X X 112. 04/01 BJS Kempinski Hotel Beijing Lufthansa Center X 113. 04/01 BKK Central Grand Plaza X 114. 05/03 BLR The Oberoi Hotel X X 115. 04/01 BOM Hotel Oberoi Towers 116. 11/00 BOS Swissôtel Boston 117. 12/00 BRE Marriott X 118. 04/01 BRU Sofitel Brussels 119. 04/01 BUD Kempinski Hotel Corvinus X X 1
In practise 4
38%
58%
4%
111total number :
4no feedback
65with
differences
42without
differences
12
Experiences with safety audits
Concerns:• extra work for the administration
• selfaudit is not filled in truely by the hotel
• european standard is not useful worldwide• ...
Thanks for your attention