ENHANCING FORM 3 STUDENTS’ SPELLING ABILITY THROUGH
THE USE OF SPELLING GAME
LYDIA CHAI YEE XUAN
UNIVERSITI PENDIDIKAN SULTAN IDRIS
2014
ENHANCING FORM 3 STUDENTS’ SPELLING ABILITY
THROUGH THE USE OF SPELLING GAME
LYDIA CHAI YEE XUAN
RESEARCH REPORT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT
OF THE REQUIREMENTS
FOR THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF EDUCATION
(TEACHING OF ENGLISH AS SECOND LANGUAGE)
FACULTY OF LANGUAGES AND COMMUNICATION
UNIVERSITI PENDIDIKAN SULTAN IDRIS
2014
i
DECLARATION
I hereby declare that the work in this research paper is my own except for the
quotations and summaries which I have duly acknowledged.
Signature: __________________________
Name: Lydia Chai Yee Xuan
Matric No: D20102039955
Date: ______________________________
ii
Table of Contents
Declaration ............................................................................................................................ i
Table of Contents ................................................................................................................. ii
List of Tables ....................................................................................................................... v
List of Figures .................................................................................................................... vii
List of Abbreviations ........................................................................................................ viii
Abstract ............................................................................................................................... ix
Abstrak ................................................................................................................................. x
1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Reflection on Teaching Experience ................................................................... 2
1.2 Related Theory/Literature .................................................................................. 4
1.2.1 The Nature of English Spelling ........................................................... 4
1.2.2 Difficulties Faced in Learning Spelling .............................................. 6
1.2.3 Word Study ......................................................................................... 7
1.2.4 Stages of Spelling Development ......................................................... 8
1.2.5 Spelling Game ..................................................................................... 8
2.0 FOCUS OF INVESTIGATION/ISSUE OF CONCERN ............................................ 11
2.1 Problem Statement ........................................................................................... 11
2.2 Preliminary Investigation ................................................................................. 11
2.2.1 Pre-spelling Test ............................................................................... 12
2.2.2 Questionnaire .................................................................................... 12
2.3 Analysis of Preliminary Investigation.............................................................. 13
2.3.1 Interpreting Pre-spelling Test Result ................................................ 13
iii
2.3.2 Interpreting Questionnaire ................................................................ 16
Theme 1: Ability to Spell New Words Correctly .......................... 17
Theme 2: Strategies Used in Spelling New Words ........................ 18
2.4 Criteria of Selection ......................................................................................... 20
2.5 Definition of Terms .......................................................................................... 21
2.5.1 Enhancing ......................................................................................... 21
2.5.2 Spelling Ability ................................................................................. 21
2.5.3 Spelling Game ................................................................................... 21
3.0 OBJECTIVE/RESEARCH QUESTIONS ................................................................... 21
4.0 TARGET GROUP/PARTICIPANTS .......................................................................... 22
5.0 ACTION ...................................................................................................................... 23
5.1 Procedure of Action ......................................................................................... 23
5.1.1 Pre-intervention ................................................................................. 24
5.1.2 Intervention ....................................................................................... 25
5.1.3 Post-intervention ............................................................................... 24
5.2 Data Gathering Methods .................................................................................. 31
5.2.1 Participants’ Personal Spelling Journals ........................................... 24
5.2.2 Field Notes ........................................................................................ 32
5.2.3 Post-spelling Test .............................................................................. 33
6.0 DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION ......................................................... 33
6.1 Interpreting Participants’ Personal Spelling Journals ...................................... 23
Theme 1: Perception towards Spelling Game ............................................ 34
Theme 2: Learning Words via Spelling Game........................................... 39
6.2 Field Notes ....................................................................................................... 40
iv
Theme 1: Participants’ Mispronunciation .................................................. 40
Theme 2: Problems Faced by Participants during Spelling Game............. 41
Theme 3: The Effectiveness of Collaboration in Spelling Game .............. 41
6.3 Interpreting Post-spelling Test Result .............................................................. 45
7.0 FINDINGS ................................................................................................................... 47
8.0 LIMITATIONS ............................................................................................................ 49
9.0 SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH ........................................................ 49
10.0 CONCLUSION .......................................................................................................... 50
REFERENCES .................................................................................................................. 51
APPENDICES
Appendix A Questionnaire ................................................................................. 58
Appendix B (i) Onset and rime worksheet for Intervention 1................................. 59
Appendix B (ii) Onset and rime worksheet for Intervention 2................................. 60
Appendix B (iii) Onset and rime worksheet for Intervention 3................................. 61
Appendix B (iv) Onset and rime worksheet for Intervention 4................................. 62
Appendix C (i) Field Notes for Intervention 1 ........................................................ 63
Appendix C (ii) Field Notes for Intervention 2 ........................................................ 65
Appendix C (iii) Field Notes for Intervention 3 ........................................................ 67
Appendix C (iv) Field Notes for Intervention 4 ........................................................ 69
Table A1 Participants’ Pre-spelling Test Word Analysis .............................. 71
Table A2 Participants’ Personal Spelling Journal Entries ............................. 73
Table A3 Participants’ Personal Post-spelling Test Word Analysis in
Relation to Pre-spelling Test Word Analysis ............................... 79
v
List of Tables
Table 1 Differences between Word Study and Traditional Spelling ........................ 8
Table 2 Two Variations of Look, Say, Cover, Write, Check .................................. 10
Table 3 Participants’ Pre-spelling Test Result ........................................................ 14
Table 4 Categorization of Participants’ Errors........................................................ 16
Table 5 Thematic Analysis: Ability to Spell New Words Correctly ...................... 17
Table 6 Thematic Analysis: Strategies Used in Spelling New Words .................... 18
Table 7 Procedure of Action ................................................................................... 24
Table 8 Participants’ Pair List ................................................................................ 26
Table 9 List of Words Learned for the Four Interventions .................................... 30
Table 10 Onset and Rime Covered in the Four Interventions ................................... 30
Table 11 Thematic Analysis: Positive Perception towards Spelling Game in
Intervention 1 ............................................................................................ 35
Table 12 Thematic Analysis: Positive Perception towards Spelling Game in
Intervention 2 ............................................................................................ 35
Table 13 Thematic Analysis: Positive Perception towards Spelling Game in
Intervention 3 ............................................................................................ 36
Table 14 Thematic Analysis: Positive Perception towards Spelling Game in
Intervention 4 ............................................................................................ 36
Table 15 Thematic Analysis: Negative Perception towards Spelling Game ............ 37
Table 16 Reasons of Participants who Like the Spelling Game ............................... 38
Table 17 Thematic Analysis: Learning Words via Spelling Game .......................... 39
Table 18 Thematic Analysis: Participants’ Mispronunciation .................................. 41
vi
Table 19 Thematic Analysis: Problems Faced by Students During Spelling Game 42
Table 20 Thematic Analysis: Unexpected Participants’ Behaviors .......................... 42
Table 21 Thematic Analysis: Sudden Disrupt Impact .............................................. 43
Table 22 Thematic Analysis: The Effectiveness of Collaboration in
Spelling Game (a) ..................................................................................... 44
Table 23 Thematic Analysis: The Effectiveness of Collaboration in
Spelling Game (b) ..................................................................................... 44
Table 24 Comparisons between Pre and Post-spelling Test Results and Gain ........ 45
vii
List of Figures
Figure 1 Positioning of Player 1 and Player 2 during Spelling Game ..................... 27
Figure 2 Process of Spelling Game .......................................................................... 29
viii
List of Abbreviations
L1 First language
L2 English as Second Language
SMS Short Message Service
ix
Abstract
Spelling is an important skill which students must acquire before they could excel in the
speaking, listening, reading and writing skills. The use of spelling game was found to be
successful in enhancing the spelling ability of 10 self-volunteered Form 3 action research
participants. They are students living in the rural area whereby English language is not
their first language. Spelling game also had helped these participants to memorize words’
spelling. Although they did not manage to memorize all of the words exposed during the
intervention sessions, they could still manage to memorize at least some of them. The
spelling game applied the concept of a combination of techniques from the Look, Say,
Cover, Write, Check and Elkonin Boxes. In analyzing the quantitative data such as the
pre and post-spelling test result, the statistical analysis was used. On the other hand when
analyzing the qualitative data such as the questionnaire, participants’ personal spelling
journals and researcher’s field notes, the thematic analysis was used. Based on the result
obtained from the pre and post-spelling test, these participants had shown improvement in
their ability to spell after they had undergone four times of interventions. To conclude, the
spelling game is a successful and interesting alternative to improve students’ spelling
ability.
Keywords: spelling game, spelling ability, memorize words’ spelling
x
Abstrak
Kemahiran mengeja adalah sangat penting dan mesti dikuasai sebelum pelajar dapat
menguasai kemahiran bertutur, mendengar, membaca dan menulis. Penggunaan
permainan mengeja didapati berjaya dalam mengukuhkan kemahiran mengeja dalam
kalangan 10 orang Tingkatan 3 sukarelawan peserta kajian tindakan. Mereka merupakan
pelajar yang tinggal di kawasan pedalaman di mana Bahasa Inggeris bukan merupakan
bahasa pertama mereka. Permainan mengeja turut membantu para peserta untuk
menghafal ejaan perkataan. Walaupun mereka tidak dapat menghafal semua perkataan
yang didedahkan semasa sesi-sesi intervensi, mereka masih mampu menghafal
sekurang-kurangnya sebahagian daripada tersebut. Permainan mengeja telah
mengamalkan kombinasi konsep yang terdapat dalam teknik Lihat, Cakap, Tutup, Tulis,
Semak dan Kotak Elkonin. Semasa menganalisa data kuantitatif seperti ujian ejaan
sebelum dan selepas, analisa statistik dipraktikkan. Apabila menganalisa data kualitatif
seperti soal selidik, jurnal mengeja para peserta dan nota bidang, analisa thematic pula
dipraktikkan. Berdasarkan kepada keputusan yang diperolehi dalam ujian mengeja
sebelum dan selepas, para peserta telah menunjukkan peningkatan dalam kemahiran
mengeja selepas menjalani empat kali intervensi. Secara kesimpulannya, penggunaan
permainan mengeja adalah sebuah alternatif yang berjaya dan menarik dalam memajukan
kemahiran mengeja bagi para pelajar.
Kata kunci: permainan mengeja, kemahiran mengeja, menghafal ejaan perkataan
1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The undertaking of this research project was in accordance with one of the anticipated
student aspirations from the Malaysian Blueprint (2012) that every child can obtain
bilingual proficiency whereby they should be able to work in both Bahasa Malaysia
and English language environment upon leaving school. Proficiency in a language is
inclusive of the mastery of language for informational and interpersonal purposes.
Spelling is an influencing factor as it helps to build fluency and automaticity which
facilitate reading and writing skills (Hook & Jones, 2009).
Nowadays, many students have problems in writing because they are not able
to spell words correctly (Meriem, 2010). Poor in spelling is one of the most common
academic difficulties experienced by students and the problem prolongs from one
generation to the next generation getting more and more serious (Helen & Weiss, n.d.).
Frey & Fisher (2005) claim that lesson focusing on spelling is essential so that
students can read and write. Scott (2010) confirms that spelling carries an impact on
the quality of student writing, but at the same time, it helps students to understand
how words work at the level of sound, structure and meaning. Good spelling is critical
for literacy and it makes writing much easier (Joshi, R. M., Treiman, R. ,Carreker, &
Moats, 2008). Hence, the researcher believes that it is important to master the spelling
skill first in order to master the other major skills of English.
According to Jeani Shinta Rahayu (2009), a majority of the students feel
burdened when learning vocabulary in class because their teacher does not provide
them a good technique to memorize the words. Indeed, many students are not exposed
to the right strategy of how to spell as school teachers usually overlook the importance
of spelling. Consequently, students develop incorrect application of strategies which
2
result in poor spelling phenomenon. There is also possibility that students have lack of
interest or the presence of undesirable attitudes towards spelling instruction (Adams-
Gordon, 2010).
1.1 Reflection on Teaching Experience
The researcher taught a class of Form 3 students with low proficiency level in English.
They are weak in remembering new words and poor in spelling common words
correctly. Being Form 3 students, the researcher anticipated them to be able to
recognize and spell the common words correctly. However, after carrying out a few
activities with them, the researcher noticed that they were not up to her expectation.
Therefore, she decided to carry out an action research aiming to improve their spelling
ability.
Based on the researcher’s experience teaching the students for five weeks,
students failed to spell words correctly. For example, when she asked them to write
short notes at the end of the lesson asking for their feedback regarding her teaching,
students wrote with gross spelling errors for common words such as “funny” (funy)
and “teach” (teech). She suspected this happened due to their lack of knowledge on
how to spell those words correctly. When she asked students to do homework, they
tend to misspell words. They would omit certain alphabets in the word. For instance,
many of them wrote “sacrifices” (sacrifies). This could be due to their ignorance while
copying what is right. When she conducted a listening task by asking students to write
down the words that she read out aloud, most of them spelt “patriotism” (patriotisme).
This was clearly an impact due to their first language (L1) influence.
Upon noticing students’ problems in spelling words correctly, the researcher
did reflect on her own teaching to see if this happened due to her incompetent way of
3
teaching or giving instructions. She constantly reminded herself to be cautious in
spelling words that she wrote on the board or typed on the handouts. A spelling
mistake done by the teacher can lead to bad modeling to students. It can be described
to be ‘contagious’ as it will not only affect one student but many at one time. Once the
mistake has been planted into students’ memory, it is difficult to correct and erase off
completely. Therefore, it is better to avoid any chance or possibility for such incident
to occur. In spite of her confidence of not making any mistakes on her part, there must
be a rational explanation to the spelling errors done by those students. One of the very
possible explanations for that could be due to her handwriting on the white board.
Maybe that was the exact reason which caused students to misspell certain words. She
was truthfully not used to writing on the white board with a marker pen.
The researcher also attempted to seek students’ feedback for identifying why
they made such spelling errors. One day, she decided to ask them immediately after
they finished copying. Sadly, students did not give her much feedback but only smiled
and took back their books to do the corrections. In another case, some students
responded that they heard her pronouncing the word as /pætriətɪzmə/ instead of
/pætriətɪzəm/. However, she was very sure that she did not pronounce it the way they
thought she did. It was possible that these students were trying to intentionally be
mischievous by accusing her of mispronunciation. Nevertheless, external factor such
as environment issue could be a cause for students’ misheard of pronunciation. The
classroom windows were wide open and there were noises coming from outside of the
classroom.
Other than asking students, the researcher also asked their previous English
language teacher, Madam J, regarding the students’ ability in spelling. Madam J
agreed that they are weak and poor in spelling. She commented that, “many of them
4
are reluctant to learn the correct spelling”. Likewise to the researcher’s encounter,
students tend to do a lot of spelling errors in their homework. According to Madam J,
students have the bad habit of copying their friend’s homework. As a result, it made
identification and tracking difficult. Some students may be too lazy or ignorant to
complete the homework on their own. Hence, when students copy from one another,
the teacher could only assume that most of the students shared the same spelling
problem.
1.2 Related Theory/Literature
This review focused on the Spelling Game intervention and the paradigm involved in
this action research. The purpose of reviewing was to enhance current understanding
of issues, theories and processes of the research topic.
1.2.1 The Nature of English Spelling
Based on the study done by Kemmer (2009), English has an alphabetic writing system
based on the Roman alphabet that was brought to Anglo-Saxon England by Christian
missionaries and church officials in the 600s. Spelling is made up of the components
of phonology and orthography (Ravid , 2011). In accordance to Ravid’s definition,
Kemmer explains that alphabetic writing systems are based on the principle of
symbolizing spoken sound segments, uniquely to those at the level of consonants and
vowels, by written characters, ideally one for each sound segment.
The presence of knowledge of phonetic, visual, morphemic and etymological
determines whether how proficient a speller is. According to Antenucci et al. (2011),
proficient spellers use all four types of spelling knowledge when they are writing
known and unfamiliar words. On the other hand, beginning writers rely a lot on
5
phonetic strategies because they do not yet know a lot about written language (Topfer,
n.d.).
For English, despite having specific rules, not all of them are to be followed
strictly as there are many exceptional rules at the same time which create confusion.
As indicated by Maddox (n.d.), one of the aspects of the English alphabets that leads
to misunderstanding about English orthography is the 26 letters of the English
alphabet which are inadequate to represent the 44 or so sounds used to speak the
English language. As a continuation of the explanation given by Maddox, the written
English has compensated for this lack of letters by creating “extra letters” to
symbolize eight consonant sounds and seven vowel sounds that do not have letters of
their own.
Sangay Jamtsho (2014) describes the English spelling as the “most
complicated” among other languages. Okrent (2013) also agrees and compares
English spelling as “a cruel prank” for learning kids and even adults. Harbeck (2013)
describes English spelling as “terrible” and “crazy” because even natives find
difficulty in it. During the 18th
century, a prominent Irish playwright, George Bernard
Shaw has facetiously proposed the perfectly regular rule-governed spelling of the
word “fish” as “ghoti” with “gh” pronounced as in “laugh”, “o” as in “women” and “ti”
as in “nation” (Zimmer, 2008; Pod Academy, 2014; Kessler & Treiman, 2003; Sangay
Jamtsho, 2014). Therefore, Shaw critiques the English spelling as “chaotic and
unprincipled”.
However, there are writers who opposed Shaw’s idea that English spelling is
chaotic and unprincipled with various rationales (Ahmad Al-Hassan, n.d.; Maddox,
n.d.; Kessler & Treiman, 2003; Hayes, Kessler, & Treiman, 2005). Hayes et al. (2005)
6
provide an answer to the argument of irregular spelling rules which is one of the main
difficulties faced: obtain knowledge about conservatism, loan-words and how English
spellings represent more than just pronunciation.
According to Antenucci et al. (2011), the nature of spelling has been
influenced by technology including mobile phones, emails and social networking texts.
This is true due to the introduction of Short Message Service (SMS) speak which uses
simplified spelling of words. As a result in the study done by Freudenberg (2009), a
number of SMS speak features were indeed present in both the English native and
second language high school learners formal written work; indicating that SMS speak
did have some impact on the written work of these learners, which could in turn be
attributed to the high frequency of their SMS usage.
1.2.2 Difficulties Faced in Learning Spelling
In the process of learning spelling, there are certainly some obstacles which must be
overcome. In this report, two difficulties are discussed. They are first language
influence and poor in listening for pronunciation.
According to Odlin [as cited in James, C., & Klein, K. (n.d.)], a similarity in
writing systems can reduce the amount of time needed to learn to encode and decode
written symbols in a second language. However, it is unavoidable to omit the fact that
partial but not complete overlap in writing conventions will cause difficulty for the
user to acquire the skill. In other words, influence from the first language can be
positive and also negative at the same time.
Studies analysed by Fender (as cited in Saigh & Schmitt, 2012) have shown
that L2 learners’ literacy spelling skill is one of those being influenced by the different
writing systems of their respective L1’s. According to Wachowicz & Scott (as cited in
7
Al-Saudi, 2013), a common mistake done by ESL learners is to interpret some
combinations of characters with similar pattern of spelling rules from another
language.
Al-Saudi (2013) comments that students failed to identify pronunciation that
they heard when they spell out the words. As supported by Stirling (2003), poor
listening is seen as a limitation to spelling. It is possible that these students are
categorized as gifted visual spatial learner, whereby they face weakness in auditory
sequential processing (Sword, 2003). This type of learners is more prone to visual
learning.
1.2.3 Word Study
Bear et al. (2009) defines Word Study as the integration of phonics, spelling, and
vocabulary instruction that teaches students how to look closely at words to discover
the regularities and conventions of English orthography, or spelling. Leipzig (2000)
argues that it is an alternative to traditional spelling instruction which is based on
learning word patterns rather than memorizing by hard unconnected words. Zutell
finds that it is a form of cohesive approach that addresses word recognition,
vocabulary and phonics as well as spelling (as cited in Leipgzig, 2000).
Based on the presentation done by Halmond & Hodonicky (2014), they
compared and distinguished the significant main differences between Word Study and
Traditional Spelling (refer to Table 1):
8
Table 1
Differences between Word Study and Traditional Spelling
Word Study Traditional Spelling
Small group facilitated skill
instruction
Whole group skill instruction
Hands-on learning and
self-discovery based
Rote drill and memorization
Student centered constructivist
learning
Repeated practice
Authentic repeated practice: Small
group, Partner work,
Independently
Note. Adapted from Halmond, & Hodonicky. (2014). Word Study vs. Spelling. Retrieved from
http://www.naperville203.org/Page/4052
1.2.4 Stages of Spelling Development
There are five stages in the spelling development as reported by Gentry (as cited in
Lutz, 1986): precommunicative, semiphonetic, phonetic, transitional and correct
stages. Tompkins (2014) further affirms that to become good spellers, students require
to learn about the English orthographic system and move through the stages of
spelling development.
1.2.5 Spelling Game
To improve students’ spelling skill, Spelling Game was chosen as the intervention.
This intervention is supported by Al Neyadi (2007) who claims that learning new
vocabulary through enjoyable and out of the ordinary ways have the tendency to help
the children to learn vocabulary better.
Bafile (2012) agrees with the effectiveness of using game to teach spelling.
Dripple (n.d.) believes that spelling word games are very motivating and encourages
9
students to learn through the use of strategies, providing immediate feedback and
encouraging teamwork.
According to Topfer (n.d.), developing letter-sound knowledge could be
obtained through the acquisition of onset and rime. Onset is the initial consonant in a
one-syllable word whereas rime includes the remaining sounds after the onset,
including the vowel and any sounds that follow (Holl, n.d.). A continued explanation
given by Topfer is that the knowledge of phonemic awareness can be obtained from
the adoption of using the Elkonin Boxes technique. Based on the understanding of
Higgins (2012), the Elkonin Boxes is a simple and swift way to teach phonemic
awareness. Chan, Hu, & Wan (2005) define phonemic awareness as awareness of
different phonological unites of the oral language, ranging from syllables, to
intermediate syllabic units (for example onsets and rimes), and finally to phonemes.
The Elkonin Boxes is based on the multi-sensory technique that categorizes
each sound in the word; also noting that effective phonemic awareness instruction
teaches students to notice, ponder about and manipulate sounds in spoken language
(Beller, 2006). Clay (as cited in Beller, 2006) explains that students who use Elkonin
boxes are able to hear sounds in words, segment words and show an understanding of
letter-sound correspondence. Adams-Gordon (2010) explains that it does not matter
who is doing the reciting, whether a teacher, recording or himself. This technique is
chosen as the base concept because recent researches have showed that the more
senses incorporated into the learning process, the more efficient learning becomes for
all types of learners (Adams-Gordon, 2010).
According to Westwood (cited in New South Wales Department of Education
and Training 2007), there are two variations of the Look, Say, Cover, Write, Check
10
method of which both serve with the similar aim, a strategy to support visual
knowledge (refer to Table 2):
Table 2
Two Variations of Look, Say, Cover, Write, Check
Variation 1 Variation 2
Look at the word
Say
Break the word into syllables
Write the word without copying
Check what you have written
Revise
Select the word you wish to spell
Pronounce the word clearly
Say each syllable of the word
Name the letters in the word
Write the word, naming each letter as you
write.
Note. Adapted from “Writing and spelling strategies: Assisting students who have additional
learning support needs (2nd
ed.)” by Westwood (cited in New South Wales Department of
Education and Training), Retrieved from
http://www.schools.nsw.edu.au/media/downloads/schoolsweb/studentsupport/programs/lrngdi
ficulties/writespellsec6.pdf
In carrying out this action research, the application of adapted techniques was
done. The Spelling Game intervention was an innovated adaptation product of two
different spelling techniques. However, these two techniques relie on the concept of
multi-sensory technique.
Conventionally, the Elkonin Boxes require students to insert sounds into the
boxes. In the adaptation, the onset and rime (serve as general understanding of
sounds), are given readily in boxes for students to sort out while listening to the
teacher’s pronunciation. Whitworth (n.d.) discloses that the Look, Cover, Write,
Check way of learning spelling is often being used by teachers to have students to
carry out in a regular weekly basis so that students can test themselves a few times. In
the adaptation done, the aspect of ‘look’ is switched with ‘listen’ to the teacher’s
11
pronunciation. The same concept of game was played for four times in the same
manner.
2.0 FOCUS OF INVESTIGATION/ISSUE OF CONCERN
To understand the purpose of carrying out this action research, it is important to
analyse the problem that is being detected in the informal observation. To prove the
existence of the problem identified, preliminary investigation was carried out. The
analysis of the data obtained during the preliminary investigation stage provided
concrete reason for the need to carry out this action research.
2.1 Problem Statement
The study of spelling appears minor and less emphasized in the curriculum. However,
it carries great impact on the development of the basic language skills such as reading
and writing. The research base for claiming that spelling is vital for young children is
solid: Learning to spell improves children’s reading and writing (Moats, 2005).
Therefore, spelling ability is said to be the fundamental preparation for students to be
able to achieve better performance in the language skills mentioned. Based on the
findings of Stirling (2003), people are frequently judged by their spelling, making one
to feel embarrassed due to failure in spelling simple words, especially when trying to
express complex ideas.
2.2 Preliminary Investigation
Based on the early teaching experience, students showed obvious lacking in
knowledge on how to spell appropriately. Many spelling errors were highlighted in
their homework. To further confirm the existence of this problem, the pre-spelling test
was conducted, followed up by a questionnaire.
12
2.2.1 Pre-spelling Test
The purpose of this test is to double confirm the early informal observation. Also, it is
to serve as a pre-test to be compared with the post-test after the intervention. It acts as
a measure whether students have gained benefits from the intervention.
The choice of words was selected randomly from the English language Form 3
text book. This is to ensure that the words tested were within the curriculum and are
not too difficult in meanings for the students.
There are a total of 10 mono syllabic words being tested in the pre-spelling test:
1. shop 2. drop
3. less 4. park
5. feet 6. crack
7. stretch 8. sail
9. break 10. comb
2.2.2 Questionnaire
After carrying out the pre-spelling test, it is found that a questionnaire to seek
responses from students is necessary to explain the informal observation of students’
being weak in their spelling. Therefore, a simple questionnaire was designed for the
participants of this action research to analyze the result of the pre-spelling test.
There are two subjective questions listed in the questionnaire (refer to
Appendix A). The questions included were as below:
13
1. Do you think you can spell new words correctly?
2. How do you spell new words? Describe the strategy that you used.
Participants were asked to confess about how they dealt with the spelling of new
words before the intervention so that comparison could be done later. The questions
were designed to target the way how students spell unfamiliar words. It was important
to figure out what kind of strategy they used and whether they were able to spell new
words before undergoing the intervention. Similarity in strategies used would enhance
the effectiveness of the intervention and vice-versa.
2.3 Analysis of Preliminary Investigation
In analysing the preliminary investigation data, few methods of analysis were being
applied. It is important to study the relationship of how these data show coherent
rationale for the need to carry out the action research to improve participants’ spelling
ability.
2.3.1 Interpreting Pre-spelling Test Result
The result obtained from the pre-spelling test was surprising, with some students
achieving high percentage and some extremely low. In this report, pseudonyms are
used to avoid enclosing students’ real particulars. The result was tabulated (refer to
Table 3).
14
Table 3
Participants’ Pre-spelling Test Result
The result (%) was calculated based on how many words spelt correctly by
students. Below was the formula used:
Result (%) =
x 100%
Based on the result shown in Table 3, most of the participants did not obtain
distinction result. 6 out of 10 of them got only 40%. This means that a majority of
them failed to spell half of the spelling words correctly. A participant, Mahiyah scored
extremely low percentage with only 10%. On the other hand, Latifah managed to
score excellently 90% with only one word spelt wrongly.
It is undeniable that from the test result shown, the participants were of mixed
proficiency levels. As seen, there were participants who scored very well and some
who did not. However, from the general view of the result, it could be deduced that
most of them actually did not do very well in spelling even though the words tested
Participant Result (%)
Ahmad 40
Siti 70
Fatimah 40
Badrul 40
Kasimas 60
Cerdik 40
Daud 40
Mahiyah 10
Latifah 90
Ekhwan 40
15
were not extremely difficult. Some words might be familiar to students yet the result
obtained was not satisfying overall.
By referring to Table A1, it seemed that certain words appeared to be difficult
to spell for participants. These words were, “feet”, “crack”, “stretch”, “sail”, “break”
and “comb”. Various spelling attempts were done by participants in the spelling test
and were recorded to understand the type of errors made.
According to Sangay Jamtsho (2014), there are two types of errors, being
classified as the visual errors [for example “liense” (license)] and auditory errors [for
example “lisence” (license)]. Based on Sangay Jamtsho’s explanation, visual errors
are caused by excessive dependence on the visual route whereby the speller has
weakness in auditory and fails to match sounds with letters. On the contrary, auditory
errors are due to the over-reliance on auditory route and a poor visual memory
whereby the speller has not read it enough to form a visual picture or has heard the
word but not seen it before.
Based on the categorization of errors elaborated by Sangay Jamtsho, Table 4
shows some of the identified students’ errors sorted in categories:
16
Table 4
Categorization of Participants’ Errors
Visual Error Actual Word Auditory Error
short, shall shop --
droped, drowked drop --
last, lose less lase, lais
feel, felt feet feed, fit
crake crack kread, creak, craks, creak, crak
strenght, strange, stread,
strength, streight, steshst
stretch stresh, strenge
seld, sells, cill sail seil, seell, sell
breath, bread break breade @ brake, brek
home comb chom, kome, come
From the categorization of errors, it seemed the types of error participants
made were quite balanced between visual errors (21 incorrectly spelt words) and
auditory errors (20 incorrectly spelt words). However, they seemed to make more
errors due to poor auditory skill. However, there were errors made due to poor visual
skill for every tested word. To conclude, they were commonly weak in both auditory
and visual skills when spelling words.
2.3.2 Interpreting Questionnaire
The questionnaire contained two simple questions which required participants to
provide their confessions about themselves honestly. Therefore, the responses given
by them were purely subjective and personal.
17
To interpret the feedback written by participants, the applied thematic analysis
was used. A few themes were categorized based on the questions set in the
questionnaire. They were, “Ability to Spell New Words Correctly” and “Strategies
Used in Spelling New Words”.
There were overlapping of answers but this should be viewed as a good
interpretation of understandings and attitudes of students in general. This means that
the responses were not made up of isolated concepts but all were relative to each other.
Theme 1: Ability to Spell New Words Correctly
The importance of identifying participants’ acknowledgement of their own ability is
important to enhance the assumption made based on their pre-spelling test result. In
normal circumstance, participants’ confession should be coherent with the result they
obtained to be rational and valid.
Table 5
Thematic Analysis: Ability to Spell New Words Correctly
Participant Response
Ahmad
Siti
Latifah
: Yes.
: I think so.
Badrul
Kasimas
: Sometimes.
Fatimah
Cerdik
Daud
Mahiyah
Ekhwan
: No.
: No, I don’t think so.
Based on the categorization of feedback from participants, it seemed that more
participants felt that they were not good in spelling and answered “no”. There was a
18
handful of participants who were positively confident and answered “yes”. However,
there were two participants who gave uncertain answers of neither “yes” nor “no”.
These two participants were likely to be unsure of their own ability. It could be due to
past experiences whereby sometimes they managed to guess the right spelling out of
coincidence. Therefore, they were not able to determine for sure whether they were
really good or not in spelling new words. Another possibility could be due to low self
esteem resulted from their low proficiency in the language. They might be too
intimidated to disclose the truth and therefore chosen an ambiguous answer.
Theme 2: Strategies Used in Spelling New Words
In spelling words, the participants might use certain strategies of which they
themselves were not aware of. It was expected that participants would just describe
instead of stating the exact strategy used. Therefore, the analysis was done based on
the description given by the participants.
From the analysis of the errors made in the spellings, it was found that the
strategies used by the participants could be classified into visual, auditory, usage of
both or none (refer to Table 6).
Table 6
Thematic Analysis: Strategies Used in Spelling New Words
Participant Response Strategy
Ahmad
Siti
Badrul
Cerdik
Daud
Ekhwan
: I will try imagin the sound hear, then I spell what I hear.
: By listening to the sound, I hear and spell the word.
: I try hard listen but I alway spel wrong. I don know what
strategy use.
: I trai listen but I always spel wrong. I tink I see what I
hear.
: Listen to sound of word and spell.
: From listen sound, I write word spelling.
Auditory
Fatimah
: I memorize word pattern to spell.
Visual
19
Latifah
Kasimas
: I listen, I spell. Remember word patten.
: I remember word pattern. Then I spell what I hear.
Auditory
and
Visual
Mahiyah
: I no strategy.
--
Based on Table 6, it appeared that most of the participants were familiar with
the usage of auditory skill in spelling new words. It is important to have at least the
basic knowledge and recognition of onset and rime to be able to use auditory to spell.
However, with the result shown in their pre-spelling test, it had appeared that
participants were exposed to and familiar with onset and rime separately. They failed
to use the correct onset and rime together to get the correct spelling. For example,
Daud spelt “crack” (creak). He wanted to spell the word by using the auditory strategy
but he ended up getting a wrong spelling due to the wrong combination of onset “cr”
and rime “eak”. Hence, the researcher had discovered that he spelt the word wrongly
due to dependence on merely the auditory.
From the 10 participants, surprisingly there was only one participant admitted
using visual strategy in spelling new word. Fatimah, being one of the poor spellers
who scored only 40% thought that spelling using visual only was her best alternative
to spell new words. In spite of her attempt in memorizing word pattern, she still failed
to obtain a high score in the pre-spelling test.
Kasimas used both strategies and could be detected from her pre-spelling test
answers. She spelt “feel” (feet). This was a visual error. She also spelt wrongly for the
word “comb” (come). This is an auditory error. With the use of both visual and
auditory strategies, she scored averagely in the pre-spelling test. The top scorer in the
20
test, Latifah was also one of the candidates who applied the knowledge of visual and
auditory in spelling.
As for Mahiyah who was the only one from the 10 participants and also the
weakest in spelling, confessed that she did not apply any strategy at all in spelling new
words. Her answer was doubtful because she did not seem to put in any effort in
explaining or describing the process of spelling new unfamiliar words. She chose the
easy way by stating unknown. It was impossible for one not to have any strategy used
in spelling words. Another possibility that could be deduced based on her pre-spelling
test result was the fact that she probably had no exposure on how to spell words
correctly. All these while, she could be just guessing around based on the limited
knowledge that she had in the English language. This could be a reasonable
explanation in correspond to her result.
2.4 Criteria of Selection
The teaching of spelling is not highlighted in particular in the curriculum specification.
However, it is the basic yet important knowledge that must be taught to students.
To carry out spelling lessons individually as a solo lesson was not advisable
since the curriculum specification focuses more on language for interpersonal and
informational usage. With the given five periods a week for English language lesson
to teach the four language skills: reading, writing, listening and speaking as well as
literature component, the spelling lesson is unable to fit into the timetable.
However, with the permission obtained from the school authorities, additional
lessons outside from the timetable were allowed. Therefore, it is possible to carry out
spelling lessons specifically to tackle students with poor spelling condition. With solo
lessons carried out focusing on one aspect, it is believed to be more effective.
21
2.5 Definition of Terms
There are specific terms which are significant in this action research:
2.5.1 Enhancing
It means intensifying, increasing or further improving the quality, value, or extent of
something (Oxford Dictionary, 2014).
2.5.2 Spelling Ability
It refers to the personal skill that involves an activity of forming words from letters, or
conversely the process of naming the letters that form a word (Ginger Software, 2011).
2.5.3 Spelling Game
They are collection of typing games, quizzes and word games that help children
develop their spelling skills (Knowledge Adventure, n.d.).
3.0 OBJECTIVE/RESEARCH QUESTIONS
An inviting classroom environment that would gradually improve students’ spelling
and motivation to learn English could be created by incorporating spelling game into
the teaching and learning of vocabulary spelling. The following questions were
designed to help to assess if the goals were achieved by the end of the first cycle
action research:
1. Can spelling game assist participants to enhance their ability to spell mono
syllabic words correctly?
2. Can spelling game aid participants to memorize the spelling of the words
learned?
22
4.0 TARGET GROUP/PARTICIPANTS
There were a total of 36 students in the class who sat for the pre-spelling test together.
However, only 10 students were recruited to undergo the intervention in this action
research as participants. They were selected based on self-willingness. Hence, they
were highly self motivated rather than being forced. Due to the fact that the
intervention was done outside from the timetable, participants were told that the
intervention was a form of extra class tuition meant to improve students with poor
spelling skill.
As mentioned, there were 10 participants involved in this action research.
Their proficiency level is between low to intermediate. The majority of them are low
proficiency English as Second Language learners (L2 learners). They are 15 years old
studying in the middle ranking class. They have undergone streaming this year. A
majority of them are from 2F class last year. Despite the fact that they have been
selected to a better class, their proficiency level in English is still low.
There were coincidentally 5 male and 5 female students among the participants.
All of them are Malays. The female students are not too shy to speak and interact with
the male students as they are from the co-ed school. They are able to collaborate with
one another to perform the assigned task. In terms of attitude, most of the students are
optimistic and hold positive attitude in learning.
They are normal learners with no severe linguistic disability. All of them are
L2 learners who hardly use English language outside from the classroom. They even
find difficulty to communicate and understand in English. Hence, at times, it was
necessary to do code switching in teaching instructions to enable them to understand
and follow the procedure.
23
From the 10 participants, there were half of them who suffered from short
sightedness in their vision. However, they all wore spectacles and therefore this eye
sight problem could be overcome. They were able to see clearly with no difficulty.
Other than that, they did not have any serious health problems which could affect their
studies.
Based on the analysis of the participants’ pre-spelling test, they were detected
to be in the stage of transitional. According to Gentry (as cited in Lutz, 1986),
transitional stage is when the speller begins to assimilate the conventional alternative
for representing sounds, moving from a dependence on phonology (sound) for
representing words to a reliance on visual representation and an understanding of the
structure of words. Some examples provided by Gentry are
“egul” (eagle) and “higheked” (hiked). They were able to spell some words based on
the combination knowledge of letter-to-sound and orthography but in the accurate way.
However, most of their spellings were incorrect initially.
5.0 ACTION
In this report, there were a few stages of how the action research was conducted. An
overall process would be discussed in 5.1 Procedure of Action.
5.1 Procedure of Action
There were a few stages in conducting the action research. To have the work done
systematically, a schedule was designed and followed with no changes done (refer to
Table 7).
24
Table 7
Procedure of Action
Week To-do
1 – 4 Teacher carried out informal observation.
5
Students sat for pre-spelling test.
10 participants were selected.
Participants completed questionnaire.
6 Teacher conducted intervention 1.
Participants submitted journal 1.
7 Teacher conducted intervention 2.
Participants submitted journal 2.
8 Teacher conducted intervention 3.
Participants submitted journal 3.
9 Teacher conducted intervention 4.
Participants submitted journal 4.
10 Participants sat for post-spelling test.
11 Teacher organized the data obtained.
12 onwards Teacher prepared the report writing for the action research.
5.1.1 Pre-intervention
All students were required to sit for the pre-spelling test but only 10 students were
selected to be participants in this action research. They were required to answer a
questionnaire before undergoing the first intervention. The answers of the pre-spelling
test were neither discussed nor revealed. The test papers were collected and not
returned to students.
The spelling game was a collaborative learning centered intervention whereby
both partners in the pair must work collaboratively to win. It is a type of learning style
25
which respects and highlights individual group members’ abilities and contributions in
obtaining the common goal of success (London Metropolitan University, 2011). There
were five pairs competing among one another.
During each intervention session, the spelling game consisted of two rounds.
Each intervention lasted for 60 minutes. It was being conducted once a week
consecutively for four weeks duration.
To conduct this game, the following materials were prepared in advanced by the
researcher:
Onset and rime work sheets [Refer to Appendix B(i), (ii), (iii) and (iv)]
List of words
Marker pens
White board
5.1.2 Intervention
Participants were divided into pairs consisting of one male and one female by the
researcher. The reason for not giving participants to choose their partners was to avoid
them from choosing friends whom they were close with only. One of the intentions of
the intervention was meant to get participants to work with one another, regardless of
gender. Therefore to be fair, the researcher selected the pairs randomly among the 10
participants. Then, each pair had to create a name consisting of both participants’
names. The purpose of doing so was to enhance the spirit of collaboration between the
partners. For example, Ahmad paired with Siti. They would combine both their names
and call themselves as Ahti (refer to Table 8).
26
Table 8
Participants Pair List
Pair Name Participants
Ahti Ahmad Siti
Bamah Fatimah Badrul
Cermas Kasimas Cerdik
Dayah Daud Mahiyah
Efah Latifah Ekhwan
Participants were not allowed to exchange partners throughout the four
interventions. This was because it required time to manifest collaboration spirit
between the pair.
During each intervention, participants were required to be with their pair
partners. However, the positioning was illustrated as shown in the Figure 1.
27
Keys:
Player 1
Player 2
Desk
Figure 1
Positioning of Player 1 and Player 2 during Spelling Game
Approximate
Distance: 1 meter
White board
Approximate Distance: 0.5 meter
28
With the help of the illustration shown in Figure 1 above, the rules of the game were
as shown below:
The distance between Player 1 and Player 2 of each pair was approximately 1
meter.
The distance between Players 1 from each pair was approximately 0.5 meter.
All Player 1 were provided a piece of onset and rime worksheet whereas all
Player 2 were given a marker pen.
All Player 1 were not allowed to turn their backs to look at their partners
(Player 2) during the game.
All Player 1 could only shout out the word to their partners for a maximum of
five times only.
All Player 1 must not disturb one another during the game.
All Player 2 must not copy from one another during the game.
This game was an adaptation from the look, say, cover, write, check technique and
Elkonin Boxes technique reference. These two techniques did not involve game
originally but was adapted to fit the need of this research. To avoid confusion from
understanding how the game worked, a flow chart was created to clearly illustrate the
process of the game.
29
Figure 2
Process of Spelling Game
Step 1: Teacher said out a different word to
Player 1 of each pair one by one.
Step 2: Player 1 listened and formed word from
the onset and rime work sheet.
Step 3: Teacher announced the moment when all Player1 could
shout out simultaneously to their partners.
Step 4: Player 1 shouted out the word to Player 2
for a maximum of 5 times.
Step 5: Player 2 written down the word heard
from their partner, without turning their
backs.
Step 6: Player 2 of each pair examined their
partner's answer.
Step 7: Teacher counter checked after the early examination done by
Player 2.
Step 8: Teacher awarded points to each pair which
spellt correctly.
30
Table 9
List of Words Learned for the Four Interventions
Intervention 1 Intervention 2 Intervention 3 Intervention 4
1. bay
2. cap
3. desk
4. egg
5. foot
6. gift
7. hut
8. ice
9. jeep
10. kept
1. snail
2. mail
3. church
4. bowl
5. dawn
6. pose
7. wise
8. faint
9. child
10. bed
1. chance
2. verb
3. dig
4. rinse
5. tap
6. snore
7. pet
8. maid
9. field
10. bug
1. stain
2. rough
3. snap
4. grow
5. taint
6. boot
7. bag
8. tame
9. mold
10. flew
Table 10
Onset and Rime Covered in the Four Interventions
Intervention 1 Intervention 2 Intervention 3 Intervention 4
Onset Rime Onset Rime Onset Rime Onset Rime
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
ay
ap
esk
gg
oot
ift
ut
ce
eep
ept
sn
m
ch
b
d
p
w
f
ail
urch
owl
awn
ose
ise
aint
ild
ed
ch
v
d
r
t
sn
p
m
f
b
ance
erb
ig
inse
ap
ore
et
aid
ield
ug
st
r
sn
gr
t
b
m
fl
ain
ough
ap
ow
aint
oot
ag
ame
old
ew
A variety of onset and rime were chosen randomly. The purpose of the
intervention was to educate participants how to recognize the sound decoded in the
orthography form. With the variety, it was expected that participants would have
larger exposure on different types of onset and rime. This way, they would be able to
spell new words better.
31
After the first round of the game, the second round continued exactly
according to the eight steps as shown in the flow chart above except that the role of
Player 1 and Player 2 were interchanged. The purpose of having alternate roles for one
intervention was to allow both participants in the pair to experience the different roles.
When the second round of the game ended as well, all participants were required to
write a personal spelling journal to be submitted before they leave the classroom. All
journals were collected immediately after each intervention.
Throughout the interventions, the teacher recorded field notes of what
observed. This was being done on the spot while participants were undergoing the
interventions.
5.1.3 Post-intervention
As a form of motivation for participants, beverage was prepared after the intervention.
It was to encourage participants to come regularly though the time set for the
intervention was not within the timetable school hours. It was indeed a successful
positive motivation that was able to maintain participants’ attendance.
After completing all the four interventions, the researcher carried out the
post-spelling test. Similar to the pre-spelling test, all answers were not discussed and
revealed to participants. The test papers were collected back by the researcher.
Tabulation and analysis of data were done after all the interventions were completed.
5.2 Data Gathering Methods
In the process of carrying out the action research, various qualitative and quantitative
data were collected. Some were collected before the intervention and some after.
Among the data obtained were:
32
5.2.1 Participants’ Personal Spelling Journals
After each intervention, participants were required to write a journal entry. The items
to be included in the journal writing include:
o recalling as many as possible words learnt
o reflection about the game
The journals acted as a check-list of how many words participants could remember
after each intervention lesson. As for the reflection, participants were reminded to
write as honest as possible.
By allowing participants to write in their first language (Bahasa Malaysia), their
feedback were anticipated to be more truthful and thorough. It was undeniable that
due to their language proficiency, they had limited diction. Therefore, limiting the
language use would cause participants unable to expose their true feelings. That would
then defeat the aim of this data.
Also, there was no fixed format for the writing as it was simply a short writing that
required participants to and feedback after the game. This was not supposed to appear
as a burden for participants. They were allowed to write freely as long as the content
covered the topics concerned. To ensure that participants did not take advantage on
skipping the writing work, teacher instructed students to write at least 50 words for the
reflection. Writing exceeding the minimum limit was permissible.
5.2.2 Field Notes
There were a few characteristics to be fulfilled when writing the field notes. It was
important to use accurate, organized and explicit descriptions while observing.
33
During each intervention, the researcher would record descriptive and reflective
information. The field notes included answers to the following questions:
o How successful the pairs of participants interacted with one another?
o Did participants follow the rules and behave appropriately?
o Is there any participant who mispronounced the word? If there is, transcribe
their pronunciations.
Other than the questions mentioned above, additional observation was recorded as
well, if they were found important to the action research. Unexpected incident that
took place during the intervention was also recorded in the field note.
5.2.3 Post-spelling Test
The words tested were similar to the ones tested in pre-spelling test. The purpose was
to compare the same test result to determine if the intervention was useful to improve
participants’ performance in spelling. The post-spelling test acted as a measure.
6.0 DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
To analyse the data obtained in this action research, two types of analysis methods
were being employed. Firstly, the applied thematic analysis was used in analyzing the
participants’ personal spelling journals and teacher’s field notes. Secondly, the
statistical analysis was used to study the relationship between pre and post-spelling
tests results.
6.1 Interpreting Participants’ Personal Spelling Journals
Participants were required to write at least a 50-word journal for every intervention.
However, it was inevitable to have some participants who failed to abide the
34
instruction given. They tend to write shorter than the required word count. However, it
was better than not writing at all. Also, there were some mischievous participants who
did not write the required content. Most of the journal entries included unnecessary
information such as compliments for the teacher.
Due to the earlier permission given to participants which allowed them to write
in Bahasa Malaysia as an alternative language for their journals, translation to English
was done to be included as analysis in this report. Therefore, italic text with asterisk
symbol (*) means translated text from Bahasa Malaysia. The journal entries written by
students were carefully compiled and categorized according to the sequence of
intervention (refer to Table A2)
To analyze the journals written by participants, a few themes were sorted for
analysis. They were, “Perception towards Spelling Game” and “Learning Words via
Spelling Game”.
Theme 1: Perception towards Spelling Game
Participants were interested and positively motivated to participate in the spelling
game. This could be seen from their responses from the first intervention till the forth
intervention. During the last intervention, participants were reluctant to end the
spelling game and wanted to have the game continued. They showed great interest in
the spelling game.
35
Table 11
Thematic Analysis: Positive Perception towards Spelling Game in Intervention 1
Intervention 1
Siti : * I felt very happy because I got to play the game.
Kasimas : * Today I am very happy because I got to play game.
Daud : I’m very happy and play this game good because the teacher Lydia very
pretty and be careful, happy.
Mahiyah : I’m happy and excited because play game spelling.
Ekhwan : I feel very happy today because I can learn many words in the games.
Fatimah : I’m happy to the class because she is good for me and for my friend.
Cerdik : EXCITED AND Good… PLAY GAME.
Among the 10 participants, seven claimed that they felt excited and happy for
being able to participate in the spelling game. The rest of the participants revealed that
they were happy as well but did not mention specifically it was due to the
participation in spelling game.
Table 12
Thematic Analysis: Positive Perception towards Spelling Game in Intervention 2
Intervention 2
Siti : * I felt that it was not a waste of time to join this extra class. It was not
boring…
Kasimas : * The class was not boring at all… I don’t find it a waste to come to this
extra class.
Cerdik : I very happy because can playing game…
Mahiyah : * I felt very happy today because I got to play the spelling game.
Latifah : * I felt the game just now was very easy but fun. I found it very
challenging.
In the second intervention, there was a decrease in number of participants who
admitted they liked the spelling game. However, those who liked reasoned that the
game was not boring at all and it was not a waste of time to participate.
36
Table 13
Thematic Analysis: Positive Perception towards Spelling Game in Intervention 3
Intervention 3
Ahmad : Very use game. I love it.
Mahiyah : * I like this game… Although I have played this game thrice, it is not
boring at all.
Latifah : * I love the game…
Ekhwan : * I find this class best…
In the third intervention, there was a slight decrease in number of participants
who liked the spelling game. There were lesser responses from participants who wrote
about the game. Most of them focused more on saying they were happy for learning
new words.
Table 14
Thematic Analysis: Positive Perception towards Spelling Game in Intervention 4
Intervention 4
Fatimah : * I hope there will still be this extra class…
Daud : * I extremely love to play this game.
Mahiyah : * I’m happy and I find the extra class enjoyable… Next week, I hope to
be able to play this game again.
Latifah : * This game is very useful.
Ekhwan : I think this spelling game is good
However, in the last intervention, there was increase in the responses of
participants for liking the spelling game. There were two participants, Fatimah and
Mahiyah who even hoped that the spelling game could be continued. The comments
gathered for this spelling game were generally consistently positive.
Responses which directly commented on the spelling game only were taken
into the calculation. As mentioned earlier, there were quite a number of responses
37
which stated that they were happy because they were able to learn many words. The
fact that learning new words could be from the impact of spelling game but could also
be due to other unknown reason. It was not defined clearly. There were also responses
that stated it was the teacher’s contribution that made them learnt these new words.
On the contrary, there were also negative feedbacks from participants on
certain interventions. Their responses were recorded in Table 16:
Table 15
Thematic Analysis: Negative Perception towards Spelling Game
Intervention 1
Fatimah : I’m very angry because I tell Badrul in language English, he not
understand me… I’m very angry…… Errr……
Intervention 2
Fatimah : * … I’m very frustrated!!! I hope, I can change group, teacher!
Please…….
Intervension 4
Siti : * Today, the extra class is less fun because my partner, Ahmad is
absent. So, I have to exchange partners.
Fatimah and Siti were the only two participants who reported negative feelings
towards the learning process in their journals. As for Fatimah’s case, she was unhappy
with the partner she was paired with, Badrul. She constantly complained that she
could not collaborate well with him. She expressed frustration in her writing of journal
by begging for an exchange of partner because Badrul did not seem to understand
everything that she said. As for Siti’s case, she claimed to enjoy the game throughout
all the interventions except for the last one because her partner, Ahmad was absent. To
sum up, these two participants showed dislike in their journals simply because of the
factor of partner. It was not particularly due to the nature of the spelling game itself.
38
Next, to study the exact reasons for participants’ claim that they liked the
spelling game, their responses were recorded in Table 16.
Table 16
Thematic Analysis: Reasons of Participants who Like the Spelling Game
Intervention 1, 2, 3 and 4
Siti : * I felt more motivated to learn. I can correct the words I spelt wrongly
before this.
: * I got to know many words. I could also correct words which I spelt
wrongly previously… It was not boring and in fact made me happier and
more active.
Fatimah : * because it is good for me and for my friend.
Badrul : * … helped me a lot in understanding what I did not understand
previously… I learnt the meaning of collaborative with my friend in
playing a game…
Kasimas : * This game helped me to learn the ways to spell words correctly. Also, it
has many benefits.
: *… it gives me a lot of benefits.
Daud : … because the teacher Lydia very pretty and be careful, happy.
Mahiyah : * … because I am able to spell many words correctly. Although I have
played this game thrice, it is not boring at all. Also, I learnt many new
words at the same time.
: * … enjoyable.
Latifah : * I got to study with easier method.
: * I felt the game just now was very easy but fun. I found it very
challenging.
: * I love the game which required writing word on the white board
because it tested my mind with new words… I got to learn many new
words…
: * I learnt many new words. The correct spelling… Last time, I am not
sure how to spell new words. Now, I know what method to use.
Ekhwan : … I can learn many words in the games.
: … I learn new words
: I learn a lot.
Most of the reasons given by participants revolved around the fact that spelling
game aided them to learn more new words. Some mentioned there were benefits
gained but they did not specifically state what the benefits were. Almost all of the
participants agreed that the spelling game was beneficial in learning new words.
39
Theme 2: Learning Words via Spelling Game
To determine whether participants were able to memorize the words learnt, the
personal spelling journal acted as an informal test. Participants were not allowed to
refer to any source including their friend when writing. Therefore, the answers should
be purely genuine and significant to the study of whether participants could memorize
words spelling via spelling game indirectly.
Table 17
Thematic Analysis: Learning Words via Spelling Game
Intervention 1, 2, 3 and 4
Ahmad : Good, Best, Happy, Gift, Desk, Foot, Boy, Egg, Cap
: Rinse, Snore, Maid, Field, Bug
Siti : verb, Field, maid
Fatimah : Chance, Field, Verb, Pet, Snore, Dig
Kasimas : vote, punch, worm, flew, chase
Cerdik : Cap, Desk, Egg, Foot, Gift
: RAG, Dirt, rose, wise, Faint, Dorm
: Chance, verb, Dig, Rinse, Tap, Snore, Field
: Vote, Deaf, Rough, Tame, snap, punch and Mold
Daud : Stain, Rough, Snap, Grow, Taint, Boot, Bag
Latifah : church, snail, bowl, dawn, wise, faint
: chance, dig, snore, pet, maid, bug
: Boot, Taint, Grow, Bag, Tame, Mold
Ekhwan : chunk, church, pawn, loss, rose
: Tap, Snore, pet, Bug, Field
: Tame, Flew, Taint, Rough
All except two participants, Badrul and Mahiyah, did not record the words
they could remember. Among the possibilities could be their ignorance in following
the instruction given or they could not remember for real. These two possibilities were
in equal weightage due to the fact that the possibility of them forgetting was near to
nil. It was impossible for participants to forget when the researcher constantly
40
repeated the instruction for each time journal writing session. It could be possible that
they might forget once or twice but not for all the four interventions.
Throughout the four interventions, 40 words were introduced to participants as
a whole group. However, each participant learned specifically two words minimum
for per intervention. So, in four interventions, each participant should acquire at least
eight words. Of course, if participants could remember more, that would indicate
better result due to the use of spelling game.
From Table 17, four participants managed to spell more than eight words
throughout the four interventions whereas the remaining four participants failed to do
so. However, they still managed to remember at least a handful of words rather than
nothing. Hence, it could be deduced that overall, participants still managed to
memorize the words learnt but may not be the excellent level.
6.2 Field Notes
The researcher’s field notes (refer to Appendix C) were important in analysing
participants’ behaviors while carrying out the spelling game. To study in-depth, a few
themes were identified, which were “Participants’ Mispronunciation”, “Problems
Faced by Participants during Spelling Game” and “The Effectiveness of Collaboration
in Spelling Game”.
Theme 1: Participants’ Mispronunciation
Throughout the interventions, there were times when participants mispronounced
words which caused their partners unable to spell the words correctly (refer to
Table 18).
41
Table 18
Thematic Analysis: Participants’ Mispronunciation
Intervention 1
Researcher : Fatimah pronounced “Gift” that sounded like “Hift”. Badrul spelt
“Hif”.
Intervention 2
Researcher : Fatimah is student 2 (in front of white board). Badrul pronounced /pæd/
for the word “bed”. So, Fatimah at the front wrote “paint”.
Based on Table 18, both Fatimah and Badrul had actually made mistakes. In
Intervention 1, Fatimah pronounced the word wrongly in the first place. Due to that,
Badrul spelt wrongly at the end based on what he heard from his partner. In
Intervention 2, it was the reverse case as in Intervention 1. It was Badrul’s turn to
pronounce word wrongly to his partner. As a result, the word spelt out by Fatimah was
incorrect.
Though participants failed to spell the correct assigned word, from their
answers, it seemed that they were able to detect the sound of the onsets (for example,
h and p). They were also able to recognize the sound of the rime (for example, ift). It
was possible to make deduction that if Player 1 was able to pronounce the word
correctly to Player 2, then Player 2 was likely to be able to spell the word correctly.
This deduction was made based on the fact that participants had showed they could
interlink the phonemic awareness with the knowledge of onset and rime.
Theme 2: Problems Faced by Participants during Spelling Game
Though participants enjoyed the game very much, there were some problems that
occurred during the process.
42
Table 19
Thematic Analysis: Problems Faced by Participants during Spelling Game
Intervention 1
Messy
situation
: Round 1 of the game was a little messy. Students were not familiar with
the operation of the game yet. Students facing the white board
(Students 2) kept turning their heads to their partners.
Due to the fact that this was a new game and participants were excited about it,
they wanted to begin the game as soon as possible. However, they neglected the
importance of abiding to the game rules. Strict warnings were given to avoid students
from disobeying the rules that would cause a chaos to the organisation of the lesson.
This problem was solved not long after the strict warnings were given. The next
problem was participants’ unexpected behaviors.
Table 20
Thematic Analysis: Unexpected Participants’ Behaviors
Intervention 2
Mischievous : Ahmad asked me to repeat a few times. I did but told him that I will
not repeat so many times anymore… He is a bit naughty. After asking
me to repeat, he giggled.
Dishonest : They followed the rules better this time though there still few pairs
who tried to cheat. I caught and reprimanded them.
Impatient : Being scolded by Fatimah, Badrul got angry too and scolded back.
Being mischievous, Ahmad could also be taking advantage over other
participants’ privilege for asking to listen to the word more times than the others. His
action was treated with stern warning. After that, he no longer repeated the same
behavior again. As for the second behavior evidence detected, these participants were
43
not being honest enough in the game. Similarly, strict warning was given to ensure
that this kind of behavior would not prolong. The last misbehave trait noted was
impatience. Badrul and Fatimah got into a fight due to disagreement and
dissatisfaction towards each other during the game. To resolve the conflict, the
researcher scolded both participants and reasoned to them what was right and wrong
to do. In the next intervention, these participants stopped behaving that way and
instead of hating each other, they began to accept each other’s flaws and strived hard
to catch up with the other teams.
The following problem was a sudden change that disrupted the flow of the
intervention. In Intervention 4, Ahmad was absent, leaving his partner, Siti alone
without a partner. Hence, this did leave an impact in Siti’s learning that day.
Table 21
Thematic Analysis: Sudden Disrupt Impact
Intervention 4
Absence
of Partner
: Based on Siti’s facial expression, she is shocked and a little unhappy
with the condition of herself not having any partner.
Siti used to be able to spell most words correctly during the interventions when
she was pairing with Ahmad. However, due to Ahmad’s absence on that day, Siti’s
performance was affected. She failed to spell the words correctly. To explain this, it
could be she was not used to pair with other students.
Theme 3: The Effectiveness of Collaboration in Spelling Game
The spelling game was designed in such a way that it put a lot of emphasis on the
collaboration spirit between two members of the team. Most of the participants
44
showed positive signs except Fatimah and Badrul in the first two interventions.
However, they gained back the spirit of collaboration soon after they were being
corrected on their views towards their partners.
Table 22
Thematic Analysis: The Effectiveness of Collaboration in Spelling Game (a)
Intervention 1
Researcher : Based on what I see, this pair are not collaborating nicely. There
were grudges between Fatimah and Badrul.
Intervention 2
Researcher : Fatimah scolded Badrul in the face, said it was his fault for not
pronouncing correctly.
Intervention 3
Researcher : This time, Badrul and Fatimah tried to put their grudges aside and
strived to win the other teams.
Other than Badrul and Fatimah, other pairs showed good evidence of the
effectiveness of collaboration in the spelling game. For example, the Cermas pair
showed a good evidence of it (refer to Table 23).
Table 23
Thematic Analysis: The Effectiveness of Collaboration in Spelling Game (b)
Intervention 3
Resesarcher : Kasimas expressed gratitude to Cerdik for being patient with her. She
felt that she was not good in English and whoever pairing with her
will not get benefited. Cerdik encouraged her and said they would do
better in the next round.
45
Cerdik and Kasimas worked together collaboratively though both of them felt
that they were weak in English. Cerdik played the role of a good friend who advised
and motivated his friend to increase her self-confidence.
As discussed earlier for Siti’s condition in Intervention 4 (whereby she had to
play the game without her original partner, Ahmad), it was found out that the aspect of
who-your-parter-is did affect students’ performance. A bond of collaboration was
likely to be developed between the Ahti pair. This explained why Siti was not doing
that well as she used to be in the previous interventions.
6.3 Interpreting Post-spelling Test Result
This post-spelling test was carried out to be compared with the pre-spelling test result.
The result of participants’ post-spelling test with comparison to their pre-spelling test
would determine whether students improved in their spelling ability after undergoing
four times of intervention (refer to Table 24).
Table 24
Comparison between Pre and Post-spelling Test Results and Gain
Student Pre-spelling Test (%) Post-spelling Test (%) Gain (%)
Ahmad 40 50 +10
Siti 70 80 +10
Fatimah 40 80 +40
Badrul 40 60 +20
Kasimas 60 80 +20
Cerdik 40 70 +30
Daud 40 40 0
Mahiyah 10 30 +20
Latifah 90 90 0
Ekhwan 40 80 +40
The method of calculation for the post-spelling test percentage was similar
with the method used for pre-spelling test.
46
From the result of the post-spelling test, it showed that all the participants
either maintained their percentage or had their percentage increased. Some
participants managed to double their original percentage score which was a great
result. Though two participants did not improve, their percentage score did not
decrease, which was a good sign too. Based on the result shown, the spelling game
intervention was a success in improving the participants’ spelling ability.
Table A3 was designed to compare and contrast students’ answers for similar
words tested in pre and post-spelling test. Some participants repeated the same
mistake they did in the pre-spelling test. They were Ahmad writing “stresh” (stretch),
Fatimah “home” (comb), Mahiyah writing “fit” (feet) and Daud writing “lase” (less).
It could be that they were still unsure of how to spell these words and the existing
schemata guided them to spell the same way as they did in the pre-spelling test.
However, these participants who did this were the minority. Most of the other
participants attempted a new spelling even if they did not know how to spell the word.
An obvious evidence was found in Mahiyah’s answer that showed the
knowledge of onset and rime was applied in the process of spelling. When spelling the
word “drop”, Mahiyah spelt it as “drowked” in the pre-spelling test and “droup” in the
post-spelling test. From the word “drowked”, it had no connection at all to the rime of
the original word, which should have a /p/ sound at the end. In her second attempt,
though she still failed to spell correctly, at least she managed to detect the /p/ sound by
spelling it as “droup”. She was probably confused with the sound of the diphthong
/ʚʊ/ over the vowel /o/.
Another interesting discovery was identified from participants’ post-spelling
test result. Providing two answers was an action of guessing and a form of uncertainty
47
expression. Mahiyah used to write two answers for the word “break” in her
pre-spelling test. In the post-spelling test, she was more confident in writing only one
answer – “braid”. Though the spelling was incorrect for the exact word, “Break”, it
disclosed that she had gained confidence.
In the earlier pre-spelling test, the words “crack”, “stretch”, “sail” and “comb”
used to be difficult words which many students failed to spell correctly. After the
interventions, more participants were able to spell them correctly though not all
managed to do so. Yet, it was a remarkable improvement detected among the ten
participants generally.
7.0 FINDINGS
In this action research, various data were collected such as the pre-spelling test result,
questionnaire, participants’ personal spelling journals, researcher’s field notes and
post-spelling test result. The findings and analysis of these data were significant in
answering the questions set in this research.
To answer the first question of the action research, whether spelling game is
effective in enhancing participants’ spelling ability; it was proven with the data
analysis of the gain in the pre and post-spelling tests results. All except two
participants had improved tremendously. The other two participants did not improve
neither degrade. With the statistical data calculated, it was undeniable that the spelling
game was indeed an effective way of improving participants’ spelling skill.
Other than the spelling test results, the other data such as participants’ personal
spelling journals revealed that they had great interest in the spelling game. Regardless
of any task given, interest was definitely one of the key factors. With interest
48
implanted, participants’ improvement was anticipated. They looked forward to each
time of the intervention for they were able to play the game again.
The researcher’s field notes data analysis pointed out the problems faced
during the intervention. In spite of all the problems faced, it was discovered that
collaboration was also an influential factor of success in this research. If participants
failed to collaborate well with their partner, the game would not be conducted as
planned due to unachievable objective. As collaboration, a main component that
directly affects the success of the spelling game, it is essential to have it as a support
other than what participants claimed to be true in their journals. It aimed to validate
what students’ reported.
The questionnaire played an important role in the pre-investigation stage. Its
purpose was to identify participants’ confidence level in spelling new words and what
strategy they used. After undergoing the interventions, it was anticipated for
participants to have an increase in their motivational and confidence level towards
spelling new words.
In answering the second research question, whether participants were able to
memorize the words learned, the data analysis of participants’ personal spelling
journals answered it. Albeit most of the participants did not achieve the minimum
requirement of word learned count, at least they were able to produce something other
than nothing. This was applicably true for all except two participants who failed to
provide any in their writing. With the data shown, it could be deduced that participants
were partially successful in memorizing the spelling of new words learned.
49
Overall, the data collected did assist to answer the research questions. Based
on the data analysis, it was an obvious indicator that spelling game is a successful way
of teaching spelling to low proficiency students.
8.0 LIMITATIONS
In spite of the success discussed in the findings of this action research, it does have
some limitations which should be avoided or solved, if possible. Then, it could be
more concrete.
Firstly, this spelling game could not cater for too many students at one time. It
would be difficult for the teacher to have class control if there were too many players
in the game. Secondly, teacher’s pronunciation may be inaccurate which cause
students to misspell. Thirdly, this lesson was conducted outside from the timetable
which was actually a kind of constraint to both the teacher and students.
9.0 SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH
This action research was conducted at an amateur stage. Since spelling game had
shown success within this group of participants, it might be interesting to carry it out
with either the average or high proficiency group students. The result may vary.
There were indeed areas to be improved for this action research. To further
enhance students’ understanding of spelling knowledge, they should be exposed to
word sorting strategy as the extended activity. The spelling game could be the early
exposure for students to be familiarize and recognize the different types of onset and
rime. Then, students should learn how to categorize words, doing it the inverse
manner this time. If they are able to do that, it can be confirmed further that students
indeed have mastered the ability to spell. The ability of encoding and decoding from
50
sound to orthography and vice versa are both important in the process of determining
whether one is a good speller.
This action research focused only on 10 students. Perhaps in the next
improvisation made, the spelling game could be adapted in a way that could cater for
more students. Otherwise, it could be an extra burden to carry out an extra lesson not
within the timetable. Modification and alteration may create possibility for this to
happen.
Lastly, the spelling game might be complicated for first-time players. This is
because the game was an innovative product of adaptation from various concepts.
Hence, if it could be simplified further but achieving the same objective, which would
be well recommended. Suggested ways of simplifying the game include reducing the
processes involved during the game or having a facilitator for each pair of players.
10.0 CONCLUSION
In this action research, the spelling game was a success based on the comparison
results of participants’ pre and post-spelling test. There was an obvious improvement
after the interventions were carried out. Although participants did not manage to
memorize the expected number of words, they could still at least memorize some of
them. Overall, the spelling game was an interesting and successful alternative to
enhance L2 learners’ spelling ability.
51
References
Adams-Gordon, B. L. (2010). The why & how of teaching spelling: Part II
Establishing teaching strategies. Retrieved from
http://www.spellingpower.com/articles/establishingteachingstrategiesforteachi
ngspelling.pdf
Ahmad Al-Hassan. (n.d.). English spelling is chaotic: What facts lie beind this popular
judgment?. Retrieved from
https://www.uop.edu.jo/download/Research/members/67_1476_Ahma.pdf
Al Neyadi, O. S. (2007). The effects of using games to reinforce vocabulary learning.
Retrieved from http://marifa.hct.ac.ae/files/2011/07/The-Effects-of-Using-
Games-to-Reinforce-Vocabulary-Learning.pdf
Al-Saudi, J. (2013). Error analysis and spelling mistakes of EFL learners at Tafila
Technical University: A case study. Frontiers of Language and Teaching, 4,
99 - 107. Retrieved from
http://www.academia.edu/4140208/Error_Analysis_and_Spelling_Mistakes_of
_EFL_Learners_at_Tafila_Technical_University_A_Case_Study
Antenucci, R., Alderton, I., Boerema, D., Fryer, R., Leaker, J., McLean, C., Sankey,
M., & Conroy, J. (2011). Spelling: From beginnings to proficiency The State
of South Australia: Programs & Resources Early years, Literary Secretariat,
Department of Education and Children’s Services.
Bafile, C. (2012). Vocabulary and spelling: Do your students say ‘boring’?. Retrieved
from http://www.educationworld.com/a_lesson/lesson/lesson241.shtml
52
Bear, D. R., Invernizzi, M., Templeton, S., & Johnston, F. (2009). What is Word
Study?. Retrieved from
http://www.mypearsontraining.com/pdfs/TG_WTW_Wordstudy.pdf
Beller, L. (2006). Elkonin boxes: A multisensory technique for teaching literary skills.
Retrieved from
http://ttac.odu.edu/newsletter/PDF/OLD/NovDec2005Jan2006/3newsletterLau
ra11-05.pdf
Chan, I. C., Hu, C. F., & Wan, I. P. (2005). Learning to read and spell: The relative
role of phonemic awareness and onset-rime awareness. Taiwan Journal of
Linguistics, 3(1), 65 – 100. Retrieved from http://tjl.nccu.edu.tw/volume3-
1/0620Learning_to_Read_and_Spell.pdf
Dripple, S. (n.d.). Kids Spelling Games. Retrieved from http://www.primary-
education-oasis.com/kids-spelling-games.html
Freudenberg, K. (2009). English first language and English second language high
school learners. (Master’s dissertation, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch,
South Africa). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/2052
Frey, N., & Fisher, D. (2005). Language arts workshop: Purposeful reading and
writing instruction. Retrieved from
http://ptgmedia.pearsoncmg.com/images/0131117327/samplechapter/0131117
327_ch07.pdf
Ginger Software. (2011). Spelling difficulties. Retrieved from Halmond, & Hodonicky.
(2014). Word Study vs. Spelling. Retrieved from
http://www.naperville203.org/Page/4052
53
Halmond, & Hodonicky. (2014). Word Study vs. Spelling. Retrieved from
http://www.naperville203.org/Page/4052
Harbeck, J. (2013). English spelling is terrible. Other languages are worse. Retrieved
from http://theweek.com/article/index/243445/english-spelling-is-terrible-
other-languages-are-worse
Hayes, H., Kessler, B., & Treiman, R. (2005). English spelling: Making sense of a
seemingly chaotic writing system. Retrieved from
http://www.ldanh.org/docs/spellingenglish.pdf
Helen & Weiss, M. (n.d.). Helping children spell. Retrieved from
http://eps.schoolspecialty.com/downloads/articles/HelpingChildrenSpell.pdf
Higgins, J. (2012). How to use Elkonin Boxes. Retrieved from http://www.ready-set-
read.com/2012/07/how-to-use-elkonin-boxes.html
Holl, B. (n.d.). Phonological and phonemic awareness. Retrieved from
http://www.readinga-z.com/research/phonological.html#onset
Hook, P. E., & Jones, S. D. (2009). The importance of automaticity and fluency for
efficient reading comprehension. Retrieved from:
http://www.spellingcity.com/fluency.html
James, C., & Klein, K. (n.d.). Foreign language learners’ spelling and proofreading
strategies. Retrieved from
http://www.gespin.amu.edu.pl/psicl/files/29/03James.pdf
54
Jeani Shinta Rahyu. (2009). Spelling Bee Game in teaching narrative text: An
experimental study at SMAN 5 Cimachi (Degree’s thesis, Indonesia University
of Education, West Java, Indonesia). Retrieved from
http://repository.upi.edu/1339/2/s_c0351_054556_chapter1.pdf
Joshi, R. M., & Treiman, R., Carreker, S., & Moats, L. C. (2008). How words cast
their spell: Spelling is an integral part of learning the language, not a matter of
memorization. American Educator. 6 – 43. Retrieved from
Kemmer, S. (2009). The History of English. Retrieved from
http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~kemmer/Histengl/spelling.html
Kessler, B., & Treiman, R. (2003). Is English spelling chaotic? Misconceptions
concerning its irregularity. Reading Psychology, 24(3-4),267-289. doi:
10.1080/02702710390227228 Retrieved from
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02702710390227228?journalCo
de=urpy20#.VFeG4PmUcl8
Knowledge Adventure. (n.d.). Spelling games. Retrieved from
http://www.knowledgeadventure.com/subject/spelling-games
Leipzig, D. H. (n.d.). Word Study: A new approach to teaching spelling. Retrieved
from http://www.readingrockets.org/article/word-study-new-approach-
teaching-spelling
London Metropolitan University (2011). A definition of collaborative vs cooperative
learning. Retrieved from
http://colccti.colfinder.org/sites/default/files/a_definition_of_collaborative_vs_
cooperative_learning.pdf
55
Maddox, M. (n.d.). English spelling is not total chaos. Retrieved from
http://www.dailywritingtips.com/english-spelling-is-not-total-chaos/
Meriem, B. (2010). Teaching and learning vocabulary through spelling strategy
(Master’s dissertation, Mentouri University, Constantine, The People’s
Democratic Republic of Algeria). Retrieved from
http://bu.umc.edu.dz/theses/anglais/BOU1177.pdf
Ministry of Education. (2012). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. Preliminary
report – Executive summary. Putrajaya: Malaysia: Malaysia Government.
Moats, L. (2005). How spelling supports reading. Retrieved from
http://www.readingrockets.org/article/how-spelling-supports-reading
New South Wales Department of Education and Training. (2007). Writing and
spelling strategies: Assisting students who have additional learning support
needs (2nd
ed.).Retrieved from
http://www.schools.nsw.edu.au/media/downloads/schoolsweb/studentsupport/
programs/lrngdificulties/writespellsec6.pdf
Okrent, A. (2013). Why is English spelling so messed up?. Retrieved from
http://mentalfloss.com/article/49960/why-english-spelling-so-messed
Online Writing Lab. (2014). APA tables and figures 1. Retrieved from
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/19
Oxford Dictionary. (2014). Definition enhance. Retrieved from
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/enhance
56
Ravid, D. D. (2011). Spelling morphology: The Psycholinguistics of Hebrew Spelling.
Retrieved from
http://books.google.com.my/books?id=nSbu8d_yiMAC&dq=english+spelling
+is+chaotic+and+unprincipled&source=gbs_navlinks_s
Saigh, K. & Schmitt, N. (2012). Difficulties with vocabulary word form: The case of
Arabic ESL learners. ELSEVIER, 24 – 36. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2012.01.005
Sangay Jamtsho. (2014). Spelling difficulties: What can be done to correct them?.
Retrieved from http://independent.academia.edu/JamtshoSangay
Scott, R. M. (2010). Word Search instruction: Enhancing reading comprehension.
Retrieved from
http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/literacynumeracy/inspire/research/ww_word_st
udy.pdf
Stirling, J. (2003). Remedial spelling in EFL. Retrieved from
http://www.elgweb.net/spelling_article.html
Topfer, C. (n.d.). Teaching Spelling: What do we need to teach in order to help
children develop into effective spellers?. Retrieved from
http://www.decd.sa.gov.au/northernadelaide/files/links/spellin_1.pdf
University of Queensland Library. (n.d.). References/Bibliography APA: Based on the
“Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association 6th
edition.
Retrieved from
https://www.library.uq.edu.au/_/filething/files/get/referencing/apa_6%202.pdf
Zimmer, B. (2008). “Ghoti” before Shaw. Retrieved from
http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=81
57
Appendix A: Questionnaire
Questionnaire
Instruction: Please answer all questions honestly and carefully.
Student’s Name: ___________________________________
1. Do you think you can spell new words correctly?
Answer:
____________________________________________________________
2. How do you spell new words? Describe the strategy that you used.
Answer:
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
58
Appendix B(i): Onset and rime worksheets for Intervention 1
b eep ut f i
k ay c e h
j ce ap ift oot
ept g esk d gg
59
Appendix B(ii): Onset and rime worksheets for Intervention 2
sn aint ild ed f
awn owl m b p
w ch ail ise urch
ose d
60
Appendix B(iii): Onset and rime worksheets for Intervention 3
m f ield ance et
d inse b v p
ch erb ig aid ap
r t ug ore sn
61
Appendix B(iv): Onset and rime worksheets for Intervention 4
fl ew b ain old
oot sn ap ough gr
aint r st t ow
m ag ame
Top Related