Download - Comparisons between hospitals

Transcript
Page 1: Comparisons between hospitals

Comparisons between hospitals

Many hospitals which are currently collecting data are not included

because too few data are available.

Page 2: Comparisons between hospitals

How can these data help improve patient care?

• By identifying methods which increase performance?

• By highlighting services requiring more investment or re design

Page 3: Comparisons between hospitals

A normal distribution

02

4

68

10

12

1416

18

20

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

Mean = 10Median = 10

Days

No.

Page 4: Comparisons between hospitals

A skewed distribution

02

4

68

10

12

1416

18

20

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

Mean = 7.3Median = 6

Days

No.

Page 5: Comparisons between hospitals

A very skewed distribution

02

4

68

10

12

1416

18

20

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

Mean = 4.9Median = 3

Days

No.

Page 6: Comparisons between hospitals

Inpatients

Page 7: Comparisons between hospitals

Dates of Data Collection

Hospital Date Started End DateARI 01/09/2000 31/10/2003DGRI 01/01/2003 01/07/2003Raigmore 09/06/2003 21/11/2003RIE 16/05/2001 21/03/2003St Johns 01/04/2001 30/10/2003WGH 01/07/2001 30/06/2003

Page 8: Comparisons between hospitals

No. of Stroke admissions available for analysis

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

ARI DGRI Raigmore RIE St J WGH

Page 9: Comparisons between hospitals

Measures of Access to Stroke Unit

• Proportion admitted to any stroke unit

• Proportion of in patient stay spent on stroke unit

• Delay from admission to entry to stroke unit

Could add

• Proportion entering stroke unit within 1 day of admission

Page 10: Comparisons between hospitals

Proportions admitted to Stroke Unit

01020304050

60708090

100

ARI DGRI Raigmore RIE StJ WGH

Page 11: Comparisons between hospitals

Mean Delay in accessing SU

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

ARI DGRI Raigmore RIE StJ WGH

Page 12: Comparisons between hospitals

St Johns Hospital

• St Johns had only 47% accessing stroke unit– have now obtained funding to increase beds

from 11 to 17– Have employed a staff grade doctor and

therapists to help run additional beds

Page 13: Comparisons between hospitals

Proportions scanned within 2 days of admission

01020304050

60708090

100

ARI DGRI Raigmore RIE StJ WGH

Page 14: Comparisons between hospitals

Length of Stay in HospitalMean Median

05

10152025

3035404550

ARI DGRI Raigmore RIE StJ WGH

Page 15: Comparisons between hospitals

Proportion of ischaemic stroke discharged on secondary prevention

0102030405060708090

100

DGRI Raigmore RIE St J WGH

AntiplateletStatinDiureticACE I

Page 16: Comparisons between hospitals

Proportions of patients with ischaemic stroke and AF discharged on Warfarin

01020304050

60708090

100

DGRI Raigmore RIE StJ WGH

Page 17: Comparisons between hospitals

Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh

• Low rates of discharge on secondary prevention

• Need to check some notes to see if contraindicated

• Need to introduce a secondary prevention protocol and police it

Page 18: Comparisons between hospitals

Neurovascular clinics

Page 19: Comparisons between hospitals

Dates of Data Collection

Hospital Date Started End DateDGRI 01/01/2003 01/07/2003St Johns 01/04/2001 30/10/2003WGH 01/07/2001 30/06/2003

Page 20: Comparisons between hospitals

No. of Neurovascular Clinic patients available for analysis

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

DGRI St J WGH

Page 21: Comparisons between hospitals

Diagnoses in Neurovascular clinic

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

DGRI StJ WGH

StrokeTIAEyeOther

Page 22: Comparisons between hospitals

Median delay from referral to assessment (days)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

DGRI StJ WGH

Page 23: Comparisons between hospitals

Delays from Assessment to Duplex (days)

0

5

10

15

20

25

DGRI St J WGH

MeanMedian

Page 24: Comparisons between hospitals

Delays from Assessment to Brain scan for stroke (days)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

DGRI St J WGH

MeanMedian

Page 25: Comparisons between hospitals

Delays from Assessment to Echo for stroke/TIA (days)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

DGRI St J WGH

MeanMedian

Page 26: Comparisons between hospitals

Delays to investigation

• WGH has got Duplex system sorted

• DGRI - have got CT scanning sorted

• St Johns has got echo system sorted

Page 27: Comparisons between hospitals

Treatment of Definite Ischaemic events with aspirin

0102030405060708090

100

DGRI St J WGH

At eventAssessmentRecommended

Page 28: Comparisons between hospitals

Treatment of Definite Ischaemic events with dipyridamole

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

DGRI St J WGH

At eventAssessmentRecommended

Page 29: Comparisons between hospitals

Treatment of Definite Ischaemic events with clopidogrel

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

DGRI St J WGH

At eventAssessmentRecommended

Page 30: Comparisons between hospitals

Treatment of Neurovascular clinic patients with definite ischaemic

events with BP lowering

0102030405060708090

100

DGRI St J WGH

At eventAssessmentRecommended