1
TheModernOrdinary:
ChangingcultureoflivinginEgypt’straditionalquartersattheturnofthetwentiethCentury
Abstract
Havingexperiencedsocialandpoliticalstructuresofthe19thcenturyEurope,Western-educatedEgyptianeliteusedpublicinstitutionstoforcelegislativestructuresandproceduresthatruledouttraditionalhousingformsandspatialsystems.ThisessaydetectsdirectandindirectimpactofthesechangesthatinformedthespatialchangeofmodernlivinginEgyptinthefirstquarterofthetwentiethcentury.Itoffersanalysisofsocio-spatialpracticesandchangeinordinaryCairenes’modesofeverydayliving,usingsocialroutineandinteractiontoexplainspatialsystemsandchanginghouseformsduringthefirstquarterofthe20thcentury.Indoingso,theessayutilizedarchivaldocuments,accounts,formaldecrees,andnovelsofthetimeaswellasconductingsurveyofhouseformsandspatialorganizationsinOldCairo.
INTRODUCTION
‘Cairo,therefore,willnolongerbeanArabcity,andwillnolongerpossessthosepeculiaritieswhichrenderitsopicturesqueandattractive’1.
SophieLane-Poole
Inthefirstparagraphofhisbook,ThestoryofCairo,StanleyLane-Pooledescribedthecityof
1902bysaying:‘TherearetwoCairos,distinctincharacter,thoughbutslenderlyinsite.Thereis
aEuropeanCairo,andthereisanEgyptianCairo.ThelastwasoneEl-Kahira,thevictorious...itis
nowsolittleconquering,indeedhasbecomesosubdued...intruthEuropeanCairoknowslittle
ofitsmedievalsister’2.Thisgraspoftheexplicitdifferencessummarizesthecity’sdevelopment
throughoutthenineteenthcentury,theperiodthatwitnessedthesetbackforthehawarifrom
beingdominanttobeingmarginalurbancommunities.MuhammadAli(1805-1849)3,
intentionally,hadbannedalltracesofmedievalarchitectureandtheirstylisticpeculiaritiesfor
differentreasons.BanningtheuseofMashrabiyyainnewbuildingswasmadeunderthepretext
ofhealthandsafety4;asitwasmadeofwood,itcouldcausefire5.Thetruthbehindthisban
couldbeunderstoodifweconsiderthelargerplanbehindchangingtheimageofthemedieval6.
Itwasadecisivediversionfromthemedievalpastthrough,forexample,wideningtheroads,
2
creatingsquaresandgardens,paintingthehousesinwhite,andadoptingnewhousingmodels.
Inshort,hewasputtingamodernmaskontheoldcityfabricandsoonrealizeditwasnot
possible.
Followingalmostfivedecadesandconfrontationalstrugglewiththecapital’sresidentsand
localcommunities,Ali’splanscouldbeseenasasuccess.Hence,incontrasttoMuhammadAli’s
approach,KediveIsmail(1863-1879)abandonedthehopeofimprovingthehawariandfocused
onproducingorganized,plannedwesternhomesinthesuburboftheoldcity.Toachievethis
goal,araftoflegislationwasproducedtocontrolbuildingactivitiesandsetstandardsfor
building,modifyingormaintaininghomes.Withinthiscontext,thehawariwereslowlychanging
fromtheirmedievalimageintoamorecomplexandmoderncharacter.Changewasa
consequenceofacombinedsetoffactors.Fromoneside,socialstructureoflocalareaswas
significantlychanging,onthebackofemergenceofwestern-styledandcivilizedcentresoutside
theoldcity,whichattractedrichmerchantstorelocate,leavingoldhawarideprivedoftheirrich
inhabitantsandresources.Fromtheotherside,thegovernmentstartedtoimplementaheavy
handedpolicytocontrolthebuiltenvironmentandurbanspacewiththeaimofenforcinga
European-styleimage(aEuropeannationintheEast)7.Theembryonicformandimageof
plannedCairowereunmistakeableattheturnofthetwentiethcentury,whiletheharah‘s
positionasafundamentalurbanunithadforeverbeencompromisedbythewell-established
andmaintainedIsmailia(European)Cairo.
Throughoutthenineteenthcentury,Cairowasmovingtowardsanindustrialeconomy,
requiringmanypeasantstojointhenewly-establishedfactoriesandtoearnregularwages.
MuhammadAli’s(1805-1849)projectformodernCairocommencedwithcleaningthehawari
andpaintingbuildings’facadesinwhite,demolishingruinedhousesandregulatingstreet
lighting,andfaçadedesigns.However,hismostimportantcontributiontothechangingurban
settingwasthefocusonlargesizeindustrialprojectssuchascottonandoilfactories,which
requiredlargenumbersofregularworkers.Thosecamefromthecountryside,thetroubledand
unstablecountrysidevillages,searchingforsecurejobsinCairoandlookingforcheap
accommodation8.Thissituationappliedheavypressureonthehawari:analreadycongested
spacewithpoorandlowqualityservices,toaccommodatethewavesofnewmigrantworkers.
Ontheotherhand,latenineteenthcenturydevelopmentsmadebyEuropeanreal-estate
companiesattractedtherichmerchantsduetotheirEuropeanflavour,pavedandlit
3
boulevards9.Theplaceofsuchinfluentialplayersinlocalcommunitiesoftheoldcitywasfilled
bythosepoorpeasantmigrantswhocametojointhenewwagedworkingclass.Theyoccupied
roofsofhousesandvacantplots,creatingtheIshash10andAhwash11.Thismovedthehawari
downinthesocialladder,withtheirphysicalstructure,thebuildings,fallingintodisrepairdueto
lackofmaintenanceandfinancialresources.
Asaresult,thehawarioftheearly20thcenturywerenolongerthepreferredsitesforthe
merchants’homes.Largecourtyardhouseswere,consequently,replacedbycompactmulti-
storeyhouses.Introvertedorganizationofhomeswasturnedinside-out,withlargeopeningson
thecentrallane.Thedominanthousetype,then,wasathree-fourlevel,load-bearing,compact
building,whichseemedtohavefollowedearlymodelhousesofMuhammadAlithatfailedto
catchonduringhislifetime(Fig.1).ThehardboundaryandtighteningurbanareaofoldCairo,
surroundedbynewdevelopmentsofIsmailiCairo,madeinevitablethedeclineofthe
historically-dominantmodelofcourtyardhouses.Theextendedfamilystructure,thecoreof
community,hadtofindalternativewaystoresideinsmallerplotswithloweraffordability.
StudyingoldCairooverthatextendedperiodoftimehastoconsidersuchsocialandeconomic
change.Infact,untiltheearlydecadesofthetwentiethcentury,themainheadlineintheurban
sceneinCairowasthetransformationtowardsmodernity.
Whilemanystudieslookedatchangesintermsofpoliticalculture,socialchangeor
architecturalstyle,Ilookinthisessayatthemulti-layeredandprolongedeffortsthat
demarcatedalmostfivedecadesofsocio-culturaltransformationthatenabledthechangein
livingcondition,lifestyleandculturalvalues,notsimplyinthemodernquarters,butmoresoin
thehawariofthemedievalcity.Ilookintohowthedreamofmodernityinfluencedtheideaof
homebothsociallyandspatially.Thisessayarguesthatwhiletheliberalvaluesofmodernity
wereembodiedinanationalistagendathatattemptedtobreakwiththedeeplyrooted
traditionsandmysticalcultureofthepast,thechangeofthespatialsystemsofhouseforms
havelargelybeeninfluencedbythechangeisthesocialstructureandeconomiccapabilitiesof
thoselivingintheoldcity.Itreportsthatthischangecouldbetracedthroughthreepathwaysof
changeinCairenehomes;a.Restructuringthelegalsystemthatgovernedthedesignand
constructionofhouses;b.Reformingeducationtofocusondomesticmannersandbehavior;and
c.Foundingprofessionaltrainingonidealsofmodernarchitecture.
4
THEGENDERQUESTION:WOMENASPUBLICFIGURES
Earlyforcesofchangeemergedwhenwestern-educatedEgyptianelites,onreturninghome
fromtheireducationalmissionsinEurope(mainlyFrance)inthesecondhalfofNineteenth
Century,wereappointedtoleadnationalgovernmentalandculturalinstitutions12.Their
objectivewastoemulatetheEuropeanmodelofknowledgeandphilosophywithintheconfines
oftheirnationalterritoryandwithrespecttotheirlocalcultureandtraditionasweseeinthe
writingsofGamalEl-Dinal-Afghani,MuhammadAbdu,Rifa’aAl-TahtawiandQasimAmin13.
WhilethefirstthreefigureswerereligiousscholarswithprogressiveviewsonIslam,thefourth
wasofcivilianbackground.Theyusedmediaoutletsandinstitutionsavailabletothemto
propagateideologicalreformespeciallythroughcontestingradicalcultureandrestrictionson
freedomofthought,practice,andknowledgeaswellasthediscriminativegendersegregationof
thetime.Asmedievalcultureandsocialconventionswerecentredonfamilyandthepositionof
women,theharem,thereformersconsideredwomenastheirprincipalissueforthereform
movement.Whileschoolsofbothsexes(femalesandmales)hadbeenavailablesincetheearly
nineteenthcentury,theradicalSheikhsinsistedthatwomenshouldstayathomeattheservice
ofmen,secludedfromstrangers,withtheirfreedomlimitedtoharemenclosures14.These
currentsofreform,especiallyregardingthepositionofwomen,werestrongenoughto
underlinetheissuespublicallywithinperiodicalssuchasAllataifduringthelate19thcentury.
Thewomenquestionwasatthecentreofthiselitistmovementthathadextensively
questionedthemarginalandoppressedpositionofwomeninthepredominantlypatriarch
cultureofhouseholdsthatexcludedthemfromeducation,workandpubliclife.Itwasapparent
thattheelites’callfortheliberationofwomenandtheirrightstoeducationmovedthewomen
fromtheirperipheralpositiontobeatthecentreofmodernizingEgypt.Thesedebateshad
inevitablyextendedtoquestionthespatialorganizationofhousesandthewaytheharem
quarterwasisolated.Fortheelites,thiswasnolongerasuitablespatialorderformodernEgypt.
Theintellectualdebateonthepositionofwomanwithinsocietyhaddestabilizedthetraditional
formofcourtyardhouse,invitingradicalchangetowardsaformofsharedtenancyinmulti-story
apartmentbuildings.Women’ssocialsphereofactivitieshadsignificantlychangedandthe
tolerancetowardswomen’sexposureinthepublicscenecombinedwiththeshrinkageof
domesticareasresultedinmoreintegratedenvironmentbetweenprivateandpublicspaces.
5
Women’spositioninsocietywasthenlookedatasanindicatoraccordingtowhichtheliberal
valuesofmodernsocietiesweremeasuredinaconservativeregionsuchasEgyptandthe
MiddleEast.Cairo,duetoitsproximityandlinkswithEurope,wasthecentreofactive
developmenttowardsmodernitythroughoutthenineteenthandtwentiethcentury.Itwasthe
turnofthetwentiethcenturywhichseemedtheperiodduringwhichEgyptiansocietystartedto
cometotermswiththevaluesofmodernityandliberalsociety.Thiswasexplicitinthe
persistentcallforculturalandideologicalreformbytheintellectualelitesinlocalnewspapers
sincelate1870sthatcontinuedforsomefiftyyearsdefininganeraofenlightenmentandreform
thatchallengedtheinheritedmedievalthought15.Returningelitesbelievedthatwithout
changingthementalityofthepeople,leadingthenationtomodernityisalmostimpossible16.
ThedesirewastoemulatetheEuropeanmodelofknowledgeandphilosophywithinthe
confinesofnationalterritoryandwithrespecttotheirlocalcultureandtradition.
FORThereformers,inordertoattendtobemodern,Egyptianshadtoengagewiththe
knowledge,scientificandphilosophicalprogressofthewest17,andtheindicationofthiswasto
acceptwomenasequalmembersinaliberalsociety.Theycorrelatedthefreedomofwomento
thesocialfreedomandtheprogressofthenation18.TheApexofconflictwiththeconservatives
cameafterthepublishingofQasemAmin’sTahriral-Mar’aa(LiberationofWoman)in1899that
wasaprotestovertheradicalconstraintsonwomen’seducationandwork19.Thebookwas
introducedbyShaykhMuhammadAbdu(thehighestReligiousfigure,theEgyptianMufti),what
gaveitextensivemediaattentionandcriticismfromconservativeandradicalleaders20.
Interestingly,boththereformersandtheradicalsheikhsagreedonthecentralityofwomen
totheprogressofthenation,buteachinownterms.Thereformersfoundnocontradiction
betweenIslamandwesternmodernitybasedonwomen’sequalrights,toeducation,work,and
participationifpubliclife.Ontheotherside,theconservativesbelievedthatwomenshould
remainisolatedathomeandfocusontheirdomesticduties.Theformers’thoughtsand
principlesspreadthroughoutthegrowingnumberofperiodicalsandprivately-ownedprinting
pressesbythesecondhalfofthecentury.ByronD.Cannonarguedthatsocialandcultural
changewasactuallytakingplaceintheprevioustwodecadesandthebookwasjustarticulation
ofthecurrentstreamofthoughts21.Hereferredtoarticlesappearedinal-Lata’ifmagazine
duringthe1880s,handlingthesameissues,althoughinlessrevolutionaryways.Theharem
system,theprincipalfeatureofmedievalculture,however,cametoanend,asBerthBadran
6
claimed,by1923whenHudaSharawi,thewell-knownEgyptianfeminist,drewbackherveilin
public.Later,manyhadreplicatedherapproachandhighclasswomeneschewedtheveilaspart
oftheirdressingstyle22.
Themostnotableachievementofthemovementrestedinthepublicdiscourseabout
women’spositioninsocietyandtheintroductionofthenewwomanasanactivememberinthe
publicdomain23.Unlikethetraditionalone,thenewwomanwaseducated,active,madegood
useoftime,wasnotpreytosuperstitionandirrationalthinking,whileretainhercommitments
toherfamilyandchildren24.Aseducated,activeandproductive,thenewwomenshouldnotbe
limitedtotheharem,theisolatedquarterinthehouse.Thenewwomanwasthemeasureto
whichthesocietywascomparedtoitsEuropeancounterpart,ashowfaritattendedtothe
compulsoryrequirementsofmodernity.Furthermore,Egyptiansociologistsarguedthatthe
reformmovementhasshapednotonlythenewwoman,butalsothenewman,wholikesawell
presentedandorderedhome,hasgoodtaste,andadmirepleasantstructures25.Thenewman
wassensitive,emotionalandwouldonlychoosehispartnerthroughdirectinteractionand
emotionalcompanionship,somethingthatwasrejectedentirelybytheconservativeculture.In
fact,thenewmanandwomanwerepicturedasEuropeancharactersineasterncontext.
LIVINGDOWNTOWN:EUROPEANMODERNITYOF19thCENTURY
“Thedwelling’svalueasasocialinstitutionthatorganizedacquaintanceshipandCertifiedpubliccharacteremergedincontradictiontotheperceivedlimitationanddangersofalternativehousingforms.Incontrasttothecarefullyregulatedsocial
trafficofhomehospitality,boardingandtenanthousesappearedsocialpromiscuous,nonselective,andimmediatelyvulnerabletomarketdeterminationsofpersonalworth.Tenanthousingrelations,incontrast,wereperceivedasimposing
nosocialaccountabilityformoraltransgressions.”26
InHousingandDwelling,BarbaraMillerLanemadethecaseforthetransitionoflivingfrom
localesandcommunitiestothedowntownoflargecitiesasashiftofsocialandspatial
significanceofthelate19thcentury27.ApartmentbuildingsinNewYork,ParisandLondonaswell
asthoseofIsmailiCairoandIstanbulallowedfamiliestomoveoutoftheirproductive
communitieswithlonginheritedsocio-culturalsystems.Themovetowardsprestigious
downtownswithwideboulevardsandapartmentbuildingswasinspiredbyEuropeanswhohad
7
beenlivinginapartmentbuildingsforgenerations,andbythesecondhalfofthenineteenth
century,Parisianapartmentbuildingswerethefashionablemodeltoimitateinbigcities(Fig.
2)28.Thenewtenancysystemwasbasedontheideaofbeingindependentwithlifestyles
inscribedbymobilityandconnectivityinthenewquarters.Noself-sufficiency,nointimatesocial
coherencewithinthelocality.MarketedatthetimeinNewYorkas‘Parisiandwellings’,Parisian
Buildings’or‘FrenchFlats’29inNewYorkornineteenthcenturyCairoas‘ParisontheNile’,the
thenEuropeaninspirationexemplifiedhowfartheFrenchmodeloflivingwasasubscriptionfor
enlightenedandelitistsocialclassandanabandonmentofthetraditionalandoldpre-industrial
communityliving.Theurbanchangederivedbyfreedomtomoveeasilyandfrequentlybothin
locationandinsocialstatusfosteredanxietiesforfamiliesthatwantedtoasserttheirsocial
statusintheemergingnewterritoriesandcircumstances30.
Itwasarguedthatthistransitionwasaby-productofearlynineteenthcenturymiddleclass
effortsinplanningreform,developinghouseholdtechnologies,andthechangingaspirationof
workingclasspeople31.Theriseofthebourgeoisclassesandtheirdelicatelivingcultureand
lifestyleowemuchtotheriseofthoseEuropeanhousingmodelsassociatedwithliberalvalues
thatflourishedduringlate1920sand1930sinCairo.Thehighlypicturesqueanddecorated
nineteenthcenturyapartmentbuildingsinCairo,AlexandriaorinAlbanyandBroadwayinNew
Yorkappearedmassiveintermsofsizeandheightwithintheirlocalcontextual.Theirmulti-
apartmentfloorplans,occupiedbytradesmen,merchantsandforeignbusinessmen,extended
tomorethanthesizeoffourhousesofthetime.Widewrought-ironbalconieswerethemost
uniqueelementofthenewdomesticlivinginthenineteenthcentury.FortheCairenes,for
example,suchexplicitoutwardexposuretostranger-onlookersfromasdeepastheheartofthe
privatehome,wastotallyrejectedintheoldquartersthatreliedchieflyoninner,visually
protectedcourtyards.Moreover,toliveadjacenttostrangertenantsinthesamebuildingand
sometimesonthesamefloormeantashiftinthesocio-spatialboundariesofprivacyfromthe
medievalgatestotheverydooroftheapartmentandonlyafewmetersawayfromthe
bedroom.Inaddition,therewasnospaceforthetraditionallargeteamofservantsinthenew
apartments.Theconnectionwitheverydayactivitiesinthestreetwaslostinfavourofmore
mobilityandopportunitiesforengagementwiththewidersociety.Thisledtoanearlytransition
towardsmodernityanddisjuncturewiththenotionoflocalityandsocialcoherence.Instead,
8
modernsocietywiththecentralityoftheselfbecamethecriterionofthenewlifeinthenewly
shapedurbanliving.
Astenancyhousingproliferatedinthenewquarters,oldquarterswitnessedmigrant
countrymenandlowerclassresidentsfillinginspacesandbuildingsabandonedbythedeparting
merchantsandprofessionals.Whiletherewasgenerousprovisionofservicesandinfrastructure
tothenewareas,oldquarters’qualityoflivingwasshattered.Previouscourtyardhouseswere
dividedintosmallerunitsofone-roomortworoomapartmentsforsharedandboarding
accommodationsandtheoldhomogeneouscommunitieswerepolarisedbetweengenuine
residentsandnewsettlers.Onmanyoccasions,migrantworkershadtobehousedinold
warehousesorformermiddleclassapartmentbuildings,whichweredividedintosmallerunits,
notahealthyarrangementasmanyoftheroomswerewithoutproperventilation.Forexample,
in1900,ParkAvenueand109thStreetinNewYorkCitywerefilledwithcountrymigrants,with
manyofthetypicaltwobedroomedDumbbellfloorplansturnedintounitsofsingleroom
accommodationperfamily.Smallerroomsweredark,withoutproperventilation.Shared
courtyardswerefilledwithservices,creatinganunpleasantappearance,allofwhichcontributed
tothepassingofTheAmericanTenementHouseActsof1867&1879thatprohibitedcellar
apartmentsunlesscertainhealthconditionsweremet.
THEQUESTIONOFIDENTITY:BUILDINGTHEEUROPEANCAIRO
FollowingthesecampaignsandlegislativestructuresinwhatwascalledStateBuilding;Cairowas
settoreceivethenewmodelsofapartmenthousebuildingsaspartofitsfabric,givingwayto
theemergenceofnewtypologythatcombinedgroundfloorshopsandstoreswithhigherlevel
floorsofhousingunits,mainlyinthenewquarters.SuchEurope-inspiredmodelbecamemore
acceptableintheearlydecadesofthetwentiethcentury,whenwomen’smovementand
accessibilitywerenolongerfundamentalissuesinhouseplanningordesign.Initiallystartedas
housesforforeigners,theirrichlocalcounterpartssoonbecameresidentofthesebuildings.In
fact,thiswasoneapproachrichEgyptiansfollowedtoupgradetheirsociallifestyletoprove
theirabilitytostandmodernintheurbansceneinEgypt.AtatimewhenEgyptwasstillunder
theBritishcolonialrulein1910s-1920s,thediscourseonmodernity;‘howmodernwere
Egyptians’and‘thereformofEgypt'shomes’,wascentraltotheprocessthroughwhichmiddle-
9
classCairenesdefinedthemselvesasmodernandprogressiveindissidenceagainstdismissive
toneofthecolonialrulers32.
LisaPollardarguedthatBourgeoisiemaleEgyptiansof1919sattachednationalmeaningsof
solidaritytotheirdomestichabitsaspartoftheirnationalidentity;“Men'smaritalbehaviorand
domestichabitsappearedcentraltodemonstratingEgypt'sreadinessforself-rule.”33Inorderto
becomemodern,youneedtoactlikeoneandyourattitudetohomeandfamilyistherefore
pivotal.Infact,Pollardlistedahostofreadingsandeducationaltextbooksaround1905-1911
thatcommunicatedthenewhomeanditsmannersofmodernitytochildrenthroughsimple
wordsandquestions.Forexample,areadertitled‘ReadingandPronunciation’askedquestions
suchas,‘Whatdoproperhomesneed?’and‘Howdowebuildproperhouses?’whichwere
answeredthatmodernlifestylerequired,similartothoseusedbythereformmovement,‘order,
cleanlinessandventilation.’Forthem,‘darkorcrowdedquarterswerelistedasbelongingto
anotherworld,apremodernworldwhichhadtobedoneawaywithsuchthataneweraof
modernitycouldbeusheredin’34.Thiscouldjustifyparticulararchitecturaltransformationand
predominanceofcertainformsofthetime.Inthatsense,paralleltothedeclineof
mashrabiyyahasoldfashion,openterracesoverlookinglargestreetsboulevardsrepresented
thesymptomofmodernlivinginCairoandothercitiessuchasAlexandria.(Fig.3)
Theprocessofstructurededucationonmodernityandmodernliving,indeedreachedtothe
professionaltrainingofemergingengineeringschoolsthatsoonbecameapparentintheworkif
theirgraduates.By1930s,designdrawingsforhouseslargelyfollowedthistrend.Theliberation
ofwomenfromtheharemwings,facilitiesbynationalmodernists,easedtheburdenoflarge
housesandforcedarationalspaceorganisation.Infact,housedesignsoftwoprominent
Egyptianarchitectsduring1930sshowedhowdominantmodernopen-buildingformswere.
HassanFathyearlyworkandRamsesWissaWassifdesignsofhomesofthetimearetestimony
onthat.In(Fig.4)HassanFathy,knownforhisadmirationoftraditionalbuildingtechniquesat
laterstages,displaysafairlyoutward-orientedfloorplanofapartment-officebuildingswith
largebalconyandopeningdirectlyopentotherooms’interiors.Accesstothehouseunitand
fromislargelyexposedtopublicview.Eventhoughdesignedoutsidetheoldcity,itdenotesa
departurefromthementalityofenclosuresandmanipulationofspaceadvocatedbythe
traditionalformsofthehawari.IfFathy’sdesignswereoutsidethehistoricalcore,RamsesWissa
WassifDiplomaProjectof1930swasintheOldcity.Wassif’sworkshowedadegreeof
10
uncertaintyandtensionbetweenthevalueofthecontextualfabricandtheidealsofmodernity
ofthetimewiththeuseofconcreteandsquarespacesarrangedaroundacourtyard,however,
anopenone(Fig.5).
However,withthecolonialrulecomingtoanend,thesocialistagendatookoverwithmore
focusonsocialequityandtheidealsofmassproductionofhousingleadingthenotionofhome
tobeindustriousandeconomicinprinciple.Thisresembledafundamentaldeparturefrom
socialdomainofinteractiontobedrivenbyauthoritativestatepoliciesmanagementofpublic
properties,withseriousviolationoflocalsocialcohesionandbreakdownofthesocio-spatial
association,witnessedintheoldcity.DuringNasser’sprojectsofsocialhousing,thespatial
organisationofhomedeniedanyopportunityofprivacyandlocalcontrolonthebuilt
environment.Movingfromstate-ledsocialhousingprojectstoprivatedevelopersoflate1970s,
themodernisttypologiesofisolatedanddisconnectedapartmentbuildingsdominatedthe
urbansceneinCairo.Duringthatperiod,theideaofhomeassocialconstructrepresented,toa
largeextent,awithdrawalofsociallycohesivecommunitiesandthemakingofhomeaswayof
buildingsociety.WhilethepositionofwomenwaslargelycentraltotheideaofhomeinOld
Cairo,newhousesofmodernityexposedthevulnerabilityofthefamilyandtheirprocessesof
communalandcontextualexistence,atleastinnewneighbourhoodsthatwerebombardedwith
massesofconcretegiantsthatareeconomicmodelsofconsumption.
THELEGISLATIONQUESTION:CHANGINGPROFESSIONANDCULTUREOFLIVING
Thenewperspectivesandtolerancetowardsthemovementandinteractionofwomenwithin
thesocietyresultedinsimplerandlesscomplexhouselayout.Extensivemeasuresofisolating
theharemwerenolongercompulsory.Themodelofindependent,self-sufficientcourtyard
housewasnolongerasuccessfuloraffordablemodeltofollow.Thiswasevidentinthe
increasinglyrelaxedandsimplifiedorganizationofthehousesbuiltbetween1880sand1920s
andtheincrementalnumberofextrovertapartmentbuildingconstruction,eitherintheoldcity
orthenewquartersequally.FewlargehousesinthehawariofoldCairo,retainedthetraditional
courtyardhousesbutwithmucheasieraccesstoroomsaroundit,includingtheharem.
Transparencybecameacceptableinthehouseandcorridorshavebeenlitanddirecttowards
11
therooms,whilewindowsstartedtohaveglasspanes,asweseeinBaytAl-Kharazi(1881AD).In
short,theideaofhomewaschanginginthementalityoflocalpeople.
Ontheotherhand,thereferencetothedelicatetasteandsensitivityofthenewcharacters
requiredformodernEgyptwouldessentiallyrequireachangedhome.Hence,thedebate
betweentheoldandthenewandsubsequentconfrontationsamongbothofthemcontinued
duringthefirsthalfofthetwentiethcenturyandnaturallyextendedtotheterritoryofhome
thatrequired,accordingtothereformers,anequalchangeinitsstructure.Itwasnecessaryto
makeaconvincingeconomicreasoningthatmadesensetotheincreasinglypoorEgyptiansas
wellasamongeducatedEgyptians.QassimAmincriticizedthecomplexityofgender-segregated
housesinCairoinTheLiberationofWoman:‘Lookatus,youfindourhouseisdividedintotwo
parts,oneformenandanotherforwomen.Whenweneedtobuildahouse,ineffect,wespend
whatisenoughfortwohouses[twoattachedhouses].....Thisincludesfurnitureforeachofthe
twohouses,twoteamsofservants,oneformenandanotherforwomen.’35Inaddition,he
applaudedtheWesternmiddleclasshousethatis‘wellorganized,morebeautifulthanits
orientalcounterpart,eventhoughtheEuropeanspendsmuchlessthattheArab’36.
Thisattackonthetraditionalformsofhouseswascoordinatedamongotherreformers.
Almostadecadeearlier,AliPashaMubarak,theministerofPublicWork,andinjustificationto
theinitiationofmunicipalsystemthatlimiteddesignandconstructionofhousestotrained
professional,launchedacomprehensivecriticismfortraditionalformoflivingrulingitas
inefficientandunhealthy.Inhisinfamousandboldstatement,Mubarakstated:
‘TodaypeoplehaveabandonedoldwaysofconstructioninfavouroftheEuropean
stylebecauseofitsmorepleasantappearance,betterstandardsandlowercosts.Inthe
newsystem,roomsareeithersquareorrectangularinshape.Intheoldsystem,living
roomstogetherwiththeirdependenciesweredisorderedcorridorsandcourtyards
occupyingalotofspace...mostofthespaceslackedfreshairandsunlight,whicharethe
essentialcriteriaforhealth.Thushumidityaccumulatedinthesespacescausing
disease...facadesneverfollowedanygeometricorderthuslookinglikethoseof
cemeteries.Inthenewsystemfacadesareorderedandhavegoodfamiliarlook’.37
AliMubarak,Al-Khitatal-Tawfiqiyyah,1888.
12
Mubarak’scriticism,infact,wasdesignedtomakecaseforwesternformsoflivingthat
followssimplerorderandgeometricprinciples.But,toacceptnewforms,youmustdismissthe
longrootedandacceptedmodelsasproblematicandwasteful,whilebeingunhealthy.Infact,
onesentenceinparticularwasstriking;hedismissedthe‘disorderedcorridorsandcourtyards
occupyingalotofspace’,whichheknewaspeculiartolocaltraditionandpartofthelocalsocial
systemsinOldCairo,centredaroundthemovementofwomenandensuringadequatelevelof
privacy.Indeed,asofficialandreformer,hewaspromotingwesternlifestylethroughthe
Parisian-typologyofthetimewithitscompactformsofapartmentbuildingsthatrelyonthe
independenceofthelivingunit,disconnectionfromwidestreetboulevardsandgeometrically
orderedarrayofwindowsthatexposetheinteriorofthehousetotheoutsideworld.
Ontheotherhand,activepubliclifeinthelocalalleysdidnotsurvivetheseinstitutional
reforms.Thehawari’ssociallifewaschallengedbyaseriesoflawsaimingtochangethephysical
featuresandorganizationofthosespaces.Between1880and1910,variouslawswereissuedto
putthepublicsphereintoashapeandorderthatsuitedtherulingregime’sdesiredimage.The
clearestattemptappearedinthedecreeissuedbytheMinistryofPublicWorkson22ndFebruary
1882,wherebyArticle12wasintendedtocleartheroadsofthestoneseatsspreadacrossthe
oldcity(Fig.6).Itsays:“Allstructuresintrudingfromthebuildingintotheroad,suchasstone
seats,stairs,shouldberemovedwiththeexceptionofhistoric,religiousorartisticallyvalued
buildingsuntiltheirfacadesarerefurbishedonthealignmentline”38.Article13ofthesame
decreeinstructedthat“allexistingarchesonpublicroadsshouldbedemolishedoncetheyare
damagedorattachedstructuresaretoberestored[refurbished].”Itcontinued:“The
constructionofthosearchesonpublicroadsisprohibitedfromnowon”39.
Whilethestoneseatswereremovedandre-builtseveraltimes,itispresumedthat
legislationsrelatingtopermissionandfeesforpublicfestivitieswerenotimplemented,atleast
inOldCairo40.ItwasapparentthatthegovernmentwantedtodealwitholdCairoandits
hawariasitdidwithIsmailiCairowithitspavedandwideboulevards.Theregulatorsand
officialsdidnotunderstandthatthepublicsphereofthehawari,includingitsphysicalfeatures
(stoneseats,stairs)andsocialevents(festivitiesandmawlids),wereessentialpartsoflocal
cultureanddailylife.Theyhousedessentialeconomicactivities,servingfoodtovisitorsfor
13
mawlidsthatflourishedthroughouttheyear[R4.2.08].Removingtheseatsandgetting
permissionforusingpublicspacescouldhaveeliminatedmostgatheringsandbasicsocio-
culturalpatternsoflife.
Furthermore,tolateradeeplyrootedprofessionandtraditionalbuildingpractices,afirm
controloftheadministrativeorlegislativestructureswasneeded.Followingseveralattempts
byKediveTawfiq(1879-1892)andHabbasHelmi(1892-1914)toorganizeactivitiessuchas
building,trading,crime,andtaxation,ataxcouncilwasformedin1886,comprisingelectedlocal
buildingowners,tocontrolbuildingactivities.Theultimatetransformationtowardsamodern
state,thought,entailedthereformofitsgovernmentalandmunicipalstructure.Tanzim
departmentwasdevelopedtheleadinginstitutionattemptingtohandletheconfusingstructure
andurbanorder41.Thelegislationsmightappeartohavebeennecessaryfororganizationofthe
growingmetropolitanCairo.However,theinfluenceoftheEuropeans,especiallytheFrench
engineers,wasapparent.Duringthelastquarterofthenineteenthcentury,French-educated
Egyptianscontrolledmostgovernmentalandculturalinstitutions,inparticipationwithwestern
(mainlyFrench)experts.TanzimDepartmentin1889,forexample,employed4Egyptiansand6
FrenchengineersandallformalcorrespondenceandcommunicationswerewritteninFrench42.
Underthisorganization,thetraditionalmasterbuilder’srolewassubdividedamongseveral
institutions:thearchitect,fordesignandproductionofacceptedscaleddrawings;theMinistry
ofPublicWorks,fordesignreviews,permissionsandinspection;andfinally,thenewbuilder
whohadtoconstructthebuildingexactlyasperthedrawingsandspecifications43.
From1883onwards,newbuildingactivitiesandrestorationswerenotallowedwithoutprior
permissionfromtheTanzimdepartment,basedonapproveddrawingsmadeby‘architect/
engineer’.Adecreeissuedon8thSeptember1883fromtheMinistryofPublicWorks44(Fig.7)
said:“Clause1:Anybuildingactivitieswithincitiesshouldobtainaformalpermissionbeforethe
workcommences”.Clause2ofthesamedecreeinsistedthattheapplicationforbuilding
permissionshouldbeaccompaniedby“drawingsoftheplot,roadsandneighboursdrawnona
scale1:200”.Thenewlegislationrequiredeverynewbuildingtofollowthedefinedroad
alignmentmaps(KhututTanzim)45.Thesamedecreesettheminimumdimensionsofaroomto
be4(L)x3(W)x3(h)meters.Anynon-approvedactivitieswereconsideredillegalandweresubject
toapenaltyordemolition46.TheextentoftheserestrictionswasdescribedbyMahboubduring
the1930s:‘They[powerofrules]arewidetotheextentthatbytheapplicationofTanzim
14
Alignmentlawsof1881,1887and1889,buildinglinescanbedecreedforthewideningor
modifyingofanypublicstreetorroad.Nonewconstructionscanencroachontheselines,and,
moreover,heighteningoranyformsofmaintenance,includingevenplasteringofsuchportions
ofexistingbuildingsasarecutbytheselines,areforbidden.’47
Themasterbuilder,thecentralcharacterinbuildingactivitiesintheCairoof1800,wasthe
mainvictimofthenewbuildingregulationsanddecrees,andwasreplacedbyacomplex
technicalprocessofplanning,drawings,applicationandconstructionbytheendofthecentury.
Thenewsystemrequiredqualifiedprofessionalstoimplementthestate’svision,andonly
architectswithexperienceinproducingscaleddrawingsforformalreviewandpermission
purposes.Furthermore,theconstructionworkhadtobesupervisedbythearchitect/engineer
andTanzimofficersasperalegislativedecreeissuedon8thSeptember188348.Thedecree
definedseveralconditionsandrecommendedcertainformsandspatialordersandsetseveral
hygienicregimesandspatialrequirementssuchasminimuminternalroomconfiguration,
naturalventilationforallrooms,andorientingopeningstothenorth,withprovisionforafewto
thesouth(forcrossventilation)(Fig.8).Moreover,itrequiredatoiletforeveryclosed
apartmentandrecommendedconstructionmaterialsandfinishes,externalandinternalaswell
asinspectionprocedures:wallsshouldbemadeof‘limestoneorbrickswithlimemortar’49.
‘Internalwallsshouldbeplasteredandreceiveonecoatofoilpaint’.Allworkshouldbe
inspectedfrequentlybytheMinistryofPublicWorks’engineers50.
SOCIALECONOMYandTHEUNAFFORDABLETRADITION
HomesofOldCairohadnooptionbuttoreplacetheintroverted,largeplotsizehouseswith
extrovertedhighrise(3-4storeys)compacthouses,inwhichthehorizontally-stretchedHarem
turnedintoverticallyorganizedwings.Transformationofsocio-culturalandeconomicconditions
definitelytookitstollonthebuiltfabricineveryaspect.Withthedepartureofrichmerchants,
mostofbuildingtradewasonsmallplotsandpart-sharesduetoinheritance;someshareshad
beensoldseparatelyorswappedwithothers.Thevastmajorityofsellingrecordsinal-Babal-
Ali’scourtaroundtheturnofthecenturyfollowedthesameconvention51.Theresultwassmall
plotsforreduced,compact,vertically-extendedhousesthatsoondevelopedintojoint-
householdunits,inwhichfamilyrelativesusedtooccupyseparateapartmentswithinthesame
15
building.KennethCunoreportedthatthejoint-householdsystempredominatedurbanhousing
inEgyptattheturnofthe20thcentury52.Inhisstudy,Cunofoundthatthemajorityofhousesin
Cairoconsistedofjoint-householdunitsof7members(58%)ratherthanthesinglehousesof
thesecondhalfofthenineteenthcentury53.Attheturnofthetwentiethcentury,onlyafew
housesofcourtyardintrovertedorganizationwerestillinactualuse.
Emergingdomestictypologyhadtoaccommodatefamilieswithinpartsofprevioushouses,
withnewsocio-spatiallogicthatwasorganizedvertically.Thebasicunitofthefamily,the
masterofthefamily,wouldoccupythefirsttwolevels:thegroundlevelhadanentrance,main
hawsh,forstableandfoodstorage,aMajlismaleandfamilyreceptionspace,akitchenwith
ovenandafewservices[R3.1.07]54.Ifmorespacewereavailable,theharemwingcouldbepart
ofthislevel.Upperlevelswerearrangedtoincludeavarietyofsleeping(harem)wingswith
smallserviceareas,eachofwhichhousedasub-familybranch,mainlyeldersonsandtheir
families(Fig.9).Asecondstageofthisdevelopmentcamewheneachfamilyresidencewas
dividedintoseparateapartmentswhoseoccupantswerenotrelatedtoeachother.Thiswas
takingplace,chieflyduringthe1940s-1960s,paralleltothemodernmovementinEuropeand
theriseofapartmentbuildingsincosmopolitanCairoandpromotedbythestate55.Thevacant
multi-storyhouseswerethenfilledwithimmediateoccupantsfromdifferentbackgrounds.For
thefirsttime,everyunitofthebuildinghadtoworkindependentlyandincludeallservices.The
sharedkitchenonthegroundfloorstartedtodisappearandsmallkitchenunitswereimplanted
ateverylevel.WhilesurveyingsomeofthesehousesinalGammaliyyah,tightkitchensand
bathroomswerefoundtobecommonfeatures.
Thistransformationhadprofoundimplicationsforthesocialcohesionandphysical
infrastructureofthesebuildings.Verticalextensionsmeantreducingareasofdirect
communicationbetweenhousesfromonesideandthepublicspherefromtheother,both
visuallyandvocally,inabreakfromthelocaltraditionthatreliedonthecontinuousflowof
activitiesbetweenprivateandpublicspheresandwherezonesoftransitionoccupiedand
transcendedtheboundariesbetweenindoorandoutdoorspaces.Undertheneworder,there
wasaneedforalternativemeansofcommunicationbetweenhighlevelsandthealleyspace.
Operablewindows,basedonthemodernRumistyle56,andterracesemergedtodominate
facades,beingspeciallyrecommendedbynewbuildingregulations.Balconiesbecamethe
transitionalspacesprovidingoutwardoverlappingspaceswiththealleyforthoselivinginhigh
16
levelapartmentstostayincontactwitheventstakingplaceontheground.Similarly,pushing
apartmentstowardshigherlevelsfacilitatedtheincreaseinthenumberofretailshopsand
workshopsintrudingintogroundfloorareasopeningtotheharahspace.
CONCLUSIONS:PARTINGHISTORYORINTRODUCINGMODERNITY??
InthispaperIexaminedthecurrentsofmodernitythroughoutthelastquarterofNineteenth
CenturyandEarlyTwentiethCenturythroughmulti-layeredanalysis.Iarguedthatcurrentsof
reformsthatinvolvethegenderquestion,Issuesofidentity,socialeconomyandspatial
transformationwereinpresenceineverydaylifeoftheCairenesintheHawarioftheOldCityas
theywereactiveintheModernQuartersinIsmailiCairo.Whiletheinternalmigrationtowards
thenewEuropean-stylequarterswasanexplicitactofchangeinlifestyleandengagementwith
modernlifeatthetime,theanalysisofthearchitectureofhomeintheOldCityandthenewly
introducedlegislationsshowedprofoundtransformationinthebuildingsandthefabricofthe
oldcitywhichareanotherpathofmodernitythatisgenuineandauthenticinresponsetolocal
livingconditionsandsocialneed.Itisfoundstrikingthatthedeclineoffortunesandservicesin
theoldhawari,didnotresultinbreakdowninitsoperation.Rather,thecenturies-old
communitiesprovedresilientandflexibletoabsorbtheprofoundchangeandreconfigureits
spatialstructuretomanagenewconditionsofmodernlife,withindustrialeconomyatitscentre.
Furthermore,thedepartureoftherichmerchantsandelitefromoldCairo,while
contributingtothephysicalandfinancialdeterioration,didnotresultinasimilardeclineof
sharedsocialactivities.Coffeehousesduringthe1920s,accordingtoNaguibMahfouz57,were
thesitesformeetings,fundingandarrangingrevoltsandattacksagainsttheBritishsoldiers.
Theywerealsolocalpublicvenuesfullofpeopleandentertainerseverynightuntilthemorning.
InPalaceWalk58,Mahfouzdescribedsuchacontinuouslyactiveenvironment:‘Therewasno
cluebywhichtojudgethetime.Thestreetnoiseoutsideherroomwouldcontinueuntildawn.
She[awifeawaitingherhusband’sreturn]couldhearthebabbleofvoicesfromthecoffee
housesandbars,whetheritwasearlyevening,midnight,orjustbeforedaybreak.’59Suchalively
picturewasaffirmedbybothStanleyLane-PooleattheturnofthecenturyandbyAhmed
Mahfouz60in‘MysteryofCairo’,ararebookaboutCairenelifeattheturnofthecentury.
Theturnofthetwentiethcenturywasfoundtobethemostchallengingperiodforthe
survivalofthehawariofCairo,withlackofsupport,intensivemigrationsanddestructiontoits
17
infrastructureandphsyicalsystems.OldCairowasabattlegroundfortheemergingintellectual
reformmovementanditspositiononwomen’sparticipationinsocietyandthepublicsphere,
andwhereradicalculturewasdeeplyrootedandmostpowerful.However,changeinthe
popularmoodtowardswomenwasfacilitatedandencouragedbytheemergenceofthemodern
quartersofEuropeanCairo,rulers’pressuretodrivethewealthymerchantstoresideinnewly
developedzones,whileformalinstitutionstookforcefulactiontoreformthebuiltenvironment.
Medievalhousesandharawiwerethefirsttobeaffectedbythisprocessofchange,
fundamentallyandstructurally.Courtyard-centredhousesbecameanunnecessaryluxuryfor
theemerginglowclasscommunity.Thisformoforganizationwasreplacedbythemore
affordable,compactandextrovertedmulti-storyfamilyhousesonsmallerplotsofland.
Largehousesweredividedintosmallerplotsduetoinheritancesandexchangelaws,and
latereveryportionwasdevelopedasanindependentunit/building.Thenotionofhavinga
housetoexclusivelyaccommodateoneextendedfamilywasindeclineandgivingwaytomore
dividedandindependentapartments.Inthemeantime,thestate’sformalinstitutionsexercised
powerfulcontroloveractivitiesinthepublicsphere,manifestedintheopeningofthewestern
deadendtothroughtraffic,declaringtwohousesashistoricalsitesandrequestingformal
permitspriortoanypublicfestivitiesandcelebrationsinpublicspaces.Thesovereigntyofthe
localsocialgroupwas,hence,compromisedandtheircontroloverthepublicspherewas
challengedbyemerginginstitutions.
WhileEuropeaninfluenceonthearchitectureofhomeinCairowaslargelyperceivedinits
directformsofapartmentbuildingsinthenewIsmailiquartersofLate19thCenturyCairo,its
deepeffectthatlaterchangedtheurbanstructure,cultureandfabricofthemetropolis
remainedimplicitintheOldCity.Suchgapinresearch,inmyview,requiresfurthereffortsand
explorationonthewaycurrentsofmodernitymetandnegotiatedlongrootedtraditionsand
radicalthoughts.
18
FIGURES
Fig.1:ModelModernHousesofMuhammadAli’sera
Fig.2:EarlyclassicalPeriodApartmentBuilding
19
Fig.3:CherifPachaStreetinAlexandriaaBoulevardofearlytwentiethCentury(CourtesytoRBSCL-TheAmericanUniversityinCairo)
Fig.4:EarlyplansofmodernOfficeBuildinginCairobyHassanFathy(CourtesytoRBSCL-TheAmericanUniversityinCairo)
20
Fig.5WissaWasifDiplomaProjectinCairo:Earlydesignsofopencourtyardhouses(1930s)(CourtesytoRBSCL-TheAmericanUniversityinCairo)
Fig.6StoneSeatsinthealleywaysoftheoldCity(Lane-Poole,theStoryofCairo,1902)
21
Fig.7Originaldecreeforfirstbuildingregulationin1880s
Fig.8:MoreorderedinternalFaçadesof1880shousesintheOldcity:BaytAlKharazi(1881)
22
Fig.9:CommonTypologyofhousebuildingsforsmallerfamilyunitsinearlyTwentiethCentury:
ZuqaqAl-DarbAl-Asfar.
NOTESANDREFERENCES1SophiaLane-PooledescribinghercriticismofMuhammadAli’spoliciesandplanstomodernizeEgyptandabandontheoldcityduringherstayinCairo.See:S.Lane-Poole,TheEnglishwomaninEgypt:LettersfromCairo.2volumes.(London:WilliamClowes&Sons.,1845)2S.Lane-Pool,TheStoryofCairo.(London:J.M.Dent&Co.1902).p13MuhammadAliwastherulerofEgyptfrom1805-1847,andisconsideredthefounderofmodernEgypt,wherehebuiltamodernarmyandnavy.HedreamedofEgyptasapowerfulandadvancedstateandestablishedthefirstindustrialeconomyinEgypt.4Lane-Poole,TheEnglishWomaninEgypt.p49.InherletterofJuly1843,shestated,‘aproclamationhasbeenissuedbythePashaforextensivealterationandrepairsthroughoutthecity.Thehousesaretobe
23
whitewashedwithinandwithout;thosewhoinhabitruinedhousesaretorepairorsellthem;anduninhabiteddwellingsaretobepulleddownforthepurposeofformingsquaresandgardens;mashrabiyyatareforbidden,andmastabahsaretoberemoved.’Thiswasquoted,aswell,in:J.Abu-Loghud,Cairo:1001yearsofcityvictorious.(Princeton:PrincetonUniversityPress,1971)p93-945B.Kenzari,&Y.ElSheshtawy,TheAmbiguousVeil:OnTransparency,theMashrabiy'ya,andArchitecture.JournalofArchitecturalEducation.Vol56,no4,Pp.17-25.(2003)p226AbuLoghud,Cairo.7Theforcewasapparentinseveraldecreesissuedduringthe1880stoapplyconstraintsonnewbuildingsintheformofspecificstandardssuchasroomsizes,materialsandexternalandinteriorfinishes.TheseallweredrivenfromAliMubarak’svision(asquotedatthebeginningofthechapter).Seeforexample,decreeissuedon1stSeptember1882,imposingthefirstbuildingregulations(showninpage178)8Beinin,J.&Zachary,L.WorkersontheNile:nationalism,communism,Islam,andtheEgyptianworkingclass,1882-1954.(Cairo:TheAmericanUniversityinCairoPress,1998).p24;J.Beinin,FormationofTheEgyptianWorkingClass.MERIPReports,no.94:OriginsoftheWorkingClass,ClassintheMiddleEast.Washington:MiddleEastResearchandInformationCentre,Pp14-23,(1981)p159Jean-LucArnaudarguedthatmovingthosemerchantstonewquarterswasaprincipalplanofthegovernment.Merchantslivingattheedgeoftheoldcity,inparticular,weregivenlargeplotsinnewquarterstobuildnewhomes,while‘keepingtheirbusinesses(shops,stores)intheoldcity,whichshouldremainthecentralsitefortradeinCairointhelongterm’.ThiswasplannedtofeedthenewIsmailiaquarterwithactivemovementandlivelyenvironment.SeeJean-LucArnaudLeCaire:MiseenPlaced’unevillemodern1867-1097,Desintérêtsduprinceauxsociétésprivées.ArabictranslationbyHalimTouson&FuadEl-Dahan(2002)Cairo:HigherCommissionforCultureinassociationwithFrenchCentreforCultureandCooperationinCairo.(1998)p15310Ishshash(pl.,single:ishshah)andmeansatemporarystructure,mainlyoftimber.11Ahwash(pl.,singlehawsh)meansgatedopenlandfilledwithtents.However,thisphenomenonwasnotpresentatallhawari.Someofthemdidnotexperiencesuchmigrantwaves(atleastnotextensively)asAl-Darbal-Ahmar.12SuchasMinistryofEducation,MinistryofPublicWorkandothers.13ThosenameswerelistedbyAlbertHourani,inhisseminalwork,ArabthoughtsintheliberalageasleadingreformersinEgypt,duringtheperiod1850-1940.SeeA.A.HouraniArabicthoughtintheliberalage,1798-1939.(London:OxfordUniversityPress,1962)14H.Shaarawi,Haremyears:TheMemoirsofanEgyptianfeminist.TranslatedandIntroducedbyMargotBadran.(NewYork:FeministPressattheCityUniversityofNewYork,1986).p1115Hourani,ArabThoughtintheLiberalAge,ibid.16RefertoQassimAmin’sLiberationofwomen;AhmedLutfiAl-SayyidArticlesinAL-Jarida.17Hourani,ibid.10318ThiswasidenticaltotheviewofGamalEl-DinEl-Afghani’sarticlesinAl-lata’ifmagazineduring1880s.19Amin,Tahriral-Mar’aa(Theliberalizationofwomen),ArabicTitle.InEmara,M.(2008)QasimAmin:Completeworks.Cairo:Daral-Shorouq.Pp319-417.p32220MuhammadEmarajustifiedhisargument,thatAminhadlittleknowledgeaboutstrongreligiousreferencesusedinhisbook.HereferredtoseveralstatementsbytheircontemporariesthatAbdusupportedthebookandwasassumedtohavewrittenlargepartsofitwhilehewastheMufti,thehighestscholarlypostinEgypt.SeeEmara,QasimAmin.p117-12721B.D.CannonNineteenth-CenturyArabicWritingsonWomenandSociety:TheInterimRoleoftheMasonicPressinCairo-(al-Lataif,1885-1895).InternationalJournalofMiddleEastStudies.Vol.17,No.4.(Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress,1985).pp463-484,p469-470;Womenwerealreadyadmittedto
24
certainfieldsofeducation.Forexample,In28thSeptember1886,13femalestudentsgraduatedwithdiplomasfromtheSchoolofBirthaswasannouncedintheformalnewspaperofthetime:al-Waqa’Ial-MasriyyahIssue28thSeptember1886.p92422Shaarawi,Ibid.p723Amin,Al-Mar’aal-jadida,1900.SeeMohammadImara,QasimAmin:CompleteWorks.24H.ElSadda,Gender,NationandtheArabicNovel:Egypt1892-2008.(Edinburgh:EdinburghUniversityPress.2012)25 H. El Sadda Imaging the "New Man": Gender and Nation in Arab Literary Narratives in the EarlyTwentiethCentury,JournalofMiddleEastWomen’sStudies,Vol.3,No.2,pp31-55,(2007)p32.26E.Blackmar,Manhattanforrent1785-1850.(Ithaca:CornellUniversityPress,1989)27 B. M. Lane, (ed.) Housing and Dwelling: Perspectives on Modern domestic architecture. (London:Routledge,2007)28E.C.Cromley,Alonetogether:AhistoryofNewYork’searlyapartments. (NewYork:CornellUniversityPress,1990)29Cromley,ibid.,asquotedinLane,B.M.(ed.),2007,‘HousingandDwelling’,p106.30Ibid.,p107.31Blackmar,‘Thesocialmeaningsofhousing’,p108.Blackmar,E.(1989)“Thesocialmeaningsofhousing,1800-1840”,inB.M.Lane,(ed.),2007,‘HousingandDwelling’,p10832L.Pollard,TheFamilyPoliticsofColonizingandLiberatingEgypt,1882-1919,SocialPolitics,7(1),(2007)pp.47-7933Ibid.34Ibid,p5835Amin,TheLiberationofWoman.TranslationismadebytheAuthor.36Ibid.37AliMubarak(1823-18953)wasthefirstministerofPublicWorksinEgypt,andwasoneofthemostinfluentialEgyptianreformersinthesecondhalfofthe19thcentury.HewaseducatedinFrance(1844-850)andledtheEgyptianRuler,KhediveIsmail’sprojecttobuildEuropeanCairo.Thisstatementwaswritteninhisbook,al-Khitatal-Tawfiqiyyah.ThetranslationistakenfromKhaledAsfour,IdentityintheArabRegion:ArchitectsandProjectsfromEgypt,Iraq,SaudiArabia,KuwaitandQatar.p15138ADecreeissuedbytheCabinetconcerningtheconditionsandthestructureoftheTanzimDepartmentand its responsibilities, 22nd February 1882. Ministry of Public Works. Archival Document, file number6/2/APublicWorks(ArchivalCode:0075-035967.)Cairo:TheNationalCentreforArchivalDocuments.39Ibid.40 As described by elderly members (R1 & R4), during the 1930s and 1940s, people were arrangingfestivities and parties in the public spaces freely and without intervention of the authorities. The briefrecordsofStanleyLane-Pooleaboutthe life in thehawariofoldcityconfirmthispropositionthatsocialactivities likeweddings, festivitiesandfuneralswereactivelytakingplaceonadailybasis.Mybelieve isthatsuchlegislationwasstrictlyappliedonmainroadsandthoroughfaresandnotonthehawari,whichwererarelyvisitedbytheofficials.41SeeseveraldecreesfornewalignmentsofCairenehawariissuedduring1889-1910,inwhichsomeplotswereeitheraddedorexcludedfromthepublicroadnetwork.Forexample:Decreesdated28thNovember1910(File6/3/D,PublicWorks,Code:0075-036184);9thNovember1908(File6/3/D,PublicWorks,Code:0075-036183).Cairo:TheNationalCentreforArchivalDocuments.42TheCabinethadrequestedtranslationofthosecorrespondencestodiscussthem.SomelettersonthisrequestwerefoundamongthearchivalrecordsoftheMinistryofPublicWorksduringthe1880s.
25
43InthedailyrecordsoftheMinistryofPublicWorks,severalprojectswereannouncedforbiddingonconstructionworks.Forsuchbidding,detailedspecificationsanddrawingswerespecifiedbytheownerortheinstitutionwhichownedthebuilding.Seeforexample:record5/2/1M(Architecturalissueddocuments),no.355-Buildings,fortheyear1877.44FormalDecreefortheconditionofbuildinghouseswithinbigcities,8thSeptember1883.MinistryofPublicWorks.ArchivalDocument,filenumber6/2/APublicWorks(ArchivalCode:0075-035972.)Cairo:TheNationalCentreforArchivalDocuments.45Duetothelackofprofessionalsatthisperiodandtheirhighcost,Iexpectthatmanybuildingownerslefttheirbuildingsun-restoredandlimitedtheopportunitiesforlowclasspeopletobuildnewhouses.Ruinedbuildingswerecontinuouslyoccupiedwithoutmaintenance.Inthepopularal-Moqattamnewspaper,aFrenchArchitectcalledKorsicouspublisheddailyadvertisementsforbuildinghousesandreceivinghisfeesindelayedinstallments.SeeAl-MoqattamNewspaper,issues3279,80,81dated8th,11th,15thJanuary1900.Cairo:Sarroufandco.46AllthesedecisionsweretakenbytheTanzimdepartmentandMinistryofPublicWorksundertheAlignmentActof1881,andtheLawofExpropriationof1906Mahboub,ibid.p28947Mahboubibid.p29248FormalDecreefortheconditionsonbuildinghouseswithinbigcities,8thSeptember1883,MinistryofPublicWorks.ArchivalDocument,filenumber6/2/APublicWorks(ArchivalCode:0075-035972.)Cairo:TheNationalCentreforArchivalDocuments.49Ibid.50Ibid51Theyweresimilarevenintermsofgenderoflandlords/owners:whoweremainlyfemales(widows,orfreedslaves)52K.Cuno,Jointfamilyhouseholdsandruralnotablesin19th-centuryEgypt.InternationalJournalofMiddleEastStudies.Vol.27,n4.(1995)Pp.485-502.p48653Cuno,ibid.54archivalrecords55NaguibMahfouz,describedhisfamily’smovefromal-Gammaliyyahtoal-Abbasiyyah,thenewdistrictofthecity,asearlyasthe1930s.56Rumi-stylewindowsaretimberwindowsdevelopedduringMuhammadAli’seratosimulateEuropeanwindowsthatarerelativelytallanddividedintothreeverticalparts.57NaguibMahfouzisaNobelPrizeWinnerinLiterature.InhisTrilogyNovels,whichweresetinnearbyal-Darbal-Asfar,‘heusedthestreetsandalleysofhistoricCairoattheturnofthecenturyasthebackdropofhissocialist-realistnovels’,thatappearedasdocumentationofthesocialhistoryofoldCairoatthattime.SeeWilliams,ReconstructingIslamicCairo.p27458Thisnovel,wasfirstpublishedin1956,anddescribeslifeinthecontextofal-Darbal-Asfarfrom1910-1920, where Mahfouz lived out his childhood. Therefore his novels about old Cairo are considered asdocumentationofreallifeofthetime,especiallyinGammaliyyahwhereal-Darbal-Asfarlies.59Mahfouz,PalaceWalk.p160Mahfouz,Khabayaal-Qahira(MysteriesofCairo).
Top Related